亚麻脱胶新工艺的初步研究

研究了温水浸渍亚麻脱胶过程中的产果胶酶的微生物数量、种类和果胶酶活力变化规律,分离筛选出了产果胶酶活力较高的厌氧和兼性厌氧菌各l株,研究了这2个菌株的种子培养条件,用正交实验法优化了接入厌氧和兼性厌氧菌的亚麻脱胶工艺.实验结果表明亚麻脱胶周期缩短35%,可改善麻纤维质量.     

亚麻酶法脱胶研究进展

该文综述了亚麻酶法脱胶的研究现状及前景。从酶的组成、酶法亚麻脱胶工艺和酶法脱胶后亚麻纤维结构及组成变化三方面进行了论述。指出了亚麻酶法脱胶的优越性,现存的问题及其研究方向。     

亚麻纤维脱胶菌的筛选及脱胶效果研究

为筛选亚麻纤维脱胶菌株,从麻脱胶废水、废麻堆积物等7个含麻胶质样品中分离得到39株能分解果胶的菌株.采用水解圈法复筛选出8株果胶酶活性较高的菌株,经果胶酶、纤维素酶活性测定和菌体脱胶试验,最终确定8-1是优良的亚麻脱胶菌株,该菌株果胶酶活可达663.17 u/mL,而纤维素酶活仅为9.13 u/mL.菌株8-1经形态观察、Biolog菌种鉴定系统鉴定以及基于16S rDNA序列构建的系统进化树分析为一株芽孢杆菌.     

木聚糖酶生产现状研究

木聚糖酶(xylanase)是一种广为所知的工业用酶制剂,在造纸、食品、饲料工业、亚麻脱胶、燃料生产等工业中有广泛应用。本文详细介绍了木聚糖酶的酶学性质、微生物生产木聚糖酶的诱导物以及生产发展现状等方面。     

亚麻外源基因遗传转化研究进展

亚麻作为重要的经济作物,其遗传转化研究对亚麻新品种的选育工作具有重要意义.分析亚麻遗传转化方法、提高转化效率及转化组织筛选等方面,重点从抗除草剂基因、抗病基因、抗重金属逆性基因、改善亚麻纤维质量基因,以及改善亚麻油质量基因方面综述亚麻遗传转化外源基因的研究和应用进展,并讨论亚麻遗传转化过程中存在的问题和解决策略.     

亚麻微生物脱胶优势菌的选育及其应用

从亚麻种植土壤与沤麻水中分离出96株能分解果胶的菌株。通过初筛和复筛获得4株果胶酶高产菌株。其中,在果胶平板培养基上生长速度快、产果胶酶活力高的12号菌株被确定为优势菌,经鉴定其为枯草芽孢杆菌。最适脱胶条件为：麻水比1：15,pH7．5,温度32～33℃,预培养的优势菌接种量3％。结果表明,采用优势菌的脱胶周期比对照缩短50％左右,而且麻的纤维质量明显得以改善。     

木瓜籽毛油精炼条件筛选及其理化指标分析

以磷脂含量为指标对木瓜〔Chaenomeles sinensis ( Thouin) Koehne〕籽毛油水化脱胶过程中脱胶剂种类、脱胶剂添加量、脱胶时间、加水量和脱胶温度进行单因素实验,并在此基础上对脱胶时间、加水量和脱胶温度进行L9(33)正交实验;以酸价为指标对碱炼脱酸过程中的碱液(NaOH溶液)浓度、碱炼温度和超碱用量进行单因素实验和L9(33)正交实验;并比较了毛油、脱胶油、脱酸油和精炼油的主要理化指标变化。单因素实验和正交实验结果表明：在木瓜籽毛油水化脱胶过程中采用不同的脱胶剂种类(包括柠檬酸、草酸和蒸馏水)、脱胶剂添加量(质量分数0.1%~0.5%)、脱胶时间(10~70 min)、加水量(质量分数1%~6%)和脱胶温度(65℃~85℃),毛油中的磷脂含量均有明显差异;而碱炼脱酸过程中采用不同的碱液浓度(质量分数6%~14%)、碱炼温度(40℃~80℃)和超碱用量(质量分数0.15%~0.40%),毛油酸价也有明显变化。总体上看,木瓜籽毛油水化脱胶的适宜条件为添加质量分数0.2%柠檬酸为脱胶剂、脱胶温度75℃、加水量为质量分数4%、脱胶时间50 min;碱炼脱酸的适宜条件为碱液浓度为质量分数12%、碱炼温度80℃、超碱用量为质量分数0.30%。理化指标的测定结果表明：与毛油相比,脱胶油、脱酸油和精炼油的碘值略升高但差异不明显、过氧化值明显升高、磷脂含量和皂化值均明显下降,而脱酸油和精炼油的酸价也明显下降。研究结果显示：经过脱胶、脱酸、水洗干燥一系列过程后获得的木瓜籽精炼油的理化指标基本符合国家食用植物油卫生标准。     

两株芽孢杆菌在苎麻纤维复合脱胶中的应用

【背景】苎麻纤维细长、强韧、洁白、有光泽,被誉为"天然纤维之王",应用广泛。但其被以半纤维素和果胶为主要成分的胶质所包裹,脱胶是生产精干麻工艺的核心工序。利用单一菌株脱胶,往往因其脱胶酶系不全,存在胶质去除率低的问题,导致后期仍需要大量的碱和漂白剂处理。【目的】丰富苎麻脱胶过程中关键酶系,从而提高苎麻胶质去除率,并降低脱胶后期化学试剂的用量,推进苎麻生物脱胶的工艺应用。【方法】选用2株芽孢杆菌HG-9 (高果胶酶和甘露聚糖酶)和HG-25(高木聚糖酶)建立了复合微生物脱胶技术,并对其进行了优化。【结果】当2株菌接种量均为6%,水料比16:1,初始pH值5.9,在温度37.6°C下脱胶处理14 h时脱胶效果最佳,与菌株HG-9单独脱胶相比,脱胶时间减少2 h,胶质去除率、半纤维素去除率和木质素去除率分别提高9.32%、21.24%和17.93%,次氯酸钠用量减少20%。通过电子显微镜分析其形貌特征发现,混合脱胶获得的纤维表面更加平滑,无明显扭曲和损伤且纤维分散度较高。【结论】通过复合微生物协同作用,丰富脱胶过程中关键酶系,提高了苎麻纤维胶质去除率,缩短了脱胶时间,而且减少了脱胶后期漂白剂的用量,为苎麻生物脱胶工业化应用的进一步发展提供了指导。     

植物亚麻荠素的生物合成

文章介绍植物亚麻荠素合成过程中的中间体、催化酶和相关基因的研究进展.     

亚麻脱胶菌种的选育及脱胶过程的初步研究

从沤麻主生物期的水中分离产果胶酶的菌株经初筛、复筛获得了三株专性厌氧细菌,初步鉴定为费氏芽孢杆菌,对其亚麻脱胶性能进行了初步研究,确定人工加菌沤麻的最适工艺条件为：加菌量2％,加菌时间：沤麻进入主生物期零时,菌株A优于其它菌株．结果表明：采用上述工艺进行沤麻实验,可缩短沤麻时间30％,并可提高麻纤维质量。     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor