A new approach utilizing real-time qPCR to detect in vitro base excision repair

DNA lesions in mammalian cells may be induced by reactive oxygen species, alkylation, and ionizing radiation. This damage can then be repaired via the base excision repair (BER) pathway, which includes single strand break repair (SSBR). Thus, the BER (SSBR) pathway plays a critical role in maintaining genomic integrity, and may help us to better understand the mechanisms of aging, tumor formation, and degenerative diseases. AP site (apurinic/apyrimidinic site) or damaged base excision, nucleotide insertion and ligation are included in the BER (SSBR) pathway, which are facilitated by different enzymes at each step. Most previous in vitro BER studies have used modified radiolabeled ³²P oligonucleotide substrates. Which is a very conventional method for in vitro BER assay. However, the use of radioactive isotope material was limited in various laboratories which are unable to handle radioactive hazard. In this study, we developed a novel technique using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) to quantify BER activity in in vitro assays. Single strand breaks, DNA ligase activity, and glycosylase activity were detected to establish the feasibility and advantages of this qPCR technique for in vitro BER profiling.     

DNA damage levels and biochemical repair capacities associated with XRCC1 deficiency

Base excision repair (BER) is the major corrective pathway for most spontaneous, oxidative, and alkylation DNA base and sugar damage. X-ray cross-complementing 1 (XRCC1) has been suggested to function at nearly every step of this repair process, primarily through direct protein-protein interactions. Using whole cell extract (WCE) repair assays and DNA damage measurement techniques, we examined systematically the quantitative contribution of XRCC1 to specific biochemical steps of BER and single-strand break repair (SSBR). Our studies reveal that XRCC1-deficient Chinese hamster ovary WCEs exhibit normal base excision activity for 8-oxoguanine (8-OH-dG), 5-hydroxycytosine, ethenoadenine, and uracil lesions. Moreover, XRCC1 mutant EM9 cells possess steady-state levels of endogenous 8-OH-dG base damage similar to those of their wild-type counterparts. Abasic site incision activity was found to be normal in XRCC1-deficient cell extracts, as were the levels of abasic sites in isolated chromosomal DNA from mutant cells. While one- and five-nucleotide gap filling was not affected by XRCC1 status, a significant approximately 2-4-fold reduction in nick ligation activity was observed in EM9 WCEs. Our results herein suggest that the primary biochemical defect associated with XRCC1 deficiency is in the ligation step of BER/SSBR, and that XRCC1 plays no significant role in endogenous base damage and abasic site repair, or in promoting the polymerase gap-filling step.     

Light and dark in chromatin repair: repair of UV-induced DNA lesions by photolyase and nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) and DNA repair by photolyase in the presence of light (photoreactivation) are the major pathways to remove UV-induced DNA lesions from the genome, thereby preventing mutagenesis and cell death. Photoreactivation was found in many prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms, but not in mammals, while NER seems to be universally distributed. Since packaging of eukaryotic DNA in nucleosomes and higher order chromatin structures affects DNA structure and accessibility, damage formation and repair are coupled intimately to structural and dynamic properties of chromatin. Here, I review recent progress in the study of repair of chromatin and transcribed genes. Photoreactivation and NER are discussed as examples of how an individual enzyme and a complex repair pathway, respectively, access DNA lesions in chromatin and how these two repair processes fulfil complementary roles in removal of UV lesions. These repair pathways provide insight into the structural and dynamic properties of chromatin and suggest how other DNA repair processes could work in chromatin.     

XRCC1 interacts with the p58 subunit of DNA Pol α-primase and may coordinate DNA repair and replication during S phase

Repair of single-stranded DNA breaks before DNA replication is critical in maintaining genomic stability; however, how cells deal with these lesions during S phase is not clear. Using combined approaches of proteomics and in vitro and in vivo protein–protein interaction, we identified the p58 subunit of DNA Pol α-primase as a new binding partner of XRCC1, a key protein of the single strand break repair (SSBR) complex. In vitro experiments reveal that the binding of poly(ADP-ribose) to p58 inhibits primase activity by competition with its DNA binding property. Overexpression of the XRCC1-BRCT1 domain in HeLa cells induces poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis, PARP-1 and XRCC1-BRCT1 poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation and a strong S phase delay in the presence of DNA damage. Addition of recombinant XRCC1-BRCT1 to Xenopus egg extracts slows down DNA synthesis and inhibits the binding of PCNA, but not MCM2 to alkylated chromatin, thus indicating interference with the assembly of functional replication forks. Altogether these results suggest a critical role for XRCC1 in connecting the SSBR machinery with the replication fork to halt DNA synthesis in response to DNA damage.     

PARP inhibition versus PARP-1 silencing: different outcomes in terms of single-strand break repair and radiation susceptibility

The consequences of PARP-1 disruption or inhibition on DNA single-strand break repair (SSBR) and radio-induced lethality were determined in synchronized, isogenic HeLa cells stably silenced or not for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) (PARP-1(KD)) or XRCC1 (XRCC1(KD)). PARP-1 inhibition prevented XRCC1-YFP recruitment at sites of 405 nm laser micro irradiation, slowed SSBR 10-fold and triggered the accumulation of large persistent foci of GFP-PARP-1 and GFP-PCNA at photo damaged sites. These aggregates are presumed to hinder the recruitment of other effectors of the base excision repair (BER) pathway. PARP-1 silencing also prevented XRCC1-YFP recruitment but did not lengthen the lifetime of GFP-PCNA foci. Moreover, PARP-1(KD) and XRCC1(KD) cells in S phase completed SSBR as rapidly as controls, while SSBR was delayed in G1. Taken together, the data demonstrate that a PARP-1- and XRCC1-independent SSBR pathway operates when the short patch repair branch of the BER is deficient. Long patch repair is the likely mechanism, as GFP-PCNA recruitment at photo-damaged sites was normal in PARP-1(KD) cells. PARP-1 silencing elicited hyper-radiosensitivity, while radiosensitization by a PARP inhibitor reportedly occurs only in those cells treated in S phase. PARP-1 inhibition and deletion thus have different outcomes in terms of SSBR and radiosensitivity.     

A unified view of base excision repair: lesion-dependent protein complexes regulated by post-translational modification

Base excision repair (BER) proteins act upon a significantly broad spectrum of DNA lesions that result from endogenous and exogenous sources. Multiple sub-pathways of BER (short-path or long-patch) and newly designated DNA repair pathways (e.g., SSBR and NIR) that utilize BER proteins complicate any comprehensive understanding of BER and its role in genome maintenance, chemotherapeutic response, neuro-degeneration, cancer or aging. Herein, we propose a unified model of BER, comprised of three functional processes: Lesion Recognition/Strand Scission, Gap Tailoring and DNA Synthesis/Ligation, each represented by one or more multi-protein complexes and coordinated via the XRCC1/DNA Ligase III and PARP1 scaffold proteins. BER therefore may be represented by a series of repair complexes that assemble at the site of the DNA lesion and mediates repair in a coordinated fashion involving protein-protein interactions that dictate subsequent steps or sub-pathway choice. Complex formation is influenced by post-translational protein modifications that arise from the cellular state or the DNA damage response, providing an increase in specificity and efficiency to the BER pathway. In this review, we have summarized the reported BER protein-protein interactions and protein post-translational modifications and discuss the impact on DNA repair capacity and complex formation.     

DNA single-strand break repair and spinocerebellar ataxia

DNA single-strand break repair (SSBR) is critical for the survival and genetic stability of mammalian cells. Three papers have recently associated mutations in putative human SSBR genes with hereditary spinocerebellar ataxia. The emerging links between SSBR and neurodegenerative disorders are discussed.     

E2F1 is involved in DNA single-strand break repair through cell-cycle-dependent upregulation of XRCC1 expression

The X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (XRCC1) protein is involved in DNA base excision repair and its expression varies during the cell cycle. Although studies have demonstrated that rapid XRCC1-dependent single-strand break repair (SSBR) takes place specifically during S/G(2) phases, it remains unclear how it is regulated during the cell cycle. We found that XRCC1 is a direct regulatory target of E2F1 and further investigated the role of XRCC1 in DNA repair during the cell cycle. Saos2 primary osteosarcoma cells stably transfected with inducible E2F1-wt or mutant E2F1-132E were treated with hydroxurea (HU) for 36h and were subsequently withdrawn HU for 2-24h to test whether cell-cycle-dependent DNA SSBR requires E2F1-mediated upregulation of XRCC1. We found that SSBR activity, as determined using a qPCR-base method, was correlated with E2F1 levels at different phases of the cell cycle. XRCC1-positive (AA8) and negative (EM9) CHO cells were used to demonstrate that the alterations in SSBR were mediated by XRCC1. The results indicate that E2F1-mediated regulation of XRCC1 is required for cell-cycle-dependent SSBR predominantly in G(1)/S phases. Our observations have provided new mechanistic insight for understanding the role of E2F1 in the maintenance of genomic stability and cell survival during the cell cycle. The regulation of XRCC1 by E2F1 during cell-cycle-dependent SSBR might be an important aspect for practical consideration for resolving the problem of drug resistance in tumor chemotherapies.     

The Arg280His polymorphism in X-ray repair cross-complementing gene 1 impairs DNA repair ability

The contribution of three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that substitute amino acids in the X-ray repair cross-complementing gene 1 (XRCC1) protein, Arg194Trp (R194W), Arg280His (R280H), and Arg399Gln (R399Q), to the risk of various types of cancers has been extensively investigated by epidemiological researches. To investigate whether two of these polymorphisms directly influence their repair ability, we established Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) EM9 cell lines transfected with XRCC1(WT), XRCC1(R194W), or XRCC1(R280H) genes and analyzed the DNA repair ability of these cells. The EM9 cells that lack functional XRCC1 proteins exhibit severe sensitivity to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). Introduction of the human XRCC1(WT) and XRCC1(R194W) gene to EM9 cells restored the MMS sensitivity to the same level as the AA8 cells, a parental cell line. However, introduction of the XRCC1(R280H) gene partially restored the MMS sensitivity, resulting in a 1.7- to 1.9-fold higher sensitivity to MMS compared with XRCC1(WT) and XRCC1(R194W) cells at the LD(50) value. The alkaline comet assay determined diminished base excision repair/single strand break repair (BER/SSBR) efficiency in XRCC1(R280H) cells as observed in EM9 cells. In addition, the amount of intracellular NAD(P)H decreased in XRCC1(R280H) cells after MMS treatment. Indirect immunofluorescence staining of the XRCC1 protein showed an intense increase in the signals and clear foci of XRCC1 in the nuclei of the XRCC1(WT) cells, but a faint increase in the XRCC1(R280H) cells, after MMS exposure. These results suggest that the XRCC1(R280H) variant protein is defective in its efficient localization to a damaged site in the chromosome, thereby reducing the cellular BER/SSBR efficiency.     

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases in double-strand break repair: Focus on PARP1, PARP2 and PARP3

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation) is a post-translational modification of proteins catalysed by Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARP). A wealth of recent advances in the biochemical and functional characterization of the DNA-dependent PARP family members have highlighted their key contribution in the DNA damage response network, the best characterized being the role of PARP1 and PARP2 in the resolution of single-strand breaks as part of the BER/SSBR process. How PARylation contributes to the repair of double-strand breaks is less well defined but has become recently the subject of significant research in the field. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge concerning the role of the DNA-activated PARP1, PARP2 and PARP3 in cellular response to double-strand breaks (DSB). In addition, we outline the biological significance of these properties in response to programmed DNA lesions formed during physiological processes such as antibody repertoire assembly and diversification.     

Role of human DNA glycosylase Nei-like 2 (NEIL2) and single strand break repair protein polynucleotide kinase 3'-phosphatase in maintenance of mitochondrial genome

The repair of reactive oxygen species-induced base lesions and single strand breaks (SSBs) in the nuclear genome via the base excision (BER) and SSB repair (SSBR) pathways, respectively, is well characterize, and important for maintaining genomic integrity. However, the role of mitochondrial (mt) BER and SSBR proteins in mt genome maintenance is not completely clear. Here we show the presence of the oxidized base-specific DNA glycosylase Nei-like 2 (NEIL2) and the DNA end-processing enzyme polynucleotide kinase 3'-phosphatase (PNKP) in purified human mitochondrial extracts (MEs). Confocal microscopy revealed co-localization of PNKP and NEIL2 with the mitochondrion-specific protein cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (MT-CO2). Further, chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis showed association of NEIL2 and PNKP with the mitochondrial genes MT-CO2 and MT-CO3 (cytochrome c oxidase subunit 3); importantly, both enzymes also associated with the mitochondrion-specific DNA polymerase γ. In cell association of NEIL2 and PNKP with polymerase γ was further confirmed by proximity ligation assays. PNKP-depleted ME showed a significant decrease in both BER and SSBR activities, and PNKP was found to be the major 3'-phosphatase in human ME. Furthermore, individual depletion of NEIL2 and PNKP in human HEK293 cells caused increased levels of oxidized bases and SSBs in the mt genome, respectively. Taken together, these studies demonstrate the critical role of NEIL2 and PNKP in maintenance of the mammalian mitochondrial genome.     

Distinct spatiotemporal patterns and PARP dependence of XRCC1 recruitment to single-strand break and base excision repair

Single-strand break repair (SSBR) and base excision repair (BER) of modified bases and abasic sites share several players. Among them is XRCC1, an essential scaffold protein with no enzymatic activity, required for the coordination of both pathways. XRCC1 is recruited to SSBR by PARP-1, responsible for the initial recognition of the break. The recruitment of XRCC1 to BER is still poorly understood. Here we show by using both local and global induction of oxidative DNA base damage that XRCC1 participation in BER complexes can be distinguished from that in SSBR by several criteria. We show first that XRCC1 recruitment to BER is independent of PARP. Second, unlike SSBR complexes that are assembled within minutes after global damage induction, XRCC1 is detected later in BER patches, with kinetics consistent with the repair of oxidized bases. Third, while XRCC1-containing foci associated with SSBR are formed both in eu- and heterochromatin domains, BER complexes are assembled in patches that are essentially excluded from heterochromatin and where the oxidized bases are detected.     

Genomic approaches to DNA repair and mutagenesis

DNA damage is a constant threat to cells, causing cytotoxicity as well as inducing genetic alterations. The steady-state abundance of DNA lesions in a cell is minimized by a variety of DNA repair mechanisms, including DNA strand break repair, mismatch repair, nucleotide excision repair, base excision repair, and ribonucleotide excision repair. The efficiencies and mechanisms by which these pathways remove damage from chromosomes have been primarily characterized by investigating the processing of lesions at defined genomic loci, among bulk genomic DNA, on episomal DNA constructs, or using in vitro substrates. However, the structure of a chromosome is heterogeneous, consisting of heavily protein-bound heterochromatic regions, open regulatory regions, actively transcribed genes, and even areas of transient single stranded DNA. Consequently, DNA repair pathways function in a much more diverse set of chromosomal contexts than can be readily assessed using previous methods. Recent efforts to develop whole genome maps of DNA damage, repair processes, and even mutations promise to greatly expand our understanding of DNA repair and mutagenesis. Here we review the current efforts to utilize whole genome maps of DNA damage and mutation to understand how different chromosomal contexts affect DNA excision repair pathways.     

Timely termination of repair DNA synthesis by ATAD5 is important in oxidative DNA damage-induced single-strand break repair

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generate oxidized bases and single-strand breaks (SSBs), which are fixed by base excision repair (BER) and SSB repair (SSBR), respectively. Although excision and repair of damaged bases have been extensively studied, the function of the sliding clamp, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), including loading/unloading, remains unclear. We report that, in addition to PCNA loading by replication factor complex C (RFC), timely PCNA unloading by the ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5 (ATAD5)-RFC–like complex is important for the repair of ROS-induced SSBs. We found that PCNA was loaded at hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂)-generated direct SSBs after the 3′-terminus was converted to the hydroxyl moiety by end-processing enzymes. However, PCNA loading rarely occurred during BER of oxidized or alkylated bases. ATAD5-depleted cells were sensitive to acute H₂O₂ treatment but not methyl methanesulfonate treatment. Unexpectedly, when PCNA remained on DNA as a result of ATAD5 depletion, H₂O₂-induced repair DNA synthesis increased in cancerous and normal cells. Based on higher H₂O₂-induced DNA breakage and SSBR protein enrichment by ATAD5 depletion, we propose that extended repair DNA synthesis increases the likelihood of DNA polymerase stalling, shown by increased PCNA monoubiquitination, and consequently, harmful nick structures are more frequent.     

XRCC1 is required for DNA single-strand break repair in human cells

The X-ray repair cross complementing 1 (XRCC1) protein is required for viability and efficient repair of DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) in rodents. XRCC1-deficient mouse or hamster cells are hypersensitive to DNA damaging agents generating SSBs and display genetic instability after such DNA damage. The presence of certain polymorphisms in the human XRCC1 gene has been associated with altered cancer risk, but the role of XRCC1 in SSB repair (SSBR) in human cells is poorly defined. To elucidate this role, we used RNA interference to modulate XRCC1 protein levels in human cell lines. A reduction in XRCC1 protein levels resulted in decreased SSBR capacity as measured by the comet assay and intracellular NAD(P)H levels, hypersensitivity to the cell killing effects of the DNA damaging agents methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), hydrogen peroxide and ionizing radiation and enhanced formation of micronuclei following exposure to MMS. Lowered XRCC1 protein levels were also associated with a significant delay in S-phase progression after exposure to MMS. These data clearly demonstrate that XRCC1 is required for efficient SSBR and genomic stability in human cells.     

Mechanism of cell killing after ionizing radiation by a dominant negative DNA polymerase beta

Several types of DNA lesion are induced after ionizing irradiation (IR) of which double strand breaks (DSBs) are expected to be the most lethal, although single strand breaks (SSBs) and DNA base damages are quantitatively in the majority. Proteins of the base excision repair (BER) pathway repair these numerous lesions. DNA polymerase beta has been identified as a crucial enzyme in BER and SSB repair (SSBR). We showed previously that inhibition of BER/SSBR by expressing a dominant negative DNA polymerase beta (polβDN) resulted in radiosensitization. We hypothesized increased kill to result from DSBs arising from unrepaired SSBs and BER intermediates. We find here higher numbers of IR-induced chromosome aberrations in polβDN expressing cells, confirming increased DSB formation. These aberrations did not result from changes in DSB induction or repair of the majority of lesions. SSB conversion to DSBs has been shown to occur during replication. We observed an increased induction of chromatid aberrations in polβDN expressing cells after IR, suggesting such a replication-dependence of secondary DSB formation. We also observed a pronounced increase of chromosomal deletions, the most likely cause of the increased kill. After H₂O₂ treatment, polβDN expression only resulted in increased chromatid (not chromosome) aberrations. Together with the lack of sensitization to H₂O₂, these data further suggest that the additional secondarily induced lethal DSBs resulted from repair attempts at complex clustered damage sites, unique to IR. Surprisingly, the polβDN induced increase in residual γH2AX foci number was unexpectedly low compared with the radiosensitization or induction of aberrations. Our data thus demonstrate the formation of secondary DSBs that are reflected by increased kill but not by residual γH2AX foci, indicating an escape from γH2AX-mediated DSB repair. In addition, we show that in the polβDN expressing cells secondary DSBs arise in a radiation-specific and partly replication-dependent manner.     

Co-ordination of DNA single strand break repair

DNA damaging agents generated as a consequence of endogenous metabolism or via exogenous factors can produce a wide variety of lesions in DNA. These include base damage, sites of base loss (abasic sites) and single strand breaks (SSBs). Moreover, reactive oxygen species (ROS) create more diversity by generating SSBs containing modified 3'-ends, such as those containing phosphate, phosphoglycolate and oxidative base damage. Ionising radiation also generates DNA base lesions in close proximity to SSBs. The majority of these non-bulky lesions in DNA are repaired by proteins involved in the base excision repair (BER) pathway. It is apparent that due to the complexity of these lesions, they may require individual subsets of BER proteins for repair. However, the mechanism unravelling the required enzymes and directing damage-specific repair of SSBs is unclear. In this review we will discuss recent studies that identify new enzymes and activities involved in the repair of SSBs containing modified ends and in particular outline the possible mechanisms involved in the co-ordinated repair of "damaged" SSBs that can not be resealed directly and require preliminary processing.     

DNA repair and chromosomal alterations

All mutagenic agents induce lesions in the cellular DNA and they are repaired efficiently by different repair mechanisms. Un-repaired and mis-repaired lesions lead to chromosomal aberrations (CAs). Depending upon the mutagenic agents involved, different DNA repair pathways, such as nucleotide excision repair (NER), base excision repair (BER), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination repair (HRR), cross-link repair (FANC), single strand annealing (SSA) etc., are operative. Following ionising radiation, DNA double strand breaks (DSBs, which are considered to be the most important leasion leading to observed biological effects) are repaired either by NHEJ and/or HRR. We have investigated the relative role of these two repair pathways leading to chromosomal aberrations using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) mutant cells deficient in one of these two repair pathwatys. NHEJ operates both in G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle, wheras HHR operates mainly in S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. In NHEJ-deficient mutant cells irradiated in G1, un-repaired double strand breaks reaching S phase are repaired (unexpectedly with a large mis-repair component) by HRR. In HRR-deficient mutant cells, un-repaired DSBs reaching S phase are repaired by NHEJ (unexpectedly with a low mis-repair component) as evidenced by the frequencies of chromatid type aberrations. Employing a similar approach, following treatment with benzo(alpha)pyrene-7,8diol-9,10epoxide (BPDE), the active metabolite of benzo(alpha)pyrene, NER and HRR seem to be the most important repair pathways protecting against chromosomal damage induced by this agent. In the case of acetaldehyde, (primary metabolite of alcohol in vivo) a DNA cross-linking agent, HRR and FANC pathways are important for protection against damage induced by this agent. Irrespective of the type of DNA lesions induced, ultimately they have to be converted to DSBs in order to give rise to CA. Therefore, both NHEJ and HRR are also involved to some extent in the origin of CA following treatment with S-dependent agents.The relative importance of different repair pathways in bestowing protection against DNA damage leading to chromosomal alterations is discussed.