Effects of androgen receptor and androgen on gene expression in prostate stromal fibroblasts and paracrine signaling to prostate cancer cells

The androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in a subset of prostate stromal cells and functional stromal cell AR is required for normal prostate developmental and influences the growth of prostate tumors. Although we are broadly aware of the specifics of the genomic actions of AR in prostate cancer cells, relatively little is known regarding the gene targets of functional AR in prostate stromal cells. Here, we describe a novel human prostate stromal cell model that enabled us to study the effects of AR on gene expression in these cells. The model involves a genetically manipulated variant of immortalized human WPMY-1 prostate stromal cells that overexpresses wildtype AR (WPMY-AR) at a level comparable to LNCaP cells and is responsive to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) stimulation. Use of WPMY-AR cells for gene expression profiling showed that the presence of AR, even in the absence of DHT, significantly altered the gene expression pattern of the cells compared to control (WPMY-Vec) cells. Treatment of WPMY-AR cells, but not WPMY-Vec control cells, with DHT resulted in further changes that affected the expression of 141 genes by 2-fold or greater compared to vehicle treated WPMY-AR cells. Remarkably, DHT significantly downregulated more genes than were upregulated but many of these changes reversed the initial effects of AR overexpression alone on individual genes. The genes most highly effected by DHT treatment were categorized based upon their role in cancer pathways or in cell signaling pathways (transforming growth factor-β, Wnt, Hedgehog and MAP Kinase) thought to be involved in stromal-epithelial crosstalk during prostate or prostate cancer development. DHT treatment of WPMY-AR cells was also sufficient to alter their paracrine potential for prostate cancer cells as conditioned medium from DHT-treated WPMY-AR significantly increased growth of LNCaP cells compared to DHT-treated WPMY-Vec cell conditioned medium.     

Wild‐type and specific mutant androgen receptor mediates transcription via 17β‐estradiol in sex hormone‐sensitive cancer cells

We previously encountered regulatory processes wherein dihydrotestosterone (DHT) exerted its inhibitory effect on parathyroid hormone‐related protein (PTHrP) gene repression through the estrogen receptor (ER)α, but not the androgen receptor (AR), in breast cancer MCF‐7 cells. Here, we investigated whether such aberrant ligand‐nuclear receptor (NR) interaction is present in prostate cancer LNCaP cells. First, we confirmed that LNCaP cells expressed large amounts of AR at negligible levels of ERα/β or progesterone receptor. Both suppression of PTHrP and activation of prostate‐specific antigen genes were observed after independent administration of 17β‐estradiol (E2), DHT, or R5020. Consistent with the notion that the LNCaP AR lost its ligand specificity due to a mutation (Thr‐Ala877), experiments with siRNA targeting the respective NR revealed that the AR monopolized the role of the mediator of shared hormone‐dependent regulation, which was invariably associated with nuclear translocation of this mutant AR. Microarray analysis of gene regulation by DHT, E2, or R5020 disclosed that more than half of the genes downstream of the AR (Thr‐Ala877) overlapped in the LNCaP cells. Of particular interest, we realized that the AR (wild‐type [wt]) and AR (Thr‐Ala877) were equally responsible for the E2‐AR interactions. Fluorescence microscopy experiments demonstrated that both EGFP‐AR (wt) and EGFP‐AR (Thr‐Ala877) were exclusively localized within the nucleus after E2 or DHT treatment. Furthermore, reporter assays revealed that some other cancer cells exhibited aberrant E2‐AR (wt) signaling similar to that in the LNCaP cells. We herein postulate the presence of entangled interactions between wt AR and E2 in certain hormone‐sensitive cancer cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 230: 1594–1606, 2015. © 2014 The Authors. Journal of Cellular Physiology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A mutation in β‐tubulin and a sustained dependence on androgen receptor signalling in a newly established docetaxel‐resistant prostate cancer cell line

The mechanisms of docetaxel resistance in PC (prostate cancer) are unclear because of the lack of suitable experimental models, and no effective treatment exists for docetaxel‐resistant PC. We established a docetaxel‐resistant cell line, LNDCr, from an androgen‐refractory PC cell line, LNCaP‐hr, by intermittent exposure to docetaxel in vitro. The LNDCr cells harboured an F270I mutation in class I β‐tubulin, and demonstrated impaired tubulin polymerization by docetaxel. AR signalling was sustained in LNDCr cells, and AR knockdown suppressed the growth of LNDCr cells. These results suggest that an acquired mutation in β‐tubulin is associated with docetaxel resistance in PC and that a novel AR‐targeted therapy is effective for docetaxel‐resistant PC.     

Hormonal regulation of transforming growth factor β-2 expression in human prostate cancer

We have previously shown that a transforming factor-β species (TGFβ) is a hormonally regulated negative growth factor in estrogen responsive MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. We now demonstrate that androgen withdrawal leads to a significant stimulation of TGFβ-2 mRNA in the androgen-responsive human prostate carcinoma cell line LNCaP. These data indicate that TGFβ-2 is a marker of (anti)androgen action in human prostate cancer in vitro. Based on these results we addressed the question of whether THGβ-2 represented a marker of (anti)androgen action in prostate cancer in vivo: expression of TGFβ mRNA was determined by RNAase protection analysis in normal and malignant prostate tissue obtained from 9 prostate carcinoma patients without endocrine therapy. In parallel, the nuclear dihydrotestosterone (DHT) concentration was measured as an indicator of androgen stimulation in the same tissues. The following results were obtained. Both normal and cancerous tissues show nuclear accumulation of DHT indicating a functional androgen receptor system. TGFβ-2 is equally expressed in both normal and cancerous tissue. Expression of TGFβ-2 and nuclear DHT concentrations are correlated in both benign and malignant tissue. We conclude that TGFβ-2 is a marker of (anti)hormonal action in androgen-dependent tissue.     

Similarities and Distinctions in Actions of Surface-Directed and Classic Androgen Receptor Antagonists

The androgen receptor (AR) surface-directed antagonist MJC13 inhibits AR function and proliferation of prostate cancer (PC) cells. These effects are related to arrest of an AR/chaperone complex in the cytoplasm. Here, we compared MJC13 and classic AR antagonists such as flutamide and bicalutamide. Microarray analysis and confirmatory qRT-PCR reveals that MJC13 and flutamide inhibit dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-dependent genes in LNCaP PC cells. Both compounds are equally effective on a genome wide basis and as effective as second generation AR antagonists (MDV3100, ARN-509) at selected genes. MJC13 inhibits AR binding to the prostate specific antigen (PSA) promoter more strongly than flutamide, consistent with different mechanisms of action. Examination of efficacy of MJC13 in conditions that reflect aspects castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) reveals that it inhibits flutamide activation of an AR mutant (ART877A) that emerges during flutamide withdrawal syndrome, but displays greatly restricted gene-specific activity in 22Rv1 cells that express a constitutively active truncated AR and is inactive against glucocorticoid receptor (GR), which can co-opt androgen-dependent signaling networks in CRPC. Importantly, MJC13 inhibits AR interactions with SRC2 and β-catenin in the nucleus and, unlike flutamide, strongly inhibits amplification of AR activity obtained with transfected SRC2 and β-catenin. MJC13 also inhibits DHT and β-catenin-enhanced cell division in LNCaP cells. Thus, a surface-directed antagonist can block AR activity in some conditions in which a classic antagonist fails and may display utility in particular forms of CRPC.     

Androgen regulation of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A3 (ALDH1A3) in the androgen-responsive human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP

Previous gene array data from our laboratory identified the retinoic acid (RA) biosynthesis enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A3 (ALDH1A3) as a putative androgen-responsive gene in human prostate cancer epithelial (LNCaP) cells. In the present study, we attempted to identify if any of the three ALDH1A/RA synthesis enzymes are androgen responsive and how this may affect retinoid-mediated effects in LNCaP cells. We demonstrated that exposure of LNCaP cells to the androgen dihydrotestosterone (DHT) results in a 4-fold increase in ALDH1A3 mRNA levels compared with the untreated control. The mRNA for two other ALDH1A family members, ALDH1A1 and ALDH1A2, were not detected and not induced by DHT in LNCaP cells. Inhibition of androgen receptor (AR) with both the antiandrogen bicalutamide and small interfering RNA for AR support that ALDH1A3 regulation by DHT is mediated by AR. Furthermore, specific inhibition of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase and Src family of kinases with PD98059 and PP1 supports that AR's regulation of ALDH1A3 occurs by the typical AR nuclear-translocation cascade. Consistent with an increase in ALDH1A3 mRNA, DHT-treated LNCaP cells showed an 8-fold increase in retinaldehyde-dependent NAD(+) reduction compared with control. Lastly, treatment of LNCaP with all-trans retinal (RAL) in the presence of DHT resulted in significant up-regulation of the RA-inducible, RA-metabolizing enzyme CYP26A1 mRNA compared with RAL treatment alone. Taken together, these data suggest that (i) the RA biosynthesis enzyme ALDH1A3 is androgen responsive and (ii) DHT up-regulation of ALDH1A3 can increase the oxidation of retinal to RA and indirectly affect RA bioactivity and metabolism.     

Proliferative and androgenic effects of indirubin derivatives in LNCaP human prostate cancer cells at sub-apoptotic concentrations

Certain indirubin derivatives are potent cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and glycogen synthase kinase (GSK-3β) inhibitors and may be effective against various cancers. We evaluated the effects of aloisine A, alsterpaullone, aminopurvalanol, indirubin-3′-oxime, 6-Br-indirubin-3′-oxime, kenpaullone, olomoucine and roscovitine on cell proliferation, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) expression, androgen receptor (AR) activation, and GSK-3β and β-catenin expression in androgen-dependent LNCaP human prostate cancer cells. Effects were also evaluated in MDA-kb2 human breast cancer cells containing an AR-responsive luciferase construct. Steroid-deprived LNCaP cells were exposed to indirubins ± dihydrotestosterone (DHT, 0.1 nM) and cell proliferation was assessed by MTT assay after 120 h. PSA expression was determined by real-time quantitative RT-PCR after 24 h. Cytoplasmic and nuclear GSK-3β/β-catenin expression and phosphorylation status was determined by Western blotting. Effects on MDA-kb2 luciferase expression were determined after 24 h using Steady-Glo (Promega). Indirubin-3′-oxime, 6-Br-indirubin-3′-oxime, alsterpaullone and kenpaullone increased LNCaP cell proliferation and PSA expression (0.03–1 μM; apoptosis occurred >1 μM), whereas aminopurvalanol significantly (p < 0.05) reduced DHT-stimulated PSA expression (31%) at 1 nM. The other indirubin derivatives had no effect. The same was observed for induction of AR-dependent MDA-kb2 luciferase expression. Kenpaullone (1, 3 μM) decreased the active- and increased the inactive form of cytoplasmic GSK-3β, and increased nuclear AR and β-catenin accumulation. Flutamide (10 μM), unexpectedly, also strongly increased nuclear β-catenin accumulation. Indirubin derivatives that were potent GSK-3β inhibitors (relative to CDK1) stimulated LNCaP cell proliferation and other androgenic responses, suggesting (in a cancer treatment context) these compounds may increase AR-dependent prostate cancer growth if not used within an appropriate therapeutic dose-range.     

PI3 Kinase inhibition on TRAIL-induced apoptosis correlates with androgen-sensitivity and p21 expression in prostate cancer cells

TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) can induce apoptosis in many types of cancer cells. TRAIL is considered a therapeutic target, therefore, it was of interest to examine molecular mechanisms that may modulate sensitivity to TRAIL signaling in prostate cancer cells. LNCaP cells were found to be relatively resistant to TRAIL induced cell death while PC3 cells were sensitive. PI3-kinase (PI3 K) inhibitors were able to render LNCaP cells sensitive to TRAIL but conferred resistance to PC3 cells. PI3 K inhibitors were associated with an increase in p21^{waf1, cip1} expression in PC3 cells where as p21 decreases in LNCaP cells suggesting that p21 may impart TRAIL resistance. Since androgen receptor (AR) signaling can be modulated by AKT, and p21 is an AR responsive gene, the impact of PI3 K inhibition on TRAIL sensitivity was evaluated in AR transfected PC3 cells (PC3AR). The expression of AR was significantly downregulated by PI3 K inhibition in LNCaP cells, which have an intact AR signaling axis. PC3AR cells expressed higher levels of p21 protein and were relatively resistant to TRAIL compared to control cells. Finally, using adenoviral p21 gene transfer we directly demonstrated that p21 can confer resistance to TRAIL-induced cell death. These results suggest that TRAIL resistance is not regulated simply by a PI3 K/AKT survival pathway associated with inactivating PTEN mutations but may also be modulated by downstream AR responsive targets such as p21. These findings may have significant clinical implications for the utility of TRAIL in the management of prostate cancer.     

Isolation of a New Quinoline, 2,8-Dihydroxycinchoninic Acid from Corn Steep Liquor

Androgen receptor (AR) signaling is the master regulator of prostate cell growth. Here, to better understand AR signaling, we searched for AR-interacting proteins by yeast two-hybrid screening and identified protein arginine methyltransferase 10 (PRMT10) as one of the interacting proteins. PRMT10 was highly expressed in reproductive tissues, such as prostate. Immunostaining showed that PRMT10 was expressed in the nucleus of both epithelia and stroma of rat prostate. In human prostate cancer LNCaP cells, PRMT10 co-immunoprecipitated with AR in both the presence and absence of dihydrotestosterone (DHT). Knockdown of PRMT10 by siRNA decreased DHT-dependent LNCaP cell growth and induction of prostate-specific antigen, an AR-target gene, without apparent loss of AR. DHT decreased PRMT10 at both the mRNA and protein levels. The decrease in PRMT10 was canceled by knockdown of AR or an AR antagonist. These results indicate that PRMT10 plays an important role in androgen-dependent proliferation of prostate cancer cells.     

The PPARγ ligand ciglitazone regulates androgen receptor activation differently in androgen-dependent versus androgen-independent human prostate cancer cells

The androgen receptor (AR) regulates growth and progression of androgen-dependent as well as androgen-independent prostate cancer cells. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonists have been reported to reduce AR activation in androgen-dependent LNCaP prostate cancer cells. To determine whether PPARγ ligands are equally effective at inhibiting AR activity in androgen-independent prostate cancer, we examined the effect of the PPARγ ligands ciglitazone and rosiglitazone on C4-2 cells, an androgen- independent derivative of the LNCaP cell line. Luciferase-based reporter assays and Western blot analysis demonstrated that PPARγ ligand reduced dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-induced increases in AR activity in LNCaP cells. However, in C4-2 cells, these compounds increased DHT-induced AR driven luciferase activity. In addition, ciglitazone did not significantly alter DHT-mediated increases in prostate specific antigen (PSA) protein or mRNA levels within C4-2 cells. siRNA-based experiments demonstrated that the ciglitazone-induced regulation of AR activity observed in C4-2 cells was dependent on the presence of PPARγ. Furthermore, overexpression of the AR corepressor cyclin D1 inhibited the ability of ciglitazone to induce AR luciferase activity in C4-2 cells. Thus, our data suggest that both PPARγ and cyclin D1 levels influence the ability of ciglitazone to differentially regulate AR signaling in androgen-independent C4-2 prostate cancer cells.