SPP1, SERPINB11, SERPINB13
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Geetika Sethi Harsh B. Pathak Hong Zhang Yan Zhou Margret B. Einarson Vinod Vathipadiekal Sumedha Gunewardena Michael J. Birrer Andrew K. Godwin 《PloS one》2012,7(10)
Targeted therapies have been used to combat many tumor types; however, few have effectively improved the overall survival in women with epithelial ovarian cancer, begging for a better understanding of this deadly disease and identification of essential drivers of tumorigenesis that can be targeted effectively. Therefore, we used a loss-of-function screening approach to help identify molecular vulnerabilities that may represent key points of therapeutic intervention. We employed an unbiased high-throughput lethality screen using a 24,088 siRNA library targeting over 6,000 druggable genes and studied their effects on growth and/or survival of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cell lines. The top 300 “hits” affecting the viability of A1847 cells were rescreened across additional EOC cell lines and non-tumorigenic, human immortalized ovarian epithelial cell lines. Fifty-three gene candidates were found to exhibit effects in all tumorigenic cell lines tested. Extensive validation of these hits refined the list to four high quality candidates (HSPA5, NDC80, NUF2, and PTN). Mechanistic studies show that silencing of three genes leads to increased apoptosis, while HSPA5 silencing appears to alter cell growth through G1 cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, two independent gene expression studies show that NDC80, NUF2 and PTN were significantly aberrantly overexpressed in serous adenocarcinomas. Overall, our functional genomics results integrated with the genomics data provide an important unbiased avenue towards the identification of prospective therapeutic targets for drug discovery, which is an urgent and unmet clinical need for ovarian cancer. 相似文献
2.
David E. Gordon Lisa M. Bond Daniela A. Sahlender Andrew A. Peden 《Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark)》2010,11(9):1191-1204
The role of SNAREs in mammalian constitutive secretion remains poorly defined. To address this, we have developed a novel flow cytometry‐based assay for measuring constitutive secretion and have performed a targeted SNARE and Sec1/Munc18 (SM) protein‐specific siRNA screen (38 SNAREs, 4 SNARE‐like proteins and 7 SM proteins). We have identified the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)/Golgi SNAREs syntaxin 5, syntaxin 17, syntaxin 18, GS27, SLT1, Sec20, Sec22b, Ykt6 and the SM protein Sly1, along with the post‐Golgi SNAREs SNAP‐29 and syntaxin 19, as being required for constitutive secretion. Depletion of SNAP‐29 or syntaxin 19 causes a decrease in the number of fusion events at the cell surface and in SNAP‐29‐depleted cells causes an increase in the number of docked vesicles at the plasma membrane as determined by total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. Analysis of syntaxin 19‐interacting partners by mass spectrometry indicates that syntaxin 19 can form SNARE complexes with SNAP‐23, SNAP‐25, SNAP‐29, VAMP3 and VAMP8, supporting its role in Golgi to plasma membrane transport or fusion. Surprisingly, we have failed to detect any requirement for a post‐Golgi‐specific R‐SNARE in this process. 相似文献
3.
4.
BackgroundChemotherapy resistance is reported to correlate with up-regulation of anti-tumor agent transporter ABCB1 (p-gp) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), but the results remain controversial. To reconcile the results, a systematic review followed by meta-analysis was performed to assess the association between high ABCB1 status or ABCB1 gene variants and overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and total response rate (TR) in patients with EOC.ResultsThirty-eight retrospective studies of 8607 cases qualified for meta-analysis were identified. Our results suggested that ABCB1 over-expression was significantly associated with unfavorable OS (HR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.25–1.90), PFS (HR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.22–1.82) and TR (RR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54–0.75). After adjustment for age, clinical stage, residual disease, histological type and tumor grade, high ABCB1 status remained to be a significant risk factor for adverse OS and PFS. Patients with recurrent ABCB1 positivity suffered from poorer OS than those with primary ABCB1 positivity. However, stratified by chemotherapy regimen, inverse correlation between high ABCB1 status and poor OS, PFS and TR were only found in patients underwent platinum-based chemotherapy but not in patients received standard platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. No evidence was found for any association between ABCB1 gene polymorphisms and OS, PFS or TR.ConclusionHigh ABCB1 status is significantly associated with chemo-resistance and poor prognosis in patients with EOC. Large-scale, prospective studies are needed to assess the clinical value of ABCB1 expression in EOC more accurately. 相似文献
5.
Arturo B. Ramirez Christian M. Loch Yuzheng Zhang Yan Liu Xiaohong Wang Elizabeth A. Wayner Jonathon E. Sargent Sahar Sibani Eugenie Hainsworth Eliseo A. Mendoza Ralph Eugene Joshua LaBaer Nicole D. Urban Martin W. McIntosh Paul D. Lampe 《Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP》2010,9(7):1449-1460
The discovery of novel early detection biomarkers of disease could offer one of the best approaches to decrease the morbidity and mortality of ovarian and other cancers. We report on the use of a single-chain variable fragment antibody library for screening ovarian serum to find novel biomarkers for the detection of cancer. We alternately panned the library with ovarian cancer and disease-free control sera to make a sublibrary of antibodies that bind proteins differentially expressed in cancer. This sublibrary was printed on antibody microarrays that were incubated with labeled serum from multiple sets of cancer patients and controls. The antibodies that performed best at discriminating disease status were selected, and their cognate antigens were identified using a functional protein microarray. Overexpression of some of these antigens was observed in cancer serum, tumor proximal fluid, and cancer tissue via dot blot and immunohistochemical staining. Thus, our use of recombinant antibody microarrays for unbiased discovery found targets for ovarian cancer detection in multiple sample sets, supporting their further study for disease diagnosis.Despite many advances in the treatment of cancer, early detection and tumor removal remains the best prospect for overcoming disease. Ovarian cancer is an excellent example of the potential prognostic value of early detection because diagnosis at a localized stage has a 5-year survival rate of 93%. However, only 19% of cases are diagnosed at this stage, and by the time the disease has evolved to an advanced stage, the 5-year survival rate drops to 31% (1).Much effort has been expended to find early detection markers of ovarian cancer, and some success has been achieved. Most notable is CA125, the only approved marker for the detection of recurrence of ovarian cancer (2). Other leading targets are mesothelin and HE4, which have been examined by several groups for their efficacy as early detection markers (3–8). Nevertheless, several conditions necessitate the discovery of more specific and sensitive ovarian cancer markers: the heterogeneity of this disease, the ambiguity of its symptoms, its low incidence in the general population, and the low sensitivity and specificity of currently available markers.One of the difficulties in finding markers in blood is the complexity of the plasma/serum proteome, estimated in the tens to hundreds of thousands of proteins, as well as its large range in constituent protein concentrations, which can span 12 orders of magnitude (9). However, along with its easy accessibility, the fact that blood is in contact with virtually every tissue and contains tissue- and tumor-derived proteins makes it a preferred source for disease biomarker discovery.Our previous results (10, 11) and those of others (12–14) using high density, full-length IgG antibody microarrays to validate and discover cancer serum biomarkers demonstrated that this platform is valuable for simultaneously comparing the levels of hundreds of proteins on dozens of serum samples from cancer patients and healthy controls. We confirmed overexpression of CA125, mesothelin, and HE4 in ovarian cancer samples using this high density microarray platform, validating our array methodology for measurement of cancer serum biomarkers and yielding new putative biomarkers for this disease (10, 11).Previously reported approaches are typically limited to a few hundred antibodies. The methodology reported here allows us to exploit the specific advantages of antibodies as high affinity capture reagents to detect differential expression of thousands of tumor biomarkers using a diverse (2 × 108 binding agents) single-chain variable fragment antibody (scFv)1 library for detection of ovarian cancer markers in serum, tumor cyst fluid, and ascites fluid. Our results build on previous reports of phage display library microarrays to discover autoantibody (15–18) and other protein (12, 19, 20) cancer biomarkers. Our scFv are high affinity capture reagents consisting of the variable regions of human antibody heavy and light chains joined by a flexible linker peptide. These recombinant antibodies are able to recognize a wide variety of antigens, including many previously thought difficult, such as self-antigens and proteins that are not normally immunogenic in animals (21–24). Using a highly diverse recombinant antibody library, one has the ability to overcome the complexity of the serum proteome. It has been calculated that for an immune repertoire to be complete (at least one antibody in the repertoire has reasonable affinity for every epitope possible in nature) it requires a diversity of at least 106 antibodies (25). The reported diversity of our scFv library exceeds this value by 100-fold (21).To enrich for antibodies that differentiate disease status, we performed a selection or panning of the naïve library for proteins that are differentially expressed in cyst fluid, ascites fluid, or serum of cancer patients with respect to healthy serum. We printed this sublibrary on activated hydrogel slides that were queried with three different sets of labeled case and control sera to further select those that discriminate cancer status in a statistically significant manner. Next, we identified some of the targets that bind to the individual scFv using high density nucleic acid programmable protein arrays (NAPPAs) expressing a total of over 7000 proteins. Finally, we validated the effectiveness of the selection process by confirming overexpression of these targets in cancer serum, cyst fluid, and ascites fluid as well as in tumor sections. 相似文献
6.
Purab Pal Kara Nicole Starkweather Karen Held Hales Dale Buchanan Hales 《Comparative medicine》2021,71(4):271
Often referred to as the silent killer, ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. This disease rarely shows any physical symptoms until late stages and no known biomarkers are available for early detection. Because ovarian cancer is rarely detected early, the physiology behind the initiation, progression, treatment, and prevention of this disease remains largely unclear. Over the past 2 decades, the laying hen has emerged as a model that naturally develops epithelial ovarian cancer that is both pathologically and histologically similar to that of the human form of the disease. Different molecular signatures found in human ovarian cancer have also been identified in chicken ovarian cancer including increased CA125 and elevated E-cadherin expression, among others. Chemoprevention studies conducted in this model have shown that decreased ovulation and inflammation are associated with decreased incidence of ovarian cancer development. The purpose of this article is to review the major studies performed in laying hen model of ovarian cancer and discuss how these studies shape our current understanding of the pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among female gynecologic malignancies, with a 47% 5 y relative survival rate.154 Early detection of the disease is necessary for decreasing the high mortality rate. However, early detection is difficult due to the lack of known specific biomarkers and clinically detectable symptoms until the tumor reaches at an advanced stage. The disease has multiple subtypes. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most common type of ovarian cancer, accounting for about 90% of all reported cases.127,164 EOC is commonly subdivided into 5 histotypes: high-grade serous (HGSOC), low-grade serous, mucinous, endometroid (EC), and clear cell. The histotypes differ in terms of tumor cell morphology, severity, systemic effect, and response to treatment. Among the different subtypes, HGSOC accounts for about 70% of cases of EOC observed in women. HGSOC has a higher mitotic index and is a more aggressive form of cancer with a worse prognosis. HGSOC and low-grade serous histotypes exhibit distinctly different presentations of the disease82,166 and demand different treatment modalities. EC (10% to 20%), mucinous (5% to 20%), and clear cell (3% to 10%) histotypes are less common forms of the disease. The subtypes of EOC also differ in terms of 5 y survival rates of patients; that is, HGSOC (20% to 35%), EC (40% to 63%), mucinous (40% to 69%), and clear cell (35% to 50%).20,76,148Developing a representative animal model for EOC has been challenging due to the histologic and pathologic differences among different subtypes of EOC. While developing a reliable animal model is challenging due to the vast complexity and limited understanding of the origin of the disease, laying hens naturally develop EOC that is histopathologically very similar to the human form of the disease (Figure 1).15 All the different human ovarian cancer histotypes have been observed in laying hen ovarian cancer (Figure 2). In addition, the presentation of the disease in chickens is remarkably similar to the human form of the disease, with early-stage ovarian cancer in laying hens having similar precursor lesions as occur in women.15 The laying hen develops ovarian cancer spontaneously, allowing analysis of early events and investigation into the natural course of the disease, as tumors can be examined as they progress from normal to late-stage ovarian carcinoma. The gross appearance of these stages is shown in Figure 3.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Gross pathologic presentation of chicken compared with human ovarian cancer. The remarkably similar presentation in hens (A,B) and women (C,D) at the gross anatomic level with profuse abdominal ascites and peritoneal dissemination of metastasis. A) Ascites in abdominal cavity chicken with advanced ovarian cancer (photo credit: DB Hales); (B) Chicken ovarian cancer with extensive peritoneal dissemination of metastasis (photo credit: DB Hales); (C) Distended abdomen from ascites fluid accumulation in woman with ovarian cancer (http://www.pathguy.com/bryanlee/ovca.html) (D) Human ovarian cancer with extensive peritoneal dissemination of metastasis (http://www.pathguy.com/bryanlee/ovca.html).Open in a separate windowFigure 2.Gross anatomic appearance of different stages of ovarian cancer in the chicken The progression from the normal hen ovary to late-stage metastatic ovarian cancer. (A) Normal chicken ovary showing hierarchal clutch of developing follicles and postovulatory follicle; (B) Stage 1 ovarian cancer, confined to ovary with vascularized follicles; (C) Stage 2/3 ovarian cancer, metastasis locally to peritoneal cavity with ascites; (D) Stage 4 ovarian cancer, late stage with metastasis to lung and liver with extensive ascites (photo credits: DB Hales).Open in a separate windowFigure 3.Histologic subtypes in chicken compared with human ovarian cancers. H and E staining of formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissues from hens with ovarian cancer (A through D) and women (E through G). (A) Chicken clear cell carcinoma; (B) Chicken endometrioid carcinoma; (C) Chicken mucinous adenocarcinoma; (D) Chicken serous papillary adenocarcinoma (photo credits: DB Hales). (E) Human clear cell carcinoma; (F) Human endometrioid carcinoma; (G) Human mucinous cystadenocarcinoma; (H) Human serous adenocarcinoma (https://www.womenshealthsection.com).Over the past 2 decades, the laying hen has emerged as a valuable experimental model for EOC, in addition to other in vivo models such as Patient-Derived Xenografts (PDX) and Genetically Engineered Mouse Models (GEMMs). Comparison of the hen model with other animal models has been reviewed elsewhere.72 Modern-day laying hens, such as the white leghorn, have been selected from their ancestor red jungle fowl57 for decreased broodiness and persistent ovulation, resulting in approximately one egg per day, if proper nutrition and light-dark cycles are maintained. Daily rupture and consequent repair of the ovarian surface epithelia (OSE) due to the persistent ovulation promotes potential error during rapid DNA replication. This increases the probability of oncogenic mutations, ultimately leading to neoplasia.137 Inflammation resulting from continuous ovulation also promotes the natural development of EOC.81 By the age of 2.5 to 3 y, laying hens have undergone a similar number of ovulations as a perimenopausal woman. The risk of ovarian cancer in white leghorn hens in this time (4%) is similar to the lifetime risk of ovarian cancer in women (0.35% to 8.8%).125 By the age of 4 to 6 y, the risk of ovarian cancer in hens rises to 30% to 60%.54 The incidence of ovarian carcinoma in the hens, however, depends on the age, genetic strain,80 and the egg-laying frequency of the specific breed.54 The common white leghorn hen has routinely been employed in chicken ovarian cancer studies. On average, hens are exposed to 17 h of light per day, with lights turned on at 0500 h and turned off at 2200 h. The laying hen model of EOC does present some considerable challenges. Despite its great utility for research, the model is still used mainly by agricultural poultry scientists and a small number of ovarian cancer researchers.Comprehensive and proper vivarium support is required to conduct large-scale cancer prevention studies. Only a few facilities are available for biomedical chicken research, including University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Cornell University, Penn State University, NC State, Auburn University, and MS State University. Another difficulty is a lack of available antibodies specific for chicken antigens. Because of the structural dissimilarities between most human proteins and murine antigens to their chicken counterparts, cross-reactivity of available antibodies is also limited. The entire chicken genome was sequenced in 2004;78 however, the chromosomal locus of many key genes, such as p53, are still unknown. Overall, humans and chickens share about 60% of genetic commonality, whereas humans and rats share about 88% of their genes. Specific pathway-mutated strains of chickens are not yet available, limiting the ability to study key pathways in carcinogenesis and prevention of cancer using this model. Although all 5 different subtypes of ovarian cancer are present in hens, their most predominant subtype is different from women. Close to 70% of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer have serous EOC, while the predominant subtype reported in hens is endometrioid.15 However, these comparisons are complicated because observations of cancer in hens consist of both early and late stages of the disease, wherein women, most of the data is from late stage and aggressive ovarian carcinoma.The spontaneous onset of ovarian cancer and the histologic and pathologic similarities to the human form of the disease make laying hens an excellent model for continued research on EOC. To date, a large number of studies have been performed on laying hens. Here we have divided the current studies into 2 groups— (A) studies that have described the molecular presentation of EOC to be similar to that in women; ( Author | Year | Significance | Key molecular targets | Citation | Haritani and colleagues. | 1984 | Investigating ovarian tumors for key gene signatures | Ovalbumin | 71 | Rodriguez-Burford and colleagues. | 2001 | Investigating expressions of clinically important prognostic markers in cancerous hens | CA125, cytokeratin AE1/AE3, pan cytokeratin, Lewis Y, CEA, Tag 72, PCNA, EGFR, erbB-2, p27, TGF{α}, Ki-67, MUC1, and MUC2 | 135 | Giles and colleagues. | 2004, 2006 | Investigating ovarian tumors for key gene signatures | Ovalbumin, PR, PCNA, Vimentin | 62, 63 | Jackson and colleagues. | 2007 | CA125 expression in hen ovarian tumors | CA125 | 79 | Stammer and colleagues. | 2008 | SELENBP1 downregulation in hen ovarian tumors | SELENBP1 | 149 | Hales and colleagues. | 2008 | Cyclooxygenase expressions in hen ovarian tumors | COX1, COX2, PGE2 | 67 | Urick and colleagues. | 2008-2009 | VEGF expression in cultured ascites cells from hen ovarian tumors | VEGF | 160, 161 | Ansenberger and colleagues. | 2009 | Elevation of E-cadherin in hen ovarian tumors | E-cad | 6 | Hakim and colleagues. | 2009 | Investigating oncogenic mutations in hen ovarian tumors | p53, K-ras, H-ras | 66 | Zhuge and colleagues. | 2009 | CYP1B1 levels in chicken ovarian tumors | CYP1B1 | 175 | Seo and colleagues. | 2010 | Upregulation of Claudin-10 in hen ovarian tumors | Claudin-10 | 145 | Trevino and colleagues. | 2010 | Investigating ovarian tumors for key gene signatures | Ovalbumin, Pax2, SerpinB3, OVM, LTF, RD | 157 | Choi and colleagues. | 2011 | Upregulation of MMP-3 in hen ovarian tumor stroma | MMP-3 | 28 | Barua and colleagues. | 2012 | Upregulation of DR6 in hen ovarian tumors | DR6 | 16 | Lee and colleagues. | 2012-2014 | Upregulation of DNA methylation in hen ovarian tumors | DNMT1, DNMT3A, DNMT3B, | SPP1, SERPINB11, SERPINB13 94, 101, 103, 104 | Lim and colleagues. | 2013-2014 | Key genes upregulated in endometrioid hen tumors | AvBD-11, CTNNB1, Wnt4 | 102, 11, 100 | Bradaric and colleagues. | 2013 | Investigating immune cells in hen ovarian tumors | 23 | Ma and colleagues. | 2014 | Identifying unique proteins from proteomic profiling | F2 thrombin, ITIH2 | 106 | Hales and colleagues. | 2014 | Key genes upregulated in hen ovarian tumors | PAX2, MSX2, FOXA2, EN1 | 68 | Parada and colleagues, | 2017 | Unique ganglioside expressed in hen ovarian tumors | NeuGcGM3 | 124 | |
Author | Year | Significance | Citation |
Barnes and colleagues. | 2002 | Medroxyprogesterone study | 14 |
Johnson and colleagues. | 2006 | Different genetic strain of laying hens (C strain and K strain) | 80 |
Urick and colleagues. | 2009 | Dietary aspirin in laying hens | 161 |
Giles and colleagues. | 2010 | Restricted Ovulator strain | 61 |
Carver and colleagues. | 2011 | Calorie-restricted hens | 25 |
Eilati and colleagues. | 2012-2013 | Dietary flaxseed in laying hens | 43, 44, 45 |
Trevino and colleagues. | 2012 | Oral contraceptives in laying hens | 156 |
Rodriguez and colleagues. | 2013 | Calorie-restricted hens with or without Vitamin D and progestin | 136 |
Mocka and colleagues. | 2017 | p53 stabilizer CP-31398 in laying hens | 112 |
To select specific binding peptides for imaging and detection of human ovarian cancer. The phage 12-mer peptide library was used to select specific phage clones to ovarian cancer cells. After four rounds of biopanning, the binding specificity of randomly selected phage clones to ovarian cancer cells was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). DNA sequencing and homology analysis were performed on specifically bound phages. The binding ability of the selected peptides to SKOV3 cells was confirmed by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. After four rounds of optimized biological panning, phage recovery was 34-fold higher than that of the first round, and the specific phage clones bound to SKOV3 cells were significantly enriched. A total of 32 positive phage clones were preliminarily identified by ELISA from 54 randomly selected clones, and the positive rate was 59.3%. S36 was identified as the clone with best affinity to SKOV3 cells via fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. A representative clone of OSP2, S36 is expected to be an effective probe for diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer.
相似文献设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏 |
Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司 京ICP备09084417号 |