Control of pH and PIP2 gating in heteromeric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels by H-Bonding at the helix-bundle crossing

Inhibition by intracellular H(+) (pH gating) and activation by phosphoinositides such as PIP(2) (PIP(2)-gating) are key regulatory mechanisms in the physiology of inwardly-rectifying potassium (Kir) channels. Our recent findings suggest that PIP(2) gating and pH gating are controlled by an intra-subunit H-bond at the helix-bundle crossing between a lysine in TM1 and a backbone carbonyl group in TM2. This interaction only occurs in the closed state and channel opening requires this H-bond to be broken, thereby influencing the kinetics of PIP(2) and pH gating in Kir channels. In this addendum, we explore the role of H-bonding in heteromeric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels. Kir5.1 subunits do not possess a TM1 lysine. However, homology modelling and molecular dynamics simulations demonstrate that the TM1 lysine in Kir4.1 is capable of H-bonding at the helix-bundle crossing. Consistent with this, the rates of pH and PIP2 gating in Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels (two H-bonds) were intermediate between those of wild-type homomeric Kir4.1 (four H-bonds) and Kir4.1(K67M) channels (no H-bonds) suggesting that the number of H-bonds in the tetrameric channel complex determines the gating kinetics. Furthermore, in heteromeric Kir4.1(K67M)/Kir5.1 channels, where the two remaining H-bonds are disrupted, we found that the gating kinetics were similar to Kir4.1(K67M) homomeric channels despite the fact that these two channels differ considerably in their PIP(2) affinities. This indicates that Kir channel PIP(2) affinity has little impact on either the PIP(2) or pH gating kinetics.     

Control of pH and PIP2 Gating in Heteromeric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 Channels by H-Bonding at the Helix-Bundle Crossing

Inhibition by intracellular H⁺ (pH gating) and activation by phosphoinositides such as PIP₂ (PIP₂ gating) are key regulatory mechanisms in the physiology of inwardly-rectifying potassium (Kir) channels. Our recent findings suggest that PIP₂ gating and pH gating are controlled by an intrasubunit H-bond at the helix-bundle crossing between a lysine in TM1 and a backbone carbonyl group in TM2. This interaction only occurs in the closed state and channel opening requires this H-bond to be broken, thereby influencing the kinetics of PIP₂- and pH-gating in Kir channels. In this addendum, we explore the role of H-bonding in heteromeric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels. Kir5.1 subunits do not possess a TM1 lysine. However, homology modelling and molecular dynamics simulations demonstrate that the TM1 lysine in Kir4.1 is capable of H-bonding at the helix-bundle crossing. Consistent with this, the rates of pH and PIP₂ gating in Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels (two H-bonds) were intermediate between those of wild-type homomeric Kir4.1 (four H-bonds) and Kir4.1(K67M) channels (no H-bonds) suggesting that the number of H-bonds in the tetrameric channel complex determines the gating kinetics. Furthermore, in heteromeric Kir4.1(K67M)/Kir5.1 channels, where the two remaining H-bonds are disrupted, we found that the gating kinetics were similar to Kir4.1(K67M) homomeric channels despite the fact that these two channels differ considerably in their PIP₂ affinities. This indicates that Kir channel PIP₂ affinity has little impact on either the PIP₂- or pH-gating kinetics.     

Identification of a heteromeric interaction that influences the rectification,gating, and pH sensitivity of Kir4.1/Kir5.1 potassium channels

Heteromultimerization between different potassium channel subunits can generate channels with novel functional properties and thus contributes to the rich functional diversity of this gene family. The inwardly rectifying potassium channel subunit Kir5.1 exhibits highly selective heteromultimerization with Kir4.1 to generate heteromeric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels with unique rectification and kinetic properties. These novel channels are also inhibited by intracellular pH within the physiological range and are thought to play a key role in linking K+ and H+ homeostasis by the kidney. However, the mechanisms that control heteromeric K+ channel assembly and the structural elements that generate their unique functional properties are poorly understood. In this study we identify residues at an intersubunit interface between the cytoplasmic domains of Kir5.1 and Kir4.1 that influence the novel rectification and gating properties of heteromeric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels and that also contribute to their pH sensitivity. Furthermore, this interaction presents a structural mechanism for the functional coupling of these properties and explains how specific heteromeric interactions can contribute to the novel functional properties observed in heteromeric Kir channels. The highly conserved nature of this structural association between Kir subunits also has implications for understanding the general mechanisms of Kir channel gating and their regulation by intracellular pH.     

H bonding at the helix-bundle crossing controls gating in Kir potassium channels

Specific stimuli such as intracellular H+ and phosphoinositides (e.g., PIP2) gate inwardly rectifying potassium (Kir) channels by controlling the reversible transition between the closed and open states. This gating mechanism underlies many aspects of Kir channel physiology and pathophysiology; however, its structural basis is not well understood. Here, we demonstrate that H+ and PIP2 use a conserved gating mechanism defined by similar structural changes in the transmembrane (TM) helices and the selectivity filter. Our data support a model in which the gating motion of the TM helices is controlled by an intrasubunit hydrogen bond between TM1 and TM2 at the helix-bundle crossing, and we show that this defines a common gating motif in the Kir channel superfamily. Furthermore, we show that this proposed H-bonding interaction determines Kir channel pH sensitivity, pH and PIP2 gating kinetics, as well as a K+-dependent inactivation process at the selectivity filter and therefore many of the key regulatory mechanisms of Kir channel physiology.     

Kir5.1 underlies long-lived subconductance levels in heteromeric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels from Xenopus tropicalis

The inwardly-rectifying potassium channel subunit Kir5.1 selectively co-assembles with members of the Kir4.0 subfamily to form novel pH-sensitive heteromeric channels with unique single channel properties. In this study, we have cloned orthologs of Kir4.1 and Kir5.1 from the genome of the amphibian, Xenopus tropicalis (Xt). Heteromeric XtKir4.1/XtKir5.1 channels exhibit similar macroscopic current properties to rat Kir4.1/Kir5.1 with a faster time-dependent rate of activation. However, single channel analysis of heteromeric XtKir4.1/XtKir5.1 channels reveals that they have markedly different long-lived, multi-level subconductance states. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the XtKir5.1 subunit is responsible for these prominent subconductance levels. These results are consistent with a model in which the slow transitions between sublevel states represent the movement of individual subunits. These novel channels now provide an excellent model system to determine the structural basis of subconductance levels and contribution of heteromeric pore architecture to this process.     

Biophysical and molecular mechanisms underlying the modulation of heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channels by CO2 and pH

CO2 chemoreception may be related to modulation of inward rectifier K+ channels (Kir channels) in brainstem neurons. Kir4.1 is expressed predominantly in the brainstem and inhibited during hypercapnia. Although the homomeric Kir4.1 only responds to severe intracellular acidification, coexpression of Kir4.1 with Kir5.1 greatly enhances channel sensitivities to CO2 and pH. To understand the biophysical and molecular mechanisms underlying the modulation of these currents by CO2 and pH, heteromeric Kir4. 1-Kir5.1 were studied in inside-out patches. These Kir4.1-Kir5.1 currents showed a single channel conductance of 59 pS with open-state probability (P(open)) approximately 0.4 at pH 7.4. Channel activity reached the maximum at pH 8.5 and was completely suppressed at pH 6.5 with pKa 7.45. The effect of low pH on these currents was due to selective suppression of P(open) without evident effects on single channel conductance, leading to a decrease in the channel mean open time and an increase in the mean closed time. At pH 8.5, single-channel currents showed two sublevels of conductance at approximately 1/4 and 3/4 of the maximal openings. None of them was affected by lowering pH. The Kir4.1-Kir5.1 currents were modulated by phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) that enhanced baseline P(open) and reduced channel sensitivity to intracellular protons. In the presence of 10 microM PIP2, the Kir4.1-Kir5.1 showed a pKa value of 7.22. The effect of PIP2, however, was not seen in homomeric Kir4.1 currents. The CO2/pH sensitivities were related to a lysine residue in the NH2 terminus of Kir4.1. Mutation of this residue (K67M, K67Q) completely eliminated the CO2 sensitivity of both homomeric Kir4.1 and heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1. In excised patches, interestingly, the Kir4.1-Kir5.1 carrying K67M mutation remained sensitive to low pHi. Such pH sensitivity, however, disappeared in the presence of PIP2. The effect of PIP2 on shifting the titration curve of wild-type and mutant channels was totally abolished when Arg178 in Kir5.1 was mutated. Thus, these studies demonstrate a heteromeric Kir channel that can be modulated by both acidic and alkaline pH, show the modulation of pH sensitivity of Kir channels by PIP2, and provide information of the biophysical and molecular mechanisms underlying the Kir modulation by intracellular protons.     

Differential assembly of inwardly rectifying K+ channel subunits, Kir4.1 and Kir5.1, in brain astrocytes

The inwardly rectifying K+ channel subunit Kir5.1 is expressed abundantly in the brain, but its precise distribution and function are still largely unknown. Because Kir5.1 is co-expressed with Kir4.1 in retinal glial Muller cells, we have compared the biochemical and immunological properties of Kir5.1 and Kir4.1 in the mouse brain. Immunoprecipitation experiments suggested that brain expressed at least two subsets of Kir channels, heteromeric Kir4.1/5.1 and homomeric Kir4.1. Immunolabeling using specific antibodies showed that channels comprising Kir4.1 and Kir5.1 subunits were assembled in a region-specific fashion. Heteromeric Kir4.1/5.1 was identified in the neocortex and in the glomeruli of the olfactory bulb. Homomeric Kir4.1 was confined to the hippocampus and the thalamus. Homomeric Kir5.1 was not identified. Kir4.1/5.1 and Kir4.1 expression appeared to occur only in astrocytes, specifically in the membrane domains facing the pia mater and blood vessels or in the processes surrounding synapses. Both Kir4.1/5.1 and Kir4.1 could be associated with PDZ domain-containing syntrophins, which might be involved in the subcellular targeting of these astrocyte Kir channels. Because heteromeric Kir4.1/5.1 and homomeric Kir4.1 have distinct ion channel properties (Tanemoto, M., Kittaka, N., Inanobe, A., and Kurachi, Y. (2000) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 525, 587-592 and Tucker, S. J., Imbrici, P., Salvatore, L., D'Adamo, M. C., and Pessia, M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 16404-16407), it is plausible that these channels play differential physiological roles in the K+ -buffering action of brain astrocytes in a region-specific manner.     

pH dependence of the inwardly rectifying potassium channel, Kir5.1, and localization in renal tubular epithelia

The physiological role of the inwardly rectifying potassium channel, Kir5.1, is poorly understood, as is the molecular identity of many renal potassium channels. In this study we have used Kir5.1-specific antibodies to reveal abundant expression of Kir5.1 in renal tubular epithelial cells, where Kir4.1 is also expressed. Moreover, we also show that Kir5.1/Kir4.1 heteromeric channel activity is extremely sensitive to inhibition by intracellular acidification and that this novel property is conferred predominantly by the Kir5.1 subunit. These findings suggest that Kir5.1/Kir4.1 heteromeric channels are likely to exist in vivo and implicate an important and novel functional role for the Kir5.1 subunit.     

Differential expression and distribution of Kir5.1 and Kir4.1 inwardly rectifying K+ channels in retina

Kir5.1 is an inwardly rectifying K⁺ channel subunit whose functional role has not been fully elucidated. Expression and distribution of Kir5.1 in retina were examined with a specific polyclonal antibody. Kir5.1 immunoreactivity was detected in glial Müller cells and in some retinal neurons. In the Kir5.1-positive neurons the expression of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD₆₅) was detected, suggesting that they may be GABAergic-amacrine cells. In Müller cells, spots of Kir5.1 immunoreactivity distributed diffusely at the cell body and in the distal portions, where Kir4.1 immunoreactivity largely overlapped. In addition, Kir4.1 immunoreactivity without Kir5.1 was strongly concentrated at the endfoot of Müller cells facing the vitreous surface or in the processes surrounding vessels. The immunoprecipitant obtained from retina with anti-Kir4.1 antibody contained Kir5.1. These results suggest that heterotetrameric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels may exist in the cell body and distal portion of Müller cells, whereas homomeric Kir4.1 channels are clustered in the endfeet and surrounding vessels. It is possible that homomeric Kir4.1 and heteromeric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels play different functional roles in the K⁺-buffering action of Müller cells. inwardly rectifying potassium channel; heteromerization; glial Müller cells; amacrine cells; potassium siphoning     

The (beta)gamma subunits of G proteins gate a K(+) channel by pivoted bending of a transmembrane segment

The molecular mechanism of ion channel gating remains unclear. Using approaches such as proline scanning mutagenesis and homology modeling, we localize the gate of the K(+) channels controlled by the (beta)gamma subunits of G proteins at the pore-lining bundle crossing of the second transmembrane (TM2) helices. We show that the flexibility afforded by a highly conserved glycine residue in the middle of TM2 is crucial for channel gating. In contrast, flexibility introduced immediately below the gate disrupts gating. We propose that the force produced by channel-G(beta)gamma interactions is transduced through the rigid region below the helix bundle crossing to bend TM2 at the glycine that serves as a hinge and open the gate.     

Role of conserved glycines in pH gating of Kir1.1 (ROMK)

Gating of inward rectifier Kir1.1 potassium channels by internal pH is believed to occur when large hydrophobic leucines, on each of the four subunits, obstruct the permeation path at the cytoplasmic end of the inner transmembrane helices (TM2). In this study, we examined whether closure of the channel at this point involves bending of the inner helix at one or both of two highly conserved glycine residues (corresponding to G134 and G143 in KirBac1.1) that have been proposed as putative "gating hinges" for potassium channels. Replacement of these conserved inner helical glycines by less flexible alanines did not abolish gating but shifted the apparent pKa from 6.6 +/- 0.01 (wild-type) to 7.1 +/- 0.01 for G157A-Kir1.1b, and to 7.3 +/- 0.01 for G148A-Kir1.1b. When both glycines were mutated the effect was additive, shifting the pKa by 1.2 pH units to 7.8 +/- 0.04 for the double mutant: G157A+G148A. At this pKa, the double mutant would remain completely closed under physiological conditions. In contrast, when the glycine at G148 was replaced by a proline, the pKa was shifted in the opposite direction from 6.6 +/- 0.01 (wild-type) to 5.7 +/- 0.01 for G148P. Although conserved glycines at G148 and G157 made it significantly easier to open the channel, they were not an absolute requirement for pH gating in Kir1.1. In addition, none of the glycine mutants produced more than small changes in either the cell-attached or excised single-channel kinetics which, in this channel, argues against changes in the selectivity filter. The putative pH sensor at K61-Kir1.1b, (equivalent to K80-Kir1.1a) was also examined. Mutation of this lysine to an untitratable methionine did not abolish pH gating, but shifted the pKa into an acid range from 6.6 +/- 0.01 to 5.4 +/- 0.04, similar to pH gating in Kir2.1. Hence K61-Kir1.1b cannot function as the exclusive pH sensor for the channel, although it may act as one of multiple pH sensors, or as a link between a cytoplasmic sensor and the channel gate. K61-Kir1.1b also interacted differently with the two glycine mutations. Gating of the double mutant: K61M+G148A was indistinguishable from K61M alone, whereas gating of K61M+G157A was midway between the alkaline pKa of G157A and the acid pKa of K61M. Finally, closure of ROMK, G148A, G157A, and K61M all required the same L160-Kir1.1b residue at the cytoplasmic end of the inner transmembrane helix. Hence in wild-type and mutant channels, closure occurs by steric occlusion of the permeation path by four leucine side chains (L160-Kir1.1b) at the helix bundle crossing. This is facilitated by the conserved glycines on TM2, but pH gating in Kir1.1 does not absolutely require glycine hinges in this region.     

Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels possess strong intrinsic inward rectification determined by a voltage-dependent K+-flux gating mechanism

Inwardly rectifying potassium (Kir) channels are broadly expressed in both excitable and nonexcitable tissues, where they contribute to a wide variety of cellular functions. Numerous studies have established that rectification of Kir channels is not an inherent property of the channel protein itself, but rather reflects strong voltage dependence of channel block by intracellular cations, such as polyamines and Mg²⁺. Here, we identify a previously unknown mechanism of inward rectification in Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels in the absence of these endogenous blockers. This novel intrinsic rectification originates from the voltage-dependent behavior of Kir4.1/Kir5.1, which is generated by the flux of potassium ions through the channel pore; the inward K⁺-flux induces the opening of the gate, whereas the outward flux is unable to maintain the gate open. This gating mechanism powered by the K⁺-flux is convergent with the gating of PIP₂ because, at a saturating concentration, PIP₂ greatly reduces the inward rectification. Our findings provide evidence of the coexistence of two rectification mechanisms in Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels: the classical inward rectification induced by blocking cations and an intrinsic voltage-dependent mechanism generated by the K⁺-flux gating.     

Characterization and Functional Restoration of a Potassium Channel Kir6.2 Pore Mutation Identified in Congenital Hyperinsulinism

The inwardly rectifying potassium channel Kir6.2 assembles with sulfonylurea receptor 1 to form the ATP-sensitive potassium (K_ATP) channels that regulate insulin secretion in pancreatic β-cells. Mutations in K_ATP channels underlie insulin secretion disease. Here, we report the characterization of a heterozygous missense Kir6.2 mutation, G156R, identified in congenital hyperinsulinism. Homomeric mutant channels reconstituted in COS cells show similar surface expression as wild-type channels but fail to conduct potassium currents. The mutated glycine is in the pore-lining transmembrane helix of Kir6.2; an equivalent glycine in other potassium channels has been proposed to serve as a hinge to allow helix bending during gating. We found that mutation of an adjacent asparagine, Asn-160, to aspartate, which converts the channel from a weak to a strong inward rectifier, on the G156R background restored ion conduction in the mutant channel. Unlike N160D channels, however, G156R/N160D channels are not blocked by intracellular polyamines at positive membrane potential and exhibit wild-type-like nucleotide sensitivities, suggesting the aspartate introduced at position 160 interacts with arginine at 156 to restore ion conduction and gating. Using tandem Kir6.2 tetramers containing G156R and/or N160D in designated positions, we show that one mutant subunit in the tetramer is insufficient to abolish conductance and that G156R and N160D can interact in the same or adjacent subunits to restore conduction. We conclude that the glycine at 156 is not essential for K_ATP channel gating and that the Kir6.2 gating defect caused by the G156R mutation could be rescued by manipulating chemical interactions between pore residues.     

Potassium Channel Gating in the Absence of the Highly Conserved Glycine of the Inner Transmembrane Helix

Potassium channel activation regulates cellular excitability, such as in neuronal and cardiac cells. Regulation of ion channel activity relies on a switching mechanism between two major conformations, the open and closed states, known as gating. It has been suggested that potassium channels are generally gated via a pivoted mechanism of the pore-lining helix (TM2) in the proximity of a glycine that is conserved in about 80% of potassium channels, even though about 20% of the channels lack a glycine at this position. Yet, as we show in G-protein gated potassium (Kir3) channels that lack a glycine at this position, the βγ subunits of G-proteins can still stimulate channel activity. Our results suggest that the effect of mutation of the central glycine (at position 175 in Kir3.4) on βγ-induced whole-cell currents is related to the extent of the interaction between residues located at the position of the central glycine and two residues, one located in the signature sequence of the selectivity filter (T149 in Kir3.4) and the other in the pore helix (E147 in Kir3.4). Our results also suggest that interactions with position 149 are more detrimental to channel function than interactions with position 147. The ability of Gβγ to overcome such restraining interactions is likely to depend on a combination of characteristics specific to each residue.     

Potassium channel gating in the absence of the highly conserved glycine of the inner transmembrane helix

Potassium channel activation regulates cellular excitability, such as in neuronal and cardiac cells. Regulation of ion channel activity relies on a switching mechanism between two major conformations, the open and closed states, known as gating. It has been suggested that potassium channels are generally gated via a pivoted mechanism the pore-lining helix (TM2) in the proximity of a glycine that is conserved in about 80% of potassium channels, even though about 20% of the channels lack a glycine at this position. Yet, as we show in G-protein gated potassium (Kir3) channels that lack a glycine at this position, the betagamma subunits of G-proteins can still stimulate channel activity. Our results suggest that the effect of mutation of the central glycine (at position 175 in Kir3.4) on betagamma-induced whole-cell currents is related to the extent of the interaction between residues located at the position of the central glycine and two residues, one located in the signature sequence of the selectivity filter (T149 in Kir3.4) and the other in the pore helix (E147 in Kir3.4). Our results also suggest that interactions with position 149 are more detrimental to channel function than interactions with position 147. The ability of Gbetagamma to overcome such restraining interactions is likely to depend on a combination of characteristics specific to each residue.     

Identification of domains that control the heteromeric assembly of Kir5.1/Kir4.0 potassium channels

Heteromultimerizationbetween different inwardly rectifying (Kir) potassium channel subunitsis an important mechanism for the generation of functional diversity.However, little is known about the mechanisms that control this processand that prevent promiscuous interactions in cells that express manydifferent Kir subunits. In this study, we have examined the heteromeric assembly of Kir5.1 with other Kir subunits and have shown that thissubunit exhibits a highly selective interaction with members of theKir4.0 subfamily and does not physically associate with other Kirsubunits such as Kir1.1, Kir2.1, and Kir6.2. Furthermore, we haveidentified regions within the Kir4.1 subunit that appear to govern thespecificity of this interaction. These results help us to understandthe mechanisms that control Kir subunit recognition and assembly andhow cells can express many different Kir channels while maintainingdistinct subpopulations of homo- and heteromeric channels within the cell.

     

Protein kinase C dependent inhibition of the heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channel

Heteromultimerization of Kir4.1 and Kir5.1 leads to a channel with distinct functional properties. The heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channel is expressed in the eye, kidney and brainstem and has CO₂/pH sensitivity in the physiological range, suggesting a candidate molecule for the regulation of K⁺ homeostasis and central CO₂ chemoreception. It is known that K⁺ transport in renal epithelium and brainstem CO₂ chemosensitivity are subject to modulation by hormones and neurotransmitters that activate distinct intracellular signaling pathways. If the Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channel is involved in pH-dependent regulation of cellular functions, it may also be regulated by some of the intracellular signaling systems. Therefore, we undertook studies to determine whether PKC modulates the heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channel. The channel expressed using a Kir4.1-Kir5.1 tandem dimer construct was inhibited by the PKC activator PMA in a dose-dependent manner. The channel inhibition was produced via reduction of the P_open. The effect of PMA was abolished by specific PKC inhibitors. In contrast, exposure of oocytes to forskolin (a PKA activator) had no significant effect on Kir4.1-Kir5.1 currents. The channel inhibition appeared to be independent of PIP₂ depletion and PKC-dependent internalization. Several consensus sequences of potential PKC phosphorylation sites were identified in the Kir4.1 and Kir5.1 subunits by sequence scan. Although the C-terminal peptides of both Kir4.1 and Kir5.1 were phosphorylated in vitro, site-directed mutagenesis of individual residues failed to reveal the PKC phosphorylation sites suggesting that the channel may have multiple phosphorylation sites. Taken together, these results suggest that the Kir4.1-Kir5.1 but not the homomeric Kir4.1 channel is strongly inhibited by PKC activation.     

Protein kinase C dependent inhibition of the heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channel

Heteromultimerization of Kir4.1 and Kir5.1 leads to a channel with distinct functional properties. The heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channel is expressed in the eye, kidney and brainstem and has CO(2)/pH sensitivity in the physiological range, suggesting a candidate molecule for the regulation of K(+) homeostasis and central CO(2) chemoreception. It is known that K(+) transport in renal epithelium and brainstem CO(2) chemosensitivity are subject to modulation by hormones and neurotransmitters that activate distinct intracellular signaling pathways. If the Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channel is involved in pH-dependent regulation of cellular functions, it may also be regulated by some of the intracellular signaling systems. Therefore, we undertook studies to determine whether PKC modulates the heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channel. The channel expressed using a Kir4.1-Kir5.1 tandem dimer construct was inhibited by the PKC activator PMA in a dose-dependent manner. The channel inhibition was produced via reduction of the P(open). The effect of PMA was abolished by specific PKC inhibitors. In contrast, exposure of oocytes to forskolin (a PKA activator) had no significant effect on Kir4.1-Kir5.1 currents. The channel inhibition appeared to be independent of PIP(2) depletion and PKC-dependent internalization. Several consensus sequences of potential PKC phosphorylation sites were identified in the Kir4.1 and Kir5.1 subunits by sequence scan. Although the C-terminal peptides of both Kir4.1 and Kir5.1 were phosphorylated in vitro, site-directed mutagenesis of individual residues failed to reveal the PKC phosphorylation sites suggesting that the channel may have multiple phosphorylation sites. Taken together, these results suggest that the Kir4.1-Kir5.1 but not the homomeric Kir4.1 channel is strongly inhibited by PKC activation.     

Decomposition of Slide Helix Contributions to ATP-dependent Inhibition of Kir6.2 Channels

Regulation of inwardly rectifying potassium channels by intracellular ligands couples cell membrane excitability to important signaling cascades and metabolic pathways. We investigated the molecular mechanisms that link ligand binding to the channel gate in ATP-sensitive Kir6.2 channels. In these channels, the “slide helix” forms an interface between the cytoplasmic (ligand-binding) domain and the transmembrane pore, and many slide helix mutations cause loss of function. Using a novel approach to rescue electrically silent channels, we decomposed the contribution of each interface residue to ATP-dependent gating. We demonstrate that effective inhibition by ATP relies on an essential aspartate at residue 58. Characterization of the functional importance of this conserved aspartate, relative to other residues in the slide helix, has been impossible because of loss-of-function of Asp-58 mutant channels. The Asp-58 position exhibits an extremely stringent requirement for aspartate because even a highly conservative mutation to glutamate is insufficient to restore normal channel function. These findings reveal unrecognized slide helix elements that are required for functional channel expression and control of Kir6.2 gating by intracellular ATP.     

Molecular Mechanisms of EAST/SeSAME Syndrome Mutations in Kir4.1 (KCNJ10)

Inwardly rectifying potassium channel Kir4.1 is critical for glial function, control of neuronal excitability, and systemic K⁺ homeostasis. Novel mutations in Kir4.1 have been associated with EAST/SeSAME syndrome, characterized by mental retardation, ataxia, seizures, hearing loss, and renal salt waste. Patients are homozygous for R65P, G77R, C140R or T164I; or compound heterozygous for A167V/R297C or R65P/R199Stop, a deletion of the C-terminal half of the protein. We investigated the functional significance of these mutations by radiotracer efflux and inside-out membrane patch clamping in COSm6 cells expressing homomeric Kir4.1 or heteromeric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels. All of the mutations compromised channel function, but the underlying mechanisms were different. R65P, T164I, and R297C caused an alkaline shift in pH sensitivity, indicating that these positions are crucial for pH sensing and pore gating. In R297C, this was due to disruption of intersubunit salt bridge Glu²⁸⁸–Arg²⁹⁷. C140R breaks the Cys¹⁰⁸–Cys¹⁴⁰ disulfide bond essential for protein folding and function. A167V did not affect channel properties but may contribute to decreased surface expression in A167V/R297C. In G77R, introduction of a positive charge within the bilayer may affect channel structure or gating. R199Stop led to a dramatic decrease in surface expression, but channel activity was restored by co-expression with intact subunits, suggesting remarkable tolerance for truncation of the cytoplasmic domain. These results provide an explanation for the molecular defects that underlie the EAST/SeSAME syndrome.