The coiled-coil and nucleotide binding domains of the Potato Rx disease resistance protein function in pathogen recognition and signaling

Plant genomes encode large numbers of nucleotide binding and leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR) proteins, some of which mediate the recognition of pathogen-encoded proteins. Following recognition, the initiation of a resistance response is thought to be mediated by the domains present at the N termini of NB-LRR proteins, either a Toll and Interleukin-1 Receptor or a coiled-coil (CC) domain. In order to understand the role of the CC domain in NB-LRR function, we have undertaken a systematic structure-function analysis of the CC domain of the potato (Solanum tuberosum) CC-NB-LRR protein Rx, which confers resistance to Potato virus X. We show that the highly conserved EDVID motif of the CC domain mediates an intramolecular interaction that is dependent on several domains within the rest of the Rx protein, including the NB and LRR domains. Other conserved and nonconserved regions of the CC domain mediate the interaction with the Ran GTPase-activating protein, RanGAP2, a protein required for Rx function. Furthermore, we show that the Rx NB domain is sufficient for inducing cell death typical of hypersensitive plant resistance responses. We describe a model of CC-NB-LRR function wherein the LRR and CC domains coregulate the signaling activity of the NB domain in a recognition-specific manner.     

Interaction between domains of a plant NBS-LRR protein in disease resistance-related cell death

Many plant disease resistance (R) genes encode proteins predicted to have an N-terminal coiled-coil (CC) domain, a central nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain and a C-terminal leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain. These CC-NBS-LRR proteins recognize specific pathogen-derived products and initiate a resistance response that often includes a type of cell death known as the hypersensitive response (HR). Co-expression of the potato CC-NBS-LRR protein Rx and its elicitor, the PVX coat protein (CP), results in a rapid HR. Surprisingly, co-expression of the LRR and CC-NBS as separate domains also resulted in a CP-dependent HR. Likewise, the CC domain complemented a version of Rx lacking this domain (NBS- LRR). Correspondingly, the LRR domain interacted physically in planta with the CC-NBS, as did CC with NBS-LRR. Both interactions were disrupted in the presence of CP. However, the interaction between CC and NBS-LRR was dependent on a wild-type P-loop motif, whereas the interaction between CC-NBS and LRR was not. We propose that activation of Rx entails sequential disruption of at least two intramolecular interactions.     

Structural Determinants at the Interface of the ARC2 and Leucine-Rich Repeat Domains Control the Activation of the Plant Immune Receptors Rx1 and Gpa2

Many plant and animal immune receptors have a modular nucleotide-binding-leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR) architecture in which a nucleotide-binding switch domain, NB-ARC, is tethered to a LRR sensor domain. The cooperation between the switch and sensor domains, which regulates the activation of these proteins, is poorly understood. Here, we report structural determinants governing the interaction between the NB-ARC and LRR in the highly homologous plant immune receptors Gpa2 and Rx1, which recognize the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida and Potato virus X, respectively. Systematic shuffling of polymorphic sites between Gpa2 and Rx1 showed that a minimal region in the ARC2 and N-terminal repeats of the LRR domain coordinate the activation state of the protein. We identified two closely spaced amino acid residues in this region of the ARC2 (positions 401 and 403) that distinguish between autoactivation and effector-triggered activation. Furthermore, a highly acidic loop region in the ARC2 domain and basic patches in the N-terminal end of the LRR domain were demonstrated to be required for the physical interaction between the ARC2 and LRR. The NB-ARC and LRR domains dissociate upon effector-dependent activation, and the complementary-charged regions are predicted to mediate a fast reassociation, enabling multiple rounds of activation. Finally, we present a mechanistic model showing how the ARC2, NB, and N-terminal half of the LRR form a clamp, which regulates the dissociation and reassociation of the switch and sensor domains in NB-LRR proteins.Resistance (R) proteins play a central role in the recognition-based immune system of plants. Unlike vertebrates, plants lack an adaptive immune system with highly specialized immune cells. Instead, they rely on an innate immune system in which each cell is autonomous. Two types of immune receptors can be distinguished in plants, pathogen-associated molecular patterns recognition receptors that detect conserved molecular patterns in plant pathogens and intracellular R proteins that recognize specific effectors employed by pathogens as modifiers of host metabolism or defense mechanisms (Jones and Dangl, 2006). Effector-triggered activation of R proteins leads to an array of protective responses, often culminating in programmed cell death at the site of infection (Greenberg and Yao, 2004), thereby preventing further ingress of the pathogen. Pathogens have evolved mechanisms to evade recognition by R proteins and to regain their virulence (Dodds and Rathjen, 2010). This continuous coevolutionary process between host and pathogen has resulted in a reservoir of highly diverse R proteins in plants, enabling them to counteract a wide range of pathogens and pests.The most common class of R proteins consists of nucleotide-binding (NB)-leucine-rich repeat (LRR) proteins with a tripartite domain architecture, which roughly corresponds to an N-terminal response domain (a coiled coil [CC] or Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor [TIR] domain) involved in downstream signaling, a central molecular switch domain (the NB domain present in the mammalian apoptosis regulator Apaf1, plant R proteins, and the Caenorhabditis elegans apoptosis regulator CED4 [NB-ARC]), and a C-terminal sensor domain (the LRR domain). The NB-ARC domain is an extended nucleotide-binding domain that plant immune receptors share with metazoan apoptosis regulators and immune receptors such as Apaf1, CED4, and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD-like) receptors (NLRs) and belongs to the STAND (signal transduction ATPases with numerous domains) family of nucleoside triphosphatase domains (van der Biezen and Jones, 1998; Leipe et al., 2004; Albrecht and Takken, 2006; Maekawa et al., 2011b). The overall modular architecture of metazoan STAND nucleoside triphosphatase is similar to that of NB-LRR plant immune receptors, but the domains flanking the NB-ARC domain often differ. In NLRs, for example, several N-terminal domains can be found, including caspase-recruiting domains and Pyrin domains (Proell et al., 2008). In the mammalian protein Apaf1, the sensor involved in cytochrome c detection consists of C-terminal WD40 repeats (Zou et al., 1997).In plant NB-LRR resistance proteins, the recognition of a pathogen effector via the LRR domain is thought to switch the conformation of the protein from a closed, autoinhibited “off” state into an open, active “on” state (Lukasik and Takken, 2009). The activation of NB-LRR proteins is most likely a multistep process in which the NB-ARC domain plays a central role. The three subdomains of the NB-ARC, the NB, ARC1, and ARC2, collectively form a nucleotide-binding pocket that adopts different conformations depending on the bound nucleotide. This mechanism seems to be conserved between proteins from organisms as distant as bacteria, metazoans, and plants (Rairdan and Moffett, 2007; Danot et al., 2009; Takken and Tameling, 2009). The conformational change coincides with the exchange of bound ADP for ATP in the NB-ARC, probably stabilizing the active conformation (Tameling et al., 2006; Ade et al., 2007). Hydrolysis of the bound ATP is hypothesized to return the domains to their inactive state. The exact mechanism by which elicitor recognition via the LRR leads to a conformational change of the NB-ARC and the subsequent activation of immune signaling pathways is not clear.Previous studies have shown that the CC/TIR, NB-ARC, and LRR domains in plant immune receptors interact and cooperate with each other in an interdependent manner (Moffett et al., 2002; Leister et al., 2005; Ade et al., 2007; Rairdan et al., 2008). From these data, a picture emerges in which the LRR domain is not only involved in pathogen recognition, but also plays a role in maintaining an autoinhibited resting state in the absence of pathogens via its interactions with the other domains (Bendahmane et al., 2002; Hwang and Williamson, 2003; Ade et al., 2007; Qi et al., 2012). A similar role as regulatory domain has been found for the sensor domains of other NLRs, such as the mammalian Apaf1 (Hu et al., 1998). For the potato (Solanum tuberosum) immune receptor Rx1, a model plant NB-LRR protein, it has been shown that the LRR cooperates with the ARC subdomains in retaining the inactive state of the protein. The deletion of the ARC and LRR domains leads to a constitutive activity of the NB (Bendahmane et al., 2002; Rairdan et al., 2008). In addition, it was demonstrated that the elicitor, the Potato virus X (PVX) coat protein, modifies the interdomain interactions in Rx1 (Moffett et al., 2002; Rairdan et al., 2008). Sequence exchanges between Rx1 and the highly homologous nematode resistance protein Gpa2 (88% amino acid identity) resulted in incompatibilities between the domains that give rise to inappropriate activation of cell death responses (Rairdan and Moffett, 2006), indicating that the cooperation between the sensor and switch domains depends on an interaction fine tuned by intramolecular coevolution. In this light, it is interesting to note that a functional ortholog of Rx1, Rx2 from Solanum acaule, is almost identical to Rx1 in its LRR region but displays a higher similarity to Gpa2 in stretches of its CC-NB-ARC sequence (Bendahmane et al., 2000).The aim of our study was to pinpoint the molecular determinants controlling the switch between the resting and activation state of NB-LRR proteins. The incompatibility between the ARC and LRR domains of Rx1 and Gpa2 was used as a guideline to dissect the molecular and structural determinants involved in the cooperation between the switch (NB-ARC) and sensor (LRR) domain. An extensive exchange of polymorphic residues between these two homologous NB-LRR proteins resulted in the identification of a minimal fragment of 68 amino acid residues in the ARC2 domain and the first LRR repeats as being crucial for proper activation of Gpa2 and Rx1. Within this minimal region, we identified two amino acids that, despite their proximity in the amino acid sequence, differentiate between elicitor-dependent (position 401) and independent activation (position 403). However, structural modeling of the domains shows that the residue at position 403 operates at the interface of the ARC2 and N-terminal part of the LRR domain, while residue 401 mapped at the interface between the ARC2 and NB domain. Furthermore, an acidic loop region in the ARC2 domain and complementary-charged basic patches in the N-terminal half of the LRR domain are shown to be required for the physical interaction between these domains. We demonstrate that the binding between the CC- NB-ARC and LRR domains is disrupted upon elicitor-dependent activation and that the complementary-charged residues are predicted to facilitate reassociation. Two independent docking simulations of the NB-ARC and LRR domain indicate that the LRR domain binds to the NB-ARC domain at the surface formed by the interaction of the ARC2 and NB subdomains. We present a mechanistic model in which the first repeats of the LRR, the ARC2 subdomain, and the NB form a clamp, which governs the shuttling between a closed, autoinhibited “off” state and an open, active “on” state of the resistance protein. Finally, we discuss the consequences of the functional constraints imposed by the interface of the NB, ARC2, and LRR domain for the generation of novel resistance specificities via evolutionary processes and genetic engineering.     

Agrobacterium transient expression system as a tool for the isolation of disease resistance genes: application to the Rx2 locus in potato

Rx2 confers resistance against potato virus X (PVX). To clone Rx2, we developed a system based on Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression of candidate R genes in transgenic tobacco leaves expressing the PVX coat protein elicitor of Rx2-mediated resistance. Using this system, a potato gene eliciting HR specifically in the presence of the elicitor was identified. Based on genetical and functional analysis, it is concluded that the cloned gene is Rx2. The transient expression system is potentially adaptable to cloning of any other resistance gene. The Rx2 locus is on chromosome V of potato and the encoded protein is highly similar to the products of Rx1 and Rxh1 encoded on potato chromosome XII. Rxh1 has been shown elsewhere to encode a potato cyst nematode resistance gene Gpa2. All three proteins are in the leucine zipper-nucleotide binding site-leucine rich repeat class of resistance gene products. Rx1 and Rx2 are functionally identical and are almost identical in the C terminal region consistent with a role of the leucine rich repeats in recognition of the PVX coat protein. In the N terminal, half there are some regions where the Rx1 and Rx2 proteins are more similar to each other than to the Rxh1 protein. However, in other regions these proteins are more similar to Rxh1 than to each other. Based on this mosaic pattern of sequence similarity, we conclude that sequence exchange occurs repeatedly between genetically unlinked disease resistance genes through a process of gene conversion.     

Nucleocytoplasmic distribution is required for activation of resistance by the potato NB-LRR receptor Rx1 and is balanced by its functional domains

The Rx1 protein, as many resistance proteins of the nucleotide binding-leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR) class, is predicted to be cytoplasmic because it lacks discernable nuclear targeting signals. Here, we demonstrate that Rx1, which confers extreme resistance to Potato virus X, is located both in the nucleus and cytoplasm. Manipulating the nucleocytoplasmic distribution of Rx1 or its elicitor revealed that Rx1 is activated in the cytoplasm and cannot be activated in the nucleus. The coiled coil (CC) domain was found to be required for accumulation of Rx1 in the nucleus, whereas the LRR domain promoted the localization in the cytoplasm. Analyses of structural subdomains of the CC domain revealed no autonomous signals responsible for active nuclear import. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching and nuclear fractionation indicated that the CC domain binds transiently to large complexes in the nucleus. Disruption of the Rx1 resistance function and protein conformation by mutating the ATP binding phosphate binding loop in the NB domain, or by silencing the cochaperone SGT1, impaired the accumulation of Rx1 protein in the nucleus, while Rx1 versions lacking the LRR domain were not affected in this respect. Our results support a model in which interdomain interactions and folding states determine the nucleocytoplasmic distribution of Rx1.     

A RanGAP protein physically interacts with the NB-LRR protein Rx, and is required for Rx-mediated viral resistance

Race-specific disease resistance in plants is mediated by the products of host disease resistance (R) genes. Plant genomes possess hundreds of R gene homologs encoding nucleotide-binding and leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR) proteins. NB-LRR proteins induce a disease resistance response following recognition of pathogen-encoded avirulence (Avr) proteins. However, little is known about the general mechanisms by which NB-LRR proteins recognize Avr proteins or how they subsequently induce defense responses. The Rx NB-LRR protein of potato confers resistance to potato virus X (PVX). Using a co-purification strategy, we have identified a Ran GTPase-activating protein (RanGAP2) as an Rx-interacting protein. We show by co-immunoprecipitation that this interaction is mediated in planta through the putative signaling domain at the Rx amino terminus. Overexpression of RanGAP2 results in activation of certain Rx derivatives. Likewise, knocking down RanGAP2 expression in Nicotiana benthamiana by virus-induced gene silencing compromises Rx-mediated resistance to PVX. Thus, we have demonstrated a novel role for a RanGAP in the function of a plant disease resistance response.     

RanGAP2 mediates nucleocytoplasmic partitioning of the NB-LRR immune receptor Rx in the Solanaceae, thereby dictating Rx function

The potato (Solanum tuberosum) nucleotide binding-leucine-rich repeat immune receptor Rx confers resistance to Potato virus X (PVX) and requires Ran GTPase-activating protein 2 (RanGAP2) for effective immune signaling. Although Rx does not contain a discernible nuclear localization signal, the protein localizes to both the cytoplasm and nucleus in Nicotiana benthamiana. Transient coexpression of Rx and cytoplasmically localized RanGAP2 sequesters Rx in the cytoplasm. This relocation of the immune receptor appeared to be mediated by the physical interaction between Rx and RanGAP2 and was independent of the concomitant increased GAP activity. Coexpression with RanGAP2 also potentiates Rx-mediated immune signaling, leading to a hypersensitive response (HR) and enhanced resistance to PVX. Besides sequestration, RanGAP2 also stabilizes Rx, a process that likely contributes to enhanced defense signaling. Strikingly, coexpression of Rx with the Rx-interacting WPP domain of RanGAP2 fused to a nuclear localization signal leads to hyperaccumulation of both the WPP domain and Rx in the nucleus. As a consequence, both Rx-mediated resistance to PVX and the HR induced by auto-active Rx mutants are significantly suppressed. These data show that a balanced nucleocytoplasmic partitioning of Rx is required for proper regulation of defense signaling. Furthermore, our data indicate that RanGAP2 regulates this partitioning by serving as a cytoplasmic retention factor for Rx.     

Molecular genetic evidence for the role of SGT1 in the intramolecular complementation of Bs2 protein activity in Nicotiana benthamiana

Pepper plants (Capsicum annuum) containing the Bs2 resistance gene are resistant to strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv vesicatoria (Xcv) expressing the bacterial effector protein AvrBs2. AvrBs2 is delivered directly to the plant cell via the type III protein secretion system (TTSS) of Xcv. Upon recognition of AvrBs2 by plants expressing the Bs2 gene, a signal transduction cascade is activated leading to a bacterial disease resistance response. Here, we describe a novel pathosystem that consists of epitope-tagged Bs2-expressing transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana plants and engineered strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv tabaci that deliver the effector domain of the Xcv AvrBs2 protein via the TTSS of P. syringae. This pathosystem has allowed us to exploit N. benthamiana as a model host plant to use Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient protein expression in conjunction with virus-induced gene silencing to validate genes and to identify protein interactions required for the expression of plant host resistance. In this study, we demonstrate that two genes, NbSGT1 and NbNPK1, are required for the Bs2/AvrBs2-mediated resistance responses but that NbRAR1 is not. Protein localization studies in these plants indicate that full-length Bs2 is primarily localized in the plant cytoplasm. Three protein domains of Bs2 have been identified: the N terminus, a central nucleotide binding site, and a C-terminal Leu-rich repeat (LRR). Co-immunoprecipitation studies demonstrate that separate epitope-tagged Bs2 domain constructs interact in trans specifically in the plant cell. Co-immunoprecipitation studies also demonstrate that an NbSGT1-dependent intramolecular interaction is required for Bs2 function. Additionally, Bs2 has been shown to associate with SGT1 via the LRR domain of Bs2. These data suggest a role for SGT1 in the proper folding of Bs2 or the formation of a Bs2-SGT1-containing protein complex that is required for the expression of bacterial disease resistance.     

Physical association of the NB-LRR resistance protein Rx with a Ran GTPase-activating protein is required for extreme resistance to Potato virus X

Nucleotide binding leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR) proteins play an important role in plant and mammalian innate immunity. In plants, these resistance proteins recognize specific pathogen-derived effector proteins. Recognition subsequently triggers a rapid and efficient defense response often associated with the hypersensitive response and other poorly understood processes that suppress the pathogen. To investigate mechanisms associated with the activation of disease resistance responses, we investigated proteins binding to the potato (Solanum tuberosum) NB-LRR protein Rx that confers extreme resistance to Potato virus X (PVX) in potato and Nicotiana benthamiana. By affinity purification experiments, we identified an endogenous N. benthamiana Ran GTPase-Activating Protein2 (RanGAP2) as an Rx-associated protein in vivo. Further characterization confirmed the specificity of this interaction and showed that the association occurs through their N-terminal domains. By specific virus-induced gene silencing of RanGAP2 in N. benthamiana carrying Rx, we demonstrated that this interaction is required for extreme resistance to PVX and suggest that RanGAP2 is part of the Rx signaling complex. These results implicate RanGAP-mediated cellular mechanisms, including nucleocytoplasmic trafficking, in the activation of disease resistance.     

Constitutive gain-of-function mutants in a nucleotide binding site-leucine rich repeat protein encoded at the Rx locus of potato

Rx in potato encodes a protein with a nucleotide binding site (NBS) and leucine-rich repeats (LRR) that confers resistance against Potato virus X. The NBS and LRR domains in Rx are present in many disease resistance proteins in plants and in regulators of apoptosis in animals. To investigate structure-function relationships of NBS-LRR proteins we exploited the potential of Rx to mediate a cell death response. With wild-type Rx cell death is elicited only in the presence of the viral coat protein. However, following random mutagenesis of Rx, we identified mutants in which cell death is activated in the absence of viral coat protein. Out of 2500 Rx clones tested there were seven constitutive gain-of-function mutants carrying eight independent mutations. The mutations encoded changes in the LRR or in conserved RNBS-D and MHD motifs of the NBS. Based on these findings we propose that there are inhibitory domains in the NBS and LRR. The constitutive gain-of-function phenotypes would be due to deletion or modification of these inhibitory domains. However activation of Rx is not simply release of negative regulation by the LRR and adjacent sequence because deleted forms of Rx that lack constitutive gain of function mutations are not active unless the protein is overexpressed.     

Structural Basis for the Interaction between the Potato Virus X Resistance Protein (Rx) and Its Cofactor Ran GTPase-activating Protein 2 (RanGAP2)

The potato (Solanum tuberosum) disease resistance protein Rx has a modular arrangement that contains coiled-coil (CC), nucleotide-binding (NB), and leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domains and mediates resistance to potato virus X. The Rx N-terminal CC domain undergoes an intramolecular interaction with the Rx NB-LRR region and an intermolecular interaction with the Rx cofactor RanGAP2 (Ran GTPase-activating protein 2). Here, we report the crystal structure of the Rx CC domain in complex with the Trp-Pro-Pro (WPP) domain of RanGAP2. The structure reveals that the Rx CC domain forms a heterodimer with RanGAP2, in striking contrast to the homodimeric structure of the CC domain of the barley disease resistance protein MLA10. Structure-based mutagenesis identified residues from both the Rx CC domain and the RanGAP2 WPP domain that are crucial for their interaction and function in vitro and in vivo. Our results reveal the molecular mechanism underlying the interaction of Rx with RanGAP2 and identify the distinct surfaces of the Rx CC domain that are involved in intramolecular and intermolecular interactions.     

A novel role for the TIR domain in association with pathogen-derived elicitors

Plant innate immunity is mediated by Resistance (R) proteins, which bear a striking resemblance to animal molecules of similar function. Tobacco N is a TIR-NB-LRR R gene that confers resistance to Tobacco mosaic virus, specifically the p50 helicase domain. An intriguing question is how plant R proteins recognize the presence of pathogen-derived Avirulence (Avr) elicitor proteins. We have used biochemical cell fraction and immunoprecipitation in addition to confocal fluorescence microscopy of living tissue to examine the association between N and p50. Surprisingly, both N and p50 are cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins, and N's nuclear localization is required for its function. We also demonstrate an in planta association between N and p50. Further, we show that N's TIR domain is critical for this association, and indeed, it alone can associate with p50. Our results differ from current models for plant innate immunity that propose detection is mediated solely through the LRR domains of these molecules. The data we present support an intricate process of pathogen elicitor recognition by R proteins involving multiple subcellular compartments and the formation of multiple protein complexes.     

Multiple regions of NSR1 are sufficient for accumulation of a fusion protein within the nucleolus

NSR1, a 67-kD nucleolar protein, was originally identified in our laboratory as a nuclear localization signal binding protein, and has subsequently been found to be involved in ribosome biogenesis. NSR1 has three regions: an acidic/serine-rich NH2 terminus, two RNA recognition motifs, and a glycine/arginine-rich COOH terminus. In this study we show that NSR1 itself has a bipartite nuclear localization sequence. Deletion of either basic amino acid stretch results in the mislocation of NSR1 to the cytoplasm. We further demonstrate that either of two regions, the NH2 terminus or both RNA recognition motifs, are sufficient to localize a bacterial protein, beta-galactosidase, to the nucleolus. Intensive deletion analysis has further defined a specific acidic/serine-rich region within the NH2 terminus as necessary for nucleolar accumulation rather than nucleolar targeting. In addition, deletion of either RNA recognition motif or point mutations in one of the RNP consensus octamers results in the mislocalization of a fusion protein within the nucleus. Although the glycine/arginine-rich region in the COOH terminus is not sufficient to bring beta-galactosidase to the nucleolus, our studies show that this domain is necessary for nucleolar accumulation when an RNP consensus octamer in one of the RNA recognition motifs is mutated. Our findings are consistent with the notion that nucleolar localization is a result of the binding interactions of various domains of NSR1 within the nucleolus rather than the presence of a specific nucleolar targeting signal.     

Intramolecular Interaction Influences Binding of the Flax L5 and L6 Resistance Proteins to their AvrL567 Ligands

L locus resistance (R) proteins are nucleotide binding (NB-ARC) leucine-rich repeat (LRR) proteins from flax (Linum usitatissimum) that provide race-specific resistance to the causal agent of flax rust disease, Melampsora lini. L5 and L6 are two alleles of the L locus that directly recognize variants of the fungal effector AvrL567. In this study, we have investigated the molecular details of this recognition by site-directed mutagenesis of AvrL567 and construction of chimeric L proteins. Single, double and triple mutations of polymorphic residues in a variety of AvrL567 variants showed additive effects on recognition strength, suggesting that multiple contact points are involved in recognition. Domain-swap experiments between L5 and L6 show that specificity differences are determined by their corresponding LRR regions. Most positively selected amino acid sites occur in the N- and C-terminal LRR units, and polymorphisms in the first seven and last four LRR units contribute to recognition specificity of L5 and L6 respectively. This further confirms that multiple, additive contact points occur between AvrL567 variants and either L5 or L6. However, we also observed that recognition of AvrL567 is affected by co-operative polymorphisms between both adjacent and distant domains of the R protein, including the TIR, ARC and LRR domains, implying that these residues are involved in intramolecular interactions to optimize detection of the pathogen and defense signal activation. We suggest a model where Avr ligand interaction directly competes with intramolecular interactions to cause activation of the R protein.     

The helicase domain of phage P4 alpha protein overlaps the specific DNA binding domain.

Replication initiation depends on origin recognition, helicase, and primase activities. In phage P4, a second DNA region, the cis replication region (crr), is also required for replication initiation. The multifunctional alpha protein of phage P4, which is essential for DNA replication, combines the three aforementioned activities on a single polypeptide chain. Protein domains responsible for the activities were identified by mutagenesis. We show that mutations of residues G506 and K507 are defective in vivo in phage propagation and in unwinding of a forked helicase substrate. This finding indicates that the proposed P loop is essential for helicase activity. Truncations of gene product alpha (gp alpha) demonstrated that 142 residues of the C terminus are sufficient for specifically binding ori and crr DNA. The minimal binding domain retains gp alpha's ability to induce loop formation between ori and crr. In vitro and in vivo analysis of short C-terminal truncations indicate that the C terminus is needed for helicase activity as well as for specific DNA binding.     

Perturbation of nuclear–cytosolic shuttling of Rx1 compromises extreme resistance and translational arrest of potato virus X transcripts

Many plant intracellular immune receptors mount a hypersensitive response (HR) upon pathogen perception. The concomitant localized cell death is proposed to trap pathogens, such as viruses, inside infected cells, thereby preventing their spread. Notably, extreme resistance (ER) conferred by the potato immune receptor Rx1 to potato virus X (PVX) does not involve the death of infected cells. It is unknown what defines ER and how it differs from HR-based resistance. Interestingly, Rx1 can trigger an HR, but only upon artificial (over)expression of PVX or its avirulence coat protein (CP). Rx1 has a nucleocytoplasmic distribution and both pools are required for HR upon transient expression of a PVX-GFP amplicon. It is unknown whether mislocalized Rx1 variants can induce ER upon natural PVX infection. Here, we generated transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana producing nuclear- or cytosol-restricted Rx1 variants. We found that these variants can still mount an HR. However, nuclear- or cytosol-restricted Rx1 variants can no longer trigger ER or restricts viral infection. Interestingly, unlike the mislocalized Rx1 variants, wild-type Rx1 was found to compromise CP protein accumulation. We show that the lack of CP accumulation does not result from its degradation but is likely to be linked with translational arrest of its mRNA. Together, our findings suggest that translational arrest of viral genes is a major component of ER and, unlike the HR, is required for resistance to PVX.     

Structure-function analysis of the coiled-coil and leucine-rich repeat domains of the RPS5 disease resistance protein

The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) RESISTANCE TO PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE5 (RPS5) disease resistance protein mediates recognition of the Pseudomonas syringae effector protein AvrPphB. RPS5 belongs to the coiled-coil-nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat (CC-NBS-LRR) family and is activated by AvrPphB-mediated cleavage of the protein kinase PBS1. Here, we present a structure-function analysis of the CC and LRR domains of RPS5 using transient expression assays in Nicotiana benthamiana. We found that substituting the CC domain of RPS2 for the RPS5 CC domain did not alter RPS5 specificity and only moderately reduced its ability to activate programmed cell death, suggesting that the CC domain does not play a direct role in the recognition of PBS1 cleavage. Analysis of an RPS5-super Yellow Fluorescent Protein fusion revealed that RPS5 localizes to the plasma membrane (PM). Alanine substitutions of predicted myristoylation (glycine-2) and palmitoylation (cysteine-4) residues affected RPS5 PM localization, protein stability, and function in an additive manner, indicating that PM localization is essential to RPS5 function. The first 20 amino acids of RPS5 were sufficient for directing super Yellow Fluorescent Protein to the PM. C-terminal truncations of RPS5 revealed that the first four LRR repeats are sufficient for inhibiting RPS5 autoactivation; however, the complete LRR domain was required for the recognition of PBS1 cleavage. Substitution of the RPS2 LRR domain resulted in the autoactivation of RPS5, indicating that the LRR domain must coevolve with the NBS domain. We conclude that the RPS5 LRR domain functions to suppress RPS5 activation in the absence of PBS1 cleavage and promotes RPS5 activation in its presence.     

Eukaryotic initiation factors 4G and 4A mediate conformational changes downstream of the initiation codon of the encephalomyocarditis virus internal ribosomal entry site

Initiation of translation of encephalomyocarditis virus mRNA is mediated by an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) comprising structural domains H, I, J-K, and L immediately upstream of the initiation codon AUG at nucleotide 834 (AUG834). Assembly of 48S ribosomal complexes on the IRES requires eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2), eIF3, eIF4A, and the central domain of eIF4G to which eIF4A binds. Footprinting experiments confirmed that eIF4G binds a three-way helical junction in the J-K domain and showed that it interacts extensively with RNA duplexes in the J-K and L domains. Deletion of apical hairpins in the J and K domains synergistically impaired the binding of eIF4G and IRES function. Directed hydroxyl radical probing, done by using Fe(II) tethered to surface residues in eIF4G's central domain, indicated that it is oriented with its N terminus towards the base of domain J and its C terminus towards the apex. eIF4G recruits eIF4A to a defined location on the IRES, and the eIF4G/eIF4A complex caused localized ATP-independent conformational changes in the eIF4G-binding region of the IRES. This complex also induced more extensive conformational rearrangements at the 3' border of the ribosome binding site that required ATP and active eIF4A. We propose that these conformational changes prepare the region flanking AUG834 for productive binding of the ribosome.