Neuropeptide modulation of microcircuits

Neuropeptides provide functional flexibility to microcircuits, their inputs and effectors by modulating presynaptic and postsynaptic properties and intrinsic currents. Recent studies have relied less on applied neuropeptide and more on their neural release. In rhythmically active microcircuits (central pattern generators, CPGs), recent studies show that neuropeptide modulation can enable particular activity patterns by organizing specific circuit motifs. Neuropeptides can also modify microcircuit output indirectly, by modulating circuit inputs. Recently elucidated consequences of neuropeptide modulation include changes in motor patterns and behavior, stabilization of rhythmic motor patterns and changes in CPG sensitivity to sensory input. One aspect of neuropeptide modulation that remains enigmatic is the presence of multiple peptide family members in the same nervous system and even the same neurons.     

Central pattern generators and the control of rhythmic movements.

Central pattern generators are neuronal circuits that when activated can produce rhythmic motor patterns such as walking, breathing, flying, and swimming in the absence of sensory or descending inputs that carry specific timing information. General principles of the organization of these circuits and their control by higher brain centers have come from the study of smaller circuits found in invertebrates. Recent work on vertebrates highlights the importance of neuro-modulatory control pathways in enabling spinal cord and brain stem circuits to generate meaningful motor patterns. Because rhythmic motor patterns are easily quantified and studied, central pattern generators will provide important testing grounds for understanding the effects of numerous genetic mutations on behavior. Moreover, further understanding of the modulation of spinal cord circuitry used in rhythmic behaviors should facilitate the development of new treatments to enhance recovery after spinal cord damage.     

A mathematical model of adaptive behavior in quadruped locomotion

Locomotion involves repetitive movements and is often executed unconsciously and automatically. In order to achieve smooth locomotion, the coordination of the rhythms of all physical parts is important. Neurophysiological studies have revealed that basic rhythms are produced in the spinal network called, the central pattern generator (CPG), where some neural oscillators interact to self-organize coordinated rhythms. We present a model of the adaptation of locomotion patterns to a variable environment, and attempt to elucidate how the dynamics of locomotion pattern generation are adjusted by the environmental changes. Recent experimental results indicate that decerebrate cats have the ability to learn new gait patterns in a changed environment. In those experiments, a decerebrate cat was set on a treadmill consisting of three moving belts. This treadmill provides a periodic perturbation to each limb through variation of the speed of each belt. When the belt for the left forelimb is quickened, the decerebrate cat initially loses interlimb coordination and stability, but gradually recovers them and finally walks with a new gait. Based on the above biological facts, we propose a CPG model whose rhythmic pattern adapts to periodic perturbation from the variable environment. First, we design the oscillator interactions to generate a desired rhythmic pattern. In our model, oscillator interactions are regarded as the forces that generate the desired motion pattern. If the desired pattern has already been realized, then the interactions are equal to zero. However, this rhythmic pattern is not reproducible when there is an environmental change. Also, if we do not adjust the rhythmic dynamics, the oscillator interactions will not be zero. Therefore, in our adaptation rule, we adjust the memorized rhythmic pattern so as to minimize the oscillator interactions. This rule can describe the adaptive behavior of decerebrate cats well. Finally, we propose a mathematical framework of an adaptation in rhythmic motion. Our framework consists of three types of dynamics: environmental, rhythmic motion, and adaptation dynamics. We conclude that the time scale of adaptation dynamics should be much larger than that of rhythmic motion dynamics, and the repetition of rhythmic motions in a stable environment is important for the convergence of adaptation. Received: 10 July 1997 / Accepted in revised form: 13 March 1998     

Experiments on the central pattern generator for swimming in amphibian embryos

The central nervous system of paralysed Xenopus laevis embryos can generate a motor output pattern suitable for swimming locomotion. By recording motor root activity in paralysed embryos with transected nervous systems we have shown that: (a) the spinal cord is capable of swimming pattern generation; (b) swimming pattern generator capability in the hindbrain and spinal cord is distributed; (c) caudal hindbrain is necessary for sustained swimming output after discrete stimulation. By recording similarly from embryos whose central nervous system was divided longitudinally into left and right sides, we have shown that: (a) each side can generate rhythmic motor output with cycle periods like those in swimming; (b) during this activity cycle period increases within an episode, and there is the usual rostrocaudal delay found in swimming; (c) this activity is influenced by sensory stimuli in the same way as swimming activity; (d) normal phase coupling of the left and right sides can be established by the ventral commissure in the spinal cord. We conclude that interactions between the antagonistic (left and right) motor systems are not necessary for swimming rhythm generation and present a model for swimming pattern generation where autonomous rhythm generators on each side of the nervous system drive the motoneurons. Alternation is achieved by reciprocal inhibition, and activity is initiated and maintained by tonic excitation from the hindbrain.     

Neuromodulation for behavior in the locust frontal ganglion

Neuromodulators orchestrate complex behavioral routines by their multiple and combined effects on the nervous system. In the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria, frontal ganglion neurons innervate foregut dilator muscles and play a key role in the control of foregut motor patterns. To further investigate the role of the frontal ganglion in locust behavior, we currently focus on the frontal ganglion central pattern generator as a target for neuromodulation. Application of octopamine, a well-studied insect neuromodulator, generated reversible disruption of frontal ganglion rhythmic activity. The threshold for the modulatory effects of octopamine was 10^–6 mol l^–1, and 10^–4 mol l^–1 always abolished the ongoing rhythm. In contrast to this straightforward modulation, allatostatin, previously reported to be a myoinhibitor of insect gut muscles, showed complex, tri-modal, dose-dependent effects on frontal ganglion rhythmic pattern. Using a novel cross-correlation analysis technique, we show that different allatostatin concentrations have very different effects not only on cycle period but also on temporal characteristics of the rhythmic bursts of action potentials. Allatostatin also altered the frontal ganglion rhythm in vivo. The analysis technique we introduce may be instrumental in the study of not fully characterized neural circuits and their modulation. The physiological significance of our results and the role of the modulators in locust behavior are discussed.Abbreviation CPG central pattern generator - FG frontal ganglion - JH juvenile hormone - STNS stomatogastric nervous system     

Kinematics of the Coordination of Pointing during Locomotion

In natural motor behaviour arm movements, such as pointing or reaching, often need to be coordinated with locomotion. The underlying coordination patterns are largely unexplored, and require the integration of both rhythmic and discrete movement primitives. For the systematic and controlled study of such coordination patterns we have developed a paradigm that combines locomotion on a treadmill with time-controlled pointing to targets in the three-dimensional space, exploiting a virtual reality setup. Participants had to walk at a constant velocity on a treadmill. Synchronized with specific foot events, visual target stimuli were presented that appeared at different spatial locations in front of them. Participants were asked to reach these stimuli within a short time interval after a “go” signal. We analysed the variability patterns of the most relevant joint angles, as well as the time coupling between the time of pointing and different critical timing events in the foot movements. In addition, we applied a new technique for the extraction of movement primitives from kinematic data based on anechoic demixing. We found a modification of the walking pattern as consequence of the arm movement, as well as a modulation of the duration of the reaching movement in dependence of specific foot events. The extraction of kinematic movement primitives from the joint angle trajectories exploiting the new algorithm revealed the existence of two distinct main components accounting, respectively, for the rhythmic and discrete components of the coordinated movement pattern. Summarizing, our study shows a reciprocal pattern of influences between the coordination patterns of reaching and walking. This pattern might be explained by the dynamic interactions between central pattern generators that initiate rhythmic and discrete movements of the lower and upper limbs, and biomechanical factors such as the dynamic gait stability.     

Partly shared spinal cord networks for locomotion and scratching

Animals produce a variety of behaviors using a limited number of muscles and motor neurons. Rhythmic behaviors are often generated in basic form by networks of neurons within the central nervous system, or central pattern generators (CPGs). It is known from several invertebrates that different rhythmic behaviors involving the same muscles and motor neurons can be generated by a single CPG, multiple separate CPGs, or partly overlapping CPGs. Much less is known about how vertebrates generate multiple, rhythmic behaviors involving the same muscles. The spinal cord of limbed vertebrates contains CPGs for locomotion and multiple forms of scratching. We investigated the extent of sharing of CPGs for hind limb locomotion and for scratching. We used the spinal cord of adult red-eared turtles. Animals were immobilized to remove movement-related sensory feedback and were spinally transected to remove input from the brain. We took two approaches. First, we monitored individual spinal cord interneurons (i.e., neurons that are in between sensory neurons and motor neurons) during generation of each kind of rhythmic output of motor neurons (i.e., each motor pattern). Many spinal cord interneurons were rhythmically activated during the motor patterns for forward swimming and all three forms of scratching. Some of these scratch/swim interneurons had physiological and morphological properties consistent with their playing a role in the generation of motor patterns for all of these rhythmic behaviors. Other spinal cord interneurons, however, were rhythmically activated during scratching motor patterns but inhibited during swimming motor patterns. Thus, locomotion and scratching may be generated by partly shared spinal cord CPGs. Second, we delivered swim-evoking and scratch-evoking stimuli simultaneously and monitored the resulting motor patterns. Simultaneous stimulation could cause interactions of scratch inputs with subthreshold swim inputs to produce normal swimming, acceleration of the swimming rhythm, scratch-swim hybrid cycles, or complete cessation of the rhythm. The type of effect obtained depended on the level of swim-evoking stimulation. These effects suggest that swim-evoking and scratch-evoking inputs can interact strongly in the spinal cord to modify the rhythm and pattern of motor output. Collectively, the single-neuron recordings and the results of simultaneous stimulation suggest that important elements of the generation of rhythms and patterns are shared between locomotion and scratching in limbed vertebrates.     

Central pattern generating networks in insect locomotion

Central pattern generators (CPGs) are neural circuits that based on their connectivity can generate rhythmic and patterned output in the absence of rhythmic external inputs. This property makes CPGs crucial elements in the generation of many kinds of rhythmic motor behaviors in insects, such as flying, walking, swimming, or crawling. Arguably representing the most diverse group of animals, insects utilize at least one of these types of locomotion during one stage of their ontogenesis. Insects have been extensively used to study the neural basis of rhythmic motor behaviors, and particularly the structure and operation of CPGs involved in locomotion. Here, we review insect locomotion with regard to flying, walking, and crawling, and we discuss the contribution of central pattern generation to these three forms of locomotion. In each case, we compare and contrast the topology and structure of the CPGs, and we point out how these factors are involved in the generation of the respective motor pattern. We focus on the importance of sensory information for establishing a functional motor output and we indicate behavior‐specific adaptations. Furthermore, we report on the mechanisms underlying coordination between different body parts. Last but not least, by reviewing the state‐of‐the‐art knowledge concerning the role of CPGs in insect locomotion, we endeavor to create a common ground, upon which future research in the field of motor control in insects can build.     

Modulation of swimming speed in the pteropod mollusc,Clione limacina: Role of a compartmental serotonergic system

In locomotory systems, the central pattern generator and motoneuron output must be modulated in order to achieve variability in locomotory speed, particularly when speed changes are important components of different behavior acts. The swimming system of the pteropod molluscClione limacina is an excellent model system for investigating such modulation. In particular, a system of central serotonergic neurons has been shown to be intimately involved in regulating output of the locomotory pattern generator and motor system ofClione. There are approximately 27 pairs of serotonin-immunoreactive neurons in the central nervous system ofClione, with about 75% of these identified. The majority of these identified immunoreactive neurons are involved in various aspects of locomotory speed modulation. A symmetrical cluster of pedal serotonergic neurons serves to increase wing contractility without affecting wing-beat frequency or motoneuron activity. Two clusters of cerebral cells produce widespread responses that lead to an increase in pattern generator cycle frequency, recruitment of swim motoneurons, activation of the pedal serotonergic neurons and excitation of the heart excitor neuron. A pair of ventral cerebral neurons provides weak excitatory inputs to the swimming system, and strongly inhibits neurons of the competing whole-body withdrawal network. Overall, the serotonergic system inClione is compartmentalized so that each subsystem (usually neuron cluster) can act independently or in concert to produce variability in locomotory speed.     

Spinal pattern generation

Recent research in the field of spinal pattern generation has concentrated on three main areas: the effects of various transmitters on spinal rhythmic patterns in reduced preparations (neonatal rats, chick embryos, tadpole embryos, lampreys); the changes in membrane properties of different elements of the generating circuits; and the interactions between central generating mechanisms and afferent inputs. The important message is that new properties of neural membranes, as well as new reflex responses, have been identified that could not have been predicted in the absence of such rhythmic activity.     

On the definition of central pattern generator and its sensory control

A central pattern generator (CPG) is defined here as a neural network responsible for the production of the timing cues of a rhythmic motor output pattern in the isolated CNS. For the intact animal, model considerations show that this term is neither clearly delimited from the concept of a reflex chain nor from the concept of a pattern generator with functional principles different from those of the CPG. Therefore, it cannot be concluded from the existence of a CPG in the isolated nervous system that this CPG also provides the decisive timing cues in the intact animal. Consequences for the study of the neural basis of rhythmic movements are shown.     

Rhythmic behaviour and pattern-generating circuits in the locust: Key concepts and recent updates

There is growing recognition that rhythmic activity patterns are widespread in our brain and play an important role in all aspects of the functioning of our nervous system, from sensory integration to central processing and motor control. The study of the unique properties that enable central circuits to generate their rhythmic output in the absence of any patterned, sensory or descending, inputs, has been very rewarding in the relatively simple invertebrate preparations. The locust, specifically, is a remarkable example of an organism in which central pattern generator (CPG) networks have been suggested and studied in practically all aspects of their behaviour. Here we present an updated overview of the various rhythmic behaviours in the locust and aspects of their neural control. We focus on the fundamental concepts of multifunctional neuronal circuits, neural centre interactions and neuromodulation of CPG networks. We are certain that the very broad and solid knowledge base of locust rhythmic behaviour and pattern-generating circuits will continue to expand and further contribute to our understanding of the principles behind the functioning of the nervous system and, indeed, the brain.     

Central pattern generators: some principles learned from invertebrate model systems.

1. Central pattern generators (CPGs) underlie a wide variety of rhythmic behaviours such as locomotion and respiration in most multi-cellular organisms. 2. The CPG's are capable of generating a patterned output without phasic sensory input. 3. The organization of the CPG is due to both intrinsic properties of the individual neurons and their network interactions. 4. To gain an understanding of the mechanisms which underlie rhythmicity a CPG has been reconstructed in culture. This will allow investigators to test directly the mechanisms underlying the generation of rhythmic output and will allow the direct testing of the mechanisms by which various modulators affect the CPG.     

Development of rhythmic pattern generators

In contrast to the wealth of knowledge about the organizational rules of adult central pattern generators, far less is known about how these networks are assembled during development. The basic architecture for adult central pattern generators appears early in development but different generators may follow completely different developmental pathways to reach maturity. Recent evidence suggests that neuromodulatory inputs, in addition to their short-term adaptive control of central pattern generator activity, play a crucial role in both the final developmental tuning and the long-term maintenance of adult network function.     

Neural circuit flexibility in a small sensorimotor system

Neuronal circuits underlying rhythmic behaviors (central pattern generators: CPGs) can generate rhythmic motor output without sensory input. However, sensory input is pivotal for generating behaviorally relevant CPG output. Here we discuss recent work in the decapod crustacean stomatogastric nervous system (STNS) identifying cellular and synaptic mechanisms whereby sensory inputs select particular motor outputs from CPG circuits. This includes several examples in which sensory neurons regulate the impact of descending projection neurons on CPG circuits. This level of analysis is possible in the STNS due to the relatively unique access to identified circuit, projection, and sensory neurons. These studies are also revealing additional degrees of freedom in sensorimotor integration that underlie the extensive flexibility intrinsic to rhythmic motor systems.     

Flip,flop and fly: modulated motor control and highly variable movement patterns of autotomized gecko tails

Many animals lose and regenerate appendages, and tail autotomy in lizards is an extremely well-studied example of this. Whereas the energetic, ecological and functional ramifications of tail loss for many lizards have been extensively documented, little is known about the behaviour and neuromuscular control of the autotomized tail. We used electromyography and high-speed video to quantify the motor control and movement patterns of autotomized tails of leopard geckos (Eublepharis macularius). In addition to rhythmic swinging, we show that they exhibit extremely complex movement patterns for up to 30 min following autotomy, including acrobatic flips up to 3 cm in height. Unlike the output of most central pattern generators (CPGs), muscular control of the tail is variable and can be arrhythmic. We suggest that the gecko tail is well suited for studies involving CPGs, given that this spinal preparation is naturally occurring, requires no surgery and exhibits complex modulation.     

The Contributions of Motor Neuronal and Muscle Modulation to Behavioral Flexibility in the Stomatogastric System

The stomatogastric nervous system of crustaceans, which controlsthe four parts ofthe foregut, is subject to modulation at alllevels, sensory, central and motor. Modulation of the centralpattern generators, which are themselves made up largely ofmotor neurons, providesfor increased behavioral flexibilityin a variety of ways. First, each of the pattern generatorscan be reconfigured to give multiple outputs. Second, the "boundaries"of the different pattern generators are in fact somewhat fluid,so that the neuronal composition of the pattern generators canbe altered. For example, neurons can switch from one patterngenerator toanother, or two or more pattern generators can fuseto generate an entirely new pattern and thereby produce a newbehavior. The mechanisms responsible for many of these modulationsinclude alterations of both intrinsic properties and synapticinteractions between neurons. In addition, the alteration ofmembrane properties contributes more directly to the behavioraloutput by changing action potential frequency. Finally, themuscles of the stomatogastric system can themselves be modulated,with the cpvl muscle, for example, becoming an endogenous oscillatorin the presence of either dopamine or the peptide FMRFamide.     

Pattern generation

Central pattern generators are neuronal ensembles capable of producing the basic spatiotemporal patterns underlying ‘automatic’ movements (e.g. locomotion, respiration, swallowing and defense reactions), in the absence of peripheral feedback. Different experimental approaches, from classical electrophysiological and pharmacological methods to molecular and genetic ones, have been used to understand the cellular and synaptic bases of central pattern generator organization and reconfiguration of generator operation in behaviorally relevant contexts. Recently, it has been shown that the high reliability and flexibility of central pattern generators is determined by their redundant organization. Everything that is crucial for generator operation is determined by a number of complementary mechanisms acting in concert; however, various mechanisms are weighted differently in determining different aspects of central pattern generator operation.     

The functional sense of central oscillations in walking

 Rhythmic motor output is generally assumed to be produced by central pattern generators or, more specific, central oscillators, the rhythmic output of which can be entrained and modulated by sensory input and descending control. In the case of locomotor systems, the output of the central system, i.e., the output obtained after deafferentation of sensory feedback, shows many of the temporal characteristics of real movements. Therefore the term fictive locomotion has been coined. This article concentrates on a specific locomotor behavior, namely walking; in particular walking in invertebrates. In contrast to the traditional view, an alternative hypothesis is formulated to interpret the functional sense of these central oscillations which have been found in many cases. It is argued that the basic function of the underlying circuit is to avoid cocontraction of antagonistic muscles. Such a system operates best with an inherent period just above the maximum period observed in real walking. The circuit discussed in this article (Fig. 2) shows several properties in common with results described as “fictive walking”. It furthermore could explain a number of properties observed in animals walking in different situations. According to this hypothesis, the oscillations found after deafferentation are side effects occurring in specific artificial situations. If, however, a parameter called central excitation is large enough, the system can act as a central oscillator that overrides the sensory input completely. Received: 18 May 2001 / Accepted in revised form: 20 November 2001     

Possible Linkage between the Ability to Change the Period (τ) of the Prolactin and Cortisol Rhythms in Women and Breast Cancer Risk

The 24 h profiles of plasma hormone concentrations are rhythmic. The circadian period (τ) changes in development, with seasons, and in women with different stages of the menstrual cycle. It is known that the rhythms of prolactin and cortisol are sensitive to environmental time cues, such as changes in day length and phase; however, the importance of these changes is not yet understood. This study investigates whether there is a relation between the ability of a subject to respond to external cues that are associated with seasonal changes causing alteration of the rhythm's periods in cortisol and prolactin and the epidemiologically determined susceptibility to breast cancer. It is shown that the rhythmic output pattern of prolactin and cortisol in vivo is generated by more than one oscillator and structured by more than one rhythmic component. Each cohort of American women, classified on an epidemiologic basis as high risk (HR) or low risk (LR) to develop breast cancer, expresses different rhythmic output patterns of both variables, suggesting that the genetic background as defined by the risk state is related to differences in the circadian time structure, including the ability of the subject to change the rhythm's τ. The LR cohort exhibited a statistically significant change between seasons in the rhythm's τ of both the prolactin and cortisol patterns. In contrast, the HR cohort showed no change in the rhythm's τ between seasons for prolactin and cortisol patterns. These results show that in human beings, the presence of a circannual rhythm in the circadian time structure or the ability to adapt the circadian rhythmic pattern of these variables to external cues, such as seasons, is related to the partly genetically determined risk state to develop breast cancer and may be of importance for human health.