Errors from selective disruption of the editing center in a tRNA synthetase

Some aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases have two catalytic centers that together achieve fine-structure discrimination of closely similar amino acids. The role of tRNA is to stimulate translocation of a misactivated amino acid from the active site to the editing site where the misactivated substrate is eliminated by hydrolysis. Using isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase as an example, we placed mutations in the catalytic center for editing at residues strongly conserved from bacteria to humans. A particular single substitution and one double substitution resulted in production of mischarged tRNA, by interfering specifically with the chemical step of hydrolytic editing. The substitutions affected neither amino acid activation nor aminoacylation, with the cognate amino acid. Thus, because of the demonstrated functional independence of the two catalytic sites, errors of aminoacylation can be generated by selective mutations in the center for editing.     

Two conserved threonines collaborate in the Escherichia coli leucyl-tRNA synthetase amino acid editing mechanism

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases covalently link transfer RNAs to their cognate amino acids. Some of the tRNA synthetases have employed an editing mechanism to ensure fidelity in this first step of protein synthesis. The amino acid editing active site for Escherichia coli leucyl-tRNA synthetase resides within the CP1 domain that folds discretely from the main body of the enzyme. A portion of the editing active site is lined with conserved threonines. Previously, we identified one of these threonine residues (Thr(252)) as a critical amino acid specificity factor. On the basis of X-ray crystal structure information, two other nearby threonine residues (Thr(247) and Thr(248)) were hypothesized to interact with the editing substrate near its cleavage site. Single mutations of either of these conserved threonine residues had minimal effects on amino acid editing. However, double mutations that deleted the hydroxyl group from the neighboring threonine residues abolished amino acid editing activity. We propose that these threonine residues, which are also conserved in the homologous isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase and valyl-tRNA synthetase editing active sites, play a central role in amino acid editing. It is possible that they collaborate in stabilizing the transition state.     

Transfer RNA modulates the editing mechanism used by class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the attachment of amino acids to their cognate tRNAs. To prevent errors in protein synthesis, many synthetases have evolved editing pathways by which misactivated amino acids (pre-transfer editing) and misacylated tRNAs (post-transfer editing) are hydrolyzed. Previous studies have shown that class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) possesses both pre- and post-transfer editing functions against noncognate alanine. To assess the relative contributions of pre- and post-transfer editing, presented herein are kinetic studies of an Escherichia coli ProRS mutant in which post-transfer editing is selectively inactivated, effectively isolating the pre-transfer editing pathway. When post-transfer editing is abolished, substantial levels of alanine mischarging are observed under saturating amino acid conditions, indicating that pre-transfer editing alone cannot prevent the formation of Ala-tRNA Pro. Steady-state kinetic parameters for aminoacylation measured under these conditions reveal that the preference for proline over alanine is 2000-fold, which is well within the regime where editing is required. Simultaneous measurement of AMP and Ala-tRNA Pro formation in the presence of tRNA Pro suggested that misactivated alanine is efficiently transferred to tRNA to form the mischarged product. In the absence of tRNA, enzyme-catalyzed Ala-AMP hydrolysis is the dominant form of editing, with "selective release" of noncognate adenylate from the active site constituting a minor pathway. Studies with human and Methanococcus jannaschii ProRS, which lack a post-transfer editing domain, suggest that enzymatic pre-transfer editing occurs within the aminoacylation active site. Taken together, the results reported herein illustrate how both pre- and post-transfer editing pathways work in concert to ensure accurate aminoacylation by ProRS.     

Modulation of substrate specificity within the amino acid editing site of leucyl-tRNA synthetase

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases covalently link transfer RNAs to their cognate amino acids. Some of the tRNA synthetases have evolved editing mechanisms to ensure fidelity in this first step of protein synthesis. The amino acid editing site for leucyl- (LeuRS) and isoleucyl- (IleRS) tRNA synthetases reside within homologous CP1 domains. In each case, a threonine-rich peptide and a second conserved GTG region that are separated by about 100 amino acids comprise parts of the hydrolytic editing site. While a number of sites are conserved between these two enzymes and likely confer a commonality to the mechanisms, some positions are idiosyncratic to LeuRS or IleRS. Herein, we provide evidence that a conserved arginine and threonine at respective sites in LeuRS and IleRS diverged to confer amino acid substrate recognition. This site complements other sites in the amino acid binding pocket of the editing active site of Escherichia coli LeuRS, including Thr252 and Val338, which collectively fine-tune amino acid specificity to confer fidelity.     

Species-specific differences in amino acid editing by class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are a family of enzymes responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the genetic code by specifically attaching a particular amino acid to their cognate tRNA substrates. Through primary sequence alignments, prolyl-tRNA synthetases (ProRSs) have been divided into two phylogenetically divergent groups. We have been interested in understanding whether the unusual evolutionary pattern of ProRSs corresponds to functional differences as well. Previously, we showed that some features of tRNA recognition and aminoacylation are indeed group-specific. Here, we examine the species-specific differences in another enzymatic activity, namely amino acid editing. Proofreading or editing provides a mechanism by which incorrectly activated amino acids are hydrolyzed and thus prevented from misincorporation into proteins. "Prokaryotic-like" Escherichia coli ProRS has recently been shown to be capable of misactivating alanine and possesses both pretransfer and post-transfer hydrolytic editing activity against this noncognate amino acid. We now find that two ProRSs belonging to the "eukaryotic-like" group exhibit differences in their hydrolytic editing activity. Whereas ProRS from Methanococcus jannaschii is similar to E. coli in its ability to hydrolyze misactivated alanine via both pretransfer and post-transfer editing pathways, human ProRS lacks these activities. These results have implications for the selection or design of antibiotics that specifically target the editing active site of the prokaryotic-like group of ProRSs.     

In vitro assays for the determination of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase editing activity

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are essential enzymes that help to ensure the fidelity of protein translation by accurately aminoacylating (or "charging") specific tRNA substrates with cognate amino acids. Many synthetases have an additional catalytic activity to confer amino acid editing or proofreading. This activity relieves ambiguities during translation of the genetic code that result from one synthetase activating multiple amino acid substrates. In this review, we describe methods that have been developed for assaying both pre- and post-transfer editing activities. Pre-transfer editing is defined as hydrolysis of a misactivated aminoacyl-adenylate prior to transfer to the tRNA. This reaction has been reported to occur either in the aminoacylation active site or in a separate editing domain. Post-transfer editing refers to the hydrolysis reaction that cleaves the aminoacyl-ester linkage formed between the carbonyl carbon of the amino acid and the 2' or 3' hydroxyl group of the ribose on the terminal adenosine. Post-transfer editing takes place in a hydrolytic active site that is distinct from the site of amino acid activation. Here, we focus on methods for determination of steady-state reaction rates using editing assays developed for both classes of synthetases.     

An aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase with a defunct editing site

Many aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) contain two active sites, a synthetic site catalyzing aminoacyl-adenylate formation and tRNA aminoacylation and a second editing or proofreading site that hydrolyzes misactivated adenylates or mischarged tRNAs. The combined activities of these two sites lead to rigorous accuracy in tRNA aminoacylation, and both activities are essential to LeuRS and other aaRSs. Here, we describe studies of the human mitochondrial (hs mt) LeuRS indicating that the two active sites of this enzyme have undergone functional changes that impact how accurate aminoacylation is achieved. The sequence of the hs mt LeuRS closely resembles a bacterial LeuRS overall but displays significant variability in regions of the editing site. Studies comparing Escherichia coli and hs mt LeuRS reveal that the proofreading activity of the mt enzyme is disrupted by these sequence changes, as significant levels of Ile-tRNA(Leu) are formed in the presence of high concentrations of the noncognate amino acid. Experiments monitoring deacylation of Ile-tRNA(Leu) and misactivated adenylate turnover revealed that the editing active site is not operational. However, hs mt LeuRS has weaker binding affinities for both cognate and noncognate amino acids relative to the E. coli enzyme and an elevated discrimination ratio. Therefore, the enzyme achieves fidelity using a more specific synthetic active site that is not prone to errors under physiological conditions. This enhanced specificity must compensate for the presence of a defunct editing site and ensures translational accuracy.     

Transiently misacylated tRNA is a primer for editing of misactivated adenylates by class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

The genetic code depends on amino acid fine structure discrimination by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. For isoleucyl- (IleRS) and valyl-tRNA synthetases (ValRS), reactions that hydrolyze misactivated noncognate amino acids help to achieve high accuracy in aminoacylation. Two editing pathways contribute to aminoacylation fidelity: pretransfer and post-transfer. In pretransfer editing, the misactivated amino acid is hydrolyzed as an aminoacyl adenylate, while in post-transfer editing a misacylated tRNA is deacylated. Both reactions are dependent on a tRNA cofactor and require translocation to a site located approximately 30 A from the site of amino acid activation. Using a series of 3'-end modified tRNAs that are deficient in either aminoacylation, deacylation, or both, total editing (the sum of pre- and post-transfer editing) was shown to require both aminoacylation and deacylation activities. These and additional results with IleRS are consistent with a post-transfer deacylation event initiating formation of an editing-active enzyme/tRNA complex. In this state, the primed complex processively edits misactivated valyl-adenylate via the pretransfer route. Thus, misacylated tRNA is an obligatory intermediate for editing by either pathway.     

Molecular dissection of a critical specificity determinant within the amino acid editing domain of leucyl-tRNA synthetase

A highly conserved threonine residue marks the amino acid binding pocket within the editing active site of leucyl-tRNA synthetases (LeuRSs). It is essential to substrate specificity for the Escherichia coli enzyme in that it blocks the cognate leucine amino acid from binding in the hydrolytic editing active site. We combined mutagenesis and computational approaches to elucidate the molecular role of the critical side chain of this threonine residue. Removal of the terminal methyl group of the threonine side chain by replacement with serine yielded a mutant LeuRS that hydrolyzes Leu-tRNA(Leu). Substitution of valine for the conserved threonine conferred similar activities to the wild-type enzyme. However, an additional substitution within the editing active site suggested synergistic interactions with the conserved threonine site that significantly affected amino acid editing. On the basis of our combined biochemical and computational data, we propose that the threonine 252 side chain not only sterically hinders the cognate charged leucine from binding for hydrolysis but also plays a critical role in maintaining an active site geometry that is required for the fidelity of LeuRS.     

Achieving error-free translation; the mechanism of proofreading of threonyl-tRNA synthetase at atomic resolution

The fidelity of aminoacylation of tRNA(Thr) by the threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS) requires the discrimination of the cognate substrate threonine from the noncognate serine. Misacylation by serine is corrected in a proofreading or editing step. An editing site has been located 39 A away from the aminoacylation site. We report the crystal structures of this editing domain in its apo form and in complex with the serine product, and with two nonhydrolyzable analogs of potential substrates: the terminal tRNA adenosine charged with serine, and seryl adenylate. The structures show how serine is recognized, and threonine rejected, and provide the structural basis for the editing mechanism, a water-mediated hydrolysis of the mischarged tRNA. When the adenylate analog binds in the editing site, a phosphate oxygen takes the place of one of the catalytic water molecules, thereby blocking the reaction. This rules out a correction mechanism that would occur before the binding of the amino acid on the tRNA.     

Functional role of the prokaryotic proline-tRNA synthetase insertion domain in amino acid editing

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the attachment of specific amino acids to cognate tRNAs in a two-step process that is critical for the faithful translation of genetic information. During the first chemical step of tRNA aminoacylation, noncognate amino acids that are smaller than or isosteric with the cognate substrate can be misactivated. Thus, to maintain high accuracy during protein translation, some synthetases have evolved an editing mechanism. Previously, we showed that class II Escherichia coli proline-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) is capable of (1) weakly misactivating Ala, (2) hydrolyzing the misactivated Ala-AMP in a reaction known as pretransfer editing, and (3) deacylating a mischarged Ala-tRNA(Pro) variant via a post-transfer editing pathway. In contrast to most systems where an editing function has been established, pretransfer editing by E. coli ProRS occurs in a tRNA-independent fashion. However, neither the pre- nor the post-transfer editing active site(s) has been identified. Sequence analyses revealed that most prokaryotic ProRSs possess a large insertion domain (INS) between class II conserved motifs 2 and 3. The function of the approximately 180-amino acid INS in E. coli ProRS is the subject of this investigation. Alignment-guided Ala scanning mutagenesis was carried out to test conserved amino acid residues present in the INS for their role in pre- and post-transfer editing. Our biochemical data and modeling studies suggest that the prokaryotic INS plays a critical role in editing and that this activity resides in a domain that is functionally and structurally distinct from the aminoacylation active site.     

Role for a conserved structural motif in assembly of a class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase active site

The catalytic domains of class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are built around a conserved Rossmann nucleotide binding fold, with additional polypeptide domains responsible for tRNA binding or hydrolytic editing of misacylated substrates. Structural comparisons identified a conserved motif bridging the catalytic and anticodon binding domains of class Ia and Ib enzymes. This stem contact fold (SCF) has been proposed to globally orient each enzyme's cognate tRNA by interacting with the inner corner of the L-shaped tRNA. Despite the structural similarity of the SCF among class Ia/Ib enzymes, the sequence conservation is low. We replaced amino acids of the MetRS SCF with portions of the structurally similar glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) motif or with alanine residues. Chimeric variants retained significant tRNA methionylation activity, indicating that structural integrity of the helix-turn-strand-helix motif contributes more to tRNA aminoacylation than does amino acid identity. In contrast, chimeras were significantly reduced in methionyl adenylate synthesis, suggesting a role for the SCF in formation of a structured active site domain. A highly conserved aspartic acid within the MetRS SCF is proposed to make an electrostatic interaction with an active site lysine; these residues were replaced with alanines or conservative substitutions. Both methionyl adenylate formation and methionine transfer were impaired, and activity was not significantly recovered by making the compensatory double substitution.     

Editing of errors in selection of amino acids for protein synthesis.

All living cells must conduct protein synthesis with a high degree of accuracy maintained in the transmission and flow of information from gene to finished protein product. One crucial "quality control" point in maintaining a high level of accuracy is the selectivity by which aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases furnish correctly activated amino acids, attached to tRNA species, as the building blocks for growing protein chains. During selection of amino acids, synthetases very often have to distinguish the cognate substrate from a homolog having just one fewer methyl group in its structure. The binding energy of a methyl group is estimated to contribute only a factor of 100 to the specificity of binding, yet synthetases distinguish such closely related amino acids with a discrimination factor of 10,000 to 100,000. Examples of this include methionine versus homocysteine, isoleucine versus valine, alanine versus glycine, and threonine versus serine. Many investigators have demonstrated in vitro the ability of certain aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to edit, that is, correct or prevent incorrect attachment of amino acids to tRNA molecules. Several major editing pathways are now established from in vitro data. Further, at least some aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases have recently been shown to carry out the editing function in vivo. Editing has been demonstrated to occur in both Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Significant energy is expended by the cell for editing of misactivated amino acids, which can be reflected in the growth rate. Because of this, cellular levels of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, as well as amino acid biosynthetic pathways which yield competing substrates for protein synthesis, must be carefully regulated to prevent excessive editing. High-level expression of recombinant proteins imposes a strain on the biosynthetic capacity of the cell which frequently results in misincorporation of abnormal or wrong amino acids owing in part to limited editing by synthetases. Unbalanced amino acid pools associated with some genetic disorders in humans may also lead to errors in tRNA aminoacylation. The availability of X-ray crystallographic structures of some synthetases, combined with site-directed mutagenesis, allows insights into molecular details of the extraordinary selectivity of synthetases, including the editing function.     

Kinetic Origin of Substrate Specificity in Post-Transfer Editing by Leucyl-tRNA Synthetase

The intrinsic editing capacities of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases ensure a high-fidelity translation of the amino acids that possess effective non-cognate aminoacylation surrogates. The dominant error-correction pathway comprises deacylation of misaminoacylated tRNA within the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase editing site. To assess the origin of specificity of Escherichia coli leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) against the cognate aminoacylation product in editing, we followed binding and catalysis independently using cognate leucyl- and non-cognate norvalyl-tRNA^Leu and their non-hydrolyzable analogues. We found that the amino acid part (leucine versus norvaline) of (mis)aminoacyl-tRNAs can contribute approximately 10-fold to ground-state discrimination at the editing site. In sharp contrast, the rate of deacylation of leucyl- and norvalyl-tRNA^Leu differed by about 10⁴-fold. We further established the critical role for the A76 3′-OH group of the tRNA^Leu in post-transfer editing, which supports the substrate-assisted deacylation mechanism. Interestingly, the abrogation of the LeuRS specificity determinant threonine 252 did not improve the affinity of the editing site for the cognate leucine as expected, but instead substantially enhanced the rate of leucyl-tRNA^Leu hydrolysis. In line with that, molecular dynamics simulations revealed that the wild-type enzyme, but not the T252A mutant, enforced leucine to adopt the side-chain conformation that promotes the steric exclusion of a putative catalytic water. Our data demonstrated that the LeuRS editing site exhibits amino acid specificity of kinetic origin, arguing against the anticipated prominent role of steric exclusion in the rejection of leucine. This feature distinguishes editing from the synthetic site, which relies on ground-state discrimination in amino acid selection.     

Pre-transfer editing by class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase: role of aminoacylation active site in "selective release" of noncognate amino acids

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the attachment of cognate amino acids to specific tRNA molecules. To prevent potential errors in protein synthesis caused by misactivation of noncognate amino acids, some synthetases have evolved editing mechanisms to hydrolyze misactivated amino acids (pre-transfer editing) or misacylated tRNAs (post-transfer editing). In the case of post-transfer editing, synthetases employ a separate editing domain that is distinct from the site of amino acid activation, and the mechanism is believed to involve shuttling of the flexible CCA-3' end of the tRNA from the synthetic active site to the site of hydrolysis. The mechanism of pre-transfer editing is less well understood, and in most cases, the exact site of pre-transfer editing has not been conclusively identified. Here, we probe the pre-transfer editing activity of class II prolyl-tRNA synthetases from five species representing all three kingdoms of life. To locate the site of pre-transfer editing, truncation mutants were constructed by deleting the insertion domain characteristic of bacterial prolyl-tRNA synthetase species, which is the site of post-transfer editing, or the N- or C-terminal extension domains of eukaryotic and archaeal enzymes. In addition, the pre-transfer editing mechanism of Escherichia coli prolyl-tRNA synthetase was probed in detail. These studies show that a separate editing domain is not required for pre-transfer editing by prolyl-tRNA synthetase. The aminoacylation active site plays a significant role in preserving the fidelity of translation by acting as a filter that selectively releases non-cognate adenylates into solution, while protecting the cognate adenylate from hydrolysis.     

RNA minihelices and the decoding of genetic information

The rules of the genetic code are determined by the specific aminoacylation of transfer RNAs by aminoacyl transfer RNA synthetase. A straightforward analysis shows that a system of synthetase-tRNA interactions that relies on anticodons for specificity could, in principle, enable most synthetases to distinguish their cognate tRNA isoacceptors from all others. Although the anticodons of some tRNAs are recognition sites for the cognate aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, for other synthetases the anticodon is dispensable for specific aminoacylation. In particular, alanine and histidine tRNA synthetases aminoacylate small RNA minihelices that reconstruct the part of their cognate tRNAs that is proximate to the amino acid attachment site. Helices with as few as six base pairs can be efficiently aminoacylated. The specificity of aminoacylation is determined by a few nucleotides and can be converted from one amino acid to another by the change of only a few nucleotides. These findings suggest that, for a subgroup of the synthetases, there is a distinct code in the acceptor helix of transfer RNAs that determines aminoacylation specificity.     

Misacylation and editing by Escherichia coli valyl-tRNA synthetase: evidence for two tRNA binding sites.

Valyl-tRNA synthetase (ValRS) has difficulty discriminating between its cognate amino acid, valine, and structurally similar amino acids. To minimize translational errors, the enzyme catalyzes a tRNA-dependent editing reaction that prevents accumulation of misacylated tRNA(Val). Editing occurs with threonine, alanine, serine, and cysteine, as well as with several nonprotein amino acids. The 3'-end of tRNA plays a vital role in promoting the tRNA-dependent editing reaction. Valine tRNA having the universally conserved 3'-terminal adenosine replaced by any other nucleoside does not stimulate the editing activity of ValRS. As a result 3'-end tRNA(Val) mutants, particularly those with 3'-terminal pyrimidines, are stably misacylated with threonine, alanine, serine, and cysteine. Valyl-tRNA synthetase is unable to hydrolytically deacylate misacylated tRNA(Val) terminating in 3'-pyrimidines but does deacylate mischarged tRNA(Val) terminating in adenosine or guanosine. Evidently, a purine at position 76 of tRNA(Val) is essential for translational editing by ValRS. We also observe misacylation of wild-type and 3'-end mutants of tRNA(Val) with isoleucine. Valyl-tRNA synthetase does not edit wild-type tRNA(Val)(A76) mischarged with isoleucine, presumably because isoleucine is only poorly accommodated at the editing site of the enzyme. Misacylated mutant tRNAs as well as 3'-end-truncated tRNA(Val) are mixed noncompetitive inhibitors of the aminoacylation reaction, suggesting that ValRS, a monomeric enzyme, may bind more than one tRNA(Val) molecule. Gel-mobility-shift experiments to characterize the interaction of tRNA(Val) with the enzyme provide evidence for two tRNA binding sites on ValRS.     

Development of tRNA synthetases and connection to genetic code and disease

The genetic code is established by the aminoacylation reactions of aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, where amino acids are matched with triplet anticodons imbedded in the cognate tRNAs. The code established in this way is so robust that it gave birth to the entire tree of life. The tRNA synthetases are organized into two classes, based on their active site architectures. The details of this organization, and other considerations, suggest how the synthetases evolved by gene duplications, and how early proteins may have been statistical in nature, that is, products of a primitive code where one of several similar amino acids was used at a specific position in a polypeptide. The emergence of polypeptides with unique, defined sequences--true chemical entities--required extraordinary specificity of the aminoacylation reaction. This high specificity was achieved by editing activities that clear errors of aminoacylation and thereby prevent mistranslation. Defects in editing activities can be lethal and lead to pathologies in mammalian cells in culture. Even a mild defect in editing is casually associated with neurological disease in the mouse. Defects in editing are also mutagenic in an aging organism and suggest how mistranslation can lead to mutations that are fixed in the genome. Thus, clearance of mischarged tRNAs by the editing activities of tRNA synthetases was essential for development of the tree of life and has a role in the etiology of diseases that is just now being understood.     

The Yin and Yang of tRNA: proper binding of acceptor end determines the catalytic balance of editing and aminoacylation

Faithful translation of the genetic code depends on accurate coupling of amino acids with cognate transfer RNAs (tRNAs) catalyzed by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. The fidelity of leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) depends mainly on proofreading at the pre- and post-transfer levels. During the catalytic cycle, the tRNA CCA-tail shuttles between the synthetic and editing domains to accomplish the aminoacylation and editing reactions. Previously, we showed that the Y330D mutation of Escherichia coli LeuRS, which blocks the entry of the tRNA CCA-tail into the connective polypeptide 1domain, abolishes both tRNA-dependent pre- and post-transfer editing. In this study, we identified the counterpart substitutions, which constrain the tRNA acceptor stem binding within the synthetic active site. These mutations negatively impact the tRNA charging activity while retaining the capacity to activate the amino acid. Interestingly, the mutated LeuRSs exhibit increased global editing activity in the presence of a non-cognate amino acid. We used a reaction mimicking post-transfer editing to show that these mutations decrease post-transfer editing owing to reduced tRNA aminoacylation activity. This implied that the increased editing activity originates from tRNA-dependent pre-transfer editing. These results, together with our previous work, provide a comprehensive assessment of how intra-molecular translocation of the tRNA CCA-tail balances the aminoacylation and editing activities of LeuRS.     

Nucleotide determinants for tRNA-dependent amino acid discrimination by a class I tRNA synthetase

The high accuracy of the genetic code relies on the ability of tRNA synthetases to discriminate rigorously between closely similar amino acids. While the enzymes can detect differences between closely similar amino acids at an accuracy of about 1 part in 100-200, a finer discrimination requires the presence of the cognate tRNA. The role of the tRNA is to direct the misactivated amino acid to a distinct catalytic site for editing where hydrolysis occurs. Previous work showed that three nucleotides at the corner of the L-shaped tRNA were collectively required. Here we show that each of these nucleotides individually contributes to the efficiency of editing. However, all are dispensable for the chemical step of hydrolysis. Instead, these nucleotides are required for translocation of a misactivated amino acid from the active site to the center for editing.