The role of the thalamus in the flow of information to the cortex

The lateral geniculate nucleus is the best understood thalamic relay and serves as a model for all thalamic relays. Only 5-10% of the input to geniculate relay cells derives from the retina, which is the driving input. The rest is modulatory and derives from local inhibitory inputs, descending inputs from layer 6 of the visual cortex, and ascending inputs from the brainstem. These modulatory inputs control many features of retinogeniculate transmission. One such feature is the response mode, burst or tonic, of relay cells, which relates to the attentional demands at the moment. This response mode depends on membrane potential, which is controlled effectively by the modulator inputs. The lateral geniculate nucleus is a first-order relay, because it relays subcortical (i.e. retinal) information to the cortex for the first time. By contrast, the other main thalamic relay of visual information, the pulvinar region, is largely a higher-order relay, since much of it relays information from layer 5 of one cortical area to another. All thalamic relays receive a layer-6 modulatory input from cortex, but higher-order relays in addition receive a layer-5 driver input. Corticocortical processing may involve these corticothalamocortical 're-entry' routes to a far greater extent than previously appreciated. If so, the thalamus sits at an indispensable position for the modulation of messages involved in corticocortical processing.     

The thalamus is more than just a relay

The lateral geniculate nucleus and pulvinar are examples of two different types of relay: the former is a first order relay, transmitting information from a subcortical source (retina), while the latter is mostly a higher order relay, transmitting information from layer 5 of one cortical area to another cortical area. First and higher order thalamic relays can also be recognized for much of the rest of thalamus, and most of thalamus seems to be comprised of higher order relays. Higher order relays seem especially important to general corticocortical communication, and this challenges and extends the conventional view that such communication is based on direct corticocortical connections.     

Thalamic relay functions and their role in corticocortical communication: generalizations from the visual system.

All neocortical areas receive thalamic inputs. Some thalamocortical pathways relay information from ascending pathways (first order thalamic relays) and others relay information from other cortical areas (higher order thalamic relays), thus serving a role in corticocortical communication. Most, possibly all, afferents reaching thalamus, ascending and cortical, are branches of axons that innervate lower (motor) centers, so that thalamocortical pathways can be viewed generally as monitors of ongoing motor instructions. In terms of numbers, the thalamic relay is dominated by synapses that modulate the relay functions. One of the roles of these modulatory pathways is to change the transfer of information through the thalamus, in accord with current attentional demands. Other roles remain to be explored. These modulatory functions can be expected to act on corticocortical communication in addition to their action on ascending pathways.     

Pulvina-lateralis posterior nucleus complex of mammals and the visual function

It is now well established that the lateral posterior-pulvinar (LP-P) complex of mammals is involved in visual processing. However, the actual function of these large nuclei of the thalamus remains unknown. In contrast to the nearby lateral geniculate nucleus, the LP-P complex does not receive any substantial direct projections from the retina. Its main visual inputs come from the mesencephalon and the neocortex. Most cells in the LP-P complex behave like cortical units. They are tuned to the orientation, direction, spatial and temporal frequencies of the visual stimulus. In addition, most units are binocular and sensitive to relative retinal disparity. Despite their multiple inputs, the LP-P complex cells form an homogeneous population and their overall properties do not reflect those of a given cortical or subcortical area. On the basis of its afferent and efferent connectivity, it has been proposed that the LP-P complex may serve as a relay of an extrageniculate ascendant pathway which originates from the superior colliculus, and/or provide another route for the geniculo-striate input to reach the extrastriate areas. Despite the fact that there is some electro-physiological evidence of such functions, it is now often suggested that the LP-P complex may integrate its multiple inputs and be involved in functions which go beyond those of a simple thalamic relay. Recent findings suggest that the LP-P complex might play a role in visual spatial attention.     

A contribution of synaptic plasticity in the basal ganglia to processing of visual information

The mechanism of involvement of the basal ganglia in processing of visual information on the basis of dopamine-dependent modulation of efficacy of synaptic transmission in interconnected parallel associative and limbic loops (cortex--basal ganglia--thalamus--cortex) is proposed. Each loop consists of one of the visual or prefrontal cortical areas connected with the thalamic nucleus and corresponding loci in different nuclei of the basal ganglia. Circulation of activity in such a loop provides reentrance of information into the thalamus and neocortex. Dopamine releasing in response to a visual stimulus oppositely modulates the efficacy of "strong" and "weak" corticostriatal inputs. Subsequent reorganization of activity in the loop leads to a disinhibition (inhibition) of activity of those cortical neurons that were "strongly" ("weakly)" excited by the visual stimulus simultaneously with activation of dopaminergic cells. A selected neuronal pattern in each cortical area represents a property of the visual stimulus processed by this area. Excitation of dopaminergic cells by the visual stimulus via the superior colliculi requires parallel activation of a disinhibitory input to the superior colliculi via the thalamus and a "direct" pathway through the basal ganglia. The prefrontal cortex excited by the visual stimulus via the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus performs a top-down control over the dopaminergic cell activity, supervising simultaneous dopamine release in different striatal loci and thus promotes the interconnected selection of neuronal representations of individual properties of the visual stimulus and their binding in an integrated image.     

Neuronal oscillations and multisensory interaction in primary auditory cortex

Recent anatomical, physiological, and neuroimaging findings indicate multisensory convergence at early, putatively unisensory stages of cortical processing. The objective of this study was to confirm somatosensory-auditory interaction in A1 and to define both its physiological mechanisms and its consequences for auditory information processing. Laminar current source density and multiunit activity sampled during multielectrode penetrations of primary auditory area A1 in awake macaques revealed clear somatosensory-auditory interactions, with a novel mechanism: somatosensory inputs appear to reset the phase of ongoing neuronal oscillations, so that accompanying auditory inputs arrive during an ideal, high-excitability phase, and produce amplified neuronal responses. In contrast, responses to auditory inputs arriving during the opposing low-excitability phase tend to be suppressed. Our findings underscore the instrumental role of neuronal oscillations in cortical operations. The timing and laminar profile of the multisensory interactions in A1 indicate that nonspecific thalamic systems may play a key role in the effect.     

Regulation pathways of expectancy behavior in the cat: histologic study

In the behaving cat, motion expectancy of an event to occur (for a prey to appear) is accompanied by the development of 14 Hz electrocortical mu rhythms in the hand subarea of cortical somatic area SI. Our first aim here was to identify subcortical sites projecting to this cortical mu focus, using localised retrograde HRP marking. The only site thus labelled was the thalamic zone well known to project to the cortical mu area, and to act as a generator for the mu rhythms (ventral posterior nucleus, VP); no other deep structure could be identified, that could have been considered as a putative zone for control of cortical mu. We then injected minute amounts of HRP into the thalamic mu zone; labelled neurones were located (apart from those expected in the relays of the somatic pathway) in locus coeruleus (bilaterally) and ipsilaterally in the thalamic nuclei anteroventralis and laterodorsalis. In brief then, it seems that the regulation of the VP-SI mu channel (that we could previously demonstrate), by other deep structures is exerted upon the thalamic side.     

Neurobiology of trigeminal pain

The brainstem trigeminal complex integrates somatosensory inputs from orofacial areas and meninges. Recent studies have shown the existence of a double representation of pain within the brainstem, at the level of both caudalis and oralis subnuclei. Noxious messages are mainly conveyed by C-fibers that activate the subnucleus caudalis neurons. These neurons in turn activate the subnucleus oralis whose neurons share similar features with the deep spinal dorsal horn neurons. In contrast with the nearness of the laminar organization of the dorsal horn, the vertical organization of the trigeminal complex offers an easier access for the study of segmental mechanisms of nociceptive processing. This model allowed us to show the existence of subtle NMDA-related mechanisms of segmental nocious processing. The trigeminal complex conveys nociceptive messages to several brainstem and thalamic relays that activate a number of cortical areas responsible for pain sensations and reactions. Cortical processing is sustained by reciprocal interactions with thalamic areas and also by a direct modulation of their pre-thalamic relays. The dysfunction of these multiple modulatory mechanisms probably plays a key role in the pathophysiology of chronic trigeminal pain.     

The thalamus as a monitor of motor outputs

Many of the ascending pathways to the thalamus have branches involved in movement control. In addition, the recently defined, rich innervation of 'higher' thalamic nuclei (such as the pulvinar) from pyramidal cells in layer five of the neocortex also comes from branches of long descending axons that supply motor structures. For many higher thalamic nuclei the clue to understanding the messages that are relayed to the cortex will depend on knowing the nature of these layer five motor outputs and on defining how messages from groups of functionally distinct output types are combined as inputs to higher cortical areas. Current evidence indicates that many and possibly all thalamic relays to the neocortex are about instructions that cortical and subcortical neurons are contributing to movement control. The perceptual functions of the cortex can thus be seen to represent abstractions from ongoing motor instructions.     

Corticothalamic interactions in the transfer of visual information

Thalamic function does not stand apart, as a discrete processing step, from the cortical circuitry. The thalamus receives extensive feedback from the cortex and this influences the firing pattern, synchronization and sensory response mode of relay cells. A crucial question concerns the extent to which the feedback simply controls the state and transmission mode of relay cells and the extent to which the feedback participates in the specific processing of sensory information. Using examples from experiments examining the influence of feedback from the visual cortex to the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), we argue that thalamic mechanisms are selectively focused by visually driven feedback to optimize the thalamic contribution to segmentation and global integration. This involves effects on both the temporal and spatial parameters characterizing the responses of LGN cells and includes, for example, motion-driven feedback effects from MT (middle temporal visual area) relayed via layer 6 of V1 (primary visual cortex).     

A role of the basal ganglia in the occurrence of visual hallucinations (a hypothetical mechanism)

A hypothetical mechanism of the basal ganglia involvement in visual hallucinations is proposed. According to this mechanism, hallucination is the result of modulation of the efficacy of corticostriatal synaptic inputs and changes in spiny cell activity due to the rise of striatal dopamine concentration (or due to other reasons). These changes cause an inhibition of neurons in the substantia nigra pars reticulata and subsequent disinhibition of neurons in the superior colliculus and pedunculopontine nucleus (including its cholinergic cells). In the absence of afferentation from the retina this disinhibition leads to activation of neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus, pulvinar and other thalamic nuclei projecting to the primary and highest visual cortical areas, prefrontal cortex, and also back to the striatum. Hallucinations as conscious visual patterns are the result of selection of signals circulating in several interconnected loops each of which includes one of above mentioned neocortical areas, one of thalamic nuclei, limbic and one of visual areas of the basal ganglia, superior colliculus and/or pedunculopontine nucleus. According to our model, cannabinoids, opioids and ketamine may lead to hallucinations due to their promotional role in the LTD of cortical inputs to GABAergic spiny cells of striatal striosomes projecting to dopaminergic neurons, disinhibition of the lasts, and increase in striatal dopamine concentration.     

UP States Protect Ongoing Cortical Activity from Thalamic Inputs

Cortical neurons in vitro and in vivo fluctuate spontaneously between two stable membrane potentials: a depolarized UP state and a hyperpolarized DOWN state. UP states temporally correspond with multineuronal firing sequences which may be important for information processing. To examine how thalamic inputs interact with ongoing cortical UP state activity, we used calcium imaging and targeted whole-cell recordings of activated neurons in thalamocortical slices of mouse somatosensory cortex. Whereas thalamic stimulation during DOWN states generated multineuronal, synchronized UP states, identical stimulation during UP states had no effect on the subthreshold membrane dynamics of the vast majority of cells or on ongoing multineuronal temporal patterns. Both thalamocortical and corticocortical PSPs were significantly reduced and neuronal input resistance was significantly decreased during cortical UP states – mechanistically consistent with UP state insensitivity. Our results demonstrate that cortical dynamics during UP states are insensitive to thalamic inputs.     

Brain states: top-down influences in sensory processing

All cortical and thalamic levels of sensory processing are subject to powerful top-down influences, the shaping of lower-level processes by more complex information. New findings on the diversity of top-down interactions show that cortical areas function as adaptive processors, being subject to attention, expectation, and perceptual task. Brain states are determined by the interactions between multiple cortical areas and the modulation of intrinsic circuits by feedback connections. In perceptual learning, both the encoding and recall of learned information involves a selection of the appropriate inputs that convey information about the stimulus being discriminated. Disruption of this interaction may lead to behavioral disorders, including schizophrenia.     

Unit responses of the first and second somatosensory cortical areas to peripheral,thalamic, and cortical stimulation

Unit responses of the first (SI) somatosensory area of the cortex to stimulation of the second somatosensory area (SII), the ventral posterior thalamic nucleus, and the contralateral forelimb, and also unit responses in SII evoked by stimulation of SI, the ventral posterior thalamic nucleus, and the contralateral forelimb were investigated in experiments on cats immobilized with D-tubocurarine or Myo-Relaxin (succinylcholine). The results showed a substantially higher percentage of neurons in SII than in SI which responded to an afferent stimulus by excitation brought about through two or more synaptic relays in the cortex. In response to cortical stimulation antidromic and orthodromic responses appeared in SI and SII neurons, confirming the presence of two-way cortico-cortical connections. In both SI and SII intracellular recording revealed in most cases PSPs of similar character and intensity, evoked by stimulation of the cortex and nucleus in the same neuron. Latent periods of orthodromic spike responses to stimulation of nucleus and cortex in 50.5% of SI neurons and 37.1% of SII neurons differed by less than 1.0 msec. In 19.6% of SI and 41.4% of SII neurons the latent period of response to cortical stimulation was 1.6–4.7 msec shorter than the latent period of the response evoked in the same neuron by stimulation of the nucleus. It is concluded from these results that impulses from SI play an important role in the afferent activation of SII neurons.A. A. Bogomolets Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR, Kiev. Translated from Neirofiziologiya, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 351–357, July–August, 1976.     

Electrical activity of thalamocortical association systems in postnatal ontogeny of the cat

Electrical responses to somatic, photic, and acoustic stimulation in the sensomotor, parietal, temporal, and occipital regions of the cortex were studied in the nucleus lateralis posterior and nucleus ventralis lateralis of the thalamus by recording averaged evoked potentials in kittens (aged 3 to 41 days) anesthetized with pentobarbital. A definite order of maturation of afferent inputs into cortical association areas was demonstrated. The parietal cortex was shown to become polysensory before the sensorimotor cortex. It is suggested that the nucleus lateralis posterior is the main thalamic nucleus responsible for conduction of visual information to the cortex in kittens during the first month of life. Incorporation of this nucleus into the system conducting somatic impulsation to the sensorimotor cortex takes place by the age of 3 weeks.A. A. Zhdanov Leningrad State University. Translated from Neirofiziologiya, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 476–482, September–October, 1982.     

Dopamine-dependent interactions between limbic and prefrontal cortical plasticity in the nucleus accumbens: disruption by cocaine sensitization

The prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus exhibit converging projections to the nucleus accumbens and have functional reciprocal connections via indirect pathways. As a result, information processing between these structures is likely to be bidirectional. Using evoked potential measures, we examined the interactions of these inputs on synaptic plasticity within the accumbens. Our results show that the direction of information flow between the prefrontal cortex and limbic structures determines the synaptic plasticity that these inputs exhibit within the accumbens. Moreover, this synaptic plasticity at hippocampal and prefrontal inputs selectively involves dopamine D1 and D2 activation or inactivation, respectively. Repeated cocaine administration disrupted this synaptic plasticity at hippocampal and prefrontal cortical inputs and goal-directed behavior in the spatial maze task. Thus, interactions of limbic-prefrontal cortical synaptic plasticity and its dysfunction within the accumbens could underlie complex information processing deficits observed in individuals following psychostimulant administration.     

A Functional Hypothesis for LGN-V1-TRN Connectivities Suggested by Computer Simulation

We employ computer simulation to investigate the function of neural circuitries between thalamic sensory relay nuclei, primary sensory cortices, and the thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN). Computational similarities exist between these circuits and the architecture of a simple artificial neural network. We impose processing parameters on this network architecture in keeping with anatomical and physiological details of the mammalian geniculo-cortical visual pathway, and then run the simulation on a task involving multiple simultaneous inputs from the simulated visual field. After two to three loops through the simulation, activity in cortical and thalamic units whose receptive fields include the stronger stimulus remains constant, while activity in other cortical and thalamic units activated by weaker stimuli declines toward resting values. These results suggest that the modeled neural circuitry functions to prime selective attentional mechanisms further up the visual streams toward specific portions of the total visual stimulus. Besides extending existing models and evidence about the function of these neural circuits, our results also provide physiologists with predicted activity profiles of thalamic and cortical elements of the modeled neural system for a task not yet studied experimentally.     

The Role of Thalamic Population Synchrony in the Emergence of Cortical Feature Selectivity

In a wide range of studies, the emergence of orientation selectivity in primary visual cortex has been attributed to a complex interaction between feed-forward thalamic input and inhibitory mechanisms at the level of cortex. Although it is well known that layer 4 cortical neurons are highly sensitive to the timing of thalamic inputs, the role of the stimulus-driven timing of thalamic inputs in cortical orientation selectivity is not well understood. Here we show that the synchronization of thalamic firing contributes directly to the orientation tuned responses of primary visual cortex in a way that optimizes the stimulus information per cortical spike. From the recorded responses of geniculate X-cells in the anesthetized cat, we synthesized thalamic sub-populations that would likely serve as the synaptic input to a common layer 4 cortical neuron based on anatomical constraints. We used this synchronized input as the driving input to an integrate-and-fire model of cortical responses and demonstrated that the tuning properties match closely to those measured in primary visual cortex. By modulating the overall level of synchronization at the preferred orientation, we show that efficiency of information transmission in the cortex is maximized for levels of synchronization which match those reported in thalamic recordings in response to naturalistic stimuli, a property which is relatively invariant to the orientation tuning width. These findings indicate evidence for a more prominent role of the feed-forward thalamic input in cortical feature selectivity based on thalamic synchronization.     

The functional logic of cortico-pulvinar connections

The pulvinar is an 'associative' thalamic nucleus, meaning that most of its input and output relationships are formed with the cerebral cortex. The function of this circuitry is little understood and its anatomy, though much investigated, is notably recondite. This is because pulvinar connection patterns disrespect the architectural subunits (anterior, medial, lateral and inferior pulvinar nuclei) that have been the traditional reference system. This article presents a simplified, global model of the organization of cortico-pulvinar connections so as to pursue their structure-function relationships. Connections between the cortex and pulvinar are topographically organized, and as a result the pulvinar contains a 'map' of the cortical sheet. However, the topography is very blurred. Hence the pulvinar connection zones of nearby cortical areas overlap, allowing indirect transcortical communication via the pulvinar. A general observation is that indirect cortico-pulvino-cortical circuits tend to mimic direct cortico-cortical pathways: this is termed 'the replication principle'. It is equally apt for certain pairs (or groups) of nearby cortical areas that happen not to connect with each other. The 'replication' of this non-connection is achieved by discontinuities and dislocations of the cortical topography within the pulvinar, such that the associated pair of connection zones do not overlap. Certain of these deformations can be used to divide the global cortical topography into specific sub-domains, which form the natural units of a connectional subdivision of the pulvinar. A substantial part of the pulvinar also expresses visual topography, reflecting visual maps in occipital cortex. There are just two well-ordered visual maps in the pulvinar, that both receive projections from area V1, and several other occipital areas; the resulting duplication of cortical topography means that each visual map also acts as a separate connection domain. In summary, the model identifies four topographically ordered connection domains, and reconciles the coexistence of visual and cortical maps in two of them. The replication principle operates at and below the level of domain structure. It is argued that cortico-pulvinar circuitry replicates the pattern of cortical circuitry but not its function, playing a more regulatory role instead. Thalamic neurons differ from cortical neurons in their inherent rhythmicity, and the pattern of cortico-thalamic connections must govern the formation of specific resonant circuits. The broad implication is that the pulvinar acts to coordinate cortical information processing by facilitating and sustaining the formation of synchronized trans-areal assemblies; a more pointed suggestion is that, owing to the considerable blurring of cortical topography in the pulvinar, rival cortical assemblies may be in competition to recruit thalamic elements in order to outlast each other in activity.