Involving consumers in the development of an educational program for cystic fibrosis carrier screening.

Input from consumers of health care was sought in developing an educational program to be provided to individuals who are considering carrier testing for cystic fibrosis (CF). In addition, we assessed the ability of health professionals to predict consumers' priorities with regard to such information. A focus group of six middle school teachers formulated questions that they would ask in trying to decide whether they wanted carrier screening for CF. Then, other adults with (n = 39) and without (n = 60) a family history of CF were presented with the questions and were asked to select the questions in the order in which they would want them answered if offered the carrier test. After each question was answered, they were asked whether they would want the carrier test if it were offered to them. CF clinic staff, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors (n = 31) were asked to select the questions in the order in which they believed that an adult from the general population would want them answered. There were no differences in the order in which adults with and without a family history of CF would want questions answered. Consumers would want to learn about the carrier test as well as their risk of being a carrier and of having a child with CF, before receiving information on reproductive options and the effect that a child with CF would have on the family. Of the 44% of consumers who changed their mind about wanting screening during the course of selecting questions, 52% did so after the first question that they selected.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Offering cystic fibrosis carrier screening to an HMO population: factors associated with utilization.

We offered cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier testing to reproductive-age enrollees in an HMO, in order to determine factors associated with test utilization in a primarily nonpregnant population. Male and female enrollees either were mailed an invitation to have the test after attending an educational session (N = 2,713) or were approached in waiting rooms at the HMO sites and given the opportunity to have the test without making an additional visit (N = 608). Uptake was considerably higher when testing could be obtained without making an additional visit (23.5%) than when attendance at an educational session was required as a prerequisite for having the test (3.7%). Utilization was higher among respondents who were planning children. Caucasians, and those with higher educational attainment. Among respondents planning to have children, individuals with higher tolerance for test uncertainty, lower fear of stigma, and higher perceived risk of being a carrier were significantly more likely to have the test. Testing decisions were not associated with the perceived burden of a child with CF or with the likelihood of aborting for CF. Although utilization of CF carrier testing is relatively low among nonpregnant individuals, uptake is significantly higher when testing can be obtained with minimal effort. Factors associated with the decision to be tested had more to do with implications of being a carrier per se than with the concerns of having a child with CF.     

Prenatal hemoglobinopathy screening. IV. Follow-up of women at risk for a child with a clinically significant hemoglobinopathy.

To determine the benefits and burdens of prenatal hemoglobinopathy carrier identification and genetic counseling and its impact on subsequent reproductive behavior, we recontacted women whom we had previously identified as at risk for having a child with a clinically significant hemoglobinopathy, regardless of whether they had accepted the offer of prenatal diagnosis. Of the 46 such women, 31 were available for interview. These 31 women had received offers of prenatal diagnosis in 47 pregnancies. Seventeen had been accepted, and 30 had been declined. The proportion of patients accepting the offer of prenatal diagnosis was higher for the index pregnancy (50%) than for subsequent pregnancies (22%). The mean interval between the initial counseling of the patient and the follow-up interview was 43 mo (standard error +/- 2.7 mo). Ninety-four percent of those interviewed recalled having received information from the screening program; 74% recalled the name of their condition; 90% knew that trait did not affect their health; 84% recalled the name of the condition for which their fetus had been at risk; and 77% could state at least one symptom of the disease. Of the 29 women asked whether they intended to use prenatal diagnosis in future pregnancies, 13 said yes and 16 said no. Of the 26 patients asked about satisfaction with their previous decision about prenatal diagnosis, all were satisfied with their decision. Eighteen said they would make the same decision in their next pregnancy, but seven patients said they would not, and one was undecided.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Preconception cystic fibrosis carrier couple screening: impact,understanding, and satisfaction

The impact, understanding of test-results, and satisfaction among participating couples in a preconception cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier screening project were assessed 6 months after testing. Questionnaire data were obtained from 17/18 identified carriers, 15 partners of carriers with negative test results, and 794 (73%) other participants. None of the carriers changed their reproductive plans because of their test results. Eight participants were worried about their results, including four carriers. Those who attended a general practitioner (GP) consultation for pretest education were less worried than those who attended an educational session. Seven carriers felt less healthy. Predictors of a correct understanding of test results (correct in 62% of participants) were: positive test results, high level of knowledge of CF, high level of education, attending an educational session, and previously heard of CF. All participants who reported that they were worried, all carriers, and 95% of the other participants said that they would make the same decision to be tested again. Although couples who were educated during a GP consultation were less worried, the results of the study suggest that understanding is more correct in couples attending an educational session. The results further suggest that since satisfaction with the screening was high, worries and feeling less healthy due to the test results are probably not a great burden.     

Teaching about cystic fibrosis carrier screening by using written and video information.

We performed two studies using only written and video materials to educate people about cystic fibrosis (CF) and carrier screening. Participants were randomized to receive written or video materials. All received a brief questionnaire. Subjects in group I (n = 238) were (1) individuals in steady relationships and their partners, (2) > or = 18 years old, and (3) not pregnant. Those who accepted free screening and were not demonstrable carriers were sent a letter explaining their results and another questionnaire. Subjects in group II (n = 108) were parents seeking well child care in a university clinic. The main outcome measures were ability to answer questions correctly about (1) health status of CF carriers and people with CF, (2) the possibility of false-negative results, and (3) for those who had screening, the implications of their own results. Written and video materials were equally effective in conveying information. Prior to screening, subjects answered an average of 86% of questions correctly. Subjects with less formal education answered fewer questions correctly; 60% of those with less than a high school education had adequate knowledge of the health consequences of having CF or being a carrier, compared with > or = 94% of college graduates. Performance improved after screening. Where neither partner was a demonstrable carrier, 88% knew their own and their partner's test results, and 90% indicated that their risk of having a child with CF was not zero. Written and video educational materials can be used without face-to-face counseling to inform most people about carrier screening and their test results. These materials may be less effective for those with lower educational backgrounds.     

Cystic fibrosis newborn screening: a pilot study to maximize carrier screening

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) is expanding because early diagnosis has been shown to result in improved nutrition and growth. Most newborns identified by a mutation panel have a single detected mutation and require sweat testing to exclude an additional undetected mutation. The resulting identification of CF carrier newborns, although not the primary purpose of screening, has three potential benefits, (1) the detection of trait-trait couples, (2) presymptomatic testing of these couples' previously born children who may have undetected CF, and (3) a carrier parent alerting his/her extended family members to the chance of also being a CF carrier. Reaping each benefit requires genetic counseling of parents and their accepting carrier testing. The purpose of this study was to utilize the sweat testing visit to educate parents about the value of carrier testing for themselves and their blood relatives. We compared special care (genetic counseling after explaining the sweat test result and offering of parental DNA testing, all on the sweat test visit) versus standard care (sweat test result reported by phone to the parents the next day by the newborn's physician, ideally with the recommendation to arrange genetic counseling and parental carrier testing). In the first year of New York State CF screening, 64 newborns with one detected mutation were reported in the nine-county region that includes Rochester. Of these, parents of 39 agreed to participate in the study and to be randomized to special or standard care. Sixty-one parents completed both the initial and 1-year follow-up questionnaires (30 couples and one mother). Of the 61 parents, 23 had carrier testing after the birth of the baby. The frequency of such parental testing was significantly higher in the special care group (17/34 or 50%) than in the standard care group (6/27 or 22%) (p < 0.05). This is the first evidence from a randomized trial that genetic counseling and offering carrier testing to parents on the sweat test visit increases identification of carrier parents. Such identification detects trait-trait parents and facilitates carrier testing among relatives.     

Cystic fibrosis carrier population screening in the primary care setting.

To determine the receptivity of prenatal care providers and their patients to carrier testing for cystic fibrosis (CF), we offered free carrier screening, followed by genetic counseling of carriers, to all prenatal care providers in Rochester, NY, for all their female patients of reproductive age, pregnant or not. Of 124 prenatal care providers, only 37 elected to participate, but many of these offered screening only to pregnant women. The acceptance rate among pregnant women was approximately 57%. The most common reasons for accepting screening were to obtain reassurance (50.7%) and to avoid having a child with CF (27.8 %). The most common reasons for declining screening were not intending to terminate a pregnancy for CF (32.4%) and believing that the chance of having a CF child was very low (32.2%). Compared with decliners, acceptors were more likely to have no children, regarded having a child with CF as more serious, believed themselves more susceptible to having such a child, knew more about CF, would be more likely to terminate a pregnancy if the fetus were shown to have CF, and more strongly supported offering CF screening to women of reproductive age. Of 4,879 women on whom results were obtained, 124 were found to be carriers. Of these 124 carriers, the partners of 106 were tested. Of the five at-risk couples, four requested prenatal diagnosis and one requested neonatal diagnosis. No woman found to be a carrier whose partner tested negative requested prenatal diagnosis. Except for the imperfect knowledge of those testing negative, none of the adverse outcomes predicted for CF carrier testing in the general population were observed in this study.     

Preconceptional cystic fibrosis carrier screening: opinions of general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians in the Netherlands

Knowledge of the opinions of physicians with regard to preconceptional cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier screening and the possible factors that are associated with their opinions is important for the implementation of such a screening program. Data were obtained from a study in which genetic knowledge, opinions with regard to genetic testing and related skills were investigated. A questionnaire, developed and used by American researchers, was adapted to the Dutch health care situation, and sent to randomly selected general practitioners (GPs) (n = 200), gynecologists (GYNs) (n = 300), and pediatricians (PEDs) (n = 265). In this part of the study, their opinions with regard to genetic preconceptional CF carrier screening in different situations were assessed. The response rate for the GPs, GYNs, and PEDs was 64%, 69%, and 72%, respectively. In total, 63% of the GPs, 69% of the GYNs and 72% of the PEDs supported preconceptional CF carrier testing if a couple requested a test. Sixteen percent, 19% and 25%, respectively, were in favor of actively offering a test with 95% test sensitivity to all couples who were planning a pregnancy. A positive opinion on preconceptional CF carrier screening was associated with the following variables: "considering the test sensitivity as less important" (GPs, GYNs), "high perceived risk of having a child with CF" (GYNs), "providing genetic counselling in their own practice" (PEDs) and "reassurance when both partners test negative" (PEDs). Physicians are sympathetic toward preconceptional CF carrier screening if the couples themselves request a test. Physicians had reservations about routinely offering a CF carrier test.     

Preconceptional cystic fibrosis carrier screening: attitudes and intentions of the target population

The aim of this study was to assess the attitudes and intentions of individuals planning a pregnancy with regard to preconceptional cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier screening and to determine factors associated with a positive and negative/neutral intention to have the test. A survey, based on a questionnaire, was conducted among a stratified random sample of 303 recently married couples (606 individuals). Of the eligible individuals, 70% (n = 380) participated. Of the respondents, 73% had a positive attitude toward a routine offer of preconceptional CF carrier screening, and 56% had the intention to participate in a screening program. A positive intention to have the test was associated with high perceived anticipation of regret, intended preconceptional behavior, high perceived pressure from experts, high perceived consequences of the test results, low perceived barriers, and low perceived negative consequences for family members. These results suggest that the offer of routine preconceptional CF carrier screening would lead to substantial acceptance among couples planning a pregnancy. Several variables related with intention were identified.     

The influence of experiential knowledge on prenatal screening and testing decisions

Minimal research focuses on the process of decision making in the context of prenatal screening and testing. This paper outlines an important contextual influence on these decisions. Specifically, we propose that experiential knowledge, particularly about pregnancy, screening, and disability, has a significant influence on prenatal screening and testing decisions. Drawing upon 38 semistructured interviews with women, this study explored how women made prenatal screening and testing decisions. Qualitative data analysis revealed two types of experiential knowledge, empathetic and embodied, which played a pivotal role in women's thinking about the value of prenatal tests and whether or not they accepted the offer of screening, testing, or both. We conclude that prenatal genetic counseling could benefit from an exploration of clients' experiential knowledge, both empathetic and embodied forms.     

Medical students' attitudes toward genetic testing of minors

The purpose of this study was to examine attitudes of medical students at a single university toward genetic testing in minors, defining attitudes as willingness to offer testing, and reasons for offering or not offering testing. A survey was distributed to all University of Arizona medical students (n = 428) during the 2003-2004 academic year. The survey consisted of three clinical vignettes concerning genetic testing for Huntington's disease (HD), BRCA1 breast cancer predisposition mutation, and cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier status. For each vignette, students responded to whether they would provide testing for a 7-year-old, a 17-year-old, and their reasons for each age and condition. One hundred thirty-five students (31.5%) responded to the survey. Medical students were significantly more likely to test a 7-year-old for CF carrier status (57%), than they were for a BRCA1 mutation (47%), and an HD mutation (40%). Students were significantly more likely to test a 17-year-old than a 7-year-old in each clinical scenario. Students who had completed a genetics course in medical school were significantly less likely to test a 7-year-old for a BRCA1 mutation than those who had not completed a formal course. Medical students' willingness to perform genetic testing in a minor is influenced by the type of condition, the age of the minor being tested, and the amount of genetics education received in medical school.     

Prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis carriers: an economic evaluation.

The cloning of the CFTR gene has made it technically possible to avert the unwanted birth of a child with cystic fibrosis (CF). Several large trials offering prenatal CF carrier screening suggest that such screening is practical and that identified carriers generally use the information obtained. Therefore, a critical question is whether the cost of such screening is justified. Decision analysis was performed that used information about choices that pregnant women were observed to make at each stage in the Rochester prenatal carrier-screening trial. The cost of screening per CF birth voluntarily averted was estimated to be $1,320,000-$1,400,000. However, the lifetime medical cost of the care of a CF child in today's dollars was estimated to be slightly>$1,000,000. Therefore, despite both the high cost of carrier testing and the relative infrequency of CF conceptions in the general population, the averted medical-care cost resulting from choices freely made are estimated to offset approximately 74%-78% of the costs of a screening program. At present, if it is assumed that a pregnancy terminated because of CF is replaced, the marginal cost for prenatal CF carrier screening is estimated to be $8,290 per quality-adjusted life-year. This value compares favorably with that of many accepted medical services. The cost of prenatal CF carrier screening could fall to equal the averted costs of CF patient care if the cost of carrier testing were to fall to $100.     

Role of the physician in screening for carriers of Tay-Sachs disease.

A screening test for carriers of Tay-Sachs disease has been available in Toronto for more than 6 years. In that time more than 11 000 Jewish residents have been tested. Most had requested testing after hearing about the screening program from friends or the media; few had been advised by their physicians to be tested. To sample the attitudes of physicians in Toronto towards carrier screening, we studied questionnaire responses of 42 physicians whose practices were composed largely of Jewish patients. Only 31% regularly advised their young adult Jewish patients to have a carrier screening test but 76% said they had patients who asked if they should be tested. Of the 14 (33%) who had had one or more patients with Tay-Sachs disease 6 did not advise carrier testing. There was a positive correlation between specialty training and support for the screening program. Methods for increasing physician advocacy of these programs are discussed.     

Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis among Maryland obstetricians before and after the 1997 NIH Consensus Conference

The 1997 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Conference on Cystic Fibrosis (CF) testing recommended that carrier screening be offered to all pregnant women and couples planning a pregnancy. We surveyed 492 Maryland Ob-Gyns before and after the consensus conference to: (1) assess whether obstetricians changed their practice regarding CF carrier testing, and (2) identify the factors associated with changing practice patterns, including awareness of the statement, and knowledge about CF. Fifty-six percent (275) responded to the first mail questionnaire and 107 obstetricians responded to both questionnaires. In 1998, only 18% of respondents to the second questionnaire were familiar with the NIH statement, but 43% reported discussing testing with patients with no family history, a significant increase from 1997, when only 20% reported discussing testing. Less than one-third correctly answered six multiple-choice knowledge questions about CF and carrier testing. In multivariate analysis, knowledge and familiarity with the NIH consensus statement were not associated with beginning to discuss CF carrier testing after the CF conference with their patients without a family history.     

Population programs for the detection of couples at risk for severe monogenic genetic diseases

Population genetic screening programs for carrier detection of severe genetic disorders exist worldwide, mainly for beta-thalassemia. These screening programs are either mandatory or voluntary. In several Arab countries and Iran, the state has made thalassemia carrier detection mandatory, while tests for detecting carriers are required by the religious authorities in Cyprus. In all the existing mandatory genetic screening programs, the couples have to get the information about the tests before marriage, but the decision whether or not to marry is left to them. Voluntary programs exist for instance in several Mediterranean countries for the prevention of thalassemia and for several genetic diseases among Jews. While voluntary programs leave the decision to be screened or not to the individual, a major problem is that in many cases awareness about the existence of screening tests is very sparse. Some programs, for instance in Canada or Australia, therefore provide education about genetic tests and screening at school in order to allow the individuals to be able to make an informed decision about their reproductive choices. This article represents the opinions of the author and not necessarily those of the Ministry.     

Rethinking counselling in prenatal screening: An ethical analysis of informed consent in the context of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)

Informed consent is a key condition for prenatal screening programmes to reach their aim of promoting reproductive autonomy. Reaching this aim is currently being challenged with the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in first-trimester prenatal screening programmes: amongst others its procedural ease—it only requires a blood draw and reaches high levels of reliability—might hinder women’s understanding that they should make a personal, informed decision about screening. We offer arguments for a renewed recognition and use of informed consent compared to informed choice, and for a focus on value-consistent choices and personalized informational preferences. We argue for a three-step counselling model in which three decision moments are distinguished and differently addressed: (1) professionals explore women’s values concerning whether and why they wish to know whether their baby has a genetic disorder; (2) women receive layered medical-technical information and are asked to make a decision about screening; (3) during post-test counselling, women are supported in decision-making about the continuation or termination of their pregnancy. This model might also be applicable in other fields of genetic (pre-test) counselling, where techniques for expanding genome analysis and burdensome test-outcomes challenge counselling of patients.     

PCR-based screening for cystic fibrosis carrier mutations in an ethnically diverse pregnant population.

As the most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in North America, cystic fibrosis (CF) is an obvious candidate for general population carrier screening. Although the identification of the causative gene has made detection of asymptomatic carriers possible, the extreme heterogeneity of its mutations has limited the sensitivity of the available DNA screening tests and has called into question their utility when they are applied to patients with no family history of the disease. The purpose of this study was to determine the technical feasibility, patient acceptance and understanding, and psychosocial impact of large-scale CF carrier screening in an ethnically diverse pregnant population. A total of 4,739 pregnant women attending prenatal clinics located in both an academic medical center and a large HMO were invited in person to participate. Of this group, 3,543 received CF instruction and assessments of knowledge and mood, and 3,192 underwent DNA testing for the six most common CF mutations, by means of a noninvasive PCR-based reverse-dot-blot method. Overall participation rates (ranging from 53% at the HMO to 77% at the academic center) and consent rates for DNA testing after CF instruction (>98%) exceeded those of most other American studies. The PCR-based screening method worked efficiently on large numbers of samples, and 55 carriers and one at-risk couple were identified. Understanding of residual risk, anxiety levels, and overall satisfaction with the program were acceptable across all ethnic groups. Our strategy of approaching a motivated pregnant population in person with a rapid and noninvasive testing method may provide a practical model for developing a larger CF screening program targeting appropriate high-risk groups at the national level, and may also serve as a paradigm for population-based screening of other genetically heterogeneous disorders in the future.     

Attitudes of deaf adults toward genetic testing for hereditary deafness.

Recent advances within molecular genetics to identify the genes for deafness mean that it is now possible for genetic-counseling services to offer genetic testing for deafness to certain families. The purpose of this study is to document the attitudes of deaf adults toward genetic testing for deafness. A structured, self-completion questionnaire was given to delegates at an international conference on the "Deaf Nation," held at the University of Central Lancashire in 1997. The conference was aimed at well-educated people, with an emphasis on Deaf culture issues. Eighty-seven deaf delegates from the United Kingdom returned completed questionnaires. The questionnaire had been designed to quantitatively assess attitudes toward genetics, interest in prenatal diagnosis (PND) for deafness, and preference for having deaf or hearing children. The results from this study provide evidence of a predominantly negative attitude toward genetics and its impact on deaf people, in a population for whom genetic-counseling services are relevant. Fifty-five percent of the sample thought that genetic testing would do more harm than good, 46% thought that its potential use devalued deaf people, and 49% were concerned about new discoveries in genetics. When asked about testing in pregnancy, 16% of participants said that they would consider having PND, and, of these, 29% said that they would prefer to have deaf children. Geneticists need to appreciate that some deaf persons may prefer to have deaf children and may consider the use of genetic technology to achieve this. Any genetic-counseling service set up for families with deafness can only be effective and appropriate if clinicians and counselors take into consideration the beliefs and values of the deaf community at large.     

Non-uptake of predictive genetic testing for BRCA1/2 among relatives of known carriers: attributes, cancer worry, and barriers to testing in a multicenter clinical cohort

BRCA1/2 test decliners/deferrers have received almost no attention in the literature and this is the first study of this population in the United Kingdom. The aim of this multicenter study is to examine the attributes of a group of individuals offered predictive genetic testing for breast/ovarian cancer predisposition who did not wish to proceed with testing at the time of entry into this study. This forms part of a larger study involving 9 U.K. centers investigating the psychosocial impact of predictive genetic testing for BRCA1/2. Cancer worry and reasons for declining or deferring BRCA1/2 predictive genetic testing were evaluated by questionnaire following genetic counseling. A total of 34 individuals declined the offer of predictive genetic testing. Compared to the national cohort of test acceptors, test decliners are significantly younger. Female test decliners have lower levels of cancer worry than female test acceptors. Barriers to testing include apprehension about the result, traveling to the genetics clinic, and taking time away from work/family. Women are more likely than men to worry about receiving less screening if found not to be a carrier. The findings do not indicate that healthy BRCA1/2 test decliners are a more vulnerable group in terms of cancer worry. However, barriers to testing need to be discussed in genetic counseling.