Tuning electron transfer by ester-group of chlorophylls in bacterial photosynthetic reaction center

Accessory chlorophylls (B(A/B)) in bacterial photosynthetic reaction center play a key role in charge-separation. Although light-exposed and dark-adapted bRC crystal structures are virtually identical, the calculated B(A) redox potentials for one-electron reduction differ. This can be traced back to different orientations of the B(A) ester-group. This tuning ability of chlorophyll redox potentials modulates the electron transfer from SP* to B(A).     

Redox potential of quinones in photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: dependence on protonation of Glu-L212 and Asp-L213

The absolute values of the one-electron redox potentials of the two quinones (Q(A) and Q(B)) in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides were calculated by evaluating the electrostatic energies from the solution of the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation at pH 7.0. The redox potential for Q(A) was calculated to be between -173 and -160 mV, which is close to the lowest measured values that are assumed to refer to nonequilibrated protonation patterns in the redox state Q(A)(-). The redox potential of quinone Q(B) is found to be about 160-220 mV larger for the light-exposed than for the dark-adapted structure. These values of the redox potentials are obtained if Asp-L213 is nearly protonated (probability 0.75-1.0) before and after electron transfer from Q(A) to Q(B), while Glu-L212 is partially protonated (probability 0.6) in the initial state Q(A)(-)Q(B)(0) and fully protonated in the final state Q(A)(0)Q(B)(-). Conversely, if the charge state of the quinones is varied from Q(A)(-)Q(B)(0) to Q(A)(0)Q(B)(-) corresponding to the electron transfer from Q(A) to Q(B), Asp-L213 remains protonated, while Glu-L212 changes its protonation state from 0.15 H(+) to fully protonated. In agreement with results from FTIR spectra, there is proton uptake at Glu-L212 going along with the electron transfer, whereas Asp-L213 does not change its protonation state. However, in our simulations Asp-L213 is considered to be protonated rather than ionized as deduced from FTIR spectra. The calculated redox potential of Q(A) shows little dependence on the charge state of Asp-L213, which is due to a strong coupling with the protonation state of Asp-M17 but increases by 50 mV if Glu-L212 changes from the ionized to the protonated charge state. Both are in agreement with fluorescence measurements observing the decay of SP(+)Q(A)(-) in a wide pH regime. The computed difference in redox potential of Q(B) in the light-exposed and dark-adapted structure was traced back to the hydrogen bond of Q(B) with His-L190 that is lost in the dark-adapted structure and the charge of the non-heme iron atom, which is closer to Q(B) in the light-exposed than in the dark-adapted structure.     

Electrostatic role of the non-heme iron complex in bacterial photosynthetic reaction center

To elucidate the role of the non-heme iron complex (Fe-complex) in the electron transfer (ET) events of bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers (bRC), we calculated redox potentials of primary/secondary quinones Q(A/B) (E(m)(Q(A/B))) in the Fe-depleted bRC. Removing the Fe-complex, the calculated E(m)(Q(A/B)) are downshifted by approximately 220 mV/ approximately 80 mV explaining both the 15-fold decrease in ET rate from bacteriopheophytin (H(A)(-)) to Q(A) and triplet state occurrence in Fe-depleted bRC. The larger downshift in E(m)(Q(A)) relative to E(m)(Q(B)) increases the driving-energy for ET from Q(A) to Q(B) by 140 meV, in agreement with approximately 100 meV increase derived from kinetic studies.     

Cu2+ site in photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, Rhodobacter capsulatus, and Rhodopseudomonas viridis

The interaction of metal ions with isolated photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) from the purple bacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides, Rhodobacter capsulatus, and Rhodopseudomonas viridis has been investigated with transient optical and magnetic resonance techniques. In RCs from all species, the electrochromic response of the bacteriopheophytin cofactors associated with Q(A)(-)Q(B) --> Q(A)Q(B)(-) electron transfer is slowed in the presence of Cu(2+). This slowing is similar to the metal ion effect observed for RCs from Rb. sphaeroides where Zn(2+) was bound to a specific site on the surface of the RC [Utschig et al. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 8278]. The coordination environments of the Cu(2+) sites were probed with electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, providing the first direct spectroscopic evidence for the existence of a second metal site in RCs from Rb. capsulatus and Rps. viridis. In the dark, RCs with Cu(2+) bound to the surface exhibit axially symmetric EPR spectra. Electron spin echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) spectral results indicate multiple weakly hyperfine coupled (14)N nuclei in close proximity to Cu(2+). These ESEEM spectra resemble those observed for Cu(2+) RCs from Rb. sphaeroides [Utschig et al. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 2961] and indicate that two or more histidines ligate the Cu(2+) at the surface site in each RC. Thus, RCs from Rb. sphaeroides, Rb. capsulatus, and Rps. viridis each have a structurally analogous Cu(2+) binding site that is involved in modulating the Q(A)(-)Q(B) --> Q(A)Q(B)(-) electron-transfer process. Inspection of the Rps. viridis crystal structure reveals four potential histidine ligands from three different subunits (M16, H178, H72, and L211) located beneath the Q(B) binding pocket. The location of these histidines is surprisingly similar to the grouping of four histidine residues (H68, H126, H128, and L211) observed in the Rb. sphaeroides RC crystal structure. Further elucidation of these Cu(2+) sites will provide a means to investigate localized proton entry into the RCs of Rb. capsulatus and Rps. viridis as well as locate a site of protein motions coupled with electron transfer.     

Energetics of proton transfer pathways in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. The Glu-H173 activated mutants

Electron transfer between the primary and secondary quinones (Q(A), Q(B)) in the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center (bRC) is coupled with proton uptake at Q(B). The protons are conducted from the cytoplasmic side, probably with the participation of two water channels. Mutations of titratable residues like Asp-L213 to Asn (inhibited mutant) or the double mutant Glu-L212 to Ala/Asp-L213 to Ala inhibit these electron transfer-coupled proton uptake events. The inhibition of the proton transfer (PT) process in the single mutant can be restored by a second mutation of Arg-M233 to Cys or Arg-H177 to His (revertant mutant). These revertant mutants shed light on the location of the main proton transfer pathway of wild type bRC. In contrast to the wild type and inhibited mutant bRC, the revertant mutant bRC showed notable proton uptake at Glu-H173 upon formation of the Q(B)- state. In all of these mutants, the pK(a) of Asp-M17 decreased by 1.4-2.4 units with respect to the wild type bRC, whereas a significant pK(a) upshift of up to 5.8 units was observed at Glu-H122, Asp-H170, Glu-H173, and Glu-H230 in the revertant mutants. These residues belonging to the main PT pathway are arranged along water channel P1 localized mainly in subunit H. bRC possesses subunit H, which has no counterpart in photosystem II. Thus, bRC may possess alternative PT pathways involving water channels in subunit H, which becomes active in case the main PT pathway is blocked.     

Redox potential of the non-heme iron complex in bacterial photosynthetic reaction center

In bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers (bRC), the electron is transferred from the special pair (P) via accessory bacteriochlorophyll (B(A)), bacteriopheopytin (H(A)), the primary quinone (Q(A)) to the secondary quinone (Q(B)). Although the non-heme iron complex (Fe complex) is located between Q(A) and Q(B), it was generally supposed not to be redox-active. Involvement of the Fe complex in electron transfer (ET) was proposed in recent FTIR studies [A. Remy and K. Gerwert, Coupling of light-induced electron transfer to proton uptake in photosynthesis, Nat. Struct. Biol. 10 (2003) 637-644]. However, other FTIR studies resulted in opposite results [J. Breton, Steady-state FTIR spectra of the photoreduction of Q(A) and Q(B) in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers provide evidence against the presence of a proposed transient electron acceptor X between the two quinones, Biochemistry 46 (2007) 4459-4465]. In this study, we calculated redox potentials of Q(A/B) (E(m)(Q(A/B))) and the Fe complex (E(m)(Fe)) based on crystal structure of the wild-type bRC (WT-bRC), and we investigated the energetics of the system where the Fe complex is assumed to be involved in the ET. E(m)(Fe) in WT-bRC is much less pH-dependent than that in PSII. In WT-bRC, we observed significant coupling of ET with Glu-L212 protonation upon oxidation of the Fe complex and a dramatic E(m)(Fe) downshift by 230 mV upon formation of Q(A)(-) (but not Q(B)(-)) due to the absence of proton uptake of Glu-L212. Changes in net charges of the His ligands of the Fe complex appear to be the nature of the redox event if we assume the involvement of the Fe complex in the ET.     

Absence of large-scale displacement of quinone QB in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers

Photosynthesis transforms light into chemical energy by coupling electron transfer to proton uptake at the quinone Q(B). The possibility of initiating this process with a brief pulse of light and the known X-ray structure makes the photosynthetic bacterial reaction center a paradigm for studying coupled electron-proton transfer in biology. It has been established that electron transfer from the primary quinone Q(A) to Q(B) is gated by a protein conformational change. On the basis of a dramatic difference in the location of Q(B) in structures derived from crystals cooled to 90 K either under illumination or in the dark, a functional model for the gating mechanism was proposed whereby neutral Q(B) moves 4.5 A before receiving the electron from Q(A)(-) [Stowell, M. H. B., McPhillips, T. M., Rees, D. C., Soltis, S. M., Abresch, E., and Feher, G. (1997) Science 276, 812-816]. Isotope-edited FTIR difference spectroscopy of Q(B) photoreduction at 290 and 85 K is used to investigate whether Q(B) moves upon reduction. We show that the specific interactions of the carbonyl groups of Q(B) and Q(B)(-) with the protein at a single binding site remain identical at both temperatures. Therefore, the different locations of Q(B) reported in many X-ray crystal structures probably are unrelated to functional electron transfer from Q(A)(-) to Q(B).     

-deltaG(AB) and pH dependence of the electron transfer from P(+)Q(A)(-)Q(B) toP(+)Q(A)Q(B)(-) in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers

The electron transfer from the reduced primary quinone (Q(A)(-)) to the secondary quinone (Q(B)) can occur in two phases with a well-characterized 100 micros component (tau(2)) and a faster process occurring in less than 10 micros (tau(1)). The fast reaction is clearly seen when the native ubiquinone-10 at Q(A) is replaced with naphthoquinones. The dependence of tau(1) on the free-energy difference between the P(+)Q(A)(-)Q(B) and P(+)Q(A)Q(B)(-) states (-) and on the pH was measured using naphthoquinones with different electrochemical midpoint potentials as Q(A) in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers (RCs) and in RCs where - is changed by mutation of M265 in the Q(A) site from Ile to Thr (M265IT). Q(B) was ubiquinone (UQ(B)) in all cases. Electron transfer was measured by using the absorption differences of the naphthosemiquinone at Q(A) and the ubisemiquinone at Q(B) between 390 and 500 nm. As - was changed from -90 to -250 meV tau(1) decreased from 29 to 0.2 micros. The free-energy dependence of tau(1) provides a reorganization energy of 850 +/- 100 meV for the electron transfer from Q(A)(-) to Q(B). The slower reaction at tau(2) is free-energy independent, so processes other than electron transfer determine the observed rate. The fraction of the reaction at tau(1) increases with increasing driving force and is 100% of the reaction when - is approximately 100 meV more favorable than in the native RCs with ubiquinone as Q(A). The fast phase, tau(1), is pH independent from pH 6 to 11 while tau(2) slows above pH 9. As the Q(A) isoprene tail length is increased from 2 to 10 isoprene units the fraction at tau(1) decreases. However, tau(1), tau(2), and the fraction of the reaction in each phase are independent of the tail length of UQ(B).     

Residual water modulates QA- -to-QB electron transfer in bacterial reaction centers embedded in trehalose amorphous matrices

The role of protein dynamics in the electron transfer from the reduced primary quinone, Q(A)(-), to the secondary quinone, Q(B), was studied at room temperature in isolated reaction centers (RC) from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides by incorporating the protein in trehalose water systems of different trehalose/water ratios. The effects of dehydration on the reaction kinetics were examined by analyzing charge recombination after different regimes of RC photoexcitation (single laser pulse, double flash, and continuous light) as well as by monitoring flash-induced electrochromic effects in the near infrared spectral region. Independent approaches show that dehydration of RC-containing matrices causes reversible, inhomogeneous inhibition of Q(A)(-)-to-Q(B) electron transfer, involving two subpopulations of RCs. In one of these populations (i.e., active), the electron transfer to Q(B) is slowed but still successfully competing with P(+)Q(A)(-) recombination, even in the driest samples; in the other (i.e., inactive), electron transfer to Q(B) after a laser pulse is hindered, inasmuch as only recombination of the P(+)Q(A)(-) state is observed. Small residual water variations ( approximately 7 wt %) modulate fully the relative fraction of the two populations, with the active one decreasing to zero in the driest samples. Analysis of charge recombination after continuous illumination indicates that, in the inactive subpopulation, the conformational changes that rate-limit electron transfer can be slowed by >4 orders of magnitude. The reported effects are consistent with conformational gating of the reaction and demonstrate that the conformational dynamics controlling electron transfer to Q(B) is strongly enslaved to the structure and dynamics of the surrounding medium. Comparing the effects of dehydration on P(+)Q(A)(-)-->PQ(A) recombination and Q(A)(-)Q(B)-->Q(A)Q(B)(-) electron transfer suggests that conformational changes gating the latter process are distinct from those stabilizing the primary charge-separated state.     

Trapping conformational intermediate states in the reaction center protein from photosynthetic bacteria

In protein, conformational changes are often crucial for function but not easy to observe. Two functionally relevant conformational intermediate states of photosynthetic reaction center protein (RCs) are trapped and characterized at low temperature. RCs frozen in the dark do not allow electron transfer from the reduced primary quinone, Q(A)(-), to the secondary quinone, Q(B). In contrast, RCs frozen under illumination in the product (P(+)Q(A)Q(B)(-)) state, with the oxidized electron donor, P(+), and reduced Q(B)(-), return to the ground state at cryogenic temperature in a conformation that allows a high yield of Q(B) reduction. Thus, RCs frozen under illumination are found to be trapped above the ground state in a conformation that allows product formation. When the temperature is raised above 120 K, the protein relaxes to an inactive conformation which is different from the RCs frozen in the dark. The activation energy for this change is 87 +/- 8 meV, and the active and inactive states differ in energy by only 16 +/- 3 meV. Thus, there are several conformational substates along the reaction coordinate with different transition temperatures. The ground state spectra of the RCs in active and inactive conformations report differences in the intraprotein electrostatic field, demonstrating that the dipole or charge distribution has changed. In addition, the electrochromic shift associated with the Q(A)(-) to Q(B) electron transfer at low temperature was characterized. The electron-transfer rate from Q(B)(-) to P(+) was measured at cryogenic temperature and is similar to the rate at room temperature, as expected for an exothermic, electron tunneling reaction in RCs.     

Histidine is involved in coupling proton uptake to electron transfer in photosynthetic proteins

In photosynthesis, the central step in transforming light energy into chemical energy is the coupling of light-induced electron transfer to proton uptake and release. Despite intense investigations of different photosynthetic protein complexes, including the photosystem II (PS II) in plants and the reaction center (RC) in bacteria, the molecular details of this fundamental process remain incompletely understood. In the RC of Rhodobacter (Rb.) sphaeroides, fast formation of the charge separated state, P(+)Q(A)(-), is followed by a slower electron transfer from the primary acceptor, Q(A), to the secondary acceptor, Q(B), and the uptake of a proton from the cytoplasm. The proton transfer to Q(B) takes place via a protonated water chain. Mutation of the amino acid AspL210 to Asn (L210DN mutant) near the entry of the proton pathway can disturb this water chain and consequently slow down proton uptake. Time-resolved step-scan Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) measurements revealed an intermediate X in the Q(A)(-)Q(B) to Q(A)Q(B)(-) transition. The nature of this transition remains a matter of debate. In this study, we investigated the role of the iron-histidine complex located between Q(A) and Q(B). We used time-resolved fast-scan FTIR spectroscopy to characterize the Rb. sphaeroides L210DN RC mutant marked with isotopically labeled histidine. FTIR marker bands of the intermediate X between 1120 cm(-1) and 1050 cm(-1) are assigned to histidine vibrations and indicate the protonation of a histidine, most likely HisL190, during the disappearance of the intermediate. Based on these results we propose a novel mechanism of the coupling of electron and proton transfer in photosynthesis.     

Low-temperature interquinone electron transfer in photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Blastochloris viridis: characterization of Q(B)- states by high-frequency electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and electron-nuclear double resonance (ENDOR)

High-frequency electron paramagnetic resonance (HF EPR) techniques have been employed to look for localized light-induced conformational changes in the protein environments around the reduced secondary quinone acceptor (Q(B)(-)) in Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Blastochloris viridis RCs. The Q(A)(-) and Q(B)(-) radical species in Fe-removed/Zn-replaced protonated RCs substituted with deuterated quinones are distinguishable with pulsed D-band (130 GHz) EPR and provide native probes of both the low-temperature Q(A)(-)Q(B) --> Q(A)Q(B)(-) electron-transfer event and the structure of trapped conformational substates. We report here the first spectroscopic evidence that cryogenically trapped, light-induced changes enable low-temperature Q(A)(-)Q(B) --> Q(A)Q(B)(-) electron transfer in the B. viridis RC and the first observation of an inactive, trapped P(+)Q(B)(-) state in both R. sphaeroides and B. viridis RCs that does not recombine at 20 K. The high resolution and orientational selectivity of HF electron-nuclear double resonance (ENDOR) allows us to directly probe protein environments around Q(B)(-) for distinct P(+)Q(B)(-) kinetic RC states by spectrally selecting specific nuclei in isotopically labeled samples. No structural differences in the protein structure near Q(B)(-) or reorientation (within 5 degrees ) of Q(B)(-) was observed with HF ENDOR spectra of two states of P(+)Q(B)(-): "active" and "inactive" states with regards to low-temperature electron transfer. These results reveal a remarkably enforced local protein environment for Q(B) in its reduced semiquinone state and suggest that the conformational change that controls reactivity resides beyond the Q(B) local environment.     

Monomeric bacteriochlorophyll is required for the triplet energy transfer between the primary donor and the carotenoid in photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers

Reaction centers from the carotenoidless mutant Rb. sphaeroides R26 were treated with sodium borohydride which is known to remove one of the accessory monomeric bacteriochlorophylls (BB). Subsequently, the carotenoid, spheroidene, was incorporated into the modified reaction centers. It is demonstrated by optical absorption and circular dichroism experiments that spheroidene, reconstituted into the sodium borohydride-treated Rb. sphaeroides R26 reaction centers, is bound in a single site, in the same environment and with the same structure as spheroidene reconstituted into untreated (native) Rb. sphaeroides R26 reaction centers. Transient optical and electron spin resonance spectroscopic data indicate that unless the accessory BB is present, the primary donor-to-carotenoid triplet energy transfer reaction is inhibited. These observations provide direct evidence for the involvement of the accessory BB in the triplet energy transfer pathway.     

Fourier transform infrared evidence of proton uptake by glutamate L212 upon reduction of the secondary quinone QB in the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter capsulatus

The photoreduction of the secondary quinone Q(B) in native reaction centers (RCs) of Rhodobacter capsulatus and in RCs from the GluL212 --> Gln and GluL212 --> Ala mutants has been investigated at pH 7 in (1)H(2)O and (2)H(2)O by light-induced Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) difference spectroscopy. The Q(B)(-)/Q(B) FTIR difference spectra reflect changes of quinone-protein interactions and of protonation state of carboxylic acid groups as well as reorganization of the protein upon electron transfer. Comparison of Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectra of native and mutant RCs indicates that the interactions between Q(B) or Q(B)(-) and the protein are similar in all RCs. A differential signal at approximately 1650/1640 cm(-1), which is common to all the spectra, is associated with a movement of a peptide carbonyl or a side chain following Q(B) reduction. On the other hand, Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectra of native and mutant RCs display several differences, notably between 1700 and 1650 cm(-1) (amide I and side chains), between 1570 and 1530 cm(-1) (amide II), and at 1728-1730 cm(-1) (protonated carboxylic acid groups). In particular, the latter region in native RCs is characterized by a main positive band at 1728 cm(-1) and a negative signal at 1739 cm(-1). In the L212 mutants, the amplitude of the positive band is strongly decreased leading to a differential signal at 1739/1730 cm(-1) that is insensitive to (1)H/(2)H isotopic exchange. In native RCs, only the 1728 cm(-1) band is affected in (2)H(2)O while the 1739 cm(-1) signal is not. The effects of the mutations and of (1)H/(2)H exchange on the Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectra concur in the attribution of the 1728 cm(-1) band in native RCs to (partial) proton uptake by GluL212 upon the first electron transfer to Q(B), as previously observed in Rhodobacter sphaeroides RCs [Nabedryk, E., Breton, J., Hienerwadel, R., Fogel, C., M?ntele, W., Paddock, M. L., and Okamura, M. Y. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 14722-14732]. More generally, strong homologies of the Q(B) to Q(B)(-) transition in the RCs from Rb. sphaeroides and Rb. capsulatus are detected by differential FTIR spectroscopy. The FTIR data are discussed in relation with the results from global proton uptake measurements and electrogenic events concomitant with the reduction of Q(B) and with a model of the Q(B) turnover in Rb. sphaeroides RCs [Mulkidjanian, A. Y. (1999) FEBS Lett. 463, 199-204].     

Electron transfer in reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. I. Determination of the charge recombination pathway of D+QAQ(-)B and free energy and kinetic relations between Q(-)AQB and QAQ(-)B

The electron-transfer reactions and thermodynamic equilibria involving the quinone acceptor complex in bacterial reaction centers from R. sphaeroides were investigated. The reactions are described by the scheme: (Formula: see text). We found that the charge recombination pathway of D+QAQ(-)B proceeds via the intermediate state D+Q(-)AQB, the direct pathway contributing less than approx. 5% to the observed recombination rate. The method used to obtain this result was based on a comparison of the kinetics predicted for the indirect pathway (given by the product kAD-times the fraction of reaction centers in the Q-AQB state) with the observed recombination rate, kobsD+----D. The kinetic measurements were used to obtain the pH dependence (6.1 smaller than or equal to pH smaller than or equal to 11.7) of the free energy difference between the states Q(-)AQB and QAQ(-)B. At low pH (less than 9) QAQ(-)B is stabilized relative to Q(-)AQB by 67 meV, whereas at high pH Q(-)AQB is energetically favored. Both Q(-)A and Q(-)B associate with a proton, with pK values of 9.8 and 11.3, respectively. The stronger interaction of the proton with Q(-)B provides the driving force for the forward electron transfer.     

Conformational regulation of charge recombination reactions in a photosynthetic bacterial reaction center

In bright light the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides stabilizes the P(+)(870).Q(-)(A) charge-separated state and thereby minimizes the potentially harmful effects of light saturation. Using X-ray diffraction we report a conformational change that occurs within the cytoplasmic domain of this RC in response to prolonged illumination with bright light. Our observations suggest a novel structural mechanism for the regulation of electron transfer reactions in photosynthesis.     

A time-resolved iron-specific X-ray absorption experiment yields no evidence for an Fe2+ --> Fe3+ transition during QA- --> QB electron transfer in the photosynthetic reaction center

Previous time-resolved FTIR measurements suggested the involvement of an intermediary component in the electron transfer step Q(A)- --> Q(B) in the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides [Remy and Gerwert (2003) Nat. Struct. Biol. 10, 637]. By a kinetic X-ray absorption experiment at the Fe K-edge we investigated whether oxidation occurs at the ferric non-heme iron located between the two quinones. In isolated reaction centers with a high content of functional Q(B), at a time resolution of 30 micros and at room temperature, no evidence for transient oxidation of Fe was obtained. However, small X-ray transients occurred, in a similar micro- to millisecond time range as in the IR experiments, which may point to changes in the Fe ligand environment due to the charges on Q(A)- and Q(B)-. In addition, VIS measurements agree with the IR data and do not exclude an intermediate in the Q(A)- --> Q(B) transition.     

Probing light-induced conformational transitions in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers embedded in trehalose-water amorphous matrices

The coupling between electron transfer and protein dynamics has been studied in photosynthetic reaction centers (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides by embedding the protein into room temperature solid trehalose-water matrices. Electron transfer kinetics from the primary quinone acceptor (Q(A)(-)) to the photoxidized donor (P(+)) were measured as a function of the duration of photoexcitation from 20 ns (laser flash) to more than 1 min. Decreasing the water content of the matrix down to approximately 5x10(3) water molecules per RC causes a reversible four-times acceleration of P(+)Q(A)(-) recombination after the laser pulse. By comparing the broadly distributed kinetics observed under these conditions with the ones measured in glycerol-water mixtures at cryogenic temperatures, we conclude that RC relaxation from the dark-adapted to the light-adapted state and thermal fluctuations among conformational substates are hindered in the room temperature matrix over the time scale of tens of milliseconds. When the duration of photoexcitation is increased from a few milliseconds to the second time scale, recombination kinetics of P(+)Q(A)(-) slows down progressively and becomes less distributed, indicating that even in the driest matrices, during continuous illumination, the RC is gaining a limited conformational freedom that results in partial stabilization of P(+)Q(A)(-). This behavior is consistent with a tight structural and dynamical coupling between the protein surface and the trehalose-water matrix.