Proton-sensing and lysolipid-sensitive G-protein-coupled receptors: a novel type of multi-functional receptors

OGR1, GPR4, G2A, and TDAG8 share 40% to 50% homology with each other and seem to form a family of GPCRs. They have been described as receptors for lipid molecules such as sphingosylphosphorylcholine, lysophosphatidylcholine, and psychosine. Recent studies, however, have revealed that these receptors also sense extracellular protons or pH through histidine residues of receptors and stimulate a variety of intracellular signaling pathways through several species of hetero-trimeric G-proteins, including G_s, G_i, G_q, and G_12/13. Thus, this family of GPCR seems to recognize both lipid molecules and protons as ligands. Although our knowledge of proton-sensing and lysolipid-sensitive GPCRs is preliminary, the receptor levels and ligand levels especially protons are both sensitively modulated in response to a variety of microenvironmental changes. These results suggest a multiple role of proton-sensing GPCRs in a variety of physiological and pathophysiological states.     

G-protein-coupled receptors and melanoma

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) are the largest family of receptors with over 500 members. Evaluation of GPCR gene expression in primary human tumors identified over-expression of GPCR in several tumor types. Analysis of cancer samples in different disease stages also suggests that some GPCR may be involved in early tumor progression and others may play a critical role in tumor invasion and metastasis. Currently, >50% of drug targets to various human diseases are based on GPCR. In this review, the relationships between several GPCR and melanoma development and/or progression will be discussed. Finally, the possibility of using one or more of these GPCR as therapeutic targets in melanoma will be summarized.     

Bioinformatical analysis of G-protein-coupled receptors

G-protein-coupled receptors play a key role in cellular signaling networks that regulate various physiological processes, such as vision, smell, taste, neurotransmission, secretion, inflammatory, immune responses, cellular metabolism, and cellular growth. These proteins are very important for understanding human physiology and disease. Many efforts in pharmaceutical research have been aimed at understanding their structure and function. Unfortunately, because they are difficult to crystallize and most of them will not dissolve in normal solvents, so far very few G-protein-coupled receptor structures have been determined. In contrast, more than 1000 G-protein-coupled receptor sequences are known, and many more are expected to become known soon. In view of the extremely unbalanced state, it would be very useful to develop a fast sequence-based method to identify their different types. This would no doubt have practical value for both basic research and drug discovery because the function or binding specificity of a G-protein coupled receptor is determined by the particular type it belongs to. To realize this, a statistical analysis has been performed for 566 G-protein-coupled receptors classified into seven different types. The results indicate that the types of G-protein-coupled receptors are predictable to a considerable accurate extent if a good training data set can be established for such a goal.     

Selective modulation of wild type receptor functions by mutants of G-protein-coupled receptors

Members of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family are involved in most aspects of higher eukaryote biology, and mutations in their coding sequence have been linked to several diseases. In the present study, we report that mutant GPCR can affect the functional properties of the co-expressed wild type (WT) receptor. Mutants of the human platelet-activating factor receptor that fail to show any detectable ligand binding (N285I and K298stop) or coupling to a G-protein (D63N, D289A, and Y293A) were co-expressed with the WT receptor in Chinese hamster ovary and COS-7 cells. In this context, N285I and K298stop mutant receptors inhibited 3H-WEB2086 binding and surface expression. Co-transfection with D63N resulted in a constitutively active receptor phenotype. Platelet-activating factor-induced inositol phosphate production in cells transfected with a 1:1 ratio of WT:D63N was higher than with the WT cDNA alone but was abolished with a 1:3 ratio. We confirmed that these findings could be extended to other GPCRs by showing that co-expression of the WT C-C chemokine receptor 2b with a carboxyl-terminal deletion mutant (K311stop), resulted in a decreased affinity and responsiveness to MCP-1. A better understanding of this phenomenon could lead to important tools for the prevention or treatment of certain diseases.     

Oligomerization of G-protein-coupled transmitter receptors

Examples of G-protein-coupled receptors that can be biochemically detected in homo- or heteromeric complexes are emerging at an accelerated rate. Biophysical approaches have confirmed the existence of several such complexes in living cells and there is strong evidence to support the idea that dimerization is important in different aspects of receptor biogenesis and function. While the existence of G-protein-coupled-receptor homodimers raises fundamental questions about the molecular mechanisms involved in transmitter recognition and signal transduction, the formation of heterodimers raises fascinating combinatorial possibilities that could underlie an unexpected level of pharmacological diversity, and contribute to cross-talk regulation between transmission systems. Because G-protein-coupled receptors are major pharmacological targets, the existence of dimers could have important implications for the development and screening of new drugs. Here, we review the evidence supporting the existence of G-protein-coupled-receptor dimerization and discuss its functional importance.     

G-protein-coupled receptors in intestinal chemosensation

Food intake is detected by the chemical senses of taste and smell and subsequently by chemosensory cells?in the gastrointestinal tract that link the composition of ingested foods to feedback circuits controlling gut motility/secretion, appetite, and peripheral nutrient disposal. G-protein-coupled receptors responsive to?a range of nutrients and other food components have been identified, and many are localized to intestinal chemosensory cells, eliciting hormonal and neuronal signaling to the brain and periphery. This review examines the role of G-protein-coupled receptors as signaling molecules in the gut, with a particular focus on pathways relevant to appetite and glucose homeostasis.     

Current developments in G-protein-coupled receptors.

The rate at which receptors have been cloned has recently increased dramatically--existing families have been extended and new families created. The rapid cloning by homology of 'orphan receptors' has also stimulated the development of a new reverse pharmacology.     

Bin classification of G-protein-coupled peptide receptors

Summary With the use of the binmap method, 154 G-protein-coupled peptide receptors are classified. The binmap coordinates are obtained by using the number of residues between the conserved N residue in TM1 and C in the TM4-TM5 loop, between this C and the conserved P in TM6, and between this P and the last residue of the sequence. The binmap suggests that the cloned fMLP receptor in rabbit belongs in fact to the IL8 receptor type.     

Mechanisms of cross-talk between G-protein-coupled receptors

There is increasing evidence to suggest that 'cross-talk' occurs between G-protein-coupled receptors and their intracellular second messenger pathways. Cross-talk between different pathways may occur at the level of receptors, G-proteins, effectors or second messengers and may serve to fine-tune cell signalling. There is a growing body of evidence to suggest that cellular compartmentalization may play a crucial role in regulating these cross-talk interactions. Understanding the mechanisms of cross-talk may therefore be the key to the design and application of future therapeutics and the development of drug specificity.     

Biacore analysis with stabilized G-protein-coupled receptors

Using stabilized forms of β₁ adrenergic and A_2A adenosine G-protein-coupled receptors, we applied Biacore to monitor receptor activity and characterize binding constants of small-molecule antagonists spanning more than 20,000-fold in affinity. We also illustrate an improved method for tethering His-tagged receptors on NTA (carboxymethylated dextran preimmobilized with nitrilotriacetic acid) chips to yield stable, high-capacity, high-activity surfaces as well as a novel approach to regenerate receptor binding sites. Based on our success with this approach, we expect that the combination of stabilized receptors with biosensor technology will become a common method for characterizing members of this receptor family.     

Bin classification of G-protein-coupled peptide receptors

With the use of the binmap method, 154 G-protein-coupled peptide receptors are classified. The binmap coordinates are obtained by using the number of residues between the conserved N residue in TM1 and C in the TM4-TM5 loop, between this C and the conserved P in TM6, and between this P and the last residue of the sequence. The binmap suggests that the cloned fMLP receptor in rabbit belongs in fact to the IL8 receptor type.     

Conformation state-sensitive antibodies to G-protein-coupled receptors

A growing body of evidence indicates that G-protein-coupled receptors undergo complex conformational changes upon agonist activation. It is likely that the extracellular region, including the N terminus, undergoes activation-dependent conformational changes. We examined this by generating antibodies to regions within the N terminus of micro-opioid receptors. We find that antibodies to the midportion of the N-terminal tail exhibit enhanced recognition of activated receptors, whereas those to the distal regions do not. The enhanced recognition is abolished upon treatment with agents that block G-protein coupling or deglycosylate the receptor. This suggests that the N-terminal region of mu receptors undergoes conformational changes following receptor activation that can be selectively detected by these region-specific antibodies. We used these antibodies to characterize micro receptor type-specific ligands and find that the antibodies accurately differentiate ligands with varying efficacies. Next, we examined if these antibodies can be used to investigate the extent and duration of activation of endogenous receptors. We find that peripheral morphine administration leads to a time-dependent increase in antibody binding in the striatum and prefrontal cortex with a peak at about 30 min, indicating that these antibodies can be used to probe the spatio-temporal dynamics of native mu receptors. Finally, we show that this strategy of targeting the N-terminal region to generate receptor conformation-specific antisera can be applied to other G(alpha)(i)-coupled (delta-opioid, CB1 cannabinoid, alpha(2A)-adrenergic) as well as G(alpha)(s)-(beta(2)-adrenergic) and G(alpha)(q)-coupled (AT1 angiotensin) receptors. Taken together, these studies describe antisera as tools that allow, for the first time, studies probing differential conformation states of G-protein-coupled receptors, which could be used to identify molecules of therapeutic interest.     

Conserved activation pathways in G-protein-coupled receptors

GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) are seven-transmembrane helix proteins that transduce exogenous and endogenous signals to modulate the activity of downstream effectors inside the cell. Despite the relevance of these proteins in human physiology and pharmaceutical research, we only recently started to understand the structural basis of their activation mechanism. In the period 2008-2011, nine active-like structures of GPCRs were solved. Among them, we have determined the structure of light-activated rhodopsin with all the features of the active metarhodopsin-II, which represents so far the most native-like model of an active GPCR. This structure, together with the structures of other inactive, intermediate and active states of rhodopsin constitutes a unique structural framework on which to understand the conserved aspects of the activation mechanism of GPCRs. This mechanism can be summarized as follows: retinal isomerization triggers a series of local structural changes in the binding site that are amplified into three intramolecular activation pathways through TM (transmembrane helix) 5/TM3, TM6 and TM7/TM2. Sequence analysis strongly suggests that these pathways are conserved in other GPCRs. Differential activation of these pathways by ligands could be translated into the stabilization of different active states of the receptor with specific signalling properties.     

Modelling G-protein-coupled receptors for drug design

The G-protein coupled receptors form a large and diverse multi-gene superfamily with many important physiological functions. As such, they have become important targets in pharmaceutical research. Molecular modelling and site-directed mutagenesis have played an important role in our increasing understanding of the structural basis of drug action at these receptors. Aspects of this understanding, how these techniques can be used within a drug-design programme, and remaining challenges for the future are reviewed.     

Structure-guided optimization of light-activated chimeric G-protein-coupled receptors

1. Download : Download high-res image (215KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

G-protein-coupled receptors function as oligomers in vivo

Hormones, sensory stimuli, neurotransmitters and chemokines signal by activating G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) [1]. Although GPCRs are thought to function as monomers, they can form SDS-resistant dimers, and coexpression of two non-functional or related GPCRs can result in rescue of activity or modification of function [2-10]. Furthermore, dimerization of peptides corresponding to the third cytoplasmic loops of GPCRs increases their potency as activators of G proteins in vitro [11], and peptide inhibitors of dimerization diminish beta(2)-adrenergic receptor signaling [3]. Nevertheless, it is not known whether GPCRs exist as monomers or oligomers in intact cells and membranes, whether agonist binding regulates monomer-oligomer equilibrium, or whether oligomerization governs GPCR function. Here, we report that the alpha-factor receptor, a GPCR that is the product of the STE2 gene in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is oligomeric in intact cells and membranes. Coexpression of receptors tagged with the cyan or yellow fluorescent proteins (CFP or YFP) resulted in efficient fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) due to stable association rather than collisional interaction. Monomer-oligomer equilibrium was unaffected by binding of agonist, antagonist, or G protein heterotrimers. Oligomerization was further demonstrated by rescuing endocytosis-defective receptors with coexpressed wild-type receptors. Dominant-interfering receptor mutants inhibited signaling by interacting with wild-type receptors rather than by sequestering G protein heterotrimers. We suggest that oligomerization is likely to govern GPCR signaling and regulation.