Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence

As part of a World Health Organization-led effort to update the empirical evidence base for the leishmaniases, national experts provided leishmaniasis case data for the last 5 years and information regarding treatment and control in their respective countries and a comprehensive literature review was conducted covering publications on leishmaniasis in 98 countries and three territories (see 'Leishmaniasis Country Profiles Text S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10, S11, S12, S13, S14, S15, S16, S17, S18, S19, S20, S21, S22, S23, S24, S25, S26, S27, S28, S29, S30, S31, S32, S33, S34, S35, S36, S37, S38, S39, S40, S41, S42, S43, S44, S45, S46, S47, S48, S49, S50, S51, S52, S53, S54, S55, S56, S57, S58, S59, S60, S61, S62, S63, S64, S65, S66, S67, S68, S69, S70, S71, S72, S73, S74, S75, S76, S77, S78, S79, S80, S81, S82, S83, S84, S85, S86, S87, S88, S89, S90, S91, S92, S93, S94, S95, S96, S97, S98, S99, S100, S101'). Additional information was collated during meetings conducted at WHO regional level between 2007 and 2011. Two questionnaires regarding epidemiology and drug access were completed by experts and national program managers. Visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis incidence ranges were estimated by country and epidemiological region based on reported incidence, underreporting rates if available, and the judgment of national and international experts. Based on these estimates, approximately 0.2 to 0.4 cases and 0.7 to 1.2 million VL and CL cases, respectively, occur each year. More than 90% of global VL cases occur in six countries: India, Bangladesh, Sudan, South Sudan, Ethiopia and Brazil. Cutaneous leishmaniasis is more widely distributed, with about one-third of cases occurring in each of three epidemiological regions, the Americas, the Mediterranean basin, and western Asia from the Middle East to Central Asia. The ten countries with the highest estimated case counts, Afghanistan, Algeria, Colombia, Brazil, Iran, Syria, Ethiopia, North Sudan, Costa Rica and Peru, together account for 70 to 75% of global estimated CL incidence. Mortality data were extremely sparse and generally represent hospital-based deaths only. Using an overall case-fatality rate of 10%, we reach a tentative estimate of 20,000 to 40,000 leishmaniasis deaths per year. Although the information is very poor in a number of countries, this is the first in-depth exercise to better estimate the real impact of leishmaniasis. These data should help to define control strategies and reinforce leishmaniasis advocacy.     

Effects of aminoethylation of cysteine residues on the structural and functional activities of the Escherichia coli 30 S ribosomal proteins

The purified 30 S ribosomal proteins from Escherichia coli strain Q13 were chemically modified by reaction with ethyleneimine, specifically converting cysteine residues to S-2-aminoethylcysteine residues. Proteins S1, S2, S4, S8, S11, S12, S13, S14, S17, S18 and S21 were found to contain aminoethylcysteine residues after modification, whereas proteins S3, S5, S6, S7, S9, S10, S15, S16, S19 and S20 did not. Aminoethylated proteins S4, S13, S17 and S18 were active in the reconstitution of 30 S ribosomes and did not have altered functional activities in poly(U)-dependent polyphenylalanine synthesis, R17-dependent protein synthesis, fMet-tRNA binding and Phe-tRNA binding. Aminoethylated proteins S2, S11, S12, S14 and S21 were not active in the reconstitution of complete 30 S ribosomes, either because the aminoethylated protein did not bind stably to the ribosome (S2, S11, S12 and S21) or because the aminoethylated protein did not stabilize the binding of other ribosomal proteins (S14). The functional activities of 30 S ribosomes reconstituted from a mixture of proteins containing one sensitive aminoethylated protein (S2, S11, S12, S14 or S21) were similar to ribosomes reconstituted from mixtures lacking that protein. These results imply that the sulfhydryl groups of the proteins S4, S13, S17 and S18 are not necessary for the structural or functional activities of these proteins, and that aminoethylation of the sulfhydryl groups of S2, S11, S12, S14 and S21 forms either a kinetic or thermodynamic barrier to the assembly of active 30 S ribosomes in vitro.     

Contacts of ribosomal proteins with tRNAPhe and 16S RNA in analogs of the 30S initiation complex

Direct RNA-protein contacts have been studied by means of ultraviolet-induced (254 nm) cross-links inside complexes of NAcPhe-tRNAPhe, Phe-tRNAPhe and deacylated tRNAPhe with poly(U)-charged 30S subunit of Escherichia coli ribosome. In the first two complexes tRNA directly contacts with the similar sets of proteins (S4, S5, S7, S9/S11; S6 and S8 are found only in the second complex). These sets are similar to that in the fMet-tRNAfMet X 30S X mRNA complex, evidencing similar disposition of tRNAs in these three complexes. 16S RNA contacts in free 30S subunit mainly with proteins S4, S7 and S9/S11. In both complexes, containing NAcPhe-tRNAPhe and Phe-tRNAPhe, 16S RNA contacts with essentially the same proteins (S4, S5, S7, S8, S9/S11, S10, S15, S16 and S17) and in the same ratio, evidencing similar conformation of 30S subunit in these two complexes. In the third complex deacylated tRNAPhe contacts with proteins S4, S5, S6, S8, S9/S11 and S15, 16S RNA-protein interaction differs from those in the first two complexes by a remarkable decrease of cross-linked proteins S8, and S9/S11 and by the appearance of a large amount of cross-linked proteins(s) S13/S14. Hence, this complex differs from the first two by conformation of 30S subunit and, probably, by disposition and/or conformation of tRNA.     

Central domain assembly: thermodynamics and kinetics of S6 and S18 binding to an S15-RNA complex

The 30 S ribosomal subunit assembles in vitro through the hierarchical binding of 21 ribosomal proteins to 16 S rRNA. The central domain of 16 S rRNA becomes the platform of the 30 S subunit upon binding of ribosomal proteins S6, S8, S11, S15, S18 and S21. The assembly of the platform is nucleated by binding of S15 to 16 S rRNA, followed by the cooperative binding of S6 and S18. The prior binding of S6 and S18 is required for binding of S11 and S21. We have studied the mechanism of the cooperative binding of S6 and S18 to the S15-rRNA complex by isothermal titration calorimetry and gel mobility shift assays with rRNA and proteins from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex aeolicus. S6 and S18 form a stable heterodimer in solution with an apparent dissociation constant of 8.7 nM at 40 degrees C. The S6:S18 heterodimer binds to the S15-rRNA complex with an equilibrium dissociation constant of 2.7 nM at 40 degrees C. Consistent with previous studies using rRNA and proteins from Escherichia coli, we observed no binding of S6 or S18 in the absence of the other protein or S15. The presence of S15 increases the affinity of S6:S18 for the RNA by at least four orders of magnitude. The kinetics of S6:S18 binding to the S15-rRNA complex are slow, with an apparent bimolecular rate constant of 8.0 x 10(4) M(-1) s(-1) and an apparent unimolecular dissociation rate of 1.6 x 10(-4) s(-1). These results, which are consistent with a model in which S6 and S18 bind as a heterodimer to the S15-rRNA complex, provide a mechanistic framework to describe the previously observed S15-mediated cooperative binding of S6 and S18 in the ordered assembly of a multi-protein ribonucleoprotein complex.     

Determination of S-genotypes of pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) cultivars by S-RNase sequencing and PCR-RFLP analyses

The pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) has gametophytic self-incompatibility (GSI). To elucidate the S-genotypes of Korean-bred pear cultivars, whose parents are heterozygotes, the PCR amplification using S-RNase primers that are specific for each S-genotype was carried out in 15 Korean-bred pear cultivars and 5 Japanese-bred pear cultivars. The difference of the fragment length was shown in the following order: S6 (355 bp) < S7 (360 bp) < S1 (375 bp) < S4 (376 bp) < S3 and S5 (384 bp) < S8 (442 bp) < S9 (1,323 bp) < S2 (1,355 bp). We analyzed the sequence of the S-RNase gene, which had introns of various sizes in the hypervariable (HV) region between the adjacent exons with a fairly high homology. The sizes of the introns were as follows: S1 = 167 bp, S2 = 1,153 bp, S3 = 179 bp, S4 = 168 bp, S5 = 179 bp, S6 = 147 bp, S7 = 152 bp, S8 = 234 bp, S9 = 1,115 bp. There were five conservative and five hypervariable regions in the introns of S1, S3, S4, S5, S6 and S-RNases. A pairwise comparison of these introns of S-RNases revealed homologies as follows: 93.7% between S1- and S4-RNases, 93.3% between S3- and S5-RNases and 78.9% between S6- and S7-RNases. PCR-RFLP and S-RNases sequencing determined the S-genotypes of the pear cultivars. The S-genotypes were S4S9 for Shinkou, S3S9 for Niitaka, S3S5 for Housui, S1S5 for Kimizukawase, S1S8 for Ichiharawase, S3S5 for Mansoo, S3S4 for Shinil, S3S4 for Whangkeumbae, S3S5 for Sunhwang, S3S5 for Whasan, S3S5 for Mihwang, S5S? for Chengsilri, S3S5 for Gamro, S3S4 for Yeongsanbae, S3S4 for Wonhwang, S3S5 for Gamcheonbae, S3S5 for Danbae, S3S4 for Manpoong, S3S4 for Soowhangbae and S4S6 for Chuwhangbae. The information on the S-genotypes of pear cultivars will be used for the pollinizer selection and breeding program.     

A Comparison of the Native and Derived 30S and 50S Ribosomes of Escherichia coli

Four types of ribosomes occurring in E. coli have been separated by sucrose gradient centrifugation. These are the 30S and 50S particles occurring in E. coli extracts (native particles), and the 30S and 50S particles which are the subunits of 70S ribosomes (derived particles). Two criteria were used in comparing these particles: (1) The type of RNA contained in each, as determined by sedimentation velocity in the analytical ultracentrifuge. (2) The ability of mixtures of 30S and 50S ribosomes (derived 30S + derived 50S, native 30S + native 50S) to undergo the reaction: [Formula: see text] Native and derived 30S particles were found to contain 16S RNA. Derived 50S particles contained 23S RNA and a small amount of 15 to 20S RNA, whereas native 50S ribosomes contained only 16S RNA. Derived 30S and 50S particles combined to form 70S particles. However, under identical conditions, native 30S and 50S particles did not form 70S ribosomes.     

Assembly of the central domain of the 30S ribosomal subunit: roles for the primary binding ribosomal proteins S15 and S8

Assembly of the 30S ribosomal subunit occurs in a highly ordered and sequential manner. The ordered addition of ribosomal proteins to the growing ribonucleoprotein particle is initiated by the association of primary binding proteins. These proteins bind specifically and independently to 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA). Two primary binding proteins, S8 and S15, interact exclusively with the central domain of 16S rRNA. Binding of S15 to the central domain results in a conformational change in the RNA and is followed by the ordered assembly of the S6/S18 dimer, S11 and finally S21 to form the platform of the 30S subunit. In contrast, S8 is not part of this major platform assembly branch. Of the remaining central domain binding proteins, only S21 association is slightly dependent on S8. Thus, although S8 is a primary binding protein that extensively contacts the central domain, its role in assembly of this domain remains unclear. Here, we used directed hydroxyl radical probing from four unique positions on S15 to assess organization of the central domain of 16S rRNA as a consequence of S8 association. Hydroxyl radical probing of Fe(II)-S15/16S rRNA and Fe(II)-S15/S8/16S rRNA ribonucleoprotein particles reveal changes in the 16S rRNA environment of S15 upon addition of S8. These changes occur predominantly in helices 24 and 26 near previously identified S8 binding sites. These S8-dependent conformational changes are consistent with 16S rRNA folding in complete 30S subunits. Thus, while S8 binding is not absolutely required for assembly of the platform, it appears to affect significantly the 16S rRNA environment of S15 by influencing central domain organization.     

Interaction of ribosomal proteins S6, S8, S15 and S18 with the central domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA from Escherichia coli

The co-operative interaction of 30 S ribosomal subunit proteins S6, S8, S15 and S18 with 16 S ribosomal RNA from Escherichia coli was studied by (1) determining how the binding of each protein is influenced by the others and (2) characterizing a series of protein-rRNA fragment complexes. Whereas S8 and S15 are known to associate independently with the 16 S rRNA, binding of S18 depended upon S8 and S15, and binding of S6 was found to require S8, S15 and S18. Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) fragments were derived from the S8-, S8/S15- and S6/S8/S15/S18-16 S rRNA complexes by partial RNase hydrolysis and isolated by electrophoresis through Mg2+-containing polyacrylamide gels or by centrifugation through sucrose gradients. Identification of the proteins associated with each RNP by gel electrophoresis in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate demonstrated the presence of S8, S8 + S15 and S6 + S8 + S15 + S18 in the corresponding fragment complexes. Analysis of the rRNA components of the RNP particles confirmed that S8 was bound to nucleotides 583 to 605 and 624 to 653, and that S8 and S15 were associated with nucleotides 583 to 605, 624 to 672 and 733 to 757. Proteins S6, S8, S15 and S18 were shown to protect nucleotides 563 to 605, 624 to 680, 702 to 770, 818 to 839 and 844 to 891, which span the entire central domain of the 16 S rRNA molecule (nucleotides 560 to 890). The binding site for each protein contains helical elements as well as single-stranded internal loops ranging in size from a single bulged nucleotide to 20 bases. Three terminal loops and one stem-loop structure within the central domain of the 16 S rRNA were not protected in the four-protein complex. Interestingly, bases within or very close to these unprotected regions have been shown to be accessible to chemical and enzymatic probes in 30 S subunits but not in 70 S ribosomes. Furthermore, nucleotides adjacent to one of the unprotected loops have been cross-linked to a region near the 3' end of 16 S rRNA. Our observations and those of others suggest that the bases in this domain that are not sequestered by interactions with S6, S8, S15 or S18 play a role involved in subunit association or in tertiary interactions between portions of the rRNA chain that are distant from one-another in the primary structure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Binding of 16S rRNA to chloroplast 30S ribosomal proteins blotted on nitrocellulose

Protein-RNA associations were studied by a method using proteins blotted on a nitrocellulose sheet. This method was assayed with Escherichia Coli 30S ribosomal components. In stringent conditions (300 mM NaCl or 20° C) only 9 E. coli ribosomal proteins strongly bound to the 16S rRNA: S4, S5, S7, S9, S12, S13, S14, S19, S20. 8 of these proteins have been previously found to bind independently to the 16S rRNA. The same method was applied to determine protein-RNA interactions in spinach chloroplast 30S ribosomal subunits. A set of only 7 proteins was bound to chloroplast rRNA in stringent conditions: chloroplast S6, S10, S11, S14, S15, S17 and S22. They also bound to E. coli 16S rRNA. This set includes 4 chloroplast-synthesized proteins: S6, S11, S15 and S22. The core particles obtained after treatment by LiCl of chloroplast 30S ribosomal subunit contained 3 proteins (S6, S10 and S14) which are included in the set of 7 binding proteins. This set of proteins probably play a part in the early steps of the assembly of the chloroplast 30S ribosomal subunit.     

Structural motifs of the bacterial ribosomal proteins S20, S18 and S16 that contact rRNA present in the eukaryotic ribosomal proteins S25, S26 and S27A,respectively

The majority of constitutive proteins in the bacterial 30S ribosomal subunit have orthologues in Eukarya and Archaea. The eukaryotic counterparts for the remainder (S6, S16, S18 and S20) have not been identified. We assumed that amino acid residues in the ribosomal proteins that contact rRNA are to be constrained in evolution and that the most highly conserved of them are those residues that are involved in forming the secondary protein structure. We aligned the sequences of the bacterial ribosomal proteins from the S20p, S18p and S16p families, which make multiple contacts with rRNA in the Thermus thermophilus 30S ribosomal subunit (in contrast to the S6p family), with the sequences of the unassigned eukaryotic small ribosomal subunit protein families. This made it possible to reveal that the conserved structural motifs of S20p, S18p and S16p that contact rRNA in the bacterial ribosome are present in the ribosomal proteins S25e, S26e and S27Ae, respectively. We suggest that ribosomal protein families S20p, S18p and S16p are homologous to the families S25e, S26e and S27Ae, respectively.     

Sequence and secondary structure of Drosophila melanogaster 5.8S and 2S rRNAs and of the processing site between them.

Drosophila melanogaster 5.8S and 2S rRNAs were end-labeled with 32p at either the 5' or 3' end and were sequenced. 5.8S rRNA is 123 nucleotides long and homologous to the 5' part of sequenced 5.8S molecules from other species. 2S rRNA is 30 nucleotides long and homologous to the 3' part of other 5.8S molecules. The 3' end of the 5.8S molecule is able to base-pair with the 5' end of the 2S rRNA to generate a helical region equivalent in position to the "GC-rich hairpin" found in all previously sequenced 5.8S molecules. Probing the structure of the labeled Drosophila 5.8S molecule with S1 nuclease in solution verifies its similarity to other 5.8S rRNAs. The 2S rRNA is shown to form a stable complex with both 5.8S and 26S rRNAs separately and together. 5.8S rRNA can also form either binary or ternary complexes with 2S and 26S rRNA. It is concluded that the 5.8S rRNA in Drosophila melanogaster is very similar both in sequence and structure to other 5.8 rRNAs but is split into two pieces, the 2S rRNA being the 3' part. 2S anchors the 5.8S and 26S rRNA. The order of the rRNA coding regions in the ribosomal DNA repeating unit is shown to be 18S - 5.8S - 2S - 26S. Direct sequencing of ribosomal DNA shows that the 5.8S and 2S regions are separated by a 28 nucleotide spacer which is A-T rich and is presumably removed by a specific processing event. A secondary structure model is proposed for the 26S-5.8S ternary complex and for the presumptive precursor molecule.     

Positions of proteins S14, S18 and S20 in the 30 S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli

A map of the 30 S ribosomal subunit is presented giving the positions of 15 of its 21 proteins. The components located in the map are S1, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10, S11, S12, S14, S15, S18 and S20.     

S100A6 and S100A11 are specific targets of the calcium- and zinc-binding S100B protein in vivo

In solution, S100B protein is a noncovalent homodimer composed of two subunits associated in an antiparallel manner. Upon calcium binding, the conformation of S100B changes dramatically, leading to the exposure of hydrophobic residues at the surface of S100B. The residues in the C-terminal domain of S100B encompassing Phe(87) and Phe(88) have been implicated in interaction with target proteins. In this study, we used two-hybrid technology to identify specific S100B target proteins. Using S100B as bait, we identify S100A6 and S100A11 as specific targets for S100B. S100A1, the closest homologue of S100B, is capable of interaction with S100B but does not interact with S100A6 or S100A11. S100B, S100A6, and S100A11 isoforms are co-regulated and co-localized in astrocytoma U373 cells. Furthermore, co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that Ca(2+)/Zn(2+) stabilizes S100B-S100A6 and S100B-S100A11 heterocomplexes. Deletion of the C-terminal domain or mutation of Phe(87) and Phe(88) residues has no effect on S100B homodimerization and heterodimerization with S100A1 but drastically decreases interaction between S100B and S100A6 or S100A11. Our data suggest that the interaction between S100B and S100A6 or S100A11 should not be viewed as a typical S100 heterodimerization but rather as a model of interaction between S100B and target proteins.     

Probing the assembly of the 3' major domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA. Quaternary interactions involving ribosomal proteins S7, S9 and S19

We have studied the effect of assembly of ribosomal proteins S7, S9 and S19 on the accessibility and conformation of nucleotides in 16 S ribosomal RNA. Complexes formed between 16 S rRNA and S7, S7 + S9, S7 + S19 or S7 + S9 + S19 were subjected to a combination of chemical and enzymatic probes, whose sites of attack in 16 S rRNA were identified by primer extension. The results of this study show that: (1) Protein S7 affects the reactivity of an extensive region in the lower half of the 3' major domain. Inclusion of proteins S9 or S19 with S7 has generally little additional effect on S7-specific protection of the RNA. Clusters of nucleotides that are protected by protein S7 are localized in the 935-945 region, the 950/1230 stem, the 1250/1285 internal loop, and the 1350/1370 stem. (2) Addition of protein S9 in the presence of S7 causes several additional effects principally in two structurally distal regions. We observe strong S9-dependent protection of positions 1278 to 1283, and of several positions in the 1125/1145 internal loop. These findings suggest that interaction of protein S9 with 16 S rRNA results in a structure in which the 1125/1145 and 1280 regions are proximal to each other. (3) Most of the strong S19-dependent effects are clustered in the 950-1050 and 1210-1230 regions, which are joined by base-pairing in the 16 S rRNA secondary structure. The highly conserved 960-975 stemp-loop, which has been implicated in tRNA binding, appears to be destabilized in the presence of S19. (4) Protein S7 causes enhanced reactivity at several sites that become protected upon addition of S9 or S19. This suggests that S7-induced conformational changes in 16 S rRNA play a role in the co-operativity of assembly of the 3' major domain.     

Immunoprecipitation of 70S, 50S and 30S ribosomes ofEscherichia coli

Antibodies were raised in rabbits against 70S ribosomes, 50S and 30S ribosomal subunits individually. Purified immunoglobulins from the antiserum against each of the above ribosomal entities were tested for their capabilities of precipitating 70S, 50S and 30S ribosomes. The observations revealed the following: (i) The antiserum (IgG) raised against 70S ribosomes precipitates 70S ribosomes completely, while partial precipitation is seen with the subunits, the extent of precipitation being more with the 50S subunits than with 30S subunits; addition of 50S subunits to the 30S subunits facilitates the precipitation of 30S subunits by the antibody against 70S ribosomes. (ii) Antiserum against 50S subunits has the ability to immunoprecipitate both 50S and 70S ribosomes to an equal extent. (iii) Antiserum against 30S subunits also has the property of precipitating both 30S and 70S ribosomes. The differences in the structural organisation of the two subunits may account for the differences in their immunoprecipitability.     

Efficient reconstitution of functional Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunits from a complete set of recombinant small subunit ribosomal proteins.

Previous studies have shown that the 30S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli can be reconstituted in vitro from individually purified ribosomal proteins and 16S ribosomal RNA, which were isolated from natural 30S subunits. We have developed a 30S subunit reconstitution system that uses only recombinant ribosomal protein components. The genes encoding E. coli ribosomal proteins S2-S21 were cloned, and all twenty of the individual proteins were overexpressed and purified. Reconstitution, following standard procedures, using the complete set of recombinant proteins and purified 16S ribosomal RNA is highly inefficient. Efficient reconstitution of 30S subunits using these components requires sequential addition of proteins, following either the 30S subunit assembly map (Mizushima & Nomura, 1970, Nature 226:1214-1218; Held et al., 1974, J Biol Chem 249:3103-3111) or following the order of protein assembly predicted from in vitro assembly kinetics (Powers et al., 1993, J MoI Biol 232:362-374). In the first procedure, the proteins were divided into three groups, Group I (S4, S7, S8, S15, S17, and S20), Group II (S5, S6, S9, Sll, S12, S13, S16, S18, and S19), and Group III (S2, S3, S10, S14, and S21), which were sequentially added to 16S rRNA with a 20 min incubation at 42 degrees C following the addition of each group. In the second procedure, the proteins were divided into Group I (S4, S6, S11, S15, S16, S17, S18, and S20), Group II (S7, S8, S9, S13, and S19), Group II' (S5 and S12) and Group III (S2, S3, S10, S14, and S21). Similarly efficient reconstitution is observed whether the proteins are grouped according to the assembly map or according to the results of in vitro 30S subunit assembly kinetics. Although reconstitution of 30S subunits using the recombinant proteins is slightly less efficient than reconstitution using a mixture of total proteins isolated from 30S subunits, it is much more efficient than reconstitution using proteins that were individually isolated from ribosomes. Particles reconstituted from the recombinant proteins sediment at 30S in sucrose gradients, bind tRNA in a template-dependent manner, and associate with 50S subunits to form 70S ribosomes that are active in poly(U)-directed polyphenylalanine synthesis. Both the protein composition and the dimethyl sulfate modification pattern of 16S ribosomal RNA are similar for 30S subunits reconstituted with either recombinant proteins or proteins isolated as a mixture from ribosomal subunits as well as for natural 30S subunits.     

The small subunit of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome. Identification of the full complement of ribosomal proteins present

Identification of all the protein components of the small subunit (28 S) of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome has been achieved by carrying out proteolytic digestions of whole 28 S subunits followed by analysis of the resultant peptides by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Peptide sequence information was used to search the human EST data bases and complete coding sequences of the proteins were assembled. The human mitochondrial ribosome has 29 distinct proteins in the small subunit. Fourteen of this group of proteins are homologs of the Escherichia coli 30 S ribosomal proteins S2, S5, S6, S7, S9, S10, S11, S12, S14, S15, S16, S17, S18, and S21. All of these proteins have homologs in Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondrial ribosomes. Surprisingly, three variants of ribosomal protein S18 are found in the mammalian and D. melanogaster mitochondrial ribosomes while C. elegans has two S18 homologs. The S18 homologs tend to be more closely related to chloroplast S18s than to prokaryotic S18s. No mitochondrial homologs to prokaryotic ribosomal proteins S1, S3, S4, S8, S13, S19, and S20 could be found in the peptides obtained from the whole 28 S subunit digests or by analysis of the available data bases. The remaining 15 proteins present in mammalian mitochondrial 28 S subunits (MRP-S22 through MRP-S36) are specific to mitochondrial ribosomes. Proteins in this group have no apparent homologs in bacterial, chloroplast, archaebacterial, or cytosolic ribosomes. All but two of these proteins have a clear homolog in D. melanogaster while all but three can be found in the genome of C. elegans. Five of the mitochondrial specific ribosomal proteins have homologs in S. cerevisiae.     

Assembly of the 30S ribosomal subunit: positioning ribosomal protein S13 in the S7 assembly branch

Studies of Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunit assembly have revealed a hierarchical and cooperative association of ribosomal proteins with 16S ribosomal RNA; these results have been used to compile an in vitro 30S subunit assembly map. In single protein addition and omission studies, ribosomal protein S13 was shown to be dependent on the prior association of ribosomal protein S20 for binding to the ribonucleoprotein particle. While the overwhelming majority of interactions revealed in the assembly map are consistent with additional data, the dependency of S13 on S20 is not. Structural studies position S13 in the head of the 30S subunit > 100 A away from S20, which resides near the bottom of the body of the 30S subunit. All of the proteins that reside in the head of the 30S subunit, except S13, have been shown to be part of the S7 assembly branch, that is, they all depend on S7 for association with the assembling 30S subunit. Given these observations, the assembly requirements for S13 were investigated using base-specific chemical footprinting and primer extension analysis. These studies reveal that S13 can bind to 16S rRNA in the presence of S7, but not S20. Additionally, interaction between S13 and other members of the S7 assembly branch have been observed. These results link S13 to the 3' major domain family of proteins, and the S7 assembly branch, placing S13 in a new location in the 30S subunit assembly map where its position is in accordance with much biochemical and structural data.     

RNase catalyzed hydrolysis of ribosomes in several functional states

The RNase A catalyzed hydrolysis of rRNA in ribosomes has been studied for nonwashed 50S and 70S ribosomes, for washed 50S and 70S ribosomes, for runoff 50S ribosomes and for 70S ribosomes in polysomes. The regions available to hydrolysis in the 50S ribosome remain available when the 50S ribosomes become a part of a 70S ribosome or a polysome. The regions available to hydrolysis in the 30S ribosome become unavailable when the 30S ribosome becomes part of a 70S ribosome or a polysome. Removal of tRNA, mRNA and factors from the 50S and 70S ribosome lowers the rate of hydrolysis of one site in the 23S rRNA. This shows that the conformation of one region of the 23S RNA changes for ribosomes in different functional states.     

The distance between S1, S21, and the 3' end of 16S RNA in 30S ribosomal subunits. The effect of poly(uridylic acid) and 50S subunits on these distances

The apparent distances between probes covalently attached to the cysteine thiols of S1 or S21 and the 3' end of 16S RNA in Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunits were determined by non-radiative energy transfer to be: S21-16S RNA, 5.1 nm; S21-S1, 6.9 nm; S1-16S RNA, 6.8 nm. Binding of poly(uridylic acid) to 30S subunits causes the apparent distances between S1 and 16S RNA or S21 and 16S RNA to increase by more than 1.2 nm and 0.5 nm, respectively, but has little or no effect on the S1-S21 distance. Binding of 50S subunits causes an apparent increase in the S21-16S RNA and S21-S1 distances by 1.0 nm and 0.8 nm, respectively, but has little or no effect on the S1-16S-RNA distance.