Epidemiology of root caries

Many epidemiological studies have been conducted on a variety of populations. Unfortunately, comparison of the prevalence data, and to a lesser degree of the incidence data, between the various studies is of little use due to the lack of standardised diagnostic criteria, reporting methods and population diversity. In the few incidence studies which have been conducted around 30–40% of people developed root caries, although many adults in the population appear to have been affected by root caries. Many risk factors associated with the occurrence of root caries have been identified and these include oral, medical, mental, behavioural and psychosocial conditions.     

Trends in Oral Disease and Health1

Geriatric dentistry researchers are building a basic knowledge basic pertaining to the oral health status of older adults. Important findings on the prevalence of disease that run counter to “conventional wisdom” surrounding the oral health of older adults are that edentulism is decreasing, that both coronal and root caries are prevalent, that serious periodontal disease is not as prevalent as thought, that chronological age is not strongly associated with disease in older adults, and that oral lesions, especially those related to dentures, are prevalent. An important finding has been that the majority of disease seems to occur in a minority of the population. While the prevalence of oral diseases have been shown to be associated with water fluoridation, systemic diseases, use of medications, social and behavioral factors, and a variety of other oral conditions, there is only preliminary information on the incidence of disease and actual risk factors. The data available on the incidence of disease come from a study of community-dwelling older adults in Iowa, and these data generally confirm the prevalence results. Coronal and root caries are active in this older population with caries being the best predictor of tooth loss. Furthermore, most disease occurs in a high risk group. Multivariate models predicting people at highest risk for root and coronal caries implicate stress and anxiety, use of tobacco, and recent onset of illness as risk factors. In addition, preliminary results indicate that some dental conditions may be predictive of general health status.     

The Epidemiology of Dental Diseases in the Elderly1

This paper summarizes and evaluates epidemiologic evidence on adult dental conditions with a focus on older adults. Information is presented on coronal caries; root caries; loss of teeth, attrition, abrasion, and erosion; periodontal diseases; and oral cancer. The author concludes that the oral health status of the elderly in the United States is essentially unknown. There are no recent, representative population base studies of oral conditions in the elderly. Studies of prevalence or incidence of oral diseases typically include few elderly persons or describe a select group of elderly who are at high risk. Furthermore, it is not really known whether the incidence and prevalence of coronal caries or root caries is actually increasing or is part of a cohort effect. While oral cancers have been shown to increase with age, there is no information as to whether their incidence rates are increasing. While, clinically, there are indications that attrition, abrasion and erosion are characteristics that are more likely to be seen in older adults, there is no information about their distribution in the population. There is evidence that loss of teeth is decreasing but nothing is known about the patterning of that loss. As for periodontal diseases, much work is needed to identify various syndromes that may be distinguished by their distribution in the population as well as determining whether periodontitis is a condition responsible for a majority of tooth loss or just the majority of tooth loss in a small high risk group. In addition, some suggestions are presented for future directions of research in this area.     

Root caries incidence and associated risk factors in middle-aged and older adults

Data from population-based longitudinal studies required to assess the incidence of root caries and associated risk factors are sparse in the literature. To this end, a group of 130 middle-aged and older adults were examined for root caries at baseline and at a follow-up visit between nine and 24 months (median: 16 months). Dental examinations were conducted by one examiner at a Tufts dental clinic using NIDR defined diagnostic criteria. Fifty percent of subjects in this study population developed one or more new root caries lesions over the follow-up period. Also, an annualised increment of 0.60 (SD: 0.72) decayed and filled surfaces per person was observed for the 45–59 year old group while the 70+ group showed an annualised increment of 1.38 (SD: 1.97) DFS in this study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified past root caries experience, high plaque score, and high number of teeth (>= 22) to be positively associated with new root caries (p < 0.05).     

Microbial Etiology of Root Surface Caries

Available knowledge relating to the microbiology of root surface caries was reviewed. This included direct information from microbiological observations on human and animal material as well as subsidiary information derived from pertinent dietary studies and histological examination of cemental lesions. Early investigations on root surface caries in experimental animals have provided valuable insight into some of the dietobacterial interactions involved. However, these ideas have not been completely validated at the human level. It was concluded that interactions between oral bacteria and other factors involved in the development of root surface dental caries may be broader in scope and more difficult to interpret than the bacterial activities which result in coronal caries.     

The prevalence of root surface caries amongst Irish adults

In a national survey of adult dental health conducted in the Republic of Ireland in 1989/90 a total of 1,527 subjects aged 25 and older were examined for root surface caries. It was found that the prevalence of root surface caries was highest in older age groups and also amongst males, residents of non-fluoridated communities and those earning low incomes. Tooth loss masked the potential prevalence of root surface caries. With more persons retaining their natural teeth into middle and old age the prevalence of root surface caries is likely to increase in the future.     

Number of teeth and risk of root caries

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the association between number of natural teeth and prevalence of root caries. Design: A cross‐sectional design was adopted. A stratified multi‐stage purposive sampling method was used to select a wide range of elderly people from all social classes, educational levels and sexes. Data was collected through interviews and clinical examinations. Setting: Urban area in Chiang Mai‐Thailand. Participants: 549 elderly dentate aged 60‐74 years. Main Outcome Measures: Teeth with decay and filled roots (DF‐T). Results: The prevalence of root caries was 18.2% with a mean DF‐T of 0.58 (S.D. 2.02). Results of multiple logistic regression showed that number of teeth, DMF‐S scores, sex, and socio economic factors were statistically significantly associated with root caries (P<0.05). Adjusted odds ratios demonstrated a 14% increase in the chance of having root caries when the number of teeth increased one unit. Similarly, a 3% increase was observed for each unit increase in the DMF‐S scores (p<0.001). Being male, having more than four years of education and earning more than 1500 baht/month increased the chances of root caries by 76%, 139% and 85% respectively (p<0.001). Recession and age were not statistically significantly associated with root caries. Conclusions: Having more teeth, higher DMF‐S scores, earning more than 1500 baht/month, having more than 4 years of education and being male increased the likelihood of having root caries.     

Clinical and behavioural risk indicators for root caries in older people

Objective: To investigate the clinical and behavioural factors indicating root caries risk among older people. Desing: Cross sectional clinical and interview data from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (aged 65 years and over) in Great Britain. Logistic regression models of the prevalence of root caries and linear regression models of the extent of root caries were constructed to quantify the role of a range of clinical and behavioural risk indicators, including sugars intake. Setting: A national sample of older British adults, free‐living and institutionalised. Participants: 462 dentate adults aged 65 years or over. Results: Nine or more intakes of sugars per day more than doubled the odds of root caries being present (OR 2.2–2.4). Other clinical and behavioural factors affecting root caries included wearing a partial denture in the presence of heavy plaque deposits (OR 2.1–2.6) and infrequent tooth brushing (OR 2.8 – 4.1). Linear regression models showed that, amongst those that had root caries, sucking sweets in the presence of a dry mouth, poor hygiene, partial dentures and living in an institution contributed to the extent of root caries, as measured by the RCI(d). Conclusions: Of the factors open to possible clinical or behavioural intervention, frequent sugars intake, poor hygiene and partial dentures were all associated with large increases in risk.     

Examiner agreement on caries detection and plaque accumulation during dental surveys of elders

Indices used to evaluate plaque accumulation and coronal caries have been widely accepted in epidemiological studies, yet their reliability cannot be guaranteed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of clinical criteria used in coronal and root caries diagnosis and oral hygiene evaluation as applied in elders. Nineteen elderly subjects, 73 years old on average, were examined at a first appointment by two independent examiners. They were re-examined two weeks later. Plaque accumulation was evaluated using the Plaque Index (PI) and coronal and root caries were detected according to the WHO criteria and Fejerskov et al (1991), respectively. Recurrent caries was recorded as recommended by WHO and by probing at the interface tooth-restoration. Inter- and intra-examiner agreement was evaluated using kappa statistics. The PI score showed good reliability except for examiner b, for whom a simplification of the 4-point scale in 3-point scale improved significantly the reliability. The prevalence of coronal caries was very low and intra- and inter-examiner agreement was poor. Most of the root caries lesions were covered by plaque and the kappa values indicated only poor agreement. Recurrent caries were found with good agreement using WHO criteria but the detection with the probe was not reliable. In conclusion, it seems that examiners should be trained carefully to maximise their reliability and that plaque should be removed to obtain reliable diagnoses of caries. Retraining and calibration may be necessary for surveys continuing over a long period.     

The Clinical Identification of Root Caries

This paper discusses a variety of considerations associated with the clinical identification of root caries. While focusing upon this clinical identification process from the perspective of the clinical researcher, the differing diagnostic needs between the clinical researcher and the dental practitioner are frequently addressed. The topic of the identification of untreated root caries lesions includes a presentation of both existing definitions and a proposed set of diagnostic criteria. The presentation of the topic on the identification of arrested and treated root caries lesions emphasizes the diagnostic challenge that will occur due to the newly introduced chemotherapeutic treatments that have been proposed for the control of root caries. The influence of varying examination conditions, techniques and instruments on the reliability and validity of the clinical identification of root caries are also considered. Finally, a preliminary set of clinical research diagnostic conventions, which would both aid the researcher in “grey zone decisions” and enhance comparability of findings across studies, are proposed.     

Dental Caries in the Elderly

Studies in the United States and other countries have shown that there is continued caries activity with advancing age. These studies, however, do not elaborate on the nature of the dental caries nor its anatomical location on the tooth. It has been assumed that dental caries occur on the coronal portion of retained teeth and that recurrent decay around existing restorations represents the major form of the disease. In addition to continued coronal caries activity in adults, the problem of carious lesions occurring on the exposed roots of teeth has been identified in a number of recent surveys. The exposure of the root surface to the oral cavity is a consequence of the apical migration of the periodontal attachment through periodontal disease and dental treatment which renders this part of the tooth at risk of the dental caries process. However, there are several distinct differences between coronal and root caries. The continued occurrence of coronal caries in adults and the projected increase m the prevalence of root caries suggests an expanded role for the restorative and preventive services for the older adult patient. Although the techniques relating to coronal caries are well-established, those relating to root caries are just beginning to be explored and developed. Many of the principles, materials and philosophies which have proved to be effective for coronal caries are not equally efficacious when the tooth root is involved. This area represents a fertile field for research and development in the older adult patient.     

Caries and periodontal disease of the elderly in Pomerania, Germany: results of the Study of Health in Pomerania

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the oral health status of older adults living in north‐eastern Germany. Materials and Methods: Representative samples of adults aged 60 years or older were examined as part of Study of the Health in Pomerania, a cross‐sectional, population‐based study. Data on 1446 subjects aged 60–79 years were evaluated for coronal caries using the decayed/missing/filled teeth (DMFT) index, root caries using the root caries index (RCI), calculus, plaque, bleeding on probing, pocket depth and attachment loss. Results: The prevalence of edentulousness varied from 16% in the 60–65‐year‐old group to 30% in the 75–79‐year‐old group, whereas the median number of remaining natural teeth per subject varied from 14 in the youngest age group (60–65 years) to one in the oldest (75–79 years). Among subjects aged 60–69 years, a quarter (26%) of the teeth examined had coronal restoration against 17% in the oldest age group (70–79 years). Coronal caries was found in 2% of the teeth in both age groups. Among teeth with gingival recession, 6% had fillings on root surfaces and 2% had root caries, irrespective of age. In all, 11% of the subjects had at least one untreated coronal lesion and 27% had at least one untreated root caries lesion. Plaque score, calculus score and bleeding on probing were higher in the oldest age group (70–79 years). The prevalence of periodontal disease expressed as the presence of at least one periodontal pocket of 4 mm and more, was higher in men and among the younger subjects (men aged 60–69 years: 85% vs. 71% in 70–79‐year‐old men; women aged 60–69 years: 71% vs. 62% in 70–79‐year‐olds). The prevalence of attachment loss of 3 mm or more followed a similar pattern. Conclusions: It seems therefore that in this population, the major oral health concern is related to caries and the small number of teeth retained among the dentate subjects.     

The scientific and public-health imperative for a vaccine against dental caries

Dental caries is caused by one of the most ubiquitous bacterial infections of humans. In many countries such as Brazil and China, this disease is reaching epidemic proportions, and it is clear that a more effective public-health measure to combat dental caries is needed, because disadvantaged children are the most severely affected. One of the main groups of oral microorganisms, the mutans streptococci, has been associated with the aetiology of dental caries, and preclinical studies of immunological interventions have shown the feasibility of interfering with this disease. Moreover, clinical trials have indicated that a mucosal immune response to a crucial antigen(s) of mutans streptococci can influence the pathogenesis of dental caries. Evidence that this antigen(s) is appropriate for use in a vaccine against dental caries, as well as evidence for an appropriate target population of individuals and a logical time of administration, has now emerged.     

The Diagnosis of Root Caries – A Review

Interest in root caries has grown among dental caries research workers over the past 20 years. However, many studies, either in the fields of microbiology, pathology, epidemiology or clinical trials, have used differing definitions in their diagnosis of root caries. These differences mean that comparison between studies is difficult, if not impossible. Most of the criteria currently in use are neither sufficiently specific to allow the identification of the initial root caries lesion, not detailed enough to assess the progression of lesions. Furthermore, most definitions provide no information on treatment need within the populations studied. In this paper, the criteria which have been used to diagnose root caries, and their individual components – texture, cavitation, position, size, colour and radiolucency – are reviewed. It is concluded that there is a need to standardise terminology and definitions used for the diagnosis of root caries.     

Dental status and dental caries in 85-year-old Danes

Objectives: This study reports findings on the dental status and the prevalence of dental caries among a group of 85‐year‐old Danes from the Glostrup 1914 Cohort, Denmark. The purpose of the study was to analyse whether caries experience was related to number of teeth and to indicators of functional ability and cognitive function. Methods: A total of 191 individuals (78 men and 113 women) participated in a cross‐sectional population study conducted in 2000. Using mobile dental equipment, a clinical oral examination and an interview were administered to all participants in their homes. Functional ability was measured by the Mob‐H scale and cognitive function was assessed by the Mini‐Mental State Examination. Results: Fifty‐nine per cent of the participants had their own natural teeth and for the dentate participants, the mean number of teeth was 13 (range 1–27). A high prevalence of active caries on coronal and root surfaces was observed. Older adults with few natural teeth had a higher prevalence of active coronal and root caries and a higher unmet treatment need than older adults with many teeth. Further, the study showed that 85‐year‐old persons with reduced functional ability and cognitive impairment tended to have more active caries than 85‐year‐olds with no impairment. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of 85‐year‐old individuals had retained a natural dentition; however, active dental caries is a problem of concern among the most elderly.     

Demographic Trends of Aging — Application to Gerodontology1

Aging of the global world population both in developed and developing countries, an unbalanced male-female ratio within this elderly population, increasing populations – including elderly – within urban areas, all will have a marked effect on the practice of dentistry. Furthermore, major epidemiological changes occurring in the dental field, including an increasing dentition life expectancy, increasing root caries prevalence, decreasing coronal caries rates in children, and the relative increase in the prevalence of periodontal problems will have further impact on the dental care system. Major changes need to be anticipated both at the level of the care provider, including the dentist, the hygienist and the dental assistant, and at the level of the potential patient, especially among the geriatric population, if the profession is to be prepared to adequately address these issues.     

The effectiveness of 10% chlorhexidine varnish treatment on dental caries incidence in adults with dry mouth

Objectives: This study compared a 10% chlorhexidine varnish treatment with placebo and sham treatments for preventing dental caries in adult patients with xerostomia (dry mouth). Design: The study was a multicentred, randomized, parallel group, double blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trial. Setting: All examinations and procedures were performed at Tuft's University, Boston, MA, the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC or the University of Western Ontario, London, ON. Subjects: Subjects were adults with recent or current dental caries experience, high salivary levels of cariogenic microorganisms and low salivary flow rates. Results: 236 subjects completed at least one post‐treatment examination. There were 697 new carious lesions diagnosed, 446 (64%) located on coronal surfaces and 251 (36%) located on root surfaces. The mean attack rate was 0.23 surfaces/100 surfaces at risk. A treatment difference observed between the Active and Placebo groups was statistically significant for root caries increment (p=.02) and total caries increment (p=.03). A treatment difference observed between the Active and Sham groups was not statistically significant for coronal, root or total caries increment. Analysis of variance of treatment group differences was performed using mutans streptococci counts, salivary flow rates, age, sex, caries prevalence, medications, time to first event and early withdrawal as co‐variables. These factors did not meaningfully alter the findings. Conclusions: The difference between the 10% chlorhexidine varnish and placebo treatments is considered to be highly clinically significant for root caries increment (41% reduction) and for total caries increment (25% reduction) but only for coronal caries increment (14%).     

Indicators for root caries in Danish persons with recently diagnosed Alzheimer's disease

doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2011.00560.x
Indicators for root caries in Danish persons with recently diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease Objective: To identify indicators of root caries among persons with newly diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Background: Few studies have investigated dental caries in older adults with AD. Previously we found that persons with AD had significantly more root caries compared to persons with dementia other than AD. Methods: Participants were recruited from two university hospital clinics in Copenhagen, Denmark. A team of neurologists/geriatricians carried out the diagnostic screening. The study included an interview, oral examination and medical records. Results: We evaluated potential indicators of root decay across subjects with 3+ decayed surfaces vs. <3 decayed surfaces. Variables associated with increased odds of root caries were age over 80 years, 2+ decayed coronal surfaces and 5+ filled root surfaces. Among the social variables, living with someone was associated with a nearly 70% reduction in the odds of having 3+ surfaces of untreated caries. Discussion: Root caries is highly prevalent among individuals with new AD and there is still a strong need for active assessment of and attention to oral problems in persons with AD. Our findings document that recently diagnosed AD cases with multiple coronal caries lesions are at elevated risk of having more root caries. Also persons 81+ years and those with multiple root fillings are more likely to have numerous untreated root lesions.     

The effect of geochemical factors on prevalences of dental diseases for prehistoric inhabitants of the state of Missouri

In previous epidemiological studies, it has been suggested that geochemical factors besides fluoride may affect the prevalences of dental diseases. Our objective in this study was to determine whether the prevalences of periodontal diseases, coronal caries, and root caries for prehistoric inhabitants vary between geochemical regions of the state of Missouri. Burial sites were located on unique maps that depict geochemical variation among regions of the state. Data on dental caries and alveolar bone loss were gathered from 179 of the best preserved skeletal remains of the Late Woodland (A.D. 400-900) and Mississippian (A.D. 900-1700) periods. Mean caries scores and proportions of individuals with caries were calculated for these geochemical regions. Average alveolar bone loss was regressed on age for the individuals of these regions. Significant differences in caries and bone loss were found between several regions. These differences cannot be adequately explained by fluoride concentrations or by diet. It is suggested that geochemical factors, in addition to fluoride, may have affected the prevalences of dental diseases.     

Impact of socio-demographic variables, oral hygiene practices, oral habits and diet on dental caries experience of Indian elderly: a community-based study

A number of factors influence the caries experience and the pattern of restorative care especially in the older age group. Objective: To evaluate the dental caries experience and restorative treatment needs of an elderly Indian population and to study the impact of socio‐demographic variables, oral hygiene practices, oral habits and dietary practices on them. Design: A community‐based study. Setting: An urban area in the south zone of Delhi and a cluster of four villages in its neighbourhood. Subjects: A total of 1240 elderly subjects, 716 urban and 524 rural, were included in the study. Results: Of the 1052 dentate elderly subjects, 676 (64.2%) had decayed teeth (66.7% root caries and 33.3% coronal caries), 69 (6.6%) had filled teeth and 17 (1.6%) had recurrent decay. Restorations were indicated in 233 (22.2%) subjects, endodontic treatment in 51 (4.8%) and extractions in 424 (40.3%). Urban–rural differences in caries experience were statistically significant. Multivariate regression analysis showed that dental caries was associated with literacy level, oral hygiene practices, oral health perception and diet, while previous restorative treatment was correlated only with location (urban–rural) and presence or absence of systemic diseases. Conclusion: Dental caries prevalence was high amongst the studied elderly population and significant differences were observed in those living in a rural compared with an urban setting. Only a small percentage of elderly had evidence of previous restorative treatment whereas their unmet treatment need was significant.