Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy on the Rap.RapGAP reaction, GTPase activation without an arginine finger

GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) down-regulate Ras-like proteins by stimulating their GTP hydrolysis, and a malfunction of this reaction leads to disease formation. In most cases, the molecular mechanism of activation involves stabilization of a catalytic Gln and insertion of a catalytic Arg into the active site by GAP. Rap1 neither possesses a Gln nor does its cognate Rap-GAP employ an Arg. Recently it was proposed that RapGAP provides a catalytic Asn, which substitutes for the Gln found in all other Ras-like proteins (Daumke, O., Weyand, M., Chakrabarti, P. P., Vetter, I. R., and Wittinghofer, A. (2004) Nature 429, 197-201). Here, RapGAP-mediated activation has been investigated by time-resolved Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Although the intrinsic hydrolysis reactions of Rap and Ras are very similar, the GAP-catalyzed reaction shows unique features. RapGAP binding induces a GTP(*) conformation in which the three phosphate groups are oriented such that they are vibrationally coupled to each other, in contrast to what was seen in the intrinsic and the Ras.RasGAP reactions. However, the charge shift toward beta-phosphate observed with RasGAP was also observed for RapGAP. A GDP.P(i) intermediate accumulates in the GAP-catalyzed reaction, because the release of P(i) is eight times slower than the cleavage reaction, and significant GTP synthesis from GDP.P(i) was observed. Partial steps of the cleavage reaction are correlated with structural changes of protein side groups and backbone. Thus, the Rap.RapGAP catalytic machinery compensates for the absence of a cis-Gln by a trans-Asn and for the catalytic Arg by inducing a different GTP conformation that is more prone to be attacked by a water molecule.     

Rsr1 and Rap1 GTPases are activated by the same GTPase-activating protein and require threonine 65 for their activation

The Rsr1 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been shown to be essential for bud site selection (Bender, A., and Pringle, J. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 9976-9980). This protein of 272 amino acids shares approximately 50% sequence identity with both Ras and Rap GTPases. However, neither GTP binding nor GTPase activity of the Rsr1 protein has been reported. The Rsr1 protein shares with human Rap1 GTPases the four specific motifs, i.e. Gly-12, residues 32-40, Ala-59, and residues 64-70, that are required for GAP3-dependent activation of the Rap1 GTPases. In this paper we demonstrate that the intrinsic GTPase activity of the Rsr1 protein is stimulated by GAP3 purified from bovine brain cytosol. The Rsr1 GTPase is not activated by either GAP1 or GAP2 which are specific for the Ras and Rho GTPases, respectively. Thus, it appears that the Rsr1 GTPase is a new member of the Rap1 GTPase family. Replacement of Gly-12 by Val in the Rsr1 GTPase completely abolishes the GAP3-dependent activation. The chimeric GTPases, Ras(1-60)/Rsr1(61-168) and Rsr1(1-65)/Ras(66-189), are activated by GAP3 but not by GAP1. Replacement of Thr-65 by Ser in the latter chimeric GTPase completely abolishes the GAP3-dependent activation, indicating that Thr-65 is required for distinguishing GAP3 from GAP1. We have previously shown that Gln-61 and Ser-65 are sufficient to determine the GAP1 specificity. Replacement of Thr-35 by Ala in the common effector domain (residues 32-40) of the chimeric Ras/Rsr1 GTPases completely abolishes GAP3-dependent activation.     

Functional interaction between p21rap1A and components of the budding pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The rap1A gene encodes a 21-kDa, ras-related GTP-binding protein (p21rap1A) of unknown function. A close structural homolog of p21rap1A (65% identity in the amino-terminal two-thirds) is the RSR1 gene product (Rsr1p) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Although Rsr1p is not essential for growth, its presence is required for nonrandom selection of bud sites. To assess the similarity of these proteins at the functional level, wild-type and mutant forms of p21rap1A were tested for complementation of activities known to be fulfilled by Rsr1p. Expression of p21rap1A, like multicopy expression of RSR1, suppressed the conditional lethality of a temperature-sensitive cdc24 mutation. Point mutations predicted to affect the localization of p21rap1A or its ability to cycle between GDP and GTP-bound states disrupted suppression of cdc24ts, while other mutations in the 61-65 loop region improved suppression. Expression of p21rap1A could not, however, suppress the random budding phenotype of rsr1 cells. p21rap1A also apparently interfered with the normal activity of Rsrlp, causing random budding in diploid wild-type cells, suggesting an inability of p21rap1A to interact appropriately with Rsr1p regulatory proteins. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found an Rsr1p-specific GTPase-activating protein (GAP) activity in yeast membranes which was not active toward p21rap1A, indicating that p21rap1A may be predominantly GTP bound in yeast cells. Coexpression of human Rap1-specific GAP suppressed the random budding due to expression of p21rap1A or its derivatives, including Rap1AVal-12. Although Rap1-specific GAP stimulated the GTPase of Rsr1p in vitro, it did not dominantly interfere with Rsr1p function in vivo. A chimera consisting of Rap1A1-165::Rsr1p166-272 did not exhibit normal Rsr1p function in the budding pathway. These results indicated that p21rap1A and Rsr1p share at least partial functional homology, which may have implications for p21rap1A function in mammalian cells.     

Rap-specific GTPase activating protein follows an alternative mechanism.

Rap1 is a small GTPase that is involved in signal transduction cascades. It is highly homologous to Ras but it is down-regulated by its own set of GTPase activating proteins (GAPs). To investigate the mechanism of the GTP-hydrolysis reaction catalyzed by Rap1GAP, a catalytically active fragment was expressed in Escherichia coli and characterized by kinetic and mutagenesis studies. The GTPase reaction of Rap1 is stimulated 10(5)-fold by Rap1GAP and has a k(cat) of 6 s(-1) at 25 degrees C. The catalytic effect of GAPs from Ras, Rho, and Rabs depends on a crucial arginine which is inserted into the active site. However, all seven highly conserved arginines of Rap1GAP can be mutated without dramatically reducing V(max) of the GTP-hydrolysis reaction. We found instead two lysines whose mutations reduce catalysis 25- and 100-fold, most likely by an affinity effect. Rap1GAP does also not supply the crucial glutamine that is missing in Rap proteins at position 61. The Rap1(G12V) mutant which in Ras reduces catalysis 10(6)-fold is shown to be efficiently down-regulated by Rap1GAP. As an alternative, Rap1(F64A) is shown by kinetic and cell biological studies to be a Rap1GAP-resistant mutant. This study supports the notion of a completely different mechanism of the Rap1GAP-catalyzed GTP-hydrolysis reaction on Rap1.     

Specificity in Ras and Rap Signaling

Ras and Rap proteins are closely related small GTPases. Whereas Ras is known for its role in cell proliferation and survival, Rap1 is predominantly involved in cell adhesion and cell junction formation. Ras and Rap are regulated by different sets of guanine nucleotide exchange factors and GTPase-activating proteins, determining one level of specificity. In addition, although the effector domains are highly similar, Rap and Ras interact with largely different sets of effectors, providing a second level of specificity. In this review, we discuss the regulatory proteins and effectors of Ras and Rap, with a focus on those of Rap.Ras-like small G-proteins are ubiquitously expressed, conserved molecular switches that couple extracellular signals to various cellular responses. Different signals can activate GEFs² that induce the small G-protein to switch from the inactive, GDP-bound state to the active, GTP-bound state. This induces a conformational change that allows downstream effector proteins to bind specifically to and be activated by the GTP-bound protein to mediate diverse biological responses. Small G-proteins are returned to the GDP-bound state by hydrolyzing GTP with the help of GAPs. Ras (Ha-Ras, Ki-Ras, and N-Ras) and Rap proteins (Rap1A, Rap1B, Rap2A, Rap2B, and Rap2C) have similar effector-binding regions that interact predominantly with RA domains or the structurally similar RBDs present in a variety of different proteins. Both protein families operate in different signaling networks. For instance, Ras is central in a network controlling cell proliferation and cell survival, whereas Rap1 predominantly controls cell adhesion, cell junction formation, cell secretion, and cell polarity. These different functions are reflected in a largely different set of GEFs and GAPs. Also the downstream effector proteins operate in a selective manner in either one of the networks.     

Characterization of a GTPase-activating protein for the Ras-related Ral protein

We have demonstrated the presence of a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for the Ras-related Ral A protein in the cytosolic fraction of brain and testis. This protein, designated Ral-GAP, was distinguished from Ras-GAP by its behavior in two chromatography systems and by the fact that the two GAP proteins did not stimulate the GTPase activity of each others target GTP binding proteins. The lack of effect of Ral-GAP on Ras GTPase activity also distinguished it from the product of the neurofibromatosis gene NF-1. Ral-GAP also differed from Rho-GAP and Rap-GAP by virtue of its elution from a gel filtration column with proteins of Mr greater than 10(6). This was likely an overestimate of the protein's molecular mass, however, since it sedimented in sucrose gradients between standard proteins of 150 and 443 kDa. Ral-GAP failed to promote the GTPase activity of mutant Ral proteins containing amino acid substitutions that in Ras lead to GAP-insensitive proteins.     

GIT proteins, A novel family of phosphatidylinositol 3,4, 5-trisphosphate-stimulated GTPase-activating proteins for ARF6

ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF) proteins are key players in numerous vesicular trafficking events ranging from the formation and fusion of vesicles in the Golgi apparatus to exocytosis and endocytosis. To complete their GTPase cycle, ARFs require a guanine nucleotide-exchange protein to catalyze replacement of GDP by GTP and a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) to accelerate hydrolysis of bound GTP. Recently numerous guanine nucleotide-exchange proteins and GAP proteins have been identified and partially characterized. Every ARF GAP protein identified to date contains a characteristic zinc finger motif. GIT1 and GIT2, two members of a new family of G protein-coupled receptor kinase-interacting proteins, also contain a putative zinc finger motif and display ARF GAP activity. Truncation of the amino-terminal region containing the zinc finger motif prevented GAP activity of GIT1. One zinc molecule was found associated per molecule of purified recombinant ARF-GAP1, GIT1, and GIT2 proteins, suggesting the zinc finger motifs of ARF GAPs are functional and should play an important role in their GAP activity. Unlike ARF-GAP1, GIT1 and GIT2 stimulate hydrolysis of GTP bound to ARF6. Accordingly we found that the phospholipid dependence of the GAP activity of ARF-GAP1 and GIT proteins was quite different, as the GIT proteins are stimulated by phosphatidylinositol 3,4, 5-trisphosphate whereas ARF-GAP1 is stimulated by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate and diacylglycerol. These results suggest that although the mechanism of GTP hydrolysis is probably very similar in these two families of ARF GAPs, GIT proteins might specifically regulate the activity of ARF6 in cells in coordination with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling pathways.     

Asparagine 26, glutamic acid 31, valine 45, and tyrosine 64 of Ras proteins are required for their oncogenicity.

Ras and Rap1 proteins are related GTP-dependent signal transducers which require Gly-12, the effector domain (residues 32-40), and Ala-59 for stimulation of their GTPase activities by GAP1 and GAP3, respectively. The replacement of Gly-12 by Val or Ala-59 by Thr potentiates the Ras oncogenicity and Rap1A antioncogenicity. However, the mutations in the effector domain, in particular the replacement of Thr-35 by Ala, abolish both Ras oncogenicity and Rap1A antioncogenicity, indicating that the effector domain is involved in interactions of these signal transducers with their targets as well as the GAPs. In this paper, we demonstrate that (i) replacement of Tyr-64 of the Ha-Ras protein or Phe-64 of the Rap1A protein by Glu or other non-hydrophobic amino acids reduces their intrinsic GTPase activities and abolishes their stimulation by GAP1 or GAP3, respectively, (ii) replacement of Tyr-64 by Gly and other non-hydrophobic amino acids results in complete loss of the oncogenicity of the v-Ha-Ras protein, indicating that the hydrophobic residue 64, in addition to the known effector domain, is essential for the Ras protein to interact with its target as well as GAP1. In addition we have found that Asn-26, Glu-31, and Val-45 of the v-Ha-Ras protein are required for its oncogenicity. Replacement of the Ras residues at either positions 26, 31, or 45 by the corresponding Rap1A residues abolishes the Ras oncogenicity.     

The product of the rap2 gene, member of the ras superfamily. Biochemical characterization and site-directed mutagenesis

The human rap2 gene encodes a 183 amino acid protein that shares 46% identity with the K-ras p21. Its cDNA was engineered and inserted into the bacterial expression vector ptac; this allowed the production of high levels of soluble recombinant protein in Escherichia coli that was purified to near homogeneity. The rap2 protein binds GTP and exhibits a low intrinsic GTPase activity (rate constant of 0.5 x 10(-2) min-1). It exchanges its bound GDP with a half-life of 18 min at 37 degrees C in the presence of 10 mM Mg2+. Under the same conditions, the dissociation of bound GTP was at least 25-fold slower showing that the rap2 protein has a much higher affinity for GTP than GDP. The contribution of individual domains of the protein to its biochemical activities was investigated by site-directed mutagenesis. Substitution of Val for Gly at position 12 results in a 2-fold decrease in the GDP dissociation rate constant and GTPase activity. Replacement of the Ser at position 17 by Asn severely impairs the GTP binding ability of the protein and points to an important role of this residue in the coordination of Mg2+. Mutation of Thr-35 to Ala results in a decreased affinity for GTP and a reduction (3-fold) of the GTPase activity. Finally, substitution of Thr-145 by Ile leads to an imperfect binding of guanyl nucleotides as exemplified by an increase in their dissociation rate constants and reduction of the GTPase activity of the protein. These properties of the normal and mutant rap2 proteins are compared with those of ras p21 carrying similar substitutions and are discussed in relation to the structural models proposed for ras p21.     

Regulation of the GTPase activity of the ras-related rap2 protein.

The small GTP-binding protein rap2A exhibits a high level of identity with rap1 and ras proteins (60% and 46%, respectively). Nevertheless, its intrinsic GTPase activity is not stimulated by ras-GAP, and unlike the rap1A protein, it cannot compete with ras proteins for their interaction with ras-GAP. In addition, rap1-GAPm that is highly active on the GTPase activity of the rap1A product, also stimulates the GTPase activity of the rap2A protein but with a 30-40-fold lower efficiency. An activity that greatly stimulated the GTPase activity of the rap2 protein (rap2-GAP) was found in bovine brain cytosol and purified. However, it copurified with the cytosolic form of rap1-GAP and was more efficient at stimulating the GTPase activity of the rap1 protein; this 55 kD polypeptide, that is recognized by an antibody raised against rap1-GAPm, likely represents a degraded and soluble form of the full size 89 kD molecule. In bovine brain membranes, a weak GAP activity toward the rap2A protein was also detected; however, it was also attributable to the membrane-associated rap1-GAPm. Thus, it appears that a single rap-GAP protein, complete or degraded, is able to stimulate the GTPase activity of both rap1 and rap2 proteins.     

Probing the GTPase cycle with real-time NMR: GAP and GEF activities in cell extracts

The Ras superfamily of small GTPases is a large family of switch-like proteins that control diverse cellular functions, and their deregulation is associated with multiple disease processes. When bound to GTP they adopt a conformation that interacts with effector proteins, whereas the GDP-bound state is generally biologically inactive. GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) promote hydrolysis of GTP, thus impeding the biological activity of GTPases, whereas guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) promote exchange of GDP for GTP and activate GTPase proteins. A number of methods have been developed to assay GTPase nucleotide hydrolysis and exchange, as well as the activity of GAPs and GEFs. The kinetics of these reactions are often studied with purified proteins and fluorescent nucleotide analogs, which have been shown to non-specifically impact hydrolysis and exchange. Most GAPs and GEFs are large multidomain proteins subject to complex regulation that is challenging to reconstitute in vitro. In cells, the activities of full-length GAPs or GEFs are typically assayed indirectly on the basis of nucleotide loading of the cognate GTPase, or by exploiting their interaction with effector proteins. Here, we describe a recently developed real-time NMR method to assay kinetics of nucleotide exchange and hydrolysis reactions by direct monitoring of nucleotide-dependent structural changes in an isotopically labeled GTPase. The unambiguous readout of this method makes it possible to precisely measure GAP and GEF activities from extracts of mammalian cells, enabling studies of their catalytic and regulatory mechanisms. We present examples of NMR-based assays of full-length GAPs and GEFs overexpressed in mammalian cells.     

Unravelling the mechanism of dual‐specificity GAPs

The molecular mechanism by which dual‐specificity RasGAPs of the Gap1 subfamily activate the GTP hydrolysis of both Rap and Ras is an unresolved phenomenon. RasGAPs and RapGAPs use different strategies to stimulate the GTPase reaction of their cognate G‐proteins. RasGAPs contribute an arginine finger to orient through the Gln61 of Ras the nucleophilic water molecule. RapGAP contributes an asparagine (Asn thumb) into the active site to substitute for the missing Gln61. Here, by using steady‐state kinetic assays and time‐resolved Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) experiments with wild type and mutant proteins, we unravel the remarkable mechanism for the specificity switch. The plasticity of GAP1^IP4BP and RASAL is mediated by the extra GTPase‐activating protein (GAP) domains, which promote a different orientation of Ras and Rap's switch‐II and catalytic residues in the active site. Thereby, Gln63 in Rap adopts the catalytic role normally taken by Gln61 of Ras. This re‐orientation requires specific interactions between switch‐II of Rap and helix‐α6 of GAPs. This supports the notion that the specificities of fl proteins versus GAP domains are potentially different.     

GAPs galore! A survey of putative Ras superfamily GTPase activating proteins in man and Drosophila

Typical members of the Ras superfamily of small monomeric GTP-binding proteins function as regulators of diverse processes by cycling between biologically active GTP- and inactive GDP-bound conformations. Proteins that control this cycling include guanine nucleotide exchange factors or GEFs, which activate Ras superfamily members by catalyzing GTP for GDP exchange, and GTPase activating proteins or GAPs, which accelerate the low intrinsic GTP hydrolysis rate of typical Ras superfamily members, thus causing their inactivation. Two among the latter class of proteins have been implicated in common genetic disorders associated with an increased cancer risk, neurofibromatosis-1, and tuberous sclerosis. To facilitate genetic analysis, I surveyed Drosophila and human sequence databases for genes predicting proteins related to GAPs for Ras superfamily members. Remarkably, close to 0.5% of genes in both species (173 human and 64 Drosophila genes) predict proteins related to GAPs for Arf, Rab, Ran, Rap, Ras, Rho, and Sar family GTPases. Information on these genes has been entered into a pair of relational databases, which can be used to identify evolutionary conserved proteins that are likely to serve basic biological functions, and which can be updated when definitive information on the coding potential of both genomes becomes available.     

Molecular cloning of a GTPase activating protein specific for the Krev-1 protein p21rap1

The rap1/Krev-1 gene encodes a ras-related protein that suppresses transformation by ras oncogenes. We have purified an 88 kd GTPase activating protein (GAP), specific for the rap1/Krev-1 gene product, from bovine brain. Based on partial amino acid sequences obtained from this protein, a 3.3 kb cDNA was isolated from a human brain library. Expression of the cDNA in insect Sf9 cells resulted in high level production of an 85-95 kd rap1GAP that specifically stimulated the GTPase activity of p21rap1. The complete deduced amino acid sequence is not homologous to any known protein sequences, including GAPs specific for p21ras. Northern and Western blotting analysis indicate that rap1GAP is not ubiquitously expressed and appears most abundant in fetal tissues and certain tumor cell lines, particularly the Wilms' kidney tumor, SK-NEP-1, and the melanoma, SK-MEL-3, cell lines.     

Mechanism of the spatio-temporal regulation of Ras and Rap1

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) activates Ras and Rap1 at distinct intracellular regions. Here, we explored the mechanism underlying this phenomenon. We originally noticed that in cells expressing Epac, a cAMP-dependent Rap1 GEF (guanine nucleotide exchange factor), cAMP activated Rap1 at the perinuclear region, as did EGF. However, in cells expressing e-GRF, a recombinant cAMP-responsive Ras GEF, cAMP activated Ras at the peripheral plasma membrane. Based on the uniform cytoplasmic expression of Epac and e-GRF, GEF did not appear to account for the non-uniform increase in the activities of Ras and Rap1. In contrast, when we used probes with reduced sensitivity to GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), both Ras and Rap1 appeared to be activated uniformly in the EGF-stimulated cells. Furthermore, we calculated the local rate constants of GEFs and GAPs from the video images of Ras activation and found that GAP activity was higher at the central plasma membrane than the periphery. Thus we propose that GAP primarily dictates the spatial regulation of Ras family G proteins, whereas GEF primarily determines the timing of Ras activation.     

Rap1 GTPases: an emerging role in the cardiovasculature

The Ras related GTPase Rap has been implicated in multiple cellular functions. A vital role for Rap GTPase in the cardiovasculature is emerging from recent studies. These small monomeric G proteins act as molecular switches, coupling extracellular stimulation to intracellular signaling through second messengers. This member of the Ras superfamily was once described as the transformation suppressor with the ability to ameliorate the Ras transformed phenotype; however, further studies uncovered a unique set of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) and effector proteins for Rap suggesting a more sophisticated role for this small GTPase. At least three different second messengers can activate Rap, namely cyclic AMP (cAMP), calcium and diacylglycerol. More recently, an investigation of Rap in the cardiovasculature has revealed multiple pathways of regulation involving Rap in this system. Two closely related isoforms of Rap1 exist, 1a and 1b. Murine genetic models exist for both and have been described. Although thought at first to be functionally redundant, these isoforms have differing roles in the cardiovasculature. The activation of Rap1a and 1b in various cell types of the cardiovasculature leads to alterations in cell attachment, migration and cell junction formation. This review will focus on the role of these Rap1 GTPases in hematopoietic, endothelial, smooth muscle, and cardiac myocyte function, and conclude with their potential role in human disease.     

The beta-subunit of the signal recognition particle receptor is a novel GTP-binding protein without intrinsic GTPase activity

The beta-subunit of the signal recognition particle receptor (SRbeta), a member of the Ras family of small molecular weight GTPases, is involved in the targeting of nascent polypeptide chains to the protein translocation machinery in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. We purified SRbeta from an expressing strain of Escherichia coli and investigated the properties of the isolated GTPase. We find that, unlike other Ras family GTPases, most SRbeta purifies bound to GTP, and SRbeta-bound GTP is not easily exchanged with solution GTP. SRbeta possesses no detectable GTPase activity. Although a stable interaction between SRbeta and ribosomes is observed, SRbeta is not stimulated to hydrolyze GTP when incubated with ribosomes or ribosome-nascent chains. A GTPase mutant harboring a mutation in a region predicted to be functionally important, based on observations made in related GTPases, binds GTP with faster kinetics and appears to be a less stable protein but otherwise displays similar properties to the wild-type SRbeta GTPase. Our results demonstrate that as an isolated GTPase, SRbeta functions differently from the Arf- and Ras-type GTPases that it is most closely related to by sequence.     

The Ability of GAP1IP4BP To Function as a Rap1 GTPase-Activating Protein (GAP) Requires Its Ras GAP-Related Domain and an Arginine Finger Rather than an Asparagine Thumb

GAP1^IP4BP is a member of the GAP1 family of Ras GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) that includes GAP1^m, CAPRI, and RASAL. Composed of a central Ras GAP-related domain (RasGRD), surrounded by amino-terminal C2 domains and a carboxy-terminal PH/Btk domain, these proteins, with the notable exception of GAP1^m, possess an unexpected arginine finger-dependent GAP activity on the Ras-related protein Rap1 (S. Kupzig, D. Deaconescu, D. Bouyoucef, S. A. Walker, Q. Liu, C. L. Polte, O. Daumke, T. Ishizaki, P. J. Lockyer, A. Wittinghofer, and P. J. Cullen, J. Biol. Chem. 281:9891-9900, 2006). Here, we have examined the mechanism through which GAP1^IP4BP can function as a Rap1 GAP. We show that deletion of domains on either side of the RasGRD, while not affecting Ras GAP activity, do dramatically perturb Rap1 GAP activity. By utilizing GAP1^IP4BP/GAP1^m chimeras, we establish that although the C2 and PH/Btk domains are required to stabilize the RasGRD, it is this domain which contains the catalytic machinery required for Rap1 GAP activity. Finally, a key residue in Rap1-specific GAPs is a catalytic asparagine, the so-called asparagine thumb. By generating a molecular model describing the predicted Rap1-binding site in the RasGRD of GAP1^IP4BP, we show that mutagenesis of individual asparagine or glutamine residues that lie in close proximity to the predicted binding site has no detectable effect on the in vivo Rap1 GAP activity of GAP1^IP4BP. In contrast, we present evidence consistent with a model in which the RasGRD of GAP1^IP4BP functions to stabilize the switch II region of Rap1, allowing stabilization of the transition state during GTP hydrolysis initiated by the arginine finger.The Ras-like family of small GTPases are ubiquitously expressed, evolutionarily conserved proteins that, by undergoing conformational changes in response to the alternate binding of GDP and GTP, function as binary switches (28, 31, 35). The GDP-bound “off” state and the GTP-bound “on” state recognize distinct effector proteins, thereby allowing the regulation of a variety of downstream signaling events (28, 31, 35). While Ras is the best-known and best-studied Ras-like GTPase, Rap1 has recently attracted considerable attention (reviewed in reference 20).Rap1 was originally identified through its ability, when overexpressed, to reverse the phenotype of K-Ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells (19). As Ras and Rap1 have very similar effector regions, the ability of Rap1 to reverse the transformed phenotype appeared to arise through an ability to compete with K-Ras effectors. For example, Rap1 binds the Ras effector Raf1 but this does not lead to its activation (11). This is consistent with a simple model in which Rap1 functions as a Ras antagonist (6, 37). However, recent work has challenged this view. Increasing evidence points to Rap1 interacting with its own panel of effectors through which it controls cell-cell adhesion and cell-matrix interactions (reviewed in reference 20).Like that of other GTPases, the activation of Ras and Rap1 is regulated through guanine nucleotide exchange factors, which control activation by stimulating the exchange of GDP for GTP. Inactivation is driven by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). These enhance the intrinsic GTPase activity of Ras and Rap1, thereby leading to GTP hydrolysis. A wide variety of guanine nucleotide exchange factors and GAPs specific for these GTPases have been identified (14). Through the arrangement of different modular domains, these proteins are regulated following the activation of cell surface receptors. This occurs either through direct association with the activated receptor or indirectly through second messengers (4, 5, 14, 41).Mammalian proteins capable of functioning as Ras GAPs include NF1 (3, 27, 40), p120^GAP (38), the semaphorin 4D receptor plexin-B1 (29), and members of the GAP1 (reviewed in reference 41) and SynGAP (DAB2IP, nGAP, and SynGAP) families (10, 18, 39). These function as Ras GAPs by supplying a catalytic arginine residue—the arginine finger—into the active site of Ras. This stabilizes the transition state of the GTPase reaction, increasing the reaction rate by more than 1,000-fold (1, 33, 34).Rap1 GAPs include Rap GAPs I and II, the SPA-1 family (SPA-1, SPAR, SPAL, and E6TP1), and tuberin (16, 17, 26, 32). Unlike Ras, Rap1 does not possess the catalytic glutamine residue that is critical for GTP hydrolysis in Ras. This fundamental difference means that the mechanisms by which Ras and Rap1 GAPs function are distinct. Rap1 GAPs do not employ a catalytic arginine residue (8, 9); instead, they provide a catalytic asparagine—the asparagine thumb—to stimulate GTP hydrolysis (15). Here the asparagine carboxamide side chain has a function similar to that of the glutamine residue in Ras, stabilizing the position of the nucleophilic water and γ-phosphate in the transition complex (15, 36).Given such distinct catalytic mechanisms, surprisingly, some Ras GAPs, while having no detectable sequence homology with any Rap1 GAPs, are capable of stimulating the GTPase activity of Rap1. The first protein found to display such dual activities was GAP1^IP4BP (13) (also known as RASA3, GAPIII, and R-Ras GAP). This is a member of the GAP1 family, which also comprises GAP1^m, CAPRI, and RASAL (2, 23-25). These proteins are characterized by a domain architecture comprising amino-terminal tandem C2 domains, a highly conserved central Ras GAP-related domain (RasGRD), and a carboxy-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain that is associated with a Bruton''s tyrosine kinase (Btk) motif (41). Consistent with the presence of the RasGRD, all proteins display Ras GAP activity, although each is differentially regulated following receptor stimulation (41). With the notable exception of GAP1^m, all GAP1 proteins also possess efficient Rap1 GAP activity (22). Such dual specificity is not restricted solely to GAP1 proteins. Recently, C2 domain-containing SynGAP—a neuronal Ras GAP—has also been shown to display Rap1 GAP activity (21), an activity that appears to require, alongside the RasGRD, the presence of a single C2 domain (30).Here we have examined the mechanism behind the dual Ras and Rap1 GAP activities of GAP1^IP4BP. Through the generation of a series of GAP1^IP4BP/GAP1^m chimeras, we have established that while the C2 domains of GAP1^IP4BP are required to stabilize the RasGRD, these domains do not supply catalytic residues required for Rap1 GAP activity. Rather, the Rap1 GAP catalytic machinery appears to reside solely within the RasGRD. By the site-directed mutagenesis of selected asparagine and glutamine residues within this domain—selected following the generation of a predicted molecular model of the GAP1^IP4BP RasGRD-Ras(Rap1) complex—we establish that the ability of GAP1^IP4BP to function as a Rap1 GAP does not occur via a mechanism that utilizes a classic asparagine thumb. Rather, we suggest that the GAP1^IP4BP RasGRD functions to stabilize the switch II region of Rap1 in a manner that allows a catalytic arginine finger from GAP1^IP4BP to drive the hydrolysis of GTP.     

Ras and Rap1: two highly related small GTPases with distinct function

The Ras-like family of small GTPases includes, among others, Ras, Rap1, R-ras, and Ral. The family is characterized by similarities in the effector domain. While the function of Ras is, at least in part, elucidated, little is known about other members of the family. Currently, much attention is focused on the small GTPase Rap1. Initially, this member was identified as a transformation suppressor protein able to revert the morphological phenotype of Ras-transformed fibroblasts. This has led to the hypothesis that Rap1 antagonizes Ras by interfering in Ras effector function. Recent analysis revealed that Rap1 is activated rapidly in response to activation of a variety of receptors. Rap1 activation is mediated by several second messengers, including calcium, diacylglycerol, and cAMP. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) have been identified that mediate these effects. The most interesting GEF is Epac, an exchange protein directly activated by cAMP, thus representing a novel cAMP-induced, protein kinase A-independent pathway. Furthermore, Rap1 is inactivated by specific GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), one of which is regulated through an interaction with Galphai. While Ras and Rap1 may share some effector pathways, evidence is accumulating that Ras and Rap1 each regulate unique cellular processes in response to various extracellular ligands. For Rap1 these functions may include the control of cell morphology.