The Controversial Denouement of Vertebrate DNA Methylation Research

The study of the biological role of DNA methylation in vertebrates has involved considerable controversy. Research in this area has proceeded well despite the complexity of the subject and the difficulties in establishing biological roles, some of which are summarized in this review. Now there is justifiably much more interest in DNA methylation than previously, and many more laboratories are engaged in this research. The results of numerous studies indicate that some tissue-specific differences in vertebrate DNA methylation help maintain patterns of gene expression or are involved in fine-tuning or establishing expression patterns. Therefore, vertebrate DNA methylation cannot just be assigned a role in silencing transposable elements and foreign DNA sequences, as has been suggested. DNA methylation is clearly implicated in modulating X chromosome inactivation and in establishing genetic imprinting. Also, hypermethylation of CpG-rich promoters of tumor suppressor genes in cancer has a critical role in downregulating expression of these genes and thus participating in carcinogenesis. The complex nature of DNA methylation patterns extends to carcinogenesis because global DNA hypomethylation is found in the same cancers displaying hypermethylation elsewhere in the genome. A wide variety of cancers display both DNA hypomethylation and hypermethylation, and either of these types of changes can be significantly associated with tumor progression. These findings and the independence of cancer-linked DNA hypomethylation from cancer-linked hypermethylation strongly implicate DNA hypomethylation, as well as hypermethylation, in promoting carcinogenesis. Furthermore, various DNA demethylation methodologies have been shown to increase the formation of certain types of cancers in animals, and paradoxically, DNA hypermethylation can cause carcinogenesis in other model systems. Therefore, there is a need for caution in the current use of demethylating agents as anti-cancer drugs. Nonetheless, DNA demethylation therapy clearly may be very useful in cases where better alternatives do not exist.     

DNA methylation aberrancies as a guide for surveillance and treatment of human cancers

DNA methylation aberrancies are hallmarks of human cancers and are characterized by global DNA hypomethylation of repetitive elements and non-CpG rich regions concomitant with locus-specific DNA hypermethylation. DNA methylation changes may result in altered gene expression profiles, most notably the silencing of tumor suppressors, microRNAs, endogenous retorviruses and tumor antigens due to promoter DNA hypermethylation, as well as oncogene upregulation due to gene-body DNA hypermethylation. Here, we review DNA methylation aberrancies in human cancers, their use in cancer surveillance and the interplay between DNA methylation and histone modifications in gene regulation. We also summarize DNA methylation inhibitors and their therapeutic effects in cancer treatment. In this context, we describe the integration of DNA methylation inhibitors with conventional chemotherapies, DNA repair inhibitors and immune-based therapies, to bring the epigenome closer to its normal state and increase sensitivity to other therapeutic agents to improve patient outcome and survival.     

DNA methylation of mobile genetic elements in human cancers

Mobile genetic elements are responsible for half of the human genome, creating the host genomic instability or variability through several mechanisms. Two types of abnormal DNA methylation in the genome, hypomethylation and hypermethylation, are associated with cancer progression. Genomic hypermethylation has been most often observed on the CpG islands around gene promoter regions in cancer cells. In contrast, hypomethylation has been observed on mobile genetic elements in the cancer cells. It is recently considered that the hypomethylation of mobile genetic elements may play a biological role in cancer cells along with the DNA hypermethylation on CpG islands. Growing evidence has indicated that mobile genetic elements could be associated with the cancer initiation and progression through the hypomethylation. Here we review the recent progress on the relationship between DNA methylation and mobile genetic elements, focusing on the hypomethylation of LINE-1 and HERV elements in various human cancers and suggest that DNA hypomethylation of mobile genetic elements could have potential to be a new cancer therapy target in the future.     

Epigenetic diagnostics of cancer — the application of DNA methylation markers

In recent years it has become apparent that epigenetic events are potentially equally responsible for cancer initiation and progression as genetic abnormalities. DNA methylation is the main epigenetic modification in humans. Two DNA methylation lesions coexist in human neoplasms: hypermethylation of promoter regions of specific genes within a context of genomic hypomethylation. Aberrant methylation is found at early stages of carcinogenesis and distinct types of cancer exhibit specific patterns of methylation changes. Tumor specific DNA is readily obtainable from different clinical samples and methylation status analysis often permits sensitive disease detection. Methylation markers may also serve for prognostic and predictive purposes as they often reflect the metastatic potential and sensitivity to therapy. As current findings show a great potential of recently characterised methylation markers, more studies in the field are needed in the future. Large clinical studies of newly developed markers are especially needed. The review describes the diagnostic potential of DNA methylation markers.     

Long interspersed nuclear element-1 hypomethylation in cancer: biology and clinical applications

Epigenetic changes in long interspersed nuclear element-1s (LINE-1s or L1s) occur early during the process of carcinogenesis. A lower methylation level (hypomethylation) of LINE-1 is common in most cancers, and the methylation level is further decreased in more advanced cancers. Consequently, several previous studies have suggested the use of LINE-1 hypomethylation levels in cancer screening, risk assessment, tumor staging, and prognostic prediction. Epigenomic changes are complex, and global hypomethylation influences LINE-1s in a generalized fashion. However, the methylation levels of some loci are dependent on their locations. The consequences of LINE-1 hypomethylation are genomic instability and alteration of gene expression. There are several mechanisms that promote both of these consequences in cis. Therefore, the methylation levels of different sets of LINE-1s may represent certain phenotypes. Furthermore, the methylation levels of specific sets of LINE-1s may indicate carcinogenesis-dependent hypomethylation. LINE-1 methylation pattern analysis can classify LINE-1s into one of three classes based on the number of methylated CpG dinucleotides. These classes include hypermethylation, partial methylation, and hypomethylation. The number of partial and hypermethylated loci, but not hypomethylated LINE-1s, is different among normal cell types. Consequently, the number of hypomethylated loci is a more promising marker than methylation level in the detection of cancer DNA. Further genome-wide studies to measure the methylation level of each LINE-1 locus may improve PCR-based methylation analysis to allow for a more specific and sensitive detection of cancer DNA or for an analysis of certain cancer phenotypes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13148-011-0032-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Blood-based DNA methylation signatures in cancer: A systematic review

DNA methylation profiles are in dynamic equilibrium via the initiation of methylation, maintenance of methylation and demethylation, which control gene expression and chromosome stability. Changes in DNA methylation patterns play important roles in carcinogenesis and primarily manifests as hypomethylation of the entire genome and the hypermethylation of individual loci. These changes may be reflected in blood-based DNA, which provides a non-invasive means for cancer monitoring. Previous blood-based DNA detection objects primarily included circulating tumor DNA/cell-free DNA (ctDNA/cfDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and exosomes. Researchers gradually found that methylation changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) also reflected the presence of tumors. Blood-based DNA methylation is widely used in early diagnosis, prognosis prediction, dynamic monitoring after treatment and other fields of clinical research on cancer. The reversible methylation of genes also makes them important therapeutic targets. The present paper summarizes the changes in DNA methylation in cancer based on existing research and focuses on the characteristics of the detection objects of blood-based DNA, including ctDNA/cfDNA, CTCs, exosomes and PBMCs, and their application in clinical research.     

Reproducibility and concordance of differential DNA methylation and gene expression in cancer

Background

Hundreds of genes with differential DNA methylation of promoters have been identified for various cancers. However, the reproducibility of differential DNA methylation discoveries for cancer and the relationship between DNA methylation and aberrant gene expression have not been systematically analysed.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Using array data for seven types of cancers, we first evaluated the effects of experimental batches on differential DNA methylation detection. Second, we compared the directions of DNA methylation changes detected from different datasets for the same cancer. Third, we evaluated the concordance between methylation and gene expression changes. Finally, we compared DNA methylation changes in different cancers. For a given cancer, the directions of methylation and expression changes detected from different datasets, excluding potential batch effects, were highly consistent. In different cancers, DNA hypermethylation was highly inversely correlated with the down-regulation of gene expression, whereas hypomethylation was only weakly correlated with the up-regulation of genes. Finally, we found that genes commonly hypomethylated in different cancers primarily performed functions associated with chronic inflammation, such as ‘keratinization’, ‘chemotaxis’ and ‘immune response’.

Conclusions

Batch effects could greatly affect the discovery of DNA methylation biomarkers. For a particular cancer, both differential DNA methylation and gene expression can be reproducibly detected from different studies with no batch effects. While DNA hypermethylation is significantly linked to gene down-regulation, hypomethylation is only weakly correlated with gene up-regulation and is likely to be linked to chronic inflammation.     

The Dynamics of DNA Methylation Covariation Patterns in Carcinogenesis

Recently it has been observed that cancer tissue is characterised by an increased variability in DNA methylation patterns. However, how the correlative patterns in genome-wide DNA methylation change during the carcinogenic progress has not yet been explored. Here we study genome-wide inter-CpG correlations in DNA methylation, in addition to single site variability, during cervical carcinogenesis. We demonstrate how the study of changes in DNA methylation covariation patterns across normal, intra-epithelial neoplasia and invasive cancer allows the identification of CpG sites that indicate the risk of neoplastic transformation in stages prior to neoplasia. Importantly, we show that the covariation in DNA methylation at these risk CpG loci is maximal immediately prior to the onset of cancer, supporting the view that high epigenetic diversity in normal cells increases the risk of cancer. Consistent with this, we observe that invasive cancers exhibit increased covariation in DNA methylation at the risk CpG sites relative to normal tissue, but lower levels relative to pre-cancerous lesions. We further show that the identified risk CpG sites undergo preferential DNA methylation changes in relation to human papilloma virus infection and age. Results are validated in independent data including prospectively collected samples prior to neoplastic transformation. Our data are consistent with a phase transition model of carcinogenesis, in which epigenetic diversity is maximal prior to the onset of cancer. The model and algorithm proposed here may allow, in future, network biomarkers predicting the risk of neoplastic transformation to be identified.     

Genome-wide hypomethylation in cancer may be a passive consequence of transformation

Epigenetics describes the study of stable, reversible alterations to the genome that affect gene expression and genome function, the most studied mechanisms are DNA methylation and histone modifications. Over recent years there has been rapid progress to elucidate the nature and role of the mechanisms involved in promoter hypermethylation during carcinogenesis, however, the mechanism behind one of the earliest epigenetic observations in cancer, genome-wide hypomethylation, remains unclear. Current evidence is divided between the hypotheses that hypomethylation is either an important early cancer-causing aberration or that it is a passive inconsequential side effect of carcinogenesis. With recent discoveries of gene–body methylation, fast cyclic methylation of hormone dependent genes and candidate proteins involved in DNA demethylation elucidation of the role of hypomethylation and the mechanism behind it appears ever closer. With the burgeoning use of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors as a cancer therapy there is an increased need to understand the mechanisms and importance of genome-wide hypomethylation in cancer. This review will discuss the timing and potential causes of genomic hypomethylation during carcinogenesis and will propose a way forward to understand the underlying mechanisms.     

LINE-1 methylation patterns of different loci in normal and cancerous cells

This study evaluated methylation patterns of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1) sequences from 17 loci in several cell types, including squamous cell cancer cell lines, normal oral epithelium (NOE), white blood cells and head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC). Although sequences of each LINE-1 are homologous, LINE-1 methylation levels at each locus are different. Moreover, some loci demonstrate the different methylation levels between normal tissue types. Interestingly, in some chromosomal regions, wider ranges of LINE-1 methylation levels were observed. In cancerous cells, the methylation levels of most LINE-1 loci demonstrated a positive correlation with each other and with the genome-wide levels. Therefore, the loss of genome-wide methylation in cancerous cells occurs as a generalized process. However, different LINE-1 loci showed different incidences of HNSCC hypomethylation, which is a lower methylation level than NOE. Additionally, we report a closer direct association between two LINE-1s in different EPHA3 introns. Finally, hypermethylation of some LINE-1s can be found sporadically in cancer. In conclusion, even though the global hypomethylation process that occurs in cancerous cells can generally deplete LINE-1 methylation levels, LINE-1 methylation can be influenced differentially depending on where the particular sequences are located in the genome.     

Distinct functional patterns of gene promoter hypomethylation and hypermethylation in cancer genomes

Background

Aberrant DNA methylation plays important roles in carcinogenesis. However, the functional significance of genome-wide hypermethylation and hypomethylation of gene promoters in carcinogenesis currently remain unclear.

Principal Findings

Based on genome-wide methylation data for five cancer types, we showed that genes with promoter hypermethylation were highly consistent in function across different cancer types, and so were genes with promoter hypomethylation. Functions related to “developmental processes” and “regulation of biology processes” were significantly enriched with hypermethylated genes but were depleted of hypomethylated genes. In contrast, functions related to “cell killing” and “response to stimulus”, including immune and inflammatory response, were associated with an enrichment of hypomethylated genes and depletion of hypermethylated genes. We also observed that some families of cytokines secreted by immune cells, such as IL10 family cytokines and chemokines, tended to be hypomethylated in various cancer types. These results provide new hints for understanding the distinct functional roles of genome-wide hypermethylation and hypomethylation of gene promoters in carcinogenesis.

Conclusions

Genes with promoter hypermethylation and hypomethylation are highly consistent in function across different cancer types, respectively, but these two groups of genes tend to be enriched in different functions associated with cancer. Especially, we speculate that hypomethylation of gene promoters may play roles in inducing immunity and inflammation disorders in precancerous conditions, which may provide hints for improving epigenetic therapy and immunotherapy of cancer.     

DNA methylation-dependent regulation of TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC genes in human hepatocellular carcinoma

The tropomyosin-related kinase (Trk) family of neurotrophin receptors, TrkA, TrkB and TrkC, has been implicated in the growth and survival of human cancers. Here we report that Trks are frequently overexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from patients and human liver cancer cell lines. To unravel the underlying molecular mechanism(s) for this phenomenon, DNA methylation patterns of CpG islands in TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC genes were examined in normal and cancer cell lines derived from liver. A good correlation was observed between promoter hypermethylation and lower expression of TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC genes, which was supported by the data that inhibiting DNA methylation with 5-azacytidine restored expression of those genes in normal liver cell lines. Furthermore, Trks promoted the proliferation of HepG2 and induced expression of the metastatic regulator, Twist. These results suggest that Trks may contribute to growth and metastasis of liver cancer.     

DNA Demethylation and Carcinogenesis

DNA methylation plays an important role in the establishment and maintenance of the program of gene expression. Tumor cells are characterized by a paradoxical alteration of DNA methylation pattern: global DNA demethylation and local hypermethylation of certain genes. Hypermethylation and inactivation of tumor suppressor genes are well documented in tumors. The role of global genome demethylation in carcinogenesis is less studied. New data provide evidence for independence of DNA hypo- and hypermethylation processes in tumor cells. These processes alter expression of genes that have different functions in malignant transformation. Recent studies have demonstrated that global decrease in the level of DNA methylation is related to hypomethylation of repeated sequences, increase in genetic instability, hypomethylation and activation of certain genes that favor tumor growth, and increase in their metastatic and invasive potential. The recent data on the role of DNA demethylation in carcinogenesis are discussed in this review. The understanding of relationships between hypo- and hypermethylation in tumor cells is extremely important due to reversibility of DNA methylation and attempts to utilize for anti-tumor therapy the drugs that modify DNA methylation pattern.__________Translated from Biokhimiya, Vol. 70, No. 7, 2005, pp. 900–911.Original Russian Text Copyright © 2005 by Kisseljova, Kisseljov.This article was not published in the journal special issue devoted to the 70th anniversary of B. F. Vanyushin (Biochemistry (Moscow) (2005) 70, No. 5) because of the limiting volume of the journal.     

Fundamental differences in promoter CpG island DNA hypermethylation between human cancer and genetically engineered mouse models of cancer

Genetic and epigenetic alterations are essential for the initiation and progression of human cancer. We previously reported that primary human medulloblastomas showed extensive cancer-specific CpG island DNA hypermethylation in critical developmental pathways. To determine whether genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) of medulloblastoma have comparable epigenetic changes, we assessed genome-wide DNA methylation in three mouse models of medulloblastoma. In contrast to human samples, very few loci with cancer-specific DNA hypermethylation were detected, and in almost all cases the degree of methylation was relatively modest compared with the dense hypermethylation in the human cancers. To determine if this finding was common to other GEMMs, we examined a Burkitt lymphoma and breast cancer model and did not detect promoter CpG island DNA hypermethylation, suggesting that human cancers and at least some GEMMs are fundamentally different with respect to this epigenetic modification. These findings provide an opportunity to both better understand the mechanism of aberrant DNA methylation in human cancer and construct better GEMMs to serve as preclinical platforms for therapy development.