Predictive testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: subjective perception regarding colorectal and endometrial cancer, distress, and health-related behavior at one year post-test

This study evaluated illness representations, distress, and health-related behavior one year after disclosure of a predictive genetic test result for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) in 36 carriers and 36 noncarriers. Post-test, no significant differences between carriers and noncarriers were found in perceived risk and perceived seriousness of colorectal and endometrial cancer or in perceived control over endometrial cancer. Confidence in the controllability of colorectal cancer by means of medical examinations was higher for carriers than noncarriers post-test. Mean levels of distress (cancer-specific distress, state anxiety, psychoneuroticism) were within normal ranges and none of the participants had an overall pattern (on all scales) of clinically elevated levels of distress. Carriers had significantly higher cancer-related distress one year posttest than noncarriers. In both groups, colorectal cancer-related distress decreased. Noncarriers additionally showed decreased endometrial cancer-related distress and state anxiety. Within the year after testing, none of the noncarriers had a colonoscopy and all carriers where adherent to the recommendations regarding colorectal cancer screening. Although interview data delineated individually different problems specifically related to predictive testing (e.g., worry, difficulties in relation to other relatives, burden of regular follow-up), generally, predictive testing for HNPCC does not seem to induce major psychological problems. Moreover, the presented data are promising regarding the impact on health-related behavior.     

Discrepancies between estimated and perceived risk of cancer among individuals with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

Communicating cancer risk and recommending adequate control programs is central for genetic counseling. Individuals affected by hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) are at about 80% life-time risk of colorectal cancer and for female carriers 40-60% risk of endometrial cancer and 10-15% risk of ovarian cancer. The perceived risk among mutation carriers may, however, deviate from the risk communicated and has been demonstrated to influence adherence to control programs. We investigated the perceived cancer risk among HNPCC mutation carriers (n = 47) and correlated the findings to individual characteristics. A perceived risk of colorectal cancer above 60% was reported by 22/45 individuals, and only one out of five mutation carriers reported a perceived risk > 80%. Female mutation carriers, individuals below age 50, and individuals who received their oncogenetic counseling within 1 year prior to the study reported higher, albeit not significantly, perceived risks of colorectal cancer. Higher perceived risks were also reported by individuals who had lost a parent to HNPCC-related cancer at early age, whereas individuals with a personal history of cancer did not report a higher perceived risk. Regarding gynecological cancer, 6/18 females reported a perceived risk of 40-60% for endometrial cancer, whereas the remaining women both underestimated and overestimated their risk, and none of the women referred to the risk of ovarian cancer. We conclude that despite educational efforts and an increasing amount of data on the cancer risk in HNPCC, a minority of the mutation carriers report a perceived risk at the same level as that communicated during oncogenetic counseling.     

Attitudes toward genetic testing for cancer risk after genetic counseling and decision support: a qualitative comparison between hereditary cancer types

This study aimed to qualitatively assess individuals' attitudes toward genetic testing for cancer risk after genetic counseling and decision support. As part of a larger study, 78 women considering genetic testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) risk and 22 individuals considering genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) completed an open-ended table of their perceived pros and cons of genetic testing. The most frequently reported pros were "to help manage my risk of developing cancer," "to help my family," and "to know my cancer risk." With regards to risk management, the HBOC group perceived genetic testing as most helpful in informing their general risk management practices, while the HN-PCC group focused on the potential to clarify their need for bowel cancer screening, suggesting that patients' perceptions of the benefits of genetic testing may differ across cancer syndromes. Individuals in both groups expressed concern about the potential psychological impact of genetic testing. We also found that some affected individuals may not fully comprehend the meaning of their potential test results. Eliciting patients' perceived pros and cons during genetic counseling is likely to be a valuable tool for improving patient care. This data also provides an improved evidence base for the development of patient education tools.     

Attitudes toward genetic testing in patients at risk for HNPCC/FAP and the German population

Adequate knowledge regarding hereditary diseases and genetics, as well as personal attitudes toward gene tests, are major determinants of optimal utilization of genetic testing. In the present study, we aimed to explore the general attitudes toward genetic testing in a sample representative of the German general population (n = 2,076) and to compare the attitudes of persons at risk for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer/familial adenomatous polyposis (HNPCC/FAP) (n = 36) who had attended a university genetic counseling service, with a matched general population sample. We administered a subset of a questionnaire previously used in a Finnish study (Jallinoja et al., 1998). The 12 statements pertain to approval, disapproval, and concern for genetic testing. Overall, the results reveal high approval of genetic testing in the German population and in at-risk persons. In accordance with other studies, we find that the attitudes of individuals for whom hereditary disease is a salient issue of personal relevance and the attitudes of the general public are very similar. Only a few significant differences between these two samples emerged, indicating that at-risk persons hold a more favourable view of the testing. One intriguing finding was the high rate of "don't know" responses, especially in the general population sample. Compared to results from Finland, approval of genetic testing is lower in the German population, and endorsement of "don't knows" is remarkably higher. We argue for increased attention to the issue of attitude change after genetic counseling and for the need of comparative cross-cultural research on attitudes toward gene technology.     

Screening for an inherited susceptibility to colorectal cancer

The principal Mendelian disorders predisposing to colorectal cancer are familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). FAP is caused by mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene. HNPCC is caused by a mutation in one of at least five mismatch repair genes. It is important to identify individuals with these conditions because colon cancer will occur in at least 80% and onset is earlier than in the general population. Potential benefits of identification include improved compliance with recommended surveillance, early detection of polyps, reduction in cancer mortality, and reassurance for relatives found to be negative with attendant savings in the time and expense of surveillance. For classic FAP, the large number of polyps readily identifies affected persons. For HNPCC, identification of individuals meriting DNA sequencing requires either recognition of a suspect family history or finding high microsatellite instability in a tumor. Individuals accepting the offer of genetic counseling and DNA testing often have more cancers in their family, are motivated to inform relatives, have a larger social network, and have more confidence in their coping ability. Individuals who decline are often concerned about their own or their family's emotional reaction or fear discrimination.     

Klinik und Genetik des familiären Darmkrebses

Familial clustering of colorectal cancer (CRC) and early disease onset are indicators of an inherited tumour syndrome. Monogenic dispositions account for 3–5% of all CRC cases and are subdivided into hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC/Lynch syndrome) and various gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes. Many of these syndromes are characterised by a broad spectrum of extracolonic tumours. Early detection and accurate classification are essential in providing effective surveillance and treatment. Initial diagnosis is based on endoscopic and histological findings as well as on the presence of extracolonic manifestations and family history. Molecular genetic examination is important for the differential diagnosis, evaluation of recurrence risk, and predictive testing of asymptomatic at risk individuals; it is performed according to largely standardised algorithms. Diagnostic difficulties are common among the hamartomatous polyposes due to their broad phenotypic overlap and frequent uncertainties in histological evaluation, as well as among patients with few adenomas. Risk-adapted surveillance guidelines have been established for HNPCC and for the more frequently observed polyposis syndromes. Beyond established tumour syndromes, familial clustering of CRC (which is often of late onset) or the occurrence of few adenomas is likely to be based upon a multifactorial (complex) etiology. Although identification of the underlying genetic risk factors and biological pathways is still in the early stages, rapid progress is being made due to methodical developments such as genome-wide association studies and CNV analysis.     

Genetic predictive testing for bowel cancer predisposition: the impact on the individual.

When considering the impact of a genetic diagnosis of hereditary predisposition to colon cancer, there are many similarities to other predictive genetic tests, but also many differences. The development and availability of such genetic diagnoses, and the concept of testing being linked to effective prevention, have advanced rapidly, opening up not only unique opportunities but also unique psychosocial situations for the affected families-and unusual ethical issues for the professional. Compared to a diagnosis of sporadic colorectal cancer for a patient, hereditary colorectal cancer requires an understanding of genetics, heredity, and the attendant mathematics of risk calculation, but, most importantly, there must be a belief that it is possible to remain healthy whilst having an increased risk. This paper outlines the possible impact of a genetic diagnosis of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) on both the individual and the family and concludes that genetic testing should be accompanied by genetic counseling. Relevant ethical issues are also introduced, with the opinion presented suggesting that if primary considerations are always for the individual rather than the family or society, then unethical or eugenic decisions are likely to be avoided.     

Impact of genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility

Previously, we have reported a clinical trial in which any woman in a defined geographic region who had a qualifying family history and who was referred by her physician or who was identified through a regional cancer registry was offered free genetic counseling, BRCA testing, and recommendations based on test results. Each family was represented by one affected and one unaffected person. Of the 87 families actually tested, 13 were found to have deleterious mutations. To assess the impact of the counseling and testing process, we contacted the tested individuals 1 month and 1 year after receiving the test result and those with an abnormal test result after 4 years. Index subjects, we found, differed significantly from relatives. Before coming for counseling, index subjects perceived both their general health and emotional health as worse than did their relatives. After counseling and testing, index subjects continue to worry more about breast cancer than do relatives. Affected subjects, we found, differed significantly from unaffected subjects. Before counseling, affected subjects knew more about breast cancer, perceived their general health as poorer, and reported greater adherence to recommended breast cancer surveillance than did unaffected subjects. After counseling and testing, affected subjects were less satisfied than unaffected subjects with having been tested. This study indicates that the group most prone to distress by cancer risk genetic counseling and testing is not the recruited relatives, nor even those affected with cancer, but rather the index patients themselves. The index patients, i.e., the ones who want the risk information most, appear to undergo the most stress in obtaining it.     

Genetics of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. As such, it assumes a significant role in both health policy decision-making and scientific research. CRC has been a model for investigating the molecular genetics of cancer development and progression; this is in part due to the easily detectable, sequential transition of cells from normal colonic epithelium to adenoma and then to adenocarcinoma. In addition, familial syndromes that predispose to CRC, such as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), have significantly contributed to our understanding of the genetic mechanisms underlying CRC formation. It is now well recognized that hereditary CRC syndromes are due to germline mutations of genes that function as tumor suppressors or, less frequently, oncogenes. Accumulation of subsequent mutations in other genes with related functions results in the stepwise progression to carcinoma. It is important to note that somatic changes in similar genes are involved in the formation of sporadic CRC. The identification of these important CRC-related genes may help facilitate the early diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of CRC. This article reviews the various familial CRC syndromes along with their genetic etiology, as well as discusses the principle of genetic testing for these conditions.     

High oxygen radical production in patients with sporadic colorectal cancer

It is hypothesized that excessive generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by phagocytes or leakage from mitochondria may harm key genes or proteins responsible for intestinal cell homeostasis. This may initiate the multistage process of colon cancer development. The present study investigates whether ROS production by whole blood may contribute to the etiology of colorectal cancer (CRC). Whole-blood oxygen radical production was measured by luminol-enhanced chemiluminescence and performed in fourfold with and without the stimuli phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and serum-treated zymosan (STZ). We evaluated patients (i) with a history of sporadic CRC at least 3 months after surgery, (ii) who were hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) gene carriers, and (iii) with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). For each patient group (n = 20) an age- and gender-matched healthy control group was measured. Unstimulated and PMA-stimulated values for maximal oxygen radical production were significantly higher in patients with sporadic CRC in comparison to controls (p = 0.01, p = 0.04, respectively). Furthermore, trends toward higher unstimulated and PMA-stimulated area under the curve chemiluminescence were seen in CRC patients compared with controls (p = 0.08, p = 0.09, respectively). In patients with HNPCC or FAP, unstimulated or PMA- or STZ-stimulated chemiluminescence did not differ compared to their control groups. In conclusion, whole-blood oxygen radical production was higher in patients with a history of sporadic CRC, in comparison with age- and gender-matched controls, which indicates that ROS may play a role in the etiology of sporadic CRC.     

Simultaneous interdisciplinary counseling in German breast/ovarian cancer families: first experiences with patient perceptions, surveillance behavior and acceptance of genetic testing

As part of a multicenter study supported by the German Mildred Scheel foundation we have established an interdisciplinary counseling setting for members of breast and/or ovarian cancer families. We offer simultaneous counseling by a team consisting of a geneticist, a gynecologist and a psycho-oncologist. Here we describe our counseling protocol and our first short-term experience with this interdisciplinary approach. Preliminary data on patient perceptions and behaviors in the context of DNA testing are reported. Overall, our counseling approach was perceived as beneficial both by the counselors and the consultants. A marked overestimation of the risk to develop breast and/or ovarian cancer was noted in the group of unaffected individuals from medium to low risk breast cancer families in contrast to an appropriate risk perception in members from high risk families. All participants shared many of the same expectations about genetic testing and counseling and appeared to base their decision-making about testing on the risk classification given by the genetic counselor. The reported participation in gynecological cancer prevention programs was high in all families at risk, but was less sufficient in unaffected as compared to affected persons. Although current data on BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation analyses render testing in medium to low risk individuals questionable, our findings emphasize the importance of genetic counseling and education in all risk categories of breast and/or ovarian cancer families.     

The value of MUTYH testing in patients with early onset microsatellite stable colorectal cancer referred for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer syndrome testing

MUTYH adenomatous polyposis (MAP) can mimic both the familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) phenotypes. As a result of MAP's phenotypic overlap with FAP, some DNA diagnostic laboratories perform MUTYH testing in conjunction with APC testing in patients with suspected FAP or attenuated FAP (AFAP). In addition to testing FAP/AFAP samples for MUTYH mutations, we were interested whether there would also be value in testing samples referred for HNPCC testing. To determine this, we tested a consecutive series of 229 samples referred for HNPCC testing for the two most common MUTYH mutations in the Caucasian population. To enrich our study population with MAP cases, we only included samples from patients with early onset colorectal cancer (CRC diagnosed <50 years old) in whom HNPCC had been excluded by microsatellite instability testing (microsatellite stable or low microsatellite instability). Four biallelic (2%) and six monoallelic (3%) MUTYH mutation carriers were identified. No clinical factors predicted MUTYH mutation status. Specifically, a family history of vertical transmission of CRC or having few polyps (<15) did not rule out the possibility of biallelic MUTYH mutations. Thus, MUTYH mutation testing may be a reasonable cascade test in early onset CRC found to have proficient DNA mismatch repair, regardless of pattern of family history or number of polyps.     

Subjective and objective risk of breast cancer in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals at risk for BRCA1/2 mutations

The aims of the study were to (1) examine the differences between subjective and objective estimates of the risk of breast cancer in those being tested for BRCA1/2 mutations, (2) explore new ways to conceptualize risk, and (3) examine the change in subjective risk of developing breast cancer throughout the process of genetic counseling and testing. Participants were 86 Ashkenazi Jewish women with a family or personal history indicating risk for BRCA1/2 mutations. Surveys to assess subjective risk of breast cancer (percentage risk, projected age of onset, and survival time) were administered before counseling, after counseling, and after receipt of test results. Subjective percentage risk of breast cancer was compared to estimated objective risk to determine accuracy. Those with no personal history of cancer receiving positive results became more accurate from post-counseling to post-result. Those receiving positive results increased their estimate of their percentage risk, and those receiving uninformative negative results decreased their estimate of their percentage risk from post-counseling to post-result. Those without a personal history of cancer decreased in perceived risk from post-counseling to post-result. No change in projected age of onset of breast cancer or survival time with breast cancer was seen from pre- to post-counseling or from post-counseling to post-result, and no change in accuracy or in percentage risk of breast cancer was seen from pre- to post-counseling. Individuals use information from genetic counseling to form estimates of percentage risk following receipt of test results; however, projected age of onset and survival time with breast cancer, areas not targeted by genetic counseling that may be more closely linked to health behavior, do not change.     

Mutational analysis of the hMSH6 gene in familial and early-onset colorectal and endometrial cancer in Israeli patients

Familial colorectal cancer (CRC) is noted in about 15% of incident CRC cases, and at times is hallmarked by an age at diagnosis less than 50 years. Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) account for about 40% of familial cases. Thus, the majority of familial and early-onset CRC remain genetically elusive. Similarly, the majority of familial and early onset endometrial cancer (EC), the most prevalent extracolonic tumor in HNPCC, are genetically undefined. An attractive candidate is the hMSH6 gene. Israeli patients with early onset (age under 50 years) (n = 44) and familial nonsyndromic (n = 23) CRC, and women with familial clustering of EC or CRC (n = 12), and those diagnosed with EC at, or under, the age of 50 years (n = 5) were genotyped for germ-line mutations within the hMSH6 gene. Exon-specific PCR was followed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis, complemented by DNA sequencing of abnormally migrating fragments. No patients displayed a truncating mutation, and 1 CRC patient harbored a novel missense mutation (V878A). In addition, 6 previously described polymorphisms were detected. In conclusion, mutations in the hMSH6 gene occur uncommonly in Israeli patients with familial and early-onset CRC and EC.     

Missense mutations in hMLH1 associated with colorectal cancer

One of the most prevalent hereditary syndromes associated with colorectal cancer is hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). The inherited gene defects in HNPCC have been shown to reside in DNA mismatch repair genes, mostly hMSH2 or hMLH1. Most HNPCC patients are heterozygous with regard to the relevant mismatch repair gene; they have one normal and one mutated allele, and mismatch repair in normal somatic cells is functional. Cancer predisposition in HNPCC is believed to be associated with the loss of the wild-type allele in somatic cells, resulting in defective DNA mismatch repair. This gives rise to DNA microsatellite instability (MSI), an increased somatic mutation rate, and eventually, to the accumulation of mutations in genes involved in colorectal carcinogenesis. In support of this theory, colorectal tumors in HNPCC patients and in mice deficient for hMSH2 or hMLH1 show MSI. Here, we describe two missense mutations in hMLH1 exon 16 associated with colorectal cancer. Interestingly, the tumors do not show MSI. This raises some potentially important issues. First, even microsatellite-negative colorectal tumors can be associated with germline mutations and these will be missed if an MSI test is used to select patients for mutation screening. Second, the lack of MSI in these cases suggests that the mechanism involved in carcinogenesis could be different from that generally hypothesized.     

Variants of uncertain clinical significance as a result of BRCA1/2 testing: impact of an ambiguous breast cancer risk message

The identification of an increasing number of variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUCS) in genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer poses serious problems for genetic counseling, because no data are available about the psychosocial impact of discussing such an unclear risk message. The current study is the first to present data on how test applicants actually understand and cope with such a result if communicated by a geneticist. We compared 10 women who received a VUCS result with 34 women who carried the deleterious mutation, 37 women who did not carry the deleterious mutation or 'true negatives,' and 160 women who received a so-called inconclusive result before and after test disclosure. Women, with whom a VUCS result was discussed, reported quite a high level of comprehension of the result. In addition, compared with the pretest measures, they did not report a higher level of perceived risk (p = 0.58) and even reported a decrease in breast cancer distress (p = 0.03). They were very comparable to women who received an inconclusive result on all post-disclosure measures. Our results suggest that discussing a VUCS result in genetic counseling does not give rise for concern.     

Molecular diagnostics of cancer predisposition: hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma and mismatch repair defects

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma accounts for 5–13% of all colorectal carcinomas and is inherited in a dominant fashion. Two different forms can be distinguished. Type I is restricted to colorectal cancers, whereas type II patients acquire acolorectal, endometrial, gastric, small intestinal and transitional carcinomas of the upper urinary tract. Germline mutations in the human mismatch repair genes (hMSH2, hMSH6, hMLH1, hPMS2) account for the majority of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma. As a result of the mismatch repair deficiency, replication errors are not repaired, resulting in a mutator phenotype. Simple repetitive sequences (microsatellites) are especially prone to replication errors and analysis of their stability combined with immunohistochemical analysis of mismatch repair protein expression provides a rapid diagnostic strategy. For patients either (1) fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria for HNPCC, (2) with synchronous or metachronous hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma-related tumors, (3) with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma-related tumors before the age of 45 and/or (4) with right sided CRC and mucinous, solid, or cribriform growth patterns, screening for mismatch repair deficiencies should be performed. The identification of colorectal cancers displaying a mutator phenotype has implications for both treatment and prognosis.     

Tumorigenesis in colorectal tumors from patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

Tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer in patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) has been postulated to follow a different pathway from that of sporadic colorectal tumors. A characteristic of HNPCC-associated tumors is the replication error phenotype. We studied tumorigenesis in 8 fresh-frozen and 67 paraffin-embedded colorectal tumors derived from 29 families with HNPCC or a familial aggregation of colorectal cancer. By using intragenic markers, inactivation of the wild-type allele of hMLH1 was shown to occur through loss of heterozygosity and not through a somatic point mutation. Microsatellite instability is very common and occurs early in almost all colorectal tumors from HNPCC patients. Transforming growth factor β type II receptor (TβRII) mutations occur in these tumors at a high frequency. Of colorectal cancers from families with HNPCC, 63% have frameshift mutations in TβRII, compared with 10% of sporadic colorectal cancers. APC and K-RAS mutations appear to be as frequent in the HNPCC tumors as in the sporadic counterpart. Received: 3 March 1997 / Accepted: 23 June 1997     

Fecal occult blood testing instructions and impact on patient adherence

IntroductionAlthough the physician's role with patients is crucial in encouraging FOBT screening, the nature and content of physician-patient discussions about FOBT screening is unclear. As part of a larger study, this paper reports on our analyses of physician beliefs about fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and strategies they employed to enhance patient adherence. The second aim of this paper is to report on the perceptions of individuals at average risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) in regard to their awareness of the FOBT and their responses to physician recommendations about FOBT screening.MethodsThe larger study was conducted in urban and rural Manitoba, Canada between 2008 and 2010. We used a qualitative design and conducted semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews with 15 physicians and 27 individuals at average risk for CRC. We included data from 11 family members or friends on their perspectives of FOBT instructions as individuals who were also at average risk for CRC and had their own experiences with CRC screening recommendations.ResultsDespite widespread knowledge of The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care CRC screening guidelines, physician attitudes, behaviors, and instructions were not uniform in promoting patient adherence to FOBT screening. Individuals at average-risk for CRC identified that FOBT instructions were confusing and burdensome, which in turn served as a barrier in their adherence to FOBT screening.ConclusionsVariation in FOBT instruction counseling in relation to the recommended age of individuals at average risk for CRC, as well as adequate patient preparation affected patient adherence. We recommend uniform or standardized instructions and counseling by health care providers who administer the FOBT kit to patients to promote adherence to recommended CRC screening.     

Evidence for genetic anticipation in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is an autosomal, dominantly inherited, colorectal cancer (CRC) predisposition syndrome caused by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, predominantly MLH1 and MSH2. Thus far, only limited data exist on the occurrence of genetic anticipation in HNPCC, i.e. the earlier age at diagnosis of CRC in successive generations. Performing nonparametric distribution-free statistical analyses, we investigated 55 parent–child pairs who had been diagnosed with CRC and who came from 21 Swiss HNPCC families with characterised MMR germline mutation (15 in MLH1 and 6 in MSH2). The overall median age at diagnosis was 43 years, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 14 and incidence ages ranging from 18 to 62 years. Descendants of HNPCC patients (median age at diagnosis 39 years, IQR=12) were found to be diagnosed with CRC significantly earlier than their parents (47 years, IQR=10), with the median of the paired age difference amounting to 8 years (IQR=15; P<0.0001). Birth cohort effects could be excluded, since the same, statistically significant, age difference was also observed in the oldest offspring birth cohort (birth year <1916; P=0.01). Genetic anticipation appeared to be more pronounced when the disease allele was transmitted through the father than through the mother (median age difference 11 vs. 4 years, respectively; both P<0.01). If confirmed in larger, ideally prospective studies, these results may have important implications for genetic counselling and clinical management of HNPCC families.