Glutathione is recruited into the nucleus in early phases of cell proliferation

We have studied the possible correlation between nuclear glutathione distribution and the progression of the cell cycle. The former was studied by confocal microscopy using 5-chloromethyl fluorescein diacetate and the latter by flow cytometry and protein expression of Id2 and p107. In proliferating cells, when 41% of them were in the S+G(2)/M phase of the cell cycle GSH was located mainly in the nucleus. When cells reached confluence (G(0)/G(1)) GSH was localized in the cytoplasm with a perinuclear distribution. The nucleus/cytoplasm fluorescence ratio for GSH reached a maximal mean value of 4.2 +/- 0.8 at 6 h after cell plating. A ratio higher than 2 was maintained during exponential cell growth. In the G(0)/G(1) phase of the cell cycle, the nucleus/cytoplasm GSH ratio decreased to values close to 1. We report here that cells concentrate GSH in the nucleus in the early phases of cell growth, when most of the cells are in an active division phase, and that GSH redistributes uniformly between the nucleus and the cytoplasm when cells reach confluence.     

Genomewide phenotypic analysis of growth,cell morphogenesis,and cell cycle events in Escherichia coli

Cell size, cell growth, and cell cycle events are necessarily intertwined to achieve robust bacterial replication. Yet, a comprehensive and integrated view of these fundamental processes is lacking. Here, we describe an image‐based quantitative screen of the single‐gene knockout collection of Escherichia coli and identify many new genes involved in cell morphogenesis, population growth, nucleoid (bulk chromosome) dynamics, and cell division. Functional analyses, together with high‐dimensional classification, unveil new associations of morphological and cell cycle phenotypes with specific functions and pathways. Additionally, correlation analysis across ~4,000 genetic perturbations shows that growth rate is surprisingly not predictive of cell size. Growth rate was also uncorrelated with the relative timings of nucleoid separation and cell constriction. Rather, our analysis identifies scaling relationships between cell size and nucleoid size and between nucleoid size and the relative timings of nucleoid separation and cell division. These connections suggest that the nucleoid links cell morphogenesis to the cell cycle.     

The plant cell cycle

The first aim of this paper is to review recent progress in identifying genes in plants homologous to cell division cycle (cdc) genes of fission yeast. In the latter, cdc genes are well-characterised. Arguably, most is known about cdc2 which encodes a 34 kDa protein kinase (p34^cdc2) that functions at the G2-M and G1-S transition points of the cell cycle. At G2-M, the p34^cdc2 protein kinase is regulated by a number of gene products that function in independent regulatory pathways. The cdc2 kinase is switched on by a phosphatase encoded by cdc25, and switched off by a protein kinase encoded by weel. p34 Must also bind with a cyclin protein to form maturation promoting factor before exhibiting protein kinase activity. In plants, homologues to p34^cdc2 have been identified in pea, wheat, Arabidopsis, alfalfa, maize and Chlamydomonas. They all exhibit the PSTAIRE motif, an absolutely conserved amino acid sequence in all functional homologues sequenced so far. As in animals, some plant species contain more than one cdc2 protein kinase gene. but in contrast to animals where one functions at G2-M and the other (CDK2 in humans and Egl in Xenopus) at G1-S, it is still unclear whether there are functional differences between the plant p34^cdc2 protein kinases. Again, whereas in animals cyclins are well characterised on the basis of sequence analysis, into class A, class B (G2-M) and CLN (G1 cyclins), cyclins isolated from several plant species cannot be so clearly characterised. The differences between plant and animal homologues to p34^cdc2 and cyclins raises the possibility that some of the regulatory controls of the plant genes may be different from those of their animal counterparts. The second aim of the paper is to review how planes of cell division and cell size are regulated at the molecular level. We focus on reports showing that p34^cdc2 binds to the preprophase band (ppb) in late G2 of the cell cycle. The binding of p34^cdc2 to ppbs may be important in regulating changes in directional growth but, more importantly, there is a requirement to understand what controls the positioning of ppbs. Thus, we highlight work resolving proteins such as the microtubule associated proteins (MAPs) and those mitogen activated protein kinases (MAP kinases), which act on, or bind to, mitotic microtubules. Plant homologues to MAP kinases have been identified in alfalfa. Finally, some consideration is given to cell size at division and how alterations in cell size can alter plant development. Transgenic tobacco plants expressing the fission yeast gene, cdc25, exhibited various perturbations of development and a reduced cell size at division. Hence, cdc25 affected the cell cycle (and as a consequence, cell size at division) and cdc25 expression was correlated with various alterations to development including precocious flowering and altered floral morphogenesis. Our view is that the cell cycle is a growth cycle in which a cell achieves an optimal size for division and that this size control has an important bearing on differentiation and development. Understanding how cell size is controlled, and how plant cdc genes are regulated, will be essential keys to ‘the cell cycle locks’, which when ‘opened’, will provide further clues about how the cell cycle is linked to plant development.     

Translational control of lipogenic enzymes in the cell cycle of synchronous,growing yeast cells

Translational control during cell division determines when cells start a new cell cycle, how fast they complete it, the number of successive divisions, and how cells coordinate proliferation with available nutrients. The translational efficiencies of mRNAs in cells progressing synchronously through the mitotic cell cycle, while preserving the coupling of cell division with cell growth, remain uninvestigated. We now report comprehensive ribosome profiling of a yeast cell size series from the time of cell birth, to identify mRNAs under periodic translational control. The data reveal coordinate translational activation of mRNAs encoding lipogenic enzymes late in the cell cycle including Acc1p, the rate‐limiting enzyme acetyl‐CoA carboxylase. An upstream open reading frame (uORF) confers the translational control of ACC1 and adjusts Acc1p protein levels in different nutrients. The ACC1 uORF is relevant for cell division because its ablation delays cell cycle progression, reduces cell size, and suppresses the replicative longevity of cells lacking the Sch9p protein kinase regulator of ribosome biogenesis. These findings establish an unexpected relationship between lipogenesis and protein synthesis in mitotic cell divisions.     

Loss of growth homeostasis by genetic decoupling of cell division from biomass growth: implication for size control mechanisms

Growing cells adjust their division time with biomass accumulation to maintain growth homeostasis. Size control mechanisms, such as the size checkpoint, provide an inherent coupling of growth and division by gating certain cell cycle transitions based on cell size. We describe genetic manipulations that decouple cell division from cell size, leading to the loss of growth homeostasis, with cells becoming progressively smaller or progressively larger until arresting. This was achieved by modulating glucose influx independently of external glucose. Division rate followed glucose influx, while volume growth was largely defined by external glucose. Therefore, the coordination of size and division observed in wild‐type cells reflects tuning of two parallel processes, which is only refined by an inherent feedback‐dependent coupling. We present a class of size control models explaining the observed breakdowns of growth homeostasis.     

Different functions of HOPS isoforms in the cell

Hepatocyte odd protein shuttling (HOPS) moves between nucleus and cytoplasm. HOPS overexpression leads to cell cycle arrest in G₀/G₁, and HOPS knockdown causes centrosome alterations, with subsequent abnormal cell division. Recently, we demonstrated that HOPS acts as a functional bridge in NPM-p19^Arf interactions. Here we show that HOPS is present in 3 different isoforms that play distinct intracellular functions. Although HOPS is a transmembrane ubiquitin, an isoform with intermediate molecular weight is cleaved from the membrane and released into the cytosol, to act as the shuttling protein. We identified a signal peptide peptidase structure in N-terminal membrane-bound HOPS that allows the regulated intramembrane proteolysis (RIP) system to control the relative amounts of the released, shuttling isoform capable of binding NPM. These results argue for distinct, isoform-specific functions of HOPS in the nucleolus, nucleus, and cytoplasm and provide insight into the dynamics of HOPS association with NPM, whose mutation and subsequent delocalization is found in 30% of acute myeloid leukemia patients.     

Extracellular control of cell size

Both cell growth (cell mass increase) and progression through the cell division cycle are required for sustained cell proliferation. Proliferating cells in culture tend to double in mass before each division, but it is not known how growth and division rates are co-ordinated to ensure that cell size is maintained. The prevailing view is that coordination is achieved because cell growth is rate-limiting for cell-cycle progression. Here, we challenge this view. We have investigated the relationship between cell growth and cell-cycle progression in purified rat Schwann cells, using two extracellular signal proteins that are known to influence these cells. We find that glial growth factor (GGF) can stimulate cell-cycle progression without promoting cell growth. We have used this restricted action of GGF to show that, for cultured Schwann cells, cell growth rate alone does not determine the rate of cell-cycle progression and that cell size at division is variable and depends on the concentrations of extracellular signal proteins that stimulate cell-cycle progression, cell growth, or both.     

The correlation between cell and nucleus size is explained by an eukaryotic cell growth model

In eukaryotes, the cell volume is observed to be strongly correlated with the nuclear volume. The slope of this correlation depends on the cell type, growth condition, and the physical environment of the cell. We develop a computational model of cell growth and proteome increase, incorporating the kinetics of amino acid import, protein/ribosome synthesis and degradation, and active transport of proteins between the cytoplasm and the nucleoplasm. We also include a simple model of ribosome biogenesis and assembly. Results show that the cell volume is tightly correlated with the nuclear volume, and the cytoplasm-nucleoplasm transport rates strongly influence the cell growth rate as well as the cell/nucleus volume ratio (C/N ratio). Ribosome assembly and the ratio of ribosomal proteins to mature ribosomes also influence the cell volume and the cell growth rate. We find that in order to regulate the cell growth rate and the cell/nucleus volume ratio, the cell must optimally control groups of kinetic and transport parameters together, which could explain the quantitative roles of canonical growth pathways. Finally, although not explicitly demonstrated in this work, we point out that it is possible to construct a detailed proteome distribution using our model and RNAseq data, provided that a quantitative cell division mechanism is known.     

How much cytoplasm can a bacterial genome control?

In this perspective we discuss that bacterial genomes have optimized during evolution to control a range of cytoplasm, from immediately after cell division to a maximum amount/volume present just prior to DNA replication and subsequent cell division. The genetic expansion of bacteria via evolution may be limited to a genome size:cytoplasm amount/volume ratios and energetics that have been selected for during 3.6-4 billion years of evolution on the Earth. The optimal genome size is one that is relatively constant, but also has some plasticity for evolutionary change (via gene transfer) and mutational events, and can control a range of cytoplasm during the cell cycle.     

Microarrays and the relationship of mRNA variation to protein variation during the cell cycle

Microarray analyses have led to the postulated existence and identification of numerous genes that are believed to be expressed and presumably to act in a cell-cycle-specific manner because their expression varies during the cell cycle. It is important to see how protein variation can be produced from mRNA variation. We have calculated the protein content throughout the cell cycle resulting from cell-cycle-specific mRNA expression, and compared the result to protein content resulting from constant, cell-cycle independent, mRNA expression. For stable proteins, cell-cycle-specific mRNA expression leads to a maximum 2-fold change in protein content compared to proteins synthesized from constantly expressed mRNA. More realistic sinusoidal patterns of mRNA expression exhibit much smaller ratios of 1.25 or lower, even for extremely large amplitudes in mRNA expression. For unstable proteins that have a cycle-independent half-life, only at extremely short protein half-lives does mRNA variation have a significant impact on variation of protein content during the division cycle. We also apply these findings to proteins with a cycle-specific decay pattern. mRNA variations during the eukaryotic division cycle variation of mRNA during the cell cycle can have only a minimal affect on the variation of protein content during the cell cycle. We conclude that mRNA variations during the division cycle, as measured by microarrays, cannot by themselves, identify cycle-specific functions related to protein variations.     

Modelling cell population growth with applications to cancer therapy in human tumour cell lines

In this paper we present an overview of the work undertaken to model a population of cells and the effects of cancer therapy. We began with a theoretical one compartment size structured cell population model and investigated its asymptotic steady size distributions (SSDs) (On a cell growth model for plankton, MMB JIMA 21 (2004) 49). However these size distributions are not similar to the DNA (size) distributions obtained experimentally via the flow cytometric analysis of human tumour cell lines (data obtained from the Auckland Cancer Society Research Centre, New Zealand). In our one compartment model, size was a generic term, but in order to obtain realistic steady size distributions we chose size to be DNA content and devised a multi-compartment mathematical model for the cell division cycle where each compartment corresponds to a distinct phase of the cell cycle (J. Math. Biol. 47 (2003) 295). We then incorporated another compartment describing the possible induction of apoptosis (cell death) from mitosis phase (Modelling cell death in human tumour cell lines exposed to anticancer drug paclitaxel, J. Math. Biol. 2004, in press). This enabled us to compare our model to flow cytometric data of a melanoma cell line where the anticancer drug, paclitaxel, had been added. The model gives a dynamic picture of the effects of paclitaxel on the cell cycle. We hope to use the model to describe the effects of other cancer therapies on a number of different cell lines.     

A mitochondrial protein affects cell morphology, mitochondrial segregation and virulence in Leishmania

The single mitochondrion of kinetoplastids divides in synchrony with the nucleus and plays a crucial role in cell division. However, despite its importance and potential as a drug target, the mechanism of mitochondrial division and segregation and the molecules involved are only partly understood. In our quest to identify novel mitochondrial proteins in Leishmania, we constructed a hidden Markov model from the targeting motifs of known mitochondrial proteins as a tool to search the Leishmania major genome. We show here that one of the 17 proteins of unknown function that we identified, designated mitochondrial protein X (MIX), is an oligomeric protein probably located in the inner membrane and expressed throughout the Leishmania life cycle. The MIX gene appears to be essential. Moreover, even deletion of one allele from L. major led to abnormalities in cell morphology, mitochondrial segregation and, importantly, to loss of virulence. MIX is unique to kinetoplastids but its heterologous expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae produced defects in mitochondrial morphology. Our data show that a number of mitochondrial proteins are unique to kinetoplastids and some, like MIX, play a central role in mitochondrial segregation and cell division, as well as virulence.     

Cycling in a crowd: Coordination of plant cell division,growth, and cell fate

The reiterative organogenesis that drives plant growth relies on the constant production of new cells, which remain encased by interconnected cell walls. For these reasons, plant morphogenesis strictly depends on the rate and orientation of both cell division and cell growth. Important progress has been made in recent years in understanding how cell cycle progression and the orientation of cell divisions are coordinated with cell and organ growth and with the acquisition of specialized cell fates. We review basic concepts and players in plant cell cycle and division, and then focus on their links to growth-related cues, such as metabolic state, cell size, cell geometry, and cell mechanics, and on how cell cycle progression and cell division are linked to specific cell fates. The retinoblastoma pathway has emerged as a major player in the coordination of the cell cycle with both growth and cell identity, while microtubule dynamics are central in the coordination of oriented cell divisions. Future challenges include clarifying feedbacks between growth and cell cycle progression, revealing the molecular basis of cell division orientation in response to mechanical and chemical signals, and probing the links between cell fate changes and chromatin dynamics during the cell cycle.

Plant cell cycle and division are linked to specific cell fates and respond to growth-related cues, such as metabolic state, cell size, cell shape, and mechanical stress.     

Localization to the nucleolus is a common feature of coronavirus nucleoproteins, and the protein may disrupt host cell division

The subcellular localization of transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) and mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) (group I and group II coronaviruses, respectively) nucleoproteins (N proteins) were examined by confocal microscopy. The proteins were shown to localize either to the cytoplasm alone or to the cytoplasm and a structure in the nucleus. This feature was confirmed to be the nucleolus by using specific antibodies to nucleolin, a major component of the nucleolus, and by confocal microscopy to image sections through a cell expressing N protein. These findings are consistent with our previous report for infectious bronchitis virus (group III coronavirus) (J. A. Hiscox et al., J. Virol. 75:506-512, 2001), indicating that nucleolar localization of the N protein is a common feature of the coronavirus family and is possibly of functional significance. Nucleolar localization signals were identified in the domain III region of the N protein from all three coronavirus groups, and this suggested that transport of N protein to the nucleus might be an active process. In addition, our results suggest that the N protein might function to disrupt cell division. Thus, we observed that approximately 30% of cells transfected with the N protein appeared to be undergoing cell division. The most likely explanation for this is that the N protein induced a cell cycle delay or arrest, most likely in the G(2)/M phase. In a fraction of transfected cells expressing coronavirus N proteins, we observed multinucleate cells and dividing cells with nucleoli (which are only present during interphase). These findings are consistent with the possible inhibition of cytokinesis in these cells.