Restoration of miR-101 suppresses lung tumorigenesis through inhibition of DNMT3a-dependent DNA methylation

The deregulation of miR-101 and DNMT3a has been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple tumor types, but whether and how miR-101 silencing and DNMT3a overexpression contribute to lung tumorigenesis remain elusive. Here we show that miR-101 downregulation associates with DNMT3a overexpression in lung cancer cell lines and patient tissues. Ectopic miR-101 expression remarkably abrogated the DNMT3a 3′-UTR luciferase activity corresponding to the miR-101 binding site and caused an attenuated expression of endogenous DNMT3a, which led to a reduction of global DNA methylation and the re-expression of tumor suppressor CDH1 via its promoter DNA hypomethylation. Functionally, restoration of miR-101 expression suppressed lung cancer cell clonability and migration, which recapitulated the DNMT3a knockdown effects. Interestingly, miR-101 synergized with decitabine to downregulate DNMT3a and to reduce DNA methylation. Importantly, ectopic miR-101 expression was sufficient to trigger in vivo lung tumor regression and the blockage of metastasis. Consistent with these phenotypes, examination of xenograft tumors disclosed an increase of miR-101, a decrease of DNMT3a and the subsequent DNA demethylation. These findings support that the loss or suppression of miR-101 function accelerates lung tumorigenesis through DNMT3a-dependent DNA methylation, and suggest that miR-101-DNMT3a axis may have therapeutic value in treating refractory lung cancer.Owing to a high propensity for recurrence and a high rate of metastasis at the advanced stages,^{1, 2, 3} lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. DNA methylation is a major epigenetic rule controlling chromosomal stability and gene expression.^{4, 5} It is under control of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), whose overexpression in lung cancer cells predicts worse outcomes.^{6, 7} It is postulated that DNMT overexpression induces DNA hypermethylation and silencing of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs), leading to an aggressive lung cancer. Indeed, enforced expression of DNMT1 or DNMT3a increases DNA methylation, while the abolition of DNMT expression by genetic depletion, microRNAs (miRs) or small molecules reduces genome-wide and gene-specific DNA methylation and restores TSG expression.^{8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13} As TSGs are the master controllers for cell multiplicity and their silencing predicts poor prognosis,^{14, 15} TSG re-expression via promoter DNA hypomethylation inhibits cell proliferation and induces cell differentiation.^{13, 16} Thus, DNMT gene abundance could serve as a target for anticancer therapy, but how DNMT upregulation occurs in lung cancer is incompletely understood.MiRs are small non-coding RNAs that crucially regulate target gene expression. Up to 30% of all protein-coding genes are predicted to be targeted by miRs,^{17, 18} supporting the key roles of miRs in controlling cell fate.^{19, 20, 21, 22} Research is showing that certain miRs are frequently dysregulated in cancers, including lung cancer.^{7, 23, 24} As miR targets can promote or inhibit cancer cell expansion, miRs have huge potential for acting as bona fide oncogenes (i.e., miR-21) or TSGs (i.e., miR-29b).^{7, 25} We and others demonstrated that the levels of DNMT1 or DNMT3a or DNMT3b are regulated by miR-29b, miR-148, miR-152 or miR-30c,^{7, 13, 26, 27} and overexpression of these miRs results in DNA hypomethylation and TSG reactivation with the concurrent blockage of cancer cell proliferation.^{7, 13} These findings underscore the importance of miRs as epigenetic modulators and highlight their therapeutic applications.MiR-101 is frequently silenced in human cancers^{28, 29, 30, 31} and, importantly, exhibits antitumorigenic properties when overexpressed. Mechanistically, miR-101 inactivation by genomic loss causes the overexpression of EZH2, a histone methyltransferase, via 3′-UTR targeting, which is followed by histone hypermethylation and aggressive tumorigenesis.^{29, 30, 32} However, whether and how miR-101 silencing contributes to DNA hypermethylation patterning in lung cancer is unclear. In this study, we explore the role of miR-101 in regulating DNMT3a expression and the impacts of miR-101-DNMT3a nexus on lung cancer pathogenesis. We showed that the expression of miR-101 and DNMT3a was negatively correlated in lung cancer. We presented evidence that ectopic miR-101 expression decreased DNMT3a levels, reduced global DNA methylation and upregulated CDH1 via its promoter DNA demethylation. The biological significance of miR-101-mediated DNA hypomethylation and CDH1 re-expression was evident by its inhibition of lung tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Thus, our findings mechanistically and functionally link miR-101 silencing to DNA hypermethylation in lung cancer cells.     

4-cholesten-3-one suppresses lung adenocarcinoma metastasis by regulating translocation of HMGB1, HIF1α and Caveolin-1

Metastasis is a great challenge in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) therapy. Cholesterol has been implicated in ADC metastasis. 4-cholesten-3-one, as cholesterol metabolite and analog, can substitute membrane cholesterol and increase membrane fluidity. In this study, we explored the possibility that 4-cholesten-3-one inhibited ADC metastasis. Low-dose 4-cholesten-3-one significantly restrained ADC cells migration and invasion with little effects on cells viabilities. Further investigation showed that 4-cholesten-3-one promoted ROS generation, which transiently activated AMPKα1, increased HIF1α expression, reduced Bcl-2 expression and caused autophagy. AMPKα1 knockdown partly suppressed 4-cholesten-3-one-induced autophagy but, neither prevented 4-cholesten-3-one-induced upregulation of HIF1α or downregulation of Bcl-2. 4-cholesten-3-one-induced autophagy facilitated the release of HMGB1 from nuclei to cytoplasm, blocking nuclear translocation of HIF1α and activation of MMP2 and MMP9. Also, 4-cholesten-3-one induced time-dependent phosphorylation of caveolin-1, Akt and NF-κB. With increasing treatment time, 4-cholesten-3-one accelerated caveolin-1 internalization, but reduced the phosphorylation of Akt and NF-κB, and inhibited the expression of snail and twist. These data suggested that 4-cholesten-3-one could be a potential candidate for anti-metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma.Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death globally, with an estimated incidence of 1.3 million new cases every year.¹ Lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) is the main common subtype of lung cancer. The high mortality of ADC is mainly attributed to early metastasis.² Because metastasis is a complex and multistep process, the molecular mechanisms of ADC metastasis remain largely unknown.Malignant cells migration is an early event of metastasis, followed by intravasation, survival in the circulation, extravasation and colonization at distant target organs.³ Recent studies have found the connection between cholesterol metabolism and metastases.^{4, 5, 6} Diet-induced hypercholesterolemia accelerates prostate cancer metastases to lymph node, lung and bones.⁷ Inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis hampers the metastases of colon carcinoma and pancreatic ADC.^{8, 9} The cholesterol metabolite 27-hydroxycholesterol promotes breast cancer metastasis by activating liver X receptor.¹⁰ Cholesterol as an essential component of lipid rafts impacts diverse signaling molecules that mediate multiple biological functions, such as cell survival and death.¹¹ A series of evidences have confirmed that the depletion of membrane cholesterol disrupts lipid rafts, resulting in cell apoptosis.^{12, 13, 14} Elevated cholesterol level has been found in various tumors, including prostate, lung, acute myeloid leukemia and breast cancer,^{15, 16, 17, 18} especially in chemoresistant tumors.^{19, 20} Cholesterol accumulation in solid tumors promotes the proliferation, differentiation and migration of tumor cells by mediating cellular surface molecules, such as caveolin-1 translocation.²¹ Depletion of membrane cholesterol suppresses the phosphorylation of Akt and ERK.^{22, 23} Furthermore, membrane cholesterol depletion also restrains the expression of BCL-2 family members.²⁴ Thus, dysregulated cholesterol metabolism is likely to be implicated in tumor metastases through related signaling pathway.Our previous results suggest that cholesterol oxidation by cholesterol oxidase from Bordetella species (COD-B) promotes the irreversible apoptosis of ADC cells.²⁵ COD-B as a microbial flavoprotein can oxidize cholesterol to 4-cholesten-3-one. In this study, we further investigated whether 4-cholesten-3-one influenced ADC metastasis. We evidenced that low-dose 4-cholesten-3-one inhibited ADC migration in vitro and metastasis in vivo by inducing the translocations of HMGB1, HIF1α and caveolin-1. Our data demonstrated that translocations of HMGB1 and HIF1α had key roles in ADC metastasis.     

Extracellular DNA Is Required for Root Tip Resistance to Fungal Infection

Plant defense involves a complex array of biochemical interactions, many of which occur in the extracellular environment. The apical 1- to 2-mm root tip housing apical and root cap meristems is resistant to infection by most pathogens, so growth and gravity sensing often proceed normally even when other sites on the root are invaded. The mechanism of this resistance is unknown but appears to involve a mucilaginous matrix or “slime” composed of proteins, polysaccharides, and detached living cells called “border cells.” Here, we report that extracellular DNA (exDNA) is a component of root cap slime and that exDNA degradation during inoculation by a fungal pathogen results in loss of root tip resistance to infection. Most root tips (>95%) escape infection even when immersed in inoculum from the root-rotting pathogen Nectria haematococca. By contrast, 100% of inoculated root tips treated with DNase I developed necrosis. Treatment with BAL31, an exonuclease that digests DNA more slowly than DNase I, also resulted in increased root tip infection, but the onset of infection was delayed. Control root tips or fungal spores treated with nuclease alone exhibited normal morphology and growth. Pea (Pisum sativum) root tips incubated with [³²P]dCTP during a 1-h period when no cell death occurs yielded root cap slime containing ³²P-labeled exDNA. Our results suggest that exDNA is a previously unrecognized component of plant defense, an observation that is in accordance with the recent discovery that exDNA from white blood cells plays a key role in the vertebrate immune response against microbial pathogens.Root diseases caused by soil-borne plant pathogens are a perennial source of crop loss worldwide (Bruehl, 1986; Curl and Truelove, 1986). These diseases are of increasing concern, as pesticides like methyl bromide are removed from the market due to environmental concerns (Gilreath et al., 2005). One possible alternative means of crop protection is to exploit natural mechanisms of root disease resistance (Nelson, 1990; Goswami and Punja, 2008; Shittu et al., 2009). Direct observation of root systems under diverse conditions has revealed that root tips, in general, are resistant to infection even when lesions are initiated elsewhere on the same plant root (Foster et al., 1983; Bruehl, 1986; Curl and Truelove, 1986; Smith et al., 1992; Gunawardena et al., 2005; Wen et al., 2007). This form of disease resistance is important for crop production because root growth and its directional movement in response to gravity, water, and other signals can proceed normally as long as the root tip is not invaded. The 1- to 2-mm apical region of roots houses the root meristems required for root growth and cap development, and when infection does occur, root development ceases irreversibly within a few hours even in the absence of severe necrosis (Gunawardena and Hawes, 2002). Mechanisms underlying root tip resistance to infection are unclear, but the phenomenon appears to involve root cap “slime,” a mucilaginous matrix produced by the root cap (Morré et al., 1967; Rougier et al., 1979; Foster, 1982; Chaboud, 1983; Guinel and McCully, 1986; Moody et al., 1988; Knee et al., 2001; Barlow, 2003; Iijima et al., 2008). Within the root cap slime of cereals, legumes, and most other crop species are specialized populations of living cells called root “border cells” (Supplemental Fig. S1; Hawes et al., 2000). Border cell numbers increase in response to pathogens and toxins such as aluminum, and the cell populations maintain a high rate of metabolic activity even after detachment from the root cap periphery (Brigham et al., 1995; Miyasaka and Hawes, 2000).As border cells detach from roots of cereals and legumes, a complex of more than 100 proteins, termed the root cap secretome, is synthesized and exported from living cells into the matrix ensheathing the root tip (Brigham et al., 1995). The profile of secreted proteins changes in response to challenge with soil-borne bacteria (De-la-Peña et al., 2008). In pea (Pisum sativum), root tip resistance to infection is abolished in response to proteolytic degradation of the root cap secretome (Wen et al., 2007). In addition to an array of antimicrobial enzymes and other proteins known to be components of the extracellular matrix and apoplast of higher plants, the DNA-binding protein histone H4 unexpectedly was found to be present among the secreted proteins (Wen et al., 2007). One explanation for the presence of histone is global leakage of material from disrupted nuclei in dead cells, but no cell death occurs during delivery of the secretome (Brigham et al., 1995; Wen et al., 2007). An alternative explanation for the presence of a secreted DNA-binding protein is that extracellular DNA (exDNA) also is present in root cap slime.exDNA has long been known to be a component of slimy biological matrices ranging from purulent localized human infections to bacterial capsules, biofilms, and snail exudate (Sherry and Goeller, 1950; Leuchtenberger and Schrader, 1952; Braun and Whallon, 1954; Smithies and Gibbons, 1955; Catlin, 1956; Fahy et al., 1993; Allesen-Holm et al., 2006; Spoering and Gilmore, 2006; Qin et al., 2007; Izano et al., 2008). Specialized white blood cells in humans and other species including fish recently have been shown to deploy a complex neutrophil extracellular “trap” (NET), composed of DNA and a collection of enzymes, in response to infection (Brinkmann et al., 2004; Brinkmann and Zychlinsky, 2007; Palić et al., 2007; Wartha et al., 2007; Yousefi et al., 2008). NETs appear to kill bacterial, fungal, and protozoan pathogens by localizing them within a matrix of antimicrobial peptides and proteins (Urban et al., 2006; Wartha et al., 2007; Guimaraes-Costa et al., 2009). Several extracellular peptides and proteins implicated in neutrophil function, including histone, also are present within the pea root cap secretome (Wen et al., 2007). exDNA linked with extracellular histone is a structural component of NETs, and treatment with DNase destroys NET integrity and function (Wartha et al., 2007). Moreover, human pathogens including group A Streptococcus and Streptococcus pneumoniae release extracellular DNase (Sherry and Goeller, 1950). When these activities are eliminated by mutagenesis of the encoding genes, bacteria lose their normal ability to escape the NET and multiply at the site of infection (Sumby et al., 2005; Buchanan et al., 2006). Here, we report that, in addition to histone and other secretome proteins, exDNA also is a component of root cap slime. When this exDNA is digested enzymatically, root tip resistance to infection is abolished.     

Cancer cell death induced by novel small molecules degrading the TACC3 protein via the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway

The selective degradation of target proteins with small molecules is a novel approach to the treatment of various diseases, including cancer. We have developed a protein knockdown system with a series of hybrid small compounds that induce the selective degradation of target proteins via the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway. In this study, we designed and synthesized novel small molecules called SNIPER(TACC3)s, which target the spindle regulatory protein transforming acidic coiled-coil-3 (TACC3). SNIPER(TACC3)s induce poly-ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation of TACC3 and reduce the TACC3 protein level in cells. Mechanistic analysis indicated that the ubiquitin ligase APC/C^CDH1 mediates the SNIPER(TACC3)-induced degradation of TACC3. Intriguingly, SNIPER(TACC3) selectively induced cell death in cancer cells expressing a larger amount of TACC3 protein than normal cells. These results suggest that protein knockdown of TACC3 by SNIPER(TACC3) is a potential strategy for treating cancers overexpressing the TACC3 protein.Inhibitors of microtubule polymerization or depolymerization such as Vinca alkaloids and taxanes, respectively, are widely used as anti-cancer drugs. They arrest cancer cells, inducing mitotic catastrophe and cancer cell death. However, these drugs also affect microtubule function in non-dividing cells and have serious side effects, such as peripheral neuropathy, which limit their utility.¹ Recently, inhibitors of spindle-regulatory proteins, such as mitotic kinases (Aurora kinases and Polo-like kinases) and a motor protein (Eg5/Ksp) have attracted considerable attention, but they have not been developed clinical use yet.^{2, 3}Transforming acidic coiled-coil-3 (TACC3) is another spindle-regulatory protein.^{4, 5} During mitosis, TACC3 localizes to the mitotic spindle and has a critical role in spindle assembly, chromosomal function and mitotic progression.^{6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11} Studies using microarray and immunohistochemical analysis showed that TACC3 is overexpressed in many human cancers, including ovarian cancer, breast cancer, squamous cell carcinoma and lymphoma.^{12, 13, 14} Depletion of TACC3 results in chromosome alignment defects, multi-polar spindle formation, mitotic cell death and/or a postmitotic cell cycle arrest.^{15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20} Additionally, conditional disruption of TACC3 has been shown to regress thymic lymphomas in p53-deficient mice without inducing any overt abnormalities in normal tissues.²¹ These findings suggest that TACC3 is a molecular target for anti-cancer drug discovery.The development of a strategy for the selective degradation may be a useful approach to the discovery of novel drugs. Based on the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS), we have devised a protein knockdown system for inducing the selective degradation of target proteins by using specifically designed hybrid small compounds.^{22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29} These compounds, which we have termed SNIPER (Specific and Non-genetic IAP-dependent Protein ERaser), are composed of two different ligands connected by a linker; one is a ligand for cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein 1 (cIAP1) and the other a ligand for the target protein. Accordingly, SNIPER is expected to crosslink the ubiquitin–ligase cIAP1 and the target protein in the cells, thereby inducing ubiquitylation and, ultimately, proteasomal degradation of the target protein. To date, we have constructed SNIPERs that target cellular retinoic acid binding protein-II (CRABP-II) and nuclear receptors such as estrogen receptor α (ERα) for degradation.^{22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28} In this study, we designed and synthesized novel SNIPERs targeting TACC3, that is, SNIPER(TACC3)s, that induce proteasomal degradation of the TACC3 protein. We also show that cancer cells expressing a large amount of the TACC3 protein readily undergo cell death as the result of SNIPER(TACC3) treatment.     

Calcineurin B-Like Protein-Interacting Protein Kinase CIPK21 Regulates Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses in Arabidopsis

The role of calcium-mediated signaling has been extensively studied in plant responses to abiotic stress signals. Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) constitute a complex signaling network acting in diverse plant stress responses. Osmotic stress imposed by soil salinity and drought is a major abiotic stress that impedes plant growth and development and involves calcium-signaling processes. In this study, we report the functional analysis of CIPK21, an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CBL-interacting protein kinase, ubiquitously expressed in plant tissues and up-regulated under multiple abiotic stress conditions. The growth of a loss-of-function mutant of CIPK21, cipk21, was hypersensitive to high salt and osmotic stress conditions. The calcium sensors CBL2 and CBL3 were found to physically interact with CIPK21 and target this kinase to the tonoplast. Moreover, preferential localization of CIPK21 to the tonoplast was detected under salt stress condition when coexpressed with CBL2 or CBL3. These findings suggest that CIPK21 mediates responses to salt stress condition in Arabidopsis, at least in part, by regulating ion and water homeostasis across the vacuolar membranes.Drought and salinity cause osmotic stress in plants and severely affect crop productivity throughout the world. Plants respond to osmotic stress by changing a number of cellular processes (Xiong et al., 1999; Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Boudsocq and Lauriére, 2005). Some of these changes include activation of stress-responsive genes, regulation of membrane transport at both plasma membrane (PM) and vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) to maintain water and ionic homeostasis, and metabolic changes to produce compatible osmolytes such as Pro (Stewart and Lee, 1974; Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). It has been well established that a specific calcium (Ca²⁺) signature is generated in response to a particular environmental stimulus (Trewavas and Malhó, 1998; Scrase-Field and Knight, 2003; Luan, 2009; Kudla et al., 2010). The Ca²⁺ changes are primarily perceived by several Ca²⁺ sensors such as calmodulin (Reddy, 2001; Luan et al., 2002), Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinases (Harper and Harmon, 2005), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Pandey, 2008; Luan, 2009; Sanyal et al., 2015), and other Ca²⁺-binding proteins (Reddy, 2001; Shao et al., 2008) to initiate various cellular responses.Plant CBL-type Ca²⁺ sensors interact with and activate CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) that phosphorylate downstream components to transduce Ca²⁺ signals (Liu et al., 2000; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Luan, 2009). In several plant species, multiple members have been identified in the CBL and CIPK family (Luan et al., 2002; Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Pandey, 2008; Batistič and Kudla, 2009; Weinl and Kudla, 2009; Pandey et al., 2014). Involvement of specific CBL-CIPK pair to decode a particular type of signal entails the alternative and selective complex formation leading to stimulus-response coupling (D’Angelo et al., 2006; Batistič et al., 2010).Several CBL and CIPK family members have been implicated in plant responses to drought, salinity, and osmotic stress based on genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants (Zhu, 2002; Cheong et al., 2003, 2007; Kim et al., 2003; Pandey et al., 2004, 2008; D’Angelo et al., 2006; Qin et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Held et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2012; Drerup et al., 2013; Eckert et al., 2014). A few CIPKs have also been functionally characterized by gain-of-function approach in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), and maize (Zea mays) and were found to be involved in osmotic stress responses (Mahajan et al., 2006; Xiang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009; Cuéllar et al., 2010).In this report, we examined the role of the Arabidopsis CIPK21 gene in osmotic stress response by reverse genetic analysis. The loss-of-function mutant plants became hypersensitive to salt and mannitol stress conditions, suggesting that CIPK21 is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress response in Arabidopsis. These findings are further supported by an enhanced tonoplast targeting of the cytoplasmic CIPK21 through interaction with the vacuolar Ca²⁺ sensors CBL2 and CBL3 under salt stress condition.