Small nucleolar RNA

The review considers small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), an abundant group of non-protein-coding RNAs. In association with proteins, snoRNAs determine the two most common nucleotide modifications in rRNA and some other cell RNAs: 2′-O-methylation of ribose and pseudouridylation. In addition, snoRNAs are involved in pre-mRNA cleavage and the telomerase function. Almost all snoRNAs fall into two families, C/D and H/ACA, distinguished by conserved sequence boxes. Although the proteins of C/D and H/ACA snoRNPs have homologous regions, these snoRNPs are assembled differently. The RNA components of RNases P and MRP are also classed with snoRNAs. Another problem considered is the structure and function of small RNAs from Cajal bodies (small organelles associated with the nucleoli), which are similar to snoRNAs.     

Small nucleolar RNA genes

Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are one of the most numerous and well-studied groups of non-protein-coding RNAs. In complex with proteins, snoRNAs perform the two most common nucleotide modifications in rRNA: 2′-OH-methylation of ribose and pseudouridylation. Although the modification mechanisms and snoRNP structures are highly conserved, the snoRNA genes are surprisingly diverse in organization. In addition to genes transcribed independently, there are genes that are in introns of other genes, form clusters transcribed from a common promoter, or clusters in introns. Interestingly, one type of gene organization usually prevails in different taxa. Vertebrate snoRNAs mostly originate from introns of protein-coding genes; a small group of snoRNAs are encoded by introns of genes for noncoding RNAs.     

Small nucleolar RNA genes

Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are one of the most numerous and well-studied groups of non-protein-coding RNAs. In complex with proteins, snoRNAs perform the two most common nucleotide modifications in rRNA: 2'-O-methylation of ribose and pseudouridylation. Although the modification mechanisms and shoRNA structures are highly conserved, the snoRNA genes are surprisingly diverse in organization. In addition to genes transcribed independently, there are genes that are in introns of other genes, form clusters transcribed from a common promoter, or cluster in introns. Interestingly. one type of gene organization usually prevails in different taxa. Vertebrate snoRNAs mostly originate from introns of protein-coding genes; a small group of snoRNAs are encoded by introns of genes for noncoding RNAs.     

Yeast snR30 is a small nucleolar RNA required for 18S rRNA synthesis.

Subnuclear fractionation and coprecipitation by antibodies against the nucleolar protein NOP1 demonstrate that the essential Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA snR30 is localized to the nucleolus. By using aminomethyl trimethyl-psoralen, snR30 can be cross-linked in vivo to 35S pre-rRNA. To determine whether snR30 has a role in rRNA processing, a conditional allele was constructed by replacing the authentic SNR30 promoter with the GAL10 promoter. Repression of snR30 synthesis results in a rapid depletion of snR30 and a progressive increase in cell doubling time. rRNA processing is disrupted during the depletion of snR30; mature 18S rRNA and its 20S precursor underaccumulate, and an aberrant 23S pre-rRNA intermediate can be detected. Initial results indicate that this 23S pre-rRNA is the same as the species detected on depletion of the small nucleolar RNA-associated proteins NOP1 and GAR1 and in an snr10 mutant strain. It was found that the 3' end of 23S pre-rRNA is located in the 3' region of ITS1 between cleavage sites A2 and B1 and not, as previously suggested, at the B1 site, snR30 is the fourth small nucleolar RNA shown to play a role in rRNA processing.     

Locus-specific ribosomal RNA gene silencing in nucleolar dominance

The silencing of one parental set of rRNA genes in a genetic hybrid is an epigenetic phenomenon known as nucleolar dominance. We showed previously that silencing is restricted to the nucleolus organizer regions (NORs), the loci where rRNA genes are tandemly arrayed, and does not spread to or from neighboring protein-coding genes. One hypothesis is that nucleolar dominance is the net result of hundreds of silencing events acting one rRNA gene at a time. A prediction of this hypothesis is that rRNA gene silencing should occur independent of chromosomal location. An alternative hypothesis is that the regulatory unit in nucleolar dominance is the NOR, rather than each individual rRNA gene, in which case NOR localization may be essential for rRNA gene silencing. To test these alternative hypotheses, we examined the fates of rRNA transgenes integrated at ectopic locations. The transgenes were accurately transcribed in all independent transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana lines tested, indicating that NOR localization is not required for rRNA gene expression. Upon crossing the transgenic A. thaliana lines as ovule parents with A. lyrata to form F1 hybrids, a new system for the study of nucleolar dominance, the endogenous rRNA genes located within the A. thaliana NORs are silenced. However, rRNA transgenes escaped silencing in multiple independent hybrids. Collectively, our data suggest that rRNA gene activation can occur in a gene-autonomous fashion, independent of chromosomal location, whereas rRNA gene silencing in nucleolar dominance is locus-dependent.     

核仁小RNA 在肿瘤发生中的作用

核仁小RNA（small nucleolar RNA,snoRNA）是一类真核细胞核仁中的60～300个核苷酸长度的非编码RNA,主要参与rRNA和其它小RNA转录后的成熟加工过程. 它们与肿瘤的关系曾一度被人们所忽视,然而,近年来有关snoRNA新功能的研究证明,它们与肿瘤的发生、发展密切相关. snoRNA以多种方式参与肿瘤的发生：一些snoRNA（如：U50、SNORD12、SNORD12b、SNORD12c、SNORD44和h5sn2等）具有抑癌活性,而另一些snoRNA（如：SNORD33、SNORD66、SNORD76、SNORD112、SNORD113、SNORD114、SNORA42、U70C和ACA59B等）具有促癌活性. 另外,编码snoRNA基因的异常也被发现与肿瘤的发生有关. 因此,开展snoRNA与肿瘤关系的研究将有可能为肿瘤诊治提供新线索.     

Nucleolar targeting of 5S RNA in Xenopus laevis oocytes: Somatic-type nucleotide substitutions enhance nucleolar localization

In Xenopus laevis oocytes, 5S RNA is stored in the cytoplasm until vitellogenesis, at which time it is imported into the nucleus and targeted to nucleoli for ribosome assembly. This article shows that throughout oogenesis there is a pool of nuclear 5S RNA which is not nucleolar-associated. This distribution reflects that of oocyte-type 5S RNA, which is the major 5S RNA species in oocytes; only small amounts of somatic-type, which differs by six nucleotides, are synthesized. Indeed, ³²P-labeled oocyte-type 5S RNA showed a degree of nucleolar localization similar to endogenous 5S RNA (33%) after microinjection. In contrast, ³²P-labeled somatic-type 5S RNA showed significantly enhanced localization, whereby 70% of nuclear RNA was associated with nucleoli. A chimeric RNA molecule containing only one somatic-specific nucleotide substitution also showed enhanced localization, in addition to other somatic-specific phenotypes, including enhanced nuclear import and ribosome incorporation. The distribution of ³⁵S-labeled ribosomal protein L5 was similar to that of oocyte-type 5S RNA, even when preassembled with somatic-type 5S RNA. The distribution of a series of 5S RNA mutants was also analyzed. These mutants showed various degrees of localization, suggesting that the efficiency of nucleolar targeting can be influenced by many discrete regions of the 5S RNA molecule. J. Cell. Biochem. 69:490–505, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Box C/D small nucleolar RNA trafficking involves small nucleolar RNP proteins, nucleolar factors and a novel nuclear domain

Nucleolar localization of box C/D small nucleolar (sno) RNAs requires the box C/D motif and, in vertebrates, involves transit through Cajal bodies (CB). We report that in yeast, overexpression of a box C/D reporter leads to a block in the localization pathway with snoRNA accumulation in a specific sub-nucleolar structure, the nucleolar body (NB). The human survival of motor neuron protein (SMN), a marker of gems/CB, specifically localizes to the NB when expressed in yeast, supporting similarities between these structures. Box C/D snoRNA accumulation in the NB was decreased by mutation of Srp40 and increased by mutation of Nsr1p, two related nucleolar proteins that are homologous to human Nopp140 and nucleolin, respectively. Box C/D snoRNAs also failed to accumulate in the NB, and became delocalized to the nucleoplasm, upon depletion of any of the core snoRNP proteins, Nop1p/fibrillarin, Snu13p, Nop56p and Nop5p/Nop58p. We conclude that snoRNP assembly occurs either in the nucleoplasm, or during transit of snoRNAs through the NB, followed by routing of the complete snoRNP to functional sites of ribosome synthesis.