CP12 from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, a Permanent Specific ��Chaperone-like�� Protein of Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate Dehydrogenase

A new role is reported for CP12, a highly unfolded and flexible protein, mainly known for its redox function with A₄ glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Both reduced and oxidized CP12 can prevent the in vitro thermal inactivation and aggregation of GAPDH from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. This mechanism is thus not redox-dependent. The protection is specific to CP12, because other proteins, such as bovine serum albumin, thioredoxin, and a general chaperone, Hsp33, do not fully prevent denaturation of GAPDH. Furthermore, CP12 acts as a specific chaperone, since it does not protect other proteins, such as catalase, alcohol dehydrogenase, or lysozyme. The interaction between CP12 and GAPDH is necessary to prevent the aggregation and inactivation, since the mutant C66S that does not form any complex with GAPDH cannot accomplish this protection. Unlike the C66S mutant, the C23S mutant that lacks the N-terminal bridge is partially able to protect and to slow down the inactivation and aggregation. Tryptic digestion coupled to mass spectrometry confirmed that the S-loop of GAPDH is the interaction site with CP12. Thus, CP12 not only has a redox function but also behaves as a specific “chaperone-like protein” for GAPDH, although a stable and not transitory interaction is observed. This new function of CP12 may explain why it is also present in complexes involving A₂B₂ GAPDHs that possess a regulatory C-terminal extension (GapB subunit) and therefore do not require CP12 to be redox-regulated.CP12 is a small 8.2-kDa protein present in the chloroplasts of most photosynthetic organisms, including cyanobacteria (1, 2), higher plants (3), the diatom Asterionella formosa (4, 5), and green (1) and red algae (6). It allows the formation of a supramolecular complex between phosphoribulokinase (EC 2.7.1.19) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH),³ two key enzymes of the Calvin cycle pathway, and was recently shown to interact with fructose bisphosphate aldolase, another enzyme of the Calvin cycle pathway (7). The phosphoribulokinase·GAPDH·CP12 complex has been extensively studied in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (8, 9) and in Arabidopsis thaliana (10, 11). In the green alga C. reinhardtii, the interaction between CP12 and GAPDH is strong (8). GAPDH may exist as a homotetramer composed of four GapA subunits (A₄) in higher plants, cyanobacteria, and green and red algae (6, 12), but in higher plants, it can also exist as a heterotetramer (A₂B₂), composed of two subunits, GapA and GapB (13, 14). GapB, up to now, has exclusively been found in Streptophyta, but recently two prasinophycean green algae, Ostreococcus tauri and Ostreococcus lucimarinus, were also shown to possess a GapB gene, whereas CP12 is missing (15). The GapB subunit is similar to the GapA subunit but has a C-terminal extension containing two redox-regulated cysteine residues (16). Thus, although the A₄ GAPDHs lack these regulatory cysteine residues (13, 14, 17–20), they are also redox-regulated through its interaction with CP12, since the C terminus of this small protein resembles the C-terminal extension of the GapB subunit. The regulatory cysteine residues for GapA are thus supplied by CP12, as is well documented in the literature (1, 8, 11, 16).CP12 belongs to the family of intrinsically unstructured proteins (IUPs) (21–26). The amino acid composition of these proteins causes them to have no or few secondary structures. Their total or partial lack of structure and their high flexibility allow them to be molecular adaptors (27, 28). They are often able to bind to several partners and are involved in most cellular functions (29, 30). Recently, some IUPs have been described in photosynthetic organisms (31, 32).There are many functional categories of IUPs (22, 33). They can be, for instance, involved in permanent binding and have (i) a scavenger role, neutralizing or storing small ligands; (ii) an assembler role by forming complexes; and (iii) an effector role by modulating the activity of a partner molecule (33). These functions are not exclusive; thus, CP12 can form a stable complex with GAPDH, regulating its redox properties (8, 34, 35), and can also bind a metal ion (36, 37). IUPs can also bind transiently to partners, and some of them have been found to possess a chaperone activity (31, 38). This chaperone function was first shown for α-synuclein (39) and for α-casein (40), which are fully disordered. The amino acid composition of IUPs is less hydrophobic than those of soluble proteins; hence, they lack hydrophobic cores and do not become insoluble when heated. Since CP12 belongs to this family, we tested if it was resistant to heat treatment and finally, since it is tightly bound to GAPDH, if it could prevent aggregation of its partner, GAPDH, an enzyme well known for its tendency to aggregate (41–44) and consequently a substrate commonly used in chaperone studies (45, 46).Unlike chaperones, which form transient, dynamic complexes with their protein substrates through hydrophobic interactions (47, 48), CP12 forms a stable complex with GAPDH. The interaction involves the C-terminal part of the protein and the presence of negatively charged residues on CP12 (35). However, only a site-directed mutagenesis has been performed to characterize the interaction site on GAPDH. Although the mutation could have an indirect effect, the residue Arg-197 was shown to be a good candidate for the interaction site (49).In this report, we accordingly used proteolysis experiments coupled with mass spectrometry to detect which regions of GAPDH are protected by its association with CP12. To conclude, the aim of this report was to characterize a chaperone function of CP12 that had never been described before and to map the interaction site on GAPDH using an approach that does not involve site-directed mutagenesis.     

Aquaporin-2 in the ��-omics�� Era

Vasopressin controls renal water excretion largely through actions to regulate the water channel aquaporin-2 in collecting duct principal cells. Our knowledge of the mechanisms involved has increased markedly in recent years with the advent of methods for large-scale systems-level profiling such as protein mass spectrometry, yeast two-hybrid analysis, and oligonucleotide microarrays. Here we review this progress.Regulation of water excretion by the kidney is one of the most visible aspects of everyday physiology. An outdoor tennis game on a hot summer day can result in substantial water losses by sweating, and the kidneys respond by reducing water excretion. In contrast, excessive intake of water, a frequent occurrence in everyday life, results in excretion of copious amounts of clear urine. These responses serve to exact tight control on the tonicity of body fluids, maintaining serum osmolality in the range of 290–294 mosmol/kg of H₂O through the regulated return of water from the pro-urine in the renal collecting ducts to the bloodstream.The importance of this process is highlighted when the regulation fails. For example, polyuria (rapid uncontrolled excretion of water) is a sometimes devastating consequence of lithium therapy for bipolar disorder. On the other side of the coin are water balance disorders that result from excessive renal water retention causing systemic hypo-osmolality or hyponatremia. Hyponatremia due to excessive water retention can be seen with severe congestive heart failure, hepatic cirrhosis, and the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis.The chief regulator of water excretion is the peptide hormone AVP,² whereas the chief molecular target for regulation is the water channel AQP2. In this minireview, we describe new progress in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in regulation of AQP2 by AVP in collecting duct cells, with emphasis on new information derived from “systems-level” approaches involving large-scale profiling and screening techniques such as oligonucleotide arrays, protein mass spectrometry, and yeast two-hybrid analysis. Most of the progress with these techniques is in the identification of individual molecules involved in AVP signaling and binding interactions with AQP2. Additional related issues are addressed in several recent reviews (1–4).     

An N-Glycosylation Site on the��-Propeller Domain of the Integrin ��5 Subunit Plays Key Roles in Both Its Function and Site-specific Modification by��1,4-N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase III

Recently we reported that N-glycans on the β-propeller domain of the integrin α5 subunit (S-3,4,5) are essential for α5β1 heterodimerization, expression, and cell adhesion. Herein to further investigate which N-glycosylation site is the most important for the biological function and regulation, we characterized the S-3,4,5 mutants in detail. We found that site-4 is a key site that can be specifically modified by N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnT-III). The introduction of bisecting GlcNAc into the S-3,4,5 mutant catalyzed by GnT-III decreased cell adhesion and migration on fibronectin, whereas overexpression of N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V) promoted cell migration. The phenomenon is similar to previous observations that the functions of the wild-type α5 subunit were positively and negatively regulated by GnT-V and GnT-III, respectively, suggesting that the α5 subunit could be duplicated by the S-3,4,5 mutant. Interestingly GnT-III specifically modified the S-4,5 mutant but not the S-3,5 mutant. This result was confirmed by erythroagglutinating phytohemagglutinin lectin blot analysis. The reduction in cell adhesion was consistently observed in the S-4,5 mutant but not in the S-3,5 mutant cells. Furthermore mutation of site-4 alone resulted in a substantial decrease in erythroagglutinating phytohemagglutinin lectin staining and suppression of cell spread induced by GnT-III compared with that of either the site-3 single mutant or wild-type α5. These results, taken together, strongly suggest that N-glycosylation of site-4 on the α5 subunit is the most important site for its biological functions. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that site-specific modification of N-glycans by a glycosyltransferase results in functional regulation.Glycosylation is a crucial post-translational modification of most secreted and cell surface proteins (1). Glycosylation is involved in a variety of physiological and pathological events, including cell growth, migration, differentiation, and tumor invasion. It is well known that glycans play important roles in cell-cell communication, intracellular signal transduction, protein folding, and stability (2, 3).Integrins comprise a family of receptors that are important for cell adhesion. The major function of integrins is to connect cells to the extracellular matrix, activate intracellular signaling pathways, and regulate cytoskeletal formation (4). Integrin α5β1 is well known as a fibronectin (FN)³ receptor. The interaction between integrin α5 and FN is essential for cell migration, cell survival, and development (5–8). In addition, integrins are N-glycan carrier proteins. For example, α5β1 integrin contains 14 and 12 putative N-glycosylation sites on the α5 and β1 subunits, respectively. Several studies suggest that N-glycosylation is essential for functional integrin α5β1. When human fibroblasts were cultured in the presence of 1-deoxymannojirimycin, which prevents N-linked oligosaccharide processing, immature α5β1 integrin appeared on the cell surface, and FN-dependent adhesion was greatly reduced (9). Treatment of purified integrin α5β1 with N-glycosidase F, which cleaves between the innermost N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and asparagine N-glycan residues of N-linked glycoproteins, prevented the inherent association between subunits and blocked α5β1 binding to FN (10).A growing body of evidence indicates that the presence of the appropriate oligosaccharide can modulate integrin activation. N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnT-III) catalyzes the addition of GlcNAc to mannose that is β1,4-linked to an underlying N-acetylglucosamine, producing what is known as a “bisecting” GlcNAc linkage as shown in Fig. 1B. GnT-III is generally regarded as a key glycosyltransferase in N-glycan biosynthetic pathways and contributes to inhibition of metastasis. The introduction of a bisecting GlcNAc catalyzed by GnT-III suppresses additional processing and elongation of N-glycans. These reactions, which are catalyzed in vitro by other glycosyltransferases, such as N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V), which catalyzes the formation of β1,6 GlcNAc branching structures (Fig. 1B) and plays important roles in tumor metastasis, do not proceed because the enzymes cannot utilize the bisected N-glycans as a substrate. Introduction of the bisecting GlcNAc to integrin α5 by overexpression of GnT-III resulted in decreased in ligand binding and down-regulation of cell adhesion and migration (11–13). Contrary to the functions of GnT-III, overexpression of GnT-V promoted integrin α5β1-mediated cell migration on FN (14). These observations clearly demonstrate that the alteration of N-glycan structure affected the biological functions of integrin α5β1. Similarly characterization of the carbohydrate moieties in integrin α3β1 from non-metastatic and metastatic human melanoma cell lines showed that expression of β1,6 GlcNAc branched structures was higher in metastatic cells compared with non-metastatic cells, confirming the notion that the β1,6 GlcNAc branched structure confers invasive and metastatic properties to cancer cells. In fact, Partridge et al. (15) reported that GnT-V-modified N-glycans containing poly-N-acetyllactosamine, the preferred ligand for galectin-3, on surface receptors oppose their constitutive endocytosis, promoting intracellular signaling and consequently cell migration and tumor metastasis.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Potential N-glycosylation sites on the α5 subunit and its modification by GnT-III and GnT-V. A, schematic diagram of potential N-glycosylation sites on the α5 subunit. Putative N-glycosylation sites are indicated by triangles, and point mutations are indicated by crosses (N84Q, N182Q, N297Q, N307Q, N316Q, N524Q, N530Q, N593Q, N609Q, N675Q, N712Q, N724Q, N773Q, and N868Q). B, illustration of the reaction catalyzed by GnT-III and GnT-V. Square, GlcNAc; circle, mannose. TM, transmembrane domain.In addition, sialylation on the non-reducing terminus of N-glycans of α5β1 integrin plays an important role in cell adhesion. Colon adenocarcinomas express elevated levels of α2,6 sialylation and increased activity of ST6GalI sialyltransferase. Elevated ST6GalI positively correlated with metastasis and poor survival. Therefore, ST6GalI-mediated hypersialylation likely plays a role in colorectal tumor invasion (16, 17). In fact, oncogenic ras up-regulated ST6GalI and, in turn, increased sialylation of β1 integrin adhesion receptors in colon epithelial cells (18). However, this is not always the case. The expression of hyposialylated integrin α5β1 was induced by phorbol esterstimulated differentiation in myeloid cells in which the expression of the ST6GalI was down-regulated by the treatment, increasing FN binding (19). A similar phenomenon was also observed in hematopoietic or other epithelial cells. In these cells, the increased sialylation of the β1 integrin subunit was correlated with reduced adhesiveness and metastatic potential (20–22). In contrast, the enzymatic removal of α2,8-linked oligosialic acids from the α5 integrin subunit inhibited cell adhesion to FN (23). Collectively these findings suggest that the interaction of integrin α5β1 with FN is dependent on its N-glycosylation and the processing status of N-glycans.Because integrin α5β1 contains multipotential N-glycosylation sites, it is important to determine the sites that are crucial for its biological function and regulation. Recently we found that N-glycans on the β-propeller domain (sites 3, 4, and 5) of the integrin α5 subunit are essential for α5β1 heterodimerization, cell surface expression, and biological function (24). In this study, to further investigate the underlying molecular mechanism of GnT-III-regulated biological functions, we characterized the N-glycans on the α5 subunit in detail using genetic and biochemical approaches and found that site-4 is a key site that can be specifically modified by GnT-III.     

Src Phosphorylation of ��-Receptor Is Responsible for the Receptor Switching from an Inhibitory to a Stimulatory Signal

Recent studies have revealed that in G protein-coupled receptor signalings switching between G protein- and β-arrestin (βArr)-dependent pathways occurs. In the case of opioid receptors, the signal is switched from the initial inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (AC) to an increase in AC activity (AC activation) during prolonged agonist treatment. The mechanism of such AC activation has been suggested to involve the switching of G proteins activated by the receptor, phosphorylation of signaling molecules, or receptor-dependent recruitment of cellular proteins. Using protein kinase inhibitors, dominant negative mutant studies and mouse embryonic fibroblast cells isolated from Src kinase knock-out mice, we demonstrated that μ-opioid receptor (OPRM1)-mediated AC activation requires direct association and activation of Src kinase by lipid raft-located OPRM1. Such Src activation was independent of βArr as indicated by the ability of OPRM1 to activate Src and AC after prolonged agonist treatment in mouse embryonic fibroblast cells lacking both βArr-1 and -2. Instead the switching of OPRM1 signals was dependent on the heterotrimeric G protein, specifically G_i2 α-subunit. Among the Src kinase substrates, OPRM1 was phosphorylated at Tyr³³⁶ within NPXXY motif by Src during AC activation. Mutation of this Tyr residue, together with mutation of Tyr¹⁶⁶ within the DRY motif to Phe, resulted in the complete blunting of AC activation. Thus, the recruitment and activation of Src kinase by OPRM1 during chronic agonist treatment, which eventually results in the receptor tyrosine phosphorylation, is the key for switching the opioid receptor signals from its initial AC inhibition to subsequent AC activation.Classical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)² signaling involves the activation of specific heterotrimeric G proteins and the subsequent dissociation of α- and βγ-subunits. These G protein subunits serve as the activators and/or inhibitors of several effector systems, including adenylyl cyclases, phospholipases, and ion channels (1). However, recent studies have shown that GPCR signaling deviates from such a classical linear model. For example, in kidney and colonic epithelial cells, protease-activated receptor 1 can transduce its signals through either Gα_i/o or Gα_q subunits via inhibition of small GTPase RhoA or activation of RhoD. Thus, RhoA and RhoD act as molecular switches between the negative and positive signaling activity of protease-activated receptor 1 (2). Another example is the ability of β₂-adrenergic receptor to switch from G_s-dependent pathways to non-classical signaling pathways by coupling to pertussis toxin-sensitive G_i proteins in a cAMP-dependent protein kinase/protein kinase C phosphorylation-dependent manner. In this case, the phosphorylation-induced switch in G protein coupling provides the receptor access to alternative signaling pathways. For β₂-adrenergic receptors, this leads to a G_i-dependent activation of MAP kinase (3, 4). Furthermore the involvement of protein scaffolds, such as β-arrestins in the MAP kinase cascade, could also alter the GPCR signaling (5–8). Hence the formation of “signaling units” or “receptosomes” would influence the GPCR signaling process and destination.For opioid receptors, which are members of the rhodopsin GPCR subfamily receptors, signal switching is also observed. Normally opioid receptors inhibit AC activity, activate the MAP kinases and Kir3 K⁺ channels, inhibit the voltage-dependent Ca²⁺ channels, and regulate other effectors such as phospholipase C (9). However, during prolonged agonist treatment, not only is there a blunting of these cellular responses but also a compensatory increase in intracellular cAMP level, which is particularly significant upon the removal of the agonist or the addition of an antagonist such as naloxone (10–12). This compensatory adenylyl cyclase activation phenomenon has been postulated to be responsible for the development of drug tolerance and dependence (13). The observed change from receptor-mediated AC inhibition to receptor-mediated AC activation reflects possible receptor signal switching. Although the exact mechanism for such signal changes has yet to be elucidated, activation of specific protein kinases and subsequent phosphorylation of AC isoforms (14, 15) and other signaling molecules (16) have been suggested to be the key for observed AC activation. Among all the protein kinases studied, involvement of protein kinase C, MAP kinase, and Raf-1 has been implicated in the activation of AC (17–19). Alternative mechanisms, such as agonist-induced receptor internalization and the increase in the constitutive activities of the receptor, also have been suggested to play a role in increased AC activity after prolonged opioid agonist treatment (20). Earlier studies also implicated the switching of the opioid receptor from G_i/G_o to G_s coupling during chronic agonist treatment (21). Regardless of the mechanism, the exact molecular events that lead to the switching of opioid receptor from an inhibitory response to a stimulatory response remain elusive.Src kinases, which are members of the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase family, have been implicated in GPCR function because several Src family members such as cSrc, Fyn, and Yes have been reported to be activated by several GPCRs, including β₂- (22) and β₃ (23)-adrenergic, M₂- (24) and M₃ (25)-muscarinic, and bradykinin receptors (26). The GPCRs that are capable of activating Src predominantly couple to G_i/o family G proteins (27). Src kinases appear to associate with, and be activated by, GPCRs themselves either through direct interaction with intracellular receptor domains or by binding to GPCR-associated proteins, such as G protein subunits or β-arrestins (27). Src kinase has been reported to be activated by κ- (28) and δ (29)-opioid receptors and regulate the c-Jun kinase and MAP kinase activities. Src kinase within the nucleus accumbens has been implicated in the rewarding effect and hyperlocomotion induced by morphine in mice (30). However, it is not clear whether the Src kinase is activated and involved in the signal transduction in AC activation after chronic opioid agonist administration.Previously we reported that the lipid raft location of the receptor and the Gα_i2 proteins are two prerequisites for the observed increase in AC activity during prolonged agonist treatment (31, 32). Because various protein kinases including Src kinases and G proteins have been shown to be enriched in lipid rafts (33), the roles of these cellular proteins in the eventual switching of opioid receptor signals from inhibition to stimulation of AC activity were examined in the current studies. We were able to demonstrate that the association with and subsequent activation of Src kinase by the μ-opioid receptor (OPRM1), which leads to eventual tyrosine phosphorylation of OPRM1, are the cellular events required for the switching of opioid receptor signaling upon chronic agonist treatment.     

ULK1��ATG13��FIP200 Complex Mediates mTOR Signaling and Is Essential for Autophagy

Autophagy is a degradative process that recycles long-lived and faulty cellular components. It is linked to many diseases and is required for normal development. ULK1, a mammalian serine/threonine protein kinase, plays a key role in the initial stages of autophagy, though the exact molecular mechanism is unknown. Here we report identification of a novel protein complex containing ULK1 and two additional protein factors, FIP200 and ATG13, all of which are essential for starvation-induced autophagy. Both FIP200 and ATG13 are critical for correct localization of ULK1 to the pre-autophagosome and stability of ULK1 protein. Additionally, we demonstrate by using both cellular experiments and a de novo in vitro reconstituted reaction that FIP200 and ATG13 can enhance ULK1 kinase activity individually but both are required for maximal stimulation. Further, we show that ATG13 and ULK1 are phosphorylated by the mTOR pathway in a nutrient starvation-regulated manner, indicating that the ULK1·ATG13·FIP200 complex acts as a node for integrating incoming autophagy signals into autophagosome biogenesis.Macroautophagy (herein referred to as autophagy) is a catabolic process whereby long-lived proteins and damaged organelles are shuttled to lysosomes for degradation. This process is conserved in all eukaryotes. Under normal growth conditions a housekeeping level of autophagy exists. Under stress, such as nutrient starvation, autophagy is strongly induced resulting in the engulfment of cytosolic components and organelles in specialized double-membrane structures termed autophagosomes. Following fusion of the outer autophagosomal membrane with lysosomes, the inner membrane and its cytoplasmic cargo are degraded and recycled (1–3). Recent work has implicated autophagy in many disease pathologies, including cancer, neurodegeneration, as well as in eliminating intracellular pathogens (4–8).The morphology of autophagy was first described in mammalian cells over 50 years ago (9). However, it is only recently through yeast genetic screens, that multiple autophagy-related (ATG) genes have been identified (10–12). The yeast ATG proteins have been classified into four major groups: the Atg1 protein kinase complex, the Vps34 phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate kinase complex, the Atg8/Atg12 conjugation systems, and the Atg9 recycling complex (13). Even though many ATG genes are now known, most of which have functional homologs in mammalian cells (14, 15), the molecular mechanism by which they sense the initial triggers and subsequently dictate autophagy-specific intracellular membrane events is far from understood.In yeast, one of the earliest autophagy-specific events is believed to involve the Atg1 protein kinase complex. Atg1 is a serine/threonine protein kinase and a key autophagy-regulator (16). Atg1 is complexed to at least two other proteins during autophagy, Atg13 and Atg17, both of which are required for normal Atg1 function and autophagosome generation (17–19). Classical signaling pathways such as the cAMP-dependent kinase (PKA) pathway or the Tor kinase pathway appear to converge upon this complex, placing Atg1 at an early stage during autophagosome biogenesis (20–22). Atg1 phosphorylation by PKA blocks its association with the forming autophagosome (21), while the Tor pathway hyperphosphorylates Atg13 causing a reduced affinity of Atg13 for Atg1, resulting in repression of autophagy (17, 19). In contrast, nutrient starvation or inhibition of Tor leads to dephosphorylation of Atg13 thus increased Atg1 complex formation and kinase activity, resulting in stimulation of autophagy (19). Surprisingly, the physiological substrates of Atg1 kinase have not been identified; thus how Atg1 transduces upstream autophagic signaling is undefined. Recently, mammalian homologs of Atg1 have been identified as ULK1 and ULK2 (Unc-51-like kinase)² (23–25). ULK1 and ULK2 are ubiquitously expressed and localize to the isolation membrane, or forming autophagosome, upon nutrient starvation (25); RNAi-mediated depletion of ULK1 in HEK293 cells compromises autophagy (23, 24). The exact role of ULK1 versus ULK2 in autophagy is unclear, and it is possible some redundancy exists between the two isoforms (26).Given the conservation of autophagy from yeast to man, it is interesting to note that no mammalian counterpart to yeast Atg13 or Atg17 had been identified until very recently. The protein FIP200 (focal adhesion kinase family-interacting protein of 200 kDa) was identified as an autophagy-essential binding partner of both ULK1 and ULK2 (25), and it has been speculated that FIP200 might be the equivalent of yeast Atg17, despite low sequence similarity (25, 27).In this study, we delve deeper into the molecular regulation of ULK1 to gain a better insight into how mammalian signaling pathways affect autophagy initiation. We describe here the identification of a triple complex consisting of ULK1, FIP200, and the mammalian equivalent of Atg13. This complex is required not only for localization of ULK1 to the isolation membrane but also for maximal kinase activity. In addition, both ATG13 and ULK1 are kinase substrates in the mTOR pathway and thus might function to sense nutrient starvation. Therefore, this study defines the role of mammalian ULK1-ATG13-FIP200 complex in mediating the initial autophagic triggers and to transduce the signal to the core autophagic machinery.     

N-Glycosylation of the I-like Domain of ��1 Integrin Is Essential for ��1 Integrin Expression and Biological Function: IDENTIFICATION OF THE MINIMAL N-GLYCOSYLATION REQUIREMENT FOR ��5��1*

N-Glycosylation of integrin α5β1 plays a crucial role in cell spreading, cell migration, ligand binding, and dimer formation, but the detailed mechanisms by which N-glycosylation mediates these functions remain unclear. In a previous study, we showed that three potential N-glycosylation sites (α5S3–5) on the β-propeller of the α5 subunit are essential to the functional expression of the subunit. In particular, site 5 (α5S5) is the most important for its expression on the cell surface. In this study, the function of the N-glycans on the integrin β1 subunit was investigated using sequential site-directed mutagenesis to remove the combined putative N-glycosylation sites. Removal of the N-glycosylation sites on the I-like domain of the β1 subunit (i.e. the Δ4-6 mutant) decreased both the level of expression and heterodimeric formation, resulting in inhibition of cell spreading. Interestingly, cell spreading was observed only when the β1 subunit possessed these three N-glycosylation sites (i.e. the S4-6 mutant). Furthermore, the S4-6 mutant could form heterodimers with either α5S3-5 or α5S5 mutant of the α5 subunit. Taken together, the results of the present study reveal for the first time that N-glycosylation of the I-like domain of the β1 subunit is essential to both the heterodimer formation and biological function of the subunit. Moreover, because the α5S3-5/β1S4-6 mutant represents the minimal N-glycosylation required for functional expression of the β1 subunit, it might also be useful for the study of molecular structures.Integrin is a heterodimeric glycoprotein that consists of both an α and a β subunit (1). The interaction between integrin and the extracellular matrix is essential to both physiologic and pathologic events, such as cell migration, development, cell viability, immune homeostasis, and tumorigenesis (2, 3). Among the integrin superfamily, β1 integrin can combine with 12 distinct α subunits (α1–11, αv) to form heterodimers, thereby acquiring a wide variety of ligand specificity (1, 4). Integrins are thought to be regulated by inside-out signaling mechanisms that provoke conformational changes, which modulate the affinity of integrin for the ligand (5). However, an increasing body of evidence suggests that cell-surface carbohydrates mediate a variety of interactions between integrin and its extracellular environment, thereby affecting integrin activity and possibly tumor metastasis as well (6–8).Guo et al. (9) reported that an increase in β1–6-GlcNAc sugar chains on the integrin β1 subunit stimulated cell migration. In addition, elevated sialylation of the β1 subunit, because of Ras-induced STGal-I transferase activity, also induced cell migration (10, 11). Conversely, cell migration and spreading were reduced by the addition of a bisecting GlcNAc, which is a product of N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnT-III),² to the α5β1 and α3β1 integrins (12, 13). Alterations of N-glycans on integrins might also regulate their cis interactions with membrane-associated proteins, including the epidermal growth factor receptor, the galectin family, and the tetraspanin family of proteins (14–19).In addition to the positive and negative regulatory effects of N-glycan, several research groups have reported that N-glycans must be present on integrin α5β1 for the αβ heterodimer formation and proper integrin-matrix interactions. Consistent with this hypothesis, in the presence of the glycosylation inhibitor, tunicamycin, normal integrin-substrate binding and transport to the cell surface are inhibited (20). Moreover, treatment of purified integrin with N-glycosidase F blocked both the inherent association of the subunits and the interaction between integrin and fibronectin (FN) (21). These results suggest that N-glycosylation is essential to the functional expression of α5β1. However, because integrin α5β1 contains 26 potential N-linked glycosylation sites, 14 in the α subunit and 12 in the β subunit, identification of the sites that are essential to its biological functions is key to understanding the molecular mechanisms by which N-glycans alter integrin function. Recently, our group determined that N-glycosylation of the β-propeller domain on the α5 subunit is essential to both heterodimerization and biological functions of the subunit. Furthermore, we determined that sites 3–5 are the most important sites for α5 subunit-mediated cell spreading and migration on FN (22). The purpose of this study was to clarify the roles of N-glycosylation of the β1 subunit. Therefore, we performed combined substitutions in the putative N-glycosylation sites by replacement of asparagine residues with glutamine residues. We subsequently introduced these mutated genes into β1-deficient epithelial cells (GE11). The results of these mutation experiments revealed that the N-glycosylation sites on the I-like domain of the β1 subunit, sites number 4–6 (S4-6), are essential to both heterodimer formation and biological functions, such as cell spreading.     

Insulin Resistance in Striated Muscle-specific Integrin Receptor ��1-deficient Mice

Integrin receptor plays key roles in mediating both inside-out and outside-in signaling between cells and the extracellular matrix. We have observed that the tissue-specific loss of the integrin β1 subunit in striated muscle results in a near complete loss of integrin β1 subunit protein expression concomitant with a loss of talin and to a lesser extent, a reduction in F-actin content. Muscle-specific integrin β1-deficient mice had no significant difference in food intake, weight gain, fasting glucose, and insulin levels with their littermate controls. However, dynamic analysis of glucose homeostasis using euglycemichyperinsulinemic clamps demonstrated a 44 and 48% reduction of insulin-stimulated glucose infusion rate and glucose clearance, respectively. The whole body insulin resistance resulted from a specific inhibition of skeletal muscle glucose uptake and glycogen synthesis without any significant effect on the insulin suppression of hepatic glucose output or insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in adipose tissue. The reduction in skeletal muscle insulin responsiveness occurred without any change in GLUT4 protein expression levels but was associated with an impairment of the insulin-stimulated protein kinase B/Akt serine 473 phosphorylation but not threonine 308. The inhibition of insulin-stimulated serine 473 phosphorylation occurred concomitantly with a decrease in integrin-linked kinase expression but with no change in the mTOR·Rictor·LST8 complex (mTORC2). These data demonstrate an in vivo crucial role of integrin β1 signaling events in mediating cross-talk to that of insulin action.Integrin receptors are a large family of integral membrane proteins composed of a single α and β subunit assembled into a heterodimeric complex. There are 19 α and 8 β mammalian subunit isoforms that combine to form 25 distinct α,β heterodimeric receptors (1-5). These receptors play multiple critical roles in conveying extracellular signals to intracellular responses (outside-in signaling) as well as altering extracellular matrix interactions based upon intracellular changes (inside-out signaling). Despite the large overall number of integrin receptor complexes, skeletal muscle integrin receptors are limited to seven α subunit subtypes (α1, α3, α4, α5, α6, α7, and αν subunits), all associated with the β1 integrin subunit (6, 7).Several studies have suggested an important cross-talk between extracellular matrix and insulin signaling. For example, engagement of β1 subunit containing integrin receptors was observed to increase insulin-stimulated insulin receptor substrate (IRS)² phosphorylation, IRS-associated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and activation of protein kinase B/Akt (8-11). Integrin receptor regulation of focal adhesion kinase was reported to modulate insulin stimulation of glycogen synthesis, glucose transport, and cytoskeleton organization in cultured hepatocytes and myoblasts (12, 13). Similarly, the integrin-linked kinase (ILK) was suggested to function as one of several potential upstream kinases that phosphorylate and activate Akt (14-18). In this regard small interfering RNA gene silencing of ILK in fibroblasts and conditional ILK gene knockouts in macrophages resulted in a near complete inhibition of insulin-stimulated Akt serine 473 (Ser-473) phosphorylation concomitant with an inhibition of Akt activity and phosphorylation of Akt downstream targets (19). However, a complex composed of mTOR·Rictor·LST8 (termed mTORC2) has been identified in several other studies as the Akt Ser-473 kinase (20, 21). In addition to Ser-473, Akt protein kinase activation also requires phosphorylation on threonine 308 Thr-30 by phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase, PDK1 (22-24).In vivo, skeletal muscle is the primary tissue responsible for postprandial (insulin-stimulated) glucose disposal that results from the activation of signaling pathways leading to the translocation of the insulin-responsive glucose transporter, GLUT4, from intracellular sites to the cell surface membranes (25, 26). Dysregulation of any step of this process in skeletal muscle results in a state of insulin resistance, thereby predisposing an individual for the development of diabetes (27-33). Although studies described above have utilized a variety of tissue culture cell systems to address the potential involvement of integrin receptor signaling in insulin action, to date there has not been any investigation of integrin function on insulin action or glucose homeostasis in vivo. To address this issue, we have taken advantage of Cre-LoxP technology to inactivate the β1 integrin receptor subunit gene in striated muscle. We have observed that muscle creatine kinase-specific integrin β1 knock-out (MCKItgβ1 KO) mice display a reduction of insulin-stimulated glucose infusion rate and glucose clearance. The impairment of insulin-stimulated skeletal muscle glucose uptake and glycogen synthesis resulted from a decrease in Akt Ser-473 phosphorylation concomitant with a marked reduction in ILK expression. Together, these data demonstrate an important cross-talk between integrin receptor function and insulin action and suggests that ILK may function as an Akt Ser-473 kinase in skeletal muscle.     

Copper��Dopamine Complex Induces Mitochondrial Autophagy Preceding Caspase-independent Apoptotic Cell Death

Parkinsonism is one of the major neurological symptoms in Wilson disease, and young workers who worked in the copper smelting industry also developed Parkinsonism. We have reported the specific neurotoxic action of copper·dopamine complex in neurons with dopamine uptake. Copper·dopamine complex (100 μm) induces cell death in RCSN-3 cells by disrupting the cellular redox state, as demonstrated by a 1.9-fold increase in oxidized glutathione levels and a 56% cell death inhibition in the presence of 500 μm ascorbic acid; disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential with a spherical shape and well preserved morphology determined by transmission electron microscopy; inhibition (72%, p < 0.001) of phosphatidylserine externalization with 5 μm cyclosporine A; lack of caspase-3 activation; formation of autophagic vacuoles containing mitochondria after 2 h; transfection of cells with green fluorescent protein-light chain 3 plasmid showing that 68% of cells presented autophagosome vacuoles; colocalization of positive staining for green fluorescent protein-light chain 3 and Rhod-2AM, a selective indicator of mitochondrial calcium; and DNA laddering after 12-h incubation. These results suggest that the copper·dopamine complex induces mitochondrial autophagy followed by caspase-3-independent apoptotic cell death. However, a different cell death mechanism was observed when 100 μm copper·dopamine complex was incubated in the presence of 100 μm dicoumarol, an inhibitor of NAD(P)H quinone:oxidoreductase (EC 1.6.99.2, also known as DT-diaphorase and NQ01), because a more extensive and rapid cell death was observed. In addition, cyclosporine A had no effect on phosphatidylserine externalization, significant portions of compact chromatin were observed within a vacuolated nuclear membrane, DNA laddering was less pronounced, the mitochondria morphology was more affected, and the number of cells with autophagic vacuoles was a near 4-fold less.A possible role of copper in the neurodegeneration of dopaminergic neurons is supported by the fact that patients with neurological Wilson disease, a copper deposition disorder, display a number of extrapyramidal motor symptoms, including Parkinsonism. The cerebral manifestations in neurological Wilson disease are expressed as bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, dyskinesia, and dysarthria (1). It has been proposed that neurological Wilson disease can be assigned to the group of secondary Parkinsonian syndromes (2). Interestingly, young workers who worked in the copper smelting industry also developed Parkinsonism (3).Studies performed in rats showed copper (Cu²⁺)-induced degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the nigrostriatal system. Likewise, it was described that copper neurotoxicity in rat substantia nigra and striatum is dependent on NAD(P)H dehydrogenase inhibition (4, 5). All of these results support a possible role for copper in the neurodegeneration of dopaminergic neurons.The general mechanism of toxicity, induced by the reduced form of copper (Cu⁺) catalyzing the formation of hydroxyl radicals in the presence of hydrogen peroxide through the Fenton reaction, cannot explain the specific degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in Parkinsonism induced in neurological Wilson disease, or in miners working in the copper smelting industry. The selective action of copper can be explained by the ability of copper to form a complex with dopamine, allowing this metal to be transported by cells that have the ability to take up dopamine (6). This specific neurotoxic action of copper in neurons with dopamine uptake is dependent on (i) the ability of copper to form a complex with dopamine (Cu·DA)² (6, 7), (ii) uptake of Cu·DA complex by dopamine transporters, (iii) oxidation of dopamine to aminochrome, and (iv) one-electron reduction of aminochrome by inhibiting NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (6). These findings may explain the selective neurotoxic action of copper in the brain, but they do not explain the cell death mechanism.Currently, cell death is divided into three categories: apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis. At the current time, only apoptosis and autophagic cell death are generally accepted as being legitimate forms of programmed cell death. Alternative models of cell death have therefore been proposed, including para-apoptosis, mitotic catastrophe, oncosis, and pyroptosis (8–12). Necrosis is characterized mostly by the absence of caspase activation, cytochrome c release, and DNA oligonucleosomal fragmentation. Apoptotic cells are characterized by the formation of blebs, chromatin condensation, DNA oligonucleosomal fragmentation, and exposure of phosphatidylserine on the external membrane. This mode of cell death can be dependent or independent of activation of caspases (13). On the other hand, autophagy can be distinguished from apoptosis by sequestration of bulk cytoplasm and organelles in double or multimembrane autophagic vacuoles that then fuse with the lysosomal system. Some of these described mechanisms are related to neurological diseases such as Parkinson disease (14, 15). Cells can use different methods to activate their own destruction, and more than one death program may be activated at the same time (16, 17).The purpose of this study was to examine the Cu·DA complex-induced cell death mechanism in RCSN-3 cells, a cell line that expresses dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin transporters (18, 19).