A Human Health Risk Assessment Software for Facilitating Management of Urban Contaminated Sites: A Case Study: The Massa Site,Tuscany, Italy

The goal of this article is to present the Human Health Risk Assessment (HRA) software developed as one of the NORISC ^{1 1}NORISC is the acronym of the project “Network Oriented Risk assessment by In-situ Screening of Contaminated sites” realized under under the 5th European Union Community Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities. View all notes decision support software system components that could be used as a tool for facilitating management of urban contaminated sites. The NORISC-HRA software provides sufficient technical and procedural support to conduct a simple site-specific risk assessment. The employed HRA methodology is generally based on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) procedures. The software determines the level and spatial distribution of human health risks at a given site and sets up site-specific preliminary Health-Based Remedial Goals (HBRGs)/Risk-Based Concentrations (RBCs) for soil and groundwater. The NORISC-HRA software is recommended for use when national soil and groundwater limit values are exceeded. Exposure pathways considered in this software are associated with three land use patterns—residential, industrial/commercial, and recreational. The aricle also presents the software testing results obtained at one of the NORISC test sites—the Massa site (Avenza-Carrara, Tuscany, Italy). Findings of the HRA indicated that the contaminated soil at the Massa test site might pose potential cancer and non-cancer risks to industrial workers in its present condition. Arsenic was the dominant substance responsible for most of the baseline risk and at the RBC of 1.77 mg/kg it was the primary driver of remedial decisions at the Massa site.     

Assessment of Health Protectiveness of the Risk-Based Soil Remediation Standards of the Midwestern States

In the last decade, risk-based remediation following a framework similar to risk-based correction action (RBCA) has gained acceptance across the country and generic/Tier 1 Risk-Based Action Limits (RBALs) for hundreds of chemicals have been tabulated. However, there have been only a few studies that focused on understanding the causes of discrepancy among cleanup standards and policies of the hazardous waste programs among the states. This study aims to fill this critical need by examining the basis of generic (i.e., Tier 1) residential RBALs developed by the states, which are within the regulatory domain of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Region 5. Specifically, we seek to investigate the approaches/methodologies and the policy/technical rationale used in establishing RBALs, along with degree of inconsistency, and the causes and implications of inconsistencies. In addition, we developed RBALs for a case study site using both deterministic and probabilistic risk assessment approaches and compared these against RBALs developed by the states to infer about public health-protectiveness of the state-specific RBALs. We found three- and four-order-of magnitude difference among state RBALs for PAHs and VOCs, respectively. The degree of clean up deemed appropriate under Tier 1 evaluation by the midwestern states significantly differ from one another, which has both public health and economic implications.     

Comparative Study between CalTOX and Soil Screening Levels Modeling Approaches

A comparison was made between two different approaches to environmental modeling and risk assessment, specifically the one-medium approach of the USEPA Soil Screening Levels (SSL) and the multimedia approach in the CalEPA (CalTOX). Eleven priority pollutants were selected to represent different classes of chemicals as per their toxicity, physical and chemical properties, and persistence in the environment. Benzene, dioxin, PCB, B(a)P, chlo-rdane, chloroform, and TCE represent carcinogens, while xylene, toluene, phenol, chlordane, pyrene, TCE, and chloroform represent noncarcinogens. The highly volatile contaminants, including benzene, chloroform, xylene, toluene, and TCE, were selected to compare the volatilization from soil and the significance of inhalation pathways of the two models. The contaminants with strong sorption to soil and dust particles (dioxin, B(a)P, PCB, and chlordane) exhibited a preferential soil ingestion pathway. In contrast with CalTOX, inhalation was not considered as the dominant pathway for all the volatile contaminants in SSL. Furthermore, the risk assessment component of CalTOX accounts for multiple pathways as a consequence of its multimedia representation. Because the two models were based on different approaches, it is expected that the results would be different. For example, the results of the SSL were more conservative compared with CalTOX for all 11 chemicals. This observation still holds when considering the total risk from CalTOX vs. the risk based on the dominant pathway in SSL. Finally, the cancer slope factors and references doses were not the same for all the chemicals used in this study and resulted in different risk estimates.     

Derivation of Risk Management Criteria for Chemicals of Unknown Toxic Potency at Contaminated Sites

Environmental investigations of former industrial sites often detect the presence of chemicals for which no soil criteria exist and for which regulatory agencies have not derived estimates of toxic potency. This poses a considerable problem for making informed risk management decisions involving sites where such chemicals are present. As a result, a methodology has been developed for making risk-based decisions for chemicals of unknown toxic potency in soil at contaminated sites. The method is based on principles and procedures used by the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA), the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). After analyzing the data on hundreds of carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic substances, the USFDA and other leading researchers have concluded that, if no toxicological data is available on a chemical, exposures less than 1.5?µg/person/day (i.e., 0.02?µg/kg body weight/day) are unlikely to result in appreciable health risks even if the substance was later found to be a carcinogen. To develop maximum soil concentrations that will be protective of human health (i.e., Risk Management Criteria or RMC), the above exposure limit of 0.02?µg/kg body weight/day has been assumed to be protective of risks from exposure to chemicals lacking toxicological data. Using a stochastic risk assessment model for estimating exposures to chemicals from contaminated sites, our analyses indicate that a soil concentration of 2?µg/g would be protective of human health for land uses that include residential, commercial, and industrial development provided no major indirect pathways exist at the site. If indirect pathways exists (e.g., vapor infiltration of soil gases, uptake of chemicals into garden produce, etc.), alternate RMC could be developed, that include such indirect pathways, using the methodology provided in this paper. Used by experienced risk assessors, the approach is a scientifically defensible screening method that will preclude many chemicals from unnecessary evaluation, while allowing risk assessors to focus efforts on chemicals of greater concern and make informed risk management decisions.     

TOPSIS-Based Screening Method of Soil Remediation Technology for Contaminated Sites and its Application

A soil remediation technology screening system has not yet been established in China, and the existing supporting conditions for soil remediation technology cannot meet the supervision needs of contaminated sites’ remediation. Considering the soil remediation technology screening methods for contaminated sites in developed countries and the supervision requirements of contaminated sites in China, this article briefly introduces the main characteristics of decision-making methods, and the screening indices, including technical, economic, social, and environmental factors, are suggested. The technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) was used to establish a screening process for soil remediation technology, and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method was utilized to obtain the weights of the screening indices. Tthe suggested screening method was then applied in a chromite ore-processing residue site in China, and suitable remediation technology (in-situ chemical reduction-oxidation) was proposed. The research results could provide scientific and technological support for the supervision of contaminated sites in China.     

A Deterministic Method for Deriving Site-Specific Human Health Assessment Criteria for Contaminants in Soil

A method for deriving Site-Specific Assessment Criteria (SSAC) for use when considering risk to human health from chronic exposure to heavy metals (except lead), metalloids, and organic substances in soil, with application to the United Kingdom (UK), is described. The SSAC represents the soil concentration above which an unacceptable risk to human health may be indicated.

The method considers the UK standard land uses (residential with and without plant uptake, allotment gardens, and commercial/industrial) by applying the default exposure factors and algorithms provided. Non-standard land uses can be also considered. Site-specific determinations of contaminant bioaccessibility or of plant-to-soil concentration factors may be used if available.

The method adopts the risk-based source-pathway-receptor pollutant linkage framework and a deterministic methodology. Exposure pathways considered are direct ingestion of soil and dust, consumption of home grown or allotment vegetables, ingestion of soil attached to such vegetables, inhalation of soil vapors outdoors and inhalation of soil vapors indoors. A test for the significance of the dermal pathway is also included.

It is not intended that the method be used to generate or replace UK Soil Guideline Values, because this can only be done by the appropriate authoritative bodies within the UK (Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Environment Agency).     

Spatial Assessment of Heavy Metals in Surface Soil from Klang District (Malaysia): An Example from a Tropical Environment

Heavy metals (Al, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Zn) in surface soil of Klang district were determined and multivariate analysis was used to understand their potential sources. The total and bioavailability of concentrations were used in identifying the potential risks to the ecology and human health. The means for the total heavy metal concentrations were found to be in the order of Fe > Al > Zn > Pb > Cu > Cr > Co > Cd, while the means for the bioavailability concentrations were found to be in the order of Al > Fe > Zn > Cu > Co > Cd > Pb > Cr. Principal Component Analysis showed Principal Component 1 as being of natural origin whereas Principal Components 2, 3, and 4 were associated with mixed anthropogenic sources, such as traffic and industrial emissions, organic matter, and granulometric fractions. Potential ecological risk assessment indicated an overall low ecological risk. Spatial assessment of non-carcinogenic risks showed that the Hazard Index values were more than one in Johan Setia, due to biomass burning of peat swamps exploited for agricultural development. While for spatial assessment of carcinogenic risks, the Lifetime Cancer Risk values were in the limit (1 × 10^?5), indicating low cancer inducing risks. Nevertheless, with intense development pressure in the Klang district could overlap pollution inputs in the future.     

Assessment of Potential Human Health Risks from Arsenic in CCA-Treated Wood

Chromated copper arsenate (CCA) is a chemical preservative used to treat wood for a variety of outdoor uses, including decks, fencing, and play structures. This article describes a methodology to quantify exposures to arsenic from CCA-treated wood. Exposure was evaluated for ingestion and dermal contact with arsenic-containing residue on treated wood surfaces (dislodgeable arsenic), and ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation of soil containing arsenic originating from treated wood structures. Standard approaches were used to quantify exposures to arsenic in soil. In the absence of standard approaches for exposures to dislodgeable residue, an empirical approach was developed, extrapolating from studies of soil loadings on hands and soil ingestion rates to estimate the amount of dislodgeable residue on hands that is subsequently ingested. Results from animal studies were used to develop relative bioavailability estimates for dislodgeable and soil arsenic. A focused sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the assumptions used regarding hand loading and subsequent incidental ingestion of dislodgeable arsenic had the most significant impact on the results. This assessment indicates low uptake of arsenic into the body, resulting in incremental lifetime cancer risks within USEPA's target risk levels. We compare this approach to other methodologies used to assess exposures to treated wood.     

Plan for an Integrated Human and Environmental Risk Assessment in the S. Domingos Mine Area (Portugal)

The need for the integration of the assessment of human and ecological risks in contaminated areas, such as derelict mines, widely increases. The risk assessment process is becoming a powerful tool to provide sound scientific bases for decision-making processes. In Portugal, the risk assessment process is in its early years and the lack of multidisciplinary teams of experts is frequently mentioned as the main obstacle to its implementation. Therefore, the majority of the reclamation actions are based on impact assessment studies that usually are characterized by few biological and toxicological considerations. In order to account for some of these constraints, the ecological risk assessment framework proposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was used to plan the assessment of human and ecological risks posed by the high concentrations of metals scattered in the vicinity of S. Domingos mine, a cuprous pyrite mine located in the Southeast Alentejo (Portugal). This study presents the problem formulation phase of the assessment. It includes all the scientific information available for the area, a conceptual model, and an analysis plan for the risk assessment process. Following a tiered approach, several tasks were planned in order to acquire chemical, toxicological, and ecological information, in order to compensate for the lack of toxicity data for site-specific species.     

An Approach for Incorporating Information on Chemical Availability in Soils into Risk Assessment and Risk-Based Decision Making,Prepared by: The New England Environmentally Acceptable Endpoints Workgroup

A regional workgroup comprised of individuals from regulatory agencies, uni versities, and consulting companies was formed to develop an approach for incor porating information on chemical availability in soils into risk assessment and risk based decision making. The approach consists of the following decision framework for including information on chemical availability: (1) Determine the usefulness of incorporating information on bioavailability; (2) Identify information needs from a conceptual model of exposure for the site and from exposure pathways judged critical to the assessment; (3) Identify soil factors that affect bioavailability; (4) Determine the type or form of information (measures and/or models) that can be used within the risk assessment and risk management process; (5) Select methods (measures and/or models) based on the “weight of evidence” or strength of the bioavailability information they will provide and how that information will be used for risk assessment and risk based decision making; (6) Incorporate information into the risk assessment and risk based decision making. These fac tors can be integrated into existing risk based approaches for site management such as Superfund, state approaches, and the ASTM Risk Based Corrective Action Process (RBCA). Consistent with risk assessment guidance, an assessment of chemical availability in soils must consider current as well as reasonably foresee able conditions. The approach recognizes that information on chemical availabil ity is contextual and depends on the receptor and pathway. Further, the value of information depends on how well it is accepted and/or validated for use in regulatory decision making. The workgroup identified four principles for select ing methods (measures and/or models) for obtaining information on chemical availability and for evaluating information on chemical availability for use in risk assessments: (1) soil chemical relevance, (2) pathway relevance, (3) receptor relevance, and (4) acceptance of the method.     

Bioavailability of Metals in Soil and Health Risk Assessment for Populations Near an Indian Chromite Mine Area

Soils contaminated with toxic metals may be environmental hazards and sources of exposure to human population. Soils in mining areas are among the most heavily contaminated by metals from the mining activity. This study was focused on metals of interest in bioavailability studies using single and sequential extraction methods. Results of geochemical fractionation suggest that changes in soil characteristics may enhance the mobilization of Cu, Cr, Zn, and Al. The observed metals’ availability pattern was Cr > Cu > Zn > Al. However, the pattern of total contents of metals in soils was Al > Cr > Zn > Cu. Risks to human adults and children from selected metals through soil ingestion was assessed in terms of incremental lifetime average daily dose (LADD), hazard quotient (HQ), and hazard index (HI). The estimated LADDs and HI were within acceptable reference doses and less than 1, respectively, indicating low risk to human populations from the studied metals through soil ingestion in the studied mine area. The generated data may be useful in remediation of contaminated soils with metals.     

Lack of Complete Exposure Pathways for Metals in Natural and FGD Gypsum

Use of wallboard made from synthetic gypsum generated via flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) by coal-fired power plants (FGD gypsum) raised questions concerning the potential for exposure to residual trace metals. Because gypsum is widely used (e.g., in wallboard), any issue with metals could have far-reaching implications. A conceptual site model evaluated potential human health exposure pathways for metals in gypsum, through consideration of data for 21 metals including samples of natural (mined) gypsum, and of FGD gypsum. Because there are no screening values for gypsum, comparisons were made to background soil concentrations and to risk-based concentrations for metals in soil termed preliminary remedial action goals (PRGs), which assume more frequent and prolonged contact with particulate soil than would be likely for gypsum, and thus provide a health protective means for evaluation of exposure. Additional screenings evaluated occupational exposure and agricultural use of gypsum. Maximum metal concentrations in natural and FGD gypsum samples were either consistent with background concentrations or much lower than PRGs for residential or agricultural soil, or workplace air, and thus exposure pathways for these media were considered incomplete. Separate analyses of mercury volatilization were conducted, and this pathway was also found to be incomplete.     

Metals that Drive Health-Based Remedial Decisions for Soils at U.S. Department of Defense Sites

This study was undertaken to establish which metals are most likely to drive the risk-based remedial decision-making process at those U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) sites that are affected by metals in site soils. Our approach combined queries of various databases, interviews with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) experts in each Region, and communication with database administrators and DoD personnel. The databases that were used were comprehensive for DoD sites, yet sometimes contained inaccuracies. Metal concentration data for various DoD facilities were screened against established regulatory criteria for both human health and ecological endpoints. Results from this analysis were compared against the information gleaned from the interviews. This preliminary analysis indicates that the five metals that most frequently exceeded risk-based screening criteria for potential human health concerns at DoD sites, in descending order of frequency, are lead, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and antimony. The metals that most frequently exceeded ecological screening criteria, in order, are lead, cadmium, mercury, zinc, arsenic, chromium, and selenium. Although the majority of USEPA personnel interviewed indicated that human health risk, rather than ecological endpoints, generally drives remedial decision-making, the data indicated that ecological screening thresholds were exceeded more often than human health standards.     

Using the RESRAD Code to Assess Human Exposure Risk to 226Ra, 232Th,and 40K in Soil

This article evaluates the health risk raised by exposure to naturally occurring radionuclides in soil around Khak-Sefid, Ramsar, Iran, which is an area of high natural background radiation. A high purity germanium detector was used to determine levels of radionuclides in soil samples and the cancer morbidity risk for a hypothetical resident farmer was evaluated using the RESidual RADioactivity (RESRAD) code. The average activity concentrations of ²²⁶Ra, ²³²Th, and ⁴⁰K were found to be 13,201 ± 391, 27.9 ± 2.4, and 415.5 ± 16 Bq/kg, respectively. The maximum assessed cancer morbidity risks were calculated from external and internal exposure pathways as 4.73 × 10^?2 and 3.40 × 10^?2 for ²²⁶Ra, 1.41 × 10^?4 and 7.88 × 10^?5 for ²³²Th, and 1.3 × 10^?4 and 4.233 × 10^?4 for ⁴⁰K. The RESRAD calculations also showed total cancer morbidity risks from external gamma and plant ingestion pathways were more important than from other exposure pathways. A sensitivity analysis was also performed to determine the input parameter values in the risk assessment process. In general, due to the high calculated risk of ²²⁶Ra compared with ²³²Th and ⁴⁰K it can be the major source of concern for human heath in the study area.     

Ecotoxicity Test Data for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil: Plants and Soil-Dwelling Invertebrates

Ecotoxicity benchmarks for petroleum mixtures can be used in a screening-level ecological risk assessment. Data from studies evaluating the toxicity of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) to plants and soil invertebrates were reviewed for possible application to soil benchmark development. Toxicity data included LOAECs; estimated EC25s, EC20s, and LC50s; effective concentrations that caused greater than a 20% level of effect; and NOAECs. The variabilities in petroleum material, chemical analytical methodology, age of hydrocarbon-soil contact, nutrient amendment, and measured effects levels did not permit much meaningful aggregation of the data. Tenth, twenty-fifth, and fiftieth percentiles of toxicity and no-effects data are presented for unaggregated results within studies. Effects on invertebrates often occurred at concentrations of TPH lower than those associated with effects on plants. Lighter mixtures generally were associated with lower ranges of effects concentrations than heavier crude oil. Few aged and non-aged samples were available from the same study, and these did not show obvious trends regarding toxicity. Similarly, the addition of nutrients to promote bioremediation was not observed across studies to alter effective or nontoxic concentrations in a systematic way. Existing toxicity data are not sufficient to establish broadly applicable TPH ecotoxicity screening benchmarks with much confidence, even for specific mixtures.     

Physiological Daily Inhalation Rates for Free-Living Individuals Aged 1 Month to 96 Years,Using Data from Doubly Labeled Water Measurements: A Proposal for Air Quality Criteria,Standard Calculations and Health Risk Assessment

Reported disappearance rates of oral doses of doubly labeled water (²H₂O and H₂ ¹⁸O) in urine, monitored by gas-isotope-ratio mass spectrometry for an aggregate period of over 30,000 days and completed with indirect calorimetry and nutritional balance measurements, have been used to determine physiological daily inhalation rates for 2210 individuals aged 3 weeks to 96 years. Rates in m³/kg-day for healthy normal-weight individuals (n = 1252) were higher by 6 to 21% compared to their overweight/obese counterparts (n = 679). Rates for healthy normal-weight males and females drop by about 66 to 75% within the course of a lifetime. Infants and children between the age of 3 weeks to less than 7 years inhale 1.6 to 4.3 times more air (0.395 ± 0.048 to 0.739 ± 0.071 m³/kg-day, mean ± S.D., n = 581) than adults aged 23 to 96 years (0.172 ± 0.037 to 0.247 ± 0.039 m³/kg-day, n = 388). The 99th percentile rate of 0.725 m³/kg-day based on measurements for boys aged 2.6 to less than 6 months is recommended for air quality criteria and standard calculation for non-carcinogenic compounds pertaining to individuals of any age or gender (normality confirmed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, p ≥ 0.05). This rate is 2.5-fold more protective than the daily inhalation estimate of 0.286 m³/kg-day published by the Federal Register in 1980 (i.e., 20 m³/day for a 70-kg adult). It ensures that very few newborns aged 1 month and younger, less than 1% of infants aged 2.6 to less than 6 months and of course no older individuals up to 96 years of age inhale more toxic chemicals than associated safe doses which are not anticipated to result in any adverse effects in humans, when air concentration reaches the resulting air quality criteria and standard values. This rate is also protective for underweight, overweight, and obese individuals. Finally, as far as newborns are concerned, a rate of 0.956 m³/kg-day based on the 99th percentile estimates is recommended for short-term criteria and standard calculations for toxic chemicals that yield adverse effects over instantaneous to short-term duration.