Posterior kV-CBCT scanning of the head and neck region minimizes doses to critical organs with sustained image quality

We evaluated the absorbed dose to critical organs, as well as the image quality, at different partial angles in kV-CBCT (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) scanning of the head and neck region. CBCT images of phantom from a 200° rotation were performed by using three different scanning paths, anterior, posterior, and right lateral with Catphan504 and RANDO phantoms. Critical organ dose was measured using TLD 100H in the RANDO phantom. The image quality of those phantoms was evaluated, using HU uniformity, HU linearity, contrast-to-noise ratio, low contrast visibility and spatial resolution with the Catphan504 dataset; and 5-point grading scales for the RANDO phantom dataset by five radiation oncologists. The image qualities from Catphan504 and RANDO phantom of every scanning path were comparable, with no statistically significant difference (p ≥ 0.05). However, there was a significant difference in the critical organ dose in all paths (p < 0.05), depending on the critical organ location and the scanning direction. Scanning directions show no effects on the image quality. Differences in absorbed dose to critical organs should were evaluated. The posterior scanning path for the CBCT was deemed preferable due because of considerably lower doses to several critical organs of the head and neck region.     

Dose calculation accuracy of different image value to density tables for cone-beam CT planning in head & neck and pelvic localizations

PurposeWe aimed to identify the most accurate combination of phantom and protocol for image value to density table (IVDT) on volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) dose calculation based on kV-Cone-beam CT imaging, for head and neck (H&N) and pelvic localizations.MethodsThree phantoms (Catphan^®600, CIRS^®062M (inner phantom for head and outer phantom for body), and TomoTherapy^® “Cheese” phantom) were used to create IVDT curves of CBCT systems with two different CBCT protocols (Standard-dose Head and Standard Pelvis). Hounsfield Unit (HU) time stability and repeatability for a single On-Board-Imager (OBI) and compatibility of two distinct devices were assessed with Catphan^®600. Images from the anthropomorphic phantom CIRS ATOM^® for both CT and CBCT modalities were used for VMAT dose calculation from different IVDT curves. Dosimetric indices from CT and CBCT imaging were compared.ResultsIVDT curves from CBCT images were highly different depending on phantom used (up to 1000 HU for high densities) and protocol applied (up to 200 HU for high densities). HU time stability was verified over seven weeks. A maximum difference of 3% on the dose calculation indices studied was found between CT and CBCT VMAT dose calculation across the two localizations using appropriate IVDT curves. One IVDT curve per localization can be established with a bi-monthly verification of IVDT-CBCT.ConclusionsThe IVDT-CBCT_CIRS-Head phantom with the Standard-dose Head protocol was the most accurate combination for dose calculation on H&N CBCT images. For pelvic localizations, the IVDT-CBCT_Cheese established with the Standard Pelvis protocol provided the best accuracy.     

Accuracy of dose calculation on iterative CBCT for head and neck radiotherapy

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility of the use of iterative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for dose calculation in the head and neck region.MethodsThis study includes phantom and clinical studies. All acquired CBCT images were reconstructed with Feldkamp–Davis–Kress algorithm-based CBCT (FDK-CBCT) and iterative CBCT (iCBCT) algorithm. The Hounsfield unit (HU) consistency between the head and body phantoms was determined in both reconstruction techniques. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated for 16 head and neck patients on a planning CT scan, and the doses were recalculated on FDK-CBCT and iCBCT with Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB (AXB). As a comparison of the accuracy of dose calculations, the absolute dosimetric difference and 1%/1 mm gamma passing rate analysis were analyzed.ResultsThe difference in the mean HU values between the head and body phantoms was larger for FDK-CBCT (max value: 449.1 HU) than iCBCT (260.0 HU). The median dosimetric difference from the planning CT were <1.0% for both FDK-CBCT and iCBCT but smaller differences were found with iCBCT (planning target volume D_50%: 0.38% (0.15–0.59%) for FDK-CBCT, 0.28% (0.13–0.49%) for iCBCT, AAA; 0.14% (0.04–0.19%) for FDK-CBCT, 0.07% (0.02–0.20%) for iCBCT). The mean gamma passing rate was significantly better in iCBCT than FDK-CBCT (AAA: 98.7% for FDK-CBCT, 99.4% for iCBCT; AXB: 96.8% for FDK_CBCT, 97.5% for iCBCT).ConclusionThe iCBCT-based dose calculation in VMAT for head and neck cancer was accurate compared to FDK-CBCT.     

Quality control in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) EFOMP-ESTRO-IAEA protocol (summary report)

The aim of the guideline presented in this article is to unify the test parameters for image quality evaluation and radiation output in all types of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems. The applications of CBCT spread over dental and interventional radiology, guided surgery and radiotherapy. The chosen tests provide the means to objectively evaluate the performance and monitor the constancy of the imaging chain. Experience from all involved associations has been collected to achieve a consensus that is rigorous and helpful for the practice.The guideline recommends to assess image quality in terms of uniformity, geometrical precision, voxel density values (or Hounsfield units where available), noise, low contrast resolution and spatial resolution measurements. These tests usually require the use of a phantom and evaluation software. Radiation output can be determined with a kerma-area product meter attached to the tube case. Alternatively, a solid state dosimeter attached to the flat panel and a simple geometric relationship can be used to calculate the dose to the isocentre. Summary tables including action levels and recommended frequencies for each test, as well as relevant references, are provided.If the radiation output or image quality deviates from expected values, or exceeds documented action levels for a given system, a more in depth system analysis (using conventional tests) and corrective maintenance work may be required.     

Machine log file-based dose verification using novel iterative CBCT reconstruction algorithm in commercial software during volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer patients

PurposeTo evaluate the utility of the use of iterative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for machine log file-based dose verification during volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer patients.MethodsAll CBCT acquisition data were used to reconstruct images with the Feldkamp-Davis-Kress algorithm (FDK-CBCT) and the novel iterative algorithm (iCBCT). The Hounsfield unit (HU)-electron density curves for CBCT images were created using the Advanced Electron Density Phantom. The I’mRT and anthropomorphic phantoms were irradiated with VMAT after CBCT registration. Subsequently, fourteen prostate cancer patients received VMAT after CBCT registration. Machine log files and both CBCT images were exported to the PerFRACTION software, and a 3D patient dose was reconstructed. Mean dose for planning target volume (PTV), the bladder, and rectum and the 3D gamma analysis were evaluated.ResultsFor the phantom studies, the variation of HU values was observed at the central position surrounding the bones in FDK-CBCT. There were almost no changes in the difference of doses at the isocenter between measurement and reconstructed dose for planning CT (pCT), FDK-CBCT, and iCBCT. Mean dose differences of PTV, rectum, and bladder between iCBCT and pCT were approximately 2% lower than those between FDK-CBCT and pCT. For the clinical study, average gamma analysis for 2%/2 mm was 98.22% ± 1.07 and 98.81% ± 1.25% in FDK-CBCT and iCBCT, respectively.ConclusionsA similar machine log file-based dose verification accuracy is obtained for FDK-CBCT and iCBCT during VMAT for prostate cancer patients.     

Assessment of ionization chamber correction factors in photon beams using a time saving strategy with PENELOPE code

The purpose of this study was to investigate Monte Carlo-based perturbation and beam quality correction factors for ionization chambers in photon beams using a saving time strategy with PENELOPE code. Simulations for calculating absorbed doses to water using full spectra of photon beams impinging the whole water phantom and those using a phase-space file previously stored around the point of interest were performed and compared. The widely used NE2571 ionization chamber was modeled with PENELOPE using data from the literature in order to calculate absorbed doses to the air cavity of the chamber. Absorbed doses to water at reference depth were also calculated for providing the perturbation and beam quality correction factors for that chamber in high energy photon beams. Results obtained in this study show that simulations with phase-space files appropriately stored can be up to ten times shorter than using a full spectrum of photon beams in the input-file. Values of k_Q and its components for the NE2571 ionization chamber showed good agreement with published values in the literature and are provided with typical statistical uncertainties of 0.2%. Comparisons to k_Q values published in current dosimetry protocols such as the AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 showed maximum percentage differences of 0.1% and 0.6% respectively. The proposed strategy presented a significant efficiency gain and can be applied for a variety of ionization chambers and clinical photon beams.     

A multicenter dosimetry study to evaluate the imaging dose from Elekta XVI and Varian OBI kV-CBCT systems to cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs)

The increasing use of daily CBCT in radiotherapy has raised concerns about the additional dose delivered to the patient, and it can also become a concern issue for those patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) (Pacemaker [PM] and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator [ICD]). Although guidelines highly recommend that the cumulative dose received by CIEDs should be kept as low as possible, and a safe threshold based on patient risk classification needs to be respected, this additional imaging dose is not usually considered. Four centers with different dosimetry systems and different CBCT imaging protocols participated in this multicenter study to investigate the imaging dose to the CIEDs from Elekta XVI and Varian OBI kV-CBCT systems. It was found that although imaging doses received by CIEDs outside the CBCT field are negligible, special attention should be paid to this value when CIEDs are inside the field because the daily use of CBCT can sometimes contribute considerably to the total dose received by a CIED.     

A review of dose calculation approaches with cone beam CT in photon and proton therapy

Background and purposeThe use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for performing dose calculations in radiation therapy has been widely investigated as it could provide a quantitative analysis of the dosimetric impact of changes in patients during the treatment. The aim of this review was to classify different techniques adopted to perform CBCT dose calculation and to report their dosimetric accuracy with respect to the metrics used.Methods and materialsA literature search was carried out in PubMed and ScienceDirect databases, based upon the following keywords: “cone beam computed tomography”, “CBCT”, “cone beam CT”, “dose calculation”, “accuracy”. Sixty-nine peer-reviewed relevant articles were included in this review: thirty-one patient studies, fifteen phantom studies and twenty-three patient & phantom studies. Most studies were found to have focused on head and neck, lung and prostate cancers.ResultsThe techniques adopted to perform CBCT dose calculation have been grouped in six categories labelled as (1) pCT calibration, (2) CBCT calibration, (3) HU override, (4) Deformable image registration, (5) Dose deformation, and (6) Combined techniques. Differences between CBCT dose and reference dose were reported both for target volumes and OARs.ConclusionsA comparison among the available techniques for CBCT dose calculations is challenging as many variables are involved. Therefore, a set of reporting standards is recommended to enable meaningful comparisons among different studies. The accuracy of the results was strongly dependent on the image quality, regardless of the methods used, highlighting the need for dose validation and quality assurance standards.     

Dosimetric characterization of an 192Ir brachytherapy source with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE

Monte Carlo calculations are highly spread and settled practice to calculate brachytherapy sources dosimetric parameters. In this study, recommendations of the AAPM TG-43U1 report have been followed to characterize the Varisource VS2000 ¹⁹²Ir high dose rate source, provided by Varian Oncology Systems.In order to obtain dosimetric parameters for this source, Monte Carlo calculations with PENELOPE code have been carried out. TG-43 formalism parameters have been presented, i.e., air kerma strength, dose rate constant, radial dose function and anisotropy function. Besides, a 2D Cartesian coordinates dose rate in water table has been calculated. These quantities are compared to this source reference data, finding results in good agreement with them.The data in the present study complement published data in the next aspects: (i) TG-43U1 recommendations are followed regarding to phantom ambient conditions and to uncertainty analysis, including statistical (type A) and systematic (type B) contributions; (ii) PENELOPE code is benchmarked for this source; (iii) Monte Carlo calculation methodology differs from that usually published in the way to estimate absorbed dose, leaving out the track-length estimator; (iv) the results of the present work comply with the most recent AAPM and ESTRO physics committee recommendations about Monte Carlo techniques, in regards to dose rate uncertainty values and established differences between our results and reference data.The results stated in this paper provide a complete parameter collection, which can be used for dosimetric calculations as well as a means of comparison with other datasets from this source.     

Radioprotection of eye lens using protective material in neuro cone-beam computed tomography: Estimation of dose reduction rate and image quality

PurposeIn cerebral angiography, for diagnosis and interventional neuroradiology, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan is frequently performed for evaluating brain parenchyma, cerebral hemorrhage, and cerebral infarction. However, the patient’s eye lens is more frequently exposed to excessive doses in these scans than in the previous angiography and interventional neuroradiology (INR) procedures. Hence, radioprotection for the lenses is needed. This study selects the most suitable eye lens protection material for CBCT from among nine materials by evaluating the dose reduction rate and image quality.MethodsTo determine the dose reduction rate, the lens doses were measured using an anthropomorphic head phantom and a real-time dosimeter. For image quality assessment, the artifact index was calculated based on the pixel value and image noise within various regions of interest in a water phantom.ResultsThe protective materials exhibited dose reduction; however, streak artifacts were observed near the materials. The dose reduction rate and the degree of the artifact varied significantly depending on the protective material. The dose reduction rates were 14.6%, 14.2%, and 26.0% when bismuth shield: normal (bismuth shield in the shape of an eye mask), bismuth shield: separate (two separate bismuth shields), and lead goggles were used, respectively. The “separate” bismuth shield was found to be effective in dose reduction without lowering the image quality.ConclusionWe found that bismuth shields and lead goggles are suitable protective devices for the optimal reduction of lens doses.     

Feasibility of image quality improvement for high-speed CBCT imaging using deep convolutional neural network for image-guided radiotherapy in prostate cancer

PurposeHigh-speed cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) can reduce both the scan time and the exposure dose. However, it causes noise and artifacts in the reconstructed images due to the lower number of acquired projection data. The purpose of this study is to improve the image quality of high-speed CBCT using a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN).MethodsCBCT images of 36 prostate cancer patients were selected. The CBCT images acquired at normal scan speed were defined as CBCT_100%. Simulated high-speed CBCT images acquired at twofold and fourfold scan speed were created, which were defined as CBCT_50% and CBCT_25%, respectively. The image quality of the CBCT_50% was treated as the requirement for IGRT in this study because previous studies reported that its image is sufficient with respect to IGRT. The DCNN model was trained to learn direct mapping from CBCT_25% to the corresponding CBCT_100%. The performance of the DCNN model was evaluated using the sixfold cross-validation method. CBCT images generated by DCNN (CBCT_25%+DCNN) were evaluated for voxel value accuracy and image quality.ResultsThe DCNN model can process CBCT_25% of a new patient within 0.06 s/slice. The CBCT_25%+DCNN was comparable to the CBCT_50% in terms of both voxel value accuracy and image quality.ConclusionsWe developed a DCNN model to remove noise and artifacts from high-speed CBCT. We emphasize that it is possible to reduce exposure to one quarter and to increase the CBCT scan speed by a factor of four.     

Comprehensive quality assurance phantom for the small animal radiation research platform (SARRP)

PurposeTo develop and test the suitability and performance of a comprehensive quality assurance (QA) phantom for the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform (SARRP).Methods and materialsA QA phantom was developed for carrying out daily, monthly and annual QA tasks including: imaging, dosimetry and treatment planning system (TPS) performance evaluation of the SARRP. The QA phantom consists of 15 (60 × 60 × 5 mm³) kV-energy tissue equivalent solid water slabs. The phantom can incorporate optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLD), Mosfet or film. One slab, with inserts and another slab with hole patterns are particularly designed for image QA.ResultsOutput constancy measurement results showed daily variations within 3%. Using the Mosfet in phantom as target, results showed that the difference between TPS calculations and measurements was within 5%. Annual QA results for the Percentage depth dose (PDD) curves, lateral beam profiles, beam flatness and beam profile symmetry were found consistent with results obtained at commissioning. PDD curves obtained using film and OSLDs showed good agreement. Image QA was performed monthly, with image-quality parameters assessed in terms of CBCT image geometric accuracy, CT number accuracy, image spatial resolution, noise and image uniformity.ConclusionsThe results show that the developed QA phantom can be employed as a tool for comprehensive performance evaluation of the SARRP. The study provides a useful reference for development of a comprehensive quality assurance program for the SARRP and other similar small animal irradiators, with proposed tolerances and frequency of required tests.     

Two examples of indication specific radiation dose calculations in dental CBCT and Multidetector CT scanners

PurposeTo calculate organ doses and estimate the effective dose for justification purposes in patients undergoing orthognathic treatment planning purposes and temporal bone imaging in dental cone beam CT (CBCT) and Multidetector CT (MDCT) scanners.MethodsThe radiation dose to the ICRP reference male voxel phantom was calculated for dedicated orthognathic treatment planning acquisitions via Monte Carlo simulations in two dental CBCT scanners, Promax 3D Max (Planmeca, FI) and NewTom VGi evo (QR s.r.l, IT) and in Somatom Definition Flash (Siemens, DE) MDCT scanner. For temporal bone imaging, radiation doses were calculated via MC simulations for a CBCT protocol in NewTom 5G (QR s.r.l, IT) and with the use of a software tool (CT-expo) for Somatom Force (Siemens, DE). All procedures had been optimized at the acceptance tests of the devices.ResultsFor orthognathic protocols, dental CBCT scanners deliver lower doses compared to MDCT scanners. The estimated effective dose (ED) was 0.32 mSv for a normal resolution operation mode in Promax 3D Max, 0.27 mSv in VGi-evo and 1.18 mSv in the Somatom Definition Flash. For temporal bone protocols, the Somatom Force resulted in an estimated ED of 0.28 mSv while for NewTom 5G the ED was 0.31 and 0.22 mSv for monolateral and bilateral imaging respectively.ConclusionsTwo clinical exams which are carried out with both a CBCT or a MDCT scanner were compared in terms of radiation dose. Dental CBCT scanners deliver lower doses for orthognathic patients whereas for temporal bone procedures the doses were similar.     

Kilovoltage beam model for flat panel imaging system with bow-tie filter for scatter prediction and correction

PurposeKilovoltage flat-panel imaging systems are used for cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and digital Tomosynthesis (DTS). Hereby, the presence of scatter and relatively large dose from imaging are challenging factors. In this study a phenomenological beam model was developed to characterize imager response to imaging beams with a bow-tie filter (Varian OBI system).Materials and methodThe kilovoltage beam model was based on dose ratio formalism and thus was using standard concepts of megavoltage dose calculation such as scatter factors, tissue maximum ratio and off-axis ratio. Primary and scatter (head and phantom scatter) were modeled with three Gaussian kernels. Parameters were based on measured transmission images for slabs of solid water of different total thickness and various jaw settings.ResultsThe beam model was used to evaluate contributions from primary, secondary and tertiary contributions for different geometrical objects such as cylinders and step-like phantoms. Theoretical predictions of radiographs using the model for known objects are consistent with the measurements.ConclusionSecondary and tertiary contributions were interpreted as scatter and can be subtracted from CBCT projections based on the analytical model. Therefore our model can provide a basis for improvement of image quality (less artifacts due to scatter, better contrast and resolution) in CBCT reconstruction.     

Change in Image Quality According to the 3D Locations of a CBCT Phantom

A patient’s position changes in every CBCT scan despite patient alignment protocols. However, there have been studies to determine image quality differences when an object is located at the center of the field of view (FOV). To evaluate changes in the image quality of the CBCT scan according to different object positions, the image quality indexes of the Alphard 3030 (Alphard Roentgen Ind., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) and the Rayscan Symphony (RAY Ind., Ltd., Suwon, Korea) were measured using the Quart DVT_AP phantom at the center of the FOV and 6 peripheral positions under four types of exposure conditions. Anterior, posterior, right, left, upper, and lower positions 1 cm offset from the center of the FOV were used for the peripheral positions. We evaluated and compared the voxel size, homogeneity, contrast to noise ratio (CNR), and the 10% point of the modulation transfer function (MTF10%) of the center and periphery. Because the voxel size, which is determined by the Nyquist frequency, was within tolerance, other image quality indexes were not influenced by the voxel size. For the CNR, homogeneity, and MTF10%, there were peripheral positions which showed considerable differences with statistical significance. The average difference between the center and periphery was up to 31.27% (CNR), 70.49% (homogeneity), and 13.64% (MTF10%). Homogeneity was under tolerance at some of the peripheral locations. Because the CNR, homogeneity, and MTF10% were significantly affected by positional changes of the phantom, an object’s position can influence the interpretation of follow up CBCT images. Therefore, efforts to locate the object in the same position are important.     

Practical radiation dosimetry across a variety of CBCT devices in Radiology

Cone beam technology is becoming more prominent in Radiology. In our hospital we have an extremity CT, an O-arm and a number of C-arms offering 3D capabilities. Each of these modalities use cone beam CT (CBCT) technology to image the area of interest in one single rotation. Traditional CTDI metrics for radiation dosimetry in CT depend on narrow beam geometry. The relevance of the CTDI as a dose indicator for cone beam scanning is contentious due to underestimation of dose lying outside the standard 100 mm chamber length and CTDI phantoms being of insufficient length.In an attempt to better quantify dose from cone beam scanning, alternative methodologies have been developed which attempt to counter the limitations of CTDI methodologies. In this comparison study we utilised the CBCT methodologies outlined in (i) IAEA Report 5, (ii) EFOMP’s protocol on QC in CBCT and (iii) conventional CTDI measurement and tested them on various CBCT systems used in Radiology. These methods were chosen as they use equipment that is typically available to a diagnostic imaging physicist.We determine that the EFOMP protocol and the conventional CTDI method produce the best estimate of the radiation output for quality control purposes. Our conclusion is that the EFOMP protocol is the fastest and easiest method to measure a CBCT metric but it is not always accessible. For the systems in our hospital we will adopt the EFOMP protocol for open systems (C-arms) and perform CTDI_Vol measurements using conventional techniques on enclosed systems (O-arm and extremity CT).     

A new cone-beam computed tomography dosimetry method providing optimal measurement positions: A Monte Carlo study

PurposeThe conventional weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDI_w) may not be suitable for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) dosimetry because a cross-sectional dose distribution is angularly inhomogeneous owing to partial angle irradiations. This study was conducted to develop a new dose metric (f(0)^CB_w) for CBCT dosimetry to determine a more accurate average dose in the central cross-sectional plane of a cylindrical phantom using Monte Carlo simulations.MethodsFirst, cross-sectional dose distributions of cylindrical polymethyl methacrylate phantoms over a wide range of phantom diameters (8–40 cm) were calculated for various CBCT scan protocols. Then, by obtaining linear least-squares fits of the full datasets of the cross-sectional dose distributions, the optimal radial positions, which represented measurement positions for the average phantom dose, were determined. Finally, the f(0)^CB_w method was developed by averaging point doses at the optimal radial positions of the phantoms. To demonstrate its validity, the relative differences between the average doses and each dose index value were estimated for the devised f(0)^CB_w, conventional CTDI_w, and Haba’s CTDI_w methods, respectively.ResultsThe relative differences between the average doses and each dose index value were within 4.1%, 16.7%, and 11.9% for the devised, conventional CTDI_w, and Haba’s CTDI_w methods, respectively.ConclusionsThe devised f(0)^CB_w value was calculated by averaging four “point doses” at 90° intervals and the optimal radial positions of the cylindrical phantom. The devised method can estimate the average dose more accurately than the previously developed CTDI_w methods for CBCT dosimetry.     

Assessment of the variation in CT scanner performance (image quality and Hounsfield units) with scan parameters,for image optimisation in radiotherapy treatment planning

PurposeTo define a method and investigate how the adjustment of scan parameters affected the image quality and Hounsfield units (HUs) on a CT scanner used for radiotherapy treatment planning. A lack of similar investigations in the literature may be a contributing factor in the apparent reluctance to optimise radiotherapy CT protocols.MethodA Catphan phantom was used to assess how image quality on a Toshiba Aquilion LB scanner changed with scan parameters. Acquisition and reconstruction field-of-view (FOV), collimation, image slice thickness, effective mAs per rotation and reconstruction algorithm were varied. Changes were assessed for HUs of different materials, high contrast spatial resolution (HCSR), contrast-noise ratio (CNR), HU uniformity, scan direction low contrast and CT dose-index.ResultsCNR and HCSR varied most with reconstruction algorithm, reconstruction FOV and effective mAs. Collimation, but not image slice width, had a significant effect on CT dose-index with narrower collimation giving higher doses. Dose increased with effective mAs. Highest HU differences were seen when changing reconstruction algorithm: 56 HU for densities close to water and 117 HU for bone-like materials. Acquisition FOV affected the HUs but reconstruction FOV and effective mAs did not.ConclusionsAll the scan parameters investigated affected the image quality metrics. Reconstruction algorithm, reconstruction FOV, collimation and effective mAs were most important. Reconstruction algorithm and acquisition FOV had significant effect on HU. The methodology is applicable to radiotherapy CT scanners when investigating image quality optimisation, prior to assessing the impact of scan protocol changes on clinical CT images and treatment plans.     

Surgivisio® and O-arm®O2 cone beam CT mobile systems for guidance of lumbar spine surgery: Comparison of patient radiation dose

PurposeTo compare patient radiation doses in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of two mobile systems used for navigation-assisted mini-invasive orthopedic surgery: O-arm®O2 and Surgivisio®.MethodsThe study focused on imaging of the spine. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were used to measure organs and effective doses (ED) during CBCT. An ionization-chamber and a solid-state sensor were used to measure the incident air-kerma (K_i) at the center of the CBCT field-of-view and K_i during 2D-imaging, respectively. The PCXMC software was used to calculate patient ED in 2D and CBCT configurations. The image quality in CBCT was evaluated with the CATPHAN phantom.ResultsThe experimental ED estimate for the low-dose 3D-modes was 2.41 and 0.35 mSv with O-arm®O2 (Low Dose 3D-small-abdomen) and Surgivisio® (3DSU-91 images), respectively. PCXMC results were consistent: 1.54 and 0.30 mSv. Organ doses were 5 to 12 times lower with Surgivisio®. K_i at patient skin were comparable on lateral 2D-imaging (0.5 mGy), but lower with O-arm®O2 on anteroposterior (0.3 versus 0.9 mGy). Both systems show poor low contrast resolution and similar high contrast spatial resolution (7 line-pairs/cm).ConclusionsThis study is the first to evaluate patient ED and organ doses with Surgivisio®. A significant difference in organs doses was observed between the CBCT systems. The study demonstrates that Surgivisio® used on spine delivers approximately five to six times less patient ED, compared to O-arm®O2, in low dose 3D-modes. Doses in 2D-mode preceding CBCT were higher with Surgivisio®, but negligible compared to CBCT doses under the experimental conditions tested.     

Three-dimensional printer-generated patient-specific phantom for artificial in vivo dosimetry in radiotherapy quality assurance

Pretreatment intensity-modulated radiotherapy quality assurance is performed using simple rectangular or cylindrical phantoms; thus, the dosimetric errors caused by complex patient-specific anatomy are absent in the evaluation objects. In this study, we construct a system for generating patient-specific three-dimensional (3D)-printed phantoms for radiotherapy dosimetry. An anthropomorphic head phantom containing the bone and hollow of the paranasal sinus is scanned by computed tomography (CT). Based on surface rendering data, a patient-specific phantom is formed using a fused-deposition-modeling-based 3D printer, with a polylactic acid filament as the printing material. Radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeters can be inserted in the 3D-printed phantom. The phantom shape, CT value, and absorbed doses are compared between the actual and 3D-printed phantoms. The shape difference between the actual and printed phantoms is less than 1 mm except in the bottom surface region. The average CT value of the infill region in the 3D-printed phantom is −6 ± 18 Hounsfield units (HU) and that of the vertical shell region is 126 ± 18 HU. When the same plans were irradiated, the dose differences were generally less than 2%. These results demonstrate the feasibility of the 3D-printed phantom for artificial in vivo dosimetry in radiotherapy quality assurance.