The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of lung cancer in lifelong non-smokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke. DESIGN: Analysis of 37 published epidemiological studies of the risk of lung cancer (4626 cases) in non-smokers who did and did not live with a smoker. The risk estimate was compared with that from linear extrapolation of the risk in smokers using seven studies of biochemical markers of tobacco smoke intake. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Relative risk of lung cancer in lifelong non-smokers according to whether the spouse currently smoked or had never smoked. RESULTS: The excess risk of lung cancer was 24% (95% confidence interval 13% to 36%) in non-smokers who lived with a smoker (P < 0.001). Adjustment for the effects of bias (positive and negative) and dietary confounding had little overall effect; the adjusted excess risk was 26% (7% to 47%). The dose-response relation of the risk of lung cancer with both the number of cigarettes smoked by the spouse and the duration of exposure was significant. The excess risk derived by linear extrapolation from that in smokers was 19%, similar to the direct estimate of 26%. CONCLUSION: The epidemiological and biochemical evidence on exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, with the supporting evidence of tobacco specific carcinogens in the blood and urine of non-smokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke, provides compelling confirmation that breathing other people''s tobacco smoke is a cause of lung cancer.     

Smoking-related DNA adducts in anal epithelium

Several studies have identified tobacco smoking as a risk factor for anal cancer in both women and men. Samples of anal epithelium from haemorrhoidectomy specimens from current smokers (n = 20) and age-matched life-long non-smokers (n = 16) were analysed for DNA adducts by the nuclease P(1) digestion enhancement procedure of 32P-postlabelling analysis. The study included 14 men and 22 women. Both qualitative and quantitative differences in the adduct profiles were observed between the smokers and non-smokers. The mean adduct level was significantly higher in the smokers than in the non-smokers (1.88 +/- 0.71) (S.D.) versus 1.36 +/- 0.60 adducts per 10(8) nucleotides, P = 0.02, two-tailed unpaired t-test with Welch's correction); furthermore, the adduct pattern seen in two-dimensional chromatograms revealed the smoking-related diagonal radioactive zone in 17/20 smokers, but not in any of the non-smokers (P < 0.00001, Fisher's exact test). These results indicate that components of tobacco smoke inflict genotoxic damage in the anal epithelium of smokers and provide a plausible mechanism for a causal association between smoking and anal cancer.     

Does breathing other people's tobacco smoke cause lung cancer?

The available epidemiological studies of lung cancer and exposure to other people''s tobacco smoke, in which exposure was assessed by whether or not a person classified as a non-smoker lived with a smoker, were identified and the results combined. There were 10 case-control studies and three prospective studies. Overall, there was a highly significant 35% increase in the risk of lung cancer among non-smokers living with smokers compared with non-smokers living with non-smokers (relative risk 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 1.54). Part of this increase was almost certainly caused by the misclassification of some smokers as non-smokers. As smokers, who are more likely to get lung cancer than non-smokers, tend to live with smokers this misclassification probably exaggerated the estimated increase in risk. Adjustment for this error reduced the estimate to 30% (relative risk 1.30), but as people who live with non-smokers may still be exposed to other people''s smoke this estimate was revised again to allow for the fact that a truly unexposed reference group was not used. The increase in risk among non-smokers living with smokers compared with a completely unexposed group was thus estimated as 53% (relative risk of 1.53). This analysis, and the fact that non-smokers breathe environmental tobacco smoke, which contains carcinogens, into their lungs and that the generally accepted view is that there is no safe threshold for the effect of carcinogens, leads to the conclusion that breathing other people''s tobacco smoke is a cause of lung cancer. About a third of the cases of lung cancer in non-smokers who live with smokers, and about a quarter of the cases in non-smokers in general, may be attributed to such exposure.     

Smoking-related DNA adducts in anal epithelium

Several studies have identified tobacco smoking as a risk factor for anal cancer in both women and men. Samples of anal epithelium from haemorrhoidectomy specimens from current smokers (n=20) and age-matched life-long non-smokers (n=16) were analysed for DNA adducts by the nuclease P₁ digestion enhancement procedure of ³²P-postlabelling analysis. The study included 14 men and 22 women. Both qualitative and quantitative differences in the adduct profiles were observed between the smokers and non-smokers. The mean adduct level was significantly higher in the smokers than in the non-smokers (1.88±0.71 (S.D.) versus 1.36±0.60 adducts per 10⁸ nucleotides, P=0.02, two-tailed unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction); furthermore, the adduct pattern seen in two-dimensional chromatograms revealed the smoking-related diagonal radioactive zone in 17/20 smokers, but not in any of the non-smokers (P<0.00001, Fisher’s exact test). These results indicate that components of tobacco smoke inflict genotoxic damage in the anal epithelium of smokers and provide a plausible mechanism for a causal association between smoking and anal cancer.     

Chromosome aberrations among cigarette smokers in Colombia

Worldwide, the annual morbimortality caused by cigarette smoking is a major public health concern. In Colombia, up to 33% of the adult population has smoked at some point in life, raising important national issues on the disease burden from tobacco. The aim of this study was to establish whether cigarette smoking increases the frequency of chromosome aberrations (CA) in peripheral blood lymphocytes of smokers (n = 52) compared with non-smokers (n = 52) in Popayán, Colombia. After signing a consent form, volunteers provided a blood sample (20 ml) to establish cell cultures at 52 h. For CA analysis, 100 complete metaphase cells from each subject were evaluated. The CA frequency was significantly higher in smokers (8.38 +/- 0.61) than in non-smokers (3.13 +/- 0.29), showing the highest number of CA (14.83 +/- 1.01) among heavy smokers (>20 pack-years). Interestingly, light smokers (< or =10 pack-years) also showed a significant increase in CA when compared to non-smokers (6.62 +/- 0.53 versus 3.13 +/- 0.29, P < 0.01, respectively). In addition, a significant positive correlation was found between the frequency of CA and the intensity of smoking in pack-years (R2 = 0.60). Our study indicates that the genotoxic effects in lymphocytes from smokers are most likely caused by cigarette smoke constituents, providing scientific evidence to encourage national campaigns to prevent tobacco consumption.     

Prospective study of effect of switching from cigarettes to pipes or cigars on mortality from three smoking related diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the extent to which cigarette smokers who switch to cigars or pipes alter their risk of dying of three-smoking related diseases-lung cancer, ischaemic heart disease, and chronic obstructive lung disease. DESIGN: A prospective study of 21520 men aged 35-64 years when recruited in 1975-82 with detailed history of smoking and measurement of carboxyhaemoglobin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Notification of deaths (to 1993) classified by cause. RESULTS: Pipe and cigar smokers who had switched from cigarettes over 20 years before entry to the study smoked less tobacco than cigarette smokers (8.1 g/day v 20 g/day), but they had the same consumption as pipe and cigar smokers who had never smoked cigarettes (8.1 g) and had higher carboxyhaemoglobin saturations (1.2% v 1.0%, P < 0.001), indicating that they inhaled tobacco smoke to a greater extent. They had a 51% higher risk of dying of the three smoking related diseases than pipe or cigar smokers who had never smoked cigarettes (relative risk 1.51; 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 2.38), a 68% higher risk than lifelong non-smokers (1.68; 1.16 to 2.45), a 57% higher risk than former cigarette smokers who gave up smoking over 20 years before entry (1.57; 1.04 to 2.38), and a 46% lower risk than continuing cigarette smokers (0.54; 0.38 to 0.77). CONCLUSION: Cigarette smokers who have difficulty in giving up smoking altogether are better off changing to cigars or pipes than continuing to smoke cigarettes. Much of the effect is due to the reduction in the quantity of tobacco smoked, and some is due to inhaling less. Men who switch do not, however, achieve the lower risk of pipe and cigar smokers who have never smoked cigarettes. All pipe and cigar smokers have a greater risk of lung cancer than lifelong non-smokers or former smokers.     

Genotoxicity of environmental tobacco smoke: a review

Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), or second-hand smoke, is a widespread contaminant of indoor air in environments where smoking is not prohibited. It is a significant source of exposure to a large number of substances known to be hazardous to human health. Numerous expert panels have concluded that there is sufficient evidence to classify involuntary smoking (or passive smoking) as carcinogenic to humans. According to the recent evaluation by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, involuntary smoking causes lung cancer in never-smokers with an excess risk in the order of 20% for women and 30% for men. The present paper reviews studies on genotoxicity and related endpoints carried out on ETS since the mid-1980s. The evidence from in vitro studies demonstrates induction of DNA strand breaks, formation of DNA adducts, mutagenicity in bacterial assays and cytogenetic effects. In vivo experiments in rodents have shown that exposure to tobacco smoke, whole-body exposure to mainstream smoke (MS), sidestream smoke (SS), or their mixture, causes DNA single strand breaks, aromatic adducts and oxidative damage to DNA, chromosome aberrations and micronuclei. Genotoxicity of transplacental exposure to ETS has also been reported. Review of human biomarker studies conducted among non-smokers with involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke indicates presence of DNA adducts, urinary metabolites of carcinogens, urinary mutagenicity, SCEs and hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) gene mutations (in newborns exposed through involuntary smoking of the mother). Studies on human lung cancer from smokers and never-smokers involuntarily exposed to tobacco smoke suggest occurrence of similar kinds of genetic alterations in both groups. In conclusion, these overwhelming data are compatible with the current knowledge on the mechanisms of carcinogenesis of tobacco-related cancers, occurring not only in smokers but with a high biological plausibility also in involuntary smokers.     

Population burden of lung cancer due to environmental tobacco smoke

The population burden of lung cancer due to environmental tobacco smoke is significant because a large fraction of the population is exposed. The risks are, of course, lower than those to smokers themselves; but smoking is self-inflicted, passive smoking is involuntary. Making various assumptions, the proportion of lung cancer cases among non-smokers that could reasonably be attributed to environmental tobacco smoke can be calculated to be about 20–30% in western countries. Thus, non-smokers in the society could benefit considerably from diminishing exposures to other people's smoke.     

Influence of glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms on genotoxic effects induced by tobacco smoke

Genotoxicity of tobacco smoke has long been investigated and tobacco smoke is considered to be one of the principal human carcinogens. Although its role in DNA-damage induction and cancer development has been documented, the mechanisms by which this happens are not well understood. Many chemical constituents of tobacco smoke are enzymatically metabolized by phase-I and phase-II enzymes, but modifications in coding and regulating sequences of these genes could influence their ability to detoxify these compounds. In this work, we studied several enzymes involved in the metabolism of xenobiotics, viz. the glutathione S-transferases (GST) M1, T1, P1 and A1, with respect to their influence on the genotoxic effects induced by cigarette smoking. We assessed the genotoxic effects of tobacco smoke on peripheral blood lymphocytes of 72 healthy caucasians by use of the chromosomal aberration (CA) assay and the micronucleus (MN) test. Genotypes of GST M1, T1, P1 and A1 were determined by means of the polymerase chain reaction and methods based on restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). We found that smoke and gender are the two variables that most influence the DNA damage. In particular, we observed that female smokers seem to be more sensitive than male smokers, having a significantly higher frequency of CAs. Moreover, a significant increase in frequency of micronuclei in bi-nucleated cells (BNMN) was found in smokers, but not in non-smokers. This increase seems to be influenced not only by age and gender, but also by genetic constitution. Subjects carrying GSTM1-null genotype seemed to have an higher susceptibility to DNA damage induced by tobacco smoke than GSTM1-positive ones. When considering a combination of GST genotypes, we found a lower BNMN frequency in subjects with GSTP1 variant allele plus GSTM1-positive genotypes, while the most damaged cells are found in subjects bearing GSTM1-null plus GSTP1-wild type. Our results suggest that investigation of the association between several gene polymorphisms and important endpoints of DNA damage could contribute to better understanding the role of gene-gene interaction.     

Genotoxicity of tobacco smoke and tobacco smoke condensate: a review

This report reviews the literature on the genotoxicity of mainstream tobacco smoke and cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) published since 1985. CSC is genotoxic in nearly all systems in which it has been tested, with the base/neutral fractions being the most mutagenic. In rodents, cigarette smoke induces sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) and micronuclei in bone marrow and lung cells. In humans, newborns of smoking mothers have elevated frequencies of HPRT mutants, translocations, and DNA strand breaks. Sperm of smokers have elevated frequencies of aneuploidy, DNA adducts, strand breaks, and oxidative damage. Smoking also produces mutagenic cervical mucus, micronuclei in cervical epithelial cells, and genotoxic amniotic fluid. These data suggest that tobacco smoke may be a human germ-cell mutagen. Tobacco smoke produces mutagenic urine, and it is a human somatic-cell mutagen, producing HPRT mutations, SCEs, microsatellite instability, and DNA damage in a variety of tissues. Of the 11 organ sites at which smoking causes cancer in humans, smoking-associated genotoxic effects have been found in all eight that have been examined thus far: oral/nasal, esophagus, pharynx/larynx, lung, pancreas, myeoloid organs, bladder/ureter, uterine cervix. Lung tumors of smokers contain a high frequency and unique spectrum of TP53 and KRAS mutations, reflective of the PAH (and possibly other) compounds in the smoke. Further studies are needed to clarify the modulation of the genotoxicity of tobacco smoke by various genetic polymorphisms. These data support a model of tobacco smoke carcinogenesis in which the components of tobacco smoke induce mutations that accumulate in a field of tissue that, through selection, drive the carcinogenic process. Most of the data reviewed here are from studies of human smokers. Thus, their relevance to humans cannot be denied, and their explanatory powers not easily dismissed. Tobacco smoke is now the most extreme example of a systemic human mutagen.     

O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) in normal tissues and tumors: Enzyme activity, promoter methylation and immunohistochemistry

O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is a suicide enzyme that repairs the pre-mutagenic, pre-carcinogenic and pre-toxic DNA damage O(6)-methylguanine. It also repairs larger adducts on the O(6)-position of guanine, such as O(6)-[4-oxo-4-(3-pyridyl)butyl]guanine and O(6)-chloroethylguanine. These adducts are formed in response to alkylating environmental pollutants, tobacco-specific carcinogens and methylating (procarbazine, dacarbazine, streptozotocine, and temozolomide) as well as chloroethylating (lomustine, nimustine, carmustine, and fotemustine) anticancer drugs. MGMT is therefore a key node in the defense against commonly found carcinogens, and a marker of resistance of normal and cancer cells exposed to alkylating therapeutics. MGMT also likely protects against therapy-related tumor formation caused by these highly mutagenic drugs. Since the amount of MGMT determines the level of repair of toxic DNA alkylation adducts, the MGMT expression level provides important information as to cancer susceptibility and the success of therapy. In this article, we describe the methods employed for detecting MGMT and review the literature with special focus on MGMT activity in normal and neoplastic tissues. The available data show that the expression of MGMT varies greatly in normal tissues and in some cases this has been related to cancer predisposition. MGMT silencing in tumors is mainly regulated epigenetically and in brain tumors this correlates with a better therapeutic response. Conversely, up-regulation of MGMT during cancer treatment limits the therapeutic response. In malignant melanoma, MGMT is not related to the therapeutic response, which is due to other mechanisms of inherent drug resistance. For most cancers, studies that relate MGMT activity to therapeutic outcome following O(6)-alkylating drugs are still lacking.     

Repair of O(6)-methylguanine is not affected by thymine base pairing and the presence of MMR proteins

Methylation at the O(6)-position of guanine (O(6)-MeG) by alkylating agents is efficiently removed by O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), preventing from cytotoxic, mutagenic, clastogenic and carcinogenic effects of O(6)-MeG-inducing agents. If O(6)-MeG is not removed from DNA prior to replication, thymine will be incorporated instead of cytosine opposite the O(6)-MeG lesion. This mismatch is recognized and processed by mismatch repair (MMR) proteins which are known to be involved in triggering the cytotoxic and genotoxic response of cells upon methylation. In this work we addressed three open questions. (1) Is MGMT able to repair O(6)-MeG mispaired with thymine (O(6)-MeG/T)? (2) Do MMR proteins interfere with the repair of O(6)-MeG/T by MGMT? (3) Does MGMT show a protective effect if it is expressed after replication of DNA containing O(6)-MeG? Using an in vitro assay we show that oligonucleotides containing O(6)-MeG/T mismatches are as efficient as oligonucleotides containing O(6)-MeG/C in competing for MGMT repair activity, indicating that O(6)-MeG mispaired with thymine is still subject to repair by MGMT. The addition of MMR proteins from nuclear extracts, or of recombinant MutSalpha, to the in vitro repair assay did not affect the repair of O(6)-MeG/T lesions by MGMT. This indicates that the presence of MutSalpha still allows access of MGMT to O(6)-MeG/T lesions. To elucidate the protective effect of MGMT in the first and second replication cycle after N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) treatment, MGMT transfected CHO cells were synchronized and MGMT was inactivated by pulse-treatment with O(6)-benzylguanine (O(6)-BG). Thereafter, the recovered cells were treated with MNNG and subjected to clonogenic survival assays. Cells which expressed MGMT in the first and second cell cycle were more resistant than cells which expressed MGMT only in the second (post-treatment) cell cycle. Cells which did not express MGMT in both cell cycles were most sensitive. This indicates that repair of O(6)-MeG can occur both in the first and second cell cycle after alkylation protecting cells from the killing effect of the lesion.     

Biomonitoring of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS)-related exposure to 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK)

The exposure of non-smokers to the tobacco-specific N-nitrosamine 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK), a rodent lung carcinogen, was determined in the air of various indoor environments as well as by biomonitoring of non-smokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) under real-life conditions using the urinary NNK metabolites 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) and [4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)but-1-yl]-beta-O-D-glucosiduronic acid (NNAL-Gluc). NNK was not detectable (&lt;0.5 ng m^-3) in 11 rooms in which smoking did not occur. The mean NNK concentration in 19 rooms in which smoking took place was 17.5 (2.4-50.0) ng m^-3. The NNK levels significantly correlated with the nicotine levels (r=0.856; p&lt; 0.0001). Of the 29 non-smokers investigated, 12 exhibited no detectable NNAL and NNAL-Gluc excretion (&lt;3 pmol day) in their urine. The mean urinary excretion of NNAL and NNAL-Gluc of the 17 remaining non-smokers was 20.3 (&lt;3-63.2) and 22.9 (&lt;3-90.0) pmol day^-1, respectively. Total NNAL excretion (NNAL+NNAL-Gluc) in all non-smokers investigated significantly correlated with the amount of nicotine on personal samplers worn during the week prior to urine collection (r=0.88; &lt;0.0001) and with the urinary cotinine levels (r=0.40; p=0.038). No correlation was found between NNAL excretion and the reported extent of ETS exposure. Average total NNAL excretion in the non-smokers with detectable NNAL levels was 74 times less than in 20 smokers who were also investigated. The cotinine/total NNAL ratios in urine of smokers (9900) and non-smokers (9300) were similar. This appears to be at variance with the ratios of the corresponding precursors (nicotine/NNK) in mainstream smoke (16400) and ETS (1000). Possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed. The possible role of NNK as a lung carcinogen in non-smokers is unclear, especially since NNK exposure in non-smokers is several orders of magnitude lower than the ordinary exposure to exogenous and endogenous N-nitrosamines and the role of NNK as a human lung carcinogen is not fully understood.     

Harmful health effects of cigarette smoking

This is a comprehensive review on the harmful health effects of cigarette smoking. Tobacco smoking is a reprehensible habit that has spread all over the world as an epidemic. It reduces the life expectancy among smokers. It increases overall medical costs and contributes to the loss of productivity during the life span. Smoking has been shown to be linked with various neurological, cardiovascular, and pulmonary diseases. Cigarette smoke not only affects the smokers but also contributes to the health problems of the non-smokers. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke contributes to health problems in children and is a significant risk factor for asthma. Cigarette smoke contains several carcinogens that alter biochemical defense systems leading to lung cancer.     

The effect of the trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) in plasma on the formation of 4-aminobiphenylhaemoglobin adducts in smokers

Smokers are exposed to a number of carcinogenic compounds including aromatic amines such as 4-aminobiphenyl. Antioxidants are thought to be involved in the defence against the damaging effect of such carcinogens. Recently it has been shown that plasma antioxidant status in smokers is diminished compared with non-smokers. In this study we investigated in 40 smokers whether the trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) in plasma could be quantitatively related to exposure to cigarette smoke. The biomarkers 4-aminobiphenylhaemoglobin (4-ABP-Hb) adduct and cotinine were determined as indices of cigarette smoke exposure. A correlation between 4-ABP-Hb adduct levels and plasma cotinine levels was found for the whole population studied, who smoked 4-70 cigarettes per day (n = 40, r² = 0.12, p = 0.03). A significant inverse relationship was found between TEAC and 4-ABP-Hb levels (n = 40, r² = 0.17, p = 0.008). Multiple regression analysis showed a strong relationship between 4-ABP-Hb levels and plasma TEAC and cotinine levels (n = 40, r² =0.29, p = 0.002). These findings provide strong evidence that the 4- ABP-Hb adduct represents a valuable biomarker of (internal) exposure to tobacco smoke, and also that the formation of this marker is dependent on the plasma antioxidant status. The multiple regression analysis results show that the measure of effect (4-ABP-Hb adduct formation) is largely determined by dose (cotinine) and protection (TEAC).     

Determination of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in urine of smokers and non-smokers

Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines (TSNA) include 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK), N′-nitrosonornicotine (NNN), N′-nitrosoanabasine (NAB) and N′-nitrosoanatabine (NAT) and are found in tobacco and tobacco smoke. TSNA are of interest for biomonitoring of tobacco-smoke exposure as they are associated with carcinogenesis. Both NNK and NNN are classified by IARC as Group 1 carcinogens. Samples of 24?h urine collections (n?=?108) were analysed from smokers and non-smokers, using a newly developed and validated LC-MS/MS method for determining total 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL, the major metabolite of NNK), and total NNN, NAB and NAT. TSNA levels in smokers’ urine were significantly higher than in non-smokers. In smokers, urinary excretion of total TSNA correlated significantly (r?>?0.5) with markers of smoking dose, such as daily cigarette consumption, salivary cotinine and urinary nicotine equivalents and increased with the ISO tar yield of cigarettes smoked. The correlation between urinary total NNN and the smoking dose was weaker (r?=?0.4–0.5). In conclusion, this new method is suitable for assessing tobacco use-related exposure to NNK, NNN, NAB and NAT.     

Estimation of urinary cotinine cut-off points distinguishing non-smokers, passive and active smokers

An objective assessment of exposure to tobacco smoke may be accomplished by means of examining particular biomarkers in body fluids. The most common biomarker of tobacco smoke exposure is urinary, or serum, cotinine. In order to distinguish non-smokers from passive smokers and passive smokers from active smokers, it is necessary to estimate cotinine cut-off points. The objective of this article was to apply statistical distribution of urinary cotinine concentration to estimate cut-off points distinguishing the three above-mentioned groups. The examined group consisted of 327 volunteers (187 women and 140 men) who were ethnically homogenous inhabitants of the same urban agglomeration (Sosnowiec, Poland). The values which enabled differentiation of the examined population into groups and subgroups were as follows: 50 µg l^-1 (differentiation of non-smokers from passive smokers), 170 µg l^-1 (to divide the group of passive smokers into two subgroups: minimally and highly exposed to environmental tobacco smoke), 550 µg l^-1 (differentiation of passive smokers from active smokers), and 2100 µg l^-1 (to divide group of active smokers into two subgroups: minimally and highly exposed to tobacco smoke). The results suggest that statistical distribution of urinary cotinine concentration is useful for estimating urinary cotinine cut-off points and for assessing the smoking status of persons exposed to tobacco smoke.     

Dental Health in Smokers with and without COPD

The association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and periodontal disease is sparsely studied. The aim was to describe the co-variation of periodontitis and lung function impairment in smokers. The hypothesis was that the destructive processes in the mouth and the lungs are interdependent due to a general individual susceptibility to detrimental effects of tobacco smoke. Smokers with COPD (n = 28) stage II and III according to GOLD guidelines and smokers without COPD (n = 29) and healthy non-smokers (n = 23) participated in the study. The groups of smokers were matched for cumulative exposure to tobacco smoke. Radiographic, general and dental clinical examination, lung function measurements and quality of life (SF-36) assessment were conducted. The relationship between respiratory and dental outcomes was analyzed. Dental health, assessed by plaque, gingival bleeding, periodontal pocket depth and loss of teeth was impaired in the smokers compared with non-smokers with no major differences between smokers with and without COPD. There was, however, a weak correlation between periodontitis and emphysema/impaired diffusion capacity. Impaired quality of life was associated with smoking and impaired lung function but not influenced by dental status. In conclusion periodontitis was strongly associated with smoking, weakly associated with lung tissue destruction and very weakly or even not at all associated with chronic airflow limitation. The results indicate that, although there was a co-variation between periodontitis and pathologic lung processes in smokers, the risk of developing COPD, as defined by spirometric outcomes, is not associated with the risk of impaired dental health in smokers.     

Lung cancer risk and variation in MGMT activity and sequence

O(6)-Alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (MGMT) repairs DNA adducts that result from alkylation at the O(6) position of guanine. These lesions are mutagenic and toxic and can be produced by a variety of agents including the tobacco-specific nitrosamines, carcinogens present in cigarette smoke. Here, we review some of our work in the context of inter-individual differences in MGMT expression and their potential influence on lung cancer risk. In humans there are marked inter-individual differences in not only levels of DNA damage in the lung (N7-methylguanine) that can arise from exposure to methylating agents but also in MGMT activity in lung tissues. In the presence of such exposure, this variability in MGMT activity may alter cancer susceptibility, particularly as animal models have demonstrated that the complete absence of MGMT activity predisposes to alkylating-agent induced cancer while overexpression is protective. Recent studies have uncovered a series of polymorphisms that affect protein activity or are associated with differences in expression levels. The associations between these (and other) polymorphisms and cancer risk are inconsistent, possibly because of small sample sizes and inter-study differences in lung cancer histology. We have recently analysed a consecutive series of case-control studies and found evidence that lung cancer risk was lower in subjects with the R178 allele.