OPEN WARD MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE ALCOHOLISM—Experience with a Pilot Program

Sixty acutely alcoholic patients were treated in unsegregated rooms of two to twelve beds in a general hospital to determine the feasibility of open ward care. Personnel caring for them were first educated in the nature of alcoholism, the aberrations it produces and treatment with tranquilizing drugs. Fears and objections were overcome.Violent or unpredictable patients were excluded from the test, but those with alcoholic hallucinations or delirium suspectible to control were admitted. Preliminary physical examination was done to find out whether there was coincidental disease. In three patients, one with subarachnoid hemorrhage, one with severe anemia and one with pneumonia and shock, this examination followed by prompt treatment was probably life-saving. Tranquilizers, fluids and vitamins were given routinely, by mouth as soon as possible.Alcoholic patients were found to be no more unmanageable than others.If it were generally accepted that acutely alcoholic patients, diagnosed as such, could be admitted to open ward care in general hospitals, candor in diagnosis would be encouraged thereby, coincident disease probably would be promptly recognized if present, and long-term treatment for the alcoholic addiction could be begun early.     

Palliatieve zorg op een chronische psychiatrische afdeling voor ouderen

Elderly, psychiatric patients admitted to a long-stay ward become physically ill and die. Which care can be offered on the ward and which cases require transferring a patient to specialized psychiatric-medical wards or a hospice? We studied 40 cases of death by malignancy in a clinic for elderly, long-term admitted psychiatric patients. Transferring the patient to such a ward was never indicated. Our population appeared to have a lack of awareness of their illness and expressed very few physical complaints. The possibilities of curative treatment of the malignancy were limited; the emphasis of the treatment was on palliative care. Because of the intensive support given on the patients ward the patients were able to die in peace. Deep sedation was never required.     

Meningococcal infections: reducing the case fatality rate by giving penicillin before admission to hospital.

OBJECTIVE--To determine whether parenteral penicillin given before admission to hospital reduces the case fatality rate in patients with meningococcal disease. DESIGN--Retrospective analysis of 46 consecutive patients admitted to hospital with meningococcal disease from January 1986 to March 1991. SETTING--District general hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Hospital case fatality rate. RESULTS--None of the 13 patients given parenteral penicillin by the referring doctor before admission died, compared with eight deaths (24%) in 33 patients admitted without such treatment. CONCLUSION--Parenteral penicillin given before admission probably contributed to a reduction in the case fatality rate from meningococcal disease, and primary care physicians should be encouraged to give such treatment immediately on suspicion of the diagnosis before transferring the patient to hospital. Public health physicians are well placed to inform and alert general practitioners of the potential benefit of this action.     

GERIATRIC PATIENTS IN A MENTAL HOSPITAL

An intensive study was made of men 55 years of age and over admitted to Napa State Hospital with either senile or arteriosclerotic brain disease. A ward treatment program, combining both the medical and psychiatric approaches, was applied to one-half of such patients admitted to a state hospital, with the aim of determining what, if any, effect this program would have on the course of the illnesses.Special laboratory studies showed: (a) Serial electroencephalograms and hospital adjustment ratings appeared to be positively correlated with the patients'' clinical course; (b) In 35 per cent of cases the electrocardiographic tracings at the time of admittance were within normal limits; (c) A “pathological level” of blood bromides was found in only one of 340 consecutive admissions in this age group.Sociopsychiatric study of 100 consecutively admitted patients revealed that: (a) 35 per cent of the patients were from the middle, and 65 per cent from the lower classes of society; (b) Only 59 per cent were admitted because of activities specifically psychotic. (c) 63 per cent needed admittance to this state hospital for observation and diagnosis, but only 44 per cent needed to stay for care and treatment; (d) In 88 per cent, specific emotional stresses were present just preceding and coincident with the clinical appearance of the organic brain syndrome.     

Psychogeriatric Ward for Mentally Disturbed Elderly Patients

The operation is described of a special psychogeriatric ward of 23 beds set up in 1967 to provide treatment for mentally disturbed elderly patients who could not be kept in a general ward or at home. The unit is in a predominantly geriatric hospital which serves a population of 340,000 and in the four and a half years reviewed 600 patients were admitted. Half of the admissions were emergencies. A consultant geriatrician was in charge and the nursing staff were general trained. The number of beds was found to be adequate for the demand. Few patients had to be transferred to a psychiatric hospital, but, since the mental disturbance was often associated with severe illness and the patients were old, the death rate was high. The nursing staff have found the work interesting and stimulating.     

DOES YOUR HOSPITAL NEED A RECOVERY ROOM?

In a survey made to estimate the need for a special room in which patients could recover from anesthesia after operation, it was found that of 475 cases in which this service might have been used, it would have been desirable in 296; that recovery room care would probably have relieved ward nurses of the duty of special care during their busiest hours; that recovery room care was indicated in a high percentage of cases in which certain anesthetics were employed, and that the need for recovery room care appeared to increase in proportion to the amount of pre-sedation given.     

Medical Care of the Alcoholic Patient

Alcoholism is an illness that constitutes a major health problem at all levels of society. The physician should accept his responsibility to prevent it and to care for the alcoholic. If he knows that one of his patients is drinking immoderately, he should warn him of the outlook. A patient''s acquired dependence on alcohol may be overt, or revealed only on examination for organic disease or emotional disturbance. The diagnosis may be accepted reluctantly, or denied despite positive evidence, but the patient should be persuaded to give up drinking. He may require psychiatric help or advice from a social worker. He may be so ill as to require treatment in hospital, and hospitals must recognize the urgency of such admissions. Discharge from hospital does not end treatment, for alcoholism is a chronic disease, requiring long-term planning, persistent follow-up and enduring sympathy by the physician, who must always be as available to his alcoholic patient as he is to his patient with diabetes, epilepsy or cardiac disease.     

Randomised controlled trial of day patient versus inpatient psychiatric treatment.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the proportion of acutely ill psychiatric patients who can be treated in a day hospital and compare the outcome of day patient and inpatient treatment. DESIGN--Prospective randomised controlled trial of day patient versus inpatient treatment after exclusion of patients precluded by severity of illness or other factors from being treated as day patients. All three groups assessed at three and 12 months. SETTING--Teaching hospital serving small socially deprived inner city area. Day hospital designed to take acute admissions because of few beds. PATIENTS--175 Patients were considered, of whom 73 could not be allocated. Of the remaining 102 patients, 51 were allocated to each treatment setting but only 89 became established in treatment--namely, 41 day patients and 48 inpatients. 73 Of these 89 patients were reassessed at three months and 70 at one year. INTERVENTIONS--Standard day patient and inpatient treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Discharge from hospital and return to previous level of social functioning; reduction of psychiatric symptoms, abnormal behaviour, and burden on relatives. RESULTS--33 Of 48 inpatients were discharged at three months compared with 17 of 41 day patients. But at one year 9 of 48 inpatients and three of 41 day patients were in hospital. 18 Of 35 day patients and 16 of 39 inpatients were at their previous level of social functioning at one year. The only significant difference at three months was a greater improvement in social role performance in the inpatients. At one year there was no significant difference between day patients and inpatients in present state examination summary scores and social role performance, burden, or behaviour. CONCLUSIONS--Roughly 40% of all acutely ill patients presenting for admission to a psychiatric unit may be treated satisfactorily in a well staffed day hospital. The outcome of treatment is similar to that of inpatient care but might possibly reduce readmissions. The hospital costs seem to be similar but further research is required to assess the costs in terms of extra demands on relatives, general practitioners, and other community resources.     

General-practitioner Ward in a District General Hospital

A general-practitioner ward, made available at the local hospital, was used by 34 of 64 local practitioners offered contracts by the regional board. Four of the five doctors in our practice took up contracts, and we were responsible for 119 admissions (100 patients) in one year. Had the general-practitioner ward not been available 73 hospital admissions would have been needed; in 27 cases care at home would have been the alternative, while the remaining 19 patients could have been seen as outpatients. Only seven consultant opinions were sought during the year.     

A randomized controlled trial investigation of a non-stimulant in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ACTION): Rationale and design

Background

Patients with delirium and dementia admitted to general hospitals have poor outcomes, and their carers report poor experiences. We developed an acute geriatric medical ward into a specialist Medical and Mental Health Unit over an eighteen month period. Additional specialist mental health staff were employed, other staff were trained in the 'person-centred' dementia care approach, a programme of meaningful activity was devised, the environment adapted to the needs of people with cognitive impairment, and attention given to communication with family carers. We hypothesise that patients managed on this ward will have better outcomes than those receiving standard care, and that such care will be cost-effective.

Methods/design

We will perform a controlled clinical trial comparing in-patient management on a specialist Medical and Mental Health Unit with standard care. Study participants are patients over the age of 65, admitted as an emergency to a single general hospital, and identified on the Acute Medical Admissions Unit as being 'confused'. Sample size is 300 per group. The evaluation design has been adapted to accommodate pressures on bed management and patient flows. If beds are available on the specialist Unit, the clinical service allocates patients at random between the Unit and standard care on general or geriatric medical wards. Once admitted, randomised patients and their carers are invited to take part in a follow up study, and baseline data are collected. Quality of care and patient experience are assessed in a non-participant observer study. Outcomes are ascertained at a follow up home visit 90 days after randomisation, by a researcher blind to allocation. The primary outcome is days spent at home (for those admitted from home), or days spent in the same care home (if admitted from a care home). Secondary outcomes include mortality, institutionalisation, resource use, and scaled outcome measures, including quality of life, cognitive function, disability, behavioural and psychological symptoms, carer strain and carer satisfaction with hospital care. Analyses will comprise comparisons of process, outcomes and costs between the specialist unit and standard care treatment groups.

Trial Registration number

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01136148     

The elderly in a coronary unit.

The clinical features of myocardial infarction were compared in 104 patients over the age of 70 and 399 younger patients admitted to a coronary care unit. Absence of an age bar at 70 years has increased the number of admission to the unit by 24%, and the number of patients with proved infarcts by 26%. Severe complications are more common and mortality is doubled in the elderly. Although immediate management of primary ventricular fibrillation is as successful in older as in younger patients, treatment of the elderly with less dramatic conditions is less successful. The elderly survivors tend to spend longer in the coronary unit and subsequently in the general medical ward.     

Quality of Care of Hospitalized Internal Medicine Patients Bedspaced to Non-Internal Medicine Inpatient Units

Background

When the number of patients requiring hospital admission exceeds the number of available department-allotted beds, patients are often placed on a different specialty''s inpatient ward, a practice known as “bedspacing”. Whether bedspacing affects quality of patient care has not been previously studied.

Methods

We reviewed consecutive general internal medicine (GIM) admissions for congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and pneumonia at St. Michael''s Hospital in Toronto, Canada, from 2007 to 2011 and examined whether quality of care differs between bedspaced and nonbedspaced patients. We matched each bedspaced patient with a GIM ward patient admitted on the same call shift with the same diagnosis. The primary outcome was the ratio of the actual to the estimated length of stay (ELOS). General and disease specific measures for CHF, COPD, and pneumonia (e.g. fluid restriction) were evaluated, as well as 30-day Emergency Department (ED) and hospital readmissions.

Results

Overall, 1639 consecutive admissions were reviewed, and 39 matched pairs for CHF, COPD and pneumonia were studied. Differences in both general and disease specific care measures were not detected between groups. For many disease-specific comparisons, ordering and adherence to quality of care indicators was low in both groups.

Conclusions

We were unable to detect differences in quality of care between bedspaced and nonbedspaced patients. As high patient volumes and hospital overcrowding remains, bedspacing will likely continue. More research is required in order to determine if quality of care is compromised by this ongoing practice.     

Comparison of mortality of patients with heart attacks admitted to a coronary care unit and an ordinary medical ward.

During a 32-month period 2047 patients suspected of having heart attacks were admitted to hospital and were followed up prospectively. Out of 1480 eventually found to have definite or probable myocardial infarction, 483 had initially been admitted to an ordinary medical ward because of the shortage of coronary care unit (CCU) beds. More patients aged over 65 had been admitted to a ward than to a CCU, and more patients aged 65 or less had been admitted initially to a CCU. Within each age group, however, patients admitted initially to a CCU were clinically similar to those admitted initially to a ward. There was a higher proportion of successful resuscitations among patients admitted to a CCU, but there was no significant difference in mortality in either age group between patients admitted to a CCU and a ward.     

Operations for hernia and varicose veins in a day-bed unit.

Over eight years (1970-8) 1055 patients underwent operations for hernia or "major" varicose veins in a day-bed unit. Here, 608 were discharged home on the day of operation, 262 were transferred to a convalescent hospital for 48 hours, and 161 were retained in the acute ward as part of a controlled trial. Special emphasis was placed on selection and preadmission screening. Failure of planning was uncommon in that only 2.5% were detained in hospital and 1% had to be readmitted. About one-quarter of the patients had complications but these were generally trivial and were satisfactorily treated by the community nursing sisters or general practitioners, or both. Analysis of the total operations for hernia or varicose veins in the unit over the past 19 years shows that, whereas formerly all patients with these conditions were admitted to the main surgical ward, nowadays almost all are managed either by day care or in a five-day ward.     

Application Of The American College Of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Recommendations And a Risk Stratification Score (OESIL) For Patients With Syncope Admitted From The Emergency Department

Aims

The goals of this study were to apply the 2001 ACEP recommendations for admission to hospital after a syncopal event and to validate the OESIL risk stratification score, in patients with syncope admitted to a general internal medicine ward.

Methods

A retrospective study applied the 2001 ACEP recommendations and OESIL score to all the patients admitted from the emergency department to a general internal medicine ward with a diagnosis of syncope during a 12-month period. The patients were classified as meeting criteria for 2001 ACEP class B or C recommendations and OESIL score 0-1 (low-risk for a major cardiac event) or 2-4 (high-risk for a major cardiac event). The sensitivity and specificity of each group for predicting high-risk patients was calculated.

Results

After applying the 2001 ACEP recommendations to our population, 25% (19 patients) were classified as level B, whereas 68% of the patients were classified as Level C. Sensitivity for ACEP level B recommendations was 100% and specificity was 81%. The ACEP level C recommendations also had 100% sensitivity but markedly reduced specificity at 26%. An OESIL score of 0-1 points was calculated for 30.6% of the population, identifying them as low-risk. An OESIL score of 2-4 points was documented in the remaining 69.4% with a mortality risk of 20 % /year.

Conclusion

A significant proportion (30%) of patients presenting with syncope to a tertiary care University Hospital emergency department and admitted to an Internal Medicine ward were retrospectively classified as low-risk and could have potentially been managed as outpatients. Implementing current guidelines and clinical pathways for the management of syncope may improve this approach.     

Coronary Care Unit in a General Medical Ward

A five-bedded coronary care unit has been set up within a general medical ward without the provision of extra medical or nursing staff. During 30 months 1,000 patients were admitted. Sixty-three developed cardiac arrest; 28 were resuscitated successfully initially; and 18 were eventually discharged. The corresponding figures for the 28 patients with ventricular fibrillation treated by direct current defibrillation were 20 and 12 respectively. The mortality rate during the first three days (the usual length of stay in the unit) was 8·9% compared with 9·7% after transfer to the general ward. It is suggested that these results are comparable with those from more highly staffed purpose-built units.     

Randomised controlled trial of smoking cessation intervention after admission for coronary heart disease

Objective To determine whether a nurse led smoking cessation intervention affects smoking cessation rates in patients admitted for coronary heart disease.Design Randomised controlled trial.Setting Cardiac ward of a general hospital, Norway.Participants 240 smokers aged under 76 years admitted for myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or cardiac bypass surgery. 118 were randomly assigned to the intervention and 122 to usual care (control group).Intervention The intervention was based on a booklet and focused on fear arousal and prevention of relapses. The intervention was delivered by cardiac nurses without special training. The intervention was initiated in hospital, and the participants were contacted regularly for at least five months.Main outcome measure Smoking cessation rates at 12 months determined by self report and biochemical verification.Results 12 months after admission to hospital, 57% (n = 57/100) of patients in the intervention group and 37% (n = 44/118) in the control group had quit smoking (absolute risk reduction 20%, 95% confidence interval 6% to 33%). The number needed to treat to get one additional person who would quit was 5 (95% confidence interval, 3 to 16). Assuming all dropouts relapsed at 12 months, the smoking cessation rates were 50% in the intervention group and 37% in the control group (absolute risk reduction 13%, 0% to 26%).Conclusion A smoking cessation programme delivered by cardiac nurses without special training, significantly reduced smoking rates in patients 12 months after admission to hospital for coronary heart disease.     

Patient satisfaction with general practitioner deputising services.

Proposed increases in the average hours of surgery sessions of general practitioners as part of the government programme for improving primary health care may result in more use of deputising services to provide off duty cover. The satisfaction of patients with such a service was studied during one week of October 1987 at nine of the 29 branches of Air Call Medical Services in urban areas in Britain by means of a postal questionnaire. Of a sample of 4626 callers to the service, 3887 (84%) responded. An estimated 32% of the patients expected that a doctor from their own practice would have attended them, 19% expected that they would be admitted to hospital and 8% were admitted. Over 90% of patients were satisfied with the telephonist''s handling of the call; 79% of those visited were satisfied with the waiting time; and over 80% were satisfied with various aspects of the doctor''s handling of the visit (bedside manner, communication, taking of history, physical examination, and explanation of findings), the lowest figure being for explanation of findings (81%). Satisfaction was generally higher during the daytime; among the elderly, especially men; and among patients who did not anticipate that a doctor from their doctor''s practice would call. The results suggest that a high proportion of patients were satisfied with the deputising service they received.     

Trauma services requirements in a district general hospital serving a rural area.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the demands made on a regional trauma centre by a district trauma unit. DESIGN--Two part study. (1) Prospective analysis of one month''s workload. (2) Retrospective analysis of one year''s workload by using a computer based records system. Comparison of two sets of results. SETTING--Accident unit in Gwynedd Hospital, Bangor. PATIENTS--(1) All patients who attended the accident unit in August 1988. (2) All patients who attended the accident unit in the calendar year April 1988-April 1989. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Workload of a district trauma unit. RESULTS--In August 1988 there were 2325 attendances; 2302 of these were analysed. In all, 1904 attendances were for trauma; 213 patients were admitted to the trauma ward and 103 required an operation that entailed incision. Patients who attended the unit had a mean (range) injury severity score of 2-13 (0-25). Only two patients had injuries that a district general hospital would not be expected to cope with (injury severity score greater than 20). In the year April 1988-April 1989, 21,007 patients attended the unit. In all, 17,958 attendances were for orthopaedic injuries or injuries caused by an accident; 1966 patients were admitted to the unit. CONCLUSIONS--Most trauma is musculoskeletal and relatively minor according to the injury severity score. All but a few injuries can be managed in district general hospitals. In their recent report the Royal College of Surgeons has overestimated the requirements that a British district general hospital would have of a regional trauma centre.     

Deputising services: the portsmouth experience.

An analysis of the deputising service in the city of Portsmouth showed that the workload of doctors was not excessive and there was no evidence that the number of calls was higher than in areas where no deputising service exists. Sixty seven per cent of patients were seen within one hour of requesting a call and 93% within two hours. Seven per cent of patients were admitted to hospital and 88% of these were seen within one hour of requesting medical care. Drugs were prescribed at 65% of all contacts between doctor and patient which compares favourably with prescribing rates for consultations in general practice. A notable feature of the Portsmouth scheme is that all subscribers who use the deputising service have to agree to participate as a deputy, with 90% of deputies being practising general practitioners or eligible to be principals in general practice. This has probably conserved costs and hospital resources.