Distinct requirements of Autophagy-related genes in programmed cell death

Although most programmed cell death (PCD) during animal development occurs by caspase-dependent apoptosis, autophagy-dependent cell death is also important in specific contexts. In previous studies, we established that PCD of the obsolete Drosophila larval midgut tissue is dependent on autophagy and can occur in the absence of the main components of the apoptotic pathway. As autophagy is primarily a survival mechanism in response to stress such as starvation, it is currently unclear if the regulation and mechanism of autophagy as a pro-death pathway is distinct to that as pro-survival. To establish the requirement of the components of the autophagy pathway during cell death, we examined the effect of systematically knocking down components of the autophagy machinery on autophagy induction and timing of midgut PCD. We found that there is a distinct requirement of the individual components of the autophagy pathway in a pro-death context. Furthermore, we show that TORC1 is upstream of autophagy induction in the midgut indicating that while the machinery may be distinct the activation may occur similarly in PCD and during starvation-induced autophagy signalling. Our data reveal that while autophagy initiation occurs similarly in different cellular contexts, there is a tissue/function-specific requirement for the components of the autophagic machinery.There is a fundamental requirement for multicellular organisms to remove excess, detrimental, obsolete and damaged cells by programmed cell death (PCD).^{1, 2} In the majority of cases caspase-dependent apoptosis is the principle pathway of PCD; however, there are other modes of cell death with important context-specific roles, such as autophagy.^{3, 4} Defects in autophagy have significant adverse consequences to normal cellular functions and contribute to the pathogenesis of numerous human diseases. This is particularly evident in cancer where depending on the context autophagy can have tumour-suppressing or -promoting roles. Given the number of clinical trials targeting autophagy in cancer therapy, it will be critically important to understand the context-specific regulation and functions of autophagy.⁵Autophagy is a highly conserved multi-step catabolic process characterised by the encapsulation of part of the cytoplasm inside a double-membrane vesicle called the autophagosome. Autophagosomes then fuse with lysosomes and the components are subsequently degraded by acidic lysosomal hydrolases.⁶ The process of autophagy can be functionally divided into four groups: (1) serine/threonine kinase Atg1 (ULK1 in mammals) complex and its regulators responsible for the induction of autophagy; (2) the class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) complex, which involves Atg6 and functions in the nucleation of the autophagosome; (3) the Atg8 and Atg12 conjugation systems, which involves several Autophagy-related (Atg) proteins essential for the expansion of autophagosome; and (4) Atg9 and its associated proteins including Atg2 and Atg18, which aids the recycling of lipid and proteins.⁷ In addition, several of the Atg proteins can function in multiple steps. For example, Atg1 interacts with proteins with different functions (e.g. Atg8, Atg18 and others), suggesting that it is not only required for initiation but also participates in the formation of autophagosomes.⁸ It is yet to be fully established if the context-specific functions of autophagy have distinct requirements for select components of the autophagy pathway.High levels of autophagy are induced in response to stress, such as nutrient deprivation, intracellular stress, high temperature, high culture density, hormones and growth factor deprivation.^{9, 10} The target of rapamycin (TOR) pathway is a central mediator in regulating the response to nutrients and growth signalling. TOR functions in two distinct complexes, with regulatory associated protein of TOR (Raptor) in TOR complex 1 (TORC1) or with rapamycin insensitive companion of TOR (Rictor) in TOR complex 2 (TORC2).^{11, 12, 13, 14, 15} Of these, TORC1 regulates autophagy; in nutrient-rich conditions, TORC1 activity inhibits the Atg1 complex preventing autophagy and cellular stress such as starvation leads to inactivation of TORC1 promoting a dramatic increase in autophagy. TORC2 can also negatively regulate autophagy via the FoxO3 complex in specific context.¹⁶Most direct in vivo evidence for a role of autophagy in cell death has emerged from studies in Drosophila.⁵ Developmentally regulated removal of the Drosophila larval midgut can occur in the absence of canonical apoptosis pathway, whereas inhibiting autophagy delays the process.^{17, 18} Also, inhibition of autophagy leads to delayed degradation of larval salivary glands in Drosophila.¹⁹ Genetic studies have shown that many of the Atg genes known to be involved in starvation-induced autophagy in the Drosophila fat body are also involved in autophagy-dependent degradation of salivary glands and midgut.^{5, 20, 21} However, systematic studies to test whether starvation-induced autophagy and autophagy required for PCD require identical components have not been carried out, and there are some observations suggesting that there may be distinctions. For example, in Atg7-null mutants autophagy is perturbed but the larval–adult midgut transition proceeds normally.²² In addition, a novel Atg7- and Atg3-independent autophagy pathway is required for cell size reduction during midgut removal.²³ Here we show that downregulation of TORC1 activity is required for induction of autophagy during midgut removal. Surprisingly, however, the requirement of part of the autophagy machinery during midgut degradation was found to be distinct to that which is required during autophagy induced by starvation. We report that Atg genes required for autophagy initiation, Atg8a and recycling are all essential for autophagy-dependent midgut removal, whereas other components of the elongation and nucleation steps are not essential.     

Neuritin 1 promotes retinal ganglion cell survival and axonal regeneration following optic nerve crush

Neuritin 1 (Nrn1) is an extracellular glycophosphatidylinositol-linked protein that stimulates axonal plasticity, dendritic arborization and synapse maturation in the central nervous system (CNS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the neuroprotective and axogenic properties of Nrn1 on axotomized retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in vitro and on the in vivo optic nerve crush (ONC) mouse model. Axotomized cultured RGCs treated with recombinant hNRN1 significantly increased survival of RGCs by 21% (n=6–7, P<0.01) and neurite outgrowth in RGCs by 141% compared to controls (n=15, P<0.05). RGC transduction with AAV2-CAG–hNRN1 prior to ONC promoted RGC survival (450%, n=3–7, P<0.05) and significantly preserved RGC function by 70% until 28 days post crush (dpc) (n=6, P<0.05) compared with the control AAV2-CAG–green fluorescent protein transduction group. Significantly elevated levels of RGC marker, RNA binding protein with multiple splicing (Rbpms; 73%, n=5–8, P<0.001) and growth cone marker, growth-associated protein 43 (Gap43; 36%, n=3, P<0.01) were observed 28 dpc in the retinas of the treatment group compared with the control group. Significant increase in Gap43 (100%, n=5–6, P<0.05) expression was observed within the optic nerves of the AAV2–hNRN1 group compared to controls. In conclusion, Nrn1 exhibited neuroprotective, regenerative effects and preserved RGC function on axotomized RGCs in vitro and after axonal injury in vivo. Nrn1 is a potential therapeutic target for CNS neurodegenerative diseases.Central nervous system (CNS) trauma and neurodegenerative disorders trigger a cascade of intrinsic and extrinsic cellular events resulting in regenerative failure and subsequent damage to neurons.^{1, 2, 3, 4, 5} The intrinsic factors include deregulation in growth-promoting factors, apoptotic factors, intracellular signaling molecules and trophic factors.⁶ Similarly, the extrinsic factors correlate to growth inhibition due to inhibitory cues^{3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13} that include myelin and myelin associated inhibitors, glial scarring,^{5, 14} slow clearance of axonal debris,⁷ incorrect development of neuronal projections⁶ and CNS inflammation.^{15, 16} Progressive degeneration of mature retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) has been associated with loss of trophic support,^{8, 9} detrimental inflammatory processes/immune regulation^{10, 11} and apoptotic effectors.^{9, 12, 13, 15, 17}After injury, mammalian RGC axons show only a short-lived sprouting response but no long-distance regeneration through the optic nerve (ON).¹⁶ Glial responses around the affected area are initiated by injured CNS axons.¹⁸ Axons undergoing Wallerian degeneration are surrounded by astrocytes that upregulate glial fibrillary acidic protein (Gfap) expression and these reactive astrocytes contribute to trauma-induced neurodegeneration.¹⁹ Glial scarring inhibits axonal transport after ON crush (ONC)^{5, 14} decreasing transport of proteins involved in neuroprotection and synaptic plasticity. Regenerative failure is a critical endpoint of these destructive triggers culminating in neuronal apoptosis^{3, 20, 21} and inhibition of functional recovery. Intrinsic factors affecting axonal regeneration after CNS injury are crucial for recovery and thus, dysregulation of genes involved in axonal plasticity and outgrowth can prove detrimental to the neuronal recovery.^{22, 23, 24}Current neuroprotection approaches include promoting survival of RGCs by intraocular injections of recombinant factors like ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) and peripheral nerve (PN) transplantations in vitro²⁵ and in vivo after injury.²⁶ Studies performed with glial cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor and neurturin protect RGCs from axotomy-induced apoptosis.²⁷ Further, in the ON injury model, RGC survival was promoted after deletion of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein homologous protein²⁸ and enhanced regeneration observed with co-deletion of kruppel-like factor 4 (Klf4) and suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (Socs3).²⁹ Intraocular administration of neurotrophin-4 (NT-4) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) after ON transection has also exerted neuroprotective effects on axotomized RGCs. In addition, PNs transplanted adjacent to ONs, ex vivo PN grafts with lenti-viral transduced Schwann cells, and stimulation of inflammatory processes have strong pro-regenerative effects on injured RGCs.^{26, 30, 31, 32, 33}In addition, using adeno-associated-virus (AAV) therapy, AAV mediated expression of CNTF in bcl2 overexpressing transgenic mice increases cell viability and axonal regeneration,³⁴ whereas BDNF promotes survival of RGCs.³⁵ Likewise, experiments with AAV–BDNF, –CNTF and –growth-associated protein 43 (GAP43) have shown that AAV–CNTF was the most crucial for promoting both long-term survival and regeneration.³⁶ The positive effects of CNTF are observed mainly through simultaneous deletion of both PTEN and SOCS3³⁷ and the concurrent activation of mTOR and STAT3 pathways.³⁸ Although CNTF shows robust increase and sustained axon regeneration in injured ONs of rodents, it causes axonal misguidance and aberrant growth.³⁹ Furthermore, it has been shown that CNTF acts as a chemoattractant. CNTF administration onto autologous PN grafts transplanted within transected ON increased regeneration, but these effects were significantly reduced after removal of macrophages from this site.⁴⁰ In addition, the effects of CNTF using PN grafts at ON transection sites are further subject to debate, as previously it has been shown that Ad-CNTF injections preserved RGC axons but did not induce regeneration of axotomized RGCs.⁴¹ Thus, other studies have addressed RGC survivability and axonal regeneration with CNTF and other growth factors,^{35, 36} but most trophic factors affect neuronal survival and regeneration differentially.Previous studies targeting neuronal apoptosis by overexpressing intrinsic growth factors, inhibiting apoptosis and enhancing regeneration in CNS trauma models have established that a multifactorial approach is required for successful and long-lasting therapeutic outcomes.^{6, 36} Current gaps still exist for a key gene that could effectively target neuroprotection, enhance neuron regeneration and sustain neuronal function.One key gene implicated in neuronal plasticity is Neuritin 1 (Nrn1), also known as candidate plasticity gene 15. It has multiple functions and was first identified and characterized when screening for candidate plasticity genes in the rat hippocampal dentate gyrus activated by kainate.^{42, 43, 44} Nrn1 is highly conserved across species⁴⁵ and translates to an extracellular, glycophosphatidylinositol-linked protein (GPI-linked protein), which can be secreted as a soluble form. Nrn1 stimulates axonal plasticity, dendritic arborization and synapse maturation in the CNS.⁴⁶ During early embryonic development, Nrn1 promotes the survival of neural progenitors and differentiated neurons,⁴⁷ while later in development it promotes axonal and dendritic growth and stabilization, allowing maturation and formation of synapses.^{43, 46, 48} In the adult brain, Nrn1 has been correlated with activity-dependent functional plasticity^{45, 49} and is expressed in post mitotic neurons.Nrn1 may be a crucial gene for neuroprotection and regeneration because growth factors such as nerve growth factor (NGF), BDNF and NT-3 as well as neuronal activity can potentiate the expression of Nrn1.^{44, 50} In addition, we reported that Nrn1 mRNA expression appears to be biphasic after ON axonal trauma, indicating a transient attempt by RGCs at neuroprotection/neuroregeneration in response to ONC injury.⁵¹ The dynamic regulation of Nrn1 coupled with neurotrophic effects may promote axonal regeneration in the CNS. To overcome CNS trauma, a new therapy geared towards neuroprotection and effective axonal regeneration is required to enhance a future multifactorial approach. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic effects of Nrn1 in mouse RGC cultures as well as in the mouse ONC model. We have identified a distinct neuroprotective and regenerative strategy that prevents neurodegeneration after ON injury. AAV2–hNRN1 expression vectors partially rescued RGCs from apoptosis, maintained RGC function, and initiated regeneration of injured axons.     

Adiponectin receptor-mediated signaling ameliorates cerebral cell damage and regulates the neurogenesis of neural stem cells at high glucose concentrations: an in vivo and in vitro study

In the central nervous system (CNS), hyperglycemia leads to neuronal damage and cognitive decline. Recent research has focused on revealing alterations in the brain in hyperglycemia and finding therapeutic solutions for alleviating the hyperglycemia-induced cognitive dysfunction. Adiponectin is a protein hormone with a major regulatory role in diabetes and obesity; however, its role in the CNS has not been studied yet. Although the presence of adiponectin receptors has been reported in the CNS, adiponectin receptor-mediated signaling in the CNS has not been investigated. In the present study, we investigated adiponectin receptor (AdipoR)-mediated signaling in vivo using a high-fat diet and in vitro using neural stem cells (NSCs). We showed that AdipoR1 protects cell damage and synaptic dysfunction in the mouse brain in hyperglycemia. At high glucose concentrations in vitro, AdipoR1 regulated the survival of NSCs through the p53/p21 pathway and the proliferation- and differentiation-related factors of NSCs via tailless (TLX). Hence, we suggest that further investigations are necessary to understand the cerebral AdipoR1-mediated signaling in hyperglycemic conditions, because the modulation of AdipoR1 might alleviate hyperglycemia-induced neuropathogenesis.Adiponectin secreted by the adipose tissue^{1, 2} exists in either a full-length or globular form.^{3, 4, 5, 6} Adiponectin can cross the blood–brain barrier, and various forms of adiponectin are found in the cerebrospinal fluid.^{7, 8, 9, 10, 11} Adiponectin exerts its effect by binding to the adiponectin receptor 1 (AdipoR1) and adiponectin receptor 2 (AdipoR2)^{12, 13} that have different affinities for the various circulating adiponectins.^{12, 14, 15, 16, 17} Several studies reported that both receptor subtypes are expressed in the central nervous system (CNS).^{7, 12, 18} As adiponectin modulates insulin sensitivity and inflammation,¹⁹ its deficiency induces insulin resistance and glucose intolerance in animals fed a high-fat diet (HFD).^{19, 20, 21} In addition, adiponectin can ameliorate the glucose homeostasis and increase insulin sensitivity.^{22, 23, 24} Adiponectin, which is the most well-known adipokine, acts mainly as an anti-inflammatory regulator,^{25, 26} and is associated with the onset of neurological disorders.²⁷ In addition, a recent study reported that adiponectin promotes the proliferation of hippocampal neural stem cells (NSCs).²⁸ Considering that adiponectin acts by binding to the adiponectin receptors, investigation of the adiponectin receptor-mediated signaling in the brain is crucial to understand the cerebral effects of adiponectin and the underlying cellular mechanisms.The prevalence of type II diabetes mellitus (DM2) and Alzheimer''s disease increases with aging.²⁹ According to a cross-sectional study, in people with DM2, the risk of dementia is 2.5 times higher than that in the normal population.^{30, 31} A study performed between 1980 and 2002 suggested that an elevated blood glucose level is associated with a greater risk for dementia in elderly patients with DM2.³² In addition, according to a 9-year-long longitudinal cohort study, the risk of developing Alzheimer''s disease was 65% higher in people with diabetes than in control subjects.³³ A community-based cohort study also reported that higher plasma glucose concentrations are associated with an increased risk for dementia, because the higher glucose level has detrimental effects on the brain.³¹ High blood glucose level causes mitochondria-dependent apoptosis,^{34, 35, 36} and aggravates diverse neurological functions.^{37, 38} Inflammation and oxidative stress, which are commonly observed in people with diabetes, inhibit neurogenesis.^{39, 40, 41} Similarly, neurogenesis is decreased in mice and rats with genetically induced type I diabetes.^{42, 43} In addition, diabetic rodents have a decreased proliferation rate of neural progenitors.^{43, 44} Furthermore, several studies suggested that an HFD leads to neuroinflammation, the impairment of synaptic plasticity, and cognitive decline.^{45, 46}Here, we investigated whether AdipoR1-mediated signaling is associated with cell death in the brain of mice on a HFD, and whether high glucose level modifies the proliferation and differentiation capacity of NSCs in vitro. Our study provides novel findings about the role of AdipoR1-mediated signaling in hyperglycemia-induced neuropathogenesis.     

Live imaging the phagocytic activity of inner ear supporting cells in response to hair cell death

Hearing loss and balance disorders affect millions of people worldwide. Sensory transduction in the inner ear requires both mechanosensory hair cells (HCs) and surrounding glia-like supporting cells (SCs). HCs are susceptible to death from aging, noise overexposure, and treatment with therapeutic drugs that have ototoxic side effects; these ototoxic drugs include the aminoglycoside antibiotics and the antineoplastic drug cisplatin. Although both classes of drugs are known to kill HCs, their effects on SCs are less well understood. Recent data indicate that SCs sense and respond to HC stress, and that their responses can influence HC death, survival, and phagocytosis. These responses to HC stress and death are critical to the health of the inner ear. Here we have used live confocal imaging of the adult mouse utricle, to examine the SC responses to HC death caused by aminoglycosides or cisplatin. Our data indicate that when HCs are killed by aminoglycosides, SCs efficiently remove HC corpses from the sensory epithelium in a process that includes constricting the apical portion of the HC after loss of membrane integrity. SCs then form a phagosome, which can completely engulf the remaining HC body, a phenomenon not previously reported in mammals. In contrast, cisplatin treatment results in accumulation of dead HCs in the sensory epithelium, accompanied by an increase in SC death. The surviving SCs constrict fewer HCs and display impaired phagocytosis. These data are supported by in vivo experiments, in which cochlear SCs show reduced capacity for scar formation in cisplatin-treated mice compared with those treated with aminoglycosides. Together, these data point to a broader defect in the ability of the cisplatin-treated SCs, to preserve tissue health in the mature mammalian inner ear.Hearing loss affects more than 360 million people worldwide and is often irreversible.¹ Mechanosensory hair cells (HCs), the receptor cells of hearing and balance, are not regenerated in the adult mammal and their death results in permanent hearing loss.^{2, 3} HCs are surrounded by glia-like supporting cells (SCs) that are necessary for HC survival and function (reviewed in Monzack et al.).⁴ SCs perform many functions, including providing critical trophic factors, preventing excitotoxicity, and mediating regeneration in those systems (non-mammalian vertebrates) capable of replacing lost HCs.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11} When HCs die, SCs also preserve the integrity and function of the remaining tissue by forming scars and clearing dead HCs.^{2, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17} Maintaining a fluid barrier at the surface of the sensory epithelium after damage is necessary to preserve the electro-chemical gradient that drives HC depolarization and therefore sensory transduction after the onset of hearing (reviewed in Wangemann).¹⁸Several major stressors cause HC death,^{19, 20, 21, 22} including aging, noise trauma, and exposure to therapeutic drugs with ototoxic side effects. When a HC is killed by noise or aminoglycoside antibiotics, surrounding SCs form a filamentous actin (F-actin) cable that constricts the HC at its apex.^{2, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17} This process separates the apical portion of the cell, including the stereocilia bundle, from the HC body and preserves a sealed reticular lamina.²³ In the chick utricle, following the apical constriction of dead HCs, the SCs engulf and phagocytose the remaining HC corpse.¹⁵ Additional data from the chick indicate that the ototoxic drug cisplatin impairs some SC functions, including regeneration of HCs or clearance of HC debris.²⁴ We hypothesized that SCs would have significant phagocytic activity in the mature mammalian inner ear, and that cisplatin would impair this activity. To examine these dynamic processes, we live-imaged SC phagocytic activity in the adult mouse utricle and compared the SC responses with HC stress and death caused by aminoglycosides versus cisplatin.     

New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus After Transplantation in a Cynomolgus Macaque (Macaca fasicularis)

A 5.5-y-old intact male cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fasicularis) presented with inappetence and weight loss 57 d after heterotopic heart and thymus transplantation while receiving an immunosuppressant regimen consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone to prevent graft rejection. A serum chemistry panel, a glycated hemoglobin test, and urinalysis performed at presentation revealed elevated blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels (727 mg/dL and 10.1%, respectively), glucosuria, and ketonuria. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed, and insulin therapy was initiated immediately. The macaque was weaned off the immunosuppressive therapy as his clinical condition improved and stabilized. Approximately 74 d after discontinuation of the immunosuppressants, the blood glucose normalized, and the insulin therapy was stopped. The animal''s blood glucose and HbA1c values have remained within normal limits since this time. We suspect that our macaque experienced new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation, a condition that is commonly observed in human transplant patients but not well described in NHP. To our knowledge, this report represents the first documented case of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation in a cynomolgus macaque.Abbreviations: NODAT, new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantationNew-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT, formerly known as posttransplantation diabetes mellitus) is an important consequence of solid-organ transplantation in humans.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} A variety of risk factors have been identified including increased age, sex (male prevalence), elevated pretransplant fasting plasma glucose levels, and immunosuppressive therapy.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} The relationship between calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus and cyclosporin, and the development of NODAT is widely recognized in human medicine.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} Cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fasicularis) are a commonly used NHP model in organ transplantation research. Cases of natural and induced diabetes of cynomolgus monkeys have been described in the literature;^14,43,45 however, NODAT in a macaque model of solid-organ transplantation has not been reported previously to our knowledge.     

Induction of COX-2-PGE2 synthesis by activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway contributes to neuronal death triggered by TDP-43-depleted microglia

Neuroinflammation is a striking hallmark of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and other neurodegenerative disorders. Previous studies have shown the contribution of glial cells such as astrocytes in TDP-43-linked ALS. However, the role of microglia in TDP-43-mediated motor neuron degeneration remains poorly understood. In this study, we show that depletion of TDP-43 in microglia, but not in astrocytes, strikingly upregulates cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production through the activation of MAPK/ERK signaling and initiates neurotoxicity. Moreover, we find that administration of celecoxib, a specific COX-2 inhibitor, greatly diminishes the neurotoxicity triggered by TDP-43-depleted microglia. Taken together, our results reveal a previously unrecognized non-cell-autonomous mechanism in TDP-43-mediated neurodegeneration, identifying COX-2-PGE2 as the molecular events of microglia- but not astrocyte-initiated neurotoxicity and identifying celecoxib as a novel potential therapy for TDP-43-linked ALS and possibly other types of ALS.Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an adult-onset neurodegenerative disease characterized by the degeneration of motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord.¹ Most cases of ALS are sporadic, but 10% are familial. Familial ALS cases are associated with mutations in genes such as Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TARDBP) and, most recently discovered, C9orf72. Currently, most available information obtained from ALS research is based on the study of SOD1, but new studies focusing on TARDBP and C9orf72 have come to the forefront of ALS research.^{1, 2} The discovery of the central role of the protein TDP-43, encoded by TARDBP, in ALS was a breakthrough in ALS research.^{3, 4, 5} Although pathogenic mutations of TDP-43 are genetically rare, abnormal TDP-43 function is thought to be associated with the majority of ALS cases.¹ TDP-43 was identified as a key component of the ubiquitin-positive inclusions in most ALS patients and also in other neurodegenerative diseases such as frontotemporal lobar degeneration,^{6, 7} Alzheimer''s disease (AD)^{8, 9} and Parkinson''s disease (PD).^{10, 11} TDP-43 is a multifunctional RNA binding protein, and loss-of-function of TDP-43 has been increasingly recognized as a key contributor in TDP-43-mediated pathogenesis.^{5, 12, 13, 14}Neuroinflammation, a striking and common hallmark involved in many neurodegenerative diseases, including ALS, is characterized by extensive activation of glial cells including microglia, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes.^{15, 16} Although numerous studies have focused on the intrinsic properties of motor neurons in ALS, a large amount of evidence showed that glial cells, such as astrocytes and microglia, could have critical roles in SOD1-mediated motor neuron degeneration and ALS progression,^{17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22} indicating the importance of non-cell-autonomous toxicity in SOD1-mediated ALS pathogenesis.Very interestingly, a vital insight of neuroinflammation research in ALS was generated by the evidence that both the mRNA and protein levels of the pro-inflammatory enzyme cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) are upregulated in both transgenic mouse models and in human postmortem brain and spinal cord.^{23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29} The role of COX-2 neurotoxicity in ALS and other neurodegenerative disorders has been well explored.^{30, 31, 32} One of the key downstream products of COX-2, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), can directly mediate COX-2 neurotoxicity both in vitro and in vivo.^{33, 34, 35, 36, 37} The levels of COX-2 expression and PGE2 production are controlled by multiple cell signaling pathways, including the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/ERK pathway,^{38, 39, 40} and they have been found to be increased in neurodegenerative diseases including AD, PD and ALS.^{25, 28, 32, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46} Importantly, COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib exhibited significant neuroprotective effects and prolonged survival or delayed disease onset in a SOD1-ALS transgenic mouse model through the downregulation of PGE2 release.²⁸Most recent studies have tried to elucidate the role of glial cells in neurotoxicity using TDP-43-ALS models, which are considered to be helpful for better understanding the disease mechanisms.^{47, 48, 49, 50, 51} Although the contribution of glial cells to TDP-43-mediated motor neuron degeneration is now well supported, this model does not fully suggest an astrocyte-based non-cell autonomous mechanism. For example, recent studies have shown that TDP-43-mutant astrocytes do not affect the survival of motor neurons,^{50, 51} indicating a previously unrecognized non-cell autonomous TDP-43 proteinopathy that associates with cell types other than astrocytes.Given that the role of glial cell types other than astrocytes in TDP-43-mediated neuroinflammation is still not fully understood, we aim to compare the contribution of microglia and astrocytes to neurotoxicity in a TDP-43 loss-of-function model. Here, we show that TDP-43 has a dominant role in promoting COX-2-PGE2 production through the MAPK/ERK pathway in primary cultured microglia, but not in primary cultured astrocytes. Our study suggests that overproduction of PGE2 in microglia is a novel molecular mechanism underlying neurotoxicity in TDP-43-linked ALS. Moreover, our data identify celecoxib as a new potential effective treatment of TDP-43-linked ALS and possibly other types of ALS.     

Calcineurin B-Like Protein-Interacting Protein Kinase CIPK21 Regulates Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses in Arabidopsis

The role of calcium-mediated signaling has been extensively studied in plant responses to abiotic stress signals. Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) constitute a complex signaling network acting in diverse plant stress responses. Osmotic stress imposed by soil salinity and drought is a major abiotic stress that impedes plant growth and development and involves calcium-signaling processes. In this study, we report the functional analysis of CIPK21, an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CBL-interacting protein kinase, ubiquitously expressed in plant tissues and up-regulated under multiple abiotic stress conditions. The growth of a loss-of-function mutant of CIPK21, cipk21, was hypersensitive to high salt and osmotic stress conditions. The calcium sensors CBL2 and CBL3 were found to physically interact with CIPK21 and target this kinase to the tonoplast. Moreover, preferential localization of CIPK21 to the tonoplast was detected under salt stress condition when coexpressed with CBL2 or CBL3. These findings suggest that CIPK21 mediates responses to salt stress condition in Arabidopsis, at least in part, by regulating ion and water homeostasis across the vacuolar membranes.Drought and salinity cause osmotic stress in plants and severely affect crop productivity throughout the world. Plants respond to osmotic stress by changing a number of cellular processes (Xiong et al., 1999; Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Boudsocq and Lauriére, 2005). Some of these changes include activation of stress-responsive genes, regulation of membrane transport at both plasma membrane (PM) and vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) to maintain water and ionic homeostasis, and metabolic changes to produce compatible osmolytes such as Pro (Stewart and Lee, 1974; Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). It has been well established that a specific calcium (Ca²⁺) signature is generated in response to a particular environmental stimulus (Trewavas and Malhó, 1998; Scrase-Field and Knight, 2003; Luan, 2009; Kudla et al., 2010). The Ca²⁺ changes are primarily perceived by several Ca²⁺ sensors such as calmodulin (Reddy, 2001; Luan et al., 2002), Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinases (Harper and Harmon, 2005), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Pandey, 2008; Luan, 2009; Sanyal et al., 2015), and other Ca²⁺-binding proteins (Reddy, 2001; Shao et al., 2008) to initiate various cellular responses.Plant CBL-type Ca²⁺ sensors interact with and activate CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) that phosphorylate downstream components to transduce Ca²⁺ signals (Liu et al., 2000; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Luan, 2009). In several plant species, multiple members have been identified in the CBL and CIPK family (Luan et al., 2002; Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Pandey, 2008; Batistič and Kudla, 2009; Weinl and Kudla, 2009; Pandey et al., 2014). Involvement of specific CBL-CIPK pair to decode a particular type of signal entails the alternative and selective complex formation leading to stimulus-response coupling (D’Angelo et al., 2006; Batistič et al., 2010).Several CBL and CIPK family members have been implicated in plant responses to drought, salinity, and osmotic stress based on genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants (Zhu, 2002; Cheong et al., 2003, 2007; Kim et al., 2003; Pandey et al., 2004, 2008; D’Angelo et al., 2006; Qin et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Held et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2012; Drerup et al., 2013; Eckert et al., 2014). A few CIPKs have also been functionally characterized by gain-of-function approach in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), and maize (Zea mays) and were found to be involved in osmotic stress responses (Mahajan et al., 2006; Xiang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009; Cuéllar et al., 2010).In this report, we examined the role of the Arabidopsis CIPK21 gene in osmotic stress response by reverse genetic analysis. The loss-of-function mutant plants became hypersensitive to salt and mannitol stress conditions, suggesting that CIPK21 is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress response in Arabidopsis. These findings are further supported by an enhanced tonoplast targeting of the cytoplasmic CIPK21 through interaction with the vacuolar Ca²⁺ sensors CBL2 and CBL3 under salt stress condition.     

Plasma membrane poration by opioid neuropeptides: a possible mechanism of pathological signal transduction

Neuropeptides induce signal transduction across the plasma membrane by acting through cell-surface receptors. The dynorphins, endogenous ligands for opioid receptors, are an exception; they also produce non-receptor-mediated effects causing pain and neurodegeneration. To understand non-receptor mechanism(s), we examined interactions of dynorphins with plasma membrane. Using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and patch-clamp electrophysiology, we demonstrate that dynorphins accumulate in the membrane and induce a continuum of transient increases in ionic conductance. This phenomenon is consistent with stochastic formation of giant (~2.7 nm estimated diameter) unstructured non-ion-selective membrane pores. The potency of dynorphins to porate the plasma membrane correlates with their pathogenic effects in cellular and animal models. Membrane poration by dynorphins may represent a mechanism of pathological signal transduction. Persistent neuronal excitation by this mechanism may lead to profound neuropathological alterations, including neurodegeneration and cell death.Neuropeptides are the largest and most diverse family of neurotransmitters. They are released from axon terminals and dendrites, diffuse to pre- or postsynaptic neuronal structures and activate membrane G-protein-coupled receptors. Prodynorphin (PDYN)-derived opioid peptides including dynorphin A (Dyn A), dynorphin B (Dyn B) and big dynorphin (Big Dyn) consisting of Dyn A and Dyn B are endogenous ligands for the κ-opioid receptor. Acting through this receptor, dynorphins regulate processing of pain and emotions, memory acquisition and modulate reward induced by addictive substances.^{1, 2, 3, 4} Furthermore, dynorphins may produce robust cellular and behavioral effects that are not mediated through opioid receptors.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29} As evident from pharmacological, morphological, genetic and human neuropathological studies, these effects are generally pathological, including cell death, neurodegeneration, neurological dysfunctions and chronic pain. Big Dyn is the most active pathogenic peptide, which is about 10- to 100-fold more potent than Dyn A, whereas Dyn B does not produce non-opioid effects.^{16, 17, 22, 25} Big Dyn enhances activity of acid-sensing ion channel-1a (ASIC1a) and potentiates ASIC1a-mediated cell death in nanomolar concentrations^{30, 31} and, when administered intrathecally, induces characteristic nociceptive behavior at femtomolar doses.^{17, 22} Inhibition of endogenous Big Dyn degradation results in pathological pain, whereas prodynorphin (Pdyn) knockout mice do not maintain neuropathic pain.^{22, 32} Big Dyn differs from its constituents Dyn A and Dyn B in its unique pattern of non-opioid memory-enhancing, locomotor- and anxiolytic-like effects.²⁵Pathological role of dynorphins is emphasized by the identification of PDYN missense mutations that cause profound neurodegeneration in the human brain underlying the SCA23 (spinocerebellar ataxia type 23), a very rare dominantly inherited neurodegenerative disorder.^{27, 33} Most PDYN mutations are located in the Big Dyn domain, demonstrating its critical role in neurodegeneration. PDYN mutations result in marked elevation in dynorphin levels and increase in its pathogenic non-opioid activity.^{27, 34} Dominant-negative pathogenic effects of dynorphins are not produced through opioid receptors.ASIC1a, glutamate NMDA (N-methyl-d-aspartate) and AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid)/kainate ion channels, and melanocortin and bradykinin B2 receptors have all been implicated as non-opioid dynorphin targets.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 30, 31, 35, 36} Multiplicity of these targets and their association with the cellular membrane suggest that their activation is a secondary event triggered by a primary interaction of dynorphins with the membrane. Dynorphins are among the most basic neuropeptides.^{37, 38} The basic nature is also a general property of anti-microbial peptides (AMPs) and amyloid peptides that act by inducing membrane perturbations, altering membrane curvature and causing pore formation that disrupts membrane-associated processes including ion fluxes across the membrane.³⁹ The similarity between dynorphins and these two peptide groups in overall charge and size suggests a similar mode of their interactions with membranes.In this study, we dissect the interactions of dynorphins with the cell membrane, the primary event in their non-receptor actions. Using fluorescence imaging, correlation spectroscopy and patch-clamp techniques, we demonstrate that dynorphin peptides accumulate in the plasma membrane in live cells and cause a profound transient increase in cell membrane conductance. Membrane poration by endogenous neuropeptides may represent a novel mechanism of signal transduction in the brain. This mechanism may underlie effects of dynorphins under pathological conditions including chronic pain and tissue injury.     

Implication of different domains of the Leishmania major metacaspase in cell death and autophagy

Metacaspases (MCAs) are cysteine peptidases expressed in plants, fungi and protozoa, with a caspase-like histidine–cysteine catalytic dyad, but differing from caspases, for example, in their substrate specificity. The role of MCAs is subject to debate: roles in cell cycle control, in cell death or even in cell survival have been suggested. In this study, using a Leishmania major MCA-deficient strain, we showed that L. major MCA (LmjMCA) not only had a role similar to caspases in cell death but also in autophagy and this through different domains. Upon cell death induction by miltefosine or H₂O₂, LmjMCA is processed, releasing the catalytic domain, which activated substrates via its catalytic dyad His/Cys and a proline-rich C-terminal domain. The C-terminal domain interacted with proteins, notably proteins involved in stress regulation, such as the MAP kinase LmaMPK7 or programmed cell death like the calpain-like cysteine peptidase. We also showed a new role of LmjMCA in autophagy, acting on or upstream of ATG8, involving Lmjmca gene overexpression and interaction of the C-terminal domain of LmjMCA with itself and other proteins. These results allowed us to propose two models, showing the role of LmjMCA in the cell death and also in the autophagy pathway, implicating different protein domains.Apoptosis is, in most cases, associated with and depends on the activation of cys-dependent peptidases, named caspases.^{1, 2} Once activated, initiator caspases induce a proteolytic cascade via the activation of effector caspases that ultimately cleave numerous substrates, thereby causing the typical morphological features of apoptosis.^{3, 4} Despite their essential role in apoptosis, caspases are also involved in non-apoptotic events, including inflammation, cell proliferation, cell differentiation⁵ and the cell survival process autophagy, a major catabolic process in eukaryotic cells that allows cells to survive nutrient starvation due to engulfment of a portion of the cytoplasm by a specific membrane, delivery to lysosomes or vacuoles and digestion by hydrolytic enzymes.^{6, 7, 8, 9, 10} Plants, fungi and protozoa are devoid of caspases but express metacaspases (MCAs).¹¹MCAs are cysteine peptidases of the clan CD, family 14, with a caspase-like histidine–cysteine catalytic dyad.^{12, 13} However, besides their distant similarity to caspases,¹⁴ MCAs prefer arginine/lysine in the P1 position, whereas caspases prefer aspartic residues.^{15, 16} The role of MCAs in cell death is still enigmatic. For example, in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, YCA1 has a role in cell death,^{17, 18} whereas, although only partly dependent on its conserved catalytic cysteine, it also facilitates the removal of unfolded proteins, prolonging cellular life span.¹⁹ Similarly, some metacaspases have roles, outside of death, in stress acclimation pathways, as in Aspergillus fumigatus²⁰ or in the unicellular planctonic organisms diatoms.^{21, 22} In Arabidopsis thaliana, AtMC1 is a positive regulator of cell death and a survival factor for aging plants,²³ whereas AtMC2 negatively regulates cell death.²⁴ Trypanosoma brucei TbMCA2, TbMCA3 and TbMCA5 and Leishmania major MCA are involved in cell cycle regulation.^{25, 26}Leishmania are parasitic protozoa responsible for the neglected tropical disease leishmaniasis, transmitted to humans by the bite of the sand fly. In the insect, parasites proliferate as free-living flagellated forms called procyclic promastigotes within the midgut before differentiating into virulent metacyclic promastigotes and migrating to the proboscis.^{27, 28} In the mammalian host, promastigotes are taken up by macrophages and transform into amastigotes. Under a variety of stress stimuli, apoptosis-like morphological and biochemical features have been described in Leishmania, among which are cell shrinkage, chromatin condensation, DNA fragmentation or mitochondrial depolarization.^{29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38} Despite the evidence of morphological and biochemical markers of cell death in dying Leishmania, very little is known about the cell death pathway and the implicated executioner proteins. Indeed, essential proteins involved in mammalian apoptosis, death receptors, small pro- and anti-apoptotic molecules and caspases, are apparently not encoded in the genome of Leishmania³⁹ and the role of Leishmania MCA in cell death is still controversial, certain authors suggesting a role as a negative regulator of intracellular amastigote proliferation, instead of having a caspase-like role in the execution of cell death.⁴⁰LmjMCA contains different domains: an N-terminal domain with a Mitochondrion Localization Signal (MLS),⁴¹ a caspase-like catalytic domain and a C-terminal proline-rich domain.⁴¹ On the basis of this domain structure, LmjMCA can be classified among the type I metacaspases,¹⁶ a subclass more generally defined in higher plants and characterized by the presence of an N-terminal prodomain and a short linker between the large and small subunits, as initiator caspases in metazoans.¹¹ Upon induction of cell death by heat shock, H₂O₂ or drugs like miltefosine or curcumin, LmjMCA is processed and the catalytic domain is released,⁴¹ liberating the C-terminal domain. It was therefore interesting to investigate the functional roles of the different domains.In this report, we studied the role of L. major MCA (LmjMCA), using an MCA-deficient strain and overexpressing independently the catalytic and the C-terminal domains. The results confirmed that MCA was not essential to L. major survival. In contrast, LmjMCA processing, releasing its catalytic and C-terminal domains, induced cell death in L. major, whereas the overexpression of Lmjmca gene triggered autophagy after interaction of the C-terminal domain with itself and with other proteins, acting on or upstream of the autophagic protein ATG8.     

A cellular screen identifies ponatinib and pazopanib as inhibitors of necroptosis

Necroptosis is a form of regulated necrotic cell death mediated by receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) and RIPK3. Necroptotic cell death contributes to the pathophysiology of several disorders involving tissue damage, including myocardial infarction, stroke and ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, no inhibitors of necroptosis are currently in clinical use. Here we performed a phenotypic screen for small-molecule inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)-induced necroptosis in Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD)-deficient Jurkat cells using a representative panel of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs. We identified two anti-cancer agents, ponatinib and pazopanib, as submicromolar inhibitors of necroptosis. Both compounds inhibited necroptotic cell death induced by various cell death receptor ligands in human cells, while not protecting from apoptosis. Ponatinib and pazopanib abrogated phosphorylation of mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) upon TNF-α-induced necroptosis, indicating that both agents target a component upstream of MLKL. An unbiased chemical proteomic approach determined the cellular target spectrum of ponatinib, revealing key members of the necroptosis signaling pathway. We validated RIPK1, RIPK3 and transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) as novel, direct targets of ponatinib by using competitive binding, cellular thermal shift and recombinant kinase assays. Ponatinib inhibited both RIPK1 and RIPK3, while pazopanib preferentially targeted RIPK1. The identification of the FDA-approved drugs ponatinib and pazopanib as cellular inhibitors of necroptosis highlights them as potentially interesting for the treatment of pathologies caused or aggravated by necroptotic cell death.Programmed cell death has a crucial role in a variety of biological processes ranging from normal tissue development to diverse pathological conditions.^{1, 2} Necroptosis is a form of regulated cell death that has been shown to occur during pathogen infection or sterile injury-induced inflammation in conditions where apoptosis signaling is compromised.^{3, 4, 5, 6} Given that many viruses have developed strategies to circumvent apoptotic cell death, necroptosis constitutes an important, pro-inflammatory back-up mechanism that limits viral spread in vivo.^{7, 8, 9} In contrast, in the context of sterile inflammation, necroptotic cell death contributes to disease pathology, outlining potential benefits of therapeutic intervention.¹⁰ Necroptosis can be initiated by death receptors of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily,¹¹ Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3),¹² TLR4,¹³ DNA-dependent activator of IFN-regulatory factors¹⁴ or interferon receptors.¹⁵ Downstream signaling is subsequently conveyed via RIPK1¹⁶ or TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β,^{8, 17} and converges on RIPK3-mediated^{13, 18, 19, 20} activation of MLKL.²¹ Phosphorylated MLKL triggers membrane rupture,^{22, 23, 24, 25, 26} releasing pro-inflammatory cellular contents to the extracellular space.²⁷ Studies using the RIPK1 inhibitor necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) ²⁸ or RIPK3-deficient mice have established a role for necroptosis in the pathophysiology of pancreatitis,¹⁹ artherosclerosis,²⁹ retinal cell death,³⁰ ischemic organ damage and ischemia-reperfusion injury in both the kidney³¹ and the heart.³² Moreover, allografts from RIPK3-deficient mice are better protected from rejection, suggesting necroptosis inhibition as a therapeutic option to improve transplant outcome.³³ Besides Nec-1, several tool compounds inhibiting different pathway members have been described,^{12, 16, 21, 34, 35} however, no inhibitors of necroptosis are available for clinical use so far.^{2, 10} In this study we screened a library of FDA approved drugs for the precise purpose of identifying already existing and generally safe chemical agents that could be used as necroptosis inhibitors. We identified the two structurally distinct kinase inhibitors pazopanib and ponatinib as potent blockers of necroptosis targeting the key enzymes RIPK1/3.     

Cell cycle-dependent Cdc25C phosphatase determines cell survival by regulating apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1

Cdc25C (cell division cycle 25C) phosphatase triggers entry into mitosis in the cell cycle by dephosphorylating cyclin B-Cdk1. Cdc25C exhibits basal phosphatase activity during interphase and then becomes activated at the G₂/M transition after hyperphosphorylation on multiple sites and dissociation from 14-3-3. Although the role of Cdc25C in mitosis has been extensively studied, its function in interphase remains elusive. Here, we show that during interphase Cdc25C suppresses apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1), a member of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase kinase kinase family that mediates apoptosis. Cdc25C phosphatase dephosphorylates phospho-Thr-838 in the activation loop of ASK1 in vitro and in interphase cells. In addition, knockdown of Cdc25C increases the activity of ASK1 and ASK1 downstream targets in interphase cells, and overexpression of Cdc25C inhibits ASK1-mediated apoptosis, suggesting that Cdc25C binds to and negatively regulates ASK1. Furthermore, we showed that ASK1 kinase activity correlated with Cdc25C activation during mitotic arrest and enhanced ASK1 activity in the presence of activated Cdc25C resulted from the weak association between ASK1 and Cdc25C. In cells synchronized in mitosis following nocodazole treatment, phosphorylation of Thr-838 in the activation loop of ASK1 increased. Compared with hypophosphorylated Cdc25C, which exhibited basal phosphatase activity in interphase, hyperphosphorylated Cdc25C exhibited enhanced phosphatase activity during mitotic arrest, but had significantly reduced affinity to ASK1, suggesting that enhanced ASK1 activity in mitosis was due to reduced binding of hyperphosphorylated Cdc25C to ASK1. These findings suggest that Cdc25C negatively regulates proapoptotic ASK1 in a cell cycle-dependent manner and may play a role in G₂/M checkpoint-mediated apoptosis.Cell division cycle 25 (Cdc25) phosphatases are dual-specificity phosphatases involved in cell cycle regulation. By removing inhibitory phosphate groups from phospho-Thr and phospho-Tyr residues of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs),¹ Cdc25 proteins regulate cell cycle progression in S phase and mitosis. In mammals, three isoforms of Cdc25 phosphatases have been reported: Cdc25A, which controls the G₁/S transition;^{2, 3} Cdc25B, which is a mitotic starter;⁴ and Cdc25C, which controls the G₂/M phase.⁵ Overexpression of Cdc25 phosphatases is frequently associated with various cancers.⁶ Upon exposure to DNA-damaging reagents like UV radiation or free oxygen radicals, Cdc25 phosphatases are key targets of the checkpoint machinery, resulting in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. The 14-3-3 proteins bind to phosphorylated Ser-216 of Cdc25C and induce Cdc25C export from the nucleus during interphase in response to DNA damage,^{7, 8} but they have no apparent effect on Cdc25C phosphatase activity.^{9, 10} In addition, hyperphosphorylation of Cdc25C correlates to its enhanced phosphatase activity.¹¹ Most studies with Cdc25C have focused on its role in mitotic progression. However, the role of Cdc25C is not clear when it is sequestered in the cytoplasm by binding to 14-3-3.Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1), also known as mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 5 (MAPKKK5), is a ubiquitously expressed enzyme with a molecular weight of 170 kDa. The kinase activity of ASK1 is stimulated by various cellular stresses, such as H₂O₂,^{12, 13} tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α),¹⁴ Fas ligand,¹⁵ serum withdrawal,¹³ and ER stress.¹⁶ Stimulated ASK1 phosphorylates and activates downstream MAP kinase kinases (MKKs) involved in c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 pathways.^{17, 18, 19} Phosphorylation and activation of ASK1 can induce apoptosis, differentiation, or other cellular responses, depending on the cell type. ASK1 is regulated either positively or negatively depending on its binding proteins.^{12, 13, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25}ASK1 is regulated by phosphorylation at several Ser/Thr/Tyr residues. Phosphorylation at Thr-838 leads to activation of ASK1, whereas phosphorylation at Ser-83, Ser-967, or Ser-1034 inactivates ASK1.^{24, 26, 27, 28} ASK1 is basally phosphorylated at Ser-967 by an unidentified kinase, and 14-3-3 binds to this site to inhibit ASK1.²⁴ Phosphorylation at Ser-83 is known to be catalyzed by Akt or PIM1.^{27, 29} Oligomerization-dependent autophosphorylation at Thr-838, which is located in the activation loop of the kinase domain, is essential for ASK1 activation.^{14, 18, 30} Phosphorylation at Tyr-718 by JAK2 induces ASK1 degradation.³¹ Several phosphatases that dephosphorylate some of these sites have been identified. Serine/threonine protein phosphatase type 5 (PP5) and PP2C dephosphorylate phosphorylated (p)-Thr-838,^{28, 32} whereas PP2A and SHP2 dephosphorylate p-Ser-967 and p-Tyr-718, respectively.^{31, 33} Little is known about the kinase or phosphatase that regulates phosphorylation at Ser-1034. Although ASK1 phosphorylation is known to be involved in the regulation of apoptosis, only a few reports show that ASK1 phosphorylation or activity is dependent on the cell cycle.^{21, 34}In this study, we examined the functional relationship between Cdc25C and ASK1 and identified a novel function of Cdc25C phosphatase that can dephosphorylate and inhibit ASK1 in interphase but not in mitosis. Furthermore, we demonstrated that Cdc25C phosphorylation status plays a critical role in the interaction with and the activity of ASK1. These results reveal a novel regulatory function of Cdc25C in the ASK1-mediated apoptosis signaling pathway.     

TRAF2 is a biologically important necroptosis suppressor

Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) triggers necroptotic cell death through an intracellular signaling complex containing receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIPK) 1 and RIPK3, called the necrosome. RIPK1 phosphorylates RIPK3, which phosphorylates the pseudokinase mixed lineage kinase-domain-like (MLKL)—driving its oligomerization and membrane-disrupting necroptotic activity. Here, we show that TNF receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2)—previously implicated in apoptosis suppression—also inhibits necroptotic signaling by TNFα. TRAF2 disruption in mouse fibroblasts augmented TNFα–driven necrosome formation and RIPK3-MLKL association, promoting necroptosis. TRAF2 constitutively associated with MLKL, whereas TNFα reversed this via cylindromatosis-dependent TRAF2 deubiquitination. Ectopic interaction of TRAF2 and MLKL required the C-terminal portion but not the N-terminal, RING, or CIM region of TRAF2. Induced TRAF2 knockout (KO) in adult mice caused rapid lethality, in conjunction with increased hepatic necrosome assembly. By contrast, TRAF2 KO on a RIPK3 KO background caused delayed mortality, in concert with elevated intestinal caspase-8 protein and activity. Combined injection of TNFR1-Fc, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc decoys prevented death upon TRAF2 KO. However, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc were ineffective, whereas TNFR1-Fc and interferon α receptor (IFNAR1)-Fc were partially protective against lethality upon combined TRAF2 and RIPK3 KO. These results identify TRAF2 as an important biological suppressor of necroptosis in vitro and in vivo.Apoptotic cell death is mediated by caspases and has distinct morphological features, including membrane blebbing, cell shrinkage and nuclear fragmentation.^{1, 2, 3, 4} In contrast, necroptotic cell death is caspase-independent and is characterized by loss of membrane integrity, cell swelling and implosion.^{1, 2, 5} Nevertheless, necroptosis is a highly regulated process, requiring activation of RIPK1 and RIPK3, which form the core necrosome complex.^{1, 2, 5} Necrosome assembly can be induced via specific death receptors or toll-like receptors, among other modules.^{6, 7, 8, 9} The activated necrosome engages MLKL by RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation.^{6, 10, 11} MLKL then oligomerizes and binds to membrane phospholipids, forming pores that cause necroptotic cell death.^{10, 12, 13, 14, 15} Unchecked necroptosis disrupts embryonic development in mice and contributes to several human diseases.^{7, 8, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22}The apoptotic mediators FADD, caspase-8 and cFLIP suppress necroptosis.^{19, 20, 21, 23, 24} Elimination of any of these genes in mice causes embryonic lethality, subverted by additional deletion of RIPK3 or MLKL.^{19, 20, 21, 25} Necroptosis is also regulated at the level of RIPK1. Whereas TNFα engagement of TNFR1 leads to K63-linked ubiquitination of RIPK1 by cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (cIAPs) to promote nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation,²⁶ necroptosis requires suppression or reversal of this modification to allow RIPK1 autophosphorylation and consequent RIPK3 activation.^{2, 23, 27, 28} CYLD promotes necroptotic signaling by deubiquitinating RIPK1, augmenting its interaction with RIPK3.²⁹ Conversely, caspase-8-mediated CYLD cleavage inhibits necroptosis.²⁴TRAF2 recruits cIAPs to the TNFα-TNFR1 signaling complex, facilitating NF-κB activation.^{30, 31, 32, 33} TRAF2 also supports K48-linked ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of death-receptor-activated caspase-8, curbing apoptosis.³⁴ TRAF2 KO mice display embryonic lethality; some survive through birth but have severe developmental and immune deficiencies and die prematurely.^{35, 36} Conditional TRAF2 KO leads to rapid intestinal inflammation and mortality.³⁷ Furthermore, hepatic TRAF2 depletion augments apoptosis activation via Fas/CD95.³⁴ TRAF2 attenuates necroptosis induction in vitro by the death ligands Apo2L/TRAIL and Fas/CD95L.³⁸ However, it remains unclear whether TRAF2 regulates TNFα-induced necroptosis—and if so—how. Our present findings reveal that TRAF2 inhibits TNFα necroptotic signaling. Furthermore, our results establish TRAF2 as a biologically important necroptosis suppressor in vitro and in vivo and provide initial insight into the mechanisms underlying this function.     

Thrombospondin-1 signaling through CD47 inhibits cell cycle progression and induces senescence in endothelial cells

CD47 signaling in endothelial cells has been shown to suppress angiogenesis, but little is known about the link between CD47 and endothelial senescence. Herein, we demonstrate that the thrombospondin-1 (TSP1)-CD47 signaling pathway is a major mechanism for driving endothelial cell senescence. CD47 deficiency in endothelial cells significantly improved their angiogenic function and attenuated their replicative senescence. Lack of CD47 also suppresses activation of cell cycle inhibitors and upregulates the expression of cell cycle promoters, leading to increased cell cycle progression. Furthermore, TSP1 significantly accelerates replicative senescence and associated cell cycle arrest in a CD47-dependent manner. These findings demonstrate that TSP1-CD47 signaling is an important mechanism driving endothelial cell senescence. Thus, TSP1 and CD47 provide attractive molecular targets for treatment of aging-associated cardiovascular dysfunction and diseases involving endothelial dysregulation.Endothelial cell (EC) senescence is accompanied with vascular dysfunction, including arterial stiffening and remodeling,¹ impaired angiogenesis,^{2, 3} reduced endothelial repair capability and increased incidence of cardiovascular disease.^{4, 5, 6} Cellular senescence can occur in vivo or in vitro in response to various stressors,^{7, 8, 9, 10} leading to suppression of cell proliferation. EC senescence has been reported to contribute to the pathogenesis of age-associated vascular diseases, such as atherosclerosis.¹¹ Thus, further understanding the mechanisms of EC senescence may help to identify effective targets for antisenescence therapy and treatment aging-associated cardiovascular disorders.Previous studies have shown that the secreted matricellular protein thrombospondin-1 (TSP1) is as potent inhibitor of angiogenesis¹² and its antiangiogenic activity is mediated by its receptors, CD36^{13, 14} and CD47.^{15, 16} CD47 is a ubiquitously expressed transmembrane protein that serves as a ligand for signal regulatory protein-α and is a signaling receptor of TSP1. The TSP1-CD47 pathway has an important role in several fundamental cellular functions, including proliferation, apoptosis, inflammation and atherosclerotic response.¹⁷ Ligation of CD47 by TSP1 has been shown to inhibit nitric oxide (NO)/cGMP signaling in vascular cells, leading to suppression of angiogenic responses.¹⁶ Recently, it was reported that lack of CD47 expression in ECs may enable these cells to spontaneously gain characteristics of embryonic stem cells.¹⁸ However, the potential role of CD47 in regulation of EC senescence has not been well explored. The present study was initiated to determine the role and mechanisms of TSP1-CD47 signaling pathway in regulating cell cycle progression and replicative senescence of ECs.