Evolution of the LINE-like I element in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup

LINE-like retrotransposons, the so-called I elements, control the system of I-R (inducer-reactive) hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. I elements are present in many Drosophila species. It has been suggested that active, complete I elements, located at different sites on the chromosomes, invaded natural populations of D. melanogaster recently (1920–1970). But old strains lacking active I elements have only defective I elements located in the chromocenter. We have cloned I elements from D. melanogaster and the melanogaster subgroup. In D. melanogaster, the nucleotide sequences of chromocentral I elements differed from those on chromosome arms by as much as 7%. All the I elements of D. mauritiana and D. sechellia are more closely related to the chromosomal I elements of D. melanogaster than to the chromocentral I elements in any species. No sequence difference was observed in the surveyed region between two chromosomal I elements isolated from D. melanogaster and one from D. simulans. These findings strongly support the idea that the defective chromocentral I elements of D. melanogaster originated before the species diverged and the chromosomal I elements were eliminated. The chromosomal I elements reinvaded natural populations of D. melanogaster recently, and were possibly introduced from D. simulans by horizontal transmission.     

A comparative study of male meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster and D. virilis

Male meiosis in D. melanogaster cytologically follows the usual pattern, whereas in D. melanogaster and in D. virilis oocytes the chromosomes clump into a karyosphere at early meiotic prophase and remain so up to metaphase I.Male meiosis in D. virilis spermatocytes has an intermediate character: a part of the chromatin clumps together in a karyosphere at early prophase, whereas the other part of the chromatin remains diffuse all through prophase. At the end of prophase, the diffuse chromatin becomes integrated into the karyosphere before metaphase I. During the meiotic divisions the chromosomes have the same clumped aspect as those in Drosophila oocytes and thus differ strikingly from the dividing chromosomes in D. melanogaster spermatocytes.In D. virilis spermatocytes the nucleolus exhibits changes during the meiotic prophase that may be related to synthetical activities. The DNA specific staining with the fluorochrome DAPI reveals the existence of extrachromosomal DNA in the later prophase. Other striking differences in meiotic events between the two Drosophila species concern the centrioles and spermiogenesis.     

The sex-lethal gene homologue in Chrysomya rufifacies is highly conserved in sequence and exon-intron organization

A great variety of sex determination mechanisms exists in insect species. In Drosophila melanogaster sex is determined by the ratio between X chromosomes and autosomes, while in the blowfly Chrysomya rufifacies it is maternally determined. A cascade of genes which are involved in sex determination has been identified in D. melanogaster with the Sex-lethal gene (Sxl) as the key gene. We screened genomic libraries of C. rufifacies with a probe of the Sxl gene from D. melanogaster and isolated a genomic region that included most of the homologous gene. DNA- and protein-sequence comparison showed a high percent identity between the Chrysomya and the Drosophila gene. Up to 90% identity of the amino acid sequences was found in the region that contained the RNA-binding domains. The degree of identity is much lower outside of this functionally important region (18% identity). cDNA analysis showed a highly conserved exon-intron structure between the two species, although sex-specific splicing as used in D. melanogaster for the regulation of Sxl activity, could not be detected in C. rufifacies.     

Structural and genetic studies of the proliferation disrupter genes of Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster

To examine whether structural and functional differences exist in the proliferation disrupter (prod) genes between Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster, we analyzed and compared both genes. The exon–intron structure of the genes was found to be the same – three exons were interrupted by two introns, although a previous report suggested that only one intron existed in D. melanogaster. The prod genes of D. simulans and D. melanogaster both turn out to encode 346 amino acids, not 301 as previously reported for D. melanogaster. The numbers of nucleotide substitutions in the prod genes was 0.0747 ±  per synonymous site and 0.0116 ± 0.0039 per replacement site, both comparable to those previously known for homologous genes between D. simulans and D. melanogaster. Genetic analysis demonstrated that D. simulans PROD can compensate for a deficiency of D. melanogaster PROD in hybrids. The PRODs of D. simulans and D. melanogaster presumably share the same function and a conserved working mechanism. The prod gene showed no significant interaction with the lethality of the male hybrid between these species. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Identification of One Intron Loss and Phylogenetic Evolution of Dfak Gene in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Group

Intron loss and its evolutionary significance have been noted in Drosophila. The current study provides another example of intron loss within a single-copy Dfak gene in Drosophila. By using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), we amplified about 1.3 kb fragment spanning intron 5–10, located in the position of Tyr kinase (TyK) domain of Dfak gene from Drosophila melanogaster species group, and observed size difference among the amplified DNA fragments from different species. Further sequencing analysis revealed that D. melanogaster and D. simulans deleted an about 60 bp of DNA fragment relative to other 7 Drosophila species, such as D. elegans, D. ficusphila, D. biarmipes, D. takahashii, D. jambulina, D. prostipennis and D. pseudoobscura, and the deleted fragment located precisely in the position of one intron. The data suggested that intron loss might have occurred in the Dfak gene evolutionary process of D. melanogaster and D. simulans of Drosophila melanogaster species group. In addition, the constructed phylogenetic tree based on the Dfak TyK domains clearly revealed the evolutionary relationships between subgroups of Drosophila melanogaster species group, and the intron loss identified from D. melanogaster and D. simulans provides a unique diagnostic tool for taxonomic classification of the melanogaster subgroup from other group of genus Drosophila.     

Molecular cloning of mei-41, a gene that influences both somatic and germline chromosome metabolism of Drosophila melanogaster

The mei-41 gene of Drosophila melanogaster plays an essential role in meiosis, in the maintenance of somatic chromosome stability, in postreplication repair and in DNA double-strand break repair. This gene has been cytogenetically localized to polytene chromosome bands 14C4-6 using available chromosomal aberrations. About 60 kb of DNA sequence has been isolated following a bidirectional chromosomal walk that extends over the cytogenetic interval 14C1-6. The breakpoints of chromosomal aberrations identified within that walk establish that the entire mei-41 gene has been cloned. Two independently derived mei-41 mutants have been shown to carry P insertions within a single 2.2 kb fragment of the walk. Since revertants of those mutants have lost the P element sequences, an essential region of the mei-41 gene is present in that fragment. A 10.5 kb genomic fragment that spans the P insertion sites has been found to restore methyl methanesulfonate resistance and female fertility of the mei-41 ^D3 mutants. The results demonstrate that all the sequences required for the proper expression of the mei-41 gene are present on this genomic fragment. This study provides the foundation for molecular analysis of a function that is essential for chromosome stability in both the germline and somatic cells.This Paper is dedicated to the memory of Professor James B. Boyd     

Adaptation to a Starch Environment and Regulation of alpha-Amylase in Drosophila

The adaptation to glucose and starch foods insix species, D. melanogaster, D.virilis, D. saltans, D. funebris,D. levanonensis and D. americana, wasstudied by measuring productivity. D.melanogaster and D. virilis adapted more to thestarch environment than to the glucose environment,while D. saltans adapted more to the glucoseenvironment than to the starch environment. D.funebris, D. levanonensis, and D. americana did not distinctlyadapt to either environment. In addition, the regulationof amylase in the six species was investigated bymeasuring the levels of amylase activity with glucoseand starch food environments. The levels of amylaseactivity in D. levanonensis and D.saltans were substantially low, indicating thatthese species cannot utilize starch as a carbon source.The starch-adapted species, D. melanogaster and D.virilis, showed higher levels of amylase activitywith the starch environment and higher inducibility.These results suggest that changing the regulation ofamylase is important for the adaptation to a starch environment inDrosophila.     

A Genomic Comparison of Faster-Sex, Faster-X, and Faster-Male Evolution Between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura

A genomic comparison of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura provides a unique opportunity to investigate factors involved in sequence divergence. The chromosomal arrangements of these species include an autosomal segment in D. melanogaster which is homologous to part of the X chromosome in D. pseudoobscura. Using orthologues to calculate rates of nonsynonymous (d_N) substitutions, we found genes on the X chromosome to be significantly more diverged than those on the autosomes, but it is not true for segment 3L-XR which is autosomal in D. melanogaster (3L) and X-linked in D. pseudoobscura (XR). We also found that the median d_N values for genes having reproductive functions in either the male, the female, or both sexes are higher than those for sequences without reproductive function and even higher for sequences involved in male-specific function. These estimates of divergence for male sex-related sequences are most likely underestimates, as the very rapidly evolving reproductive genes would tend to lose homology sooner and thus not be included in the comparison of orthologues. We also noticed a high proportion of male reproductive genes among the othologous genes with the highest rates of d_N. Reproductive genes with and without an orthologue in D. pseudoobscura were compared among D. melanogaster, D. simulans, and D. yakuba and it was found that there were in fact higher rates of divergence in the group without a D. pseudoobscura orthologue. These results, from widely separated taxa, bolster the thesis that sexual system genes experience accelerated rates of change in comparison to nonsexual genes in evolution and speciation. [Reviewing Editor: Dr. Willie J. Swanson]     

Historical effective size and the level of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura

We report the results of a sequential gel electrophoretic study of protein variation in Drosophila melanogaster and its comparison with D. pseudoobscura. The number of alleles and mean heterozygosity were lower in D. melanogaster than in D. pseudoobscura. On the other hand, geographical populations of Drosophila melanogaster have been shown to be much more differentiated than those of D. pseudoobscura. The results suggest that in D. melanogaster low-frequency alleles have been lost during the colonization process and that major alleles have become differentiated among populations. Population bottlenecks, due to various causes, appear to have played a significant role in the shaping of genetic variation in natural populations of many species. It is proposed that a comparison of genetic variation at homologous gene loci between related species can bring out effects of historical bottlenecks and provide an alternative approach for analyzing causes of genetic variation in natural populations.We thank the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada for financial support (Grant A0235 to R.S.S.).     

The evolutionary genetics of thehobo transposable element in theDrosophila melanogaster complex

Hobo elements are a family of transposable elements found inDrosophila melanogaster and its three sibling species:D. simulans, D. mauritiana andD. sechellia. Studies inD. melanogaster have shown thathobo may be mobilized, and that the genetic effects of such mobilizations included the general features of hybrid dysgenesis: mutations, chromosomal rearrangements and gonadal dysgenis in F1 individuals. At the evolutionary level somehobo-hybridizing sequences have also been found in the other members of themelanogaster subgroup and in many members of the relatedmontium subgroup. Surveys of older collected strains ofD. melanogaster suggest that completehobo elements were absent prior to 50 years ago and that they have recently been introduced into this species by horizontal transfer. In this paper we review our findings and those of others, in order to precisely describe the geographical distribution and the evolutionary history ofhobo in theD. melanogaster complex. Studies of the DNA sequences reveal a different level of divergence between the groupD. melanogaster, D. simulans andD. mauritiana and the fourth speciesD. sechellia. The hypothesis of multiple transfers in the recent past into theD. melanogaster complex from a common outside source is discussed.     

Purification and characterization of diaphorases from someDrosophila species

Diaphorase-1 and diaphorase-2 were isolated from twoDrosophila species,D. virilis andD. melanogaster, and purified by gel filtration, affinity chromatography, immunoaffinity chromatography, and ion-exchange chromatography. The molecular weights of both enzymes were the same in each species. The molecular weight of diaphorase-1 was the same under both denaturating and nondenaturating conditions, close to 60,000, indicating a monomeric structure. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) electrophoresis of the purified diaphorase-2 revealed the presence of a single protein band of 55,000 Da, while the molecular weight of the native enzyme was found to be 67,000. The two diaphorases were further characterized by their pH optima, isoelectric points, and kinetic parameters, and antibodies were raised in rabbits against the purified enzymes fromD. virilis. The antibodies showed no cross-reactions but recognized the corresponding diaphorases inD. melanogaster andD. novamexicana as well asD. virilis. The data obtained confirmed the hypothesis of an independent genetic control of diaphorase-1 and diaphorase-2 inDrosophila.     

Identification and comparisons of the yolk polypeptides and the genes which code for them in D. melanogaster sibling species

Summary The yolk proteins stored in Drosophila, oocytes for utilisation during embryogenesis are an ideal system for studying the regulation of gene expression during development. The 3 major polypeptides found in yolk in D. melanogaster are synthesised in the fat body and ovarian follicle cells and selectively accumulated by the oocyte during vitellogenesis. In order to understand more about their regulation and the mechanism of uptake, studies on other species are necessary.Three yolk polypeptides have previously been identified in the D. melanogaster sibling species (D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. mauritiana, D. erecta, D. teissieri, D. orena and D. yakuba). In D. melanogaster three genes located on the X chromosome are known to code for these yolk polypeptides. in this study genomic Southern transfers and in situ hybridisation experiments were carried out on the sibling species. Using the three cloned yolk protein genes from D. melanogaster, homologous sequences could be detected in the sibling species. It is suggested that three yolk protein genes occur in each of these species, all being located on the X chromosome, and that two of the genes are very closely linked in these same species. Yolk protein gene-homologous DNA sequences have also been identified in two more distantly related species D. funebris and D. virilis.     

Molecular Phylogeny of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila melanogaster</Emphasis> Species Subgroup

Although molecular and phenotypic evolution have been studied extensively in Drosophila melanogaster and its close relatives, phylogenetic relationships within the D. melanogaster species subgroup remain unresolved. In particular, recent molecular studies have not converged on the branching orders of the D. yakuba–D. teissieri and D. erecta–D. orena species pairs relative to the D. melanogaster–D. simulans–D. mauritiana–D. sechellia species complex. Here, we reconstruct the phylogeny of the melanogaster species subgroup using DNA sequence data from four nuclear genes. We have employed vectorette PCR to obtain sequence data for orthologous regions of the Alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh), Alcohol dehydrogenase related (Adhr), Glucose dehydrogenase (Gld), and rosy (ry) genes (totaling 7164 bp) from six melanogaster subgroup species (D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. teissieri, D. yakuba, D. erecta, and D. orena) and three species from subgroups outside the melanogaster species subgroup [D. eugracilis (eugracilis subgroup), D. mimetica (suzukii subgroup), and D. lutescens (takahashii subgroup)]. Relationships within the D. simulans complex are not addressed. Phylogenetic analyses employing maximum parsimony, neighbor-joining, and maximum likelihood methods strongly support a D. yakuba–D. teissieri and D. erecta–D. orena clade within the melanogaster species subgroup. D. eugracilis is grouped closer to the melanogaster subgroup than a D. mimetica–D. lutescens clade. This tree topology is supported by reconstructions employing simple (single parameter) and more complex (nonreversible) substitution models. Present address (Ryan M. David): University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78284, USA     

Heterospecific combinations of germ cells and gonadal soma betweenDrosophila melanogaster,D. mauritiana andD. ananassae

Summary We transplanted pole cells betweenDrosophila melanogaster, D. mauritiana andD. ananassae to investigate the ability of germ cells to develop in the gonad of a heterospecific host, and to study the interaction between somatic follicle cells and the cells of the germ line in producing the species-specific chorion. FemaleD. mauritiana germ cells in aD. melanogaster ovary produced functional eggs with normal development potential. The same is true for the reciprocal combination. FemaleD. ananassae pole cells in aD. melanogaster host only developed to a very early stage and degenerated afterwards. None of the interspecific combinations of male pole cells led to functional sperm. We could not determine at what stage the transplanted male pole cells were arrested. The cooperation of follicle cells and the oocyte-nurse cell complex in producing the chorion was studied using the germ-line-dependent mutationfs(1) K10 ofD. melanogaster, which causes fused respiratory appendages and an abnormal chorion morphology. Wild-type femaleD. mauritiana germ cells in a mutantfs(1) K10 D. melanogaster ovary led to the production of wild-type eggs withD. melanogaster-specific, short respiratory appendages. On the other hand,D. melanogaster fs(1) K10 germ cells in aD. mauritiana ovary induced the formation of eggs with mutant fused appendages which were, however, typicallyD. mauritiana in length. When.D. mauritiana pole cells developed in aD. melanogaster ovary, the chorion exhibited a new imprint pattern that differs from both species-specific patterns.     

Comparative studies of allozyme loci in Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster. I. Three dipeptidase loci

Genetic variation at three dipeptidase loci (Dip-A, Dip-B, and Dip-C) in Drosophila simulans was analyzed by starch gel electrophoresis. Dip-A was found to be polymorphic in four populations, while Dip-B and Dip-C were found to be polymorphic in one. The numbers of different alleles found at each respective locus were: Dip-A, two; Dip-B, two; and Dip-C, three. Dip-A was genetically mapped at 57.9 on the second chromosome, and Dip-B and Dip-C at 80.9 and 87.9 on the third chromosome, respectively. Neither Dip-B nor Dip-C has been mapped in D. melanogaster because both loci are apparently monomorphic. Their map positions in D. simulans with respect to flanking markers whose homologous genes have been cytogenetically localized in D. melanogaster suggested that they might be mapped cytogenetically by using available deficiencies in D. melanogaster. Accordingly, by the construction of interspecific hybrids which carried deficiencies of melanogaster and an allele of simulans with a mobility different from that of the fixed melanogaster allele, Dip-B and Dip-C were localized between 87F12-14 and 88C1-3 and between 87B5-6 and 87B8-10, respectively, in the salivary gland chromosomes of D. melanogaster. The similarity between these two species is discussed on the basis of these findings.     

The distribution of the transposable elementBari-1 in theDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans genomes

The distribution of the transposable elementBari-1 inD. melanogaster andD. simulans was examined by Southern blot analysis and byin situ hybridization in a large number of strains of different geographical origins and established at different times.Bari-1 copies mostly homogeneous in size and physical map are detected in all strains tested. Both inD. melanogaster and inD. simulans a relatively high level of intraspecific insertion site polymorphism is detectable, suggesting that in both speciesBari-1 is or has been actively transposing. The main difference between the two sibling species is the presence of a large tadem array of the element in a well-defined heterochromatic location of theD. melanogaster genome, whereas such a cluster is absent inD. simulans. The presence ofBari-1 elements with apparently identical physical maps in allD. melanogaster andD. simulans strains examined suggests thatBari-1 is not a recent introduction in the genome of themelanogaster complex. Structural analysis reveals unusual features that distinguish it from other inverted repeat transposons, whereas many aspects are similar to the widely distributedTc1 element ofC. elegans.     

Hybrid lethal systems in theDrosophila melanogaster species complex

Lethal phases of the hybrids betweenDrosophila melanogaster and its sibling species,D. simulans are classified into three types: (1) embryonic lethality in hybrids carryingD. simulans cytoplasm andD. melanogaster X chromosome, (2) larval lethality in hybrids not carryingD. simulans X, and (3) temperature-sensitive pupal lethality in hybrids carryingD. simulans X. The same lethal phases are also observed when either of the two other sibling species,D. mauritiana orD. sechellia, is employed for hybridization withD. melanogaster. Here, we describe genetic analyses of each hybrid lethality, and demonstrate that these three types of lethality are independent phenomena. We then propose two models to interpret the mechanisms of each hybrid lethality. The first model is a modification of the conventional X/autosome imbalance hypothesis assuming a lethal gene and a suppressor gene are involved in the larval lethality, while the second model is for embryonic lethality assuming an interaction between a maternal-effect lethal gene and a suppressor gene.     

Isolation of Protease-Free Alcohol Dehydrogenase (ADH) from Drosophila simulans and Several Homozygous and Heterozygous Drosophila melanogaster Variants

The enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) fromseveral naturally occurring ADH variants ofDrosophila melanogaster and Drosophilasimulans was isolated. Affinity chromatography withthe ligand Cibacron Blue and elution with NAD⁺ showed similarbehavior for D. melanogaster ADH-FF, ADH-71k,and D. simulans ADH. Introduction of a secondCibacron Blue affinity chromatography step, withgradient elution with NAD⁺, resulted in pure and stable enzymes. D.melanogaster ADH-SS cannot be eluted from theaffinity chromatography column at a high concentrationof NAD⁺ and required a pH gradient for itspurification, preceded by a wash step with a high concentration ofNAD⁺. Hybrid Drosophila melanogasteralcohol dehydrogenase FS has been isolated fromheterozygous flies, using affinity chromatography withfirst elution at a high concentration NAD⁺, directlyfollowed by affinity chromatography elution with a pHgradient. Incubation of equal amounts of pure homodimersof Drosophila melanogaster ADH-FF and ADH-SS,in the presence of 3 M urea at pH 8.6, for 30 min at roomtemperature, followed by reassociation yielded activeDrosophila melanogaster ADH-FS heterodimers. Noproteolytic degradation was found after incubation ofpurified enzyme preparations in the absence or presenceof SDS, except for some degradation of ADH-SS after verylong incubation times. The thermostabilities of D.melanogaster ADH-71k and ADH-SS were almostidentical and were higher than those of D.melanogaster ADH-FF and D. simulans ADH. Thethermostability of D. melanogaster ADH-FS waslower than those of D. melanogaster ADH-FF andADH-SS. D. melanogaster ADH-FF and ADH-71k have identical inhibition constantswith the ligand Cibacron Blue at pH 8.6, which are twotimes higher at pH 9.5. The K_i values forD. simulans ADH are three times lower at bothpH values. D. melanogaster ADH-SS and ADH-FS havesimilar K_i values, which are lower than thosefor D. melanogaster ADH-FF at pH 8.6. But at pH9.5 the K_i value for ADH-FS is the same as atpH 8.6, while that of ADH-SS is seven times higher. Kinetic parameters ofDrosophila melanogaster ADH-FF, ADH-SS, andADH-71k and Drosophila simulans ADH, at pH 8.6and 9.5, showed little or no variation inK_m ^eth values. TheK_m ^NAD values measured at pH 9.5for Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenases are alllower than those measured at pH 8.6. The rate constants(k_cat) determined for all fourDrosophila alcohol dehydrogenases are higher at pH 9.5 than at pH 8.6. D.melanogaster ADH-FS showed nonlinear kinetics.     

Clonal analysis in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans

We have analysed the viability of cellular clones induced by mitotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster/D. simulans hybrid females during larval growth. These clones contain a portion of either melanogaster or simulans genomes in homozygosity. Analysis has been carried out for the X and the second chromosomes, as well as for the 3L chromosome arm. Clones were not found in certain structures, and in others they appeared in a very low frequency. Only in abdominal tergites was a significant number of clones observed, although their frequency was lower than in melanogaster abdomens. The bigger the portion of the genome that is homozygous, the less viable is the recombinant melano-gaster/simulans hybrid clone. The few clones that appeared may represent cases in which mitotic recombination took place in distal chromosome intervals, so that the clones contained a small portion of either melanogaster or simulans chromosomes in homozygosity. Moreover, Lhr, a gene of D. simulans that suppresses the lethality of male and female melanogaster/simulans hybrids, does not suppress the lethality of the recombinant melanogaster/simulans clones. Thus, it appears that there is not just a single gene, but at least one per tested chromosome arm (and maybe more) that cause hybrid lethality. Therefore, the two species, D. melanogaster and D. simulans, have diverged to such a degree that the absence of part of the genome of one species cannot be substituted by the corresponding part of the genome of the other, probably due to the formation of co-adapted gene complexes in both species following their divergent evolution after speciation. The disruption of those coadapted gene complexes would cause the lethality of the recombinant hybrid clones.