TATA and paused promoters active in differentiated tissues have distinct expression characteristics

Core promoter types differ in the extent to which RNA polymerase II (Pol II) pauses after initiation, but how this affects their tissue‐specific gene expression characteristics is not well understood. While promoters with Pol II pausing elements are active throughout development, TATA promoters are highly active in differentiated tissues. We therefore used a genomics approach on late‐stage Drosophila embryos to analyze the properties of promoter types. Using tissue‐specific Pol II ChIP‐seq, we found that paused promoters have high levels of paused Pol II throughout the embryo, even in tissues where the gene is not expressed, while TATA promoters only show Pol II occupancy when the gene is active. The promoter types are associated with different chromatin accessibility in ATAC‐seq data and have different expression characteristics in single‐cell RNA‐seq data. The two promoter types may therefore be optimized for different properties: paused promoters show more consistent expression when active, while TATA promoters have lower background expression when inactive. We propose that tissue‐specific genes have evolved to use two different strategies for their differential expression across tissues.     

Cytochrome P450 26A1 regulates the clusters and killing activity of NK cells during the peri‐implantation period

Cytochrome P450 26A1 (CYP26A1) plays a vital role in early pregnancy in mice. Our previous studies have found that CYP26A1 affects embryo implantation by modulating natural killer (NK) cells, and that there is a novel population of CYP26A1⁺ NK cells in the uteri of pregnant mice. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of CYP26A1 on the subsets and killing activity of NK cells. Through single‐cell RNA sequencing (scRNA‐seq), we identified four NK cell subsets in the uterus, namely, conventional NK (cNK), tissue‐resident NK (trNK) 1 and 2, and proliferating trNK (trNKp). The two most variable subpopulations after uterine knockdown of CYP26A1 were trNKp and trNK2 cells. CYP26A1 knockdown significantly downregulated the expression of the NK cell function‐related genes Cd44, Cd160, Vegfc, and Slamf6 in trNK2 cells, and Klra17 and Ogn in trNKp cells. Both RNA‐seq and cytotoxicity assays confirmed that CYP26A1⁺ NK cells had low cytotoxicity. These results indicate that CYP26A1 may affect the immune microenvironment at the maternal‐foetal interface by regulating the activity of NK cells.     

Whole‐body senescent cell clearance alleviates age‐related brain inflammation and cognitive impairment in mice

Cellular senescence is characterized by an irreversible cell cycle arrest and a pro‐inflammatory senescence‐associated secretory phenotype (SASP), which is a major contributor to aging and age‐related diseases. Clearance of senescent cells has been shown to improve brain function in mouse models of neurodegenerative diseases. However, it is still unknown whether senescent cell clearance alleviates cognitive dysfunction during the aging process. To investigate this, we first conducted single‐nuclei and single‐cell RNA‐seq in the hippocampus from young and aged mice. We observed an age‐dependent increase in p16^Ink4a senescent cells, which was more pronounced in microglia and oligodendrocyte progenitor cells and characterized by a SASP. We then aged INK‐ATTAC mice, in which p16^Ink4a‐positive senescent cells can be genetically eliminated upon treatment with the drug AP20187 and treated them either with AP20187 or with the senolytic cocktail Dasatinib and Quercetin. We observed that both strategies resulted in a decrease in p16^Ink4a exclusively in the microglial population, resulting in reduced microglial activation and reduced expression of SASP factors. Importantly, both approaches significantly improved cognitive function in aged mice. Our data provide proof‐of‐concept for senolytic interventions'' being a potential therapeutic avenue for alleviating age‐associated cognitive impairment.     

Physiological and molecular determinants of embryo implantation

Embryo implantation involves the intimate interaction between an implantation-competent blastocyst and a receptive uterus, which occurs in a limited time period known as the window of implantation. Emerging evidence shows that defects originating during embryo implantation induce ripple effects with adverse consequences on later gestation events, highlighting the significance of this event for pregnancy success. Although a multitude of cellular events and molecular pathways involved in embryo–uterine crosstalk during implantation have been identified through gene expression studies and genetically engineered mouse models, a comprehensive understanding of the nature of embryo implantation is still missing. This review focuses on recent progress with particular attention to physiological and molecular determinants of blastocyst activation, uterine receptivity, blastocyst attachment and uterine decidualization. A better understanding of underlying mechanisms governing embryo implantation should generate new strategies to rectify implantation failure and improve pregnancy rates in women.     

Understanding of mouse and human bladder at single‐cell resolution: integrated analysis of trajectory and cell‐cell interactive networks based on multiple scRNA‐seq datasets

ObjectivesTo elaborately decipher the mouse and human bladders at single‐cell levels.Materials and MethodsWe collected more than 50,000 cells from multiple datasets and created, up to date, the largest integrated bladder datasets. Pseudotime trajectory of urothelium and interstitial cells, as well as dynamic cell‐cell interactions, was investigated. Biological activity scores and different roles of signaling pathways between certain cell clusters were also identified.ResultsThe glucose score was significantly high in most urothelial cells, while the score of H3 acetylation was roughly equally distributed across all cell types. Several genes via a pseudotime pattern in mouse (Car3, Dkk2, Tnc, etc.) and human (FBLN1, S100A10, etc.) were discovered. S100A6, TMSB4X, and typical uroplakin genes seemed as shared pseudotime genes for urothelial cells in both human and mouse datasets. In combinational mouse (n = 16,688) and human (n = 22,080) bladders, we verified 1,330 and 1,449 interactive ligand‐receptor pairs, respectively. The distinct incoming and outgoing signaling was significantly associated with specific cell types. Collagen was the strongest signal from fibroblasts to urothelial basal cells in mouse, while laminin pathway for urothelial basal cells to smooth muscle cells (SMCs) in human. Fibronectin 1 pathway was intensely sent by myofibroblasts, received by urothelial cells, and almost exclusively mediated by SMCs in mouse bladder. Interestingly, the cell cluster of SMCs 2 was the dominant sender and mediator for Notch signaling in the human bladder, while SMCs 1 was not. The expression of integrin superfamily (the most common communicative pairs) was depicted, and their co‐expression patterns were located in certain cell types (eg, Itgb1 and Itgb4 in mouse and human basal cells).ConclusionsThis study provides a complete interpretation of the normal bladder at single‐cell levels, offering an in‐depth resource and foundation for future research.     

SOX2 plays a crucial role in cell proliferation and lineage segregation during porcine pre‐implantation embryo development

ObjectivesGene regulation in early embryos has been widely studied for a long time because lineage segregation gives rise to the formation of a pluripotent cell population, known as the inner cell mass (ICM), during pre‐implantation embryo development. The extraordinarily longer pre‐implantation embryo development in pigs leads to the distinct features of the pluripotency network compared with mice and humans. For these reasons, a comparative study using pre‐implantation pig embryos would provide new insights into the mammalian pluripotency network and help to understand differences in the roles and networks of genes in pre‐implantation embryos between species.Materials and methodsTo analyse the functions of SOX2 in lineage segregation and cell proliferation, loss‐ and gain‐of‐function studies were conducted in pig embryos using an overexpression vector and the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Then, we analysed the morphological features and examined the effect on the expression of downstream genes through immunocytochemistry and quantitative real‐time PCR.ResultsOur results showed that among the core pluripotent factors, only SOX2 was specifically expressed in the ICM. In SOX2‐disrupted blastocysts, the expression of the ICM‐related genes, but not OCT4, was suppressed, and the total cell number was also decreased. Likewise, according to real‐time PCR analysis, pluripotency‐related genes, excluding OCT4, and proliferation‐related genes were decreased in SOX2‐targeted blastocysts. In SOX2‐overexpressing embryos, the total blastocyst cell number was greatly increased but the ICM/TE ratio decreased.ConclusionsTaken together, our results demonstrated that SOX2 is essential for ICM formation and cell proliferation in porcine early‐stage embryogenesis.     

Deciphering the molecular basis of uterine receptivity

Uterine receptivity is defined as a limited time period during which the uterus enters into an appropriately differentiated state that is ready for the initiation of implantation by competent blastocysts. Although various cellular aspects and molecular pathways involved in uterine receptivity have been identified by gene expression studies and genetically engineered mouse models, a comprehensive understanding of the window of uterine receptivity is still missing. This review focuses on the recent progress in this area, with particular focus on the molecular basis of stromal‐epithelial dialogue and crosstalk between the blastocyst and the uterus during implantation. A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms governing the window of uterine receptivity is hoped to generate new strategies to correct implantation failure and to improve pregnancy rates in women. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 80: 8–21, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Conditional deletion of Msx homeobox genes in the uterus inhibits blastocyst implantation by altering uterine receptivity

An effective bidirectional communication between an implantation-competent blastocyst and the receptive uterus is a prerequisite for mammalian reproduction. The blastocyst will implant only when this molecular cross-talk is established. Here we show that the muscle segment homeobox gene (Msh) family members Msx1 and Msx2, which are two highly conserved genes critical for epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during development, also play crucial roles in embryo implantation. Loss of Msx1/Msx2 expression correlates with altered uterine luminal epithelial cell polarity and affects E-cadherin/β-catenin complex formation through the control of Wnt5a expression. Application of Wnt5a in vitro compromised blastocyst invasion and trophoblast outgrowth on cultured uterine epithelial cells. The finding that Msx1/Msx2 genes are critical for conferring uterine receptivity and readiness to implantation could have clinical significance, because compromised uterine receptivity is a major cause of pregnancy failure in IVF programs.     

Junctional adhesion molecule 2 mediates the interaction between hatched blastocyst and luminal epithelium: induction by progesterone and LIF

Background

Junctional adhesion molecule 2 (Jam2) is a member of the JAM superfamily. JAMs are localized at intercellular contacts and participated in the assembly and maintenance of junctions, and control of cell permeability. Because Jam2 is highly expressed in the luminal epithelium on day 4 of pregnancy, this study was to determine whether Jam2 plays a role in uterine receptivity and blastocyst attachment in mouse uterus.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Jam2 is highly expressed in the uterine luminal epithelium on days 3 and 4 of pregnancy. Progesterone induces Jam2 expression in ovariectomized mice, which is blocked by progesterone antagonist RU486. Jam2 expression on day 4 of pregnancy is also inhibited by RU486 treatment. Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) up-regulates Jam2 protein in isolated luminal epithelium from day 4 uterus, which is blocked by S3I-201, a cell-permeable inhibitor for Stat3 phosphorylation. Under adhesion assay, recombinant Jam2 protein increases the rate of blastocyst adhesion. Both soluble recombinant Jam2 and Jam3 can reverse this process.

Conclusion

Jam2 is highly expressed in the luminal epithelium of receptive uterus and up-regulated by progesterone and LIF via tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat3. Jam2 may play a role in the interaction between hatched blastocyst and receptive uterus.     

Steroids modulate the expression of alpha4 integrin in mouse blastocysts and uterus during implantation

Blastocyst implantation and successful establishment of pregnancy require delicate interactions between the embryo and the maternal uterine milieu, which are controlled at the embryo-maternal interface by the coordinated interplay of a variety of growth factors, cytokines, hormones, and cell adhesion molecules expressed by both the decidualized endometrium and the trophoblast cells. Proper implantation of the embryo is solely dependent on the initial endometrial receptivity and the preparation of the blastocyst to glue itself to the uterine wall. Both these events are considered to be mediated by cell adhesion molecules and integrins expressed by the blastocyst as well by as the maternal endometrium. Integrin expression by the blastocyst and the uterus is a dynamic process. However, reports on the expression and the hormonal modulation of integrins and their role in blastocyst activation and uterine receptivity during implantation are meager. The present study investigates the expression and hormonal regulation of alpha4beta1 integrin by steroid hormones in the blastocyst and the receptive uterus using an in vivo, delayed-implantation mouse model system. The dormant and activated blastocysts as well as the uteri were recovered from ovariectomized mice after progesterone-alone and progesterone-plus-estrogen therapy, respectively. Immunolocalization of protein expression of alpha4 and beta1 integrin subunits indicate that steroids modulate the expression of alpha4beta1 integrin receptor in the mouse blastocyst as well as the uterus and that a differential expression is observed with exposure to progesterone and estrogen. Intrauterine blocking of alpha4 integrin by specific antibody resulted in implantation failure in normal as well as in delayed-implantation mice. Based on our data, we propose here, to our knowledge for the first time, that alpha4beta1 integrin, which is responsible for binding to fibronectin and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, is induced by estradiol and is down-regulated by progesterone in mice during implantation. Furthermore, the results also indicate the direct role of alpha4 integrin in the process of implantation.