Control of depolarization-evoked presynaptic neurotransmitter release by Cav2.1 calcium channel: old story, new insights

Depolarization-evoked synaptic transmission relies on the Ca²⁺-regulated release of quantal packets of neurotransmitters following the fusion of synaptic vesicles with the presynaptic plasma membrane. It is well known that neuronal voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels (VGCC), mainly of the Ca_V2.1 and Ca_V2.2 subtypes, play a key role in the first steps of this process, by controlling extracellular Ca²⁺ influx into active zones of the synapse. These channels are in close association with the vesicle machinery and interact with several members of SNARE proteins (soluble NSF (N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein) attachment protein receptor) including syntaxin 1A/1B and SNA P-25 (Q-SNARE s), and synaptotagmin 1 and synaptobrevin 2 (R-SNARE s) (reviewed in ref. ¹). All bind to the synprint (synaptic protein interaction) motif within the intracellular II -III linker of Ca_V2.1 and Ca_V2.2 channels and are responsible for a bidirectional coupling (i) linking the Ca²⁺ influx with the synaptic vesicle release machinery, which is essential for efficient, fast and spatially delimited neurotransmitter release² and (ii) providing regulation of Ca²⁺ channel activity and thus of Ca²⁺ influx.³Key words: calcium channel, Ca_V2.1 channel, P/Q channel, syntaxin, synaptotagmin, SNAP25, exocytosis, synaptic transmissionSeveral studies have proposed that synaptotagmin 1 is the Ca²⁺ sensor for release, linking Ca²⁺ influx to vesicle fusion (reviewed in ref. ⁴). Synaptotagmin 1 has two repeating domains that are rich in negative charges (C2A and C2B), each capable of binding Ca²⁺ ions. It is commonly thought that following Ca²⁺ entry through VGCCs, Ca²⁺ ions bind to C2A and C2B domains, allowing insertion of the Ca²⁺ binding loops of C2A domain in the target bilayer. This then pins the vesicle to the plasma membrane to trigger exocytotic fusion. This view was supported by a point mutation in the C2A domain of synaptotagmin 1 that caused a decrease in Ca²⁺ affinity with a concomitant decrease of neurotransmitter release.⁵ However, despite the fact that synaptotagmin 1 represents the most popular candidate for Ca²⁺ sensor, the initial Ca²⁺ binding event, which occurs during the dynamic process of release is at the EEEE locus within the Ca²⁺ channel itself. This makes the Ca²⁺ channel an excellent candidate for serving as a Ca²⁺ sensor of secretion.⁶Over the past few years, the group of Daphne Atlas has performed extensive studies to differentiate the role of Ca²⁺ binding at the pore of the channel from Ca²⁺ binding to intracellular proteins during evoked-neurotransmitter release. Substituting extracellular Ca²⁺ by lanthanum (La³⁺), a trivalent cation that effectively binds to the EEEE locus of VGCCs but is unable to permeate through the channel, is sufficient to support depolarization-evoked release of catecholamine in PC12 and primary chromaffin cells, as well as insulin release in pancreatic and insulinoma cells. These results led to the suggestion that evoked release may be dependent on ion channel pore occupancy as opposed to cation influx and elevation of intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration.^7–9 This model was further supported by experiments in which depolarization-evoked secretion of catecholamine in chromaffin cells was supported by Ca²⁺ bound at the selectivity filter of a non-conducting Ca_V1.2 channel.¹⁰ These studies are consistent with the proposal that conformational changes subsequent to Ca²⁺ binding at the selectivity filter of the channel are the primary trigger of secretion, whereas synaptotagmin 1 is associated with the channel and acts as a vesicle docking protein (reviewed in ref. ¹¹).In a recent issue of Channels, Cohen-Kutner et al. extended this concept to the neuronal Ca_V2.1 channel.¹² Using the two-electrode voltage-clamp technique on BAPTA-injected Xenopus oocyte expressing the human Ca_V2.1 channel (in combination with β₃ and α₂δ auxiliary subunits), the authors show that overexpression of syntaxin 1A (Stx1A) depresses whole-cell inward barium (Ba²⁺) current in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1, reviewed in ref. ¹²). As previously reported by Bezprozvanny et al.³ this effect is mainly due to a hyperpolarized shift of the steady-state inactivation curve, which decreases the number of available channels at typical resting membrane potentials. A recovery of channel activity is observed following co-expression of botulinium neurotoxin C1 (BoNT/C1) (Fig. 3, reviewed in ref. ¹²). In contrast, expression of the other Q-SNARE protein SNAP-25 drastically increases inward Ba²⁺ current (Fig. 2, reviewed in ref. ¹²). However, when both Q-SNARE proteins are co-expressed, Ca_V2.1 channel recovers wild-type P/Q kinetics and current amplitude (Fig. 2, reviewed in ref. ¹²). Similarly, increases in P/Q currents by expressing the R-SNARE synaptobrevin (VAMP-2) are reversed by the Q-SNARE proteins (Fig. 4, reviewed in ref. ¹²). Taken together these results suggest that: (i) when expressed in BAPTA injected Xenopus oocyte, each of the SNARE proteins is able to modulate the kinetic properties of Ca_V2.1 channel and (ii) when co-expressed, SNARE proteins no longer affect channel activity but rather form a Ca²⁺-independent excitosome complex with a fully functional channel. These data fit nicely with previous work from the Catterall laboratory on P/Q-type channels,¹³ and with previous work on N-type channels.¹⁴To investigate the relevance of Ca_V2.1 channel interaction with SNARE proteins for depolarization-evoked secretion, membrane capacitance changes induced in Xenopus oocytes were monitored in the presence of extracellular Ca²⁺, as previously shown for Ca_V1.2 and Ca_V2.2.¹⁵ While expression of Ca_V2.1 alone in this reconstituted release assay produced only a small change in capacitance, coexpression with the SNARE proteins efficiently induced a BoNT/C- and BoNT/A-sensitive membrane fusion, particularly when all SNARE proteins were co-expressed, i.e., when all members of the excitosome complex are present (Fig. 5, reviewed in ref. ¹²). Hence, increasing the amount of excitosome promotes the capability of Ca_V2.1 channels to produce evoked-secretion, probably by increasing the number of functional excitosome complexes (Fig. 6, reviewed in ref. ¹²).In summary, Cohen-Kutner et al. provide evidence that when expressed in Xenopus oocyte (and possibly in other cellular systems), Ca_V2.1 channels could associate with SNARE proteins at resting intracellular Ca²⁺ concentrations, resulting in tethering the vesicle to the channel and thereby generating docked but non-releasable vesicles. Calcium entry following membrane depolarization would switch the vesicle from the non-releasable to a releasable state by Ca²⁺-binding to Syt1 C2 domains. The fusion of releasable vesicles requires a conformational change of the complex that occurs within the channel itself, during an incoming action potential (Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1A putative model of functional coupling between Ca_V2.1 channel and vesicle release machinery. At resting membrane potential, Ca_V2.1 channel associates with SNARE proteins to form an excitosome complex, in turn generating docked but non-releasable vesicle (A). Calcium entry following membrane depolarization would switch the vesicle from the non-releasable to a releasable state by Ca²⁺-binding to Synaptotagmin 1 C2 domains (B). The fusion of the releasable vesicle requires a conformational change of the excitosome complex that occurs within the channel itself, during an incoming action potential (C).The concept that Ca_V2.1 channels, besides sustaining Ca²⁺ influx, could also work as a molecular on/off-switch of secretion by controlling the ultimate stage of the process (i.e., the conformational change of the releasing complex) is intriguing and is worthy of further investigation. To better dissociate secretion events linked to Ca²⁺ entry through Ca_V2.1 channel from those induced by conformational changes of the channel, it would be necessary to measure secretion in the presence of a non-permeant cation such as La³⁺. Furthermore, one would also need to evaluate mediation of secretion by a non-conducting Ca_V2.1 channel, as already done for L-type channels (Ca_V1.2).^7,9,10 Moreover, the possibility that Ca_V2.1 channels could control secretion via a conformational change of the releasing complex raises questions concerning the preferential channel-gating mode controlling this process. It was recently shown that application of the gating modifier BayK 8644 to non-conducting Ca_V1.2 channels modifies secretion kinetics of catecholamine in chromaffin cells.¹⁶ It is also well known that the auxiliary β-subunit of VGCCs modulates Ca_V2.1 gating modes.¹⁷ Therefore, comparing secretion mediated by a non-conducting Ca_V2.1 channel in the presence of different types of β-subunits would provide important information on the molecular mechanisms through which Ca_V2.1 channels control evoked-secretion, both at the fundamental and physiopathological levels.In conclusion, since the pioneering work by Katz and Miledi in 1967 on the importance of the extracellular Ca²⁺ in the “electro-secretory” process,¹⁸ the identification of the calcium channel as the Ca²⁺ sensor of secretion is one of the most recent and exciting steps that have been made in the understanding of the molecular aspects of the mechanisms involved in the control of depolarization-evoked neurotransmitter release.     

Voltage,reactive oxygen species and the influx of calcium

The apical plasma membrane of young Arabidopsis root hairs has recently been found to contain a depolarisation-activated Ca²⁺ channel, in addition to one activated by hyperpolarisation. The depolarisation-activated Ca²⁺ channel may function in signalling but the possibility that the root hair apical plasma membrane voltage may oscillate between a hyperpolarized and depolarized state suggests a role in growth control. Plant NADPH oxidase activity has yet to be considered in models of oscillatory voltage or ionic flux despite its predicted electrogenicity and voltage dependence. Activity of root NADPH oxidase was found to be stimulated by restricting Ca²⁺ influx, suggesting that these enzymes are involved in sensing Ca²⁺ entry into cells.Key words: calcium, channel, NADPH oxidase, oscillation, root hairElevation of cytosolic free Ca²⁺ ([Ca²⁺]_cyt) encodes plant cell signals.¹ Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are potent regulators of the PM Ca²⁺ channels implicated in signalling and developmental increases in [Ca²⁺]_cyt.^1,2 Plasma membrane (PM) voltage (V_m) also plays a significant part in generating specific [Ca²⁺]_cyt elevations through the opening of voltage-gated Ca²⁺-permeable channels, allowing Ca²⁺ influx.^1,3 Patch clamp electrophysiological studies on the root hair apical PM of Arabidopsis have revealed co-localisation of hyperpolarisation-activated Ca²⁺ channels (HACCs),⁴ ROS-activated HACCs⁵ and depolarisation-activated Ca²⁺ channels (DACCs).⁶ The DACC characterisation pointed to the presence of a Cl⁻-permeable conductance that was activated by moderate hyperpolarisation (−160 mV) but rapidly inactivated when the voltage was maintained at such negative values.⁶ This may be the R-type anion efflux conductance previously described in Arabidopsis root hair and root epidermal PM.⁷ Previous studies have shown that root hair PM also harbors K⁺ channels (mediating inward or outward flux)^8–10 and a H⁺-ATPase.¹¹ A key problem to address now is how these transporters interact to generate and be influenced by PM V_m, thus gating and in turn being regulated by their companion Ca²⁺ channels to encode developmental and environmental signals at the hair apex.A seminal study on the relationship between V_m and ionic fluxes in wheat root protoplasts not only confirmed oscillatory events but also determined that the PM can exist in three distinct states.¹² In the “pump state” the H⁺-ATPase predominates, there is net H⁺ efflux and the hyperpolarized V_m is negative of the equilibrium potential for K⁺ (E_K). In the “K state”, K⁺ permeability predominates but there is still net H⁺ efflux and V_m = E_K. In the third state, there is net H⁺ influx and V_m > E_K. In this depolarized H⁺-influx state, the H⁺-ATPase is thought to be inactive. Oscillations in PM V_m and H⁺ flux may be more profound in growing cells^13,14 and oscillations between these states may explain the temporal changes in H⁺ flux recently observed at the apex of growing Arabidopsis root hairs.¹⁵ Peaks of H⁺ influx may reflect a depolarized V_m that could activate DACC, suggesting that DACC would play a significant role in growth regulation. The view has arisen that the HACC would be the main driver of growth, primarily because in patch clamp assays its current is greater than DACC^4–6 and because resting V_m is usually found to be hyperpolarized. In a growing cell, with a V_m oscillating between a hyperpolarized and depolarized state, a DACC could just as well be a driver of growth given that the Ca²⁺ influx it permits could be amplified through intracellular release.The PM H⁺-ATPase traditionally lies at the core of models of voltage and ionic flux^14,16 but in terms of [Ca²⁺]_cyt regulation, the activity of PM NADPH oxidases must also now be considered. The Arabidopsis root hair apical PM also contains an NADPH oxidase (AtrbohC) that catalyses extracellular superoxide production.⁵ AtrbohC is implicated in the transition to polar growth at normal extracellular pH⁵ and also osmoregulation.¹⁷ NADPH oxidases catalyse the transport of electrons out of the cell and thus, in common with PM redox e⁻ efflux systems,¹⁸ their activity would depolarize the membrane voltage unless countered by cation efflux or anion influx.¹⁹ Two H⁺ would also be released into the cytosol for every NADPH used. The voltage-dependence of plant NADPH oxidases is unknown but e⁻ efflux by animal NADPH oxidases is fairly constant over negative V_m and decreases at very depolarized V_m.²⁰ AtrbohC is implicated in generating oscillatory ROS at the root hair apex and loss of function affects magnitude and duration of apical H⁺ flux oscillations.¹⁵ The latter suggests that AtrbohC function does in some way affect V_m, a situation extending to other root cell types (such as the epidermis) expressing NADPH oxidases.²¹NADPH oxidase activity in roots is under developmental control but also responds to anoxia and nutrient deficiency^22,23 to signal stress conditions. Blockade of PM Ca²⁺ channels by lanthanides increases superoxide production in tobacco suspension cells.²⁴ This suggests that NADPH oxidases are involved in sensing the cell''s Ca²⁺ status and the prediction would be that extracellular Ca²⁺ chelation would increase their activity. To test this, superoxide anion production by excised Arabidopsis roots was measured using reduction of the tetrazolium dye XTT (Sodium, 3′-[1-[phenylamino-carbonyl]-3,4-tetrazolium]-bis(4-methoxy-6-nitro) benzene-sulphonic acid).^25,26 Lowering extracellular Ca²⁺ from 0.5 mM to 1.4 µM by addition of 10 mM EGTA caused a mean 95% increase in diphenyliodinium-sensitive superoxide production (Fig. 1; n = 9), implicating NADPH oxidases as the source of this ROS. Stimulation of NADPH oxidase activity by decreasing Ca²⁺ influx at first appears contradictory as NADPH oxidases are stimulated by increased [Ca²⁺]_cyt²⁷ (Fig. 1). However, reduction of Ca²⁺ influx should promote voltage hyperpolarisation (just as block of K⁺ influx causes hyperpolarisation in root hairs²⁸) and this could feasibly cause increased NADPH oxidase activity. Production of superoxide could then result in ROS-activated HACC activity⁵ to increase Ca²⁺ influx.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Superoxide anion production by Arabidopsis roots. Assay medium comprised 10 mM phosphate buffer with 0.5 mM CaCl₂, 500 µM XTT, pH 6.0. Production was linear over the 30 min incubation period. Control, mean ± standard error, n = 9. Test additions were: 20 µM of the NADPH oxidase inhibitor diphenylene iodonium (DPI; n = 6); 100 µM of the Ca²⁺ ionophore {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"A23187","term_id":"833253","term_text":"A23187"}}A23187,³⁰ to increase [Ca²⁺]_cyt (n = 9); 10 mM of the chelator EGTA (n = 9). Dimethyl sulphoxide [DMSO; 1% (v/v)] was used as a carrier for XTT and DPI and a separate control for this is shown (n = 9).In addition to V_m, activities of PM transporters in vivo will be subject to other levels of regulation such as phosphorylation, nitrosylation and the action of [Ca²⁺]_cyt itself. Distinct spatial separation of transporters will undoubtedly play a significant role in governing V_m and [Ca²⁺]_cyt dynamics, particularly in growing cells. An NADPH oxidase has already been found sequestered in a potential PM microdomain in Medicago.²⁹ While there is still much to do on the “inventory” of PM transporters involved in Ca²⁺ signalling in any given cell, placing them in context not only requires knowledge of their genetic identity but also modelling of their concerted action.     

Protein Misfolding and the Serpinopathies

The serpins are the largest superfamily of protease inhibitors. They are found in almost all branches of life including viruses, prokaryotes and eukaryotes. They inhibit their target protease by a unique mechanism that involves a large conformational transition and the translocation of the enzyme from the upper to the lower pole of the protein. This complex mechanism, and the involvement of serpins in important biological regulatory processes, makes them prone to mutation-related diseases. For example the polymerization of mutant α₁-antitrypsin leads to the accumulation of ordered polymers within the endoplasmic reticulum of hepatocytes in association with cirrhosis. An identical process in the neuron specific serpin, neuroserpin, results in the accumulation of polymers in neurons and the dementia FENIB. In both cases there is a clear correlation between the molecular instability, the rate of polymer formation and the severity of disease. A similar process underlies the hepatic retention and plasma deficiency of antithrombin, C1 inhibitor, α₁-antichymotrypsin and heparin co-factor II. The common mechanism of polymerization has allowed us to group these conditions together as a novel class of disease, the serpinopathies.Key Words: serpins, α1-antitrypsin, neuroserpin, polymerization, dementia, conformational disease, serpinopathiesSerpins (or serine protease inhibitors) are the largest family of protease inhibitors. They have been found in all major branches of life including viruses, prokaryotes and eukaryotes.^1–3 Despite their name there is increasing evidence that serpins can also inhibit other classes of proteases as demonstrated by the viral serpin CrmA and recently by a plant serpin, serpin1.^4,5 They can even play a non-inhibitory role in events as diverse as blood pressure regulation (angiotensinogen), chromatin condensation (MENT), tumor progression (maspin), protein folding (hsp47) and hormone transport (cortisol and thyroxine binding globulin).⁶One of the most important roles of serpins is the regulation of enzymes involved in proteolytic cascades. Among these serpins are α₁-antitrypsin, α₁-antichymotrypsin, C1 inhibitor, antithrombin and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, which play an important role in the control of proteases involved in the inflammatory, complement, coagulation and fibrinolytic pathways, respectively.^1,3 The serpin superfamily is characterised by more than 30% homology with the archetypal serpin α₁-antitrypsin and conservation of tertiary structure.^7,8 Serpins adopt a metastable conformation composed in most cases of 9 α-helices, three β-sheet (A to C) and an exposed mobile reactive centre loop (RCL). This flexible RCL typically contains 20 residues that act as a pseudo substrate for the target protease (Fig. 1A).^9–15 After formation of a Michaelis complex^16,17 the enzyme cleaves the P1-P1′ bond of the serpin, releasing the P1'' residue and forming an ester bond between the protease and the serpin.^18,19 This is then followed by a dramatic conformational transition from a stressed to relaxed conformation with the enzyme being pulled from the upper to the lower pole of the serpin and the insertion of the reactive loop as an extra strand in β-sheet A.^20–25 As a consequence of this conformational change the thermal stability of the serpin is greatly enhanced. Whereas a typical serpin in its native state exhibits a midpoint of thermal denaturation of around 50–60°C, a cleaved serpin with its RCL fully incorporated into β-sheet A denatures at temperatures >120°C.^9,26,27 Another consequence is the inactivation of the enzyme, stabilised at the acyl-intermediate and unable to proceed further to deacylation of the complex.^24,28 This serpin-protease complex then binds to members of the lipoprotein receptor family and is cleared from the circulation.^29–31Open in a separate windowFigure 1Inhibition of neutrophil elastase by α₁-antitrypsin and the structural basis of polymerization. (A) After docking (left) the neutrophil elastase (grey) is inactivated by movement from the upper to the lower pole of the protein (right). This is associated with the insertion of the RCL (red) as an extra strand into β-sheet A (green). (B) The structure of α₁-antitrypsin is centred on β-sheet A (green) and the mobile reactive centre loop (red). Polymer formation results from the Z variant of α₁-antitrypsin (Glu342Lys at P17; indicated by arrow) or mutations in the shutter domain (blue circle) that open β-sheet A to favour partial loop insertion and the formation of an unstable intermediate (M*). The patent β-sheet A then accepts the loop of another molecule to form a dimer (D), which then extends into polymers (P). The individual molecules of α₁-antitrypsin within the polymer, although identical, are coloured red, yellow and blue for clarity. Figure reproduced with permission from Lomas et al.⁹⁷Despite the evolutionary advantage conferred upon serpins by the remarkable mobility of the native state, their complexity is also their weak point.^19,32 Mutations affecting the serpins can lead to a variety of diseases, resulting from either a gain or loss of function.^6,19 For example mutations can cause aberrant conformational transitions that result in the retention of the serpin within the cell of synthesis. This will lead to either protein overload and death of the cell in which the serpin is synthesised, or disease as a consequence of the resulting plasma deficiency. Such a mechanism underlies diseases as diverse as cirrhosis, thrombosis, angio-oedema, emphysema and dementia. We review here the common mechanism underlying these diseases that we have grouped together as the serpinopathies.^33–35 The aggregation and accumulation of conformationally destabilized proteins is an important feature of many neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s disease and the spongiform encephalopathies. Indeed we have used the serpinopathies as a paradigm for these other ‘conformational diseases’.³⁶     

Roles of calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinases in innate immunity in rice

Cytosolic free Ca²⁺ mobilization induced by microbe/pathogen-asssociated molecular patterns (MAMPs/PAMPs) plays key roles in plant innate immunity. However, components involved in Ca²⁺ signaling pathways still remain to be identified and possible involvement of the CBL (calcineurin B-like proteins)-CIPK (CBL-interacting protein kinases) system in biotic defense signaling have yet to be clarified. Recently we identified two CIPKs, OsCIPK14 and OsCIPK15, which are rapidly induced by MAMPs, involved in various MAMP-induced immune responses including defense-related gene expression, phytoalexin biosynthesis and hypersensitive cell death. MAMP-induced production of reactive oxygen species as well as cell browning were also suppressed in OsCIPK14/15-RNAi transgenic cell lines. Possible molecular mechanisms and physiological functions of the CIPKs in plant innate immunity are discussed.Key words: PAMPs/MAMPs, calcium signaling, CBL-CIPK, hypersensitive cell death, reactive oxygen speciesCa²⁺ plays an essential role as an intracellular second messenger in plants as well as in animals. Several families of Ca²⁺ sensor proteins have been identified in higher plants, which decode spatiotemporal patterns of intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration.^1,2 Calcineurin B-Like Proteins (CBLs) comprise a family of Ca²⁺ sensor proteins similar to both the regulatory β-subunit of calcineurin and neuronal Ca²⁺ sensors of animals.^3,4 Unlike calcineurin B that regulates protein phosphatases, CBLs specifically target a family of protein kinases referred to as CIPKs (CBL-Interacting Protein Kinases).⁵ The CBL-CIPK system has been shown to be involved in a wide range of signaling pathways, including abiotic stress responses such as drought and salt, plant hormone responses and K+ channel regulation.^6,7Following the recognition of pathogenic signals, plant cells initiate the activation of a widespread signal transduction network that trigger inducible defense responses, including the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), biosynthesis of phytoalexins, expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes and reorganization of cytoskeletons and the vacuole,⁸ followed by a form of programmed cell death known as hypersensitive response (HR).^9,10 Because complexed spatiotemporal patterns of cytosolic free Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca²⁺]_cyt) have been suggested to play pivotal roles in defense signaling,^1,9 multiple Ca²⁺ sensor proteins and their effectors should function in defense signaling pathways. Although possible involvement of some calmodulin isoforms^11–13 and the calmodulin-domain/calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs)^14–19 has been suggested, other Ca²⁺-regulated signaling components still remain to be identified. No CBLs or CIPKs had so far been implicated as signaling components in innate immunity.     

The TRPA1 channel and oral hypoglycemic agents

Diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) results from the combination of insulin unresponsiveness in target tissues and the failure of pancreatic β cells to secrete enough insulin.¹ It is a highly prevalent chronic disease that is aggravated with time, leading to major complications, such as cardiovascular disease and peripheral and ocular neuropathies.² Interestingly, therapies to improve glucose homeostasis in diabetic patients usually involve the use of glibenclamide, an oral hypoglycemic drug that blocks ATP-sensitive K⁺ channels (K_ATP),^3,4 forcing β cells to release more insulin to overcome peripheral insulin resistance. However, sulfonylureas are ineffective for long-term treatments and ultimately result in the administration of insulin to control glucose levels.⁵ The mechanisms underlying β-cell failure to respond effectively with glibenclamide after long-term treatments still needs clarification. A recent study demonstrating that this drug activates TRPA1,⁶ a member of the Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) family of ion channels and a functional protein in insulin secreting cells,^7,8 has highlighted a possible role for TRPA1 as a potential mediator of sulfonylurea-induced toxicity.     

Determinants in CaV1 Channels That Regulate the Ca2+ Sensitivity of Bound Calmodulin

Calmodulin binds to IQ motifs in the α₁ subunit of Ca_V1.1 and Ca_V1.2, but the affinities of calmodulin for the motif and for Ca²⁺ are higher when bound to Ca_V1.2 IQ. The Ca_V1.1 IQ and Ca_V1.2 IQ sequences differ by four amino acids. We determined the structure of calmodulin bound to Ca_V1.1 IQ and compared it with that of calmodulin bound to Ca_V1.2 IQ. Four methionines in Ca²⁺-calmodulin form a hydrophobic binding pocket for the peptide, but only one of the four nonconserved amino acids (His-1532 of Ca_V1.1 and Tyr-1675 of Ca_V1.2) contacts this calmodulin pocket. However, Tyr-1675 in Ca_V1.2 contributes only modestly to the higher affinity of this peptide for calmodulin; the other three amino acids in Ca_V1.2 contribute significantly to the difference in the Ca²⁺ affinity of the bound calmodulin despite having no direct contact with calmodulin. Those residues appear to allow an interaction with calmodulin with one lobe Ca²⁺-bound and one lobe Ca²⁺-free. Our data also provide evidence for lobe-lobe interactions in calmodulin bound to Ca_V1.2.The complexity of eukaryotic Ca²⁺ signaling arises from the ability of cells to respond differently to Ca²⁺ signals that vary in amplitude, duration, and location. A variety of mechanisms decode these signals to drive the appropriate physiological responses. The Ca²⁺ sensor for many of these physiological responses is the Ca²⁺-binding protein calmodulin (CaM).² The primary sequence of CaM is tightly conserved in all eukaryotes, yet it binds and regulates a broad set of target proteins in response to Ca²⁺ binding. CaM has two domains that bind Ca²⁺ as follows: an amino-terminal domain (N-lobe) and a carboxyl-terminal domain (C-lobe) joined via a flexible α-helix. Each lobe of CaM binds two Ca²⁺ ions, and binding within each lobe is highly cooperative. The two lobes of CaM, however, have distinct Ca²⁺ binding properties; the C-lobe has higher Ca²⁺ affinity because of a slower rate of dissociation, whereas the N-lobe has weaker Ca²⁺ affinity and faster kinetics (1). CaM can also bind to some target proteins in both the presence and absence of Ca²⁺, and the preassociation of CaM in low Ca²⁺ modulates the apparent Ca²⁺ affinity of both the amino-terminal and carboxyl-terminal lobes. Differences in the Ca²⁺ binding properties of the lobes and in the interaction sites of the amino- and carboxyl-terminal lobes enable CaM to decode local versus global Ca²⁺ signals (2).Even though CaM is highly conserved, CaM target (or recognition) sites are quite heterogeneous. The ability of CaM to bind to very different targets is at least partially due to its flexibility, which allows it to assume different conformations when bound to different targets. CaM also binds to various targets in distinct Ca²⁺ saturation states as follows: Ca²⁺-free (3), Ca²⁺ bound to only one of the two lobes, or fully Ca²⁺-bound (4–7). In addition, CaM may bind with both lobes bound to a target (5, 6) or with only a single lobe engaged (8). If a target site can bind multiple conformers of CaM, CaM may undergo several transitions that depend on Ca²⁺ concentration, thereby tuning the functional response. Identification of stable intermediate states of CaM bound to individual targets will help to elucidate the steps involved in this fine-tuned control.Both Ca_V1.1 and Ca_V1.2 belong to the L-type family of voltage-dependent Ca²⁺ channels, which bind apoCaM and Ca²⁺-CaM at carboxyl-terminal recognition sites in their α₁ subunits (9–14). Ca²⁺ binding to CaM, bound to Ca_V1.2 produces Ca²⁺-dependent facilitation (CDF) (14). Whether Ca_V1.1 undergoes CDF is not known. However, both Ca_V1.2 and Ca_V1.1 undergo Ca²⁺- and CaM-dependent inactivation (CDI) (14, 15). Ca_V1.1 CDI is slower and more sensitive to buffering by 1,2-bis(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid than Ca_V1.2 CDI (15). Ca²⁺ buffers are thought to influence CDI and/or CDF in voltage-dependent Ca²⁺ channels by competing with CaM for Ca²⁺ (16).The conformation of the carboxyl terminus of the α₁ subunit is critical for channel function and has been proposed to regulate the gating machinery of the channel (17, 18). Several interactions of this region include intramolecular contacts with the pore inactivation machinery and intermolecular contacts with CaM kinase II and ryanodine receptors (17, 19–22). Ca²⁺ regulation of Ca_V1.2 may involve several motifs within this highly conserved region, including an EF hand motif and three contiguous CaM-binding sequences (10, 12). ApoCaM and Ca²⁺-CaM-binding sites appear to overlap at the site designated as the “IQ motif” (9, 12, 13), which are critical for channel function at the molecular and cellular level (14, 23).Differences in the rate at which 1,2-bis(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid affects CDI of Ca_V1.1 and Ca_V1.2 could reflect differences in their interactions with CaM. In this study we describe the differences in CaM interactions with the IQ motifs of the Ca_V1.1 and the Ca_V1.2 channels in terms of crystal structure, CaM affinity, and Ca²⁺ binding to CaM. We find the structures of Ca²⁺-CaM-IQ complexes are similar except for a single amino acid change in the peptide that contributes to its affinity for CaM. We also find that the other three amino acids that differ in Ca_V1.2 and Ca_V1.1 contribute to the ability of Ca_V1.2 to bind a partially Ca²⁺-saturated form of CaM.     

Functional Ryanodine Receptors in the Plasma Membrane of RINm5F Pancreatic ��-Cells

Ryanodine receptors (RyR) are Ca²⁺ channels that mediate Ca²⁺ release from intracellular stores in response to diverse intracellular signals. In RINm5F insulinoma cells, caffeine, and 4-chloro-m-cresol (4CmC), agonists of RyR, stimulated Ca²⁺ entry that was independent of store-operated Ca²⁺ entry, and blocked by prior incubation with a concentration of ryanodine that inactivates RyR. Patch-clamp recording identified small numbers of large-conductance (γ_K = 169 pS) cation channels that were activated by caffeine, 4CmC or low concentrations of ryanodine. Similar channels were detected in rat pancreatic β-cells. In RINm5F cells, the channels were blocked by cytosolic, but not extracellular, ruthenium red. Subcellular fractionation showed that type 3 IP₃ receptors (IP₃R3) were expressed predominantly in endoplasmic reticulum, whereas RyR2 were present also in plasma membrane fractions. Using RNAi selectively to reduce expression of RyR1, RyR2, or IP₃R3, we showed that RyR2 mediates both the Ca²⁺ entry and the plasma membrane currents evoked by agonists of RyR. We conclude that small numbers of RyR2 are selectively expressed in the plasma membrane of RINm5F pancreatic β-cells, where they mediate Ca²⁺ entry.Ryanodine receptors (RyR)³ and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP₃R) (1, 2) are the archetypal intracellular Ca²⁺ channels. Both are widely expressed, although RyR are more restricted in their expression than IP₃R (3, 4). In common with many cells, pancreatic β-cells and insulin-secreting cell lines express both IP₃R (predominantly IP₃R3) (5, 6) and RyR (predominantly RyR2) (7). Both RyR and IP₃R are expressed mostly within membranes of the endoplasmic (ER), where they mediate release of Ca²⁺. Functional RyR are also expressed in the secretory vesicles (8, 9) or, and perhaps more likely, in the endosomes of β-cells (10). Despite earlier suggestions (11), IP₃R are probably not present in the secretory vesicles of β-cells (8, 12, 13).All three subtypes of IP₃R are stimulated by IP₃ with Ca²⁺ (1), and the three subtypes of RyR are each directly regulated by Ca²⁺. However, RyR differ in whether their most important physiological stimulus is depolarization of the plasma membrane (RyR1), Ca²⁺ (RyR2) or additional intracellular messengers like cyclic ADP-ribose. The latter stimulates both Ca²⁺ release and insulin secretion in β-cells (8, 14). The activities of both families of intracellular Ca²⁺ channels are also modulated by many additional signals that act directly or via phosphorylation (15, 16). Although they commonly mediate release of Ca²⁺ from the ER, both IP₃R and RyR select rather poorly between Ca²⁺ and other cations (permeability ratio, P_Ca/P_K ∼7) (1, 17). This may allow electrogenic Ca²⁺ release from the ER to be rapidly compensated by uptake of K⁺ (18), and where RyR or IP₃R are expressed in other membranes it may allow them to affect membrane potential.Both Ca²⁺ entry and release of Ca²⁺ from intracellular stores contribute to the oscillatory increases in cytosolic Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca²⁺]_i) that stimulate exocytosis of insulin-containing vesicles in pancreatic β-cells (7). Glucose rapidly equilibrates across the plasma membrane (PM) of β-cells and its oxidative metabolism by mitochondria increases the cytosolic ATP/ADP ratio, causing K_ATP channels to close (19). This allows an unidentified leak current to depolarize the PM (20) and activate voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels, predominantly L-type Ca²⁺ channels (21). The resulting Ca²⁺ entry is amplified by Ca²⁺-induced Ca²⁺ release from intracellular stores (7), triggering exocytotic release of insulin-containing dense-core vesicles (22). The importance of this sequence is clear from the widespread use of sulfonylurea drugs, which close K_ATP channels, in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Ca²⁺ uptake by mitochondria beneath the PM further stimulates ATP production, amplifying the initial response to glucose and perhaps thereby contributing to the sustained phase of insulin release (23). However, neither the increase in [Ca²⁺]_i nor the insulin release evoked by glucose or other nutrients is entirely dependent on Ca²⁺ entry (7, 24) or closure of K_ATP channels (25). This suggests that glucose metabolism may also more directly activate RyR (7, 26) and/or IP₃R (27) to cause release of Ca²⁺ from intracellular stores. A change in the ATP/ADP ratio is one means whereby nutrient metabolism may be linked to opening of intracellular Ca²⁺ channels because both RyR (28) and IP₃R (1) are stimulated by ATP.The other major physiological regulators of insulin release are the incretins: glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic hormone (29). These hormones, released by cells in the small intestine, stimulate synthesis of cAMP in β-cells and thereby potentiate glucose-evoked insulin release (30). These pathways are also targets of drugs used successfully to treat type 2 diabetes (29). The responses of β-cells to cAMP involve both cAMP-dependent protein kinase and epacs (exchange factors activated by cAMP) (31, 32). The effects of the latter are, at least partly, due to release of Ca²⁺ from intracellular stores via RyR (33–35) and perhaps also via IP₃R (36). The interplays between Ca²⁺ and cAMP signaling generate oscillatory changes in the concentrations of both messengers (37). RyR and IP₃R are thus implicated in mediating responses to each of the major physiological regulators of insulin secretion: glucose and incretins.Here we report that in addition to expression in intracellular stores, which probably include both the ER and secretory vesicles and/or endosomes, functional RyR2 are also expressed in small numbers in the PM of RINm5F insulinoma cells and rat pancreatic β-cells.     

Prions: En route from structural models to structures

The prion hypothesis^1–3 states that the prion and non-prion form of a protein differ only in their 3D conformation and that different strains of a prion differ by their 3D structure.^4,5 Recent technical developments have enabled solid-state NMR to address the atomic-resolution structures of full-length prions, and a first comparative study of two of them, HET-s and Ure2p, in fibrillar form, has recently appeared as a pair of companion papers.^6,7 Interestingly, the two structures are rather different: HET-s features an exceedingly well-ordered prion domain and a partially disordered globular domain. Ure2p in contrast features a very well ordered globular domain with a conserved fold, and—most probably—a partially ordered prion domain.⁶ For HET-s, the structure of the prion domain is characterized at atomic-resolution. For Ure2p, structure determination is under way, but the highly resolved spectra clearly show that information at atomic resolution should be achievable.Key words: prion, NMR, solid-state NMR, MAS, structure, Ure2p, HET-sDespite the large interest in the basic mechanisms of fibril formation and prion propagation, little is known about the molecular structure of prions at atomic resolution and the mechanism of propagation. Prions with related properties to the ones responsible for mammalian diseases were also discovered in yeast and funghi^8,9 which provide convenient model system for their studies. Prion proteins described include the mammalian prion protein PrP, Ure2p,¹⁰ Rnq1p,¹¹ Sup35,¹² Swi1,¹³ and Cyc8,¹⁴ from bakers yeast (S. cervisiae) and HET-s from the filamentous fungus P. anserina. The soluble non-prion form of the proteins characterized in vitro is a globular protein with an unfolded, dynamically disordered N- or C-terminal tail.^15–18 In the prion form, the proteins form fibrillar aggregates, in which the tail adopts a different conformation and is thought to be the dominant structural element for fibril formation.Fibrills are difficult to structurally characterize at atomic resolution, as X-ray diffraction and liquid-state NMR cannot be applied because of the non-crystallinity and the mass of the fibrils. Solid-state NMR, in contrast, is nowadays well suited for this purpose. The size of the monomer, between 230 and 685 amino-acid residues for the prions of Figure 1, and therefore the number of resonances in the spectrum—that used to be large for structure determination—is now becoming tractable by this method.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Prions identified today and characterized as consisting of a prion domain (blue) and a globular domain (red).Prion proteins characterized so far were found to be usually constituted of two domains, namely the prion domain and the globular domain (see Fig. 1). This architecture suggests a divide-and-conquer approach to structure determination, in which the globular and prion domain are investigated separately. In isolation, the latter, or fragments thereof, were found to form β-sheet rich structures (e.g., Ure2p(1-89),^6,19 Rnq1p(153-405)²⁰ and HET-s(218-289)²¹). The same conclusion was reached by investigating Sup35(1-254).²² All these fragements have been characterized as amyloids, which we define in the sense that a significant part of the protein is involved in a cross-beta motif.²³ An atomic resolution structure however is available presently only for the HET-s prion domain, and was obtained from solid-state NMR²⁴ (vide infra). It contains mainly β-sheets, which form a triangular hydrophobic core. While this cross-beta structure can be classified as an amyloid, its triangular shape does deviate significantly from amyloid-like structures of smaller peptides.²³Regarding the globular domains, structures have been determined by x-ray crystallography (Ure2p^25,26 and HET-s²⁷), as well as NMR (mammal prions^15,28–30). All reveal a protein fold rich in α-helices, and dimeric structures for the Ure2 and HET-s proteins. The Ure2p fold resembles that of the β-class glutathione S-transferases (GST), but lacks GST activity.²⁵It is a central question for the structural biology of prions if the divide-and-conquer approach imposed by limitations in current structural approaches is valid. Or in other words: can the assembly of full-length prions simply be derived from the sum of the two folds observed for the isolated domains?     

Cell Migration from Baby to Mother

Fetal cells migrate into the mother during pregnancy. Fetomaternal transfer probably occurs in all pregnancies and in humans the fetal cells can persist for decades. Microchimeric fetal cells are found in various maternal tissues and organs including blood, bone marrow, skin and liver. In mice, fetal cells have also been found in the brain. The fetal cells also appear to target sites of injury. Fetomaternal microchimerism may have important implications for the immune status of women, influencing autoimmunity and tolerance to transplants. Further understanding of the ability of fetal cells to cross both the placental and blood-brain barriers, to migrate into diverse tissues, and to differentiate into multiple cell types may also advance strategies for intravenous transplantation of stem cells for cytotherapeutic repair. Here we discuss hypotheses for how fetal cells cross the placental and blood-brain barriers and the persistence and distribution of fetal cells in the mother.Key Words: fetomaternal microchimerism, stem cells, progenitor cells, placental barrier, blood-brain barrier, adhesion, migrationMicrochimerism is the presence of a small population of genetically distinct and separately derived cells within an individual. This commonly occurs following transfusion or transplantation.^1–3 Microchimerism can also occur between mother and fetus. Small numbers of cells traffic across the placenta during pregnancy. This exchange occurs both from the fetus to the mother (fetomaternal)^4–7 and from the mother to the fetus.^8–10 Similar exchange may also occur between monochorionic twins in utero.^11–13 There is increasing evidence that fetomaternal microchimerism persists lifelong in many child-bearing women.^7,14 The significance of fetomaternal microchimerism remains unclear. It could be that fetomaternal microchimerism is an epiphenomenon of pregnancy. Alternatively, it could be a mechanism by which the fetus ensures maternal fitness in order to enhance its own chances of survival. In either case, the occurrence of pregnancy-acquired microchimerism in women may have implications for graft survival and autoimmunity. More detailed understanding of the biology of microchimeric fetal cells may also advance progress towards cytotherapeutic repair via intravenous transplantation of stem or progenitor cells.Trophoblasts were the first zygote-derived cell type found to cross into the mother. In 1893, Schmorl reported the appearance of trophoblasts in the maternal pulmonary vasculature.¹⁵ Later, trophoblasts were also observed in the maternal circulation.^16–20 Subsequently various other fetal cell types derived from fetal blood were also found in the maternal circulation.^21,22 These fetal cell types included lymphocytes,²³ erythroblasts or nucleated red blood cells,^24,25 haematopoietic progenitors^7,26,27 and putative mesenchymal progenitors.^14,28 While it has been suggested that small numbers of fetal cells traffic across the placenta in every human pregnancy,^29–31 trophoblast release does not appear to occur in all pregnancies.³² Likewise, in mice, fetal cells have also been reported in maternal blood.^33,34 In the mouse, fetomaternal transfer also appears to occur during all pregnancies.³⁵     

RALFs: Peptide regulators of plant growth

Peptide signaling regulates a variety of developmental processes and environmental responses in plants.^1–6 For example, the peptide systemin induces the systemic defense response in tomato⁷ and defensins are small cysteine-rich proteins that are involved in the innate immune system of plants.^8,9 The CLAVATA3 peptide regulates meristem size¹⁰ and the SCR peptide is the pollen self-incompatibility recognition factor in the Brassicaceae.^11,12 LURE peptides produced by synergid cells attract pollen tubes to the embryo sac.⁹ RALFs are a recently discovered family of plant peptides that play a role in plant cell growth.Key words: peptide, growth factor, alkalinization     

Is,indeed, the prion protein a Harlequin servant of “many” masters?

Tens of putative interacting partners of the cellular prion protein (PrP^C) have been identified, yet the physiologic role of PrP^C remains unclear. For the first time, however, a recent paper has demonstrated that the absence of PrP^C produces a lethal phenotype. Starting from this evidence, here we discuss the validity of past and more recent literature supporting that, as part of protein platforms at the cell surface, PrP^C may bridge extracellular matrix molecules and/or membrane proteins to intracellular signaling pathways.Key words: prion protein, PrP^C, extracellular matrix, cell adhesion molecules, neuritogenesis, p59fyn, Ca²⁺Initially, the discovery that the prion protein was the major, if not the unique, component of the prion agent causing transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE)¹ has placed the protein in an extremely unfavorable light. Thereafter, however, a wealth of evidence has supported the notion that the protein positively influences several aspects of the cell physiology, and that its duality—in harboring both lethal and beneficial potentials—could be rationalized in terms of a structural switch. Indeed, the protein exists in at least two conformational states: the cellular, α helix-rich isoform, PrP^C, and the prion-associated β sheet-rich isoform, PrP^Sc.² If it is now unquestionable that the presence of PrP^C in the cell is mandatory for prion replication and neurotoxicity to occur,^3,4 nonetheless its physiologic function is still debatable, despite the long lasting effort, and the numerous, frequently genetically advanced, animal and cell model systems dedicated to the issue. From these studies the picture of an extremely versatile protein has emerged, whereby PrP^C acts in the cell defense against oxidative and apoptotic challenges, but also in cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation, and in synaptic plasticity.^5,6 In an effort to converge these multiple propositions in an unifying functional model, different murine lines devoid of PrP^C have been studied. These animals, however, displayed no obvious phenotype,^7–9 suggesting that either PrP^C is dispensable during development and adult life or that compensative mechanisms mask the loss of PrP^C function in these paradigms. Thus, identifying the exact role of PrP^C in the cell would not only resolve an important biological question, but would also help elucidate the cellular steps of prion pathogenesis necessary for designing early diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies for TSE.As is often the case, the employment of a model system unprecedented in prion research has recently disclosed a most interesting scenario with regards to PrP^C physiology, having unravelled, for the first time, a lethal phenotype linked to the absence of the protein.¹⁰ The paradigm is the zebrafish, which expresses two PrP^C isoforms (PrP1 and PrP2). Similarly to mammalian PrP^C, they are glycosylated and attached to the external side of the plasma membrane through a glycolipid anchor. PrP1 and PrP2 are, however, expressed in distinct time frames of the zebrafish embryogenesis. Accordingly, the knockdown of the PrP1, or PrP2, gene very early in embryogenesis impaired development at different stages, bypassing putative compensatory mechanisms. By focusing on PrP1, Malaga-Trillo et al. showed that the protein was essential for cell adhesion, and that this event occurred through PrP1 homophilic trans-interactions and signaling. This comprised activation of the Src-related tyrosine (Tyr) kinase p59fyn, and, possibly, Ca²⁺ metabolism, leading to the regulation of the trafficking of E-cadherin, a member of surface-expressed cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) responsible for cell growth and differentiation.¹¹ It was also reported that overlapping PrP1 functions were performed by PrP^Cs from other species, while the murine PrP^C was capable to replace PrP1 in rescuing, at least in part, the knockdown developmental phenotype. Apart from providing the long-sought proof for a vital role of PrP^C, the demonstration that a mammalian isoform corrected the lethal zebrafish phenotype strongly reinforces previous results—mainly obtained in a variety of mammalian primary neurons and cell lines—pointing to a functional interplay of PrP^C with CAMs, or extra cellular matrix (ECM) proteins, and cell signaling, to promote neuritogenesis and neuronal survival. A revisit of these data is the main topic of the present minireview.As mentioned, the capacity of PrP^C to act as a cell adhesion, or recognition, molecule, and to entertain interactions with proteins implicated in growth and survival, has already been reported for the mammalian PrP^C. A case in point is the interaction, both in cis- and trans-configurations, with the neuronal adhesion protein N-CAM12 that led to neurite outgrowth.¹³ Like cadherins, N-CAM belongs to the CAM superfamily. Following homo- or heterophylic interactions, it can not only mediate adhesion of cells, or link ECM proteins to the cytoskeleton, but also act as a receptor to transduce signals ultimately resulting in modulating neurite outgrowth, neuronal survival and synaptic plasticity.¹¹ Another example is the binding of PrPC to laminin, an ECM heterotrimeric glycoprotein, which induced neuritogenesis together with neurite adhesion and maintenance,^14,15 but also learning and memory consolidation.¹⁶ Further, it has been described that PrPC interacted with the mature 67 kDa-receptor (67LR) (and its 37 kDa-precursor) for laminin, and with glycosamminoglycans (GAGs), each of which is involved in neuronal differentiation and axon growth.^17–21 More recently, Hajj et al.²² have reported that the direct interaction of PrP^C with another ECM protein, vitronectin, could accomplish the same process, and that the absence of PrP^C could be functionally compensated by the overexpression of integrin, another laminin receptor.²³ Incidentally, the latter finding may provide a plausible explanation for the absence of clear phenotypes in mammalian PrP-null paradigms. By exposing primary cultured neurons to recombinant PrPs, others have shown that trans-interactions of PrP^C are equally important for neuronal outgrowth,^24,25 including the formation of synaptic contacts.²⁵ Finally, it has been demonstrated that the binding of PrP^C with the secreted co-chaperone stress-inducible protein 1 (STI1) stimulated neuritogenesis.²⁶ This same interaction had also a pro-survival effect, as did the interaction of PrP^C with its recombinant form.²⁴ Notably, the involvement of PrP^C in cell protection has been heightened by experiments with whole animals. By applying transient or permanent focal cerebral ischemia to the animals, it was found that their reduced brain damage correlated with spontaneous or adenoviral-mediated, upregulation of PrP^C,^27–29 (reviewed in ref. ³⁰), and that PrP^C deficiency aggravated their ischemic brain injury.^30,31 Thus, now that data are available from phylogenetically distant paradigms (zebrafish and mammalian model systems), it acquires more solid grounds the advocated engagement of PrP^C in homo/heterophilic cis/trans interactions to trigger signaling events aiming at neuronal—or, in more general terms, cell—survival and neuritogenesis. The latter notion is consistent with the delayed maturation of different types of PrP^C-less neurons, observed both in vitro and in vivo.^32,33If one assumes that the interaction of PrP^C with multiple partners (45 for PrP^C and PrP^Sc, as reviewed in Aguzzi et al.,⁵ or 46 considering the homophylic interaction) are all functionally significant, the most immediate interpretation of this “sticky” behavior entails that PrP^C acts as a scaffolding protein in different membrane protein complexes.^5,6 Each complex could then activate a specific signaling pathway depending on the type and maturation of cells, the expression and glycosylation of PrP^C, and availability of extra- and intra-cellular signaling partners. At large, all these signals have been shown to be advantageous to the cell. However, because in a cell only a subtle line divides the “good” from the “bad,” instances can be envisioned in which a pro-life signal turns into a pro-death signal. A typical example of this possibility is glutamate excitotoxicity resulting in dangerous, glutamate receptor-linked, Ca²⁺ overload. Likewise, an excessive or over-stimulated signal elicited by PrP^C, or by the putative complex housing the protein could become noxious to the cell. This possibility may explain why the massive expression of PrP^C caused degeneration of the nervous system,³⁴ and of skeletal muscles,^34,35 in transgenic animals. More intriguing is the finding that—in a mouse line expressing anchorless PrP^C—PrP^Sc was capable to replicate without threatening the integrity of neurons.³⁶ This may suggest that native membrane-bound PrP^C acts as, or takes part into, a “receptor for PrP^Sc”, and that lasting PrP^Sc-PrP^C interactions distort the otherwise beneficial signal of the protein/complex and cause neurodegeneration.³⁷ Consistent with this hypothesis is the finding that the in vivo antibody-mediated ligation of PrP^C provoked apoptosis of the antibody-injected brain area.³⁸ Speculatively, the action of N-terminally, or N-proximally truncated PrPs whose expression in PrP-less transgenic mice induced extensive neurodegeneration,^39–41 may be traced back to the same hyper-activation of PrP^C signaling. Possibly, this may hold true also for the synaptic impairment that, recorded only in PrP^C-expressing neurons, was attributed to the binding of amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide oligomers implicated in Alzheimer disease, to PrP^C.^42,43But which is (are) the cellular signaling pathway(s) conveyed by the engagement of PrP^C in different signaling complexes? In line with its multifaceted behavior, several intracellular effectors have been proposed, including p59fyn, mitogen-activated kinases (MAPK) Erk1/2, PI3K/Akt and cAMP-PKA. p59fyn is the most reported downstream effector, suggesting that, in accordance with its behavior, p59fyn could serve as the sorting point for multiple incoming and outgoing signals also in the case of PrP^C. The initial evidence of the PrP^C-p59fyn connection came from cells subjected to antibody-mediated cross-linking of PrP^C.⁴⁴ Later, it was shown that the PrP^C-p59fyn signal converged to Erk1/2 through a pathway dependent on (but also independent of) reactive oxygen species generated by NADPH oxidase.⁴⁵ A PrP^C-dependent activation of p59fyn^13,25 and Erk1/2 (but also of PI3K and cAMP-PKA)²⁴ was evident in other neuronal cell paradigms and consistent with the almost ubiquitous expression of PrP^C, in non-neuronal cells such as Jurkat and T cells.⁴⁶ Not to forget that in zebrafish embryonic cells activated p59fyn was found in the same focal adhesion sites harboring PrP1.¹⁰ Regarding the activation of the ERK1/2 pathway promoted by the PrP^C-STI1 complex, and leading to neuritogenesis, the role of p59fyn was not investigated.²⁶ The same holds true for the transduction of a neuroprotective signal by the PrP^C-STI1 complex involving the cAMP-PKA pathway.²⁶ Interestingly, this is not the only example reporting that engagement of PrP^C activates simultaneously two independent pathways. In fact, possibly after transactivating the receptor for the epidermal growth factor, the antibody-mediated clustering of PrP^C was shown to impinge on both the Erk1/2 pathway, and on a protein (stathmin) involved in controlling microtubule dynamics.⁴⁷Yet, if p59fyn is implicated in mammalian PrP^C-activated signaling cascade, a protein linking extracellular PrP^C to p59fyn is needed, given the attachment of the enzyme to the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane through palmitoylated/myristoylated anchors. In this, the PrP^C partner N-CAM (isoform 140) seems ideal to fulfill the task, given that p59fyn is part of N-CAM-mediated signaling. Indeed, after recruitment of N-CAM to lipid rafts—which may also depend on PrP^C,¹³—together with the receptor protein Tyr phosphatase α (RPTPα), the Tyr-phosphate removing activity of RPTPα allows the subsequent activation of p59fyn through an autophosphorylation step.⁴⁸ This event recruits and activates the focal adhesion kinase (FAK),¹¹ another non-receptor Tyr kinase. Finally, formation of the FAK-p59fyn complex triggers neuritogenesis through both Erk1/2 and PI3K/Akt pathways.^49,50 Parenthetically, the FAK-p59fyn and PI3K/Akt connection would be suitable to explain why aggravation of ischemic brain injury in PrP-deficient brains was linked to a depressed Akt activation.³¹ FAK-p59fyn complex, however, may be also involved in the signal triggered by the still mysterious PrP^C partner, 67LR. This protein was reported not only to act as a laminin receptor but also to facilitate the interaction of laminin with integrins,⁵¹ thereby possibly activating (through integrins) FAK-p59fyn-regulated pathways.⁴⁹ Conversely, other data have supported the candidature of caveolin-1 for coordinating the signal that from PrP^C reaches Erk1/2 through p59fyn.^44,45,52 Further scrutiny of this route has shown that it comprised players such as laminin and integrins (upstream), FAK-p59fyn, paxillin and the Src-homology-2 domain containing adaptor protein (downstream), and that caveolin-1, a substrate of the FAK-p59fyn complex, facilitated the interaction of these signaling partners by recruiting them in caveolae-like membrane domains.⁵³For the relevance they bear, we need to acknowledge recent propositions supporting the commitment of PrP^C with proteins whose function is unrelated from the above-mentioned cell adhesion or ECM molecules; namely, the β-site amyloid precursor protein (APP) cleaving enzime (BACE1) and the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor. BACE1 is a proteolytic enzyme involved in Aβ production. It has been shown that overexpressed PrP^C restricted, while depletion of PrP^C increased the access of BACE1 to APP, possibly because PrP^C interacts with BACE1 via GAGs.⁵⁴ Thus, native PrP^C reduces the production of Aβ peptides. A beneficial effect of PrP^C was also highlighted by Khosravani et al.⁵⁵ showing that, by physically associating with the subunit 2D of the NMDA-receptor, PrP^C attenuated neuronal Ca²⁺ entry and its possible excitotoxic effect. This clear example for the control of PrP^C on Ca²⁺ metabolism is particularly intriguing in light of previous reports linking Ca²⁺ homeostasis to PrP^C pathophysiology (reviewed in ref. ⁵⁶). Also, it is important to mention that a few partners of PrP^C or downstream effectors may initiate signals that increase intracellular Ca²⁺, and that, in turn, local Ca²⁺ fluctuations regulate some of the afore-mentioned pathways.^11,49,57,58In conclusion, although still somehow speculative, the implication of Ca²⁺ in PrP^C-dependent pathways raises the possibility that the different input signals originating from the interaction of PrP^C with diverse partners may all converge to the universal, highly versatile Ca²⁺ signaling. Were indeed this the case, then clearly the acting of PrP^C as Harlequin, the famous character of the 18^th century Venetian playwright Carlo Goldoni, who struggles to fill the orders of two masters, would be merely circumstantial.     

Nitric oxide production is not required for dihydrosphingosine-induced cell death in tobacco BY-2 cells

Sphinganine or dihydrosphingosine (d18:0, DHS), one of the most abundant free sphingoid Long Chain Base (LCB) in plants, is known to induce a calcium-dependent programmed cell death (PCD) in tobacco BY-2 cells. We have recently shown that DHS triggers a production of H₂O₂, via the activation of NADPH oxidase(s). However, this production of H₂O₂ is not correlated with the DHS-induced cell death but would rather be associated with basal cell defense mechanisms. In the present study, we extend our current knowledge of the DHS signaling pathway, by demonstrating that DHS also promotes a production of nitric oxide (NO) in tobacco BY-2 cells. As for H₂O₂, this NO production is not necessary for cell death induction.Key words: tobacco BY-2 cells, sphingolipids, LCBs, dihydrosphingosine, sphinganine, apoptosis, programmed cell death (PCD), nitric oxide (NO)These last few years, it has been demonstrated in plants that long chain bases (LCBs), the sphingolipid precursors, are important regulators of different cellular processes including programmed cell death (PCD).^1–3 Indeed, plant treatment with fumonisin B1 or AAL toxin, two mycotoxins that disrupt sphingolipid metabolism, leads to an accumulation of the dihydrosphingosine (d18:0, DHS), one of the most abundant free LCB in plants and correlatively to the induction of cell death symptoms.^4,5 A more recent study shows a rapid and sustained increase of phytosphingosine (t18:0), due to a de novo synthesis from DHS, when Arabidopsis thaliana leaves are inoculated with the avirulent strain Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (avrRpm1), known to induce a localized PCD called hypersensitive response (HR).⁶ More direct evidences were obtained from experiments on Arabidopsis cells where external application of 100 µM C2-ceramide, a non-natural acylated LCB, induced PCD in a calcium (Ca²⁺)-dependent manner.⁷ Recently, we have shown that DHS elicited rapid Ca²⁺ increases both in the cytosol and the nucleus of tobacco BY-2 cells and correlatively induced apoptotic-like response. Interestingly, blocking nuclear Ca²⁺ changes without affecting the cytosolic Ca²⁺ increases prevented DHS-induced PCD.⁸Besides calcium ions, reactive oxygen species (ROS) have also been suggested to play an important role in the control of PCD induced by sphingolipids in plants.⁹ Thus, the C2-ceramide-induced PCD in Arabidopsis is preceded by an increase in H₂O₂.⁷ However, inhibition of ROS production by catalase, a ROS-scavenging enzyme, did not prevent C2-ceramide-induced cell death, suggesting that this PCD is independent of ROS generation. Moreover, we recently showed in tobacco BY-2 cells that DHS triggers a dose-dependent production of H₂O₂ via activation of a NADPH oxidase.¹⁰ The DHS-induced cytosolic Ca²⁺ transient is required for this H₂O₂ production while the nuclear calcium variation is not necessary. In agreement with the results of Townley et al. blocking the ROS production using diphenyleniodonium (DPI), a known inhibitor of NADPH oxidases, does not prevent DHS-induced cell death. Gene expression analysis of defense-related genes, using real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) experiments, rather indicates that H₂O₂ generation is likely associated with basal defense mechanisms.¹⁰In the present study, we further investigated the DHS signaling cascade leading to cell death in tobacco BY-2 cells, by evaluating the involvement of another key signaling molecule i.e., nitric oxide (NO). In plants, NO is known to play important roles in numerous physiological processes including germination, root growth, stomatal closing and adapative response to biotic and abiotic stresses (reviewed in ref. ^11–14). NO has also been shown to be implicated in the induction of PCD in animal cells,¹⁵ in yeast,¹⁶ as well as in plant cells, in which it is required for tracheid differentiation¹⁷ or HR activation.^18,19 Interestingly in the latter case, the balance between NO and H₂O₂ production appears to be crucial to induce cell death.²⁰ Here we show in tobacco BY-2 cells that although DHS elicits a production of NO, this production is not necessary for the induction of PCD.     

Auxin acts independently of DELLA proteins in regulating gibberellin levels

Shoot elongation is a vital process for plant development and productivity, in both ecological and economic contexts. Auxin and bioactive gibberellins (GAs), such as GA₁, play critical roles in the control of elongation,^1–3 along with environmental and endogenous factors, including other hormones such as the brassinosteroids.^4,5 The effect of auxins, such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), is at least in part mediated by its effect on GA metabolism,⁶ since auxin upregulates biosynthesis genes such as GA 3-oxidase and GA 20-oxidase and downregulates GA catabolism genes such as GA 2-oxidases, leading to elevated levels of bioactive GA₁.⁷ In our recent paper,¹ we have provided evidence that this action of IAA is largely independent of DELLA proteins, the negative regulators of GA action,^8,9 since the auxin effects are still present in the DELLA-deficient la cry-s genotype of pea. This was a crucial issue to resolve, since like auxin, the DELLAs also promote GA₁ synthesis and inhibit its deactivation. DELLAs are deactivated by GA, and thereby mediate a feedback system by which bioactive GA regulates its own level.¹⁰ However, our recent results,¹ in themselves, do not show the generality of the auxin-GA relationship across species and phylogenetic groups or across different tissue types and responses. Further, they do not touch on the ecological benefits of the auxin-GA interaction. These issues are discussed below as well as the need for the development of suitable experimental systems to allow this process to be examined.Key words: auxin, gibberellins, DELLA proteins, interactions, elongation     

Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase-�� and Src Functionally Link Focal Adhesions to the Endoplasmic Reticulum to Mediate Interleukin-1-induced Ca2+ Signaling

Calcium (Ca²⁺) signaling by the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-1 (IL-1) is dependent on focal adhesions, which contain diverse structural and signaling proteins including protein phosphatases. We examined here the role of protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) α in regulating IL-1-induced Ca²⁺ signaling in fibroblasts. IL-1 promoted recruitment of PTPα to focal adhesions and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) fractions, as well as tyrosine phosphorylation of the ER Ca²⁺ release channel IP₃R. In response to IL-1, catalytically active PTPα was required for Ca²⁺ release from the ER, Src-dependent phosphorylation of IP₃R1 and accumulation of IP₃R1 in focal adhesions. In pulldown assays and immunoprecipitations PTPα was required for the association of PTPα with IP₃R1 and c-Src, and this association was increased by IL-1. Collectively, these data indicate that PTPα acts as an adaptor to mediate functional links between focal adhesions and the ER that enable IL-1-induced Ca²⁺ signaling.The interleukin-1 (IL-1)³ family of pro-inflammatory cytokines mediates host responses to infection and injury. Impaired control of IL-1 signaling leads to chronic inflammation and destruction of extracellular matrices (1, 2), as seen in pathological conditions such as pulmonary fibrosis (3), rheumatoid arthritis (4, 5), and periodontitis (6). IL-1 elicits multiple signaling programs, some of which trigger Ca²⁺ release from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) as well as expression of multiple cytokines and inflammatory factors including c-Fos and c-Jun (7, 8), and matrix metalloproteinases (9, 10), which mediate extracellular matrix degradation via mitogen-activated protein kinase-regulated pathways (11).In anchorage-dependent cells including fibroblasts and chondrocytes, focal adhesions (FAs) are required for IL-1-induced Ca²⁺ release from the ER and activation of ERK (12–14). FAs are actin-enriched adhesive domains composed of numerous (>50) scaffolding and signaling proteins (15–17). Many FA proteins are tyrosine-phosphorylated, including paxillin, focal adhesion kinase, and src family kinases, all of which are crucial for the assembly and disassembly of FAs (18–21). Protein-tyrosine phosphorylation plays a central role in regulating many cellular processes including adhesion (22, 23), motility (24), survival (25), and signal transduction (26–29). Phosphorylation of proteins by kinases is balanced by protein-tyrosine phosphatases (PTP), which can enhance or attenuate downstream signaling by dephosphorylation of tyrosine residues (30–32).PTPs can be divided into two main categories: receptor-like and intracellular PTPs (33). Two receptor-like PTPs have been localized to FA (leukocyte common antigen-related molecule and PTPα). Leukocyte common antigen-related molecule can dephosphorylate and mediate degradation of p130^cas, which ultimately leads to cell death (34, 35). PTPα contains a heavily glycosylated extracellular domain, a transmembrane domain, and two intracellular phosphatase domains (33, 36). The amino-terminal domain predominantly mediates catalytic activity, whereas the carboxyl-terminal domain serves a regulatory function (37, 38). PTPα is enriched in FA (23) and is instrumental in regulating FA dynamics (39) via activation of c-Src/Fyn kinases by dephosphorylating the inhibitory carboxyl tyrosine residue, namely Tyr⁵²⁹ (22, 40–42) and facilitation of integrin-dependent assembly of Src-FAK and Fyn-FAK complexes that regulate cell motility (43). Although PTPα has been implicated in formation and remodeling of FAs (44, 45), the role of PTPα in FA-dependent signaling is not defined.Ca²⁺ release from the ER is a critical step in integrin-dependent IL-1 signal transduction and is required for downstream activation of ERK (13, 46). The release of Ca²⁺ from the ER depends on the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor (IP₃R), which is an IP₃-gated Ca²⁺ channel (47). All of the IP₃R subtypes (subtypes 1–3) have been localized to the ER, as well as other the plasma membrane and other endomembranes (48–50). Further, IP₃R may associate with FAs, enabling the anchorage of the ER to FAs (51, 52). However, the molecule(s) that provide the structural link for this association has not been defined.FA-restricted, IL-1-triggered signal transduction in anchorage-dependent cells may rely on interacting proteins that are enriched in FAs and the ER (53). Here, we examined the possibility that PTPα associates with c-Src and IP₃R to functionally link FAs to the ER, thereby enabling IL-1 signal transduction.