CXCR4 and CXCR7 transduce through mTOR in human renal cancer cells

Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has improved significantly with the advent of agents targeting the mTOR pathway, such as temsirolimus and everolimus. However, their efficacy is thought to be limited by feedback loops and crosstalk with other pathways leading to the development of drug resistance. As CXCR4–CXCL12–CXCR7 axis has been described to have a crucial role in renal cancer; the crosstalk between the mTOR pathway and the CXCR4–CXCL12–CXCR7 chemokine receptor axis has been investigated in human renal cancer cells. In SN12C and A498, the common CXCR4–CXCR7 ligand, CXCL12, and the exclusive CXCR7 ligand, CXCL11, activated mTOR through P70S6K and 4EBP1 targets. The mTOR activation was specifically inhibited by CXCR4 antagonists (AMD3100, anti-CXCR4-12G5 and Peptide R, a newly developed CXCR4 antagonist) and CXCR7 antagonists (anti-CXCR7-12G8 and CCX771, CXCR7 inhibitor). To investigate the functional role of CXCR4, CXCR7 and mTOR in human renal cancer cells, both migration and wound healing were evaluated. SN12C and A498 cells migrated toward CXCL12 and CXCL11; CXCR4 and CXCR7 inhibitors impaired migration and treatment with mTOR inhibitor, RAD001, further inhibited it. Moreover, CXCL12 and CXCL11 induced wound healing while was impaired by AMD3100, the anti CXCR7 and RAD001. In SN12C and A498 cells, CXCL12 and CXCL11 promoted actin reorganization characterized by thin spikes at the cell periphery, whereas AMD3100 and anti-CXCR7 impaired CXCL12/CXCL11-induced actin polymerization, and RAD001 treatment further reduced it. In addition, when cell growth was evaluated in the presence of CXCL12, CXCL11 and mTOR inhibitors, an additive effect was demonstrated with the CXCR4, CXCR7 antagonists and RAD001. RAD001-resistant SN12C and A498 cells recovered RAD001 sensitivity in the presence of CXCR4 and CXCR7 antagonists. In conclusion, the entire axis CXCR4–CXCL12–CXCR7 regulates mTOR signaling in renal cancer cells offering new therapeutic opportunities and targets to overcome resistance to mTOR inhibitors.Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most lethal malignancy among urological cancers with a total of 64 770 new cases and 13 570 deaths estimated in the United States in 2012.¹ A growing understanding of the molecular biology of RCC changed the therapeutic approach toward target-based agents. Since 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved six new target agents for metastatic RCC that antagonize two principal signaling pathways: the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR).² The mTOR is an atypical intracellular serine/threonine protein kinase regulated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K).³ mTOR exists in two distinct complexes termed mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) comprising mTOR, mLST8 (also termed G-protein β-subunit-like protein, GβL, a yeast homolog of LST8), raptor (regulatory associated protein of mTOR) and PRAS40 (proline-rich Akt substrate, 40 kDa), and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) comprising mTOR, mLST8, rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR), mSin1 (mammalian stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK)-interacting protein 1), protor (protein observed with rictor) and PRR5 (proline-rich protein 5).⁴ mTORC1 responds to amino acids, stress, oxygen, energy and growth factors and is sensitive to rapamycin; when active, mTORC1 promotes cell growth and also drives cell-cycle progression. Alternatively, mTORC2 regulates cytoskeletal organization and cell survival/metabolism and is sensitive to rapamycin over longer incubation times or at higher doses.³ mTORC1 controls cell growth and translation through the phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K) and of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4EBP1, which regulate either the translation of ribosomal proteins or the cap-dependent translation by inhibition of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E, respectively.^{3, 4} The activated mTOR pathway has been identified in several human malignancies, thus being an attractive target for anticancer therapy. mTORC1 activity is inhibited by rapalogs such as rapamycin (sirolimus) and associated analogs (temsirolimus/CCI-779, RAD001, ridaforolimus/AP23573).⁵ These drugs suppress mTORC1 activity forming a complex with FK506-binding protein 12. Temsirolimus (rapamycin analog) was the first mTOR inhibitor approved as first-line treatment in patients with poor-prognosis metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients,³ ridaforolimus is currently tested in phase III clinical trials⁵ and RAD001 is indicated as second-line treatment in patients with RCC at failure of first-line treatment with sunitinib or sorafenib. Other indications are subependymal giant cell astrocytoma associated with tuberous sclerosis and progressive neuroendocrine tumors of pancreatic origin.⁵ Although mTOR inhibitors prolong progression-free survival in patients with advanced RCC, most patients develop resistance to mTOR-inhibiting agents, limiting their efficacy; the new frontier of inhibiting the mTOR pathway is to identify agents targeting the feedback loops and crosstalks with other pathways involved in the acquired resistance to mTOR inhibitors.⁶Chemokines and their receptors have been implicated in regulating RCC growth, angiogenesis and metastases.⁷ In RCC, VHL mutation resulted in HIF-dependent CXCR4 activation⁸ and CXCR4 expression predicted poor tumor-specific survival.^{8, 9, 10} Recently, CXCL12 was shown to bind with high affinity the orphan receptor CXCR7/RDC1, which also binds a second ligand in the form of interferon-inducible T-cell α chemoattractant (I-TAC/CXCL11).¹¹ Whereas the CXCR4 activity is primarily G-protein-mediated, CXCR7 is considered an atypical GPCR because ligand binding does not result in intracellular Ca2+ release.¹¹ Some studies provided evidence that CXCR7 represents a ‘decoy'' receptor, which is responsible for either sequestering extracellular CXCL12¹² or modulating CXCR4 signaling by forming CXCR7–CXCR4 heterodimers.¹³ In contrast, others demonstrated that CXCR7 relays intracellular signals^{14, 15, 16, 17} and promotes cell motility^{18, 13, 19} acting through β-arrestin.^{20, 21} CXCR7 is highly expressed in human cancers such as prostate, lung, glioma, ovarian, breast cancer cells and in tumor-associated blood vessels and seems to be essential for survival, adhesion and growth of tumor cells.^{11, 14, 15, 22, 23, 24} It was recently demonstrated that CXCR4 and CXCR7 predict prognosis in RCC.^{10, 25} CXCL12 activates CXCR4 and the derived signaling can transduce on the mTOR pathway in pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer and T-cell leukemia cells;^{26, 27, 28, 29} antagonists targeting PI3K and/or mTOR inhibited CXCL12-mediated cell migration and this effect was primarily attributed to the inhibition of mTORC1 and consequent decrease in RhoA, Cdc42 and Rac1 in human gastric carcinoma cells.²⁸Aim of the study was to evaluate interactions between the CXCL12–CXCR4–CXCR7 axis and the mTOR pathway in human renal cancer cells to identify new therapeutic opportunities and overcome resistance mechanisms.     

PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway inhibitors enhance radiosensitivity in radioresistant prostate cancer cells through inducing apoptosis,reducing autophagy,suppressing NHEJ and HR repair pathways

The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway has a central role in cancer metastasis and radiotherapy. To develop effective therapeutics to improve radiosensitivity, understanding the possible pathways of radioresistance involved and the effects of a combination of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibitors with radiotherapy on prostate cancer (CaP) radioresistant cells is needed. We found that compared with parent CaP cells, CaP-radioresistant cells demonstrated G0/G1 and S phase arrest, activation of cell cycle check point, autophagy and DNA repair pathway proteins, and inactivation of apoptotic proteins. We also demonstrated that compared with combination of single PI3K or mTOR inhibitors (BKM120 or Rapamycin) and radiation, low-dose of dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitors (BEZ235 or PI103) combined with radiation greatly improved treatment efficacy by repressing colony formation, inducing more apoptosis, leading to the arrest of the G2/M phase, increased double-strand break levels and less inactivation of cell cycle check point, autophagy and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ)/homologous recombination (HR) repair pathway proteins in CaP-radioresistant cells. This study describes the possible pathways associated with CaP radioresistance and demonstrates the putative mechanisms of the radiosensitization effect in CaP-resistant cells in the combination treatment. The findings from this study suggest that the combination of dual PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibitors (BEZ235 or PI103) with radiotherapy is a promising modality for the treatment of CaP to overcome radioresistance.Radiotherapy (RT) is an important treatment option for prostate cancer (CaP) patients detected at early-stage or advanced-stage disease. Despite appropriate RT, up to 30% of treated high-risk CaP patients often experience local relapse and progression to metastatic disease.¹ One main reason for these failures following RT is because of radioresistance of a subpopulation of CaP clones within tumor. Therefore, radioresistance is a major challenge for the current CaP RT. RT dose escalation techniques have been used to counteract radioresistance. However, further dose escalations to 82 Gy in a phase II trial yielded significant acute and late morbidity.² Although three-dimensional conformal RT, intensity-modulated radiation therapy and image guided radiation therapy can increase the dose to local CaP and improve control rate,³ the clinical outcomes indicate that these advanced approaches cannot completely overcome radioresistance in CaP.⁴ Thus, modalities for improving the therapeutic efficacy of RT for locally confined or locally advanced CaP are warranted to increase sensitivity of radiation treatment in optimizing radiation effect and minimizing radioresistance influence.The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is an important intracellular signaling pathway in regulating cell growth, survival, adhesion and migration, particularly during cancer progression, metastasis and radioresistance,^{5, 6, 7, 8} and is frequently activated in cancer cells. PI3K activates a number of downstream targets including the serine/threonine kinase Akt that activates mTOR. Many valuable inhibitors targeting one protein (single inhibitor) or two proteins at the same time (dual inhibitor) in the pathway have been developed in recent years.BKM120 is a single PI3K inhibitor by inhibiting p110α/β/δ/γ and often results in tumor suppression,⁹ and Rapamycin is a single mTOR inhibitor and has been used in clinical trials against various cancer types.¹⁰ NVP-BEZ235 (BEZ235) is a potent dual pan-class I PI3K and mTOR inhibitor that inhibits PI3K and mTOR kinase activity and has been used in preclinical studies in many cancers to demonstrate excellent anticancer effects.¹¹ In addition, this inhibitor was the first PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitor to enter clinical trials in 2006.¹² PI103 is another potent dual pan-class I PI3K and mTOR inhibitor and selectively targets DNA-PK, PI3K (p110α) and mTOR.¹³ No reports have been published to test them in CaP-radioresistant (RR) cells as radiosensitizers to improve radiosensitivity so far. The mechanisms of these inhibitors in combination with RT in the treatment of CaP are unclear.Under a low-dose radiation treatment, we have recently developed three CaP-RR cell lines with increased colony formation, invasion ability, sphere formation capability and enhanced epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cancer stem cell (CSC) phenotypes and the activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway.⁷ In addition, we also found that the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is closely linked with EMT and CSCs.⁷ Therefore, these CaP-RR cells, representative of the source of CaP recurrence after RT, may provide a very good model to mimic a clinical radioresistance condition as well as to examine the efficacy of these single and dual PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibitors for their radiosensitization effects.Here, we investigated (1) whether cell cycle distribution, cell cycle check point proteins, apoptosis, autophagy and DNA repair pathways are involved in CaP radioresistance; (2) the link between radiosensitization effects and cell cycle distribution after treatment with a combination of dual inhibitors (BEZ235 and PI103) and single inhibitors (BKM120 and Rapamycin) with RT in CaP-RR cells in vitro; (3) whether cell death pathways (apoptosis and autophagy), DNA repair pathways (non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR)) are associated with CaP radiosensitivity after treatment with combination of dual or single inhibitors with RT.     

Synergistic anti-tumor activity and inhibition of angiogenesis by cotargeting of oncogenic and death receptor pathways in human melanoma

Improving treatment of advanced melanoma may require the development of effective strategies to overcome resistance to different anti-tumor agents and to counteract relevant pro-tumoral mechanisms in the microenvironment. Here we provide preclinical evidence that these goals can be achieved in most melanomas, by co-targeting of oncogenic and death receptor pathways, and independently of their BRAF, NRAS, p53 and PTEN status. In 49 melanoma cell lines, we found independent susceptibility profiles for response to the MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244, the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 and the death receptor ligand TRAIL, supporting the rationale for their association. Drug interaction analysis indicated that a strong synergistic anti-tumor activity could be achieved by the three agents and the AZD6244–TRAIL association on 20/21 melanomas, including cell lines resistant to the inhibitors or to TRAIL. Mechanistically, synergy was explained by enhanced induction of caspase-dependent apoptosis, mitochondrial depolarization and modulation of key regulators of extrinsic and intrinsic cell death pathways, including c-FLIP, BIM, BAX, clusterin, Mcl-1 and several IAP family members. Moreover, silencing experiments confirmed the central role of Apollon downmodulation in promoting the apoptotic response of melanoma cells to the combinatorial treatments. In SCID mice, the AZD6244–TRAIL association induced significant growth inhibition of a tumor resistant to TRAIL and poorly responsive to AZD6244, with no detectable adverse events on body weight and tissue histology. Reduction in tumor volume was associated not only with promotion of tumor apoptosis but also with suppression of the pro-angiogenic molecules HIF1α, VEGFα, IL-8 and TGFβ1 and with inhibition of tumor angiogenesis. These results suggest that synergistic co-targeting of oncogenic and death receptor pathways can not only overcome melanoma resistance to different anti-tumor agents in vitro but can also promote pro-apoptotic effects and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis in vivo.The development of mutant BRAF (v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B)- and mitogen/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK)-specific inhibitors, such as Vemurafenib, Dabrafenib and Trametinib, as well as of monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoints, has markedly improved the treatment of advanced melanoma, as shown by highly significant effects, achieved in several trials, on progression-free and/or overall survival.^{1, 2, 3, 4, 5} However, a fraction of patients does not benefit from target-specific therapy or immunotherapy, and duration of clinical responses may be limited.^{1, 2, 3, 4, 5} Mechanisms of resistance to specific inhibitors⁶ and of tumor escape from immune recognition⁷ contribute to prevent induction of melanoma cell death by the new therapies and explain the urgent need for the identification of more effective approaches. Different strategies are being investigated to overcome melanoma resistance to single anti-tumor agents and to rescue tumor susceptibility to cell death, including co-targeting of constitutively active intracellular signaling pathways,^{8, 9, 10} association of target-specific drugs with inhibitors of autophagy or with endoplasmic reticulum-stress inducers^11,12 and association of anti-tumor agents that trigger the extrinsic and the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis.^{13, 14, 15}The latter approach is based on the combination of specific inhibitors of main oncogenic pathways, which in different tumor types can modulate relevant pro- and anti-apoptotic molecules in the intrinsic pathway of cell death,^{16, 17, 18} with targeting of the extrinsic, death receptor-dependent pathway, by usage of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) or of agonistic death receptor 5 (DR5)-specific mAbs.¹⁹ Indeed, this approach has shown that association of MEK, pan-RAF or phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors with TRAIL can overcome resistance to TRAIL^{13, 14, 15} and can lead to enhanced melanoma apoptosis in vitro through different mechanisms, including upregulation of bcl-2-like protein 11 isoform 1 (Bim) and activation of BCL2-associated X protein (Bax).^{13, 14, 15} Moreover, as hypothesized recently by Geserick et al.,²⁰ the association of MEK or pan-RAF inhibitors with TRAIL could even be exploited as a potential approach to promote rapid elimination of most tumor cells, thus preventing the emergence of secondary resistance to BRAF inhibitors. Furthermore, the interest in the death receptor pathway, as a therapeutic target, has been recently strengthened by the evidence that TRAIL mediates disruption of the tumor-associated vasculature²¹ and by the discovery of TIC10, a drug that stimulates production of TRAIL and that exerts significant anti-tumor activities in preclinical in vivo models, including aggressive intracranial xenografts of human glioblastoma cells.²²Nevertheless, it is currently not known whether co-targeting of MEK and/or PI3K/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and of the death receptor pathway in melanoma can overcome intrinsic resistance to each of the anti-tumor agents in most instances, irrespective of the different genetic make-up of the tumors, and whether this approach can exert synergistic, rather than additive, anti-melanoma effects. Furthermore, it remains to be verified whether the combination of MEK or PI3K/mTOR inhibitors with death receptor agonists (such as TRAIL itself or DR5-specific mAbs) may also exert significant pro-apoptotic effects in vivo on melanoma xenografts and whether this is associated with inhibition of relevant pro-tumoral processes in the tumor microenvironment.To address these issues, in this study we evaluated the anti-melanoma activity in vitro and in vivo of two- or three-drug associations using TRAIL, the MEK 1/2 inhibitor AZD6244/Selumetinib, which has significant clinical activity in melanoma,²³ and the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235, currently in clinical trials in different solid tumors, including melanoma (source www.clinicaltrials.gov). The results indicated that the three-agent (AZD6244/BEZ235/TRAIL) and two-agent (AZD6244/TRAIL) combinations exerted synergistic pro-apoptotic effects on most melanomas in a large panel. These results were observed even on melanoma cell lines resistant to TRAIL or to the inhibitors and independently of their BRAF, neuroblastoma RAS viral (v-ras) oncogene homolog (NRAS), p53 and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) status. Moreover, an in vivo model showed that the AZD6244/TRAIL association promoted melanoma apoptosis associated with marked inhibition of angiogenesis.     

Effects of PI3K inhibitor NVP-BKM120 on overcoming drug resistance and eliminating cancer stem cells in human breast cancer cells

The multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype often accompanies activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway, which renders a survival signal to withstand cytotoxic anticancer drugs and enhances cancer stem cell (CSC) characteristics. As a result, PI3K/AKT-blocking approaches have been proposed as antineoplastic strategies, and inhibitors of PI3K/AKT are currently being trailed clinically in breast cancer patients. However, the effects of PI3K inhibitors on MDR breast cancers have not yet been elucidated. In the present study, the tumorigenic properties of three MDR breast cancer cell lines to a selective inhibitor of PI3K, NVP-BKM120 (BKM120), were assessed. We found that BKM120 showed a significant cytotoxic activity on MDR breast cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. When doxorubicin (DOX) was combined with BKM120, strong synergistic antiproliferative effect was observed. BKM120 activity induced the blockage of PI3K/AKT signaling and NF-κB expression, which in turn led to activate caspase-3/7 and caspase-9 and changed the expression of several apoptosis-related gene expression. Furthermore, BKM120 effectively eliminated CSC subpopulation and reduced sphere formation of these drug-resistant cells. Our findings indicate that BKM120 partially overcomes the MDR phenotype in chemoresistant breast cancer through cell apoptosis induction and CSC abolishing, which appears to be mediated by the inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/NF-κB axis. This offers a strong rationale to explore the therapeutic strategy of using BKM120 alone or in combination for chemotherapy-nonresponsive breast cancer patients.Multidrug resistance (MDR) remains a major cause for failure of chemotherapy-based treatment of breast cancer, in which cells become refractory to many structurally and functionally unrelated chemotherapeutic drugs.¹ Overexpression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family encoded by the mdr-1 gene, represents one of the principal mechanisms that contribute to the MDR phenotype.² However, many other mechanisms contribute simultaneously to the MDR phenotype, which may affect drug absorption, distribution and metabolism, thus modulating the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents consequently.^{3, 4} Growing evidence supports the notion that a subset of cancer cells, with self-renewal and differentiation features, are the cancer stem cells (CSCs) thought to be responsible for resistance to chemotherapy.⁵ CSCs seem to be protected against chemotherapeutic agents by means of different mechanisms, such as robust proficiency of DNA damage repair, overexpression of ABC transporters, abnormal activation of numerous signaling pathways, including phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT, Notch, Hedgehog and Wnt pathways.^{6, 7, 8} On the other hand, the CSC fraction is probably enriched after chemotherapy, as demonstrated by the increased expression of stemness markers in patients who are receiving primary systematic therapy.⁹The activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway is frequently implicated in resistance to anticancer therapies. Once activated, AKT can phosphorylate multiple substrates and downstream effectors, such as mTOR family, caspase family, cell cycle protein family and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), which contribute collectively to promote cell proliferation, survival, metastasis and chemoresistance.^{10, 11, 12} As this signaling cascade has a central role in human breast cancer, development of novel strategies to overcome resistance and eliminate CSC by targeting the PI3K/AKT pathway is apparently warranted.¹³NVP-BKM120 (referred hereafter as BKM120) is a potent and highly selective pan-class I PI3K inhibitor, which belongs to the 2,6-dimorpholino pyrimidine derivatives.¹⁴ It selectively inhibits wild type and mutant PI3K p110 α, β, δ, γ isoforms and exerts a strong antiproliferative effect to induce apoptosis in several cancers by specifically inhibiting the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.^{15, 16, 17} Phase I clinical trials show that overall BKM120 is well tolerated in several solid tumors, and Phase II clinical trials are ongoing.¹⁷ Several recent reports also emphasized the enhanced antitumor effects in mouse models when BKM120 was co-treated with inhibitors of other signaling pathways.^{18, 19, 20}In this study, we analyzed, for the first time, the efficacy of BKM120 in several MDR breast cancer cell lines with which the MDR phenotype is induced by different molecular mechanisms. BKM120 exerted potent efficacy of apoptosis promoting as well as CSCs eliminating through inhibiting the PI3K/AKT/NF-κB cascade in vitro and in vivo. In addition, BKM120 synergized with DOX, a common chemotherapeutic agent of breast cancer. Here we demonstrate the potential of BKM120 in overcoming chemotherapy resistance in breast cancer.     

The Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 axis affects spindle assembly checkpoint robustness and sensitivity to antimicrotubule cancer drugs

To grant faithful chromosome segregation, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit until mitotic spindle assembly. An exceedingly prolonged mitosis, however, promotes cell death and by this means antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs), that impair spindle assembly, are believed to kill cancer cells. Despite malformed spindles, cancer cells can, however, slip through SAC, exit mitosis prematurely and resist killing. We show here that the Fcp1 phosphatase and Wee1, the cyclin B-dependent kinase (cdk) 1 inhibitory kinase, play a role for this slippage/resistance mechanism. During AMCD-induced prolonged mitosis, Fcp1-dependent Wee1 reactivation lowered cdk1 activity, weakening SAC-dependent mitotic arrest and leading to mitosis exit and survival. Conversely, genetic or chemical Wee1 inhibition strengthened the SAC, further extended mitosis, reduced antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 to a minimum and potentiated killing in several, AMCD-treated cancer cell lines and primary human adult lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Thus, the Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 (FWC) axis affects SAC robustness and AMCDs sensitivity.The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit to coordinate anaphase onset with spindle assembly. To this end, SAC inhibits the ubiquitin ligase Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) to prevent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor securin and cyclin B, the major mitotic cyclin B-dependent kinase 1 (cdk1) activator, until spindle assembly.¹ However, by yet poorly understood mechanisms, exceedingly prolonging mitosis translates into cell death induction.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Although mechanistic details are still missing on how activation of cell death pathways is linked to mitosis duration, prolongation of mitosis appears crucial for the ability of antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs) to kill cancer cells.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} These drugs, targeting microtubules, impede mitotic spindle assembly and delay mitosis exit by chronically activating the SAC. Use of these drugs is limited, however, by toxicity and resistance. A major mechanism for resistance is believed to reside in the ability of cancer cells to slip through the SAC and exit mitosis prematurely despite malformed spindles, thus resisting killing by limiting mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Under the AMCD treatment, cells either die in mitosis or exit mitosis, slipping through the SAC, without or abnormally dividing.^{2, 3, 4} Cells that exit mitosis either die at later stages or survive and stop dividing or proliferate, giving rise to resistance.^{2, 3, 4} Apart from a role for p53, what dictates cell fate is still unknown; however, it appears that the longer mitosis is protracted, the higher the chances for cell death pathway activation are.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}Although SAC is not required per se for killing,⁶ preventing SAC adaptation should improve the efficacy of AMCD by increasing mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Therefore, further understanding of the mechanisms by which cells override SAC may help to improve the current AMCD therapy. Several kinases are known to activate and sustain SAC, and cdk1 itself appears to be of primary relevance.^{1, 8, 9} By studying mitosis exit and SAC resolution, we recently reported a role for the Fcp1 phosphatase to bring about cdk1 inactivation.^{10, 11} Among Fcp1 targets, we identified cyclin degradation pathway components, such as Cdc20, an APC/C co-activator, USP44, a deubiquitinating enzyme, and Wee1.^{10, 11} Wee1 is a crucial kinase that controls the G2 phase by performing inhibitory phosphorylation of cdk1 at tyr-15 (Y15-cdk1). Wee1 is also in a feedback relationship with cdk1 itself that, in turn, can phosphorylate and inhibit Wee1 in an autoamplification loop to promote the G2-to-M phase transition.¹² At mitosis exit, Fcp1 dephosphorylated Wee1 at threonine 239, a cdk1-dependent inhibitory phosphorylation, to dampen down the cdk1 autoamplification loop, and Cdc20 and USP44, to promote APC/C-dependent cyclin B degradation.^{10, 11, 12} In this study we analysed the Fcp1 relevance in SAC adaptation and AMCD sensitivity.     

A cellular screen identifies ponatinib and pazopanib as inhibitors of necroptosis

Necroptosis is a form of regulated necrotic cell death mediated by receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) and RIPK3. Necroptotic cell death contributes to the pathophysiology of several disorders involving tissue damage, including myocardial infarction, stroke and ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, no inhibitors of necroptosis are currently in clinical use. Here we performed a phenotypic screen for small-molecule inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)-induced necroptosis in Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD)-deficient Jurkat cells using a representative panel of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs. We identified two anti-cancer agents, ponatinib and pazopanib, as submicromolar inhibitors of necroptosis. Both compounds inhibited necroptotic cell death induced by various cell death receptor ligands in human cells, while not protecting from apoptosis. Ponatinib and pazopanib abrogated phosphorylation of mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) upon TNF-α-induced necroptosis, indicating that both agents target a component upstream of MLKL. An unbiased chemical proteomic approach determined the cellular target spectrum of ponatinib, revealing key members of the necroptosis signaling pathway. We validated RIPK1, RIPK3 and transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) as novel, direct targets of ponatinib by using competitive binding, cellular thermal shift and recombinant kinase assays. Ponatinib inhibited both RIPK1 and RIPK3, while pazopanib preferentially targeted RIPK1. The identification of the FDA-approved drugs ponatinib and pazopanib as cellular inhibitors of necroptosis highlights them as potentially interesting for the treatment of pathologies caused or aggravated by necroptotic cell death.Programmed cell death has a crucial role in a variety of biological processes ranging from normal tissue development to diverse pathological conditions.^{1, 2} Necroptosis is a form of regulated cell death that has been shown to occur during pathogen infection or sterile injury-induced inflammation in conditions where apoptosis signaling is compromised.^{3, 4, 5, 6} Given that many viruses have developed strategies to circumvent apoptotic cell death, necroptosis constitutes an important, pro-inflammatory back-up mechanism that limits viral spread in vivo.^{7, 8, 9} In contrast, in the context of sterile inflammation, necroptotic cell death contributes to disease pathology, outlining potential benefits of therapeutic intervention.¹⁰ Necroptosis can be initiated by death receptors of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily,¹¹ Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3),¹² TLR4,¹³ DNA-dependent activator of IFN-regulatory factors¹⁴ or interferon receptors.¹⁵ Downstream signaling is subsequently conveyed via RIPK1¹⁶ or TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β,^{8, 17} and converges on RIPK3-mediated^{13, 18, 19, 20} activation of MLKL.²¹ Phosphorylated MLKL triggers membrane rupture,^{22, 23, 24, 25, 26} releasing pro-inflammatory cellular contents to the extracellular space.²⁷ Studies using the RIPK1 inhibitor necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) ²⁸ or RIPK3-deficient mice have established a role for necroptosis in the pathophysiology of pancreatitis,¹⁹ artherosclerosis,²⁹ retinal cell death,³⁰ ischemic organ damage and ischemia-reperfusion injury in both the kidney³¹ and the heart.³² Moreover, allografts from RIPK3-deficient mice are better protected from rejection, suggesting necroptosis inhibition as a therapeutic option to improve transplant outcome.³³ Besides Nec-1, several tool compounds inhibiting different pathway members have been described,^{12, 16, 21, 34, 35} however, no inhibitors of necroptosis are available for clinical use so far.^{2, 10} In this study we screened a library of FDA approved drugs for the precise purpose of identifying already existing and generally safe chemical agents that could be used as necroptosis inhibitors. We identified the two structurally distinct kinase inhibitors pazopanib and ponatinib as potent blockers of necroptosis targeting the key enzymes RIPK1/3.     

IL10 inhibits starvation-induced autophagy in hypertrophic scar fibroblasts via cross talk between the IL10-IL10R-STAT3 and IL10-AKT-mTOR pathways

Hypertrophic scar (HS) is a serious skin fibrotic disease characterized by excessive hypercellularity and extracellular matrix (ECM) component deposition. Autophagy is a tightly regulated physiological process essential for cellular maintenance, differentiation, development, and homeostasis. Previous studies show that IL10 has potential therapeutic benefits in terms of preventing and reducing HS formation. However, no studies have examined IL10-mediated autophagy during the pathological process of HS formation. Here, we examined the effect of IL10 on starvation-induced autophagy and investigated the molecular mechanism underlying IL10-mediated inhibition of autophagy in HS-derived fibroblasts (HSFs) under starvation conditions. Immunostaining and PCR analysis revealed that a specific component of the IL10 receptor, IL10 alpha-chain (IL10Rα), is expressed in HSFs. Transmission electron microscopy and western blot analysis revealed that IL10 inhibited starvation-induced autophagy and induced the expression of p-AKT and p-STAT3 in HSFs in a dose-dependent manner. Blocking IL10R, p-AKT, p-mTOR, and p-STAT3 using specific inhibitors (IL10RB, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"LY294002","term_id":"1257998346","term_text":"LY294002"}}LY294002, rapamycin, and cryptotanshinone, respectively) showed that IL10 inhibited autophagy via IL10Rα-mediated activation of STAT3 (the IL10R-STAT3 pathway) and by directly activating the AKT-mTOR pathway. Notably, these results suggest that IL10-mediated inhibition of autophagy is facilitated by the cross talk between STAT3, AKT, and mTOR; in other words, the IL10-IL10R-STAT3 and IL10-AKT-mTOR pathways. Finally, the results also indicate that mTOR-p70S6K is the molecule upon which these two pathways converge to induce IL10-mediated inhibition of autophagy in starved HSFs. In summary, the findings reported herein shed light on the molecular mechanism underlying IL10-mediated inhibition of autophagy and suggest that IL10 is a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of HS.Autophagy is a degradative process in eukaryotic cells that removes or turns over bulk cytoplasmic constituents through the endosomal and lysosomal fusion system (i.e., autophagosomes).^{1, 2} Autophagy is induced by stressful conditions such as starvation and pathogenic invasion.²Hypertrophic scar (HS) is a major skin fibrotic disorder caused by hypercellularity and extracellular matrix (ECM) component deposition.^{3, 4, 5} HS formation is usually recognized as the consequence of disturbed tissue repair processes and/or disrupted homeostasis in the skin after traumatic injury: HS negatively impacts on patient appearance, skeletal muscle function, and quality of life in general.^{6, 7, 8, 9} About 40–70% of surgeries and over 91% of burn injuries result in HS.¹⁰ A key feature of HS is a metabolic disorder of collagen-based ECM proteins.^{11, 12, 13} Autophagy has an important role in homeostasis of tissue structure and function.^{2, 14, 15} Skin autophagic capability is associated with HS and with the pathogenesis of many human diseases.^{16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23}Existing studies suggest that cytokines are important regulators of the autophagic process in both immune and non-immune cells.^{24, 25, 26} Interleukin-10 (IL10), expressed by a variety of mammalian cell types, was first described as a cytokine-synthesis-inhibitory factor with immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory functions.^{27, 28} IL10 has a pivotal role in wound healing^{29, 30} and is a promising therapeutic agent for scar improvement in both animal models and human cutaneous wounds.^{9, 31, 32}Fibroblasts are one of the most important effector cells responsible for HS formation.^{12, 33, 34} Thus, we were prompted to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the interactions among IL10, autophagy, and HS formation, with the aim of providing a molecular foundation for the therapeutic efficacy IL10. We used HS tissue, HS-derived fibroblasts (HSFs), and starvation-induced autophagy in HSFs as our research platform.Here, we report that IL10 inhibited autophagy by interfering with IL10R-mediated activation of IL10R-STAT3, as well as by activating the AKT-mTOR pathway. In addition, cross talk among STAT3, AKT, and mTOR and between the IL10-IL10R-STAT3 and IL10-AKT-mTOR pathways collaboratively regulated starvation-induced autophagy in HSFs.     

Rapamycin-enhanced mitomycin C-induced apoptotic death is mediated through the S6K1–Bad–Bak pathway in peritoneal carcinomatosis

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is the most common secondary cancerous disease, and more effective novel regimens are needed. In this study, we identified a novel combination treatment for PC, chemotherapeutic agent mitomycin C in combination with mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitor rapamycin. We observed that the combination of mitomycin C and rapamycin induced synergistic cytotoxicity and apoptosis, which was mediated through an increase in caspase activation. The combination of mitomycin C and rapamycin inactivated p70 S6 ribosomal kinase (S6K1) and dephosphorylated Bad, leading to dissociation of Bcl-xL from Bak, which resulted in Bak oligomerization, mitochondria dysfunction and cytochrome c release. PF-4708671, a S6K1-specific inhibitor, enhanced the combination treatment-induced apoptosis, whereas S6K1 E389 DeltaCT-HA (S6K1 active form) dramatically decreased the induction of apoptosis. In addition, the combination treatment significantly inhibited LS174T intraperitoneal tumor growth in vivo. This study provides a preclinical rationale for apoptosis induction linked with the mTOR pathway through a combination of chemotherapeutic agents and mTOR inhibitor, and will support this combinatorial strategy to PC patients.Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is the most common secondary cancerous disease to affect the peritoneal cavity following colorectal cancer, appendiceal cancer, ovarian cancer, gastric cancer, or diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, and is regarded as a lethal condition having poor prognosis with a median survival of ∼6 months.^{1, 2} Systemic chemotherapy prolongs survival in PC patients, but is less effective than for patients with hepatic metastasis; thus, an increasing number of patients are treated with cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC).³ Nevertheless, more effective novel regimens are still needed to improve the survival of PC patients.Mitomycin C, a potent DNA crosslinker, was used as an anticancer drug and led to pronounced induction of apoptosis, especially through the mitochondrial-dependent pathway.^{4, 5} It has received a great number of preclinical and clinical studies and is mostly widely used for PC.⁶ Combination of cytotoxic drugs, such as mitomycin C with novel biological agents, has achieved improvement in animal models and provides additional survival benefits for patients.^{7, 8, 9}mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin), a serine/threonine kinase, is ubiquitously involved in cell growth and proliferation. The fact that hyperactivation of mTOR is a common feature of human cancers makes it an attractive target in cancer therapy.¹⁰ It has been reported that some agents inactivate mTOR signaling as an early response prior to the execution of apoptosis.^{11, 12} Recently, it has been found that mTOR can directly control mitochondrial function,¹³ which raises the possibility that targeting mTOR may regulate the apoptotic pathway. Sirolimus, known as rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor, potently inhibits S6K1 (S6 ribosomal kinase) activity¹⁴ and has been generally well tolerated in clinical trials, often inducing prolonged stable disease or tumor regression, and can be considered as an option for combination with other anticancer agents.^{15, 16}In this study we observed that the combination of chemotherapy agent mitomycin C and mTOR inhibitor rapamycin induced synergistic cytotoxicity and apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. The combination of mitomycin C and rapamycin inactivated S6K1, not Akt, and resulted in dephosphorylation of Bad, which inactivated its pro-apoptotic function, inducing Bak oligomerization and mitochondrial-dependent apoptotic cell death.     

p62/SQSTM1 upregulation constitutes a survival mechanism that occurs during granulocytic differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia cells

The p62/SQSTM1 adapter protein has an important role in the regulation of several key signaling pathways and helps transport ubiquitinated proteins to the autophagosomes and proteasome for degradation. Here, we investigate the regulation and roles of p62/SQSTM1 during acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell maturation into granulocytes. Levels of p62/SQSTM1 mRNA and protein were both significantly increased during all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA)-induced differentiation of AML cells through a mechanism that depends on NF-κB activation. We show that this response constitutes a survival mechanism that prolongs the life span of mature AML cells and mitigates the effects of accumulation of aggregated proteins that occurs during granulocytic differentiation. Interestingly, ATRA-induced p62/SQSTM1 upregulation was impaired in maturation-resistant AML cells but was reactivated when differentiation was restored in these cells. Primary blast cells of AML patients and CD34⁺ progenitors exhibited significantly lower p62/SQSTM1 mRNA levels than did mature granulocytes from healthy donors. Our results demonstrate that p62/SQSTM1 expression is upregulated in mature compared with immature myeloid cells and reveal a pro-survival function of the NF-κB/SQSTM1 signaling axis during granulocytic differentiation of AML cells. These findings may help our understanding of neutrophil/granulocyte development and will guide the development of novel therapeutic strategies for refractory and relapsed AML patients with previous exposure to ATRA.p62 or sequestosome 1 (p62/SQSTM1) is a scaffold protein, implicated in a variety of biological processes including those that control cell death, inflammation, and metabolism.^{1, 2} Through its multi-domain structure, p62/SQSTM1 interacts specifically with key signaling proteins, including atypical PKC family members, NF-κB, and mTOR to control cellular responses.^{3, 4, 5, 6, 7} p62/SQSTM1 functions also as a key mediator of autophagy. Through its interaction with LC3, an essential protein involved in autophagy, p62/SQSTM1 selectively directs ubiquitinated substrates to autophagosomes leading to their subsequent degradation in lysosomes.^{8, 9} At the molecular level, p62/SQSTM1 acts as a pro-tumoral molecule by ensuring efficient and selective activation of cell signaling axes involved in cell survival, proliferation, and metabolism (i.e., NF-κB, mTOR, and Nrf-2 pathways).^{3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13} p62/SQSTM1 can also signal anti-tumoral responses either by inactivating the pro-oncogenic signaling through BCR-ABL¹⁴ and Wnt pathways^{15, 16} or by inducing the activation of caspase 8, a pro-death protein.^{17, 18} Interestingly, in response to stress, autophagy promotes the degradation of p62, thus limits the activation of p62-regulatory pathways that control tumorigenesis.¹⁰ In addition, p62/SQSTM1 controls pathways that modulate differentiation of normal and cancerous cells. For example, p62/SQSTM1 has been shown to antagonize basal ERK activity and adipocyte differentiation.¹⁹ In contrast, p62/SQSTM1 favors differentiation of osteoclasts,²⁰ osteoblasts,²¹ neurons,²² megakaryocytes²³ and macrophages.²⁴ The role and regulation of p62/SQSTM1 during leukemia cell differentiation has been poorly documented.Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological disease characterized by multiple deregulated pathways resulting in a blockade of myeloid precursors at different stages of maturation.^{25, 26} Acute promyelocyte leukemia (APL) is the M3 type of AML characterized by an arrest of the terminal differentiation of promyelocytes into granulocytes and frequently associated with the expression of the oncogenic PML-RAR alpha fusion gene.^{27, 28} All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), a potent activator of cellular growth arrest, differentiation, and death of APL cells, has been shown to effectively promote complete clinical remission of APL when combined with chemotherapy.^{29, 30, 31} Despite the success of this treatment, some APL patients are refractory to ATRA treatment or relapse owing to the development of resistance to ATRA in leukemia cells.^{32, 33, 34}Our previous results revealed that autophagy flux is activated during granulocyte differentiation of myeloid leukemia cell lines induced by ATRA.³⁵ In the present study, we observed that p62/SQSTM1, an autophagic substrate, is markedly upregulated at both mRNA and protein levels during the granulocytic differentiation process. Here, we investigated the regulation and the function of p62/SQSTM1 during AML cells differentiation into neutrophils/granulocytes.     

TRAF2 is a biologically important necroptosis suppressor

Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) triggers necroptotic cell death through an intracellular signaling complex containing receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIPK) 1 and RIPK3, called the necrosome. RIPK1 phosphorylates RIPK3, which phosphorylates the pseudokinase mixed lineage kinase-domain-like (MLKL)—driving its oligomerization and membrane-disrupting necroptotic activity. Here, we show that TNF receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2)—previously implicated in apoptosis suppression—also inhibits necroptotic signaling by TNFα. TRAF2 disruption in mouse fibroblasts augmented TNFα–driven necrosome formation and RIPK3-MLKL association, promoting necroptosis. TRAF2 constitutively associated with MLKL, whereas TNFα reversed this via cylindromatosis-dependent TRAF2 deubiquitination. Ectopic interaction of TRAF2 and MLKL required the C-terminal portion but not the N-terminal, RING, or CIM region of TRAF2. Induced TRAF2 knockout (KO) in adult mice caused rapid lethality, in conjunction with increased hepatic necrosome assembly. By contrast, TRAF2 KO on a RIPK3 KO background caused delayed mortality, in concert with elevated intestinal caspase-8 protein and activity. Combined injection of TNFR1-Fc, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc decoys prevented death upon TRAF2 KO. However, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc were ineffective, whereas TNFR1-Fc and interferon α receptor (IFNAR1)-Fc were partially protective against lethality upon combined TRAF2 and RIPK3 KO. These results identify TRAF2 as an important biological suppressor of necroptosis in vitro and in vivo.Apoptotic cell death is mediated by caspases and has distinct morphological features, including membrane blebbing, cell shrinkage and nuclear fragmentation.^{1, 2, 3, 4} In contrast, necroptotic cell death is caspase-independent and is characterized by loss of membrane integrity, cell swelling and implosion.^{1, 2, 5} Nevertheless, necroptosis is a highly regulated process, requiring activation of RIPK1 and RIPK3, which form the core necrosome complex.^{1, 2, 5} Necrosome assembly can be induced via specific death receptors or toll-like receptors, among other modules.^{6, 7, 8, 9} The activated necrosome engages MLKL by RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation.^{6, 10, 11} MLKL then oligomerizes and binds to membrane phospholipids, forming pores that cause necroptotic cell death.^{10, 12, 13, 14, 15} Unchecked necroptosis disrupts embryonic development in mice and contributes to several human diseases.^{7, 8, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22}The apoptotic mediators FADD, caspase-8 and cFLIP suppress necroptosis.^{19, 20, 21, 23, 24} Elimination of any of these genes in mice causes embryonic lethality, subverted by additional deletion of RIPK3 or MLKL.^{19, 20, 21, 25} Necroptosis is also regulated at the level of RIPK1. Whereas TNFα engagement of TNFR1 leads to K63-linked ubiquitination of RIPK1 by cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (cIAPs) to promote nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation,²⁶ necroptosis requires suppression or reversal of this modification to allow RIPK1 autophosphorylation and consequent RIPK3 activation.^{2, 23, 27, 28} CYLD promotes necroptotic signaling by deubiquitinating RIPK1, augmenting its interaction with RIPK3.²⁹ Conversely, caspase-8-mediated CYLD cleavage inhibits necroptosis.²⁴TRAF2 recruits cIAPs to the TNFα-TNFR1 signaling complex, facilitating NF-κB activation.^{30, 31, 32, 33} TRAF2 also supports K48-linked ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of death-receptor-activated caspase-8, curbing apoptosis.³⁴ TRAF2 KO mice display embryonic lethality; some survive through birth but have severe developmental and immune deficiencies and die prematurely.^{35, 36} Conditional TRAF2 KO leads to rapid intestinal inflammation and mortality.³⁷ Furthermore, hepatic TRAF2 depletion augments apoptosis activation via Fas/CD95.³⁴ TRAF2 attenuates necroptosis induction in vitro by the death ligands Apo2L/TRAIL and Fas/CD95L.³⁸ However, it remains unclear whether TRAF2 regulates TNFα-induced necroptosis—and if so—how. Our present findings reveal that TRAF2 inhibits TNFα necroptotic signaling. Furthermore, our results establish TRAF2 as a biologically important necroptosis suppressor in vitro and in vivo and provide initial insight into the mechanisms underlying this function.     

Calcineurin B-Like Protein-Interacting Protein Kinase CIPK21 Regulates Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses in Arabidopsis

The role of calcium-mediated signaling has been extensively studied in plant responses to abiotic stress signals. Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) constitute a complex signaling network acting in diverse plant stress responses. Osmotic stress imposed by soil salinity and drought is a major abiotic stress that impedes plant growth and development and involves calcium-signaling processes. In this study, we report the functional analysis of CIPK21, an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CBL-interacting protein kinase, ubiquitously expressed in plant tissues and up-regulated under multiple abiotic stress conditions. The growth of a loss-of-function mutant of CIPK21, cipk21, was hypersensitive to high salt and osmotic stress conditions. The calcium sensors CBL2 and CBL3 were found to physically interact with CIPK21 and target this kinase to the tonoplast. Moreover, preferential localization of CIPK21 to the tonoplast was detected under salt stress condition when coexpressed with CBL2 or CBL3. These findings suggest that CIPK21 mediates responses to salt stress condition in Arabidopsis, at least in part, by regulating ion and water homeostasis across the vacuolar membranes.Drought and salinity cause osmotic stress in plants and severely affect crop productivity throughout the world. Plants respond to osmotic stress by changing a number of cellular processes (Xiong et al., 1999; Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Boudsocq and Lauriére, 2005). Some of these changes include activation of stress-responsive genes, regulation of membrane transport at both plasma membrane (PM) and vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) to maintain water and ionic homeostasis, and metabolic changes to produce compatible osmolytes such as Pro (Stewart and Lee, 1974; Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). It has been well established that a specific calcium (Ca²⁺) signature is generated in response to a particular environmental stimulus (Trewavas and Malhó, 1998; Scrase-Field and Knight, 2003; Luan, 2009; Kudla et al., 2010). The Ca²⁺ changes are primarily perceived by several Ca²⁺ sensors such as calmodulin (Reddy, 2001; Luan et al., 2002), Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinases (Harper and Harmon, 2005), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Pandey, 2008; Luan, 2009; Sanyal et al., 2015), and other Ca²⁺-binding proteins (Reddy, 2001; Shao et al., 2008) to initiate various cellular responses.Plant CBL-type Ca²⁺ sensors interact with and activate CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) that phosphorylate downstream components to transduce Ca²⁺ signals (Liu et al., 2000; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Luan, 2009). In several plant species, multiple members have been identified in the CBL and CIPK family (Luan et al., 2002; Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Pandey, 2008; Batistič and Kudla, 2009; Weinl and Kudla, 2009; Pandey et al., 2014). Involvement of specific CBL-CIPK pair to decode a particular type of signal entails the alternative and selective complex formation leading to stimulus-response coupling (D’Angelo et al., 2006; Batistič et al., 2010).Several CBL and CIPK family members have been implicated in plant responses to drought, salinity, and osmotic stress based on genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants (Zhu, 2002; Cheong et al., 2003, 2007; Kim et al., 2003; Pandey et al., 2004, 2008; D’Angelo et al., 2006; Qin et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Held et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2012; Drerup et al., 2013; Eckert et al., 2014). A few CIPKs have also been functionally characterized by gain-of-function approach in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), and maize (Zea mays) and were found to be involved in osmotic stress responses (Mahajan et al., 2006; Xiang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009; Cuéllar et al., 2010).In this report, we examined the role of the Arabidopsis CIPK21 gene in osmotic stress response by reverse genetic analysis. The loss-of-function mutant plants became hypersensitive to salt and mannitol stress conditions, suggesting that CIPK21 is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress response in Arabidopsis. These findings are further supported by an enhanced tonoplast targeting of the cytoplasmic CIPK21 through interaction with the vacuolar Ca²⁺ sensors CBL2 and CBL3 under salt stress condition.     

Distinct roles of RIP1–RIP3 hetero- and RIP3–RIP3 homo-interaction in mediating necroptosis

Necroptosis is mediated by a signaling complex called necrosome, containing receptor-interacting protein (RIP)1, RIP3, and mixed-lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL). It is known that RIP1 and RIP3 form heterodimeric filamentous scaffold in necrosomes through their RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM) domain-mediated oligomerization, but the signaling events based on this scaffold has not been fully addressed. By using inducible dimer systems we found that RIP1–RIP1 interaction is dispensable for necroptosis; RIP1–RIP3 interaction is required for necroptosis signaling, but there is no necroptosis if no additional RIP3 protein is recruited to the RIP1–RIP3 heterodimer, and the interaction with RIP1 promotes the RIP3 to recruit other RIP3; RIP3–RIP3 interaction is required for necroptosis and RIP3–RIP3 dimerization is sufficient to induce necroptosis; and RIP3 dimer-induced necroptosis requires MLKL. We further show that RIP3 oligomer is not more potent than RIP3 dimer in triggering necroptosis, suggesting that RIP3 homo-interaction in the complex, rather than whether RIP3 has formed homo polymer, is important for necroptosis. RIP3 dimerization leads to RIP3 intramolecule autophosphorylation, which is required for the recruitment of MLKL. Interestingly, phosphorylation of one of RIP3 in the dimer is sufficient to induce necroptosis. As RIP1–RIP3 heterodimer itself cannot induce necroptosis, the RIP1–RIP3 heterodimeric amyloid fibril is unlikely to directly propagate necroptosis. We propose that the signaling events after the RIP1–RIP3 amyloid complex assembly are the recruitment of free RIP3 by the RIP3 in the amyloid scaffold followed by autophosphorylation of RIP3 and subsequent recruitment of MLKL by RIP3 to execute necroptosis.Necroptosis is a type of programmed necrosis characterized by necrotic morphological changes, including cellular organelle swelling, cell membrane rupture,^{1, 2, 3} and dependence of receptor-interacting protein (RIP)1⁴ and RIP3.^{5, 6, 7} Physiological function of necroptosis has been illustrated in host defense,^{8, 9, 10, 11} inflammation,^{12, 13, 14, 15, 16} tissue injury,^{10, 17, 18} and development.^{19, 20, 21}Necroptosis can be induced by a number of different extracellular stimuli such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF). TNF stimulation leads to formation of TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) signaling complex (named complex I), and complex II containing RIP1, TRADD, FAS-associated protein with a death domain (FADD), and caspase-8, of which the activation initiates apoptosis. If cells have high level of RIP3, RIP1 recruits RIP3 to form necrosome containing FADD,^{22, 23, 24} caspase-8, RIP1, and RIP3, and the cells undergo necroptosis.^{25, 26} Caspase-8 and FADD negatively regulates necroptosis,^{27, 28, 29, 30} because RIP1, RIP3, and CYLD are potential substrates of caspase-8.^{31, 32, 33, 34} Necrosome also suppresses apoptosis but the underlying mechanism has not been described yet. Mixed-lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL) is downstream of RIP3,^{35, 36} and phosphorylation of MLKL is required for necroptosis.^{37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42}Apoptosis inducing complex (complex II) and necrosome are both supramolecular complexes.^{43, 44, 45} A recent study showed that RIP1 and RIP3 form amyloidal fibrils through their RIP homotypic interaction motif⁴⁶ (RHIM)-mediated polymerization, and suggested that amyloidal structure is essential for necroptosis signaling.⁴⁷ The RIP1–RIP3 heterodimeric amyloid complex is believed to function as a scaffold that brings signaling proteins into proximity to permit their activation. However, RIP1 and RIP3 also can each form fibrils on their own RHIM domains in vitro. It is unclear how the homo- and hetero-interactions are coordinated and organized on the amyloid scaffold to execute their functions in necroptosis. Here, we used inducible dimerization systems to study the roles of RIP1–RIP1, RIP1–RIP3, and RIP3–RIP3 interactions in necroptosis signaling. Our data suggested that it is the RIP1–RIP3 interaction in the RIP1–RIP3 heterodimeric amyloid complex that empowers to recruit other free RIP3; homodimerization of RIP3 triggers its autophosphorylation and only the phosphorylated RIP3 can recruit MLKL to execute necroptosis.