Epigenetic differences between sister chromatids?

Semi-conservative replication ensures that the DNA sequence of sister chromatids is identical except for replication errors and variation in the length of telomere repeats resulting from replicative losses and variable end processing. What happens with the various epigenetic marks during DNA replication is less clear. Many chromatin marks are likely to be copied onto both sister chromatids in conjunction with DNA replication, whereas others could be distributed randomly between sister chromatids. Epigenetic differences between sister chromatids could also emerge in a more predictable manner, for example, following processes that are associated with lagging strand DNA replication. The resulting epigenetic differences between sister chromatids could result in different gene expression patterns in daughter cells. This possibility has been difficult to test because techniques to distinguish between parental sister chromatids require analysis of single cells and are not obvious. Here, we briefly review the topic of sister chromatid epigenetics and discuss how the identification of sister chromatids in cells could change the way we think about asymmetric cell divisions and stochastic variation in gene expression between cells in general and paired daughter cells in particular.     

A matter of choice: the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion

Sister chromatid cohesion is the basis for the recognition of chromosomal DNA replication products for their bipolar segregation in mitosis. Fundamental to sister chromatid cohesion is the ring‐shaped cohesin complex, which is loaded onto chromosomes long before the initiation of DNA replication and is thought to hold replicated sister chromatids together by topological embrace. What happens to cohesin when the replication fork approaches, and how cohesin recognizes newly synthesized sister chromatids, is poorly understood. The characterization of a number of cohesion establishment factors has begun to provide hints as to the reactions involved. Cohesin is a member of the evolutionarily conserved family of Smc subunit‐based protein complexes that contribute to many aspects of chromosome biology by mediating long‐range DNA interactions. I propose that the establishment of cohesion equates to the selective stabilization of those cohesin‐mediated DNA interactions that link sister chromatids in the wake of replication forks.     

分离酶的作用及其调节

姐妹染色单体的分离是一精确时空调控事件,分离的紊乱会造成遗传物质传递的不稳定,从而可能引起严重的后果-细胞或个体的死亡或病态。在真核生物细胞中,一种比较保守的机制调控着姐妹染色单体的分离:随DNA复制过程建立由黏合素维持的姐妹染色单体的结合,在有丝分裂中期向后期转变过程中,随保全素的降解,分离酶发挥活性,裂解黏合素一个亚单位,促成黏合素蛋白质复合体的解离和姐妹染色单体的分离。     

Random homologous pairing and incomplete sister chromatid alignment are common in angiosperm interphase nuclei

The chromosome arrangement in interphase nuclei is of growing interest, e.g., the spatial vicinity of homologous sequences is decisive for efficient repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination, and close alignment of sister chromatids is considered as a prerequisite for their bipolar orientation and subsequent segregation during nuclear division. To study the degree of homologous pairing and of sister chromatid alignment in plants, we applied fluorescent in situ hybridisation with specific bacterial artificial chromosome inserts to interphase nuclei. Previously we found in Arabidopsis thaliana and in A. lyrata positional homologous pairing at random, and, except for centromere regions, sister chromatids were frequently not aligned. To test whether these features are typical for higher plants or depend on genome size, chromosome organisation and/or phylogenetic affiliation, we investigated distinct individual loci in other species. The positional pairing of these loci was mainly random. The highest frequency of sister alignment (in >93% of homologues) was found for centromeres, some rDNA and a few other high copy loci. Apparently, somatic homologous pairing is not a typical feature of angiosperms, and sister chromatid aligment is not obligatory along chromosome arms. Thus, the high frequency of chromatid exchanges at homologous positions after mutagen treatment needs another explanation than regular somatic pairing of homologues (possibly an active search of damaged sites for homology). For sister chromatid exchanges a continuous sister chromatid alignment is not required. For correct segregation, permanent alignment of sister centromeres is sufficient.     

Pds5 is required for homologue pairing and inhibits synapsis of sister chromatids during yeast meiosis

During meiosis, homologues become juxtaposed and synapsed along their entire length. Mutations in the cohesin complex disrupt not only sister chromatid cohesion but also homologue pairing and synaptonemal complex formation. In this study, we report that Pds5, a cohesin-associated protein known to regulate sister chromatid cohesion, is required for homologue pairing and synapsis in budding yeast. Pds5 colocalizes with cohesin along the length of meiotic chromosomes. In the absence of Pds5, the meiotic cohesin subunit Rec8 remains bound to chromosomes with only minor defects in sister chromatid cohesion, but sister chromatids synapse instead of homologues. Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are formed but are not repaired efficiently. In addition, meiotic chromosomes undergo hypercondensation. When the mitotic cohesin subunit Mcd1 is substituted for Rec8 in Pds5-depleted cells, chromosomes still hypercondense, but synapsis of sister chromatids is abolished. These data suggest that Pds5 modulates the Rec8 activity to facilitate chromosome morphological changes required for homologue synapsis, DSB repair, and meiotic chromosome segregation.     

Chromosome cohesion: a polymerase for chromosome bridges

How do cells ensure that sister chromatids produced during DNA replication stay connected with each other until their separation in anaphase? New insight is provided by the discovery of DNA polymerase kappa, which has been found to be required for building the connections between sister chromatids.     

The DNA-binding protein CST associates with the cohesin complex and promotes chromosome cohesion

Sister chromatid cohesion (SCC), the pairing of sister chromatids after DNA replication until mitosis, is established by loading of the cohesin complex on newly replicated chromatids. Cohesin must then be maintained until mitosis to prevent segregation defects and aneuploidy. However, how SCC is established and maintained until mitosis remains incompletely understood, and emerging evidence suggests that replication stress may lead to premature SCC loss. Here, we report that the ssDNA-binding protein CTC1-STN1-TEN1 (CST) aids in SCC. CST primarily functions in telomere length regulation but also has known roles in replication restart and DNA repair. After depletion of CST subunits, we observed an increase in the complete loss of SCC. In addition, we determined that CST associates with the cohesin complex. Unexpectedly, we did not find evidence of altered cohesin loading or mitotic progression in the absence of CST; however, we did find that treatment with various replication inhibitors increased the association between CST and cohesin. Because replication stress was recently shown to induce SCC loss, we hypothesized that CST may be required to maintain or remodel SCC after DNA replication fork stalling. In agreement with this idea, SCC loss was greatly increased in CST-depleted cells after exogenous replication stress. Based on our findings, we propose that CST aids in the maintenance of SCC at stalled replication forks to prevent premature cohesion loss.     

Sister chromatid cohesion role for CDC28-CDK in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

High-fidelity chromosome segregation requires that the sister chromatids produced during S phase also become paired during S phase. Ctf7p (Eco1p) is required to establish sister chromatid pairing specifically during DNA replication. However, Ctf7p also becomes active during G(2)/M in response to DNA damage. Ctf7p is a phosphoprotein and an in vitro target of Cdc28p cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK), suggesting one possible mechanism for regulating the essential function of Ctf7p. Here, we report a novel synthetic lethal interaction between ctf7 and cdc28. However, neither elevated CDC28 levels nor CDC28 Cak1p-bypass alleles rescue ctf7 cell phenotypes. Moreover, cells expressing Ctf7p mutated at all full- and partial-consensus CDK-phosphorylation sites exhibit robust cell growth. These and other results reveal that Ctf7p regulation is more complicated than previously envisioned and suggest that CDK acts in sister chromatid cohesion parallel to Ctf7p reactions.     

Sister chromatid exchanges induced by light flashes to 5-bromodeoxyuridine- and 5-iododeoxyuridine substituted Chinese hamster chromosomes

Incorporation of 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) or 5-iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) into the chromosomal DNA of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells during two rounds of replication causes sister chromatids to be differentiated so that they can be discriminated from one another by staining and morphology. Chromatids that contain BUdR or IUdR in both DNA strands stain lighter and are less condensed than their sister chromatids with only unifilar substitution. The halogenated pyrimidine nucleosides also induce sister chromatid exchanges that can be detected without autoradiography. The frequency of these exchanges is markedly increased by exposing the cells to light flashes.     

Selective differential staining of sister chromatids of the facultative heterochromatic X chromosome in the female mouse

Selective differential staining of sister chromatids for the facultative heterochromatic X chromosome in the female mouse has been achieved by the combination of two differential staining techniques; one for the heterochromatic X chromosome and the other for sister chromatids. Thermal hypotonic treatment moderately destroyed the chromosome structure except for the heterochromatic X in BrdU labelled metaphase cells, resulting in the selective sister chromatid differentiation of this X with Giemsa stain. This technique enables us to know the exact frequency of the spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges in the heterochromatic X without using ³H-TdR labelling for detecting the late DNA replication. The results indicate that the sister chromatid exchange frequency of the heterochromatic X chromosome is not affected by its late DNA replication during S phase, or by the genetic inactivation and the resulting heterochromatinization.     

Lack of tension at kinetochores activates the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast

The spindle checkpoint delays the onset of anaphase until all pairs of sister chromatids are attached to the mitotic spindle. The checkpoint could monitor the attachment of microtubules to kinetochores, the tension that results from the two sister chromatids attaching to opposite spindle poles, or both. We tested the role of tension by allowing cells to enter mitosis without a prior round of DNA replication. The unreplicated chromatids are attached to spindle microtubules but are not under tension since they lack a sister chromatid that could attach to the opposite pole. Because the spindle checkpoint is activated in these cells, we conclude that the absence of tension at the yeast kinetochore is sufficient to activate the spindle checkpoint in mitosis.     

Competence for assembly of sister chromatid cores is progressively acquired during S phase in mammalian cells.

Condensed sister chromatids possess a protein scaffold or axial core to which loops of chromatin are attached. The sister cores are believed to be dynamic frameworks that function in the organization and condensation of chromatids. Chromosome structural proteins are implicated in the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion and in the maintenance of epigenetic phenomena. Both processes of templating are tightly linked to DNA replication itself. It is a question whether the structural basis of sister chromatid cores is templated during S phase. As cells proceed through the cell cycle, chromatid cores undergo changes in their protein composition. Cytologically, cores are first visualized at the start of prometaphase. Still, core assembly can be induced in G1 and G2 when interphase cells are fused with mitotic cells. In this study, we asked if chromatid cores are similarly able to assemble in S-phase cells. We find that the ability to assemble cores is transiently lost during local replication, then regained in chromosome regions shortly after they have been replicated. We propose that core templating occurs coincident with DNA replication and that the competence for the assembly of the sister chromatid cores is acquired shortly after passage of replication forks.     

DNA replication-dependent formation of joint DNA molecules in Physarum polycephalum

Two-dimensional neutral/neutral agarose gel electrophoresis is used extensively to localize replication origins. This method resolves DNA structures containing replication forks. It also detects X-shaped recombination intermediates in meiotic cells, in the form of a typical vertical spike. Intriguingly, such a spike of joint DNA molecules is often detectable in replicating DNA from mitotic cells. Here, we used naturally synchronous DNA samples from Physarum polycephalum to demonstrate that postreplicative, DNA replication-dependent X-shaped DNA molecules are formed between sister chromatids. These molecules have physical properties reminiscent of Holliday junctions. Our results demonstrate frequent interactions between sister chromatids during a normal cell cycle and suggest a novel phase during DNA replication consisting of transient, joint DNA molecules formed on newly replicated DNA.     

Quantitative analysis of cohesin complex stoichiometry and SMC3 modification-dependent protein interactions

Cohesin is a protein complex that plays an essential role in pairing replicated sister chromatids during cell division. The vertebrate cohesin complex consists of four core components including structure maintenance of chromosomes proteins SMC1 and SMC3, RAD21, and SA2/SA1. Extensive research suggests that cohesin traps the sister chromatids by a V-shaped SMC1/SMC3 heterodimer bound to the RAD21 protein that closes the ring. Accordingly, the single "ring" model proposes that two sister chromatids are trapped in a single ring that is composed of one molecule each of the 4 subunits. However, evidence also exists for alternative models. The hand-cuff model suggests that each sister chromatid is trapped individually by two rings that are joined through the shared SA1/SA2 subunit. We report here the determination of cohesin subunit stoichiometry of endogenous cohesin complex by quantitative mass spectrometry. Using qConCAT-based isotope labeling, we show that the cohesin core complex contains equimolar of the 4 core components, suggesting that each cohesin ring is closed by one SA1/SA2 molecule. Furthermore, we applied this strategy to quantify post-translational modification-dependent cohesin interactions. We demonstrate that quantitative mass spectrometry is a powerful tool for measuring stoichiometry of endogenous protein core complex.     

Sister chromatid cohesion is required for postreplicative double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks by recombination requires the presence of an undamaged copy that is used as a template during the repair process. Because cells acquire resistance to gamma irradiation during DNA replication and because sister chromatids are the preferred partner for double-strand break repair in mitotic diploid yeast cells, it has long been suspected that cohesion between sister chromatids might be crucial for efficient repair. This hypothesis is consistent with the sensitivity to gamma irradiation of mutants defective in the cohesin complex that holds sister chromatids together from DNA replication until the onset of anaphase (reviewed in) . It is also in accordance with the finding that surveillance mechanisms (checkpoints) that sense DNA damage arrest cell cycle progression in yeast by causing stabilization of the securin Pds1, thereby blocking sister chromatid separation. The hypersensitivity to irradiation of cohesin mutants could, however, be due to a more direct involvement of the cohesin complex in the process of DNA repair. We show here that passage through S phase in the presence of cohesin, and not cohesin per se, is essential for efficient double-strand break repair during G2 in yeast. Proteins needed to load cohesin onto chromosomes (Scc2) and to generate cohesion during S phase (Eco1) are also shown to be required for repair. Our results confirm what has long been suspected but never proven, that cohesion between sister chromatids is essential for efficient double-strand break repair in mitotic cells.     

Pch2 Prevents Mec1/Tel1-Mediated Hop1 Phosphorylation Occurring Independently of Red1 in Budding Yeast Meiosis

A prominent feature of meiosis in most sexually reproducing organisms is interhomolog recombination whereby a significant fraction of the programmed meiotic double-strand breaks are repaired using intact homologous non-sister chromatids rather than sister chromatids. Budding yeast DNA damage checkpoint kinases Mec1 and Tel1 act together with the axial element protein Red1 to promote interhomolog recombination by phosphorylating another axial element protein Hop1. Mec1 and Tel1 also phosphorylate γH2A and the synaptonemal complex protein Zip1 independently of Red1 to facilitate premeiotic DNA replication and to destabilize homology-independent centromere pairing, respectively. It has been unclear why Hop1 phosphorylation is Red1-dependent. Here, we report that the pachytene checkpoint protein 2 (Pch2) specifically prevents Red1-independent Hop1 phosphorylation. Our findings reveal a new function for Pch2 in linking two axial element proteins Red1 and Hop1 thus coordinating their effects in meiotic recombination and the checkpoint network.     

The Rec8 Gene of Schizosaccharomyces Pombe Is Involved in Linear Element Formation, Chromosome Pairing and Sister-Chromatid Cohesion during Meiosis

The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe does not form tripartite synaptonemal complexes during meiotic prophase, but axial core-like structures (linear elements). To probe the relationship between meiotic recombination and the structure, pairing, and segregation of meiotic chromosomes, we genetically and cytologically characterized the rec8-110 mutant, which is partially deficient in meiotic recombination. The pattern of spore viability indicates that chromosome segregation is affected in the mutant. A detailed segregational analysis in the rec8-110 mutant revealed more spores disomic for chromosome III than in a wild-type strain. Aberrant segregations are caused by precocious segregation of sister chromatids at meiosis I, rather than by nondisjunction as a consequence of lack of crossovers. In situ hybridization further showed that the sister chromatids are separated prematurely during meiotic prophase. Moreover, the mutant forms aberrant linear elements and shows a shortened meiotic prophase. Meiotic chromosome pairing in interstitial and centromeric regions is strongly impaired in rec8-110, whereas the chromosome ends are less deficient in pairing. We propose that the rec8 gene encodes a protein required for linear element formation and that the different phenotypes of rec8-110 reflect direct and indirect consequences of the absence of regular linear elements.     

Mitotic inter-homologue junctions accumulate at damaged DNA replication forks in recQ mutants

Mitotic homologous recombination is utilised to repair DNA breaks using either sister chromatids or homologous chromosomes as templates. Because sister chromatids are identical, exchanges between sister chromatids have no consequences for the maintenance of genomic integrity unless they involve repetitive DNA sequences. Conversely, homologous chromosomes might differ in genetic content, and exchanges between homologues might lead to loss of heterozygosity and subsequent inactivation of functional genes. Genomic instability, caused by unscheduled recombination events between homologous chromosomes, is enhanced in the absence of RecQ DNA helicases, as observed in Bloom's cancer-prone syndrome. Here, we used two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to analyse budding yeast diploid cells that were modified to distinguish replication intermediates originating from each homologous chromosome. Therefore, these cells were suitable for analysing the formation of inter-homologue junctions. We found that Rad51-dependent DNA structures resembling inter-homologue junctions accumulate together with sister chromatid junctions at damaged DNA replication forks in recQ mutants, but not in the absence of Srs2 or Mph1 DNA recombination helicases. Inter-homologue joint molecules in recQ mutants are less abundant than sister chromatid junctions, but they accumulate with similar kinetics after origin firing under conditions of DNA damage. We propose that unscheduled accumulation of inter-homologue junctions during DNA replication might account for allelic recombination defects in recQ mutants.     

The spindle is required for the process of sister chromatid separation in Drosophila neuroblasts

We have studied two aspects of the process of sister chromatid separation in the Drosophila melanogaster neuroblasts. First, we analyzed the requirement of a functional spindle for sister chromatid separation to take place using microtubule depolymerizing drugs such as colchicine or a reversible analogue (MTC). Incubation of this tissue in colchicine causes the cells to block irreversibly at metaphase and no significant levels of sister chromatid separation were observed even after long periods of incubation. Exposure of neuroblasts to MTC also causes cells to block at metaphase, but after reversion most of the cells enter anaphase and are thus able to complete sister chromatid separation. These results imply that a functional spindle is required for sister chromatid separation. Second, we studied the role of heterochromatin during chromatid pairing and subsequent separation in chromosomes which carry either one or two extra pieces of heterochromatin. The results indicate that sister chromatids establish strong pairing along the translocated heterochromatin. During the early stages of anaphase, these chromosomes separate first the centromeric region and later the regions bearing extra heterochromatin. These results indicate that constitutive heterochromatin plays an important role for sister chromatid pairing and might be involved in the process of separation.     

PCNA controls establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during S phase

Accurate segregation of the genetic material during cell division requires that sister chromatids are kept together by cohesion proteins until anaphase, when the chromatids become separated and distributed to the two daughter cells. Studies in yeast revealed that chromatid cohesion is essential for viability and is triggered by the conserved protein Eco1 (Ctf7). Cohesion must be established already in S phase in order to tie up sister chromatids instantly after replication, but how this crucial timing is achieved remains enigmatic. Here, we report that in yeast and humans Eco1 is directly physically coupled to the replication protein PCNA, a ring-shaped cofactor of DNA polymerases. Binding to PCNA is crucial, as yeast Eco1 mutants deficient in Eco1-PCNA interaction are defective in cohesion and inviable. Our study thus indicates that PCNA, a central matchmaker for replication-linked functions, is also crucially involved in the establishment of cohesion in S phase.