An update on the pharmacoeconomics of antifungal pharmacotherapy

The incidence and severity of invasive fungal infections are on the rise and they pose a risk of significant morbidity and mortality. The cost burden of fungal infections in the United States is high. There are many newer, less toxic antifungal agents to manage these challenging infections; however, these agents also carry a high cost of their own. When considering an antifungal agent for a specific patient, it is important to consider safety, efficacy, and cost, thus making it essential to continually evaluate the antifungal pharmacoeconomic literature to assist in the therapeutic decision-making process for patients with invasive fungal infections. Unfortunately, there is a lack of pharmacoeconomic studies addressing the costs associated with the treatment and prevention of fungal infections. Future large-scale clinical studies should include pharmacoeconomic analyses and end points that encompass all costs associated with antifungal drug use, not solely drug acquisition costs.     

Antifungal Distribution Into Cerebrospinal Fluid,Vitreous Humor,Bone, and Other Difficult Sites

The incidence of invasive fungal infections continues to increase, especially in patients with immune dysfunction. Fungal infections are often difficult to treat, requiring therapy for weeks or months to eradicate infection. Although fungal infections of the central nervous system, eye, and bones occur less frequently than infections at other sites, it is necessary to assess the utility of the currently available antifungal agents in treating these infections. Unfortunately, information regarding drug distribution to these sites is often scarce and limited to a few animal studies or case reports. This review summarizes information about commonly used antifungal agents and their penetration into the central nervous system, eye, and bone.     

Delivery of Antifungal Agents from Bone Cement

Fungal osteoarticular infections, including prosthetic joint infections and osteomyelitis, are rare yet present a therapeutic challenge with no guidelines to direct optimal treatment. When these infections occur, the majority are due to Candida species. In addition to systemic therapy, adjunctive antifungal-loaded bone cement has been utilized to successfully treat these infections. Amphotericin B is used most commonly, but cases utilizing voriconazole, fluconazole, and itraconazole have been reported as well. In vitro data suggest better elution of voriconazole from bone cement while there is minimal elution of amphotericin B. Unfortunately, a lack of consistency in the methods of both in vitro studies and case reports makes it difficult to determine if the addition of an antifungal agent in bone cement improves outcomes in fungal osteoarticular infections. This article provides an overview of bone cement as a delivery system for antifungal agents in vitro and in clinical reports.     

AmBisome,tres retos: infección por Candida auris,infección del sistema nervioso central e infección asociada a biopelículas

The treatment of invasive fungal infections remains a challenge, both for the diagnosis and for the need of providing the appropriate antifungal therapy. Candida auris is a pathogenic yeast that is responsible for hospital outbreaks, especially in intensive care units; it is characterized by a high resistance to the antifungal agents and can become multidrug-resistant. At present, the recommended antifungal agents for the invasive infections with this pathogen are echinocandins, always after carrying out an antifungal susceptibility testing. In case of no clinical response or persistent candidemia, the addition of liposomal amphotericin B or isavuconazole may be considered. Both fungal infection of the central nervous system and that associated with biomedical devices remain rare entities affecting mainly immunocompromised patients. However, an increase in their incidence in recent years, along with high morbidity and mortality, has been shown. The treatment of these infections is conditioned by the limited knowledge of the pharmacokinetic properties of antifungals. A better understanding of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of the different antifungals is essential to determine the efficacy of the antifungal agents in the treatment of these infections.     

Antifungals discovery: an insight into new strategies to combat antifungal resistance

Undeniably, new antifungal treatments are necessary against pathogenic fungi. Fungal infections have significantly increased in recent decades, being highlighted as important causes of morbidity and mortality, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Five main antifungal classes are used: (i) azoles, (ii) echinocandins, (iii) polyenes, (iv) allylamines and (v) pyrimidine analogues. Moreover, the treatment of mycoses has several limitations, such as undesirable side effects, narrow activity spectrum, a small number of targets and fungal resistance, which are still of major concern in clinical practice. The discovery of new antifungals is mostly achieved by the screening of natural or synthetic/semisynthetic chemical compounds. The most recent discoveries in drug resistance mechanism and their avoidance were explored in a review, focusing on different antifungal targets, as well as new agents or strategies, such as combination therapy, that could improve antifungal therapy.

Significance and Impact of the Study

The failure to respond to antifungal therapy is complex and is associated with microbiological resistance and increased expression of virulence in fungal pathogens. Thus, this review offers an overview of current challenges in the treatment of fungal infections associated with increased antifungal drug resistance and the formation of biofilms in these opportunistic pathogens. Furthermore, the most recent and potential strategies to combat fungal pathogens are explored here, focusing on new agents as well as innovative approaches, such as combination therapy between antifungal drugs or with natural compounds.     

Invasive fungal infections in critically ill patients: different therapeutic options and a uniform strategy

The high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs associated with the invasive fungal infections, especially in the critical care setting, is of importance since the prophylactic, empiric, and pre-emptive therapy interventions, based on early identification of risk factors, is of common occurrence. In the last years alone there have been important developments in antifungal pharmacotherapy. Evidence-based studies using new antifungal agents are now emerging as important players in the pharmacotherapy of invasive fungal infections in seriously ill and difficult patients. However, data on critically ill patients are more limited and usually recovered from general studies. This study shows the benefits obtained by the new antifungal agents on different clinical situations in critical care units. The increasing number of non-C. albicans species and the high mortality rates in these settings suggest that the application of early de-escalation therapy in critically ill patients with fungal infection should be mandatory. The possibility of using antifungal combination therapy in these types of patients should be considered.     

Combination antifungal therapy: From bench to bedside

Invasive fungal infections are major causes of mortality in immunocompromised patients. Despite improved outcomes with new antifungals, there remains a pressing need to further improve outcomes, especially with invasive aspergillosis and other invasive mold infections. Combination antifungal therapy is an attractive option that offers the prospect for improved efficacy, decreased toxicity, reduced likelihood for the emergence of resistance, and shorter courses of therapy. The current available evidence regarding the role of combination antifungal therapy for invasive fungal infections is discussed in this article, including data from in vitro studies, animal models, and human clinical trials to try to clarify this important issue. Randomized, prospective clinical trials are urgently needed, especially for invasive aspergillosis.     

Antifungal Therapy in Pediatric Patients

Invasive fungal infections still play a major role in morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients, especially in children undergoing therapy for an underlying malignancy and in preterm infants. Relative to the adult population, pediatric age groups display important differences not only in host biology, predisposing conditions, epidemiology, and presentation of fungal infections, but also in the disposition and clearance of antifungal compounds. During the past decade, several new antifungal agents have been developed. Although not all of these agents are yet approved for children, the pediatric development of antifungal agents has moved forward in an exemplary manner, which is essential for the successful management of the individual patient. This article reviews the current data on pharmacokinetics, safety, and dosing of antifungal agents in pediatric patients.     

Recent Studies on Invasive Fungal Diseases in Children and Adolescents: an Update

The improved survival of fragile pediatric hosts such as those afflicted with primary or acquired immune deficiencies, prematurity, and surgical pathology – mainly gastrointestinal and trauma – has resulted in an increased number of children susceptible to invasive fungal infections. These infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Newer, safer antifungal agents allow for preventive and empiric strategies in the management of patients at risk, such as premature infants, patients receiving chemotherapy, and bone marrow or solid-organ transplant recipients. Improved radiological and molecular techniques result in earlier diagnosis of fungal infections, allowing for preemptive therapy in these patients, minimizing exposure to antifungal agents and the risk of emergence of resistant fungal strains. A better understanding of the differences in pharmacokinetics between children and adults will allow for better utilization of existing antifungal agents and improved outcomes.     

Antifungal Dosing in Dialysis and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

Appropriate dosing of antifungal drugs is crucial to achieving favorable outcomes in patients with invasive fungal infections. The use of various types of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in patients with severe acute or chronic renal insufficiency adds another level of complexity to the already challenging use of these drugs. The medical literature provides only a limited number of studies specifically addressing the use of antifungal agents in patients receiving RRT, and there are a number of inherent difficulties in interpreting and applying these studies of drug dosing during RRT to individual patients. This article briefly reviews recent studies examining the dosing of antifungal agents during RRT, and also briefly reviews device-related and drug-related factors that determine the removal of drugs during RRT. Finally, this article summarizes current recommendations for dosing of antifungal agents in patients receiving RRT and highlights areas for future study.     

Immunotherapy for fungal infections

Invasive fungal infections have become a major cause of mortality in immunocompromised individuals. Despite the current availability of number of highly active antifungal agents, overall mortality remains around 40%. Importantly, it is clear that a failure to restore host immunity leads to worse outcomes. These observations provide clear rationale for the development of novel immunotherapies to improve outcomes in immunocompromised individuals with invasive fungal infections. In this article we summarise the key advances that have been made in the field of immunotherapy for fungal infections in recent years, with a particular focus on clinical studies of interferon-γ therapy, adoptive T cell therapy, and gene therapy for chronic granulomatous disorder. In addition a number of pre-clinical approaches are reviewed.     

The fungal cell wall as a target for the development of new antifungal therapies

In the past three decades invasive mycoses have globally emerged as a persistent source of healthcare-associated infections. The cell wall surrounding the fungal cell opposes the turgor pressure that otherwise could produce cell lysis. Thus, the cell wall is essential for maintaining fungal cell shape and integrity. Given that this structure is absent in host mammalian cells, it stands as an important target when developing selective compounds for the treatment of fungal infections. Consequently, treatment with echinocandins, a family of antifungal agents that specifically inhibits the biosynthesis of cell wall (1-3)β-D-glucan, has been established as an alternative and effective antifungal therapy. However, the existence of many pathogenic fungi resistant to single or multiple antifungal families, together with the limited arsenal of available antifungal compounds, critically affects the effectiveness of treatments against these life-threatening infections. Thus, new antifungal therapies are required. Here we review the fungal cell wall and its relevance in biotechnology as a target for the development of new antifungal compounds, disclosing the most promising cell wall inhibitors that are currently in experimental or clinical development for the treatment of some invasive mycoses.     

Systemic antifungals. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics

Invasive fungal infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in critically ill non neutropenic patients. For many years, amphotericin B and flucytosine have been the only available antifungal agents for invasive fungal infections. Fortunately, the antifungal armamentarium has increased during the past two decades with the addition of several new agents. In addition to itraconazole and fluconazole, lipid formulations of amphotericin B, voriconazole, and caspofungin have been recently licensed. These various antifungal agents differ in their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile.     

Modern antifungal therapy for neutropenic fever

Empirical antifungal therapy has been shown to decrease the number of documented fungal infections in the setting of persistent fever during neutropenia. For decades, amphotericin B deoxycholate has been considered the agent of choice for first-line therapy in this setting. New antifungal agents associated with less toxicity, including the lipid formulations of amphotericin, voriconazole, and caspofungin, are now available and are considered to be suitable alternative first-line agents. In order to ensure appropriate therapy, however, the clinician must consider not only the differences between these antifungals but also patient-specific factors before initiating treatment.     

Pediatric pharmacology of antifungal agents

Pediatric age groups display important differences in host biology, predisposing conditions, epidemiology, and presentation of fungal infections relative to the adult population. Over the past decade, major advances have been made in the field of medical mycology. Most importantly, an array of new antifungal agents has entered the clinical arena. Although pediatric approval of several of these agents remains to be established, the pediatric development of antifungal agents is moving forward. Invasive fungal infections will remain important causes for morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised pediatric patients. Although the availability of new therapeutic options is an important advance, antifungal therapy has become increasingly complex, and a thorough understanding of the available antifungal armamentarium is essential for the successful management of individual patients.     

抗白念珠菌感染的疫苗及抗体研究进展

白念珠菌是与人类共生的条件致病真菌,能引起免疫力低下患者皮肤黏膜和全身系统性持续感染.系统性念珠菌病是引起免疫力低下患者死亡的主要原因之一.由于临床缺乏念珠菌病的早期诊疗手段、可用的抗真菌药物种类有限且毒副作用大、耐药菌株越来越普遍、新药研发难度大等因素,抗真菌治疗依然面临着严峻挑战.目前有较多研究者致力于阐明白念珠菌感染的宿主免疫应答机制,并试图研发抗白念珠菌感染的免疫治疗方法,使免疫治疗有望成为预防和治疗真菌感染的有效手段.该文将几种抗白念珠菌感染的疫苗和抗体研究进展作简要概述,旨在为新型抗白念珠菌感染疫苗及抗体的研究提供参考.     

Systemic fungal infections: A pharmacist/researcher perspective

Systemic fungal infections are increasing in prevalence, especially in immunocompromised patients and post-surgical patients. The rise in systemic fungal infections has resulted in increased utilization of antifungal agents which, in turn, has contributed to escalating resistance rates as seen by the increasing number of fungal pathogens added to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Antimicrobial Resistance Threats Report in 2019. Unfortunately, there are few novel antifungal agents coming to market to combat these ever-increasing resistance rates. In this review, we cover the current climate of antifungal agents and explore agents coming through the pipeline and potentially to market. We also discuss the indicated uses for empiric and targeted antifungal therapies as well as the need to include antifungal agents as a part of antimicrobial stewardship programs that focus heavily on antibacterial agents.     

Treatment options in emerging mold infections

Although Zygomycetes, Fusarium spp, and Scedosporium spp are far less frequent causes of invasive fungal disease than Aspergillus and Candida, they are emerging. These types of infections in severely immunocompromised patients have a common feature: a poor clinical response to antifungal therapy. Infection is usually airborne, although local infections in cases of skin trauma are also possible. These fungi are resistant to some common antifungal agents; therefore, surgical debridement of the necrotic tissue, when possible, should be combined with specific systemic antifungal treatment in immunocompromised patients. In the absence of randomized clinical trials, most experience in the treatment of these infections is with amphotericin B. Experience with new antifungal agents is still limited, and recovery from neutropenia remains the main predictor of a favorable outcome.     

Molecular targeted treatments for fungal infections: the role of drug combinations

Invasive mycoses are associated with a high mortality rate, and their incidence is increased in immunologically deficient patients. From a diagnostic and therapeutic perspective, these infections represent a significant challenge to medicine. In addition to new antifungal agents, drug combinations are an important therapeutic resource, which might be exploited clinically, owing to the multiplicity of fungal targets against which currently available agents are active. In this review, we examine the experimental data regarding the combination of conventional antifungal agents with cytokines, antibacterial agents, calcineurin inhibitors and drugs under development characterized by novel mechanisms of action.