Effect of one year rotational set-aside on immediate and ensuing nitrogen leaching loss

This paper reports results from a 3-year field experiment which examined Nitrogen (N) leaching loss from land under various set-aside managements. Four treatments were examined: three ploughed plots which were sown with wheat, ryegrass or maintained fallow; the fourth treatment was unploughed and natural weed growth (volunteers) permitted. The l-year set-aside was followed by two winter wheat test crops. Ceramic suction cups were installed at a depth of 90 cm and used to collect drainage water. N leaching loss was calculated by multiplying drainage volume, calculated from meteorological data, by its inorganic N concentration.Set-aside management significantly affected N leaching loss over the three years. During the set-aside year, the peak nitrate concentration from the unploughed treatment growing volunteer weeds was significantly lower than that from ploughed plots. Of the latter, by the spring, crop (i.e. wheat and ryegrass) assimilation of N significantly reduced N concentration compared to the fallow. The four set-aside treatments had a carry-over effect to the following year (first wheat test crop) resulting in significant differences in N losses. Leaching following the ryegrass treatment was very small and we believe that the grass residues minimised rates of net-N mineralization.The influence of set-aside management continued to the second wheat test crop where N loss was greater under the all wheat rotation because take-all had reduced yield and therefore crop N uptake.     

Significance of nitrate leaching and long term N immobilization after deepening the plough layers for the N regime of arable soils in N.W. Germany

Field studies were conducted to assess the turnover and the leaching of nitrogen in arable soils of Lower Saxony (NW Germany). The mean surplus N (difference between N inputs by fertilization and N export by the yield; 146 field plots) from 1985–1988 amounted to 38 kg ha^-1 yr^-1 in fine textured (clay, loam, silt) and to 98 kg ha^-1 yr^-1 in coarse (sandy) soils. Leaching of nitrate calculated by a simple functional model for simulation of the N regime over the winter period (i.e. mineralization and leaching) was 16 kg ha^-1 in the fine and 63 kg N ha^-1 in coarse soils (mean values of the winter periods 1985–1988 from 256 plots).Before the 1960s, the depth of the A_p horizons rarely exceeded 25 cm in arable soils of the former FRG. During the last three decades, ploughing depth has increased to at least 35 cm. The mass balance calculations for total N after ploughing to 35 cm in loess soils of southern Lower Saxony (105 farm plots) yielded a mean increase in total N by about 900 kg ha^-1 in 20 years. With respect to soil organic matter equilibria, N accumulation will continue for at least another 10 years on 67% of the examined farm plots. This study suggests that long term N immobilization is one of the most important sinks for nitrogen in arable soils of Germany. For simulation of the N dynamics over the growing season and for long time periods total nitrogen dynamics need to be considered.     

The effect of three or five years of set-aside on the husbandry and grain yield of subsequent cereal crops in the UK

During the period 1993–1997, at six contrasting sites located throughout England, two successive cereal test crops were grown both with and without nitrogen fertiliser after three or five years of set-aside or after continuous arable cropping. Vegetation during set-aside included natural regeneration and perennial rye-grass (Lolium perenne) with or without white clover (Trifolium repens), managed by mowing on one or more occasions per year. Establishment of the successive cereal test crops after destruction of the set-aside was generally not a problem. Fertile tiller numbers were increased by inclusion of clover in the set-aside cover or application of inorganic nitrogen. The presence of couch grass (Elytrigia repens) or volunteer cereals in the set-aside covers provided alternative hosts for take-all (Gaeumanomyces graminis) and eyespot (Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides) and take-all caused some yield reductions in following cereal crops. Management during the set-aside period significantly affected grain yields of the subsequent cereal crops in the majority of the site-year combinations. However, these effects were not as large as would be expected after traditional break crops and were frequently masked by the application of nitrogen fertiliser. Mean yields increased by 80% due to the application nitrogen at the optimum rate compared to nil nitrogen. Most of the effects of set-aside treatment on grain yield were shown to be attributable to soil mineral nitrogen content, but at some sites, infections by take-all or eyespot also accounted for some of the variation. There were no effects of pests that could be related to treatment. The presence of sown clover during the set-aside period had the most consistent effect across sites, affecting tiller populations, grain yield and grain quality of cereal crops. At some sites, establishing a sown cover during the set-aside period, or cutting the cover more than once a year, improved grain yield and quality, and reduced the incidence of some specific weeds and disease. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Vegetation development and nitrogen dynamics of sown and spontaneous set-aside on arable land

The area of arable land devoted to ecological compensation in Switzerland has increased markedly in the last decade. We studied the influence of plant cover upon nitrogen (N) dynamics in the uppermost soil layer in experimental plots representing three types of ecological compensation area (set-aside sown with two different seed mixtures and without sowing) and a grass-clover ley. Potential losses, apparent uptake and net mineralisation of N were investigated during critical periods: during the early development of the vegetation, after a first mowing, and before and after ploughing and sowing with winter wheat.The four plant-cover types differed in species richness as well as in the proportions of forbs, grasses and legumes, and annuals and perennials. N dynamics varied with time of sampling, but differences between plant-cover types were small, and neither early mowing nor ploughing had a significant effect. We conclude that as far as N dynamics in the uppermost soil layer is concerned, both species-poor and species-rich seed mixtures and natural regeneration can be recommended for set-aside.     

Comparative nesting and feeding ecology of skylarks Alauda arvensis on arable farmland in southern England with special reference to set-aside

1. A study of skylark Alauda arvensis L. breeding ecology in relation to crop type was carried out from April to August 1992 on arable land in southern England. Set-aside land was included in this comparative study.
2. Territory density averaged 0·15 ha⁻¹. It was 2–3 times higher in fields of set-aside and grass, especially permanent pasture, than in winter and spring-sown cereals.
3. Territory size was nearly twice as large in fields of winter cereals (4·5 ha) than in other crop types (2·5 ha). Where set-aside was present on one farm, territory size in set-aside (1·7 ha) was a third lower than in cereals and grass.
4. Nesting began in set-aside and permanent pasture in April and peaked in late May. Nesting was not detected in spring barley until late May and in silage grass until early June. The density of successful nests in set-aside fields was more than double that in any of the arable crop types.
5. Average clutch size at hatching was 3·91 eggs in fields of set-aside, over 15% higher than in silage grass (3·40) and in spring barley (3·27).
6. Fledging success did not differ according to crop type, but productivity, expressed as the number of fledglings produced per hectare, was 0·50 in set-aside, 0·13 in silage grass, and 0·21 in spring barley. Nests with chicks were not found in fields of winter cereals. The causes of chick death were thought to be predation in set-aside fields, farming practices in silage grass fields, and suspected starvation in spring cereals.
7. The potentially high nesting success of skylarks in set-aside implies that sympathetic set-aside management could play an important part in reversing its decline across the European Union.     

Differences among maize cultivars in the utilization of soil nitrate and the related losses of nitrate through leaching

In a 2-year field experiment conducted on a Gleyic Luvisol in Stuttgart-Hohenheim one experimental and nine commercial maize cultivars were compared for their ability to utilize soil nitrate and to reduce related losses of nitrate through leaching. Soil nitrate was monitored periodically in CaCl₂ extracts and in suction cup water. Nitrate concentrations in suction water were generally higher than in CaCl₂ extracts. Both methods revealed that all cultivars examined were able to extract nitrate down to a soil depth of at least 120 cm (1988 season) or 150 cm (1987 season). Significant differences among the cultivars existed in nitrate depletion particularly in the subsoil. At harvest, residual nitrate in the upper 150 cm of the profile ranged from 73–110 kg N ha^–1 in 1987 and from 59–119 kg N ha^–1 in 1988. Residual nitrate was closely correlated with nitrate losses by leaching because water infiltration at 120 cm soil depth started 4 weeks after harvest (1987) or immediately after harvest (1988) and continued until early summer of the following year. The calculated amount of nitrate lost by leaching was strongly influenced by the method of calculation. During the winter of 1987/88 nitrate leaching ranged from 57–84 kg N ha^–1 (suction cups) and 40–55 kg N ha^–1 (CaCl₂ extracts), respectively. The corresponding values for the winter of 1988/89 were 47–79 and 20–39 kg N ha^–1, respectively. ei]Section editor: B E Clothier     

Nitrogen cycling in low input legume-based agriculture,with emphasis on legume/grass pastures

Low input legume-based agriculture exists in a continuum between subsistence farming and intensive arable and pastoral systems. This review covers this range, but with most emphasis on temperate legume/grass pastures under grazing by livestock. Key determinants of nitrogen (N) flows in grazed legume/grass pastures are: inputs of N from symbiotic N₂ fixation which are constrained through self-regulation via grass/legume interactions; large quantities of N cycling through grazing animals with localised return in excreta; low direct conversion of pasture N into produce (typically 5–20%) but with N recycling under intensive grazing the farm efficiency of product N: fixed N can be up to 50%; and regulation of N flows by mineralisation/immobilisation reactions. Pastoral systems reliant solely on fixed N are capable of moderate-high production with modest N losses e.g. average denitrification and leaching losses from grazed pastures of 6 and 23 kg N ha^–1 yr^–1. Methods for improving efficiency of N cycling in legume-based cropping and legume/grass pasture systems are discussed. In legume/arable rotations, the utilisation of fixed N by crops is influenced greatly by the timing of management practices for synchrony of N supply via mineralisation and crop N uptake. In legume/grass pastures, the spatial return of excreta and the uptake of excreta N by pastures can potentially be improved through dietary manipulation and management strategies. Plant species selection and plant constituent modification also offer the potential to increase N efficiency through greater conversion into animal produce, improved N uptake from soil and manipulation of mineralisation/immobilisation/nitrification reactions.     

The use of cover crops in cereal-based cropping systems to control nitrate leaching in SE England

Field experiments were done to evaluate the extent to which cover crops can be used to help farmers comply with current legislation on nitrate leaching from arable land in nitrate vulnerable zones. Nitrate leaching was measured in sandy loam and chalky loam soils under a range of early sown (mid-August) cover crops at two sites in SE England, and in the subsequent winter following their incorporation. Cover crop species tested were forage rape, rye, white mustard, a rye/white mustard mixture, Phacelia and ryegrass. Additional treatments were weeds plus cereal volunteers, a bare fallow and a conventional winter barley crop sown one month later than the cover crops and grown to maturity. Cover crop and bare fallow treatments were followed by spring barley. This was followed by winter barley, as was the conventional winter barley crop. In the winter immediately after establishment, early sown cover crops decreased nitrate leaching by 29–91% compared to bare fallow. They were most effective in a wet winter on the sandy loam where nitrate leaching under bare fallow was greatest. There was little difference between cover crop species with respect to their capacity to decrease nitrate leaching, but losses were consistently smaller under forage rape. The growth of weeds plus cereal volunteers significantly decreased nitrate leaching on the sandy loam compared with a bare fallow, but was less effective on the chalky loam. Nitrate leaching under the later sown winter barley was often greater than under cover crops, but under dry conditions leaching losses were similar. In the longer-term, in most cases, the inclusion of cover crops in predominantly cereal-based cropping systems did not significantly decrease cumulative nitrate leaching compared with two successive winter cereals. In summary, early sown cover crops are most likely to be effective when grown on freely drained sandy soils where the risk of nitrate leaching is greatest. They are less likely to be effective on poorer drained, medium-heavy textured soils in the driest parts of SE England. In these areas the regeneration of weeds and cereal volunteers together with some additional broadcast seed may be sufficient to avoid excessive nitrate losses. In the short-term, mineralization of N derived from the relatively small cover crops grown once every 3–4years in cereal-based cropping systems is unlikely to contribute greatly to nitrate leaching in later years and adjustments to fertilizer N recommendations will not usually be necessary.     

Comparing annual and perennial crops for bioenergy production – influence on nitrate leaching and energy balance

Production of energy crops is promoted as a means to mitigate global warming by decreasing dependency on fossil energy. However, agricultural production of bioenergy can have various environmental effects depending on the crop and production system. In a field trial initiated in 2008, nitrate concentration in soil water was measured below winter wheat, grass‐clover and willow during three growing seasons. Crop water balances were modelled to estimate the amount of nitrate leached per hectare. In addition, dry matter yields and nitrogen (N) yields were measured, and N balances and energy balances were calculated. In willow, nitrate concentrations were up to approximately 20 mg l^?1 nitrate‐N during the establishment year, but declined subsequently to <5 mg l^?1 nitrate‐N, resulting in an annual N leaching loss of 18, 3 and 0.3 kg ha^?1 yr^?1 N in the first 3 years after planting. A similar trend was observed in grass‐clover where concentrations stabilized at 2–4 mg l^?1 nitrate‐N from the beginning of the second growing season, corresponding to leaching of approximately 5 kg ha^?1 yr^?1 N. In winter wheat, an annual N leaching loss of 36–68 kg ha^?1 yr^?1 was observed. For comparison, nitrate leaching was also measured in an old willow crop established in 1996 from which N leaching ranged from 6 to 27 kg ha^?1 yr^?1. Dry matter yields ranged between 5.9 and 14.8 Mg yr^?1 with lowest yield in the newly established willow and the highest yield harvested in grass‐clover. Grass‐clover gave the highest net energy yield of 244 GJ ha^?1 yr^?1, whereas old willow, winter wheat and first rotation willow gave net energy yields of 235, 180 and 105 GJ ha^?1 yr^?1. The study showed that perennial crops can provide high energy yields and significantly reduce N losses compared to annual crops.     

Nitrate leaching from sandy loam soils under a double-cropping forage system estimated from suction-probe measurements

Nitrate leaching from a double-cropping forage system was measured over a 2-year period (June 1994–May 1996) in the Northwest region of Portugal using ceramic cup samplers. The crops were grown for silage making and include maize (from May to September) and a winter crop (rest of the year) consisting of a mixture of cereals and Italian ryegrass. The experiment was performed on two different sites with a history of many years under the same crop and fertiliser management, but differing in the amounts of N applied as fertiliser and by regular cattle slurry applications. The annual nitrate leaching losses measured ranged from 154 to 338 kg N ha^-1. These amounts lead to annual mean concentrations between 22 and 41 mg -N L^-1 in the drained water. The coarse textured soils (sandy loams) and the climatic conditions of the region with more than 600 mm of drainage concentrated between October and March, tended to promote the leaching of all the nitrate-N left in the soil after the maize crop plus the N released by mineralization during the winter period. On these soils, the minimum amount of drainage (necessary to provide the complete leaching of all the nitrate-N in the soil profile in the end of summer), seems to be between 300 and 400 mm. The winter crops removed important quantities of N (83–116 kg N ha^-1) but, due to their late establishment in autumn they did not succeed in taking up the nitrate-N left in the soil after the maize crop. Approaches for reducing the nitrate leaching losses in this particular system are discussed.     

Nitrogen inputs and losses from New Zealand dairy farmlets, as affected by nitrogen fertilizer application: year one

Inputs and losses of nitrogen (N) were determined in dairy cow farmlets receiving 0, 225 or 360 kg N ha^-1 (in split applications as urea) in the first year of a large grazing experiment near Hamilton, New Zealand. Cows grazed perennial ryegrass/white clover pastures all year round on a free-draining soil. N₂ fixation was estimated (using ¹⁵N dilution) to be 212, 165 and 74 kg N ha^-1 yr^-1 in the 0, 225 and 360 N treatments, respectively. The intermediate N rate had little effect on clover growth during spring but favoured more total pasture cover in summer and autumn, thereby reducing overgrazing and resulting in 140% more clover growth during the latter period.Removal of N in milk was 76,89 and 92 kg N ha^-1 in the 0, 225 and 360 N treatments, respectively. Denitrification losses were low (7–14 kg N ha^-1 yr^-1), increased with N application, and occurred predominantly during winter. Ammonia volatilization was estimated by micrometeorological mass balance at 15, 45 and 63 kg N ha^-1 yr^-1 in the 0, 225 and 360 N treatments, respectively. Most of the increase in ammonia loss was attributed to direct loss after application of the urea fertilizer.Leaching of nitrate was estimated (using ceramic cup samplers at 1 m soil depth, in conjunction with lysimeters) to be 13, 18 and 31 kg N ha^-1 yr^-1 in a year of relatively low rainfall (990 mm yr^-1) and drainage (170–210 mm yr^-1). Drainage was lower in the N fertilized treatments and this was attributed to enhanced evapotranspiration associated with increased grass growth.Nitrate-N concentrations in leachates increased gradually over time to 30 mg L^-1 in the 360 N treatment whereas there was little temporal variation evident in the 0 (mean 6.4 mg L^-1) and 225 (mean 10.1 mg L^-1) N treatments. Thus, the 360 N treatment had a major effect by greatly reducing N₂ fixation and increasing N losses, whereas the 225 N treatment had little effect on N₂ fixation or on nitrate leaching. However, these results refer to the first year of the experiment and further measurements over time will determine the longer-term effects of these treatments on N inputs, transformations and losses.     

Key processes of the nitrogen cycle in an irrigated and a non-irrigated grazed pasture

The paper presents integrated measurements of N fixation, net mineralisation, pasture yield and change in soil mineral N over a 12 month period for dairy pastures on a sandy loam soil in the South East of South Australia. The two adjacent pastures studied were an irrigated perennial white clover-ryegrass and an annual non-irrigated subterranean clover with mixed annual grasses. This produced the most comprehensive mineral N balance reported for grazed pastures, to the authors' knowledge, allowing calculation of gaseous and leaching losses of N (210 kg ha^–1 in the irrigated and paddock and 81 kg ha^–1 in the non irrigated paddock) primarily from urine patches. In both paddocks these losses were about three times the N yield in milk (61 and 28 kg N ha^–1 respectively) and were replenished by biological N fixation (294 and 100 kg N ha^–1). However, mineralisation of soil organic N, excretal N and pasture residues (687 and 438 kg N ha^–1) was the major source of mineral N for cycling and losses. The results demonstrate the enormous impact of pasture management on N fluxes and reinforce the importance of livestock urine on the magnitude of N fluxes including gaseous and leaching losses.     

Fate of urine nitrogen on mineral and peat soils in New Zealand

A field lysimeter experiment was conducted over 150 days to examine the fate of synthetic urinary nitrogen (N) applied to peat and mineral soils, with and without a water table. At the start of the winter season, synthetic urine labelled with ¹⁵N, was applied at 500 kg N ha^–1. Plant uptake, leaching losses and nitrous oxide (N₂O) fluxes were monitored. Total plant uptake ranged from 11% to 35% of the urine-N applied depending on soil type and treatment. Plant uptake of applied N was greater in the presence of a water table in the mineral soil. Nitrate-N (NO₃ ^--N) was only detected in leachates from the mineral soil, at concentrations up to 146 g NO₃ ^--N mL^–1. Presence of a water table in the mineral soil reduced leaching losses (as inorganic-N) from 47% to 6%, incrased plant uptake and doubled apparent denitrification losses. In the peat soils leaching losses of applied urine-N as inorganic-N were low (<5%). Losses of N as N₂O were greater in the mineral soil than in the peat soils, with losses of 3% and <1% of N applied respectively after 100 days. Apparent denitrification losses far exceeded N₂O losses and it is postulated that the difference could be due to dinitrogen (N₂) loss and soil entrapment of N₂.     

Simulated nitrogen dynamics and nitrate leaching in a perennial grass ley

A soil nitrogen model was used for a 4-year simulation of nitrogen dynamics and nitrate leaching, both during grass ley growth and after ploughing a grass ley. Model results were compared with field measurements of soil mineral-N status and leaching. A soil water and heat model provided daily values for abiotic conditions, which were used as driving variables in the nitrogen simulation. Simulated values for mineral-N levels in the soil agreed well with field data for the first 3 years of the simulation. During the final year the model predicted considerably higher levels of soil mineral-N content compared with measurements. To reach the mineral-N level measured at the time of ploughing the ley, the simulated N-uptake by plants had to be increased by 8 g N m⁻². Simulations of nitrate leaching suggested that estimates of leaching based on measurements in tile-drained plots can be considerably underestimated. Accurate quantification of leaching in tile-drained plots often requires additional information on water-flow paths. A substantial increase in simulated and measured values for the mineral-N content of the soil occurred after ploughing the ley. In the simulation, most of the increase was due to a high crop residue input and the absence of a growing crop after ploughing. Litter accumulations in the soil during the 4-year period contributed little to the increase in soil mineral-N.     

Effect of cultivation on the mineralization of nitrogen in soil

Summary The effect of cultivation (ploughing followed by rotavation) on the mineralization of soil nitrogen was measured at 2 sites on a silt loam soil. Both sites had a predominantly arable cropping history but one had been under grass for the previous 2 years and the other had carried wheat. Mineralization of N was slightly faster in cultivated soil but the difference was only significant at the site previously under grass. At this site cultivated soil contained 7 kg ha^–1 more mineral N than uncultivated soil 2 weeks after treatment, and 9 kg ha^–1 after 6 weeks. The corresponding figures for the site that had grown wheat were 4 and 6 kg N ha^–1.     

Assessing German farmers’ attitudes regarding nature conservation set-aside in regions dominated by arable farming

This paper presents an analysis of the attitudes of farmers towards a policy approach that combines the instrument of set-aside of farmland with agri-environmental measures under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) for achieving nature goals. One of the stated objectives of current agricultural and environmental policies is to give greater consideration to issues of nature conservation in agricultural landscapes. To fulfil this objective, there is an urgent need to develop approaches that, on the one hand, are capable of delivering tangible improvements in the ecological situation and nature conservation in agriculture and, on the other hand, are structured in such a way that farmers are willing to put them into practice. In addition, such approaches need to be economical and affordable for society. The Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) has developed the concept of ‘nature-conservation set-aside’, especially for landscapes that are under predominantly arable use. Conservation set-aside refers to parts of arable farmland especially well suited to nature conservation, which are mandatorily withdrawn from agricultural production (for those who claim payment) and on which ecologically valuable habitats are created through specific management activities. To determine what kind of problems might arise for farmers in the course of implementing this concept as an agri-environmental measure, a survey was carried out in four largely arable regions of Germany. The results of this survey show the attitudes of German farmers regarding set-aside farmland for nature conservation in regions dominated by arable farming, and they demonstrate which factors influence the implementation of conservation set-aside.     

Crop uptake and leaching of 15N applied in ruminant slurry with selectively labelled faeces and urine fractions

Two animal slurries either labelled with ¹⁵N in the urine or in the faeces fraction, were produced by feeding a sheep with unlabelled and ¹⁵N-labelled hay and collecting faeces and urine separately. The slurries were applied (12 g total N ^-2) to a coarse sand and a sandy loam soil confined in lysimeters and growing spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L). Reference lysimeters without slurry were supplied with¹⁵ NH₄ ¹⁵NO³ corresponding to the inorganic N applied with the slurries (6 g N m^-2). In the second year, all lysimeters received unlabelled mineral fertilizer (6 g N m^-2) and grew spring barley. N harvested in the two crops (grain + straw) and the loss of nitrate by leaching were determined. ¹⁵N in the urine fraction was less available for crop uptake than mineral fertilizer ¹⁵N. The first barley crop on the sandy loam removed 49% of the ¹⁵N applied in mineral fertilizer and 36% of that applied with urine. The availability of fertilizer ¹⁵N (36%) and urine¹⁵ N (32%) differed less on the coarse sand. Of the¹⁵ N added with the faeces fraction, 12–14% was taken up by the barley crop on the two soils. N mineralized from faeces compensated for the reduced availability of urine N providing a similar or higher crop N uptake in manured lysimeters compared with mineral fertilized ones.About half of the total N uptake in the first crop originated from the N applied either as slurry or mineral fertilizer. The remaining N was derived from the soil N pool. Substantially smaller but similar proportions of¹⁵ N from faeces, urine and fertilizer were found in the second crop. The similar recoveries indicated a slow mineralization rate of the residual faeces N since more faeces was left in the soil after the first crop.More N was lost by leaching from manured lysimeters but as a percentage of N applied, losses were similar to those from mineral fertilizer. During the first and second winter, 3–5% and 1–3%, respectively, of the ¹⁵N in slurry and mineral fertilizer was leached as nitrate. Thus slurry N applied in spring just before sowing did not appear to be more prone to loss by nitrate leaching than N given in mineral fertilizer. Slurry N accounted for a higher proportion of the N leached, however, because more N was added in this treatment.     

Accumulation and Loss of Nitrogen in White Clover (Trifolium repens L.) Plant Organs as Affected by Defoliation Regime on Two Sites in Norway

In order to improve the basis for utilising nitrogen (N) fixed by white clover (Trifolium repens L.) in northern agriculture, we studied how defoliation stress affected the N contents of major plant organs in late autumn, N losses during the winter and N accumulation in the following spring. Plants were established from stolon cuttings and transplanted to pots that were dug into the field at Apelsvoll Research Centre (60°42′ N, 10°51′ E) and at Holt Research Centre (69°40′ N, 18°56′ E) in spring 2001 and 2002. During the first growing season, the plants were totally stripped of leaves down to the stolon basis, cut at 4 cm height or left undisturbed. The plants were sampled destructively in late autumn, early spring the second year and after 6 weeks of new spring growth. The plant material was sorted into leaves, stolons and roots. Defoliation regime did not influence the total amount of leaf N harvested during and at the end of the first growing season. However, for intensively defoliated plants, the repeated leaf removal and subsequent regrowth occurred at the expense of stolon and root development and resulted in a 61–85% reduction in the total plant N present in late autumn and a 21–59% reduction in total accumulation of plant N (plant N present in autumn + previously harvested leaf N). During the winter, the net N loss from leaf tissue (N not recovered in living nor dead leaves in the spring) ranged from 57% to 74% of the N present in living leaves in the autumn, while N stored in stolons and roots was much better conserved. However, the winter loss of stolon N from severely defoliated plants (19%) was significantly larger than from leniently defoliated (12%) and non-defoliated plants (6%). Moreover, the fraction of stolon N determined as dead in the spring was 63% for severely defoliated as compared to 14% for non-defoliated plants. Accumulation in absolute terms of new leaf N during the spring was highly correlated to total plant N in early spring (R² = 0.86), but the growth rates relative to plant N present in early spring were not and, consequently, were similar for all treatments. The amount of inorganic N in the soil after snowmelt and the N uptake in plant root simulator probes (PRS^TM) during the spring were small, suggesting that microbial immobilisation, leaching and gas emissions may have been important pathways for N lost from plant tissue.     

The case for headland set-aside: consideration of whole-farm gross margins and grain production on two farms with contrasting rotations

Spreadsheet calculations were used to compare headland set-aside with rotational set-aside in terms of gross margin and grain production on two farms with contrasting rotations. At Broom's Barn, Suffolk there was a five course rotation consisting of sugar beet and four cereals, while at Bunny Park, Nottinghamshire oilseed rape was the break crop, followed by three cereals. For both farms a sensitivity analysis was used to investigate the effect of the proportion of the farm required to be set aside, the extent of headland yield reduction and the cereal price on the outcome of the spreadsheet calculations. In general headland set-aside out-performed rotational set-aside. Yields on headlands were always less than the main body of the field, but it was on the turning headlands where yield was particularly depressed. Thus the advantage, in terms of gross margin, of setting aside the headlands was greatest when the requirement could be fulfilled by fallowing most turning headlands, but no non-turning headlands. Generally, rotational set-aside reduced grain production more than headland set-aside, but when the spreadsheet models were adjusted to maintain the area of sugar beet, the situation was reversed. In this case headland set-aside produced a larger gross margin and had the greatest impact on grain production. An extension of the analysis is to ask the question: even if set aside is not an option, is it worthwhile to crop rather than fallow headlands? For cereals and oilseed rape the answer is in the affirmative; the gross margin for headlands remains positive, even when prices are much reduced, because the arable area payment more than offsets the variable costs. This does not hold for crops such as sugar beet that are not eligible for arable area payments. An additional benefit from headland set-aside is its potential to enhance the environment through increased habitat diversity and the provision of ‘buffer zones’ to prevent agrochemicals from drifting into hedges and watercourses.     

Contributions to nitrogen leaching and pasture uptake by autumn-applied dairy effluent and ammonium fertilizer labeled with 15N isotope

The objective of this study was to compare the N leaching loss and pasture N uptake from autumn-applied dairy shed effluent and ammonium fertilizer (NH₄Cl) labeled with ¹⁵N, using intact soil lysimeters (80 cm diameter, 120 cm depth). The soil used was a sandy loam, and the pasture was a mixture of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and white clover (Trifolium repens). The DSE and NH₄Cl were applied twice annually in autumn (May) and late spring (November), each at 200 kg N ha^-1. The N applied in May 1996 was labeled with ¹⁵N. The lysimeters were either spray or flood irrigated during the summer. The autumn-applied DSE resulted in lower N leaching losses compared with NH₄Cl. However, the N applied in the autumn had a higher potential for leaching than N applied in late spring. Between 4.5–8.1% of the ¹⁵N-labeled mineral N in the DSE and 15.1–18.8% of the ¹⁵N-labeled NH₄Cl applied in the autumn were leached within a year of application. Of the annual N leaching losses in the DSE treatments (16.0–26.9 kg N ha^-1), a fifth (20.3–22.9%) was from the mineral N fraction of the DSE applied in the autumn, with the remaining larger proportion from the organic fraction of the DSE, soil N and N applied in spring. In the NH₄Cl treatments, more than half (53.8–64.8%) of the annual N leaching loss (55.9–57.6 kg N ha^-1) was derived from the autumn-applied NH₄Cl. DSE was as effective as NH₄Cl in stimulating pasture production. Since only 4.4–4.5% of the annual herbage N uptake in the DSE treatment and 12.3–13.3% in the NH₄Cl treatment were derived from the autumn-applied mineral N, large proportions of the annual herbage N uptake must have been derived from the N applied in spring, the organic N fraction in the DSE, soil N and N fixed by clover. The recoveries of ¹⁵N in the herbage were similar between the DSE and the NH₄Cl treatments, but those in the leachate were over 50% less from the DSE than from the NH₄Cl treatment. The lower leaching loss of ¹⁵N in the DSE treatment was attributed to the stimulated microbial activities and increased immobilization following the application of DSE. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.