Tumor‐associated macrophages (TAMs) depend on ZEB1 for their cancer‐promoting roles

Accumulation of tumor‐associated macrophages (TAMs) associates with malignant progression in cancer. However, the mechanisms that drive the pro‐tumor functions of TAMs are not fully understood. ZEB1 is best known for driving an epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) in cancer cells to promote tumor progression. However, a role for ZEB1 in macrophages and TAMs has not been studied. Here we describe that TAMs require ZEB1 for their tumor‐promoting and chemotherapy resistance functions in a mouse model of ovarian cancer. Only TAMs that expressed full levels of Zeb1 accelerated tumor growth. Mechanistically, ZEB1 expression in TAMs induced their polarization toward an F4/80^low pro‐tumor phenotype, including direct activation of Ccr2. In turn, expression of ZEB1 by TAMs induced Ccl2, Cd74, and a mesenchymal/stem‐like phenotype in cancer cells. In human ovarian carcinomas, TAM infiltration and CCR2 expression correlated with ZEB1 in tumor cells, where along with CCL2 and CD74 determined poorer prognosis. Importantly, ZEB1 in TAMs was a factor of poorer survival in human ovarian carcinomas. These data establish ZEB1 as a key factor in the tumor microenvironment and for maintaining TAMs’ tumor‐promoting functions.     

miR-200b regulates cell migration via Zeb family during mouse palate development

Palate development requires coordinating proper cellular and molecular events in palatogenesis, including the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), apoptosis, cell proliferation, and cell migration. Zeb1 and Zeb2 regulate epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) and EMT during organogenesis. While microRNA 200b (miR-200b) is known to be a negative regulator of Zeb1 and Zeb2 in cancer progression, its regulatory effects on Zeb1 and Zeb2 in palatogenesis have not yet been clarified. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the regulators of palatal development, specifically, miR-200b and the Zeb family. Expression of both Zeb1 and Zeb2 was detected in the mesenchyme of the mouse palate, while miR-200b was expressed in the medial edge epithelium. After contact with the palatal shelves, miR-200b was expressed in the palatal epithelial lining and epithelial island around the fusion region but not in the palatal mesenchyme. The function of miR-200b was examined by overexpression via a lentiviral vector in the palatal shelves. Ectopic expression of miR-200b resulted in suppression of the Zeb family, upregulation of E-cadherin, and changes in cell migration and palatal fusion. These results suggest that miR-200b plays crucial roles in cell migration and palatal fusion by regulating Zeb1 and Zeb2 as a noncoding RNA during palate development.     

ZEB1‐mediated vasculogenic mimicry formation associates with epithelial–mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell phenotypes in prostate cancer

The zinc finger E‐box‐binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) induced the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and altered ZEB1 expression could lead to aggressive and cancer stem cell (CSC) phenotypes in various cancers. Tissue specimens from 96 prostate cancer patients were collected for immunohistochemistry and CD34/periodic acid–Schiff double staining. Prostate cancer cells were subjected to ZEB1 knockdown or overexpression and assessment of the effects on vasculogenic mimicry formation in vitro and in vivo. The underlying molecular events of ZEB1‐induced vasculogenic mimicry formation in prostate cancer were then explored. The data showed that the presence of VM and high ZEB1 expression was associated with higher Gleason score, TNM stage, and lymph node and distant metastases as well as with the expression of vimentin and CD133 in prostate cancer tissues. Furthermore, ZEB1 was required for VM formation and altered expression of EMT‐related and CSC‐associated proteins in prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. ZEB1 also facilitated tumour cell migration, invasion and clonogenicity. In addition, the effects of ZEB1 in prostate cancer cells were mediated by Src signalling; that is PP2, a specific inhibitor of the Src signalling, dose dependently reduced the p‐Src⁵²⁷ level but not p‐Src⁴¹⁶ level, while ZEB1 knockdown also down‐regulated the level of p‐Src⁵²⁷ in PC3 and DU‐145 cells. PP2 treatment also significantly reduced the expression of VE‐cadherin, vimentin and CD133 in these prostate cancer cells. Src signalling mediated the effects of ZEB1 on VM formation and gene expression.     

ZEB1 Mediates Acquired Resistance to the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is one mechanism of acquired resistance to inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinases (EGFR-TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The precise mechanisms of EMT-related acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC remain unclear. We generated erlotinib-resistant HCC4006 cells (HCC4006ER) by chronic exposure of EGFR-mutant HCC4006 cells to increasing concentrations of erlotinib. HCC4006ER cells acquired an EMT phenotype and activation of the TGF-β/SMAD pathway, while lacking both T790M secondary EGFR mutation and MET gene amplification. We employed gene expression microarrays in HCC4006 and HCC4006ER cells to better understand the mechanism of acquired EGFR-TKI resistance with EMT. At the mRNA level, ZEB1 (TCF8), a known regulator of EMT, was >20-fold higher in HCC4006ER cells than in HCC4006 cells, and increased ZEB1 protein level was also detected. Furthermore, numerous ZEB1 responsive genes, such as CDH1 (E-cadherin), ST14, and vimentin, were coordinately regulated along with increased ZEB1 in HCC4006ER cells. We also identified ZEB1 overexpression and an EMT phenotype in several NSCLC cells and human NSCLC samples with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance. Short-interfering RNA against ZEB1 reversed the EMT phenotype and, importantly, restored erlotinib sensitivity in HCC4006ER cells. The level of micro-RNA-200c, which can negatively regulate ZEB1, was significantly reduced in HCC4006ER cells. Our results suggest that increased ZEB1 can drive EMT-related acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC. Attempts should be made to explore targeting ZEB1 to resensitize TKI-resistant tumors.     

Tumor‐suppressive roles of ΔNp63β‐miR‐205 axis in epithelial–mesenchymal transition of oral squamous cell carcinoma via targeting ZEB1 and ZEB2

We previously revealed that epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) was mediated by ΔNp63β, a splicing variant of ΔNp63, in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Recent studies have highlighted the involvement of microRNA (miRNA) in EMT of cancer cells, though the mechanism remains unclear. To identify miRNAs responsible for ΔNp63β‐mediated EMT, miRNA microarray analyses were performed by ΔNp63β‐overexpression in OSCC cells; SQUU‐B, which lacks ΔNp63 expression and displays EMT phenotypes. miRNAs microarray analyses revealed miR‐205 was the most up‐regulated following ΔNp63β‐overexpression. In OSCC cells, miR‐205 expression was positively associated with ΔNp63 and negatively with zinc‐finger E‐box binding homeobox (ZEB) 1 and ZEB2, potential targets of miR‐205. miR‐205 overexpression by miR‐205 mimic transfection into SQUU‐B cells led to decreasing ZEB1, ZEB2, and mesenchymal markers, increasing epithelial markers, and reducing cell motilities, suggesting inhibition of EMT phenotype. Interestingly, the results opposite to this phenomenon were obtained by transfection of miR‐205 inhibitor into OSCC cells, which express ΔNp63 and miR‐205. Furthermore, target protector analyses revealed direct regulation by miR‐205 of ZEB1 and ZEB2 expression. These results showed tumor‐suppressive roles of ΔNp63β and miR‐205 by inhibiting EMT thorough modulating ZEB1 and ZEB2 expression in OSCC.