Electron microscopic studies of the translin octameric ring

Translin is thought to participate in a variety of cellular activities including chromosomal translocations, translational regulation of mRNA expression, and mRNA transport. It forms an octameric ring structure capable of sequence-specific binding of both DNA and RNA substrates. We have used electron microscopy and single-particle image analysis to generate a three-dimensional reconstruction of the Translin ring. The subunits appear to have two distinct domains that assemble to form an open channel with diameter of approximately 30 A at one end and approximately 50 A at the opposite end. In the presence of either DNA or RNA containing consensus binding sequences, the largest opening into the central cavity is filled with density. Strikingly, although Translin shows significant sequence homology to only one other protein, Translin-associated factor X, the quaternary organization and the dimerization of subunits in the ring are very similar to those observed for hexameric ring helicases. This suggests that many of the structures in DNA and RNA metabolism may have similar quaternary organization.     

1H, 15N and 13C resonance assignments and secondary structure determination of the RNA-binding domain of E. coli rho protein

Summary Protein fragments containing the RNA-binding domain of Escherichia coli rho protein have been over-expressed in E. coli. NMR spectra of the fragment containing residues 1–116 of rho protein (Rho116) show that a region of this protein is unfolded in solution. Addition of (dC)₁₀ to this fragment stabilizes the folded form of the protein. The fragment comprising residues 1–130 of rho protein (Rho130) is found to be stably folded, both in the absence and presence of nucleic acid. NMR studies of the complex of Rho 130 with RNA and DNA oligonucleotides indicate that the binding-site size, affinity, and specificity of Rho 130 are similar to those of intact rho protein; therefore, Rho 130 is a suitable model of the RNA-binding domain of rho protein. NMR line widths as well as titration experiments of Rho130 complexed with oligonucleotides of various lengths suggest that Rho130 forms oligomers in the presence of longer oligonucleotides. ¹H, ¹⁵N and ¹³C resonance assignments were facilitated by the utilization of two pulse sequences, CN-NOESY and CCH-TOCSY. The secondary structure of unliganded Rho130 has been determined by NMR techniques, and it is clear that the RNA-binding domain of rho is more structurally similar to the cold shock domain than to the RNA recognition motif.Abbreviations Rho116, Rho130 protein containing the first 116 (130) residues of rho - CSD cold shock domain - RRM RNA recognition motif - RBD RNA-binding domain - IPTG isopropyl -D-thiogalactopyranoside - EDTA ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid - NOE nuclear Overhauser enhancement     

RNA loop-loop interactions as dynamic functional motifs

RNA loop-loop interactions are frequently used to trigger initial recognition between two RNA molecules. In this review, we present selected well-documented cases that illustrate the diversity of biological processes using RNA loop-loop recognition properties. The first one is related to natural antisense RNAs that play a variety of regulatory functions in bacteria and their extra-chromosomal elements. The second one concerns the dimerization of HIV-1 genomic RNA, which is responsible for the encapsidation of a diploid RNA genome. The third one concerns RNA interactions involving double-loop interactions. These are used by the bicoid mRNA to form dimers, a property that appears to be important for mRNA localization in drosophila embryo, and by bacteriophage phi29 pRNA which forms hexamers that participate in the translocation of the DNA genome through the portal vertex of the capsid. Despite the high diversity of systems and mechanisms, some common features can be highlighted. (1) Efficient recognition requires rapid bi-molecular binding rates, regardless of the RNA pairing scheme. (2) The initial recognition is favored by particular conformations of the loops enabling a proper presentation of nucleotides (generally a restricted number) that initiate the recognition process. (3) The fate of the initial reversible loop-loop complex is dictated by both functional and structural constraints. RNA structures have evolved either to "freeze" the initial complex, or to convert it into a more stable one, which involves propagation of intermolecular interactions along topologically feasible pathways. Stabilization of the initial complex may also be assisted by proteins and/or formation of additional contacts.     

Solution structure of the two RNA recognition motifs of hnRNP A1 using segmental isotope labeling: how the relative orientation between RRMs influences the nucleic acid binding topology

Human hnRNP A1 is a multi-functional protein involved in many aspects of nucleic-acid processing such as alternative splicing, micro-RNA biogenesis, nucleo-cytoplasmic mRNA transport and telomere biogenesis and maintenance. The N-terminal region of hnRNP A1, also named unwinding protein 1 (UP1), is composed of two closely related RNA recognition motifs (RRM), and is followed by a C-terminal glycine rich region. Although crystal structures of UP1 revealed inter-domain interactions between RRM1 and RRM2 in both the free and bound form of UP1, these interactions have never been established in solution. Moreover, the relative orientation of hnRNP A1 RRMs is different in the free and bound crystal structures of UP1, raising the question of the biological significance of this domain movement. In the present study, we have used NMR spectroscopy in combination with segmental isotope labeling techniques to carefully analyze the inter-RRM contacts present in solution and subsequently determine the structure of UP1 in solution. Our data unambiguously demonstrate that hnRNP A1 RRMs interact in solution, and surprisingly, the relative orientation of the two RRMs observed in solution is different from the one found in the crystal structure of free UP1 and rather resembles the one observed in the nucleic-acid bound form of the protein. This strongly supports the idea that the two RRMs of hnRNP A1 have a single defined relative orientation which is the conformation previously observed in the bound form and now observed in solution using NMR. It is likely that the conformation in the crystal structure of the free form is a less stable form induced by crystal contacts. Importantly, the relative orientation of the RRMs in proteins containing multiple-RRMs strongly influences the RNA binding topologies that are practically accessible to these proteins. Indeed, RRM domains are asymmetric binding platforms contacting single-stranded nucleic acids in a single defined orientation. Therefore, the path of the nucleic acid molecule on the multiple RRM domains is strongly dependent on whether the RRMs are interacting with each other. The different nucleic acid recognition modes by multiple-RRM domains are briefly reviewed and analyzed on the basis of the current structural information.     

Difference in conformational diversity between nucleic acids with a six-membered 'sugar' unit and natural 'furanose' nucleic acids

Natural nucleic acids duplexes formed by Watson-Crick base pairing fold into right-handed helices that are classified in two families of secondary structures, i.e. the A- and B-form. For a long time, these A and B allomorphic nucleic acids have been considered as the 'non plus ultra' of double-stranded nucleic acids geometries with the only exception of Z-DNA, a left-handed helix that can be adopted by some DNA sequences. The five-membered furanose ring in the sugar-phosphate backbone of DNA and RNA is the underlying cause of this restriction in conformational diversity. A collection of new Watson-Crick duplexes have joined the 'original' nucleic acid double helixes at the moment the furanose sugar was replaced by different types of six-membered ring systems. The increase in this structural and conformational diversity originates from the rigid chair conformation of a saturated six-membered ring that determines the orientation of the ring substituents with respect to each other. The original A- and B-form oligonucleotide duplexes have expanded into a whole family of new structures with the potential for selective cross-communication in a parallel or antiparallel orientation, opening up a new world for information storage and for molecular recognition-directed self-organization.     

Themes in RNA-protein recognition.

Atomic resolution structures are now available for more than 20 complexes of proteins with specific RNAs. This review examines two main themes that appear in this set of structures. A "groove binder" class of proteins places a protein structure (alpha-helix, 310-helix, beta-ribbon, or irregular loop) in the groove of an RNA helix, recognizing both the specific sequence of bases and the shape or dimensions of the groove, which are sometimes distorted from the normal A-form. A second class of proteins uses beta-sheet surfaces to create pockets that examine single-stranded RNA bases. Some of these proteins recognize completely unstructured RNA, and in others RNA secondary structure indirectly promotes binding by constraining bases in an appropriate orientation. Thermodynamic studies have shown that binding specificity is generally a function of several factors, including base-specific hydrogen bonds, non-polar contacts, and mutual accommodation of the protein and RNA-binding surfaces. The recognition strategies and structural frameworks used by RNA binding proteins are not exotically different from those employed by DNA-binding proteins, suggesting that the two kinds of nucleic acid-binding proteins have not evolved independently.     

Thermodynamics of nucleic acid "shape readout" by an aminosugar

Recognition of nucleic acids is important for our understanding of nucleic acid structure as well as for our understanding of nucleic acid-protein interactions. In addition to the direct readout mechanisms of nucleic acids such as H-bonding, shape recognition of nucleic acids is being increasingly recognized as playing an equally important role in DNA recognition. Competition dialysis, UV, flourescent intercalator displacement (FID), computational docking, and calorimetry studies were conducted to study the interaction of neomycin with a variety of nucleic acid conformations (shapes). At pH 5.5, the results suggest the following. (1) Neomycin binds three RNA structures [16S A site rRNA, poly(rA)·poly(rA), and poly(rA)·poly(rU)] with high affinities (K(a) ~ 10(7) M(-1)). (2) The binding of neomycin to A-form GC-rich oligomer d(A(2)G(15)C(15)T(2))(2) has an affinity comparable to those of RNA structures. (3) The binding of neomycin to DNA·RNA hybrids shows a 3-fold variance that can be attributed to their structural differences [for poly(dA)·poly(rU), K(a) = 9.4 × 10(6) M(-1), and for poly(rA)·poly(dT), K(a) = 3.1 × 10(6) M(-1)]. (4) The interaction of neomycin with DNA triplex poly(dA)·2poly(dT) yields a binding affinity (K(a)) of 2.4 × 10(5) M(-1). (5) Poly(dA-dT)(2) shows the lowest association constant for all nucleic acids studied (K(a) < 10(5)). (6) Neomycin binds to G-quadruplexes with K(a) values of ~10(4)-10(5) M(-1). (7) Computational studies show that the decrease in major groove width in the B to A transition correlates with increasing neomycin affinity. Neomycin's affinity for various nucleic acid structures can be ranked as follows: RNAs and GC-rich d(A(2)G(15)C(15)T(2))(2) structures > poly(dA)·poly(rU) > poly(rA)·poly(dT) > T·A-T triplex, G-quadruplex, B-form AT-rich, or GC-rich DNA sequences. The results illustrate the first example of a small molecule-based "shape readout" of different nucleic acid conformations.