A neutral‐niche theory of nestedness in mutualistic networks

Recently, there has been a vigorous interest in community ecology about the structure of mutualistic networks and its importance for species persistence and coevolution. However, the mechanisms shaping mutualistic networks have been rarely explored. Here we extend for the first time the neutral theory of biodiversity to a multi trophic system. We focus on nestedness, a distinctive pattern of mutualistic community assembly showing two characteristics, namely, asymmetrical specialization (specialists interacting with generalists) and a generalist core (generalists interacting with generalists). We investigate the importance of relative species abundance (RSA) for the nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Our results show that neutral mutualistic communities give rise to networks considerably more nested than real communities. RSA explains 60–70% of nested patterns in two real communities studied here, while 30–40% of nestedness is still unexplained. The nested pattern in real communities is better explained when we introduce interaction‐specific species traits such as forbidden links and intensity of dependence (relative importance of fruits for the diet of a frugivore) in our analysis. The fact that neutral mutualistic communities exhibit a perfectly nested structure and do not show a random or compartmentalized structure, underlines the importance of RSA in the assembly of mutualistic networks.     

Historical climate‐change influences modularity and nestedness of pollination networks

The structure of species interaction networks is important for species coexistence, community stability and exposure of species to extinctions. Two widespread structures in ecological networks are modularity, i.e. weakly connected subgroups of species that are internally highly interlinked, and nestedness, i.e. specialist species that interact with a subset of those species with which generalist species also interact. Modularity and nestedness are often interpreted as evolutionary ecological structures that may have relevance for community persistence and resilience against perturbations, such as climate‐change. Therefore, historical climatic fluctuations could influence modularity and nestedness, but this possibility remains untested. This lack of research is in sharp contrast to the considerable efforts to disentangle the role of historical climate‐change and contemporary climate on species distributions, richness and community composition patterns. Here, we use a global database of pollination networks to show that historical climate‐change is at least as important as contemporary climate in shaping modularity and nestedness of pollination networks. Specifically, on the mainland we found a relatively strong negative association between Quaternary climate‐change and modularity, whereas nestedness was most prominent in areas having experienced high Quaternary climate‐change. On islands, Quaternary climate‐change had weak effects on modularity and no effects on nestedness. Hence, for both modularity and nestedness, historical climate‐change has left imprints on the network structure of mainland communities, but had comparably little effect on island communities. Our findings highlight a need to integrate historical climate fluctuations into eco‐evolutionary hypotheses of network structures, such as modularity and nestedness, and then test these against empirical data. We propose that historical climate‐change may have left imprints in the structural organisation of species interactions in an array of systems important for maintaining biological diversity.     

菌根共生网络嵌套性判定的零模型选择

零模型是判定网络嵌套性的重要依据, 菌根共生关系网络经常出现高度非对称性, 该文通过探究矩阵非对称变化对基于不同零模型构建方法的网络嵌套性的影响, 试图为非对称网络零模型的选择提供依据。结果表明: 不同零模型保守性不同, 增加限定条件减少零模型构建过程中的自由空间, 高度限定条件易导致第II类错误。高度非对称网络会增加基于完全随机(r00)零模型的矩阵温度(NT)偏离、降低配对重叠度(NODF)偏离, 标准化指数z-score值显示网络非对称增加后有助于NT和NODF显著性判定。行或列限定对非对称网络嵌套性判定的影响存在差异, 列限定(c0)的网络嵌套性判定对网络非对称性变化的响应规律与r00零模型的响应趋势基本一致, 具有更低的嵌套性偏离和标准差值。行限定(r0, 包括行列限定(backtrack))零模型NT值和NT偏移随矩阵非对称性的变化保持稳定, 较之c0零模型在高度非对称网络中呈现更低的NODF偏离值。选用完全随机和限定零模型相结合的方法, 有助于更加准确判断非对称网络是否具有嵌套结构。高度非对称网络嵌套性判定中对行属性特征比较敏感, 不同非对称性网络间嵌套性水平相比较时选用r0零模型要优于r00和c0零模型。     

Fish larvae-environment networks: co-occurrence patterns,nestedness and robustness of reproductive guilds

Hydrobiologia - We assessed the importance of different types of riverine environments (river channels, tributaries, and floodplain lagoons) for the early development of fish larvae from different...     

Protein interaction networks

The study of protein interactions is playing an ever increasing role in our attempts to understand cells and diseases on a system-wide level. This article reviews several experimental approaches that are currently being used to measure protein-protein, protein-DNA and gene-gene interactions. These techniques have now been scaled up to produce extensive genome-wide data sets that are providing us with a first glimpse of global interaction networks. Complementing these experimental approaches, several computational methodologies to predict protein interactions are also reviewed. Existing databases that serve as repositories for protein interaction information and how such databases are used to analyze high-throughput data from a pathway perspective is also addressed. Finally, current efforts to combine multiple data types to obtain more accurate and comprehensive models of protein interactions are discussed. It is clear that the evolution of these experimental and computational approaches is rapidly changing our view of biology, and promises to provide us with an unprecedented ability to model cells and organisms at a system-wide level.     

Discovering functional interaction patterns in protein-protein interaction networks

Background  

In recent years, a considerable amount of research effort has been directed to the analysis of biological networks with the availability of genome-scale networks of genes and/or proteins of an increasing number of organisms. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network is a particular biological network which represents physical interactions between pairs of proteins of an organism. Major research on PPI networks has focused on understanding the topological organization of PPI networks, evolution of PPI networks and identification of conserved subnetworks across different species, discovery of modules of interaction, use of PPI networks for functional annotation of uncharacterized proteins, and improvement of the accuracy of currently available networks.     

The relationship between species replacement,dissimilarity derived from nestedness,and nestedness

Aim Beta diversity can be partitioned into two components: dissimilarity due to species replacement and dissimilarity due to nestedness ( Baselga, 2010 , Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19 , 134–143). Several contributions have challenged this approach or proposed alternative frameworks. Here, I review the concepts and methods used in these recent contributions, with the aim of clarifying: (1) the rationale behind the partitioning of beta diversity into species replacement and nestedness‐resultant dissimilarity, (2) how, based on this rationale, numerators and denominators of indices have to match, and (3) how nestedness and nestedness‐resultant dissimilarity are related but different concepts. Innovation The rationale behind measures of species replacement (turnover) dictates that the number of species that are replaced between sites (numerator of the index) has to be relativized with respect to the total number of species that could potentially be replaced (denominator). However, a recently proposed partition of Jaccard dissimilarity fails to do this. In consequence, this partition underestimates the contribution of species replacement and overestimates the contribution of richness differences to total dissimilarity. I show how Jaccard dissimilarity can be partitioned into meaningful turnover and nestedness components, and extend these new indices to multiple‐site situations. Finally the concepts of nestedness and nestedness‐resultant dissimilarity are discussed. Main conclusions Nestedness should be assessed using consistent measures that depend both on paired overlap and matrix filling, e.g. NODF, whereas beta‐diversity patterns should be examined using measures that allow the total dissimilarity to be separated into the components of dissimilarity due to species replacement and dissimilarity due to nestedness. In the case of multiple‐site dissimilarity patterns, averaged pairwise indices should never be used because the mean of the pairwise values is unable to accurately reflect the multiple‐site attributes of dissimilarity.     

Protein interaction networks in plants

Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to virtually every aspect of cellular functions. With the development of high-throughput technologies of both the yeast two-hybrid system and tandem mass spectrometry, genome-wide protein-linkage mapping has become a major objective in post-genomic research. While at least partial “interactome” networks of several model organisms are already available, in the plant field, progress in this respect is slow. However, even with comprehensive protein interaction data still missing, substantial recent advance in the graph-theoretical functional interpretation of complex network architectures might pave the way for novel approaches in plant research. This article reviews current progress and discussions in network biology. Emphasis is put on the question of what can be learned about protein functions and cellular processes by studying the topology of complex protein interaction networks and the evolutionary mechanisms underlying their development. Particularly the intermediate and local levels of network organization—the modules, motifs and cliques—are increasingly recognized as the operational units of biological functions. As demonstrated by some recent results from systematic analyses of plant protein families, protein interaction networks promise to be a valuable tool for a molecular understanding of functional specificities and for identifying novel regulatory components and pathways.     

Protein interaction networks in bacteria

The complement of expressed cellular proteins - the proteome - is organized into functional, structured networks of protein interactions that mediate assembly of molecular machines and dynamic cellular pathways. Recent studies reveal the biological roles of protein interactions in bacteriophage T7 and Helicobacter pylori, and new methods allow to compare and to predict interaction networks in other species. Smaller scale networks provide biological insights into DNA replication and chromosome dynamics in Bacillus subtilis and Archeoglobus fulgidus, and into the assembly of multiprotein complexes such as the type IV secretion system of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and the cell division machinery of Escherichia coli. Genome-wide interaction networks in several species are needed to obtain a biologically meaningful view of the higher order organization of the proteome in bacteria.     

Glycosaminoglycan interaction networks and databases

Glycosaminoglycans are complex polysaccharides exhibiting a large structural and conformational diversity. These key biological players organize the extracellular matrix, contribute to cell–matrix interactions, and regulate cell signaling. Natural and synthetic libraries of glycosaminoglycans have been spotted on microarrays to find glycosaminoglycan partners and determine the size and the chemical groups promoting protein binding. Advances in glycosaminoglycan sequencing allow the characterization of glycosaminoglycan sequences interacting with proteins, and glycosaminoglycan-mediated pull-down proteomics can identify glycosaminoglycan-binding proteins at a proteome scale in various biological samples. The analysis of the glycosaminoglycan interaction networks generated using these data gives insights into the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying glycosaminoglycan functions. These interactomes can also be used to design inhibitors targeting specific GAG interactions for therapeutic purpose.     

Antagonism and bistability in protein interaction networks

A protein interaction network (PIN) is a set of proteins that modulate one another's activities by regulated synthesis and degradation, by reversible binding to form complexes, and by catalytic reactions (e.g., phosphorylation and dephosphorylation). Most PINs are so complex that their dynamical characteristics cannot be deduced accurately by intuitive reasoning alone. To predict the properties of such networks, many research groups have turned to mathematical models (differential equations based on standard biochemical rate laws, e.g., mass-action, Michaelis-Menten, Hill). When using Michaelis-Menten rate expressions to model PINs, care must be exercised to avoid making inconsistent assumptions about enzyme-substrate complexes. We show that an appealingly simple model of a PIN that functions as a bistable switch is compromised by neglecting enzyme-substrate intermediates. When the neglected intermediates are put back into the model, bistability of the switch is lost. The theory of chemical reaction networks predicts that bistability can be recovered by adding specific reaction channels to the molecular mechanism. We explore two very different routes to recover bistability. In both cases, we show how to convert the original 'phenomenological' model into a consistent set of mass-action rate laws that retains the desired bistability properties. Once an equivalent model is formulated in terms of elementary chemical reactions, it can be simulated accurately either by deterministic differential equations or by Gillespie's stochastic simulation algorithm.     

Protein interaction networks in medicine and disease

The physical interaction of proteins is subject to intense investigation that has revealed that proteins are assembled into large densely connected networks. In this review, we will examine how signaling pathways can be combined to form higher order protein interaction networks. By using network graph theory, these interaction networks can be further analyzed for global organization, which has revealed unique aspects of the relationships between protein networks and complex biological phenotypes. Moreover, several studies have shown that the structure and dynamics of protein networks are disturbed in complex diseases such as cancer progression. These relationships suggest a novel paradigm for treatment of complex multigenic disease where the protein interaction network is the target of therapy more so than individual molecules within the network.     

Analyzing protein-protein interaction networks

The advent of the "omics" era in biology research has brought new challenges and requires the development of novel strategies to answer previously intractable questions. Molecular interaction networks provide a framework to visualize cellular processes, but their complexity often makes their interpretation an overwhelming task. The inherently artificial nature of interaction detection methods and the incompleteness of currently available interaction maps call for a careful and well-informed utilization of this valuable data. In this tutorial, we aim to give an overview of the key aspects that any researcher needs to consider when working with molecular interaction data sets and we outline an example for interactome analysis. Using the molecular interaction database IntAct, the software platform Cytoscape, and its plugins BiNGO and clusterMaker, and taking as a starting point a list of proteins identified in a mass spectrometry-based proteomics experiment, we show how to build, visualize, and analyze a protein-protein interaction network.     

Functional coherence in domain interaction networks

MOTIVATION: Extracting functional information from protein-protein interactions (PPI) poses significant challenges arising from the noisy, incomplete, generic and static nature of data obtained from high-throughput screening. Typical proteins are composed of multiple domains, often regarded as their primary functional and structural units. Motivated by these considerations, domain-domain interactions (DDI) for network-based analyses have received significant recent attention. This article performs a formal comparative investigation of the relationship between functional coherence and topological proximity in PPI and DDI networks. Our investigation provides the necessary basis for continued and focused investigation of DDIs as abstractions for functional characterization and modularization of networks. RESULTS: We investigate the problem of assessing the functional coherence of two biomolecules (or segments thereof) in a formal framework. We establish essential attributes of admissible measures of functional coherence, and demonstrate that existing, well-accepted measures are ill-suited to comparative analyses involving different entities (i.e. domains versus proteins). We propose a statistically motivated functional similarity measure that takes into account functional specificity as well as the distribution of functional attributes across entity groups to assess functional similarity in a statistically meaningful and biologically interpretable manner. Results on diverse data, including high-throughput and computationally predicted PPIs, as well as structural and computationally inferred DDIs for different organisms show that: (i) the relationship between functional similarity and network proximity is captured in a much more (biologically) intuitive manner by our measure, compared to existing measures and (ii) network proximity and functional similarity are significantly more correlated in DDI networks than in PPI networks, and that structurally determined DDIs provide better functional relevance as compared to computationally inferred DDIs.