Analysis of the Viral Elements Required in the Nuclear Import of HIV-1 DNA

HIV-1 possesses an exquisite ability to infect cells independently from their cycling status by undergoing an active phase of nuclear import through the nuclear pore. This property has been ascribed to the presence of karyophilic elements present in viral nucleoprotein complexes, such as the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a cis-acting structure present in the newly synthesized DNA, the DNA flap. However, their role in nuclear import remains controversial at best. In the present study, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the role of these elements in nuclear import in a comparison between several primary cell types, including stimulated lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. We show that despite the fact that none of these elements is absolutely required for nuclear import, disruption of the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS) clearly affects the kinetics of viral DNA entry into the nucleus. This effect is independent of the cell cycle status of the target cells and is observed in cycling as well as in nondividing primary cells, suggesting that nuclear import of viral DNA may occur similarly under both conditions. Nonetheless, this study indicates that other components are utilized along with the cPPT-CTS for an efficient entry of viral DNA into the nucleus.Lentiviruses display an exquisite ability to infect dividing and nondividing cells alike that is unequalled among Retroviridae. This property is thought to be due to the particular behavior or composition of the viral nucleoprotein complexes (NPCs) that are liberated into the cytoplasm of target cells upon virus-to-cell membrane fusion and that allow lentiviruses to traverse an intact nuclear membrane (17, 28, 29, 39, 52, 55, 67, 79). In the case of the human immunodeficiency type I virus (HIV-1), several studies over the years identified viral components of such structures with intrinsic karyophilic properties and thus perfect candidates for mediation of the passage of viral DNA (vDNA) through the nuclear pore: the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a three-stranded DNA flap, a structure present in neo-synthesized viral DNA, specified by the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS). It is clear that these elements may mediate nuclear import directly or via the recruitment of the host''s proteins, and indeed, several cellular proteins have been found to influence HIV-1 infection during nuclear import, like the karyopherin α2 Rch1 (38); importin 7 (3, 30, 93); the transportin SR-2 (13, 20); or the nucleoporins Nup98 (27), Nup358/RANBP2, and Nup153 (13, 56).More recently, the capsid protein (CA), the main structural component of viral nucleoprotein complexes at least upon their cytoplasmic entry, has also been suggested to be involved in nuclear import or in postnuclear entry steps (14, 25, 74, 90, 92). Whether this is due to a role for CA in the shaping of viral nucleoprotein complexes or to a direct interaction between CA and proteins involved in nuclear import remains at present unknown.Despite a large number of reports, no single viral or cellular element has been described as absolutely necessary or sufficient to mediate lentiviral nuclear import, and important controversies as to the experimental evidences linking these elements to this step exist. For example, MA was among the first viral protein of HIV-1 described to be involved in nuclear import, and 2 transferable nuclear localization signals (NLSs) have been described to occur at its N and C termini (40). However, despite the fact that early studies indicated that the mutation of these NLSs perturbed HIV-1 nuclear import and infection specifically in nondividing cells, such as macrophages (86), these findings failed to be confirmed in more-recent studies (23, 33, 34, 57, 65, 75).Similarly, Vpr has been implicated by several studies of the nuclear import of HIV-1 DNA (1, 10, 21, 43, 45, 47, 64, 69, 72, 73, 85). Vpr does not possess classical NLSs, yet it displays a transferable nucleophilic activity when fused to heterologous proteins (49-51, 53, 77, 81) and has been shown to line onto the nuclear envelope (32, 36, 47, 51, 58), where it can truly facilitate the passage of the viral genome into the nucleus. However, the role of Vpr in this step remains controversial, as in some instances Vpr is not even required for viral replication in nondividing cells (1, 59).Conflicting results concerning the role of IN during HIV-1 nuclear import also exist. Indeed, several transferable NLSs have been described to occur in the catalytic core and the C-terminal DNA binding domains of IN, but for some of these, initial reports of nuclear entry defects (2, 9, 22, 46, 71) were later shown to result from defects at steps other than nuclear import (60, 62, 70, 83). These reports do not exclude a role for the remaining NLSs in IN during nuclear import, and they do not exclude the possibility that IN may mediate this step by associating with components of the cellular nuclear import machinery, such as importin alpha and beta (41), importin 7 (3, 30, 93, 98), and, more recently, transportin-SR2 (20).The central DNA flap, a structure present in lentiviruses and in at least 1 yeast retroelement (44), but not in other orthoretroviruses, has also been involved in the nuclear import of viral DNA (4, 6, 7, 31, 78, 84, 95, 96), and more recently, it has been proposed to provide a signal for viral nucleoprotein complexes uncoating in the proximity of the nuclear pore, with the consequence of providing a signal for import (8). However, various studies showed an absence or weakness of nuclear entry defects in viruses devoid of the DNA flap (24, 26, 44, 61).Overall, the importance of viral factors in HIV-1 nuclear import is still unclear. The discrepancies concerning the role of MA, IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS in HIV-1 nuclear import could in part be explained by their possible redundancy. To date, only one comprehensive study analyzed the role of these four viral potentially karyophilic elements together (91). This study showed that an HIV-1 chimera where these elements were either deleted or replaced by their murine leukemia virus (MLV) counterparts was, in spite of an important infectivity defect, still able to infect cycling and cell cycle-arrested cell lines to similar efficiencies. If this result indicated that the examined viral elements of HIV-1 were dispensable for the cell cycle independence of HIV, as infections proceeded equally in cycling and arrested cells, they did not prove that they were not required in nuclear import, because chimeras displayed a severe infectivity defect that precluded their comparison with the wild type (WT).Nuclear import and cell cycle independence may not be as simply linked as previously thought. On the one hand, there has been no formal demonstration that the passage through the nuclear pore, and thus nuclear import, is restricted to nondividing cells, and for what we know, this passage may be an obligatory step in HIV infection in all cells, irrespective of their cycling status. In support of this possibility, certain mutations in viral elements of HIV affect nuclear import in dividing as well as in nondividing cells (4, 6, 7, 31, 84, 95). On the other hand, cell cycle-independent infection may be a complex phenomenon that is made possible not only by the ability of viral DNA to traverse the nuclear membrane but also by its ability to cope with pre- and postnuclear entry events, as suggested by the phenotypes of certain CA mutants (74, 92).Given that the cellular environment plays an important role during the early steps of viral infection, we chose to analyze the role of the four karyophilic viral elements of HIV-1 during infection either alone or combined in a wide comparison between cells highly susceptible to infection and more-restrictive primary cell targets of HIV-1 in vivo, such as primary blood lymphocytes (PBLs), monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), and dendritic cells (DCs).In this study, we show that an HIV-1-derived virus in which the 2 NLSs of MA are mutated and the IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS elements are removed displays no detectable nuclear import defect in HeLa cells independently of their cycling status. However, this mutant virus is partially impaired for nuclear entry in primary cells and more specifically in DCs and PBLs. We found that this partial defect is specified by the cPPT-CTS, while the 3 remaining elements seem to play no role in nuclear import. Thus, our study indicates that the central DNA flap specifies the most important role among the viral elements involved thus far in nuclear import. However, it also clearly indicates that the role played by the central DNA flap is not absolute and that its importance varies depending on the cell type, independently from the dividing status of the cell.     

Induction of Therapeutic Antibodies by Vaccination against External Loops of Tumor-Associated Viral Latent Membrane Protein

Some human herpesviruses (HHV) are etiological contributors to a wide range of malignant diseases. These HHV express latent membrane proteins (LMPs), which are type III membrane proteins consistently exposed at the cell surface in these malignancies. These LMPs have relatively large cytoplasmic domains but only short extracellular loops connecting transmembrane segments that are accessible at the surface of infected cells, but they do not elicit antibodies in the course of natural infection and tumorigenesis. We report here that conformational peptides mimicking two adjacent loops of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) LMP1 (2LS peptides) induce high-affinity antibodies with remarkable antitumor activities in mice. In active immunization experiments, LMP1-targeting 2LS vaccine conferred tumor protection in BALB/c mice. Moreover, this tumor protection is dependent upon a humoral anti-2LS immune response as demonstrated in DO11.10 (TCR-OVA) mice challenged with LMP1-expressing tumor and in SCID mice xenografted with human EBV-positive lymphoma cells. These data provide a proof of concept for 2LS immunization against short external loops of viral LMPs. This approach might possibly be extended to other infectious agents expressing type III membrane proteins.After the primary infection, some viruses, especially human herpesviruses (HHV) such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus, Kaposi''s sarcoma herpesvirus (HHV8), varicella-zoster virus, and herpes simplex virus, persist lifelong in all infected individuals, most often in an asymptomatic latent form. However, in the long term, some HHV can be involved in the emergence of malignant diseases in a small subset of infected individuals. EBV-associated lymphomas and carcinomas (22, 37), HHV8-associated Kaposi''s sarcomas (30), and human cytomegalovirus-associated glioblastomas (24) are examples of beta- and gammaherpesvirus-related human malignancies. All these malignancy-associated viruses encode type III membrane proteins which are expressed during the latent state of infection and thus can be called latent membrane proteins (LMPs). These viral LMPs (vLMPs), or “multipass” membrane proteins, appeared to be necessary for virus-driven host cell survival and/or transforming activity (1, 3, 28, 31). They are regarded by some authors as evolutionary mimics of cellular chemokine/cytokine receptors, and, like cellular receptors, they recruit numerous cytoplasmic adaptors. The several transmembrane domains of these vLMPs seem to mimic activated cellular chemokine/cytokine receptor structures and to function with versatile signaling devices, reprogramming cellular signaling networks to modulate cellular function after infection. They contribute prominently to virus survival in latently infected individuals and to virus-related human pathologies, including cancer (8, 14, 19, 34, 36). Despite expressing vLMP antigens at their membrane surface, these latently infected cells are very poor in initiating effective immune responses in infected individuals, thus facilitating viral persistence in humans (2, 17, 38). One reason for this poor immunogenicity may be the constitutive cell signaling property reported for these vLMPs in latently infected cells (3, 16, 35, 38). Consequently, unnecessary overexpression and large extracellular domains for ligand binding may facilitate vLMP immune escape (3, 35, 38). Thus, a major therapeutic approach involved the discovery of naturally active compounds or pharmacological agents that specifically block viral receptor functioning (12, 35). Compounds emerged from high-throughput screening of synthetic chemical libraries, but we still lack specific agents for vLMPs, as they cross-react with cellular chemokine/cytokine receptors and cellular signaling pathways (35). Functional antibodies (Abs) recognizing membrane proteins for anticancer therapies have recently emerged, but there are very few of these and they resulted mostly from serendipity rather than from a systematic design strategy (5). To date, LMPs as a target for a virus-specific immunotherapeutic Ab strategy have not been explored extensively. Some studies have been conducted with purified full-length LMPs from EBV, a gammaherpesvirus, but these studies failed to produce or detect Abs recognizing LMP extracellular domains (10, 20, 29). One reason for this poor immunogenicity could be the too-short extracellular structure of these LMPs, which could explain the failure of latently infected individuals to produce cytolytic Abs (21). To test this hypothesis, we used as an LMP model the EBV-encoded oncoprotein LMP1 which mimics a constitutively active tumor necrosis factor receptor-like molecule and is expressed during EBV latent infection (16). This LMP1 expression was observed in most EBV-carrying malignancies (16, 22, 37), therefore causing EBV to be classified as a class I human carcinogenic agent (11). Here, we report an original humoral approach, because Abs have unlimited diversity and are often exquisitely specific and readily produced. Indeed, to overcome the too-short extracellular size of LMP, we hypothesized that synthesis of a peptide mimicking several extracellular loops of LMP would be a successful general strategy for the development of Abs with the high-pressure liquid chromatography affinity necessary for neutralizing and cytolytic effectiveness, as described previously (4, 33a). We argue here that this new process (D. Tranchand Bunel, 28 January 2003, French patent application FR0300943; D. Tranchand Bunel, 28 July 2005, U.S. Patent Office, US069140) was rewarding, as by vaccinating mice with peptides that covered two adjacent extracellular loops of LMP1 (2LS peptides), we obtained the production of neutralizing and cytolytic high-affinity Abs. Moreover, these Abs induced by 2LS peptide vaccination appeared to confer protection of mice against the development of tumors expressing LMP1.     

Cultivation of Fastidious Bacteria by Viability Staining and Micromanipulation in a Soil Substrate Membrane System

Soil substrate membrane systems allow for microcultivation of fastidious soil bacteria as mixed microbial communities. We isolated established microcolonies from these membranes by using fluorescence viability staining and micromanipulation. This approach facilitated the recovery of diverse, novel isolates, including the recalcitrant bacterium Leifsonia xyli, a plant pathogen that has never been isolated outside the host.The majority of bacterial species have never been recovered in the laboratory (1, 14, 19, 24). In the last decade, novel cultivation approaches have successfully been used to recover “unculturables” from a diverse range of divisions (23, 25, 29). Most strategies have targeted marine environments (4, 23, 25, 32), but soil offers the potential for the investigation of vast numbers of undescribed species (20, 29). Rapid advances have been made toward culturing soil bacteria by reformulating and diluting traditional media, extending incubation times, and using alternative gelling agents (8, 21, 29).The soil substrate membrane system (SSMS) is a diffusion chamber approach that uses extracts from the soil of interest as the growth substrate, thereby mimicking the environment under investigation (12). The SSMS enriches for slow-growing oligophiles, a proportion of which are subsequently capable of growing on complex media (23, 25, 27, 30, 32). However, the SSMS results in mixed microbial communities, with the consequent difficulty in isolation of individual microcolonies for further characterization (10).Micromanipulation has been widely used for the isolation of specific cell morphotypes for downstream applications in molecular diagnostics or proteomics (5, 15). This simple technology offers the opportunity to select established microcolonies of a specific morphotype from the SSMS when combined with fluorescence visualization (3, 11). Here, we have combined the SSMS, fluorescence viability staining, and advanced micromanipulation for targeted isolation of viable, microcolony-forming soil bacteria.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Novel Approach to the Formulation of an Epstein-Barr Virus Antigen-Based Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Vaccine

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with several malignant diseases including nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), a common neoplasm throughout southeast Asia. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy can achieve remission, but a reemergence of disease is not uncommon. Therefore, there is a need for specific therapies that target the tumor through the recognition of EBV antigens. In NPC, latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) and LMP2 offer the best opportunity for specific targeting since they are typically expressed and T-cell determinants in each of these proteins have been defined. We have attempted to maximize the opportunity of incorporating every possible CD4 and CD8 determinant in a single formulation. We have achieved this by generating a scrambled protein incorporating random overlapping peptide sets from EBNA1, LMP1, and LMP2, which was then inserted into a replication-deficient strain of adenovirus (adenovirus scrambled antigen vaccine [Ad-SAVINE]). This report describes the construction of this Ad-SAVINE construct, its utility in generating LMP1 and LMP2 responses in healthy individuals as well as NPC patients, and its capacity to define new epitopes. This formulation could have a role in NPC immunotherapy for all ethnic groups since it has the potential to activate all possible CD4 and CD8 responses within EBNA1 and LMPs.Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a member of the herpesvirus family and is one of the most common human viruses. It occurs worldwide, and most people become infected with the virus sometime during their lives. EBV is associated with a range of neoplasms. These include various B- and T-cell non-Hodgkin''s lymphomas such as posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), Hodgkin''s lymphoma (HL), and several lymphoepithelioma-like carcinomas, of which nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is the archetype (1). The association of the virus with these malignancies and its oncogenic potential have been well established (19).Worldwide, NPC is characterized epidemiologically by foci of relatively high endemicity in certain geographic regions including southern China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, the Philippines, Singapore, Vietnam, Kenya, Tunisia, Sudan, and Uganda. The reason for the focal distribution of NPC is uncertain, although genetics and environmental factors have been suggested to be causes (14, 49).Currently, the mainstay for the treatment of NPC is radiation and chemotherapy. Indeed, this treatment is frequently successful when the extent of the tumor is small and confined. However, when disease is advanced at diagnosis and where metastatic spread has become apparent, more radical treatments may need to be adopted, including surgery. In either case, all these treatments are associated with severe short- and long-term side effects including secondary malignancies (16). Hence, there is a need for specific therapies that target the tumor itself rather than therapies that are associated with the destruction of normal tissue.Virus-associated malignancies offer a distinct advantage in this regard since therapy can be directed specifically toward viral proteins expressed in the tumor, thus avoiding collateral damage to normal tissue. This has been dramatically demonstrated in the case of PTLD, where the adoptive transfer of EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) activated in vitro by using autologous lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) has resulted in a resolution of disease with a very low frequency of side effects (9, 18, 40). In this case, it is likely that the effector cells infused into these patients are directed mainly toward the dominant EBV nuclear antigen 3A (EBNA3A), EBNA3B, and EBNA3C. The concept of immunological intervention as a treatment option for NPC is greatly enhanced by a range of previously reported studies that indicated the presence of transport-associated proteins (TAP1 and TAP2) and major histocompatibility complex class I and class II in NPC (23, 37, 42, 48), all of which are required for efficient CTL recognition. In NPC, EBNA1, latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), and LMP2 offer the best opportunity for specific targeting since these are the only EBV proteins expressed in this malignancy. This is particularly so in the case of immunotherapy since defined CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell determinants in each of these proteins have been defined (12, 15, 20, 31). However, the CTL response in the case of the LMPs is relatively weak (particularly LMP1), and the glycine-alanine repeat sequence within EBNA1 may affect immunological processing (29), although this may not be the absolute barrier that was first hypothesized (46). Recent studies have provided some encouragement that immunotherapeutic intervention may be a realistic treatment option for NPC (4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 30, 43, 45). For example, Straathof et al. (43) and Comoli et al. (10) adoptively transferred effector cells expanded in vitro by using LCLs to activate CTLs in patients with advanced NPC, resulting in some cases in the resolution of disease, although in other cases, efficacy was limited and transient (3). Those studies, however, have provided a promising hint that the immunotherapeutic control of NPC might be feasible.Indeed, recent studies have shown that multiple human leukocyte antigen (HLA) A2-restricted LMP1 CTL epitopes, when used as a polyepitope vaccine in a poxvirus vector, efficiently induced a strong CTL response, and this response could reverse the outgrowth of LMP1-expressing tumors in HLA-A2/Kb mice (13). The poxvirus-based LMP1-polyepitope vaccine tested in these studies contained only HLA A2-restricted epitopes, and targeting just one HLA allele will not be suitable for all ethnic groups. If a CTL-based therapy for NPC is to be universally applicable, the target epitopes must bind to a range of HLA alleles preferably present at a high frequency in patient populations and include determinants irrespective of whether they have previously been defined.It is likely that the essential difference between the very successful treatment of patients with PTLD and the partial success in the case of NPC is that in the former case, immunodominant targets are available, while in the latter case, only relatively weak responses are seen even for healthy individuals. The present communication has arisen in an attempt to maximize the possibility of activating a response toward the three proteins present in NPC rather than skewing the effector population toward the immunodominant EBNA3A, -B, and -C proteins. We have achieved this by generating a “scrambled-antigen vaccine” (referred to as SAVINE) incorporating random overlapping peptide sets from EBNA1, LMP1, and LMP2. This SAVINE has been incorporated into a replication-deficient adenovirus (Ad5/F35) as a 6.9-kb insert (Ad-SAVINE). An important feature of the Ad-SAVINE strategy is that it provides a platform for the activation of all possible immunological determinants (including helper cells and CTLs) within EBNA1, LMP1, and LMP2 and should be applicable to all populations for which NPC is endemic. This report describes the construction of this Ad-SAVINE construct and its utility in generating LMP1 and LMP2 responses from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy individuals and NPC patients.     

Heavily Isotype-Dependent Protective Activities of Human Antibodies against Vaccinia Virus Extracellular Virion Antigen B5

Antibodies against the extracellular virion (EV or EEV) form of vaccinia virus are an important component of protective immunity in animal models and likely contribute to the protection of immunized humans against poxviruses. Using fully human monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), we now have shown that the protective attributes of the human anti-B5 antibody response to the smallpox vaccine (vaccinia virus) are heavily dependent on effector functions. By switching Fc domains of a single MAb, we have definitively shown that neutralization in vitro—and protection in vivo in a mouse model—by the human anti-B5 immunoglobulin G MAbs is isotype dependent, thereby demonstrating that efficient protection by these antibodies is not simply dependent on binding an appropriate vaccinia virion antigen with high affinity but in fact requires antibody effector function. The complement components C3 and C1q, but not C5, were required for neutralization. We also have demonstrated that human MAbs against B5 can potently direct complement-dependent cytotoxicity of vaccinia virus-infected cells. Each of these results was then extended to the polyclonal human antibody response to the smallpox vaccine. A model is proposed to explain the mechanism of EV neutralization. Altogether these findings enhance our understanding of the central protective activities of smallpox vaccine-elicited antibodies in immunized humans.The smallpox vaccine, live vaccinia virus (VACV), is frequently considered the gold standard of human vaccines and has been enormously effective in preventing smallpox disease. The smallpox vaccine led to the worldwide eradication of the disease via massive vaccination campaigns in the 1960s and 1970s, one of the greatest successes of modern medicine (30). However, despite the efficacy of the smallpox vaccine, the mechanisms of protection remain unclear. Understanding those mechanisms is key for developing immunologically sound vaccinology principles that can be applied to the design of future vaccines for other infectious diseases (3, 101).Clinical studies of fatal human cases of smallpox disease (variola virus infection) have shown that neutralizing antibody titers were either low or absent in patient serum (24, 68). In contrast, neutralizing antibody titers for the VACV intracellular mature virion (MV or IMV) were correlated with protection of vaccinees against smallpox (68). VACV immune globulin (VIG) (human polyclonal antibodies) is a promising treatment against smallpox (47), since it was able to reduce the number of smallpox cases ∼80% among variola-exposed individuals in four case-controlled clinical studies (43, 47, 52, 53, 69). In animal studies, neutralizing antibodies are crucial for protecting primates and mice against pathogenic poxviruses (3, 7, 17, 21, 27, 35, 61, 66, 85).The specificities and the functions of protective antipoxvirus antibodies have been areas of intensive research, and the mechanics of poxvirus neutralization have been debated for years. There are several interesting features and problems associated with the antibody response to variola virus and related poxviruses, including the large size of the viral particles and the various abundances of many distinct surface proteins (18, 75, 91, 93). Furthermore, poxviruses have two distinct virion forms, intracellular MV and extracellular enveloped virions (EV or EEV), each with a unique biology. Most importantly, MV and EV virions share no surface proteins (18, 93), and therefore, there is no single neutralizing antibody that can neutralize both virion forms. As such, an understanding of virion structure is required to develop knowledge regarding the targets of protective antibodies.Neutralizing antibodies confer protection mainly through the recognition of antigens on the surface of a virus. A number of groups have discovered neutralizing antibody targets of poxviruses in animals and humans (3). The relative roles of antibodies against MV and EV in protective immunity still remain somewhat unclear. There are compelling data that antibodies against MV (21, 35, 39, 66, 85, 90, 91) or EV (7, 16, 17, 36, 66, 91) are sufficient for protection, and a combination of antibodies against both targets is most protective (66). It remains controversial whether antibodies to one virion form are more important than those to the other (3, 61, 66). The most abundant viral particles are MV, which accumulate in infected cells and are released as cells die (75). Neutralization of MV is relatively well characterized (3, 8, 21, 35). EV, while less abundant, are critical for viral spread and virulence in vivo (93, 108). Neutralization of EV has remained more enigmatic (3).B5R (also known as B5 or WR187), one of five known EV-specific proteins, is highly conserved among different strains of VACV and in other orthopoxviruses (28, 49). B5 was identified as a protective antigen by Galmiche et al., and the available evidence indicated that the protection was mediated by anti-B5 antibodies (36). Since then, a series of studies have examined B5 as a potential recombinant vaccine antigen or as a target of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) (1, 2, 7, 17, 40, 46, 66, 91, 110). It is known that humans immunized with the smallpox vaccine make antibodies against B5 (5, 22, 62, 82). It is also known that animals receiving the smallpox vaccine generate antibodies against B5 (7, 20, 27, 70). Furthermore, previous neutralization assays have indicated that antibodies generated against B5 are primarily responsible for neutralization of VACV EV (5, 83). Recently Chen at al. generated chimpanzee-human fusion MAbs against B5 and showed that the MAbs can protect mice from lethal challenge with virulent VACV (17). We recently reported, in connection with a study using murine monoclonal antibodies, that neutralization of EV is highly complement dependent and the ability of anti-B5 MAbs to protect in vivo correlated with their ability to neutralize EV in a complement-dependent manner (7).The focus of the study described here was to elucidate the mechanisms of EV neutralization, focusing on the human antibody response to B5. Our overall goal is to understand underlying immunobiological and virological parameters that determine the emergence of protective antiviral immune responses in humans.     

A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

DivIC Stabilizes FtsL against RasP Cleavage

The essential cell division protein FtsL is a substrate of the intramembrane protease RasP. Using heterologous coexpression experiments, we show here that the division protein DivIC stabilizes FtsL against RasP cleavage. Degradation seems to be initiated upon accessibility of a cytosolic substrate recognition motif.Cell division in bacteria is a highly regulated process (1). The division site selection as well as assembly and disassembly of the divisome have to be strictly controlled (1, 4). Although the spatial control of the divisome is relatively well understood (2, 4, 14, 17), mechanisms governing the temporal control of division are still mainly elusive. Regulatory proteolysis was thought to be a potential modulatory mechanism (8, 9). The highly unstable division protein FtsL was shown to be rate limiting for division and would make an ideal candidate for a regulatory factor in the timing of bacterial cell division (7, 9). In Bacillus subtilis, FtsL is an essential protein of the membrane part of the divisome (5, 7, 8). It is necessary for the assembly of the membrane-spanning division proteins, and a knockout is lethal (8, 9, 12). We have previously reported that FtsL is a substrate of the intramembrane protease RasP (5).These findings raised the question of whether RasP can regulate cell division by cleaving FtsL from the division complex. In order to mimic the situation in which FtsL is bound to at least one of its interaction partners, we used a heterologous coexpression system in which we synthesized FtsL and DivIC. It has been reported before that DivIC and FtsL are intimate binding partners in various organisms (6, 9, 15, 21, 22, 26) and that FtsL and DivIC (together with DivIB) can form complexes even in the absence of the other divisome components (6, 21). We therefore asked whether RasP is able to cleave FtsL in the presence of its major interaction partner DivIC, which would argue for the possibility that RasP could cleave FtsL within a mature divisome. In contrast, if interaction with DivIC could stabilize FtsL against RasP cleavage, this result would bring such a model into question. An alternative option for the role of RasP might be the removal of FtsL from the membrane. It has been shown that divisome disassembly and prevention of reassembly are crucial to prevent minicell formation close to the new cell poles (3, 16).