Red light, Phot1 and JAC1 modulate Phot2-dependent reorganization of chloroplast actin filaments and chloroplast avoidance movement

The phototropin (phot)-dependent intracellular relocation of chloroplasts is a ubiquitous phenomenon in plants. We have previously revealed the involvement of a short cp-actin (chloroplast actin) filament-based mechanism in this movement. Here, the reorganization of cp-actin filaments during the avoidance movement of chloroplasts was analyzed in higher time resolution under blue GFP (green fluorescent protein) excitation light in an actin filament-visualized line of Arabidopsis thaliana. Under standard background red light of 89 μmol m(-2) s(-1), cp-actin filaments transiently disappeared at approximately 30 s and reappeared in a biased configuration on chloroplasts approximately 70 s after blue excitation light irradiation. The timing of biased cp-actin reappearance was delayed under the background of strong red light or in the absence of red light. Consistently, chloroplast movement was delayed under these conditions. In phot1 mutants, acceleration of both the disappearance and reappearance of cp-actin filaments occurred, indicating an inhibitory action of phot1 on reorganization of cp-actin filaments. Avoidance movements began sooner in phot1 than in wild-type plants. No reorganization of cp-actin filaments was seen in phot2 or phot1phot2 mutants lacking phot2, which is responsible for avoidance movements. Surprisingly, jac1 (j-domain protein required for chloroplast accumulation response 1) mutants, lacking the accumulation response, showed no avoidance movements under the whole-cell irradiation condition for GFP observation. Cp-actin filaments in jac1 did not show a biased distribution, with a small or almost no transient decrease in the number. These results indicate a close association between the biased distribution of cp-actin filaments and chloroplast movement. Further, JAC1 is suggested to function in the biased cp-actin filament distribution by regulating their appearance and disappearance.     

Chloroplast actin filaments organize meshwork on the photorelocated chloroplasts in the moss <Emphasis Type="Italic">Physcomitrella patens</Emphasis>

Cytoskeleton dynamics during phototropin-dependent chloroplast photorelocation movement was analyzed in protonemal cells of actin- and microtubule-visualized lines of Physcomitrella patens expressing GFP- or tdTomato-talin and GFP-tubulin. Using newly developed epi- and trans-microbeam irradiation systems that permit fluorescence observation of the cell under blue microbeam irradiation inducing chloroplast relocation, it was revealed that meshwork of actin filaments formed at the chloroplast-accumulating area both in the avoidance and accumulation movements. The structure disappeared soon when blue microbeam was turned off, and it was not induced under red microbeam irradiation that did not evoke chloroplast relocation movement. In contrast, no apparent change in microtubule organization was detected during the movements. The actin meshwork was composed of short actin filaments distinct from the cytoplasmic long actin cables and was present between the chloroplasts and plasma membrane. The short actin filaments emerged from around the chloroplast periphery towards the center of chloroplast. Showing highly dynamic behavior, the chloroplast actin filaments (cp-actin filaments) were rapidly organized into meshwork on the chloroplast surface facing plasma membrane. The actin filament configuration on a chloroplast led to the formation of actin meshwork area in the cell as the chloroplasts arrived at and occupied the area. After establishment of the meshwork, cp-actin filaments were still highly dynamic, showing appearance, disappearance, severing and bundling of filaments. These results indicate that the cp-actin filaments have significant roles in the chloroplast movement and positioning in the cell.     

Novel protein-protein interaction family proteins involved in chloroplast movement response

To optimize photosynthetic activity, chloroplasts change their intracellular location in response to ambient light conditions; chloroplasts move toward low intensity light to maximize light capture and away from high intensity light to avoid photodamage. Although several proteins have been reported to be involved in chloroplast photorelocation movement response, any physical interaction among them was not found so far. We recently found a physical interaction between two plant-specific coiled-coil proteins, WEB1 (Weak Chloroplast Movement under Blue Light 1) and PMI2 (Plastid Movement Impaired 2), that were indentified to regulate chloroplast movement velocity. Since the both coiled-coil regions of WEB1 and PMI2 were classified into an uncharacterized protein family having DUF827 (DUF: Domain of Unknown Function) domain, it was the first report that DUF827 proteins could mediate protein-protein interaction. In this mini-review article, we discuss regarding molecular function of WEB1 and PMI2, and also define a novel protein family composed of WEB1, PMI2 and WEB1/PMI2-like proteins for protein-protein interaction in land plants.Key words: Arabidopsis, blue light, chloroplast velocity, coiled-coil region, organelle movement, phototropin, protein-protein interactionIntracellular locations of chloroplasts change in response to different light conditions to capture sunlight efficiently for energy production through photosynthesis. Chloroplasts move toward weak light to maximize light capture (the accumulation response),^1,2 and away from strong light to reduce photodamage (the avoidance response).³ In higher plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana, the responses are induced by blue light-dependent manner.^1,2 Recently, chloroplast actin (cp-actin) filaments were found to be involved in chloroplast photorelocation movement and positioning.^4,5 The cp-actin filaments are localized at the interface between the chloroplast and the plasma membrane to anchor the chloroplast to the plasma membrane, and are relocalized to the leading edge of chloroplasts before and during the movement.^4,5 The difference of cp-actin filament amounts between the front and the rear halves of chloroplasts determines the chloroplast movement velocity; as the difference increases, chloroplast velocity also increases.^4,5Several proteins have been reported to be involved in chloroplast movement. The blue light receptors, phototropin 1 (phot1) and phot2, mediate the accumulation response,⁶ and phot2 solely mediates the avoidance response.^7,8 Chloroplast Unusual Positioning 1 (CHUP1), Kinesin-like Protein for Actin-Based Chloroplast Movement 1 (KAC1) and KAC2 are involved in the cp-actin filament formation.^4,9–11 Other proteins with unknown molecular function involved in the chloroplast movement responses have also been reported. They are J-domain Protein Required for Chloroplast Accumulation Response 1 (JAC1),^12,13 Plastid Movement Impaired 1 (PMI1),¹⁴ a long coiled-coil protein Plastid Movement Impaired 2 (PMI2), a PMI2-homologous protein PMI15,¹⁵ and THRUMIN1.¹⁶Recently, we characterized two plant-specific coiled-coil proteins, Weak Chloroplast Movement under Blue Light 1 (WEB1) and PMI2, which regulate the velocity of chloroplast photorelocation movement.¹⁷ In this mini-review article, we discuss about molecular function of WEB1 and PMI2 in chloroplast photorelocation movement, and also define the WEB1/PMI2-related (WPR) protein family as a new protein family for protein-protein interaction.     

Structure and activity of JAC1 J-domain implicate the involvement of the cochaperone activity with HSC70 in chloroplast photorelocation movement

Chloroplast photorelocation movement towards weak light and away from strong light is essential for plants to adapt to the fluctuation of ambient light conditions. In the previous study, we showed that blue light receptor phototropins mediated blue light-induced chloroplast movement in Arabidopsis by regulating short actin filaments localized at the chloroplast periphery (cp-actin filaments) rather than actin cables in the cytoplasm. However, the signaling pathway for the chloroplast photorelocation movement is still unclear. We also identified JAC1 (J-domain protein required for chloroplast accumulation response 1) as an essential component for the accumulation response and dark positioning in Arabidopsis. We recently determined the crystal structure of the J-domain of JAC1. The JAC1 J-domain has a positively charged surface, which forms a putative interface with the Hsc70 chaperone by analogy to that of bovine auxilin. Furthermore, the mutation of the highly conserved HPD motif in the JAC1 J-domain impaired the in vivo activity of JAC1. These data suggest that JAC1 cochaperone activity with HSC70 is essential for chloroplast photorelocation movement.Key words: Arabidopsis, auxilin, blue light, clathrin, endocytosis, J-domain, organelle movement, phototropin     

Why have chloroplasts developed a unique motility system?

Organelle movement in plants is dependent on actin filaments with most of the organelles being transported along the actin cables by class XI myosins. Although chloroplast movement is also actin filament-dependent, a potential role of myosin motors in this process is poorly understood. Interestingly, chloroplasts can move in any direction and change the direction within short time periods, suggesting that chloroplasts use the newly formed actin filaments rather than preexisting actin cables. Furthermore, the data on myosin gene knockouts and knockdowns in Arabidopsis and tobacco do not support myosins'' XI role in chloroplast movement. Our recent studies revealed that chloroplast movement and positioning are mediated by the short actin filaments localized at chloroplast periphery (cp-actin filaments) rather than cytoplasmic actin cables. The accumulation of cp-actin filaments depends on kinesin-like proteins, KAC1 and KAC2, as well as on a chloroplast outer membrane protein CHUP1. We propose that plants evolved a myosin XI-independent mechanism of the actin-based chloroplast movement that is distinct from the mechanism used by other organelles.Key words: actin, Arabidopsis, blue light, kinesin, myosin, organelle movement, phototropinOrganelle movement and positioning are pivotal aspects of the intracellular dynamics in most eukaryotes. Although plants are sessile organisms, their organelles are quickly repositioned in response to fluctuating environmental conditions and certain endogenous signals. By and large, plant organelle movements and positioning are dependent on actin filaments, although microtubules play certain accessory roles in organelle dynamics.^1,2 Actin inhibitors effectively retard the movements of mitochondria,^3–6 peroxisomes,^5,7–11 Golgi stacks,^12,13 endoplasmic reticulum (ER),^14,15 and nuclei.^16–18 These organelles are co-aligned and associated with actin filaments.^{5,7,8,10–12,15,18} Recent progress in this field started to reveal the molecular motility system responsible for the organelle transport in plants.¹⁹Chloroplast movement is among the most fascinating models of organelle movement in plants because it is precisely controlled by ambient light conditions.^20,21 Weak light induces chloroplast accumulation response so that chloroplasts can capture photosynthetic light efficiently (Fig. 1A). Strong light induces chloroplast avoidance response to escape from photodamage (Fig. 1B).²² The blue light-induced chloroplast movement is mediated by the blue light receptor phototropin (phot). In some cryptogam plants, the red light-induced chloroplast movement is regulated by a chimeric phytochrome/phototropin photoreceptor neochrome.^23–25 In a model plant Arabidopsis, phot1 and phot2 function redundantly to regulate the accumulation response,²⁶ whereas phot2 alone is essential for the avoidance response.^27,28 Several additional factors regulating chloroplast movement were identified by analyses of Arabidopsis mutants deficient in chloroplast photorelocation.^29–32 In particular, identification of CHUP1 (chloroplast unusual positioning 1) revealed the connection between chloroplasts and actin filaments at the molecular level.²⁹ CHUP1 is a chloroplast outer membrane protein capable of interacting with F-actin, G-actin and profilin in vitro.^29,33,34 The chup1 mutant plants are defective in both the chloroplast movement and chloroplast anchorage to the plasma membrane,^22,29,33 suggesting that CHUP1 plays an important role in linking chloroplasts to the plasma membrane through the actin filaments. However, how chloroplasts move using the actin filaments and whether chloroplast movement utilizes the actin-based motility system similar to other organelle movements remained to be determined.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Schematic distribution patterns of chloroplasts in a palisade cell under different light conditions, weak (A) and strong (B) lights. Shown as a side view of mid-part of the cell and a top view with three different levels (i.e., top, middle and bottom of the cell). The cell was irradiated from the leaf surface shown as arrows. Weak light induces chloroplast accumulation response (A) and strong light induces the avoidance response (B).Here, we review the recent findings pointing to existence of a novel actin-based mechanisms for chloroplast movement and discuss the differences between the mechanism responsible for movement of chloroplasts and other organelles.     

Tubular actin filaments in tobacco guard cells

The dynamic remodeling of actin filaments in guard cells functions in stomatal movement regulation. In our previous study, we found that the stochastic dynamics of guard cell actin filaments play a role in chloroplast movement during stomatal movement. In our present study, we further found that tubular actin filaments were present in tobacco guard cells that express GFP-mouse talin; approximately 2.3 tubular structures per cell with a diameter and height in the range of 1–3 µm and 3–5 µm, respectively. Most of the tubular structures were found to be localized in the cytoplasm near the inner walls of the guard cells. Moreover, the tubular actin filaments altered their localization slowly in the guard cells of static stoma, but showed obvious remodeling, such as breakdown and re-formation, in moving guard cells. Tubular actin filaments were further found to be colocalized with the chloroplasts in guard cells, but their roles in stomatal movement regulation requires further investigation.Key words: actin dynamics, tubular actin filaments, chloroplast, guard cell, stomatal movementStomatal movement responses to surrounding environment are mediated by guard cell signaling.^1,2 Actin filaments within guard cells are dynamic cytoarchitectures and function in stomatal development and movement.³ Arrays of actin filaments in guard cells that are dependent on different stomatal apertures have also been reported in references ^4–7. For example, the random or longitudinal orientations of actin filaments in closed stomata change to a radial orientation or ring-like array after stomata opening.^5,6,8 The reorganization of the actin architecture during stomatal movement depends on the depolymerization and repolymerization of actin filaments in guard cells. In contrast to the traditional treadmill model of actin dynamic mechanisms, stochastic dynamics of actin have been revealed in plant cells, such as in the epidermal cells of hypocotyl and root, the pavement cells of Arabidopsis cotyledons, and the guard cells of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum).^9–11 In this alternative system, the short actin fragments generated from severed long filaments can link with each other to form longer filaments by end-joining activity. The actin regulatory proteins, Arp2/3 complex, capping protein and actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin, may also be involved in the stochastic dynamics of actin filaments.^12,13Using tobacco GFP-mouse talin expression lines, we have previously analyzed the stochastic dynamics of guard cell actin filaments and their roles in chloroplast displacement during stomatal movement.^6,11 We found from these analyses that another arrangement of actin filaments, i.e., tubular actin filaments, exists in the guard cells of these tobacco lines. We first found the circle-like actin filaments in 82% of the guard cells (counting 320 cells) in tobacco expressing GFPmouse talin when analyzing a single optical section (Fig. 1A). In a previous study of BY-2 cells expressing GFP-Lifeact labeled actin filaments, Smertenko et al. found similar structures, i.e., quoit-like structures or acquosomes in all of the plant tissues examined except growing root hairs.¹⁰ However, in our present analysis of serial sections, we determined that the circle-like actin filaments in the tobacco guard cells were long tubes (Fig. 1A), as the lengths (about 3–5 µm) of these structures were greater than their diameter (about 1–3 µm). Hence, we denoted these structures as tubular actin filaments to distinguish them from the circular conformations of actin filaments observed previously in other plant cell tissues.^10,14–19 About 2.3 of these tubular actin filaments were found per guard cell, which is less than the number of acquosomes reported in BY-2 cells (about 6.7 per cell).¹⁰ Analysis of serial optical sections at the z-axis revealed that the tubular actin filaments localize in the cytoplasm near the inner walls of the guard cells (Fig. 1B), which is similar to the distribution of chloroplasts in guard cells.¹¹ Longitudinal sections further revealed a colocalization of tubular actin filaments and chloroplasts (Fig. 1B).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Tubular actin filaments in the guard cells of a tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) line expressing GFP-mouse talin. (A) Optical-sections (interval, 1.5 µm) of guard cells in a moving stoma showing tubular actin filaments (arrow heads). Frames (a1) and (a2) are cross sections of 1.5-µm-picture through the yellow and red lines, respectively, revealing the cross section of the circle structures are parallel lines (arrows). (B) Optical-sections of a stoma from the outer periclinal walls to the inner walls of the guard cells (interval, 1 µm). The tubular actin filaments (arrow heads) are localized in the cytoplasm near to the inner periclinal walls of guard cells. Frame (b1) is the guard cell on the right of the frame “4 µm”; (b2) is the cross section of b1 through the red line; and (b3) is a higher magnification image of the area encompassed by the white square in b2. Arrows indicate the colocalization between the tubular actin filaments and the chloroplast (indicated using a red pseudocolor). (C) Time-series imaging showing the movement of tubular actin filaments in the guard cells of static stomata. Frame (c1) comprises three images colored red (0 S), green (40 S) and blue (80 S), that are merged in a single frame to show the translocation of the tubular actin filaments (arrows). (D) Time-series images of the opening stomata showing the breakdown (arrows) and re-formation (arrowheads) of the tubular actin filaments. All images were captured using a Zeiss LSM 510 META confocal laser scanning microscope, as described by Wang et al.¹¹ Bars, 10 µm.We performed time-lapse imaging and found that the translocation of tubular actin filaments is slow in static stomata in which the distance between two tubular actin filaments typically increased from 2.22 to 2.50 µm after 80 sec (Fig. 1C). In moving stomata, however, the tubular actin filaments showed an obvious dynamic reorganization whereby they could be processed into short fragments and also reemerged after they had disintegrated (Fig. 1D). These results indicate that tubular actin filaments have stochastic dynamics that are similar to the long actin filaments of guard cells.¹¹ In our previous study, we found that the stochastic dynamics of actin filaments correlate with light-induced chloroplast movement in guard cells.¹¹ However, whether the dynamics of the tubular actin filaments are also involved in chloroplast movement during stomatal movement remains to be investigated. In cultured mesophyll cells which had been mechanically isolated from Zinnia elegans, Wilsen et al. previously found a close association between fully closed actin rings and chloroplasts.¹⁸ These authors further found that the average percentage of cells with free actin rings increased at the initial culture stage, and then decreased, which indicates that the formation of actin rings might be a response of the actin cytoskeleton to cellular stress or disturbance.¹⁸ The turgor pressure of guard cells is the fundamental basis of stomatal movement leading to changes in the shape, volume, wall structure, and membrane surface of guard cells.^20–24 We speculate from our current data that there is a relationship between tubular actin filaments and the shape changes of guard cells during stomatal movement.     

Rapid Severing and Motility of Chloroplast-Actin Filaments Are Required for the Chloroplast Avoidance Response in Arabidopsis

Phototropins (phot1 and phot2 in Arabidopsis thaliana) relay blue light intensity information to the chloroplasts, which move toward weak light (the accumulation response) and away from strong light (the avoidance response). Chloroplast-actin (cp-actin) filaments are vital for mediating these chloroplast photorelocation movements. In this report, we examine in detail the cp-actin filament dynamics by which the chloroplast avoidance response is regulated. Although stochastic dynamics of cortical actin fragments are observed on the chloroplasts, the basic mechanisms underlying the disappearance (including severing and turnover) of the cp-actin filaments are regulated differently from those of cortical actin filaments. phot2 plays a pivotal role in the strong blue light–induced severing and random motility of cp-actin filaments, processes that are therefore essential for asymmetric cp-actin formation for the avoidance response. In addition, phot2 functions in the bundling of cp-actin filaments that is induced by dark incubation. By contrast, the function of phot1 is dispensable for these responses. Our findings suggest that phot2 is the primary photoreceptor involved in the rapid reorganization of cp-actin filaments that allows chloroplasts to change direction rapidly and control the velocity of the avoidance movement according to the light’s intensity and position.     

Influence of calcium on blue-light-induced chloroplast movement in Lemna trisulca L.

The presence of calcium is essential for chloroplast movement induced by blue light in Lemna trisulca L. The regulatory role of calcium was confirmed by the inhibition of chloroplast movement by cytochalasin B and trifluoperazine. The calcium concentration in tissues was modified by ethylene glycol-bis(2-aminoethylether)-N,N,N, N-tetraacetic acid (EGTA), the calcium ionophore A23187 and La³⁺. Only a long period of incubation (12h) in EGTA or La³⁺ caused distrubances in chloroplast movement. This indicates that calcium influx is not essential for chloroplast movement. Those conditions that dramatically changed the internal calcium concentration, either applications of calcium ionophore A23187 and EGTA, or ionophore and La³⁺, markedly decreased the amplitude of response to blue-light pulses. This demonstrates that disturbances of chloroplast movement are observable only when internal stores of calcium are affected by Ca²⁺-antagonists. We suggest that the calcium involved in blue-light-induced chloroplast movement is derived from intracellular stores. The addition of Mg²⁺ to EGTA buffer counteracted its effect, indicating that Mg²⁺, as well as Ca²⁺, might possibly be involved in chloroplast movement.Abbreviations EGTA ethylene glycol-bis(2-aminoethylether)-N,N,N,N-tetraacetic acid - Hepes 4(2-hydroxyethyl-1-piperazine) ethanesulfonic acid - A23187 calcium ionophore We express our gratitude to Professor W. Korohoda for valuable critical comments on this paper and stimulating discussion. We also thank Mr. P. Malec for help in preparing the experiment with trifluoperazine and Mr. A. Waloszek for taking the photographs. We are indebted to Mr. Tim Kline (International House, Krakow, Poland) for improving the English style. This research was supported by grant No. 1042/P2/92/03 from the State Committe for Scientific Research.     

Dynamic changes in the actin cytoskeleton during the high-fluence rate response of theMougeotia chloroplast

Summary Since photo-induced orientation movement of a single, ribbon-shaped chloroplast in each cell of the filamentous green algaMougeotia is inhibited in the presence of cytochalasin B, actin is thought to be involved in the process of chloroplast movements. However, this possibility remains to be proved. A specific class of cytoplasmic filaments, which emerge from the advancing front of the moving chloroplast, can be seen by differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy. However, no one has yet succeeded in defining the nature of these filaments. We have been able to stain the actin filaments (AFs) associated with the moving chloroplast with fluorescein-conjugated phalloidin (FP) after pre-treatment withm-maleimidobenzoyl N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (MBS). No filamentous structures were observed in cells that had been pre-irradiated with low-fluence rate red light. However, transversely oriented fluorescent filaments appeared at the front edge of the moving chloroplast when it began to rotate under irradiation with high-fluence rate white light. These filaments disappeared after completion of the orientation movement, suggesting the simultaneous appearance of AFs and the orientation movement of the chloroplast. Thick cytoplasmic strands connecting the edge of the chloroplast with the parietal cytoplasm were often seen by DIC microscopy before and after completion of the high-fluence rate orientation movement. These thick cytoplasmic strands could not be stained by FP, but were often stained by 3,3-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide (DiOC₆(3)), suggesting that they are transvacuolar strands that include endoplasmic reticulum.     

Integrated role of ROS and Ca<Superscript>+2</Superscript> in blue light-induced chloroplast avoidance movement in leaves of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Hydrilla verticillata</Emphasis> (L.f.) Royle

Directional chloroplast photorelocation is a major physio-biochemical mechanism that allows these organelles to realign themselves intracellularly in response to the intensity of the incident light as an adaptive response. Signaling processes involved in blue light (BL)-dependent chloroplast movements were investigated in Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle leaves. Treatments with antagonists of actin filaments [2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA)] and microtubules (oryzalin) revealed that actin filaments, but not microtubules, play a pivotal role in chloroplast movement. Involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in controlling chloroplast avoidance movement has been demonstrated, as exogenous H₂O₂ not only accelerated chloroplast avoidance but also could induce chloroplast avoidance even in weak blue light (WBL). Further support came from experiments with different ROS scavengers, i.e., dimethylthiourea (DMTU), KI, and CuCl₂, which inhibited chloroplast avoidance, and from ROS localization using specific stains. Such avoidance was also partially inhibited by ZnCl₂, an inhibitor of NADPH oxidase (NOX) as well as 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU), a photosynthetic electron transport chain (ETC) inhibitor at PS II. However, methyl viologen (MV), a PS I ETC inhibitor, rather accelerated avoidance response. Exogenous calcium (Ca⁺²) induced avoidance even in WBL while inhibited chloroplast accumulation partially. On the other hand, chloroplast movements (both accumulation and avoidance) were blocked by Ca⁺² antagonists, La³⁺ (inhibitor of plasma membrane Ca⁺² channel) and ethylene glycol-bis(2-aminoethylether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid (EGTA, Ca⁺² chelator) while LiCl that affects Ca⁺² release from endosomal compartments did not show any effect. A model on integrated role of ROS and Ca⁺² (influx from apolastic space) in actin-mediated chloroplast avoidance has been proposed.     

The reorganization of actin filaments is required for vacuolar fusion of guard cells during stomatal opening in Arabidopsis

The reorganization of actin filaments (AFs) and vacuoles in guard cells is involved in the regulation of stomatal movement. However, it remains unclear whether there is any interaction between the reorganization of AFs and vacuolar changes during stomatal movement. Here, we report the relationship between the reorganization of AFs and vacuolar fusion revealed in pharmacological experiments, and characterizing stomatal opening in actin‐related protein 2 (arp2) and arp3 mutants. Our results show that cytochalasin‐D‐induced depolymerization or phalloidin‐induced stabilization of AFs leads to an increase in small unfused vacuoles during stomatal opening in wild‐type (WT) Arabidopsis plants. Light‐induced stomatal opening is retarded and vacuolar fusion in guard cells is impaired in the mutants, in which the reorganization and the dynamic parameters of AFs are aberrant compared with those of the WT. In WT, AFs tightly surround the small separated vacuoles, forming a ring that encircles the boundary membranes of vacuoles partly fused during stomatal opening. In contrast, in the mutants, most AFs and actin patches accumulate abnormally around the nuclei of the guard cells, which probably further impair vacuolar fusion and retard stomatal opening. Our results suggest that the reorganization of AFs regulates vacuolar fusion in guard cells during stomatal opening.     

Identification of calmodulin in the green alga Mougeotia and its possible function in chloroplast reorientational movement

A soluble protein was isolated from Mougeotia by chloropromazine-sepharose 4 B affinity chromatography. The protein matches the properties of calmodulin in terms of heat stability, Ca²⁺-dependent electrophoretic mobility in sodium-dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gels, and its ability to activate cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase in a Ca²⁺-dependent manner. Phytochrome-mediated chloroplast reorientational movement in Mougeotia was inhibited by the calmodulin antagonist trifluoperazine, a hydrophobic compound, or N-(6-aminohexyl)-5-chloro-1-naphthalenesulfonamide (W-7), a hydrophilic compound; 50% inhibition (IC₅₀) of chloroplast movement is caused by 20–50 mol l^-1 trifluoperazine or 100 mol l^-1 W-7. The Ca²⁺-calmodulin may act as an intermediate in the chloroplast reorientational response in Mougeotia governed by phytochrome.Abbreviations EGTA ethylene glycol-bis(-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N,N-tetraacetic acid - SDS sodium dodecyl sulfate - W-7 N-(6-aminohexyl)-5-chloro-1-naphthalene sulfonamide     

Blue-light-induced reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and the avoidance response of chloroplasts in epidermal cells of<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Vallisneria gigantea</Emphasis>

In leaf epidermal cells of the aquatic angiosperm Vallisneria gigantea Graebner, high-intensity blue light induces the actin-dependent avoidance response of chloroplasts. By semi-quantitative motion analysis and phalloidin staining, time courses of the blue-light-induced changes in the mode of movement of individual chloroplasts and in the configuration of actin filaments were examined in the presence and absence of a flavoprotein inhibitor, diphenylene iodonium. In dark-adapted cells, short, thick actin bundles seemed to surround each chloroplast, which was kept motionless in the outer periclinal cytoplasm of the cells. After 10 min of irradiation with high-intensity blue light, a rapid, unidirectional movement of chloroplasts was induced, concomitant with the appearance of aggregated, straight actin bundles stretched over the outer periclinal cytoplasm. Diphenylene iodonium inhibited the avoidance response of chloroplasts, apparently by delaying a change in the mode of chloroplast movement from random sway to unidirectional migration, by suppressing the appearance of aggregated, straight actin bundles. In partially irradiated individual cells, redistribution of chloroplasts and reorganization of actin filaments occurred only in the areas exposed to blue light. From the results, we propose that the short, thick actin bundles in the vicinity of chloroplasts function to anchor the chloroplasts in dark-adapted cells, and that the aggregated, straight actin bundles organized under blue-light irradiation provide tracks for unidirectional movement of chloroplasts.Preliminary results of part of the local irradiation study have already been reported in abstract form [N. Sakurai et al. (2002) J Photosci 9:326–328].     

Involvement of actin filaments in chloroplast division of the algaClosterium ehrenbergii

Summary Studies have been made of whether actin filaments and microtubules are involved in the chloroplast division ofClosterium ehrenbergii (Conjugatae). Fluorostaining with rhodamine-phalloidin showed 5 types of localization of F-actin: (1) cables of actin filaments running in the cortical cytoplasm along the cell's long axis, (2) condensed actin filaments at the septum, (3) perinuclear distribution of actin filaments, (4) F-actins in a marking pin-like configuration adjacent to the nucleus of semicells just before completion of chloroplast kinesis, and (5) actin filaments girdling the isthmus of the constricted and dividing chloroplasts. Cytochalasin D (CD) at a concentration of 6 to 25 M caused significant disruption of actin filaments and the arrest of chloroplast kinesis, nuclear division, septum formation and cytoplasmic streaming within 3 to 6h. Chloroplast kinesis and cytoplasmic streaming recovered when cells were transferred to the medium without CD after CD treatment, or were subjected to prolonged contact with CD for more than 9h. In these cells there was a coincidental reappearance of actin filaments. A tubulin inhibitor, amiprophos-methyl at 330 M, did not inhibit chloroplast kinesis but did inhibit division and positioning of the nucleus. These results suggest that actin filaments do play a role in the mechanism of chloroplast kinesis but that microtubules do not appear to be involved in the process.Abbreviations APM amiprophos-methyl - CD cytochalasin D - DAPI 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole - DIC Nomarski differential interference contrast - DMSO dimethyl sulfoxide - Rh-Ph rhodamine-phalloidin     

Is chloroplast import of photosynthesis proteins facilitated by an actin-TOC-TIC-VIPP1 complex?

Actin filaments are major components of the cytoskeleton that interact with chloroplast envelope membranes to allow chloroplast positioning and movement, stromule mobility and gravitropism perception. We recently reported that Toc159, a component of the TOC complex of the chloroplast protein import apparatus, interacts directly with actin. The interaction of Toc159 and actin was identified by co-immunoprecipitation and co-sedimentation experiments with detergent-solubilised pea chloroplast envelope membranes. In addition, many of the components of the TOC-TIC protein import apparatus and VIPP1 (vesicle-inducing protein in plastids 1) were identified by mass spectroscopy in the material co-immunoprecipitated with antibodies to actin. Toc159 is the receptor for the import of photosynthesis proteins and VIPP1 is involved in thylakoid membrane formation by inducing vesicle formation from the chloroplast inner envelope membrane, suggesting we may have identified an actin-TOCTIC-VIPP1 complex that may provide a means of channeling cytosolic preproteins to the thylakoid membrane. The interaction of Toc159 with actin may facilitate exchange between the putative soluble and membrane forms of Toc159 and promote the interaction of cytosolic preproteins with the TOC complex.Key words: actin, chloroplast, protein import, TOC complex, TIC complex, VIPP1Actin is a ubiquitous protein of eukaryotic cells and a major component of the cytoskeleton as microfilaments. In plant cells, plastids are closely associated with actin microfilaments.^1,2 A direct interaction of plastids with the actin cytoskeleton has been postulated to anchor chloroplasts at appropriate intracellular positions,³ to support chloroplast light-intensitydependent movement,⁴ to facilitate plastid stromule (stroma-filled tubule) mobility^5,6 and to participate in gravity perception.⁷ The known proteins implicated in plastid-actin interaction are CHUP1 (chloroplast unusual positioning 1), a protein exclusively targeted to the chloroplast outer envelope membrane that is essential for chloroplast anchorage to the plasma membrane,⁸ and myosin XI proteins that play a role in stromule movement9 and in gravitropism.^10,11 Recently, we found that Toc159 also interacts with actin.¹²Toc159 is a component of the TOC complex, which is part of the chloroplast protein translocation apparatus. This apparatus consists of two membrane protein complexes that associate to allow translocation of nucleus-encoded proteins from the cytoplasm to the interior stromal compartment (reviewed in ref. ¹³). The translocon at the outer envelope membrane of chloroplasts (TOC complex) mediates the initial recognition of preproteins and their translocation across the outer membrane.¹⁴ The translocon at the inner envelope membrane of chloroplasts (TIC complex) physically associates with the TOC complex and provides the membrane translocation channel for the inner membrane. In addition, the TOC and TIC complexes interact with a set of molecular chaperones (ClpC and Hsp70), which assist the transfer of imported proteins^15–17 (Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Schematic diagram of Toc159-actin interactions and the import of photosynthesis proteins. Toc159, linked to actin by its A-domain, recruits a newly synthesized photosynthesis preprotein by its G-domain. Actin filaments facilitate Toc159 movement to the chloroplast outer envelope membrane for integration into the TOC complex. The core TOC complex is formed by Toc159, Toc34 and Toc75. Tic22 acts to facilitate the passage of preproteins across the intermembrane space and interacts with the TIC complex. The core TIC complex is composed of Tic110, Tic20 and/or Tic21, and Tic40. The Tic110 protein recruits stromal molecular chaperone ClpC. On arrival in the stroma, the transit peptide is cleaved by SPP, and other chaperones (Hsp90 or Hsp70) may assist in the folding. VIPP1 interacts with the chaperones and polymerises, inducing chloroplast inner envelope membrane budding, leading to thylakoid formation.The interaction between actin and Toc159 was identified by co-immunoprecipitation and co-sedimentation experiments with detergent-solubilised pea chloroplast envelope membranes, and confirmed with Toc159 expressed in Escherichia coli. In addition, many other components of the TOC-TIC protein import apparatus were co-immunoprecipitated by antibodies to actin and co-sedimented with added F-actin filaments.¹² Using mass spectrometry, we identified the principal components of the TOC complex (Toc159, Toc75 and Toc34) and three accepted components of the TIC core complex (Tic110, Tic40 and ClpC). The presence of Tic20/21 and Tic22 could not be examined because they migrate in the same position on SDS-PAGE as the light chains of antibody molecules but, since they are involved in linking the TOC and TIC complexes,⁶ they may also be part of the complex with actin.The identification of the region of Toc159 that interacts with actin is an important feature to help establish whether any of the other Toc159 isoforms (such as Toc132 and Toc120) are likely to interact with actin. Toc159 family proteins are composed of three different domains: the A (acidic) domain, the G (GTPase) domain and the M (membrane) domain.¹⁸ The interaction of Toc159 with actin appears most likely to be through the A-domain; the G-domain did not co-sediment with actin filaments¹² and the M-domain is embedded in the chloroplast envelope outer membrane and therefore is unlikely to be accessible to actin. Toc132 and Toc120 have shorter A-domains than Toc159 and this may affect their ability to bind actin. Although all the Toc159 isoforms are implicated in chloroplast protein import, Toc132 and Toc120 are involved in the import of chloroplast housekeeping proteins and Toc159 is specialized for the import of photosynthesis proteins.¹⁸ For import of photosynthesis proteins, two models have been proposed for preprotein recognition by the TOC complex: the ‘targeting model’ where the newly synthesized preprotein is first bound by a free cytosolic form of Toc159, and the ‘motor model’ where the transit peptide is first phosphorylated and then bound to Toc34 associated with the other TOC subunits in the outer envelope membrane.¹³ In support of the first model, Toc159 has been reported to exist in both cytosolic and membrane-bound forms^19,20 and the soluble form of Toc159 is able to bind preproteins.^20,21 Toc159 is proposed to be the major point of contact for preproteins during the early stages of protein import through its A-domain.²² The interaction of Toc159 with actin might provide a means to favor exchange between the putative soluble and membrane forms of Toc159 and potentially facilitate chloroplast photosynthesis protein import (Fig. 1).Several features of this model require additional experimental evidence. The involvement of a soluble form of Toc159 is highly controversial,¹³ and evidence for a physiological role in vivo is required. Experimental evidence for a facilitating role of the actin cytoskeleton in chloroplast protein import is also required. Does the presence of a basket of actin filaments surrounding the chloroplasts² provide a means of concentrating cytosolic Toc159 in the vicinity of the chloroplasts? Or do actin filaments provide a trackway for movement of Toc159 to or from chloroplasts? Myosin, the motor protein for movement along actin filaments, was not detected in the co-immunoprecipitated complex, but this does not necessarily rule out its involvement.VIPP1 was also identified in the complex with actin. VIPP1 is involved in thylakoid membrane formation by vesicle formation from the chloroplast inner envelope membrane²³ and the quantity of thylakoid membrane proteins is closely correlated to the amount of VIPP1 in chloroplasts.²⁴ VIPP1 is also known to interact with Hsp70 and Hsp90 chaperones^25–27 and these chaperones may associate with the stromal face of the TIC complex to support protein folding.¹⁵ This raises the possibility that an actin-TOC-TIC-VIPP1 complex may facilitate thylakoid formation by channeling the import of thylakoid-located photosynthesis proteins through the chloroplast envelope membrane into vesicles directed to the thylakoid membrane (Fig. 1).Our study of actin-binding proteins in the chloroplast envelope membrane may have provided an initial glimpse at previously unrecognized mechanisms facilitating the import of photosynthesis proteins by chloroplasts. The formation of an actin-TOC-TIC-VIPP1 complex may provide a means of channeling cytosolic preproteins to the thylakoid membrane.     

Phytochrome- and blue-light-absorbing pigment-mediated directional movement of chloroplasts in dark-adapted prothallial cells of fernAdiantum as analyzed by microbeam irradiation

When prothalli ofAdiantum capillus-veneris L. were kept for 2 d in the dark, chloroplasts gathered along the anticlinal walls (Kagawa and Wada, 1994, J Plant Res 107: 389–398). In these dark-adapted prothallial cells, irradiation with a microbeam (10 gm in diameter) of red (R) or blue light (B) for 60 s moved the chloroplasts towards the irradiated locus during a subsequent dark period. Chloroplasts located less than 20 gm from the center of the R microbeam (18 J·m^–2) moved towards the irradiated locus. The higher the fluence of the light, the greater the distance from which chloroplasts could be attracted. The B microbeam was less effective than the R microbeam. Chloroplasts started to move anytime up to 20 min after the R stimulus, but with the B microbeam the effect of the stimulus was usually apparent within 10 min after irradiation. The velocity of chloroplast migration was independent of light-fluence in both R and B and was about - 0.3 m·min^–1 between 15 min and 30 min after irradiation. Whole-cell irradiation with far-red light immediately after R- and B-microbeam irradiations demonstrated that these responses were mediated by phytochrome and a blue-light-absorbing pigment, respectively. Sequential treatment with R and B microbeams, whose fluence rates were less than the threshold values when applied separately, resulted in an additive effect and induced chloroplast movement, strongly suggesting that signals from phytochrome and the blue-light-absorbing pigment could interact at some point before the induction of chloroplast movement.Abbreviations B blue light - FR far-red light - IR infrared light - R red light     

Differential Protein Phosphorylation Regulates Chloroplast Movement in Response to Strong Light and Darkness in Arabidopsis thaliana

Phototropin-dependent chloroplast movement is essential to the photosynthetic acclimation of mesophyll cells to incident light. Chloroplast movement involves many cellular actors, such as chloroplast-associated actin filaments and proteins that mediate signalling between phototropins and chloroplast motion. In the past few years, genetic approaches have identified several key proteins but the intrinsic mechanisms of the signalling cascade, such as phosphorylation events, remain undefined. Here, we took advantage of phosphoproteomics to examine the involvement of protein phosphorylation in chloroplast movement in darkness or under high light, at different CO₂ mole fractions (100, 380 or 1,000 ppm) to vary photosynthetic activity. Amongst the 100 relevant identified phosphopeptides, 19 (corresponding to 8 proteins) were differentially phosphorylated in darkness vs. high light. There was no significant CO₂ effect on the observed phosphorylation patterns. We further characterized the phosphorylation sites in THRUMIN1, which is believed to be crucial for the attachment of chloroplast-associated actin filaments to the plasma membrane and thus for chloroplast movements. The mutant thrumin1 was complemented with a mutated protein in which phospho-sites were substituted to a phosphomimetic (Asp) or a non-phosphorylatable (Ala) residue. While the phosphomimetic substitution altered the chloroplast response in the light only, both light and dark responses were altered with the non-phosphorylatable substitution. Our data suggest a key role of protein phosphorylation, including that of THRUMIN1, in the light/dark control of chloroplast movements.     

Interaction of Actin and the Chloroplast Protein Import Apparatus

Actin filaments are major components of the cytoskeleton and play numerous essential roles, including chloroplast positioning and plastid stromule movement, in plant cells. Actin is present in pea chloroplast envelope membrane preparations and is localized at the surface of the chloroplasts, as shown by agglutination of intact isolated chloroplasts by antibodies to actin. To identify chloroplast envelope proteins involved in actin binding, we have carried out actin co-immunoprecipitation and co-sedimentation experiments on detergent-solubilized pea chloroplast envelope membranes. Proteins co-immunoprecipitated with actin were identified by mass spectrometry and by Western blotting and included the Toc159, Toc75, Toc34, and Tic110 components of the TOC-TIC protein import apparatus. A direct interaction of actin with Escherichia coli-expressed Toc159, but not Toc33, was shown by co-sedimentation experiments, suggesting that Toc159 is the component of the TOC complex that interacts with actin on the cytosolic side of the outer envelope membrane. The physiological significance of this interaction is unknown, but it may play a role in the import of nuclear-encoded photosynthesis proteins.Actin is a ubiquitous protein of eukaryotic cells. Actin microfilaments are formed from polymerization of actin monomers and are a major component of the cytoskeleton. In plant cells, actin microfilaments are arranged in longitudinal arrays of thick actin bundles with randomly oriented thin actin filaments extending from the bundles (1). Chloroplasts are either aligned along the actin bundles or closely associated with the fine filaments and are surrounded by baskets of actin microfilaments (1, 2). A direct interaction of chloroplasts with the actin cytoskeleton has been postulated to anchor chloroplasts at appropriate intracellular positions (3). Chloroplast movement depends on cytosolic actin filaments and is stimulated by high light intensity (4). A chloroplast envelope protein involved in blue light-dependent chloroplast repositioning has been identified by the analysis of the Arabidopsis chup1 (chloroplast unusual positioning 1) mutant, which was unable to relocate its chloroplasts under high light stimulation (5). CHUP1 is a protein exclusively targeted to the chloroplast outer envelope membrane that is essential for chloroplast anchorage to the plasma membrane (6). CHUP1 interacts with actin and profilin, a modulator of actin polymerization, and it may play a regulatory role in actin polymerization during chloroplast photo-relocation (7).The interaction of amyloplasts with the actin cytoskeleton has been implicated in gravity perception and signal transduction. Several models for the role of the actin cytoskeleton have been proposed (8), but the nature of the interaction is not known. However, disruption of the actin cytoskeleton enhanced sedimentation of amyloplasts and promoted gravitropism (9, 10), and a role for myosin has been proposed on the basis of inhibitor experiments (11).The actin cytoskeleton and myosin have also been implicated in plastid stromule movement. Stromules (stroma-filled tubules) are highly dynamic tubular structures extending from the surface of all plastid types (12, 13). Stromules are delimited by the inner and outer plastid envelope membranes, which are closely associated (for a review, see Refs. 12 and 13). Experiments with inhibitors of microfilament- and microtubule-based movement suggested that stromules move along actin microfilaments powered by the ATPase activity of myosin motors (14). Physical connection between the envelope membranes seems likely to be required to provide a means of coordinating the movement of the inner envelope membrane with the microfilament-associated outer envelope membrane. There is evidence for direct connection of the inner and outer envelope membranes at contact sites, which support protein translocation through the protein import apparatus (15, 16). This apparatus consists of two membrane protein complexes that associate to allow translocation of nucleus-encoded proteins from the cytoplasm to the interior stromal compartment (for a review, see 17). The translocon at the outer envelope membrane of chloroplasts (TOC complex)² mediates the initial recognition of preproteins and their translocation across the outer membrane (18). The translocon at the inner envelope membrane of chloroplasts (TIC complex) physically associates with the TOC complex and provides the membrane translocation channel for the inner membrane. In addition, the TOC and TIC complexes interact with a set of molecular chaperones, which assist the transfer of imported proteins (19–21).With the aim of identifying components involved in the interaction of the chloroplast envelope with the actin cytoskeleton, we have used actin co-immunoprecipitation and co-sedimentation experiments with detergent-solubilized pea chloroplast envelope membranes. Components of the TOC-TIC protein import apparatus have been identified by mass spectrometry and Western blotting, and a direct interaction of Escherichia coli-expressed Toc159 with actin was demonstrated by co-sedimentation. This interaction may have a so far unrecognized physiological role in chloroplast protein import.     

PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED1 and PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED1-RELATED1 Mediate Photorelocation Movements of Both Chloroplasts and Nuclei

Organelle movement and positioning play important roles in fundamental cellular activities and adaptive responses to environmental stress in plants. To optimize photosynthetic light utilization, chloroplasts move toward weak blue light (the accumulation response) and escape from strong blue light (the avoidance response). Nuclei also move in response to strong blue light by utilizing the light-induced movement of attached plastids in leaf cells. Blue light receptor phototropins and several factors for chloroplast photorelocation movement have been identified through molecular genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED1 (PMI1) is a plant-specific C2-domain protein that is required for efficient chloroplast photorelocation movement. There are two PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED1-RELATED (PMIR) genes, PMIR1 and PMIR2, in the Arabidopsis genome. However, the mechanism in which PMI1 regulates chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements and the involvement of PMIR1 and PMIR2 in these organelle movements remained unknown. Here, we analyzed chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements in mutant lines of PMI1, PMIR1, and PMIR2. In mesophyll cells, the pmi1 single mutant showed severe defects in both chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements resulting from the impaired regulation of chloroplast-actin filaments. In pavement cells, pmi1 mutant plants were partially defective in both plastid and nuclear photorelocation movements, but pmi1pmir1 and pmi1pmir1pmir2 mutant lines lacked the blue light-induced movement responses of plastids and nuclei completely. These results indicated that PMI1 is essential for chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements in mesophyll cells and that both PMI1 and PMIR1 are indispensable for photorelocation movements of plastids and thus, nuclei in pavement cells.In plants, organelles move within the cell and become appropriately positioned to accomplish their functions and adapt to the environment (for review, see Wada and Suetsugu, 2004). Light-induced chloroplast movement (chloroplast photorelocation movement) is one of the best characterized organelle movements in plants (Suetsugu and Wada, 2012). Under weak light conditions, chloroplasts move toward light to capture light efficiently (the accumulation response; Zurzycki, 1955). Under strong light conditions, chloroplasts escape from light to avoid photodamage (the avoidance response; Kasahara et al., 2002; Sztatelman et al., 2010; Davis and Hangarter, 2012; Cazzaniga et al., 2013). In most green plant species, these responses are induced primarily by the blue light receptor phototropin (phot) in response to a range of wavelengths from UVA to blue light (approximately 320–500 nm; for review, see Suetsugu and Wada, 2012; Wada and Suetsugu, 2013; Kong and Wada, 2014). Phot-mediated chloroplast movement has been shown in land plants, such as Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Jarillo et al., 2001; Kagawa et al., 2001; Sakai et al., 2001), the fern Adiantum capillus-veneris (Kagawa et al., 2004), the moss Physcomitrella patens (Kasahara et al., 2004), and the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha (Komatsu et al., 2014). Two phots in Arabidopsis, phot1 and phot2, redundantly mediate the accumulation response (Sakai et al., 2001), whereas phot2 primarily regulates the avoidance response (Jarillo et al., 2001; Kagawa et al., 2001; Luesse et al., 2010). M. polymorpha has only one phot that mediates both the accumulation and avoidance responses (Komatsu et al., 2014), although two or more phots mediate chloroplast photorelocation movement in A. capillus-veneris (Kagawa et al., 2004) and P. patens (Kasahara et al., 2004). Thus, duplication and functional diversification of PHOT genes have occurred during land plant evolution, and plants have gained a sophisticated light sensing system for chloroplast photorelocation movement.In general, movements of plant organelles, including chloroplasts, are dependent on actin filaments (for review, see Wada and Suetsugu, 2004). Most organelles common in eukaryotes, such as mitochondria, peroxisomes, and Golgi bodies, use the myosin motor for their movements, but there is no clear evidence that chloroplast movement is myosin dependent (for review, see Suetsugu et al., 2010a). Land plants have innovated a novel actin-based motility system that is specialized for chloroplast movement as well as a photoreceptor system (for review, see Suetsugu et al., 2010a; Wada and Suetsugu, 2013; Kong and Wada, 2014). Chloroplast-actin (cp-actin) filaments, which were first found in Arabidopsis, are short actin filaments specifically localized around the chloroplast periphery at the interface between the chloroplast and the plasma membrane (Kadota et al., 2009). Strong blue light induces the rapid disappearance of cp-actin filaments and then, their subsequent reappearance preferentially at the front region of the moving chloroplasts. This asymmetric distribution of cp-actin filaments is essential for directional chloroplast movement (Kadota et al., 2009; Kong et al., 2013a). The greater the difference in the amount of cp-actin filaments between the front and rear regions of chloroplasts becomes, the faster the chloroplasts move, in which the magnitude of the difference is determined by fluence rate (Kagawa and Wada, 2004; Kadota et al., 2009; Kong et al., 2013a). Strong blue light-induced disappearance of cp-actin filaments is regulated in a phot2-dependent manner before the intensive polymerization of cp-actin filaments at the front region occurs (Kadota et al., 2009; Ichikawa et al., 2011; Kong et al., 2013a). This phot2-dependent response contributes to the greater difference in the amount of cp-actin filaments between the front and rear regions of chloroplasts. Similar behavior of cp-actin filaments has also been observed in A. capillus-veneris (Tsuboi and Wada, 2012) and P. patens (Yamashita et al., 2011).Like chloroplasts, nuclei also show light-mediated movement and positioning (nuclear photorelocation movement) in land plants (for review, see Higa et al., 2014b). In gametophytic cells of A. capillus-veneris, weak light induced the accumulation responses of both chloroplasts and nuclei, whereas strong light induced avoidance responses (Kagawa and Wada, 1993, 1995; Tsuboi et al., 2007). However, in mesophyll cells of Arabidopsis, strong blue light induced both chloroplast and nuclear avoidance responses, but weak blue light induced only the chloroplast accumulation response (Iwabuchi et al., 2007, 2010; Higa et al., 2014a). In Arabidopsis pavement cells, small numbers of tiny plastids were found and showed autofluorescence under the confocal laser-scanning microscopy (Iwabuchi et al., 2010; Higa et al., 2014a). Hereafter, the plastid in the pavement cells is called the pavement cell plastid. Strong blue light-induced avoidance responses of pavement cell plastids and nuclei were induced in a phot2-dependent manner, but the accumulation response was not detected for either organelle (Iwabuchi et al., 2007, 2010; Higa et al., 2014a). In both Arabidopsis and A. capillus-veneris, phots mediate nuclear photorelocation movement, and phot2 mediates the nuclear avoidance response (Iwabuchi et al., 2007, 2010; Tsuboi et al., 2007). The nuclear avoidance response is dependent on actin filaments in both mesophyll and pavement cells of Arabidopsis (Iwabuchi et al., 2010). Recently, it was shown that the nuclear avoidance response relies on cp-actin-dependent movement of pavement cell plastids, where nuclei are associated with pavement cell plastids of Arabidopsis (Higa et al., 2014a). In mesophyll cells, nuclear avoidance response is likely dependent on cp-actin filament-mediated chloroplast movement, because the mutants deficient in chloroplast movement were also defective in nuclear avoidance response (Higa et al., 2014a). Thus, phots mediate both chloroplast (and pavement cell plastid) and nuclear photorelocation movement by regulating cp-actin filaments.Molecular genetic analyses of Arabidopsis mutants deficient in chloroplast photorelocation movement have identified many molecular factors involved in signal transduction and/or motility systems as well as those involved in the photoreceptor system for chloroplast photorelocation movement (and thus, nuclear photorelocation movement; for review, see Suetsugu and Wada, 2012; Wada and Suetsugu, 2013; Kong and Wada, 2014). CHLOROPLAST UNUSUAL POSITIONING1 (CHUP1; Oikawa et al., 2003) and KINESIN-LIKE PROTEIN FOR ACTIN-BASED CHLOROPLAST MOVEMENT (KAC; Suetsugu et al., 2010b) are key factors for generating and/or maintaining cp-actin filaments. Both proteins are highly conserved in land plants and essential for the movement and attachment of chloroplasts to the plasma membrane in Arabidopsis (Oikawa et al., 2003, 2008; Suetsugu et al., 2010b), A. capillus-veneris (Suetsugu et al., 2012), and P. patens (Suetsugu et al., 2012; Usami et al., 2012). CHUP1 is localized on the chloroplast outer membrane and binds to globular and filamentous actins and profilin in vitro (Oikawa et al., 2003, 2008; Schmidt von Braun and Schleiff, 2008). Although KAC is a kinesin-like protein, it lacks microtubule-dependent motor activity but has filamentous actin binding activity (Suetsugu et al., 2010b). An actin-bundling protein THRUMIN1 (THRUM1) is required for efficient chloroplast photorelocation movement (Whippo et al., 2011) and interacts with cp-actin filaments (Kong et al., 2013a). chup1 and kac mutant plants were shown to lack detectable cp-actin filaments (Kadota et al., 2009; Suetsugu et al., 2010b; Ichikawa et al., 2011; Kong et al., 2013a). Similarly, cp-actin filaments were rarely detected in thrum1 mutant plants (Kong et al., 2013a), indicating that THRUM1 also plays an important role in maintaining cp-actin filaments.Other proteins J-DOMAIN PROTEIN REQUIRED FOR CHLOROPLAST ACCUMULATION RESPONSE1 (JAC1; Suetsugu et al., 2005), WEAK CHLOROPLAST MOVEMENT UNDER BLUE LIGHT1 (WEB1; Kodama et al., 2010), and PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED2 (PMI2; Luesse et al., 2006; Kodama et al., 2010) are involved in the light regulation of cp-actin filaments and chloroplast photorelocation movement. JAC1 is an auxilin-like J-domain protein that mediates the chloroplast accumulation response through its J-domain function (Suetsugu et al., 2005; Takano et al., 2010). WEB1 and PMI2 are coiled-coil proteins that interact with each other (Kodama et al., 2010). Although web1 and pmi2 were partially defective in the avoidance response, the jac1 mutation completely suppressed the phenotype of web1 and pmi2, suggesting that the WEB1/PMI2 complex suppresses JAC1 function (i.e. the accumulation response) under strong light conditions (Kodama et al., 2010). Both web1 and pmi2 showed impaired disappearance of cp-actin filaments in response to strong blue light (Kodama et al., 2010). However, the exact molecular functions of these proteins are unknown.In this study, we characterized mutant plants deficient in the PMI1 gene and two homologous genes PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED1-RELATED1 (PMIR1) and PMIR2. PMI1 was identified through molecular genetic analyses of pmi1 mutants that showed severe defects in chloroplast accumulation and avoidance responses (DeBlasio et al., 2005). PMI1 is a plant-specific C2-domain protein (DeBlasio et al., 2005; Zhang and Aravind, 2010), but its roles and those of PMIRs in cp-actin-mediated chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements remained unclear. Thus, we analyzed chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements in the single, double, and triple mutants of pmi1, pmir1, and pmir2.     

A MOVING MAT: PHOTOTAXIS IN THE FILAMENTOUS GREEN ALGAE SPIROGYRA (CHLOROPHYTA,ZYGNEMATACEAE)1

A blue light– (peak at 470 nm) induced photomovement was observed in the filamentous eukaryotic algae, Spirogyra spp. When Spirogyra filaments were scattered in a water chamber under a unilateral light source, they rapidly aligned toward the light source in 1 h and bound with neighboring filaments to form thicker parallel bundles of filaments. The filaments in the anterior of the bundles curved toward the light first and then those in the posterior began to roll up toward the light, forming an open‐hoop shape. The bundle of filaments then moved toward the light source by repeated rolling and stretching of filaments. When the moving bundle met other filaments, they joined and formed a bigger mat. The coordination of filaments was essential for the photomovement. The average speed of movement ranged between 7.8 and 13.2 μm·s^?1. The movement was induced in irradiance level from 1 to 50 μmol photons·m^?2·s^?1. The filaments of Spirogyra showed random bending and stretching movement under red or far‐red light, but the bundles did not move toward the light source. There was no distinct diurnal rhythm in the photomovement of Spirogyra spp.