Developmental potential of avian trunk neural crest cells in situ

To analyze the developmental potential of individual neural crest cells or their precursors, we have microinjected a vital dye, lysinated rhodamine dextran (LRD), into single cells in the dorsal neural tube. The phenotypes of the descendants that inherited the LRD from the injected cells were evaluated based upon their position, morphology, and neurofilament expression. Individual neural crest cells labeled before or as they emigrated from the neural tube gave rise to both sensory and sympathetic neurons as well as nonneuronal cells, some of which had the morphological characteristics of Schwann cells or pigment cells. In numerous cases, the descendants of a single cell included both neural crest- and neural tube-derived neurons, suggesting that some cells of the peripheral and central nervous systems share a common lineage. Our data demonstrate definitively that both emigrating and premigratory trunk neural crest cells can be multipotent, giving rise not only to cells in multiple neural crest derivatives, but also to both neuronal and nonneuronal elements within a given derivative.     

Origins and Developmental Potential of the Neural Crest

Neural crest cells are a migratory population that forms most of the peripheral nervous system, facial skeleton, and numerous other derivatives. These cells arise from the neural ectoderm and are first recognizable as discrete cells after neural tube closure. In this review, I summarize the results of studies from our laboratory on neural crest cell lineage and origin. Our recent experiments demonstrate that interactions between the presumptive neural plate and the nonneural ectoderm are likely to be instrumental in the induction of the avian neural crest. Juxtaposition of these tissues at early stages results in the formation of neural crest cells at the interface. However, neural crest cells do not appear to be segregated from other neuroepithelial cells; cell lineage studies have demonstrated that individual precursor cells within the neural tube can give rise to both neural crest and neural tube derivatives as diverse as sensory, commissural, and motor neurons. This suggests that individual neuroectodermal cells are multipotent, such that a precursor within the neural tube has the ability to form both neural tube (central nervous system) and neural crest (peripheral nervous system and other) derivatives. Further support for flexibility in the developmental program of neuroepithelial cells comes from experiments in which the cranial neural folds are ablated; this results in regulation by the remaining ventral neural tube cells to form neural crest cells after the endogenous neural crest is removed. At later stage of development, this regulative capacity is lost. Following their emigration from the neural tube, neural crest cells become progressively restricted to defined embryonic states. Taken together, these experiments demonstrate that: (1) the neural crest is an induced population that arises by interactions within the ectoderm; (2) initially, progenitor cells are multipotent, having the potential to form multiple neural crest and neural tube derivatives; and (3) with time, the precursors become progressively restricted to form neural crest derivatives and eventually to individual phenotypes.     

Analysis of neural crest cell lineage and migration.

In this review, we describe the results of recent experiments designed to investigate various aspects of neural crest cell lineage and migration. We have analyzed the lineage of individual premigratory neural crest cells by injecting a fluorescent lineage tracer dye, lysinated fluorescein dextran, into cells within the dorsal neural tube. Individual clones contained cells that were located in very diverse sites consistent with their being sensory neurons, prepigment cells, Schwann cells, adrenergic cells, and neural tube cells. These results suggest that some neural crest cells in the trunk and cranial regions are multipotent prior to their emigration from the neural tube. The environment through which neural crest cells move influences both the pattern and direction of their migration. We have shown that the sclerotomal portion of the somites are responsible for the rostrocaudal pattern of trunk neural crest cell movement, whereas the neural tube appears to govern the dorsoventral position of neural crest-derived ganglia. In addition, the notochord inhibits the movement of neural crest cells. In order to understand necessary cell-matrix interactions in neural crest migration, we have performed perturbation experiments, in which antibodies directed against cell surface or extracellular matrix molecules were introduced along neural crest pathways. We find that integrins, fibronectin, laminin, and tenascin all play some role in cranial neural crest emigration. Thus, multiple factors may be involved in controlling neural crest cell migration, and different factors may be important for migration in different regions of the embryo.     

Emergence and migration of trunk neural crest cells in a snake,the California Kingsnake (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Lampropeltis getula californiae</Emphasis>)

Background  

The neural crest is a group of multipotent cells that emerges after an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition from the dorsal neural tube early during development. These cells then migrate throughout the embryo, giving rise to a wide variety derivatives including the peripheral nervous system, craniofacial skeleton, pigment cells, and endocrine organs. While much is known about neural crest cells in mammals, birds, amphibians and fish, relatively little is known about their development in non-avian reptiles like snakes and lizards.     

Neural crest contributions to the lamprey head

The neural crest is a vertebrate-specific cell population that contributes to the facial skeleton and other derivatives. We have performed focal DiI injection into the cranial neural tube of the developing lamprey in order to follow the migratory pathways of discrete groups of cells from origin to destination and to compare neural crest migratory pathways in a basal vertebrate to those of gnathostomes. The results show that the general pathways of cranial neural crest migration are conserved throughout the vertebrates, with cells migrating in streams analogous to the mandibular and hyoid streams. Caudal branchial neural crest cells migrate ventrally as a sheet of cells from the hindbrain and super-pharyngeal region of the neural tube and form a cylinder surrounding a core of mesoderm in each pharyngeal arch, similar to that seen in zebrafish and axolotl. In addition to these similarities, we also uncovered important differences. Migration into the presumptive caudal branchial arches of the lamprey involves both rostral and caudal movements of neural crest cells that have not been described in gnathostomes, suggesting that barriers that constrain rostrocaudal movement of cranial neural crest cells may have arisen after the agnathan/gnathostome split. Accordingly, neural crest cells from a single axial level contributed to multiple arches and there was extensive mixing between populations. There was no apparent filling of neural crest derivatives in a ventral-to-dorsal order, as has been observed in higher vertebrates, nor did we find evidence of a neural crest contribution to cranial sensory ganglia. These results suggest that migratory constraints and additional neural crest derivatives arose later in gnathostome evolution.     

The Delayed Entry of Thoracic Neural Crest Cells into the Dorsolateral Path Is a Consequence of the Late Emigration of Melanogenic Neural Crest Cells from the Neural Tube

Neural crest cells migrate along two pathways in the trunk: the ventral path, between the neural tube and somite, and the dorsolateral path, between the somite and overlying ectoderm. In avian embryos, ventral migration precedes dorsolateral migration by nearly 24 h, and the onset of dorsolateral migration coincides with the cessation of ventral migration. Neural crest cells in the ventral path differentiate predominantly as neurons and glial cells of the peripheral nervous system, whereas those in the dorsolateral path give rise to the melanocytes of the skin. Thus, early- and late-migrating neural crest cells exhibit unique morphogenetic behaviors and give rise to different subsets of neural crest derivatives. Here we present evidence that these differences reflect the appearance of specified melanocyte precursors, or melanoblasts, from late- but not early-migrating neural crest cells. We demonstrate that serum from Smyth line (SL) chickens specifically immunolabels melanocyte precursors, or melanoblasts. Using SL serum as a marker, we first detect melanoblasts immediately dorsal and lateral to the neural tube beginning at stage 18, which is prior to the onset of dorsolateral migration. At later stages every neural crest cell in the dorsolateral path is SL-positive, demonstrating that only melanoblasts migrate dorsolaterally. Thus, melanoblast specification precedes dorsolateral migration, and only melanoblasts migrate dorsolaterally at the thoracic level. Together with previous work (Erickson, C. A., and Goins, T. L.,Development121, 915–924, 1995), these data argue that specification as a melanoblast is a prerequisite for dorsolateral migration. This conclusion suggested that the delay in dorsolateral migration (relative to ventral migration) may reflect a delay in the emigration of melanogenic neural crest cells from the neural tube. Several experiments support this hypothesis. There are no melanoblasts in the ventral path, as revealed by the absence of SL-positive cells in the ventral path, and neural crest cells isolated from the ventral path do not give rise to melanocytes when explanted in culture, suggesting that early, ventrally migrating neural crest cells are limited in their ability to differentiate as melanocytes. Similarly, neural crest cells that emigrate from the neural tubein vitroduring the first 6 h fail to give rise to any melanocytes or SL-positive melanoblasts, whereas neural crest cells that emigrate at progressively later times show a dramatic increase in melanogenesis under identical culture conditions. Thus, the timing of dorsolateral migration at the thoracic level is ultimately controlled by the late emigration of melanogenic neural crest cells from the neural tube.     

Genes, lineages and the neural crest: a speculative review

Sensory and sympathetic neurons are generated from the trunk neural crest. The prevailing view has been that these two classes of neurons are derived from a common neural crest-derived progenitor that chooses between neuronal fates only after migrating to sites of peripheral ganglion formation. Here I reconsider this view in the light of new molecular and genetic data on the differentiation of sensory and autonomic neurons. These data raise several paradoxes when taken in the context of classical studies of the timing and spatial patterning of sensory and autonomic ganglion formation. These paradoxes can be most easily resolved by assuming that the restriction of neural crest cells to either sensory or autonomic lineages occurs at a very early stage, either before and/or shortly after they exit the neural tube.     

The foot formation stimulating peptide pedibin is also involved in patterning of the head in hydra

Avian neural crest cells migrate on precise pathways to their target areas where they form a wide variety of cellular derivatives, including neurons, glia, pigment cells and skeletal components. In one portion of their pathway, trunk neural crest cells navigate in the somitic mesoderm in a segmental fashion, invading the rostral, while avoiding the caudal, half-sclerotome. This pattern of cell migration, imposed by the somitic mesoderm, contributes to the metameric organization of the peripheral nervous system, including the sensory and sympathetic ganglia. At hindbrain levels, neural crest cells also travel from the neural tube in a segmental manner via three migratory streams of cells that lie adjacent to even-numbered rhombomeres. In this case, the adjacent mesoderm does not possess an obvious segmental organization, compared to the somitic mesoderm at trunk levels. Thus, the mechanisms by which the embryo controls segmentally-organized cell migrations have been a fascinating topic over the past several years. Here, I discuss findings from classical and recent studies that have delineated several of the tissue, cellular and molecular elements that contribute to the segmental organization of neural crest migration, primarily in the avian embryo. One common theme is that neural crest cells are prohibited from entering particular territories in the embryo due to the expression of inhibitory factors. However, permissive, migration-promoting factors may also play a key role in coordinating neural crest migration.     

Neural crest cell migratory pathways in the trunk of the chick embryo

Neural crest cells migrate during embryogenesis to give rise to segmented structures of the vertebrate peripheral nervous system: namely, the dorsal root ganglia and the sympathetic chain. However, neural crest cell arise from the dorsal neural tube where they are apparently unsegmented. It is generally agreed that the somites impose segmentation on migrating crest cells, but there is a disagreement about two basic questions: exactly pathways do neural crest cells use to move through or around somites, and do neural crest cells actively migrate or are they passively dispersed by the movement of somite cells? The answers to both questions are critically important to any further understanding of the mechanisms underlying the precise distribution of the neural crest cells that develop into ganglia. We have done an exhaustive study of the locations of neural crest cells in chick embryos during early stages of their movement, using antibodies to neural crest cells (HNK-1), to neural filament-associated protein in growing nerve processes (E/C8), and to the extracellular matrix molecule laminin. Our results show that Some neural crest cells invade the extracellular space between adjacent somites, but the apparent majority move into the somites themselves along the border between the dermatome/myotome (DM) and the sclerotome. Neural crest cells remain closely associated with the anterior half of the DM of developing somites as they travel, suggesting that the basal lamina of the DM may be used as a migratory substratum. Supporting this idea is our observation that the development of the DM basal lamina coincides in time and location with the onset of crest migration through the somite. The leading front of neural crest cells advance through the somite while the length of the DM pathway remains constant, suggesting active locomotion, at least in this early phase of development. Neural crest cells leave the DM at a later stage of development to associate with the dorsal aorta, where sympathetic ganglia form, and to associate with newly emerging fibers of the ventral root nerve, where they presumably give rise to neuronal supportive cells. Thus we propose that the establishment of the segmental pattern of the peripheral ganglia and nerves depends on the timely development of appropriate substrata to guide and distribute migrating neural crest cells during the early stages of embryogenesis.     

In the beginning: Generating neural crest cell diversity

Neural crest cells (NCCs) are migratory cells that delaminate from the neural tube early in development and then disseminate throughout the embryo to give rise to a wide variety of cell types that are key to the vertebrate body plan. During their journey from the neural tube to their peripheral targets, NCCs progressively differentiate, raising the question of when the fate of an individual NCC is sealed. One hypothesis suggests that the fate of a NCC is specified by target-derived signals emanating from the environment they migrate through, while another hypothesis proposes that NCCs are already specified to differentiate along select lineages at the time they are born in the neural tube, with environmental signals helping them to realize their prespecified fate potential. Alternatively, both mechanisms may cooperate to drive NCC diversity. This review highlights recent advances in our understanding of prespecification during trunk NCC development.Key words: neural crest cell, multipotent, prespecification, neuropilin, semaphorin, migration, cell fate     

Trunk neural crest has skeletogenic potential

During early vertebrate development, neural crest cells emerge from the dorsal neural tube, migrate into the periphery, and form a wide range of derivatives. There is, however, a significant difference between the cranial and trunk neural crest with respect to the diversity of cell types that each normally produces. Thus, while crest cells from all axial levels form neurons, glia, and melanocytes, the cranial crest additionally generates skeletal derivatives such as bone and cartilage; trunk crest cells are generally thought to lack skeletogenic potential. Here, we show, however, that if avian trunk neural crest cells are cultured in appropriate media, they form both bone and cartilage cells, and if placed into the developing head, they contribute to cranial skeletal components. Thus, the neural crest from all axial levels can generate the full repertoire of crest derivatives. The skeletogenic potential of the trunk neural crest is significant, as it was likely realized in early vertebrates, which had extensive postcranial exoskeletal coverings.     

Distribution and migration pathways of HNK-1-immunoreactive neural crest cells in teleost fish embryos.

Whole mounts and cross-sections of embryos from three species of teleost fish were immunostained with the HNK-1 monoclonal antibody, which recognizes an epitope on migrating neural crest cells. A similar distribution and migration was found in all three species. The crest cells in the head express the HNK-1 epitope after they have segregated from the neural keel. The truncal neural crest cells begin to express the epitope while they still reside in the dorsal region of the neural keel; this has not been observed in other vertebrates. The cephalic and anterior truncal neural crest cells migrate under the ectoderm; the cephalic cells then enter into the gill arches and the anterior truncal cells into the mesentery of the digestive tract where they cease migration. These cephalic and anterior trunk pathways are similar to those described in Xenopus and chick. The neural crest cells of the trunk, after segregation, accumulate in the dorsal wedges between the somites, however, unlike in chick and rat, they do not migrate in the anterior halves of the somites but predominantly between the neural tube and the somites, the major pathway observed in carp and amphibians; some cells migrate over the somites. The HNK-1 staining of whole-mount embryos revealed a structure resembling the Rohon-Beard and extramedullary cells, the primary sensory system in amphibians. Such a system has not been described in fish.     

Experimental analysis of the migration and differentiation of neuroblasts of the autonomic nervous system and of neurectodermal mesenchymal derivatives, using a biological cell marking technique

By isotopic and isochronic transplantations of fragments of quail neural tube into chick, it has been previously shown that enteric ganglion cells arise from the “vagal” (somites 1–7) and the “lumbo-sacral” (behind somite 28) levels of the neural crest, while the trunk region (somites 8–28) gives rise to orthosympathetic ganglion chain and adrenomedullary cells. The latter originate precisely from the neural crest corresponding to somites 18–24 (i.e., “adrenomedullary” level of the crest). Heterotopic transplantations of fragments of quail neural tube into chick have been carried out in the present work. When the “adrenomedullary” level of the quail neural tube is grafted into the “vagal” region of a chick, the crest cells colonize the gut and differentiate into enteric ganglia of Auerbach's and Meissner's plexi. If quail cephalic neural crest is transplanted in the “adrenomedullary” level of a chick, quail cells migrate into the suprarenal glands and differentiate into adrenomedullary cells. Mesectodermal cells migrate laterally, and differentiate into cartilage, dermis and connective tissues. Thus it appears that preferential pathways located at precise levels of the embryo lead crest cells to their definitive sites. On the other hand the differentiation of the autonomic neuroblasts is controlled by the environment in which crest cells are localized at the end of their migration. On the contrary, mesenchymal derivatives of the cephalic neural crest appear to be early determined since they differentiate according to their presumptive fate when transplanted into the trunk.     

A novel antigen is shared by retinal pigment epithelium and pigmented neural crest

 Pigment cells in vertebrate embryos are formed in both the central and peripheral nervous system. The neural crest, a largely pluripotent population of precursor cells derived from the embryonic neural tube, gives rise to pigment cells which migrate widely in head and trunk.The retinal pigment epithelium is derived from the optic cup, which arises from ectoderm of the neural tube. We have generated an antibody, ips6, which stains an antigen common to pigment cells of retinal pigment epithelium and neural crest. Ips6 stains retinal pigment epithelium and choroid as well as a subset of crest cells that migrate in pathways typical of melanoblasts. Immunoreactivity is seen first in the eye and later in a subset of migrating crest cells. Crest cells in the amphibian embryo migrate along specific, stereotyped routes; ips6 immunoreactive cells are found in some but not all of these pathways. In older wild-type embryos, cells expressing ips6 appear coincident with pigment-containing cells in the flank, head, eye and embryonic gut. In older animals, staining in the eye extends to the intraretinal segment of optic nerve and interstices between photoreceptors and cells at the retinal periphery. We suggest that the ips6 antibody defines an antigen common to pigment cells of central and peripheral origin. Received: 22 January 1996/Accepted: 15 July 1996     

Graded potential of neural crest to form cornea, sensory neurons and cartilage along the rostrocaudal axis

Neural crest cells arising from different rostrocaudal axial levels form different sets of derivatives as diverse as ganglia, cartilage and cornea. These variations may be due to intrinsic properties of the cell populations, different environmental factors encountered during migration or some combination thereof. We test the relative roles of intrinsic versus extrinsic factors by challenging the developmental potential of cardiac and trunk neural crest cells via transplantation into an ectopic midbrain environment. We then assess long-term survival and differentiation into diverse derivatives, including cornea, trigeminal ganglion and branchial arch cartilage. Despite their ability to migrate to the periocular region, neither cardiac nor trunk neural crest contribute appropriately to the cornea, with cardiac crest cells often forming ectopic masses on the corneal surface. Similarly, the potential of trunk and cardiac neural crest to form somatosensory neurons in the trigeminal ganglion was significantly reduced compared with control midbrain grafts. Cardiac neural crest exhibited a reduced capacity to form cartilage, contributing only nominally to Meckle's cartilage, whereas trunk neural crest formed no cartilage after transplantation, even when grafted directly into the first branchial arch. These results suggest that neural crest cells along the rostrocaudal axis display a graded loss in developmental potential to form somatosensory neurons and cartilage even after transplantation to a permissive environment. Hox gene expression was transiently maintained in the cardiac neural tube and neural crest at 12 hours post-transplantation to the midbrain, but was subsequently downregulated. This suggests that long-term differences in Hox gene expression cannot account for rostrocaudal differences in developmental potential of neural crest populations in this case.     

Delta signaling mediates segregation of neural crest and spinal sensory neurons from zebrafish lateral neural plate

We examined the role of Delta signaling in specification of two derivatives in zebrafish neural plate: Rohon-Beard spinal sensory neurons and neural crest. deltaA-expressing Rohon-Beard neurons are intermingled with premigratory neural crest cells in the trunk lateral neural plate. Embryos homozygous for a point mutation in deltaA, or with experimentally reduced delta signalling, have supernumerary Rohon-Beard neurons, reduced trunk-level expression of neural crest markers and lack trunk neural crest derivatives. Fin mesenchyme, a putative trunk neural crest derivative, is present in deltaA mutants, suggesting it segregates from other neural crest derivatives as early as the neural plate stage. Cranial neural crest derivatives are also present in deltaA mutants, revealing a genetic difference in regulation of trunk and cranial neural crest development.     

Molecular regulation of neural crest development

The neural crest is a transient embryonic structure that gives rise to a multitude of different cell types in the vertebrate. As such, it is an iideal model to study the processes of vertebrate differentiation and development. This review focuses on two major questionsrelated to neural crest development. The first question concerns the degree and time of commitment of the neural crest cellsto differntt cell lineages and the emerging role of the homebox containing genes in regulating this process. Evidence from the cephalic crest suggests that the commitment process does start before the neural crest cells migrate away from the neural tube and gene ablation experiments suggest that different homeobox genes are required for the development of neural and mesenchymal tissue derivatives. However, clonal analysis of neural crest cell before migration suggests that many of the cells remain multi-potential indicating that the final determinative steps occur progressively during migration and in association with environmental influences. The second question concerns the nature of the environmental factors that determine the differentiation of neural crest cells into discrete lineages. Evidence is provided, mainly from in vitro experiments, that purified growth factors selectively promote the differentiation of neural crest cells down either sympathetic, adrenal, sensory, or melanocytic cell lineages.