Comparison of the subunit organization of early and late replicating chromatin

A comparison was made of the subunit organization of chromatin from regions of the genome with different metaphase chromosome banding characteristics by analyzing the accessibility of early and late replicating DNA in synchronized Chinese hamster ovary cells to digestion with staphylococcal nuclease. Three measures of nuclease susceptibility were employed: (1) the release of acid-soluble material; (2) a digestion index, P, which corresponds to the proportion of internucleosome segments which experienced at least one cleavage event; and (3) the size distribution of DNA fragments isolated from digested chromatin. Little or no difference was observed in the initial rates with which nuclease converted early and late replicating chromatin to acid-soluble material, although the initial digestion rates varied with time of cell collection in the cycle (metaphase > G1 mid-S > late-S or G2). Measurements of the digestion indices of material isolated from interphase cells suggested that initial cleavage events were more rapid in early replicating chromatin than in late replicating chromatin. In contrast, electrophoretic analysis revealed that oligomer DNA fragments from early labelled metaphase chromatin were slightly larger than corresponding fragments from late labelled metaphase chromatin. The size distribution of DNA in submonomer fragments obtained from extensively digested chromatin appeared to be identical regardless of the timing of replication or cell collection. Those small differences in chromatin digestibility that were observed may reflect subtle variations in the accessibility of internucleosome regions or perhaps in the higher-order arrangement of nucleosomes. However, no gross variation in accessibility to staphylococcal nuclease digestion was observed in chromatin localized to metaphase chromosome regions with vastly different cytological staining properties.     

Regulation of mouse satellite DNA replication time.

The satellite DNA sequences located near the centromeric regions of mouse chromosomes replicate very late in S in both fibroblast and lymphocyte cells and are heavily methylated at CpG residues. F9 teratocarcinoma cells, on the other hand, contain satellite sequences which are undermethylated and replicate much earlier in S. DNA methylation probably plays some role in the control of satellite replication time since 5-azacytidine treatment of RAG fibroblasts causes a dramatic temporal shift of replication to mid S. In contrast to similar changes accompanying the inactivation of the X-chromosome, early replication of satellite DNA is not associated with an increase in local chromosomal DNase I sensitivity. Fusion of F9 with mouse lymphocytes caused a dramatic early shift in the timing of the normally late replicating lymphocyte satellite heterochromatin, suggesting that trans-activating factors may be responsible for the regulation of replication timing.     

An isochore transition zone in the NF1 gene region is a conserved landmark of chromosome structure and function

The mammalian genome is organized as a mosaic of isochores, stretches of DNA with a distinct sequence composition. Isochores form the basis of the chromosomal banding pattern, which is tightly correlated with a number of structural and functional features. We have recently demonstrated that the transition from a GC-poor isochore to a GC-rich one in the NF1 gene region occurs within 5 kb and demarcates genomic regions with high and low recombination frequency. We now report that the same transition zone separates early replicating from late replicating chromatin on the molecular level. At the isochore transition the replication fork is stalled in mid-S phase and can be visualized by fiber-FISH techniques as a Y-shaped structure. The switch in GC content and in replication timing is conserved between human and mouse, emphasizing the importance of the transition zones as landmarks of chromosome organization and function.     

Histone hypoacetylation is required to maintain late replication timing of constitutive heterochromatin

The replication of the genome is a spatio-temporally highly organized process. Yet, its flexibility throughout development suggests that this process is not genetically regulated. However, the mechanisms and chromatin modifications controlling replication timing are still unclear. We made use of the prominent structure and defined heterochromatic landscape of pericentric regions as an example of late replicating constitutive heterochromatin. We manipulated the major chromatin markers of these regions, namely histone acetylation, DNA and histone methylation, as well as chromatin condensation and determined the effects of these altered chromatin states on replication timing. Here, we show that manipulation of DNA and histone methylation as well as acetylation levels caused large-scale heterochromatin decondensation. Histone demethylation and the concomitant decondensation, however, did not affect replication timing. In contrast, immuno-FISH and time-lapse analyses showed that lowering DNA methylation, as well as increasing histone acetylation, advanced the onset of heterochromatin replication. While dnmt1(-)(/)(-) cells showed increased histone acetylation at chromocenters, histone hyperacetylation did not induce DNA demethylation. Hence, we propose that histone hypoacetylation is required to maintain normal heterochromatin duplication dynamics. We speculate that a high histone acetylation level might increase the firing efficiency of origins and, concomitantly, advances the replication timing of distinct genomic regions.     

Tel1ATM dictates the replication timing of short yeast telomeres

Telomerase action is temporally linked to DNA replication. Although yeast telomeres are normally late replicating, telomere shortening leads to early firing of subtelomeric DNA replication origins. We show that double‐strand breaks flanked by short telomeric arrays cause origin firing early in S phase at late‐replicating loci and that this effect on origin firing time is dependent on the Tel1^ATM checkpoint kinase. The effect of Tel1^ATM on telomere replication timing extends to endogenous telomeres and is stronger than that elicited by Rif1 loss. These results establish that Tel1^ATM specifies not only the extent but also the timing of telomerase recruitment.     

Late replicating domains are highly recombining in females but have low male recombination rates: implications for isochore evolution

In mammals sequences that are either late replicating or highly recombining have high rates of evolution at putatively neutral sites. As early replicating domains and highly recombining domains both tend to be GC rich we a priori expect these two variables to covary. If so, the relative contribution of either of these variables to the local neutral substitution rate might have been wrongly estimated owing to covariance with the other. Against our expectations, we find that sex-averaged recombination rates show little or no correlation with replication timing, suggesting that they are independent determinants of substitution rates. However, this result masks significant sex-specific complexity: late replicating domains tend to have high recombination rates in females but low recombination rates in males. That these trends are antagonistic explains why sex-averaged recombination is not correlated with replication timing. This unexpected result has several important implications. First, although both male and female recombination rates covary significantly with intronic substitution rates, the magnitude of this correlation is moderately underestimated for male recombination and slightly overestimated for female recombination, owing to covariance with replicating timing. Second, the result could explain why male recombination is strongly correlated with GC content but female recombination is not. If to explain the correlation between GC content and replication timing we suppose that late replication forces reduced GC content, then GC promotion by biased gene conversion during female recombination is partly countered by the antagonistic effect of later replicating sequence tending increase AT content. Indeed, the strength of the correlation between female recombination rate and local GC content is more than doubled by control for replication timing. Our results underpin the need to consider sex-specific recombination rates and potential covariates in analysis of GC content and rates of evolution.     

Relation between the SCE points and the DNA replication bands

A method for obtaining a combination of differential sister chromatid staining and DNA replication banding is described. Using this method the SCE points can be precisely localized to particular bands of individual chromosomes. It was shown, that SCEs occur not only in the regions of early DNA replication bands (=euchromatic segments=negative G-bands), but also in the regions of late DNA replication bands (=heterochromatic segments=positive G-bands). SCEs occurred about three times more frequently in the euchromatic segments than in the heterochromatic segments. Furthermore, more SCEs were observed in the early replicating X-chromosome than in the late replicating X-chromosome.     

Evidence that both G + C rich and G + C poor isochores are replicated early and late in the cell cycle.

Since the G + C content of a gene is correlated to that of the isochore in which it resides, and early replicating isochores are thought to be relatively G + C rich, early replicating genes should also be rich in G + C. This hypothesis is tested on a sample of 44 mammalian genes for which replication time data and sequence information are available. Early replicating genes do not appear to be more G + C rich than late replicating genes, instead there is considerable variation in the G + C content of genes replicated during both halves of S phase. These results show that both G + C rich and poor fractions of the genome are replicated early and late in the cell cycle, and suggest that isochores are not maintained by the replication of DNA sequences in compositionally biased free nucleotide pools.     

Replication timing of two human common fragile sites: FRA1H and FRA2G

The mammalian chromosomes present specific sites of gaps or breaks, the common fragile sites (CFSs), when the cells are exposed to DNA replication stress or to some DNA binding compounds. CFSs span hundreds or thousands of kilobases. The analysis of these sequences has not definitively clarified the causes of their fragility. There is considerable evidence that CFSs are regions of late or slowed replication in the presence of sequence elements that have the propensity to form secondary structures, and that the cytogenetic expression of CFSs may be due to unreplicated DNA. In order to analyse the relationship between DNA replication time and fragility, in this work we have investigated the timing of replication of sequences mapping within two CFSs (FRA1H and FRA2G), of syntenic non-fragile sequences and of early and late replicating control sequences by using fluorescent in situ hybridization on interphase nuclei, conventional fluorescence microscopy and confocal microscopy. Our results indicate that the fragile sequences are slow replicating and that they enter G2 phase unreplicated with very high frequency. Thus these regions could sometimes reach mitosis unreplicated or undercondensed and be expressed as chromosome gaps/breakages.     

DNA replication timing and long-range DNA interactions predict mutational landscapes of cancer genomes

Somatic copy-number alterations (SCNA) are a hallmark of many cancer types, but the mechanistic basis underlying their genome-wide patterns remains incompletely understood. Here we integrate data on DNA replication timing, long-range interactions between genomic material, and 331,724 SCNAs from 2,792 cancer samples classified into 26 cancer types. We report that genomic regions of similar replication timing are clustered spatially in the nucleus, that the two boundaries of SCNAs tend to be found in such regions, and that regions replicated early and late display distinct patterns of frequencies of SCNA boundaries, SCNA size and a preference for deletions over insertions. We show that long-range interaction and replication timing data alone can identify a significant proportion of SCNAs in an independent test data set. We propose a model for the generation of SCNAs in cancer, suggesting that data on spatial proximity of regions replicating at the same time can be used to predict the mutational landscapes of cancer genomes.     

Early S phase DNA replication: A search for targets of carcinogenesis

Our studies have revealed that replicating DNA is more vulnerable to adduction than is non-replicating DNA. Contrary to our expectations that the vulnerability to neoplastic transformation induced by carcinogens in synchronized cells would parallel the rate of DNA replication, we actually found that the vulnerability was notably increased early in the S phase and more closely paralleled the rate of entry of cells into the S phase (the very beginning of S phase) rather than the overall rate of DNA synthesis. From these findings we hypothesized that there were targets for the neoplastic transformation of cells that were among the earliest replicated sequences in the genome. To test that this hypothesis was plausible we investigated the temporal order of DNA replication during the S phase and showed that the order of DNA replication was far more precisely defined than had been recognized previously. The cell synchronization techniques that made those findings possible made it feasible to demonstrate that only a relatively few sites of DNA replication are identifiable in chromosomal bands at the earliest times in the S phase. The same synchronization techniques enabled us to label DNA replicated when populations of cells were very early in S phase and to isolate and clone this DNA. The clonal elements of this library of DNA prepared in this manner have been sequenced and mapped to the human genome. Efforts are in progress to characterize the genes and sequence features associated with these regions. We have utilized methods to identify and characterize origins of DNA replication as a means of locating the earliest replicating part of these early replicating regions. We have identified several new origins of DNA replication that are activated early and late in the S phase but the features of the chromatin at the origin that determines its time of activation remain obscure. In an effort to improve our ability to identify more origins, particularly adjacent origins in genomic regions, we have combined the methods of DNA combing and FISH analysis of combed DNA to search for DNA precursor incorporation patterns characteristic of origins of DNA replication. Preliminary nascent strand abundance studies appear to have proven the existence of two origins of DNA replication predicted from the precursor incorporation studies. We have found that the combed DNA techniques can be combined with precursor incorporation studies and antibodies to sites of DNA damage to address questions of mechanisms of DNA damage and repair. For example these studies have shown recently that DNA damage is not randomly distributed in the genome and that both inhibition of replicon initiation and inhibition of strand elongation are separately distinguishable as components of the S checkpoint function.It is our hope and expectation that these results and the opportunities that they provide for future studies will enable us to identify possible targets for malignant transformation that explain our observation that cells at the start of S phase are vulnerable to the initiation of carcinogenesis.     

The Eukaryotic Mismatch Recognition Complexes Track with the Replisome during DNA Synthesis

During replication, mismatch repair proteins recognize and repair mispaired bases that escape the proofreading activity of DNA polymerase. In this work, we tested the model that the eukaryotic mismatch recognition complex tracks with the advancing replisome. Using yeast, we examined the dynamics during replication of the leading strand polymerase Polε using Pol2 and the eukaryotic mismatch recognition complex using Msh2, the invariant protein involved in mismatch recognition. Specifically, we synchronized cells and processed samples using chromatin immunoprecipitation combined with custom DNA tiling arrays (ChIP-chip). The Polε signal was not detectable in G1, but was observed at active origins and replicating DNA throughout S-phase. The Polε signal provided the resolution to track origin firing timing and efficiencies as well as replisome progression rates. By detecting Polε and Msh2 dynamics within the same strain, we established that the mismatch recognition complex binds origins and spreads to adjacent regions with the replisome. In mismatch repair defective PCNA mutants, we observed that Msh2 binds to regions of replicating DNA, but the distribution and dynamics are altered, suggesting that PCNA is not the sole determinant for the mismatch recognition complex association with replicating regions, but may influence the dynamics of movement. Using biochemical and genomic methods, we provide evidence that both MutS complexes are in the vicinity of the replisome to efficiently repair the entire spectrum of mutations during replication. Our data supports the model that the proximity of MutSα/β to the replisome for the efficient repair of the newly synthesized strand before chromatin reassembles.     

Rif1 regulates the replication timing domains on the human genome

DNA replication is spatially and temporally regulated during S-phase. DNA replication timing is established in early-G1-phase at a point referred to as timing decision point. However, how the genome-wide replication timing domains are established is unknown. Here, we show that Rif1 (Rap1-interacting-factor-1), originally identified as a telomere-binding factor in yeast, is a critical determinant of the replication timing programme in human cells. Depletion of Rif1 results in specific loss of mid-S replication foci profiles, stimulation of initiation events in early-S-phase and changes in long-range replication timing domain structures. Analyses of replication timing show replication of sequences normally replicating early is delayed, whereas that normally replicating late is advanced, suggesting that replication timing regulation is abrogated in the absence of Rif1. Rif1 tightly binds to nuclear-insoluble structures at late-M-to-early-G1 and regulates chromatin-loop sizes. Furthermore, Rif1 colocalizes specifically with the mid-S replication foci. Thus, Rif1 establishes the mid-S replication domains that are restrained from being activated at early-S-phase. Our results indicate that Rif1 plays crucial roles in determining the replication timing domain structures in human cells through regulating higher-order chromatin architecture.     

Evidence for sequential and increasing activation of replication origins along replication timing gradients in the human genome

Genome-wide replication timing studies have suggested that mammalian chromosomes consist of megabase-scale domains of coordinated origin firing separated by large originless transition regions. Here, we report a quantitative genome-wide analysis of DNA replication kinetics in several human cell types that contradicts this view. DNA combing in HeLa cells sorted into four temporal compartments of S phase shows that replication origins are spaced at 40 kb intervals and fire as small clusters whose synchrony increases during S phase and that replication fork velocity (mean 0.7 kb/min, maximum 2.0 kb/min) remains constant and narrowly distributed through S phase. However, multi-scale analysis of a genome-wide replication timing profile shows a broad distribution of replication timing gradients with practically no regions larger than 100 kb replicating at less than 2 kb/min. Therefore, HeLa cells lack large regions of unidirectional fork progression. Temporal transition regions are replicated by sequential activation of origins at a rate that increases during S phase and replication timing gradients are set by the delay and the spacing between successive origin firings rather than by the velocity of single forks. Activation of internal origins in a specific temporal transition region is directly demonstrated by DNA combing of the IGH locus in HeLa cells. Analysis of published origin maps in HeLa cells and published replication timing and DNA combing data in several other cell types corroborate these findings, with the interesting exception of embryonic stem cells where regions of unidirectional fork progression seem more abundant. These results can be explained if origins fire independently of each other but under the control of long-range chromatin structure, or if replication forks progressing from early origins stimulate initiation in nearby unreplicated DNA. These findings shed a new light on the replication timing program of mammalian genomes and provide a general model for their replication kinetics.     

GENETIC VARIATION AND DNA REPLICATION TIMING,OR WHY IS THERE LATE REPLICATING DNA?

Mutation rates vary significantly within the genome and across species. Recent studies revealed a long suspected replication-timing effect on mutation rate, but the mechanisms that regulate the increase in mutation rate as the genome is replicated remain unclear. Evidence is emerging, however, that DNA repair systems, in general, are less efficient in late replicating heterochromatic regions compared to early replicating euchromatic regions of the genome. At the same time, mutation rates in both vertebrates and invertebrates have been shown to vary with generation time (GT). GT is correlated with genome size, which suggests a possible nucleotypic effect on species-specific mutation rates. These and other observations all converge on a role for DNA replication checkpoints in modulating generation times and mutation rates during the DNA synthetic phase (S phase) of the cell cycle. The following will examine the potential role of the intra-S checkpoint in regulating cell cycle times (GT) and mutation rates in eukaryotes. This article was published online on August 5, 2011. An error was subsequently identified. This notice is included in the online and print versions to indicate that both have been corrected October 4, 2011.