Crystal structure of β-barrel assembly machinery BamCD protein complex

The β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) complex of Escherichia coli is a multiprotein machine that catalyzes the essential process of assembling outer membrane proteins. The BAM complex consists of five proteins: one membrane protein, BamA, and four lipoproteins, BamB, BamC, BamD, and BamE. Here, we report the first crystal structure of a Bam lipoprotein complex: the essential lipoprotein BamD in complex with the N-terminal half of BamC (BamC(UN) (Asp(28)-Ala(217)), a 73-residue-long unstructured region followed by the N-terminal domain). The BamCD complex is stabilized predominantly by various hydrogen bonds and salt bridges formed between BamD and the N-terminal unstructured region of BamC. Sequence and molecular surface analyses revealed that many of the conserved residues in both proteins are found at the BamC-BamD interface. A series of truncation mutagenesis and analytical gel filtration chromatography experiments confirmed that the unstructured region of BamC is essential for stabilizing the BamCD complex structure. The unstructured N terminus of BamC interacts with the proposed substrate-binding pocket of BamD, suggesting that this region of BamC may play a regulatory role in outer membrane protein biogenesis.     

Dynamic Association of BAM Complex Modules Includes Surface Exposure of the Lipoprotein BamC

The β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) complex drives the assembly of β-barrel proteins into the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria. It is composed of five subunits: BamA, BamB, BamC, BamD, and BamE. We find that the BAM complex isolated from the outer membrane of Escherichia coli consists of a core complex of BamA:B:C:D:E and, in addition, a BamA:B module and a BamC:D module. In the absence of BamC, these modules are destabilized, resulting in increased protease susceptibility of BamD and BamB. While the N-terminus of BamC carries a highly conserved region crucial for stable interaction with BamD, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, and protease-sensitivity assays show that the C-terminal domain of BamC, composed of two helix-grip motifs, is exposed on the surface of E. coli. This unexpected topology of a bacterial lipoprotein is reminiscent of the analogous protein subunits from the mitochondrial β-barrel insertion machinery, the SAM complex. The modular arrangement and topological features provide new insight into the architecture of the BAM complex, towards a better understanding of the mechanism driving β-barrel membrane protein assembly.     

Substrate-dependent arrangements of the subunits of the BAM complex determined by neutron reflectometry

In Gram-negative bacteria, the β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) complex catalyses the assembly of β-barrel proteins into the outer membrane, and is composed of five subunits: BamA, BamB, BamC, BamD and BamE. Once assembled, - β-barrel proteins can be involved in various functions including uptake of nutrients, export of toxins and mediating host-pathogen interactions, but the precise mechanism by which these ubiquitous and often essential β-barrel proteins are assembled is yet to be established. In order to determine the relative positions of BAM subunits in the membrane environment we reconstituted each subunit into a biomimetic membrane, characterizing their interaction and structural changes by Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation monitoring (QCM-D) and neutron reflectometry. Our results suggested that the binding of BamE, or a BamDE dimer, to BamA induced conformational changes in the polypeptide transported-associated (POTRA) domains of BamA, but that BamB or BamD alone did not promote any such changes. As monitored by neutron reflectometry, addition of an unfolded substrate protein extended the length of POTRA domains further away from the membrane interface as part of the mechanism whereby the substrate protein was folded into the membrane.     

Crystal structure of Escherichia coli BamB, a lipoprotein component of the β-barrel assembly machinery complex

In Gram-negative bacteria, the BAM (β-barrel assembly machinery) complex catalyzes the essential process of assembling outer membrane proteins. The BAM complex in Escherichia coli consists of five proteins: one β-barrel membrane protein, BamA, and four lipoproteins, BamB, BamC, BamD, and BamE. Despite their role in outer membrane protein biogenesis, there is currently a lack of functional and structural information on the lipoprotein components of the BAM complex. Here, we report the first crystal structure of BamB, the largest and most functionally characterized lipoprotein component of the BAM complex. The crystal structure shows that BamB has an eight-bladed β-propeller structure, with four β-strands making up each blade. Mapping onto the structure the residues previously shown to be important for BamA interaction reveals that these residues, despite being far apart in the amino acid sequence, are localized to form a continuous solvent-exposed surface on one side of the β-propeller. Found on the same side of the β-propeller is a cluster of residues conserved among BamB homologs. Interestingly, our structural comparison study suggests that other proteins with a BamB-like fold often participate in protein or ligand binding, and that the binding interface on these proteins is located on the surface that is topologically equivalent to where the conserved residues and the residues that are important for BamA interaction are found on BamB. Our structural and bioinformatic analyses, together with previous biochemical data, provide clues to where the BamA and possibly a substrate interaction interface may be located on BamB.     

Crystal structure of BamD: an essential component of the β-Barrel assembly machinery of gram-negative bacteria

Folding and insertion of integral β-barrel proteins in the outer membrane (OM) is an essential process for Gram-negative bacteria that requires the β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM). Efficient OM protein (OMP) folding and insertion appears to require a consensus C-terminal signal in OMPs characterized by terminal F or W residues. The BAM complex is embedded in the OM and, in Escherichia coli, consists of the β-barrel BamA and four lipoproteins BamBCDE. BamA and BamD are broadly distributed across all species of Gram-negative bacteria, whereas the other components are present in only a subset of species. BamA and BamD are also essential for viability, suggesting that these two proteins constitute the functional core of the bacterial BAM complex. Here, we present the crystal structure of BamD from the thermophilic bacteria Rhodothermus marinus refined to 2.15 Å resolution. The protein contains five tetratricopeptide repeats (TPRs) organized into two offset tandems, each capped by a terminal helix. The N-terminal domain contains three TPRs and displays remarkable structural similarity with proteins that recognize targeting signals in extended conformations. The C-terminal domain harbors the remaining two TPRs and previously described mutations that impair binding to other BAM components map to this domain. Therefore, the structure suggests a model where the C-terminal domain provides a scaffold for interaction with BAM components, while the N-terminal domain participates in interaction with the substrates, either recognizing the C-terminal consensus sequence or binding unfolded OMP intermediates.     

Augmenting β-augmentation: structural basis of how BamB binds BamA and may support folding of outer membrane proteins

β-Barrel proteins are frequently found in the outer membrane of mitochondria, chloroplasts and Gram-negative bacteria. In Escherichia coli, these proteins are inserted in the outer membrane by the Bam (β-barrel assembly machinery) complex, a multiprotein machinery formed by the β-barrel protein BamA and the four peripheral membrane proteins BamB, BamC, BamD and BamE. The periplasmic part of BamA binds prefolded β-barrel proteins by a β-augmentation mechanism, thereby stabilizing the precursors prior to their membrane insertion. However, the role of the associated proteins within the Bam complex remains unknown. Here, we describe the crystal structure of BamB, a nonessential component of the Bam complex. The structure shows a typical eight-bladed β-propeller fold. Two sequence stretches of BamB were previously identified to be important for interaction with BamA. In our structure, both motifs are located in close proximity to each other and contribute to a conserved region forming a narrow groove on the top of the propeller. Moreover, crystal contacts reveal two interaction modes of how BamB might bind unfolded β-barrel proteins. In the crystal lattice, BamB binds to exposed β-strands by β-augmentation, whereas peptide stretches rich in aromatic residues can be accommodated in hydrophobic pockets located at the bottom of the propeller. Thus, BamB could simultaneously bind to BamA and prefolded β-barrel proteins, thereby enhancing the folding and membrane insertion capability of the Bam complex.     

Crystal Structure of BamB Bound to a Periplasmic Domain Fragment of BamA,the Central Component of the β-Barrel Assembly Machine

The β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) mediates folding and insertion of β-barrel outer membrane proteins (OMPs) into the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. BAM is a five-protein complex consisting of the β-barrel OMP BamA and lipoproteins BamB, -C, -D, and -E. High resolution structures of all the individual BAM subunits and a BamD-BamC complex have been determined. However, the overall complex architecture remains elusive. BamA is the central component of BAM and consists of a membrane-embedded β-barrel and a periplasmic domain with five polypeptide translocation-associated (POTRA) motifs thought to interact with the accessory lipoproteins. Here we report the crystal structure of a fusion between BamB and a POTRA3–5 fragment of BamA. Extended loops 13 and 17 protruding from one end of the BamB β-propeller contact the face of the POTRA3 β-sheet in BamA. The interface is stabilized by several hydrophobic contacts, a network of hydrogen bonds, and a cation-π interaction between BamA Tyr-255 and BamB Arg-195. Disruption of BamA-BamB binding by BamA Y255A and probing of the interface by disulfide bond cross-linking validate the physiological relevance of the observed interface. Furthermore, the structure is consistent with previously published mutagenesis studies. The periplasmic five-POTRA domain of BamA is flexible in solution due to hinge motions in the POTRA2–3 linker. Modeling BamB in complex with full-length BamA shows BamB binding at the POTRA2–3 hinge, suggesting a role in modulation of BamA flexibility and the conformational changes associated with OMP folding and insertion.     

A Modular BAM Complex in the Outer Membrane of the α-Proteobacterium Caulobacter crescentus

Mitochondria are organelles derived from an intracellular α-proteobacterium. The biogenesis of mitochondria relies on the assembly of β-barrel proteins into the mitochondrial outer membrane, a process inherited from the bacterial ancestor. Caulobacter crescentus is an α-proteobacterium, and the BAM (β-barrel assembly machinery) complex was purified and characterized from this model organism. Like the mitochondrial sorting and assembly machinery complex, we find the BAM complex to be modular in nature. A ∼150 kDa core BAM complex containing BamA, BamB, BamD, and BamE associates with additional modules in the outer membrane. One of these modules, Pal, is a lipoprotein that provides a means for anchorage to the peptidoglycan layer of the cell wall. We suggest the modular design of the BAM complex facilitates access to substrates from the protein translocase in the inner membrane.     

The evolution of new lipoprotein subunits of the bacterial outer membrane BAM complex

The β-barrel assembly machine (BAM) complex is an essential feature of all bacteria with an outer membrane. The core subunit of the BAM complex is BamA and, in Escherichia coli, four lipoprotein subunits: BamB, BamC, BamD and BamE, also function in the BAM complex. Hidden Markov model analysis was used to comprehensively assess the distribution of subunits of the BAM lipoproteins across all subclasses of proteobacteria. A patchwork distribution was detected which is readily reconciled with the evolution of the α-, β-, γ-, δ- and ε-proteobacteria. Our findings lead to a proposal that the ancestral BAM complex was composed of two subunits: BamA and BamD, and that BamB, BamC and BamE evolved later in a distinct sequence of events. Furthermore, in some lineages novel lipoproteins have evolved instead of the lipoproteins found in E. coli. As an example of this concept, we show that no known species of α-proteobacteria has a homologue of BamC. However, purification of the BAM complex from the model α-proteobacterium Caulobacter crescentus identified a novel subunit we refer to as BamF, which has a conserved sequence motif related to sequences found in BamC. BamF and BamD can be eluted from the BAM complex under similar conditions, mirroring the BamC:D module seen in the BAM complex of γ-proteobacteria such as E. coli.     

Structural Basis for the Function of the β-Barrel Assembly-Enhancing Protease BepA

The β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) complex mediates the assembly of β-barrel membrane proteins in the outer membrane. BepA, formerly known as YfgC, interacts with the BAM complex and functions as a protease/chaperone for the enhancement of the assembly and/or degradation of β-barrel membrane proteins. To elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying the dual functions of BepA, its full-length three-dimensional structure is needed. Here, we report the crystal structure of full-length BepA at 2.6-Å resolution. BepA possesses an N-terminal protease domain and a C-terminal tetratricopeptide repeat domain, which interact with each other. Domain cross-linking by structure-guided introduction of disulfide bonds did not affect the activities of BepA in vivo, suggesting that the function of this protein does not involve domain rearrangement. The full-length BepA structure is compatible with the previously proposed docking model of BAM complex and tetratricopeptide repeat domain of BepA.     

The essential β-barrel assembly machinery complex components BamD and BamA are required for autotransporter biogenesis

Autotransporter biogenesis is dependent upon BamA, a central component of the β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) complex. In this report, we detail the role of the other BAM components (BamB-E). We identify the importance of BamD in autotransporter biogenesis and show that BamB, BamC, and BamE are not required.     

The crystal structure of BamB suggests interactions with BamA and its role within the BAM complex

Escherichia coli BamB is the largest of four lipoproteins in the β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) complex. It interacts with the periplasmic domain of BamA, an integral outer membrane protein (OMP) essential for OMP biogenesis. Although BamB is not essential, it serves an important function in the BAM complex, significantly increasing the folding efficiency of some OMPs in vivo and in vitro. To learn more about the BAM complex, we solved structures of BamB in three different crystal forms. BamB crystallized in space groups P2₁3, I222, and P2₁2₁2₁, with one molecule per asymmetric unit in each case. Crystals from the space group I222 diffracted to 1. 65-Å resolution. BamB forms an eight-bladed β-propeller with a central pore and is shaped like a doughnut. A DALI search revealed that BamB shares structural homology to several eukaryotic proteins containing WD40 repeat domains, which commonly have β-propeller folds and often serve as scaffolding proteins within larger multi-protein complexes that carry out signal transduction, cell division, and chemotaxis. Using mutagenesis data from previous studies, we docked BamB onto a BamA structural model and assessed known and possible interactions between these two proteins. Our data suggest that BamB serves as a scaffolding protein within the BAM complex by optimally orienting the flexible periplasmic domain of BamA for interaction with other BAM components and chaperones. This may facilitate integration of newly synthesized OMPs into the outer membrane.     

BamE structure: the assembly of β-barrel proteins in the outer membranes of bacteria and mitochondria

A study recently published in EMBO reports solves the solution structure of E. coli BamE, thus providing the basis for a better understanding of the mechanism of β-barrel assembly in bacterial and mitochondrial outer membranes.EMBO Rep (2011) advance online publication. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.202β-barrel membrane proteins are found exclusively in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria and the outer membranes of eukaryotic organelles of prokaryotic origin, mitochondria and chloroplasts. In contrast to the inner membrane, the bacterial outer membrane is an asymmetrical bilayer that consists mainly of lipopolysaccharides in the outer leaflet and phospholipids in the inner leaflet. Bacterial β-barrel outer membrane proteins (OMPs) mediate many cellular functions, for example, passive or selective diffusion of small molecules through the β-barrel pores across the outer membrane. By contrast, only a few mitochondrial β-barrel outer membrane proteins (MBOMPs) have been identified so far. The central machineries that mediate insertion and assembly of OMPs/MBOMPs are the β-barrel assembly machine (BAM) complex in the bacterial outer membrane and the topogenesis of outer-membrane β-barrel proteins (TOB)/sorting and assembly machinery (SAM) complex in the mitochondrial outer membrane (Knowles et al, 2009; Endo & Yamano, 2010; Stroud et al, 2010; Fig 1). However, the molecular mechanisms of β-barrel protein topogenesis in bacterial and mitochondrial outer membranes remain poorly understood.Open in a separate windowFigure 1β-barrel protein assembly in bacterial and mitochondrial outer membranes. (A) Bacteria. Ribbon models of the structures of the Sec complex, SurA, BamA (Clantin et al, 2007; Kim et al, 2007), BamE and OMP. The upper and lower inserts show the surface of BamE (residues 20–108; viewed after approximately 90° rotation of the ribbon model around the horizontal axis toward the reader). Residues important for BamD binding are shown in red and residues with NMR signals that were perturbed by BamD binding are shown in yellow. The residue (Phe 74) important for PG binding is shown in red and the residues with NMR signals that were perturbed by PG binding are shown in yellow. (B) Mitochondria. Ribbon models were drawn for the structures of small Tim and MBOMP. IM, inner membrane; IMS, intermembrane space; MBOMP, mitochondrial β-barrel outer membrane protein; OM, outer membrane; OMP, outer membrane protein; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; POTRA, polypeptide transport-associated domain.Bacterial OMPs are synthesized in the cytosol as precursor proteins with an amino-terminal signal sequence that guides the proteins to the Sec machinery for crossing the inner membrane and is cleaved off in the periplasm. Periplasmic chaperones then escort OMPs through the aqueous periplasmic space in a partly unfolded state. On reaching the outer membrane, OMPs assemble into a β-barrel structure and insert into the outer membrane with the help of the BAM complex. The bacterial OMP insertion pathway can be compared to the assembly pathway of MBOMPs from the mitochondrial intermembrane space into the outer membrane. MBOMPs are synthesized in the cytosol and imported into the intermembrane space by the outer membrane translocator TOM40. The subsequent chaperone-mediated escort across the intermembrane space and insertion into the outer membrane by the TOB complex is similar to the OMP assembly process. Notably, the BAM and TOB complexes share the homologous β-barrel proteins BamA and Tob55/Sam50, respectively, as the central components of their insertion machineries. The BAM complex in Escherichia coli consists of BamA (YaeT/Omp85) and four accessory lipoproteins: BamB (YfgL), BamC (NlpB), BamD (YfiO) and BamE (SmpA). BamA and BamD are essential for cell growth, yet deletion of dispensable BamB, BamC or BamE leads to outer membrane defects manifested in hypersensitivity to antibiotics. Although BamAB and BamCDE can form distinct subcomplexes, they become functional only after formation of the entire BAM complex with all five subunits (Hagan et al, 2010).In this issue of EMBO reports, Knowles et al (2011) solve the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) solution structure of E. coli BamE, which sheds light on the roles of one of the Bam subunits in β-barrel protein assembly. The structure of BamE consists of a three-stranded antiparallel β-sheet packed against a pair of α-helices (Fig 1).As the ΔbamE mutant cannot grow in the presence of vancomycin, the authors identify functionally important residues of BamE by testing the effects of amino-acid substitutions in BamE on its inability to complement the growth defects of ΔbamE, without destabilizing BamE itself. Many of the identified residues are conserved among BamE proteins from different organisms and map to a single surface area on BamE. Interestingly, NMR signals of the residues around this region are sensitive to the addition of micelles containing the lipid phosphatidylglycerol, but not phosphatidylethanolamine or cardiolipin. In parallel, the authors analyse perturbation of the NMR spectra of BamE after the addition of purified BamB, C and D proteins. Only BamD affects the NMR spectra of BamE, and the BamD interacting region of BamE is found to overlap partly with the residues involved in phosphatidylglycerol binding. As the addition of BamD and phosphatidylglycerol have different effects on the NMR spectra of BamE, the binding of BamD and phosphatidylglycerol to BamE seem to take place simultaneously. What is the biological relevance of the observed interactions of BamE with both BamD and phosphatidylglycerol? As phosphatidylglycerol was found to help the insertion of OMPs into lipid liposomes (Patel et al, 2009), BamE might recruit the BAM complex through BamD to phosphatidylglycerol-rich regions in the outer membrane, or might directly recruit phosphatidylglycerol to form assembly points for OMP insertion and folding.What are the roles of other subunits of the BAM complex in β-barrel protein assembly? The essential subunit of the E. coli BAM complex BamA consists of two domains: the N-terminal polypeptide transport-associated (POTRA) domain repeat in the periplasm and the carboxy-terminal β-barrel domain, embedded in the outer membrane. The number of POTRA domains ranges from one to five in BamA homologues from different organisms. Of these POTRA domains, the one nearest to the C-terminal that is most connected to the β-barrel domain is essential for cell viability and its deletion leads to disassembly of the BAM complex (Kim et al, 2007). Structural studies of the E. coli BamA POTRA domains suggest that each POTRA domain has a common fold, whereas conformational rigidity might differ between inter-domain linkers (Gatzeva-Topalova et al, 2010; Fig 1). As individual POTRA domains have some affinity for unfolded substrate proteins, the periplasmic tandem POTRA repeat probably provides several substrate binding sites that slide the substrate progressively towards the BamA β-barrel domain. The β-barrel domain of BamA probably functions as a scaffold to facilitate the formation of β-strands, possibly through β-augmentation and subsequent spontaneous membrane insertion of the β-barrel. Yet, it is not clear whether this cradle for β-strand formation is provided by the pore formed within the monomer or oligomeric forms of the BamA β-barrel domain. Alternatively, membrane insertion and folding of OMPs might take place at the interface between BamA and the outer membrane lipid bilayer.How much of the β-barrel assembly process is conserved during the evolution of mitochondria from Gram-negative bacteria? Although the central subunits BamA and Tob55 of the BAM and TOB complexes are conserved, other subunits of these complexes are unrelated to each other. The POTRA domains of BamA are essential for recognition and assembly of bacterial OMPs, whereas that of Tob55 is dispensable for MBOMP assembly in the mitochondrial outer membrane. Nevertheless, the mitochondrial TOB complex facilitates assembly of bacterial OMPs at low efficiency (Walther et al, 2009) and, in turn, the bacterial BAM complex can mediate assembly of mitochondrial porin. Therefore, the basic mechanism of β-barrel assembly in the outer membranes of bacteria and mitochondria seems to be conserved. High-resolution structures of each component of the BAM and TOB complexes—including that of BamE in this study—will thus provide the basis for a better understanding of the mechanism of β-barrel assembly in evolutionarily related bacterial and mitochondrial outer membranes.     

Substitutions in the BamA β-barrel domain overcome the conditional lethal phenotype of a ΔbamB ΔbamE strain of Escherichia coli

BamA interacts with the BamBCDE lipoproteins, and together they constitute the essential β-barrel assembly machine (BAM) of Escherichia coli. The simultaneous absence of BamB and BamE confers a conditional lethal phenotype and a severe β-barrel outer membrane protein (OMP) biogenesis defect. Without BamB and BamE, wild-type BamA levels are significantly reduced, and the folding of the BamA β-barrel, as assessed by the heat-modifiability assay, is drastically compromised. Single-amino-acid substitutions in the β-barrel domain of BamA improve both bacterial growth and OMP biogenesis in a bamB bamE mutant and restore BamA levels close to the BamB(+) BamE(+) level. The substitutions alter BamA β-barrel folding, and folding in the mutants becomes independent of BamB and BamE. Remarkably, BamA β-barrel alterations also improve OMP biogenesis in cells lacking the major periplasmic chaperone, SurA, which, together with BamB, is thought to facilitate the transfer of partially folded OMPs to the soluble POTRA (polypeptide-transport-associated) domain of BamA. Unlike the bamB bamE mutant background, the absence of BamB or SurA does not affect BamA β-barrel folding. Thus, substitutions in the outer membrane-embedded BamA β-barrel domain overcome OMP biogenesis defects that occur at the POTRA domain of BamA in the periplasm. Based on the structure of FhaC, the altered BamA residues are predicted to lie on a highly conserved loop that folds inside the β-barrel and in regions pointing outside the β-barrel, suggesting that they influence BamA function by both direct and indirect mechanisms.     

Neisserial Omp85 protein is selectively recognized and assembled into functional complexes in the outer membrane of human mitochondria

As a consequence of their bacterial origin, mitochondria contain β-barrel proteins in their outer membrane (OMM). These proteins require the translocase of the outer membrane (TOM) complex and the conserved sorting and assembly machinery (SAM) complex for transport and integration into the OMM. The SAM complex and the β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) required for biogenesis of β-barrel proteins in bacteria are evolutionarily related. Despite this homology, we show that bacterial β-barrel proteins are not universally recognized and integrated into the OMM of human mitochondria. Selectivity exists both at the level of the TOM and the SAM complex. Of all of the proteins we tested, human mitochondria imported only β-barrel proteins originating from Neisseria sp., and only Omp85, the central component of the neisserial BAM complex, integrated into the OMM. PorB proteins from different Neisseria, although imported by the TOM, were not recognized by the SAM complex and formed membrane complexes only when functional Omp85 was present at the same time in mitochondria. Omp85 alone was capable of integrating other bacterial β-barrel proteins in human mitochondria, but could not substitute for the function of its mitochondrial homolog Sam50. Thus, signals and machineries for transport and assembly of β-barrel proteins in bacteria and human mitochondria differ enough to allow only a certain type of β-barrel proteins to be targeted and integrated in mitochondrial membranes in human cells.     

Assembly of β-barrel proteins into bacterial outer membranes

Membrane proteins with a β-barrel topology are found in the outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria and in the plastids and mitochondria of eukaryotic cells. The assembly of these membrane proteins depends on a protein folding reaction (to create the barrel) and an insertion reaction (to integrate the barrel within the outer membrane). Experimental approaches using biophysics and biochemistry are detailing the steps in the assembly pathway, while genetics and bioinformatics have revealed a sophisticated production line of cellular components that catalyze the assembly pathway in vivo. This includes the modular BAM complex, several molecular chaperones and the translocation and assembly module (the TAM). Recent screens also suggest that further components of the pathway might remain to be discovered. We review what is known about the process of β-barrel protein assembly into membranes, and the components of the β-barrel assembly machinery. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Protein trafficking and secretion in bacteria. Guest Editors: Anastassios Economou and Ross Dalbey.     

Crystal Structure of BamB from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Functional Evaluation of Its Conserved Structural Features

The assembly of β-barrel Outer Membrane Proteins (OMPs) in the outer membrane is essential for Gram-negative bacteria. The process requires the β-Barrel Assembly Machine (BAM), a multiprotein complex that, in E. coli, is composed of the OMP BamA and four lipoproteins BamB-E. Whereas BamA and BamD are essential, deletion of BamB, C or E produce membrane permeability defects. Here we present the high-resolution structure of BamB from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This protein can complement the deletion of bamB in E. coli indicating that they are functionally equivalent. Conserved structural features include an eight-bladed β-propeller fold stabilized by tryptophan docking motifs with a central pore about 8 Å in diameter at the narrowest point. This pore distinguishes BamB from related β-propellers, such as quinoprotein dehydrogenases. However, a double mutation designed to block this pore was fully functional indicating that the opening is not essential. Two loops protruding from the bottom of the propeller are conserved and mediate binding to BamA. Conversely, an additional loop only present in E. coli BamB is not required for function. A cluster of highly conserved residues in a groove between blades 6 and 7 is crucial for proper BamB folding or biogenesis. It has been proposed that BamB may bind nascent OMPs by β-augmentation to its propeller outer strands, or recognize the aromatic residue signature at the C-terminus of OMPs. However, Isothermal Titration Calorimetry experiments and structural analysis do not support these proposals. The structural and mutagenesis analysis suggests that the main function of BamB is to bind and modulate BamA, rather than directly interact with nascent OMPs.     

BamE modulates the Escherichia coli beta-barrel assembly machine component BamA

Biogenesis of the outer membrane (OM) is an essential process in gram-negative bacteria. One of the key steps of OM biogenesis is the assembly of integral outer membrane beta-barrel proteins (OMPs) by a protein machine called the Bam complex. In Escherichia coli, the Bam complex is composed of the essential proteins BamA and BamD and three nonessential lipoproteins, BamB, BamC, and BamE. Both BamC and BamE are important for stabilizing the interaction between BamA and BamD. We used comprehensive genetic analysis to clarify the interplay between BamA and the BamCDE subcomplex. Combining a ΔbamE allele with mutations in genes that encode other OMP assembly factors leads to severe synthetic phenotypes, suggesting a critical function for BamE. These synthetic phenotypes are not nearly as severe in a ΔbamC background, suggesting that the functions of BamC and BamE are not completely overlapping. This unique function of BamE is related to the conformational state of BamA. In wild-type cells, BamA is sensitive to externally added proteinase K. Strikingly, when ΔbamE mutant cells are treated with proteinase K, BamA is degraded beyond detection. Taken together, our findings suggest that BamE modulates the conformation of BamA, likely through its interactions with BamD.     

The bacterial outer membrane β-barrel assembly machinery

β-Barrel proteins found in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria serve a variety of cellular functions. Proper folding and assembly of these proteins are essential for the viability of bacteria and can also play an important role in virulence. The β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) complex, which is responsible for the proper assembly of β-barrels into the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, has been the focus of many recent studies. This review summarizes the significant progress that has been made toward understanding the structure and function of the bacterial BAM complex.     

The fimbrial usher FimD follows the SurA-BamB pathway for its assembly in the outer membrane of Escherichia coli

Fimbrial ushers are the largest β-barrel outer membrane proteins (OMPs) known to date, which function in the polymerization of fimbriae and their translocation to the bacterial surface. Folding and assembly of these complex OMPs are not characterized. Here, we investigate the role of periplasmic chaperones (SurA, Skp, DegP, and FkpA) and individual components of the β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) complex (BamA, BamB, BamC, and BamE) in the folding of the Escherichia coli FimD usher. The FimD level is dramatically reduced (～30-fold) in a surA null mutant, but a strong cell envelope stress is constitutively activated with upregulation of DegP (～10-fold). To demonstrate a direct role of SurA, FimD folding was analyzed in a conditional surA mutant in which SurA expression was controlled. In this strain, FimD is depleted from bacteria in parallel to SurA without significant upregulation of DegP. Interestingly, the dependency on SurA is higher for FimD than for other OMPs. We also demonstrate that a functional BAM complex is needed for folding of FimD. In addition, FimD levels were strongly reduced (～5-fold) in a mutant lacking the accessory lipoprotein BamB. The critical role of BamB for FimD folding was confirmed by complementation and BamB depletion experiments. Similar to SurA dependency, FimD showed a stronger dependency on BamB than OMPs. On the other hand, folding of FimD was only marginally affected in bamC and bamE mutants. Collectively, our results indicate that FimD usher follows the SurA-BamB pathway for its assembly. The preferential use of this pathway for the folding of OMPs with large β-barrels is discussed.