X-chromosome inactivation in XX androgenetic mouse embryos surviving implantation

Using genetic and cytogenetic markers, we assessed early development and X-chromosome inactivation (X-inactivation) in XX mouse androgenones produced by pronuclear transfer. Contrary to the current view, XX androgenones are capable of surviving to embryonic day 7.5, achieving basically random X-inactivation in all tissues including those derived from the trophectoderm and primitive endoderm that are characterized by paternal X-activation in fertilized embryos. This finding supports the hypothesis that in fertilized female embryos, the maternal X chromosome remains active until the blastocyst stage because of a rigid imprint that prevents inactivation, whereas the paternal X chromosome is preferentially inactivated in extra-embryonic tissues owing to lack of such imprint. In spite of random X-inactivation in XX androgenones, FISH analyses revealed expression of stable Xist RNA from every X chromosome in XX and XY androgenonetic embryos from the four-cell to morula stage. Although the occurrence of inappropriate X-inactivation was further suggested by the finding that Xist continues ectopic expression in a proportion of cells from XX and XY androgenones at the blastocyst and the early egg cylinder stage, a replication banding study failed to provide positive evidence for inappropriate X-inactivation at E6. 5.     

Fifty years of X-inactivation research

The third X-inactivation meeting 'Fifty years of X-inactivation research', which celebrated the fiftieth anniversary of Mary Lyon's formulation of the X-inactivation hypothesis, was an EMBO workshop held in Oxford, UK, in July 2011. This conference brought together the usual suspects from the field, as well as younger researchers, to discuss recent advances in X-inactivation research. Here, we review the results presented at the meeting and highlight some of the exciting progress that has been made. We also discuss the future challenges for the field, which aim to further our understanding of the developmental regulation of X inactivation, the randomness (or skewing) of X inactivation, and the diverse strategies used by mammalian species to mediate X inactivation.     

Commitment to X inactivation precedes the twinning event in monochorionic MZ twins.

To gain insight into the timing of twinning, we have examined a closely related event, X-chromosome inactivation, in female MZ twin pairs. X-inactivation patterns in peripheral blood and buccal mucosa were compared between monochorionic MZ (MC-MZ) and dichorionic MZ (DC-MZ) twins. Overall, the MC-MZ twins displayed highly similar X-inactivation patterns, whereas DC-MZ twins frequently differed in their X-inactivation patterns, when both tissues were tested. Previous experimental data suggest that commitment to X inactivation occurs when there are 10-20 cells in the embryo. Simulation of embryo splitting after commitment to X inactivation suggests that MC-MZ twinning occurs three or four rounds of replication after X inactivation, whereas a DC-MZ twinning event occurs earlier, before or around the time of X inactivation. Finally, the overall degree of skewing in the MZ twins was not significantly different from that observed in singletons. This indicates that X inactivation does not play a direct role in the twinning process, and it further suggests that extreme unequal splitting is not a common mechanism of twin formation.     

X chromosome inactivation,differentiation, and DNA methylation revisited,with a tribute to Susumu Ohno

X chromosome inactivation and DNA methylation are reviewed, with emphasis on the contributions of Susumu Ohno and the predictions made in my 1975 paper (Riggs, 1975), in which I proposed the "maintenance methylase" model for somatic inheritance of methylation patterns and suggested that DNA methylation would be involved in mammalian X chromosome inactivation and development. The maintenance methylase model is discussed and updated to consider methylation patterns in cell populations that have occasional, stochastic methylation changes by de novo methylation or demethylation, either active or passive. The "way station" model for the spread of X inactivation by LINE-1 elements is also considered, and some recent results from my laboratory are briefly reviewed.     

Heterochromatin DNA replication and Rif1

Constitutive heterochromatin is essential for chromosome maintenance in all eukaryotes. However, the repetitive nature of the underlying DNA, the presence of very stable protein-DNA complexes and the highly compacted nature of this type of chromatin represent a challenge for the DNA replication machinery. Data collected from different model organisms suggest that at least some of the components of the DNA replication checkpoint could be essential for ensuring the completion of DNA replication in the context of heterochromatin. I review and discuss the literature that directly or indirectly contributes to the formulation of this hypothesis. In particular, I focus my attention on Rif1, a newly discovered member of the DNA replication checkpoint. Recent data generated in mammalian cells highlight the spatial and temporal relation between Rif1, pericentromeric heterochromatin and S-phase. I review these recent and the previous data coming from studies performed in yeast in order to highlight the possible evolutionary conserved links and propose a molecular model for Rif1 role in heterochromatin replication.     

Structural heterochromatin and X-chromosome inactivation]

Our previous studies on the expression of the G6PD and alpha-GAL genes from the X chromosome of inter-specific hybrids of voles of the Microtus genus have demonstrated an unusual pattern of X-inactivation in the parents. The observed phenomenon was explained as the presumable result of nonrandom inactivation of the X chromosomes with a heterochromatin block in crosses involving Microtus arvalis whose X lacks a heterochromatin region and also of random X inactivation when both parents had heterochromatin blocks on the Xs. Based on known models, we discuss here the possible mechanisms of the effect of heterochromatin on X-inactivation; we give preference to the model postulating binding of nonhistone protein to the inactivation centre as the key event. The hypothesis we offer suggests change in chromatin conformation in the inactivation centre during packaging of heterochromatic region of a chromosome; the protein molecules diffusing along the chromosome towards the heterochromatin region by the "facilitated diffusion" mechanism may happen to be in the region of the X-inactivation centre, which, being in a favorable state, binds specifically to it; as a consequence, the binding probability of protein to heterochromatin increases as compared to chromosome without heterochromatin block.     

Height discordance in monozygotic females is not attributable to discordant inactivation of X-linked stature determining genes.

We tested the hypothesis that X-linked genes determining stature which are subject to skewed or non-random X-inactivation can account for discordance in height in monozygotic female twins. Height discordant female monozygotic adult twins (20 pairs) were identified from the Australian Twin Registry, employing the selection criteria of proven monozygosity and a measured height discordance of at least 5 cm. Differential X-inactivation was examined in genomic DNA extracted from peripheral lymphocytes by estimating differential methylation of alleles at the polymorphic CAG triplet repeat of the Androgen receptor gene (XAR). There were 17/20 MZ pairs heterozygous at this locus and informative for analysis. Of these, 10/17 both had random X-inactivation, 5/17 showed identical X-inactivation patterns of non random inactivation and 2/17 (12%) showed discordant X-inactivation. There was no relationship between inactivation patterns and self-report chorionicity. We conclude that non-random X-inactivation does not appear to be a major contributor to intra-pair height discordance in female MZ twins.     

Mary Lyon and the hypothesis of random X chromosome inactivation

The 50th anniversary of Mary Lyon’s 1961 Nature paper, proposing random inactivation in early embryonic life of one of the two X chromosomes in the cells of mammalian females, provides an opportunity to remember and celebrate the work of those involved. While the hypothesis was initially put forward by Lyon based on findings in the mouse, it was founded on earlier studies, notably the work of Susumu Ohno; it was also suggested independently by Beutler and colleagues using experimental evidence from a human X-linked disorder, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, and has proved to be of as great importance for human and medical genetics as it has for general mammalian genetics. Alongside the hypothesis itself, previous cytological studies of mouse and human chromosomes, and the observations on X-linked mutants in both species deserve recognition for their essential role in underpinning the hypothesis of random X-inactivation, while subsequent research on the X-inactivation centre and the molecular mechanisms underlying the inactivation process represent some of the most outstanding contributions to human and wider mammalian genetics over the past 50 years.     

The two ages of the RNA world, and the transition to the DNA world: a story of viruses and cells

Most evolutionists agree to consider that our present RNA/DNA/protein world has originated from a simpler world in which RNA played both the role of catalyst and genetic material. Recent findings from structural studies and comparative genomics now allow to get a clearer picture of this transition. These data suggest that evolution occurred in several steps, first from an RNA to an RNA/protein world (defining two ages of the RNA world) and finally to the present world based on DNA. The DNA world itself probably originated in two steps, first the U-DNA world, following the invention of ribonucleotide reductase, and later on the T-DNA world, with the independent invention of at least two thymidylate synthases. Recently, several authors have suggested that evolution from the RNA world up to the Last Universal Cellular Ancestor (LUCA) could have occurred before the invention of cells. On the contrary, I argue here that evolution of the RNA world taken place in a framework of competing cells and viruses (preys, predators and symbionts). I focus on the RNA-to-DNA transition and expand my previous hypothesis that viruses played a critical role in the emergence of DNA. The hypothesis that DNA and associated mechanisms (replication, repair, recombination) first evolved and diversified in a world of DNA viruses infecting RNA cells readily explains the existence of viral-encoded DNA transaction proteins without cellular homologues. It also potentially explains puzzling observations from comparative genomic, such as the existence of two non-homologous DNA replication machineries in the cellular world. I suggest here a specific scenario for the transfer of DNA from viruses to cells and briefly explore the intriguing possibility that several independent transfers of this kind produced the two cell types (prokaryote/eukaryote) and the three cellular domains presently known (Archaea, Bacteria and Eukarya).     

Distribution of LINEs and other repetitive elements in the karyotype of the bat Carollia: implications for X-chromosome inactivation

The Lyon repeat hypothesis postulates that long interspersed elements (LINEs) play a role in X-chromosome inactivation. Evidence to support this hypothesis includes the observation that the degree of inactivation of autosomes translocated to the X chromosome is correlated with LINE density on that autosome. We examined the distribution of LINEs in the fruit bat Carollia brevicauda, which has an autosomal translocation to the X that occurred at least 7 million years ago. A quantitative analysis of LINE accumulation on multiple metaphase chromosome spreads revealed a significant accumulation on the original X relative to the attached autosome, the homolog of that autosome (Y(2)), and chromosome 1. Previous replication studies indicate that for the X and attached autosome, only the original X chromosome replicates late in Carollia females, and that the attached autosome replicates in the same timeframe as other autosomes. These data are compatible with the Lyon repeat hypothesis, and the possibility that LINEs act as booster elements for X inactivation remains a viable hypothesis. We address the procedures and limitations of quantitative analysis based on in situ hybridization.     

DNA methylation and late replication probably aid cell memory, and type I DNA reeling could aid chromosome folding and enhancer function

DNA methylation in mammals is reviewed, and it is concluded that one role of methylation is to aid cell memory, which is defined as the ability of mitotically derived progeny cells to remember and re-establish their proper cellular identity. Methylation of X-linked CpG-rich islands probably stabilizes X-chromosome inactivation, but other mechanisms appear to be involved. Late replication is discussed as a key ancestral mechanism for X inactivation, and it is emphasized that early and late replication domains may each be self perpetuating. Therefore, early-late replication timing becomes another strong candidate mechanism for cell memory. A chromosome-loop folding enigma is discussed, and it is concluded that special mechanisms are needed to explain the formation and maintenance of specific looped domains. DNA reeling, such as done by type I restriction-modification enzymes, is proposed to provide this special mechanism for folding. DNA reeling mechanisms can help to explain the cis-spreading of X-chromosome inactivation as well as long-range action by enhancers.     

A new assay for the analysis of X-chromosome inactivation based on methylation-specific PCR

The pattern of X-chromosome inactivation in females is currently evaluated by assays of differential methylation in the genes between the active and the inactive X chromosomes, with methylation-sensitive enzymes. We report a new assay in the human androgen receptor (HUMARA) locus involving a methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) technique, independent of the use of restriction enzymes. The assay involves the chemical modification of DNA with sodium bisulfite and subsequent PCR. By using the assay with specific primers for the methylated allele, we obtained an X-inactivation pattern based on the ratio of the maternal inactive X to the paternal inactive X. These patterns were consistent with those obtained by conventional PCR assay at the same locus in 48 female cases. We also obtained another X-inactivation pattern based on the ratio of the maternal active X to the paternal active X by using specific primers for the unmethylated allele. The latter pattern was complementary to the former pattern, and a combination of these patterns produced a reliable X-inactivation pattern. The assay revealed that 12 (11%) of the 105 normal females had non-random inactivation patterns (>80:20 or <20:80). Four patients with an X; autosome translocation showed extremely non-random patterns, and these results were consistent with those obtained by previous molecular/cytogenetic studies. We conclude that M-PCR provides an accurate assay for X-inactivation and that it can be performed on various DNA samples unsuitable for restriction digestion. Received: 3 September 1998 / Accepted: 10 October 1998     

Studies of the temporal relationship between the cytogenetic and biochemical manifestations of X-chromosome inactivation during the differentiation of LT-1 teratocarcinoma stem cells

Previous biochemical studies have suggested that both X chromosomes produce gene products when cells of the LT-1 teratocarcinoma stem cell line are maintained in the undifferentiated state, and that dosage compensation, the biochemical manifestation of X inactivation, occurs when the cells are induced to differentiate in vitro (Martin et al., 1978). In this study the differentiation of LT-1 cells in vitro is described in detail, and data from cytogenetic studies of the time of X-chromosome replication in LT-1 cells are presented. They show that as long as the cells are maintained in the undifferentiated state both X chromosomes in each cell show the isocyclic replication pattern typical of a genetically active chromosome. However, when the LT-1 cells are induced to differentiate under appropriate conditions, one of the two X chromosomes in each cell of a large proportion of the population displays the allocyclic (either early or late) replication pattern typical of an inactive X chromosome. These data thus confirm that undifferentiated LT-1 cells contain two active X chromosomes and that X inactivation occurs in differentiating cultures of LT-1 cells. It is further demonstrated that there is a close temporal correlation between the biochemical and cytogenetic manifestations of the X-inactivation process. In addition, we observed that although X inactivation does not occur in the absence of morphological differentiation, it does not always occur when the cells differentiate in vitro.     

Micromanipulating dosage compensation: understanding X-chromosome inactivation through nuclear transplantation

Nuclear transfer (NT) studies have provided insight into the functional importance of epigenetic alteration of the X chromosomes during X-inactivation. Uniparental embryos created by NT have been informative as to the time and location at which the imprint controlling extraembryonic X-inactivation is established. Experiments with female somatic cells, have demonstrated that the inactive X chromosome (Xi) is reactivated after NT, leading to random X-inactivation in the embryonic lineages of cloned embryos. However, in the extraembryonic lineages of clones, epigenetic information from the donor cell nucleus persists, leading to preferential inactivation of the donor cell's inactive X in the placenta of cloned animals. These results suggest epigenetic information established during embryonic X-inactivation is functionally equivalent to the gametic imprint.     

Pigmentary mosaicism in hypomelanosis of Ito

We report on a female with mental and motor retardation, facial dysmorphism, abnormal pigmentation reminiscent to hypomelanosis of Ito (HI), and karyotypic mosaicism involving a small supernumerary marker chromosome. The marker chromosome was defined by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) as a ring X chromosome with breakpoints in the juxtacentromeric region. FISH analysis showed that the ring does not include the XIST locus at the X-inactivation centre and, therefore, may not be subject to X inactivation. X-inactivation studies with the HUMARA (human androgen receptor) and FMR1 assay showed a skewed X-inactivation pattern (85:15) with preferential inactivation of the paternal X chromosome. These results are discussed with respect to the role of functional disomy of Xp in the pathogenesis of HI. Received: 16 February 1998 / Accepted: 17 July 1998