Domain rearrangement of SRP protein Ffh upon binding 4.5S RNA and the SRP receptor FtsY

The signal recognition particle (SRP) mediates membrane targeting of translating ribosomes displaying a signal-anchor sequence. In Escherichia coli, SRP consists of 4.5S RNA and a protein, Ffh, that recognizes the signal peptide emerging from the ribosome and the SRP receptor at the membrane, FtsY. In the present work, we studied the interactions between the NG and M domains in Ffh and their rearrangements upon complex formation with 4.5S RNA and/or FtsY. In free Ffh, the NG and M domains are facing one another in an orientation that allows cross-linking between positions 231 in the G domain and 377 in the M domain. There are binding interactions between the two domains, as the isolated domains form a strong complex. The interdomain contacts are disrupted upon binding of Ffh to 4.5S RNA, consuming a part of the total binding energy of 4.5S RNA-Ffh association that is roughly equivalent to the free energy of domain binding to each other. In the SRP particle, the NG domain binds to 4.5S RNA in a region adjacent to the binding site of the M domain. Ffh binding to FtsY also requires a reorientation of NG and M domains. These results suggest that in free Ffh, the binding sites for 4.5S RNA and FtsY are occluded by strong domain-domain interactions which must be disrupted for the formation of SRP or the Ffh-FtsY complex.     

Conformational changes in the bacterial SRP receptor FtsY upon binding of guanine nucleotides and SRP

In cotranslational preprotein targeting in Escherichia coli, the signal recognition particle (SRP) binds to the signal peptide emerging from the ribosome and, subsequently, interacts with the signal recognition particle receptor, FtsY, at the plasma membrane. Both FtsY and the protein moiety of the signal recognition particle, Ffh, are GTPases, and GTP is required for the formation of the SRP-FtsY complex. We have studied the binding of GTP/GDP to FtsY as well as the SRP-FtsY complex formation by monitoring the fluorescence of tryptophan 343 in the I box of mutant FtsY. Thermodynamic and kinetic parameters of the FtsY complexes with GDP, GTP, and signal recognition particle are reported. Upon SRP-FtsY complex formation in the presence of GTP, the fluorescence of tryptophan 343 increased by 50 % and was blue-shifted by 10 nm. We conclude that GTP-dependent SRP-FtsY complex formation leads to an extensive conformational change in the I box insertion in the effector region of FtsY.     

Role of SRP RNA in the GTPase cycles of Ffh and FtsY.

The bacterial homologues of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor, the Ffh*4.5S RNA ribonucleoprotein complex and the FtsY protein, respectively, form a unique complex in which both Ffh and FtsY act as GTPase activating proteins for one another, resulting in the mutual stimulation of GTP hydrolysis by both proteins. Previous work showed that 4.5S RNA enhances the GTPase activity in the presence of both Ffh and FtsY, but it was not clear how this was accomplished. In this work, kinetic and thermodynamic analyses of the GTPase reactions of Ffh and FtsY have provided insights into the role of 4.5S RNA in the GTPase cycles of Ffh and FtsY. We found that 4.5S RNA accelerates the association between Ffh and FtsY 400-fold in their GTP-bound form, analogous to its 200-fold catalytic effect on Ffh*FtsY association previously observed with the GppNHp-bound form [Peluso, P., et al. (2000) Science 288, 1640-1643]. Further, Ffh-FtsY association is rate-limiting for the observed GTPase reaction with subsaturating Ffh and FtsY, thereby accounting for the apparent stimulatory effect of 4.5S RNA on the GTPase activity observed previously. An additional step, GTP hydrolysis from the Ffh*FtsY complex, is also moderately facilitated by 4.5S RNA. These results suggest that 4.5S RNA modulates the conformation of the Ffh*FtsY complex and may, in turn, regulate its GTPase activity during the SRP functional cycle.     

Solution structure of a GAAG tetraloop in helix 6 of SRP RNA from Pyrococcus furiosus

The NMR structure of a 12-mer RNA derived from the helix 6 of SRP RNA from Pyrococcus furiosus, whose loop-closing base pair is U.G, was determined, and the structural and thermodynamic properties of the RNA were compared with those of a mutant RNA with the C:G closing base pair. Although the structures of the two RNAs are similar to each other and adopt the GNRR motif the conformational stabilities are significantly different to each other It was suggested that weaker stacking interaction of the GAAG loop with the U:G closing base pair in 12-mer RNA causes the lower conformational stability.     

Demonstration of a multistep mechanism for assembly of the SRP x SRP receptor complex: implications for the catalytic role of SRP RNA

Two GTPases in the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor (SR) control the delivery of newly synthesized proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum or plasma membrane. During the protein targeting reaction, the 4.5S SRP RNA accelerates the association between the two GTPases by 400-fold. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer, we demonstrate here that formation of a stable SRP·SR complex involves two distinct steps: a fast initial association between SRP and SR to form a GTP-independent early complex and then a GTP-dependent conformational rearrangement to form the stable final complex. We also found that the 4.5S SRP RNA significantly stabilizes the early GTP-independent intermediate. Furthermore, mutational analyses show that there is a strong correlation between the ability of the mutant SRP RNAs to stabilize the early intermediate and their ability to accelerate SRP·SR complex formation. We propose that the SRP RNA, by stabilizing the early intermediate, can give this transient intermediate a longer life time and therefore a higher probability to rearrange to the stable final complex. This provides a coherent model that explains how the 4.5S RNA exerts its catalytic role in SRP·SR complex assembly.     

Analysis of Escherichia coli 4.5S RNA binding affinity to Ffh and EF-G

Escherichia coli 4.5S RNA is a member of the signal recognition particle RNA family that binds to Ffh and EF-G proteins in vivo. To assess the binding affinity of E. coli 4.5S RNA, wild-type Ffh and a series of amino terminal truncated EF-G mutants with a histidine tag were over-expressed in Escherichia coli and purified. Among them, EF-G mutants with a deletion of all upstream sequences up to and including the second or the third GTP binding sequence element were expressed at high levels and bound with the same activity as wild-type EF-G. Nitrocellulose filter binding assays revealed that the binding affinity values (M(1/2)) for Ffh and EF-G, defined as the concentration giving half-maximal binding, were 0.15 microM and 1.5 microM, respectively. Moreover, we also show that very little EF-G can form a stable complex with 4.5S RNA in vivo, whereas almost all Ffh binds to 4.5S RNA.     

Solution structure of a SRP19 binding domain in human SRP RNA

Assembly of the human signal recognition particle (SRP) requires SRP19 protein to bind to helices 6 and 8 of SRP RNA. In the present study, structure of a 29-mer RNA composing the SRP19 binding site in helix 6 was determined by NMR spectroscopy. The two A:C mismatches were continuously stacked to each other and formed wobble type A:C base pairs. The GGAG tetraloop in helix 6 was found to adopt a similar conformation to that of GNRA tetraloop, suggesting that these tetraloops are included in an extensive new motif GNRR. Compared with the crystal structure of helix 6 in complex with SRP19 determined previously, the GGAG tetraloop in the complex was found to adopt a similar conformation to the free form, although the loop structure becomes more open upon SRP19 binding. Thus, SRP19 is thought to recognize the overall fold of the GGAG loop.     

Solution structure of a GAAA tetraloop receptor RNA.

The GAAA tetraloop receptor is an 11-nucleotide RNA sequence that participates in the tertiary folding of a variety of large catalytic RNAs by providing a specific binding site for GAAA tetraloops. Here we report the solution structure of the isolated tetraloop receptor as solved by multidimensional, heteronuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The internal loop of the tetraloop receptor has three adenosines stacked in a cross-strand or zipper-like fashion. This arrangement produces a high degree of base stacking within the asymmetric internal loop without extrahelical bases or kinking the helix. Additional interactions within the internal loop include a U. U mismatch pair and a G.U wobble pair. A comparison with the crystal structure of the receptor RNA bound to its tetraloop shows that a conformational change has to occur upon tetraloop binding, which is in good agreement with previous biochemical data. A model for an alternative binding site within the receptor is proposed based on the NMR structure, phylogenetic data and previous crystallographic structures of tetraloop interactions.     

Minimal functional structure of Escherichia coli 4.5 S RNA required for binding to elongation factor G

Escherichia coli cells contain abundant amounts of metabolically stable 4.5 S RNA. Consisting of 114 nucleotides, 4.5 S RNA is structurally homologous to mammalian 7 S RNA, and it plays an essential role in targeting proteins containing signal peptide to the secretory apparatus by forming an signal recognition-like particle with Ffh protein. It also binds independently to protein elongation factor G (EF-G) and functions in the translation process. This RNA contains a phylogenetically conserved RNA domain, the predicted secondary structure of which consists of a hairpin motif with two bulges. We examined the binding activity of mutants with systematic deletions to define the minimal functional interaction domain of 4.5 S RNA that interacts with EF-G. This domain consisted of 35-nucleotides extending from 36 to 70 nucleotides of mature 4.5 S RNA and contained two conserved bulges in which mutations of A47, A60, G61, C62, A63, and A67 diminished binding to EF-G, whereas those at A39, C40, C41, A42, G48, and G49 did not affect binding. These data suggested that the 10 nucleotides in 4.5 S RNA, which are conserved between 4.5 S RNA and 23 S rRNA, have a key role for EF-G binding. Based on the NMR-derived structure of mutant A47U, we further verified that substituting U at A47 causes striking structural changes and the loss of the symmetrical bulge. These results indicate the mechanism by which EF-G interacts with 4.5 S RNA and the importance of the bulge structure for EF-G binding.     

Evidence for coupling of membrane targeting and function of the signal recognition particle (SRP) receptor FtsY

Recent studies have indicated that FtsY, the signal recognition particle receptor of Escherichia coli, plays a central role in membrane protein biogenesis. For proper function, FtsY must be targeted to the membrane, but its membrane-targeting pathway is unknown. We investigated the relationship between targeting and function of FtsY in vivo, by separating its catalytic domain (NG) from its putative targeting domain (A) by three means: expression of split ftsY, insertion of various spacers between A and NG, and separation of A and NG by in vivo proteolysis. Proteolytic separation of A and NG does not abolish function, whereas separation by long linkers or expression of split ftsY is detrimental. We propose that proteolytic cleavage of FtsY occurs after completion of co-translational targeting and assembly of NG. In contrast, separation by other means may interrupt proper synchronization of co-translational targeting and membrane assembly of NG. The co-translational interaction of FtsY with the membrane was confirmed by in vitro experiments.     

Fluorescence-detected assembly of the signal recognition particle: binding of the two SRP protein heterodimers to SRP RNA is noncooperative.

Protein-RNA and protein-protein interactions involved in the assembly of the signal recognition particle (SRP) were examined using fluorescence spectroscopy. Fluorescein was covalently attached to the 3'-terminal ribose of SRP RNA following periodate oxidation, and the resulting SRP RNA-Fl was reconstituted into a fluorescent SRP species that was functional in promoting translocation of secretory proteins across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum. Each of the two protein heterodimers purified from SRP elicited a substantial change in fluorescein emission upon association with the modified RNA. The binding of SRP9/14 to singly-labeled SRP RNA-Fl increased fluorescein emission intensity by 41% at pH 7.5 and decreased its anisotropy from 0.18 to 0.16. The binding of SRP68/72 increased the fluorescein anisotropy from 0.18 to 0.23 but did not alter the emission intensity of SRP RNA-Fl. These fluorescence changes did not result from a direct interaction between the dye and protein because the fluorescein remained accessible to both iodide ions and fluorescein-specific antibodies in the complexes. The spectral changes were elicited by specific SRP RNA-protein interactions, since (i) the SRP9/14- and SRP68/72-dependent changes were unique, (ii) an excess of unlabeled SRP RNA, but not of tRNA, blocked the fluorescence changes, and (iii) no emission changes were observed when SRP RNA-Fl was titrated with other RNA-binding proteins. Each heterodimer bound tightly to the RNA, since the Kd values determined spectroscopically and at equilibrium for the SRP9/14 and the SRP68/72 complexes with SRP RNA-Fl were less than 0.1 and 7 +/- 3 nM, respectively. The binding affinity of SRP68/72 for SRP RNA-Fl was unaffected by the presence of SRP9/14, and hence the binding of the heterodimers to SRP RNA is noncooperative in the absence of SRP54 and SRP19. The SRP protein heterodimers therefore associate randomly and independently with SRP RNA to form domains in the particle that are distinct both structurally and functionally. Any cooperativity in SRP assembly would have to be mediated by SRP54 and/or SRP19.     

Crystal structure of SRP19 in complex with the S domain of SRP RNA and its implication for the assembly of the signal recognition particle

The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a ribonucleoprotein particle involved in GTP-dependent translocation of secretory proteins across membranes. In Archaea and Eukarya, SRP19 binds to 7SL RNA and promotes the incorporation of SRP54, which contains the binding sites for GTP, the signal peptide, and the membrane-bound SRP receptor. We have determined the crystal structure of Methanococcus jannaschii SRP19 bound to the S domain of human 7SL RNA at 2.9 A resolution. SRP19 clamps the tetraloops of two branched helices (helices 6 and 8) and allows them to interact side by side. Helix 6 acts as a splint for helix 8 and partially preorganizes the binding site for SRP54 in helix 8, thereby facilitating the binding of SRP54 in assembly.     

A basic region neighboring the lysine-rich C-terminus of protein SRP19 is required for binding to signal recognition particle RNA.

To identify some of the determinants in the 19-kilodalton protein of signal recognition particle (SRP19) for binding to signal recognition particle RNA, two mutant derivatives of the SRP19 were constructed, lacking 14 and 24 C-terminal amino acids. Polypeptides were transcribed and translated in vitro and tested for their ability to bind to signal recognition particle RNA by retention of protein-RNA complexes on DEAE-Sepharose. Both mutant polypeptides form complexes with the RNA, demonstrating that the 24 C-terminal amino acids, which include a lysine-rich sequence at positions 136-144, are dispensable. A third mutant polypeptide, in which eight additional amino acids were removed by oligonucleotide-directed digestion of the mRNA, was unable to bind. The amino acids in the sequence PKLKTRTQ correspond to positions 113-120; they are suggested to be involved in interaction with signal recognition particle RNA.     

Structure of the GMPPNP-stabilized NG domain complex of the SRP GTPases Ffh and FtsY

Ffh and FtsY are GTPase components of the signal recognition particle co-translational targeting complex that assemble during the SRP cycle to form a GTP-dependent and pseudo twofold symmetric heterodimer. Previously the SRP GTPase heterodimer has been stabilized and purified for crystallographic studies using both the non-hydrolysable GTP analog GMPPCP and the pseudo-transition state analog GDP:AlF4, revealing in both cases a buried nucleotide pair that bridges and forms a key element of the heterodimer interface. A complex of Ffh and FtsY from Thermus aquaticus formed in the presence of the analog GMPPNP could not be obtained, however. The origin of this failure was previously unclear, and it was thought to have arisen from either instability of the analog, or, alternatively, from differences in its interactions within the tightly conscribed composite active site chamber of the complex. Using insights gained from the previous structure determinations, we have now determined the structure of the SRP GTPase targeting heterodimer stabilized by the non-hydrolysable GTP analog GMPPNP. The structure demonstrates how the different GTP analogs are accommodated within the active site chamber despite slight differences in the geometry of the phosphate chain. It also reveals a K+ coordination site at the highly conserved DARGG loop at the N/G interdomain interface.     

A ribonuclease-resistant region of 5S RNA and its relation to the RNA binding sites of proteins L18 and L25.

An RNA fragment, constituting three subfragments of nucleotide sequences 1-11, 69-87 and 89-120, is the most ribonuclease-resistant part of the native 5S RNA of Escherichia coli, at 0 degrees C. A smaller fragment of nucleotide sequence 69-87 and 90-110 is ribonuclease-resistant at 25 degrees. Degradation of the L25-5S RNA complex with ribonuclease A or T2 yielded RNA fragments similar to those of the free 5S RNA at 0 degrees C and 25 degrees C; moreover L25 remained strongly bound to both RNA fragments and also produced some opening of the RNA structure in at least two positions. Protein L18 initially protected most of the 5S RNA against ribonuclease digestion, at 0 degrees C, but was then gradually released prior to the formation of the larger RNA fragment. It cannot be concluded, therefore, as it was earlier (Gray et al., 1973), that this RNA fragment contains the primary binding site of L18.     

Nucleotide sequence of 7 S RNA. Homology to Alu DNA and La 4.5 S RNA

7 S RNA, a component of normal higher eukaryotic cells and several oncornaviruses, was shown to be conserved in evolution (Erikson, E., Erikson, R. L., Henry, B., and Pace, N. R. (1973) Virology 53, 40-46). Recently, 7 S RNA was shown to be partially complementary to Alu family DNA sequences (Weiner, A. (1980) Cell 22, 209-218). In the present study the nucleotide sequence of Novikoff hepatoma 7 S RNA was determined to be: (formula, see text) Comparison of 7 S RNA, Alu and B1 family DNA, and La 4.5 S RNA sequences for homologies showed that 1) one-third of 7 S RNA, mainly the 5'-end, was homologous to Alu and B1 family sequences; 2) one 300-nucleotide long Alu family sequence contained two binding sites for 7 S RNA; and 3) the 5'-ends of 7 S RNA and La 4.5 S RNA also had extensive (60%) homologies. A model for the secondary structure of 7 S RNA based on maximal base pairing and preferential nuclease cleavage sites is also presented.     

Characterization of an RNA receptor motif that recognizes a GCGA tetraloop

Tertiary interactions between a new RNA motif and RNA tetraloops were analyzed to determine whether this new motif shows preference for a GCGA tetraloop. In the structural context of a ligase ribozyme, this motif discriminated GCGA loop from 3 other tetraloops. The affinity between the GCGA loop and its receptor is strong enough to carry out the ribozyme activity.     

Protein SRP68 of human signal recognition particle: identification of the RNA and SRP72 binding domains

The signal recognition particle (SRP) plays an important role in the delivery of secretory proteins to cellular membranes. Mammalian SRP is composed of six polypeptides among which SRP68 and SRP72 form a heterodimer that has been notoriously difficult to investigate. Human SRP68 was purified from overexpressing Escherichia coli cells and was found to bind to recombinant SRP72 as well as in vitro-transcribed human SRP RNA. Polypeptide fragments covering essentially the entire SRP68 molecule were generated recombinantly or by proteolytic digestion. The RNA binding domain of SRP68 included residues from positions 52 to 252. Ninety-four amino acids near the C terminus of SRP68 mediated the binding to SRP72. The SRP68-SRP72 interaction remained stable at elevated salt concentrations and engaged approximately 150 amino acids from the N-terminal region of SRP72. This portion of SRP72 was located within a predicted tandem array of four tetratricopeptide (TPR)-like motifs suggested to form a superhelical structure with a groove to accommodate the C-terminal region of SRP68.