Possible inducible nature of radioresistant DNA synthesis stimulated by 5-fluorodeoxyuridine

A study was made of the effect of cycloheximide on the radioresistant DNA synthesis stimulated by preincubation of cells with 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FdUrd). It was shown that after the cycloheximide treatment the radioresistant DNA synthesis was absent while in FdUrd-treated cells it did occur. It is assumed that the FdUrd-stimulated radioresistant DNA synthesis is of an inducible nature.     

Protein synthesis inhibitors, like growth factors, may render resting 3T3 cells competent for DNA synthesis: a radioautographic and cell fusion study

Serum-deprived (0.1-0.2%) resting NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblasts pre-incubated with cycloheximide (7.5 micrograms/ml), or puromycin (10 micrograms/ml), were fused with stimulated cells taken 10 h after changing the medium to one containing 10% serum, and DNA synthesis was investigated in the nuclei of monokaryons, homodikaryons and heterodikaryons using radioautography with the double-labelling technique. Pre-incubation of resting cells with inhibitors of protein synthesis for 1-4 h abolished their ability to suppress DNA synthesis in stimulated nuclei in heterokaryons. Three hours after the removal of cycloheximide from the medium, the resting cells acquired once again the inhibitory capacity for entry of stimulated nuclei into the S period. This inhibitory influence disappeared also in the case of post-fusion cycloheximide application as well as following an 8-12 h pre-treatment of resting cells with actinomycin D (1 microgram/ml) prior to fusion. Pre-incubation of resting cells for 12 h with PDGF (1 u/ml-1) followed by an 8-48 h incubation in serum-free medium stimulated the onset of DNA synthesis. A brief exposure (45 min) of resting cells to cycloheximide (7.5 micrograms/ml), or puromycin (7.5 micrograms/ml), exerted a similar effect, inducing by itself the entry of cells into the S period. The results support the assumption that acquirement, by resting cells, of competence for DNA replication includes as a necessary step the down-regulation of intracellular growth inhibitors whose formation depends on protein synthesis.     

Transient inhibition of DNA synthesis by 5-fluorodeoxyuridine leads to overexpression of dihydrofolate reductase with increased frequency of methotrexate resistance

Transient but incomplete suppression of DNA synthesis by a single exposure of an asynchronous population of cells to 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FdUrd) increases the frequency of appearance of methotrexate (MTX)-resistant colonies. This increase was greater than 10-fold following a 6-h incubation of cells with 3 microM FdUrd prior to selection in MTX, an interval one-half the normal L1210 cell cycle time. During this period of exposure to FdUrd, DNA synthesis decreased to 25% of control rates and cells accumulated at the G1/S interface. The 6-h incubation with FdUrd resulted in greater than a 2.5-fold increase in the dihydrofolate reductase protein level in the treated cell population, which was accounted for, at least in part, by increased de novo synthesis of the enzyme as assessed by [35S]methionine labeling. This increase in dihydrofolate reductase was associated with a decrease in growth inhibition by MTX. A brief reversal (2 h) of FdUrd-induced DNA synthesis inhibition by the addition of thymidine eliminated the amplification of dihydrofolate reductase and the enhanced emergence of MTX-resistant clones. Beyond this, an analysis of clones that survive MTX selection indicates that the dihydrofolate reductase gene copy in cells spontaneously resistant to 50 nM MTX and those which resulted after the additional pretreatment with FdUrd for 6 h are comparable with a 2-4-fold amplification of enzyme in most clones. These studies demonstrate that FdUrd enhancement of dihydrofolate reductase expression can have a profound effect upon the incidence and expression of MTX resistance and that dihydrofolate reductase gene amplification may be another basis for antagonism between these agents.     

THE EFFECT OF HYDROXYUREA AND FLUORODEOXYURIDINE ON CELL CYCLE EVENTS IN THE CHLOROCOCCAL ALGA SCENEDESMUS QUADRICAUDA (CHLOROPHYTA)1

The effect of hydroxyurea and 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FdUrd) on the course of growth (RNA and protein synthesis) and reproductive (DNA replication and nuclear and cellular division) processes was studied in synchronous cultures of the chlorococcal alga Scenedesmus quadricauda (Turp.) Bréb. The presence of hydroxyurea (5 mg·L^?1)from the beginning of the cell cycle prevented growth and further development of the cells because of complete inhibition of RNA synthesis. In cells treated later in the cell cycle at the time when the cells were committed to division, hydroxyurea present in light affected the cells in the same way as a dark treatment without hydroxyurea; i. e. RNA synthesis was immediately inhibited followed after a short time period by cessation of protein synthesis. Reproductive processes including DNA replication to which the commitment was attained, however, were initiated and completed. DNA synthesis continued until the constant minimal ratio of RNA to DNA was reached. FdUrd (25 mg·L^?1) added before initiation of DNA replication in control cultures prevented DNA synthesis in treated cells. Addition of FdUrd at any time during the cell cycle prevented or immediately stopped DNA replication. However, by adding excess thymidine (100 mg·L^?1), FdUrd inhibition of DNA replication could be prevented. FdUrd did not affect synthesis of RNA, protein, or starch for at least one cell cycle. After removal of FdUrd, DNA synthesis was reinitiated with about a 2-h delay. The later in the cell cycle FdUrd was removed, the longer it took for DNA synthesis to resume. At exposures to FdUrd longer than two or three control cell cycles, cells in the population were gradually damaged and did not recover at all.     

An approach to modification of the repair activity in eucaryotic cells by biological factors

This work was devoted to investigation or repair regulation by biological factors: viruses and interferon. DNA damage induced by gamma- and UV-irradiation, ethyleneimine and 4-nitro-quinoline-1-oxide (4-NQO) were studied, by sedimentation of lysed cells through alkaline sucrose gradients, by hydroxylapatite column chromatography and by the chromosomal aberration test. The reproducible vaccinia virus resulted in simulation repair activity of chick embryo cells after treatment with 4-NQO. Interferon, added after gamma- and UV-irradiation, decreased the chromosomal aberration level, stabilized it after ethyleneimine treatment and also stimulated the ability of cells to rejoin DNA breaks induced by 4-NQO. The cause of this phenomenon is discussed.     

Sensitivity of Synchronized Chinese Hamster Cells to Ultraviolet Light

The age response for lethality of Chinese hamster cells to ultraviolet light shows that they are resistant in G(1), sensitive as they move into and through the S phase and resistant again in G(2) and mitosis. Survival curves determined at different times in the cycle reveal that mitotic cells are the most resistant fraction, much more resistant than S cells, and more resistant than either G(1) or G(2) cells. The extent to which the age response is ilfluenced by nucleic acid and protein synthesis was investigated by using inhibitors of these processes. In the presence of inhibitors of DNA or protein synthesis added to G(1) cells before exposure, cell survival neither declines to the minimum survival of S cells nor rises subsequently to the resistance of G(2) cells. If, before exposure, DNA synthesis is arrested in the middle of S, when survival is at a minimum, the subsequent rise in survival during G(2) is not prevented. However when cycloheximide is added before exposure, during the middle of S, this rise is prevented. When actinomycin D, an inhibitor of RNA synthesis is added prior to exposure the age response is affected only slightly. Postirradiation treatment of G(1) and mid-S cells with inhibitors of DNA or protein synthesis maintains survival at a level characteristic of the age of the cells.     

Semi-conservative synthesis of DNA in UV-sensitive mutant cells of Chinese hamster after UV-irradiation

A study was made of the rate of semi-conservative DNA synthesis in asynchronous UV-resistant (clone V79) and UV-sensitive clones (VII and XII) of Chinese hamster cells after UV-irradiation. In all 3 clones studied, UV-irradiation (5-30 J/m2) induced a decrease in the rate of DNA synthesis during the subsequent 1-2 h. In the resistant clone (V79) recovery of DNA synthesis rate started after the first 2 h post-irradiation (5 J/m2) and by the 3rd hour reached its maximum value, which constituted 70% of that observed in control, non-irradiated cells. The UV-sensitive mutant clones VII and XII showed no recovery in the rate of DNA synthesis during 6-7 h post-irradiation. The results obtained show that the survival of cells is correlated with the ability of DNA synthesis to recover after UV-irradiation in 3 clones studied. The observed recovery of UV-inhibited DNA synthesis in mutant clones may be due to certain defects in DNA repair.     

Synthesis of protein and mRNA is necessary for transition of suspension-cultured Catharanthus roseus cells from the G1 to the S phase of the cell cycle

The effects of inhibition of the synthesis of protein, mRNA or rRNA on the progression of the cell cycle have been analyzed in cultures of Catharanthus roseus in which cells were induced to divide in synchrony by the double phosphate starvation method. The partial inhibition of protein synthesis at the G₁ phase by anisoniycio or cycloheximide caused the arrest of cells in the G₁ phase or delayed the entry of cells into the S phase. When protein synthesis was partially inhibited at the S phase, cell division occurred to about the same extent as in the control. When asynchronously dividing cells were treated with cycloheximide, cells accumulated in the G₁ phase, as shown by flow-cytometric analysis. The partial inhibition of mRNA synthesis by α-amanitin at the G₁ phase caused the arrest of cells in the G₁ phase, although partial inhibition of mRNA synthesis at the S phase had little effect on cell division. In the case of inhibition of synthesis of rRNA by actinomycin D at the G₁ phase, initiation of DNA synthesis was observed, but no subsequent DNA synthesis or the division of cells occurred. However, the addition of actinomycin D during the S phase had no effect on cell division. These results suggest that specific protein(s), required for the progression of the cell cycle, are synthesized in the G₁ phase, and that the mRNA(s) that encode these proteins are also synthesized at the G₁ phase.     

Superinduction by cycloheximide of mitogen-induced secreted proteins produced by Balb/c 3T3 cells

We describe here some of the characteristics of the regulation of a group of secretory proteins whose secreted levels rise within 2-4 h of adding fibroblast growth factor (FGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), or serum to quiescent Balb/c 3T3 cells. The levels of these secretory proteins are regulated similarly to the interferons. When cycloheximide is present during the induction period, the amounts of [35S]methionine incorporated into five of these proteins that we have called "superinducible proteins" (SIPs) is increased 2-5-fold. Superinduction of the SIPs is seen also in response to polyribol-polyriboC, the classical inducer of interferons. None of the SIPs, however, are immuno-precipitated by anti-beta-interferon antibody. Induction and superinduction of the SIPs is inhibited by actinomycin D. Superinduction occurs at concentrations of cycloheximide that inhibit protein synthesis by at least 85%. The SIPs are not major intracellular proteins; they are barely detectable in cellular fractions. Their induction is, however, correlated with the ability of the polypeptide growth factor to stimulate DNA synthesis; EGF, FGF, and serum induce the SIPs, whereas insulin does not, and insulin alone weakly stimulates DNA synthesis in these cells. Because FGF, EGF, and serum cause the SIPs to be produced at concentrations of cycloheximide that inhibit 85% of bulk protein and DNA synthesis, it follows that the SIPs are produced directly from the action of the growth factor and not as a consequence of increased growth. Although probably not interferons, in analogy to the lymphokines, the SIPs could be a set of autocrine or paracrine factors that rapidly convey the growth or differentiation signal between cells.     

Butyrate inhibits mouse fibroblasts at a control point in the G1 phase

Butyrate block 3T6 cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle approximately 5--6 h prior to the start of the S phase. Serum factors are required before as well as after the butyrate-sensitive steps in G1 in order to allow cells to start DNA synthesis. 3T6 cells infected with SV40 or with polyoma virus are also blocked at the same stage in G1 in the presence of the fatty acid. However, events before as well as after the butyrate-sensitive step do not require serum in virus-infected cells. The sensitivity of the initiation of cellular DNA synthesis to increasing concentrations of butyrate is the same for serum-stimulated or for virus-infected cells. A similar and parallel effect on DNA synthesis is observed if cells are incubated in the presence of very small amounts of cycloheximide. After release of the cycloheximide-induced G1 arrest about 4--6 h have to pass before cells enter the S phase. Cells stably transformed by SV40 are considerably more resistant to low cycloheximide concentrations and to butyrate. These data are discussed in the light of the hypothesis that both low concentrations of cycloheximide and sodium butyrate block cells at a control point in G1 by interference with the synthesis of one or more rapidly turning over, cell cycle-specific proteins.     

Problems in the estimation of mutation rates and in the detection of induced mutations in man

The contribution of nuclear-directed protein synthesis in the repair of lethal and mitochondrial genetic damage after UV-irradiation of exponential and stiationary phase haploid yeast cells was examined. This was carried out using cycloheximide (CH), a specific inhibitor of nuclear protein synthesis. It appears that nuclear protein synthesis required for the increase in survival seen after the liquid holding of cells at both stages, as well as for the “petite” recovery seen after the liquid holding of exponential phase cells. The characteristic negative liquid holding effect observed for the UV induction of “petites” in stationary phase cells (increase of the frequency of “petites” during storage) remained following all the treatments which inhibited nuclear protein synthesis. However, the application of photoreactivating light following dark holding with cycloheximide indicates that some steps of the repair of both nuclear and mitochondrial damage are performed in the absence of a synthesis of proteins.     

Metabolism of 5-fluorouracil in sensitive and resistant Novikoff hepatoma cells.

N1-S1/FdUrd Novikoff hepatoma cells, which lack thymidine kinase activity, are resistant to 5-fluorouracil (FUra) as well as 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FdUrd), suggesting that the pathway, FUra leads to FdUrd leads to FdUMP, is utilized for the conversion of FUra to FdUMP. However, the inhibition of thymidylate synthetase activity, the presumed target of FdUMP, by 1 X 10(-4) M FUra in intact N1-S1 Novikoff hepatoma cells, which have significant levels of thymidine kinase activity, is completely eliminated by 5 X 10(-4) M hydroxyurea, which is a potent inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase. These results imply that the formation of ribonucleotides and does not involve thymidine kinase. This apparent dichotomy can be explained by the fact that, in addition to the well known lack of thymidine kinase activity, [14C]FUra conversion to ribonucleotides is greatly depressed in the N1-S1/FdUrd cells. Hence, the formation of FdUMP from FUra in Novikoff hepatoma cells apparently proceeds primarily via the intermediate formation of ribonucleotides. The decreased conversion of FUra to ribonucleotides in N1-S1/FdUrd cells decreases not only the ability of the analog to inhibit DNA synthesis, but also its effect on RNA metabolism. FUra, at a concentration of 1 X 10(-5) M, inhibits rRNA maturation in N1-S1 cells, but not in N1-S1/FdUrd cells. Since N1-S1/FdUrd cells are completely resistant to 1 X 10(-5) M FUra, whereas N1-S1 cells are completely inhibited by 1 X 10(-5) M FUra, even in the presence of 1 X 10(-4) M thymidine, the effects of FUra on RNA metabolism appear to contribute significantly to the cytotoxicity of the analog at higher drug concentrations.     

Inducibility of the response of yeast cells to peroxide stress.

Exponential phase cells of the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae when treated with a non-lethal concentration of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2; 0.2mM) for 60 min adapted to become resistant to the lethal effects of a higher dose of H2O2 (2mM). From studies using cycloheximide to inhibit protein synthesis it appears that protein synthesis is required for maximal induction of resistance but that some degree of protection from the lethal effects of peroxide can be acquired in the absence of protein synthesis. Treatment of cells with 50 micrograms cycloheximide ml-1 alone lead to them acquiring some protection from peroxide. Cells subjected to heat shock became more resistant to 2mM-H2O2; however, peroxide pretreatment did not confer thermotolerance. L-[35S]Methionine labelling of cells subjected to 0.2 mM-H2O2 stress showed that synthesis of at least ten polypeptides was induced by peroxide treatment. Some of these were also induced in cells subjected to heat shock (23 to 37 degrees C shift) but the synthesis of at least four polypeptides (45, 39.5, 38 and 24 kDa) was unique to peroxide-stressed cells. Resistance to peroxide was also inducible in an isogenic petite and an isogenic strain with a mutation in the HAP1 gene, indicating that the adaptive response does not require functional mitochondria.     

Effect of hydrophobic compounds on rRNA synthesis in intact cells and isolated nuclei

Papaverine, cycloheximide, 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP) and actinomycin D at low concentration have been shown to suppress selectively rRNA synthesis in Ehrlich ascite carcinoma cells. rRNA synthesis in isolated nuclei is not sensible to wide range of concentration of papaverine (0,005-0,1 mM), cycloheximide (0,5-100 micrograms/ml) and DNP (5-500 microM). Actinomycin D at low concentration does not act on the rRNA synthesis in vitro either. To suppress rRNA synthesis in this system much higher concentration of this agent (10 micrograms/ml) producing inhibition of all classes of rRNA synthesis in intact cells is required. Selective sensitivity of rRNA synthesis in the cells to papaverine, cycloheximide, DNP and low concentration of actinomycin D does not connect with their direct action on the apparatus of rRNA synthesis.     

Cycloheximide effect on DNA degradation and delta-crystallin synthesis in terminally differentiating lens cells

Low concentrations of a protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide, were added throughout the process of in vitro differentiation of 11-day old embryonic chick lens cells. We found with low concentrations of cycloheximide (0.01 to 0.03 microgram/ml, 3 days of culture), that there was an almost complete delay of DNA degradation as observed on alkaline sucrose gradient. Identical concentrations and exposure time had no blocking effect on increased delta-crystallin synthesis as detected by immunoprecipitation and electrophoresis. Higher concentrations of cycloheximide (0.1 to 1 microgram/ml) showed a marked effect on DNA size and a net inhibition on delta-crystallin synthesis. Thus a selective effect of low doses of cycloheximide was observed on terminal differentiation suggesting that there was not a relationship between DNA degradation and delta-crystallin synthesis in these short term experiments. The investigations of minor proteins could be of interest as they may have a crucial role in intact nuclei cataracts.     

Checkpoint signaling, base excision repair, and PARP promote survival of colon cancer cells treated with 5-fluorodeoxyuridine but not 5-fluorouracil

The fluoropyrimidines 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and FdUrd (5-fluorodeoxyuridine; floxuridine) are the backbone of chemotherapy regimens for colon cancer and other tumors. Despite their widespread use, it remains unclear how these agents kill tumor cells. Here, we have analyzed the checkpoint and DNA repair pathways that affect colon tumor responses to 5-FU and FdUrd. These studies demonstrate that both FdUrd and 5-FU activate the ATR and ATM checkpoint signaling pathways, indicating that they cause genotoxic damage. Notably, however, depletion of ATM or ATR does not sensitize colon cancer cells to 5-FU, whereas these checkpoint pathways promote the survival of cells treated with FdUrd, suggesting that FdUrd exerts cytotoxicity by disrupting DNA replication and/or inducing DNA damage, whereas 5-FU does not. We also found that disabling the base excision (BER) repair pathway by depleting XRCC1 or APE1 sensitized colon cancer cells to FdUrd but not 5-FU. Consistent with a role for the BER pathway, we show that small molecule poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2 (PARP) inhibitors, AZD2281 and ABT-888, remarkably sensitized both mismatch repair (MMR)-proficient and -deficient colon cancer cell lines to FdUrd but not to 5-FU. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that the roles of genotoxin-induced checkpoint signaling and DNA repair differ significantly for these agents and also suggest a novel approach to colon cancer therapy in which FdUrd is combined with a small molecule PARP inhibitor.     

DNA fragmentation induced in macrophages by gliotoxin does not require protein synthesis and is preceded by raised inositol triphosphate levels.

We have shown that the immunomodulating agent gliotoxin induces DNA fragmentation in macrophages characteristic of programmed cell death or apoptosis (Waring, P., Eichner, R. D., Mullbacher, A., and Sjaarda, A. (1988) J. Biol. Chem, 263, 18493-18499). In addition, morphological changes and DNA fragmentation characteristic of apoptosis are induced in 48 h concanavalin A-stimulated T blasts by gliotoxin and these changes are inhibited by Zn2+ (Waring, P., Egan, M., Braithwaite, A., Mullbacher, A., and Sjaarda, A. (1990) Int. J. Immunopharmacol., in press). We have studied the effects of actinomycin D and the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide on apoptosis induced by gliotoxin in these cells, and these studies demonstrate no effect on apoptosis induced by gliotoxin. Cycloheximide and actinomycin D alone induce DNA fragmentation in these cells. Gliotoxin itself proved to be a potent inhibitor of protein synthesis. The fragmentation caused by cycloheximide correlated with the extent of protein synthesis inhibition. The toxin ricin also induced DNA fragmentation in T blasts characteristic of apoptosis. These results indicate that protein synthesis is not required for induction of apoptosis in macrophages or T blasts by gliotoxin. Gliotoxin caused elevated levels of inositol triphosphate in treated macrophages which may be related to mobilization of Ca2+ levels during apoptosis.     

Requirement for protein synthesis in the regulation of protein breakdown in cultured hepatoma cells.

The modes of action of insulin and of inhibitors of protein synthesis on the degradation of labeled cellular proteins have been studied in cultured hepatoma (HTC) cells. Protein breakdown is accelerated upon the deprivation of serum (normally present in the culture medium), and this enhancement is inhibited by either insulin or cycloheximide. An exception is a limited class of rapidly turning over cellular proteins, the degradation of which is not influenced by insulin or cycloheximide. Alternative hypotheses to explain the relationship of protein synthesis to the regulation of protein breakdown, viz., control by the levels of precursors of protein synthesis, regulation by the state of the ribosome cycle, or requirement for a product of protein synthesis, have been examined. Protein breakdown was not influenced by amino acid deprivation, and measurements of valyl-tRNA levels in HTC cells subjected to various experimental conditions showed no correlation between the levels of charged tRNAVal and the rates of protein degradation. Three different inhibitors of protein synthesis (puromycin, pactamycin, and cycloheximide) suppressed enhanced protein breakdown in a similar fashion. A direct relationship was found between the respective potencies of these drugs to inhibit protein synthesis and to block enhanced protein breakdown. When cycloheximide and insulin were added following a prior incubation of HTC cells in a serum-free medium, protein breakdown was maximally suppressed within 15-30 min. Actinomycin D inhibited protein breakdown only after a time lag of about 90 min. It is suggested that the regulation of protein breakdown in hepatoma cells requires the continuous formation of a product of protein synthesis, in a manner analogous to the mode of the control of this process in bacteria.