Crystal structures of the extracellular domains of the CrRLK1L receptor‐like kinases ANXUR1 and ANXUR2

Catharanthus roseus Receptor‐Like Kinase 1‐like (CrRLK1L) proteins contain two tandem malectin‐like modules in their extracellular domains (ECDs) and function in diverse signaling pathways in plants. Malectin is a carbohydrate‐binding protein in animals and recognizes a number of diglucosides; however, it remains unclear how the two malectin‐like domains in the CrRLK1L proteins sense the ligand molecule. In this study, we reveal the crystal structures of the ECDs of ANXUR1 and ANXUR2, two CrRLK1L members in Arabidopsis thaliana that have critical functions in controlling pollen tube rupture during the fertilization process. We show that the two malectin‐like domains in these proteins pack together to form a rigid architecture. Unlike animal malectin, these malectin‐like domains lack residues involved in binding to the diglucosides, suggesting that they have a distinct ligand‐binding mechanism. A cleft is observed between the two malectin‐like domains, which might function as a potential ligand‐binding pocket.     

A novel signal transduction protein: Combination of solute binding and tandem PAS‐like sensor domains in one polypeptide chain

We report the structural and biochemical characterization of a novel periplasmic ligand‐binding protein, Dret_0059, from Desulfohalobium retbaense DSM 5692, an organism isolated from Lake Retba, in Senegal. The structure of the protein consists of a unique combination of a periplasmic solute binding protein (SBP) domain at the N‐terminal and a tandem PAS‐like sensor domain at the C‐terminal region. SBP domains are found ubiquitously, and their best known function is in solute transport across membranes. PAS‐like sensor domains are commonly found in signal transduction proteins. These domains are widely observed as parts of many protein architectures and complexes but have not been observed previously within the same polypeptide chain. In the structure of Dret_0059, a ketoleucine moiety is bound to the SBP, whereas a cytosine molecule is bound in the distal PAS‐like domain of the tandem PAS‐like domain. Differential scanning flourimetry support the binding of ligands observed in the crystal structure. There is significant interaction between the SBP and tandem PAS‐like domains, and it is possible that the binding of one ligand could have an effect on the binding of the other. We uncovered three other proteins with this structural architecture in the non‐redundant sequence data base, and predict that they too bind the same substrates. The genomic context of this protein did not offer any clues for its function. We did not find any biological process in which the two observed ligands are coupled. The protein Dret_0059 could be involved in either signal transduction or solute transport.     

What is the relationship between the global structures of apo and holo proteins?

It is well known that ligand binding and release may induce a wide range of structural changes in a receptor protein, varying from small movements of loops or side chains in the binding pocket to large‐scale domain hinge‐bending and shear motions or even partial unfolding that facilitates the capture and release of a ligand. An interesting question is what in general are the conformational changes triggered by ligand binding? The aim of this work is analyze the magnitude of structural changes in a protein resulting from ligand binding to assess if the state of ligand binding needs to be included in template‐based protein structure prediction algorithms. To address this issue, a nonredundant dataset of 521 paired protein structures in the ligand‐free and ligand‐bound form was created and used to estimate the degree of both local and global structure similarity between the apo and holo forms. In most cases, the proteins undergo relatively small conformational rearrangements of their tertiary structure upon ligand binding/release (most root‐mean‐square‐deviations from native, RMSD, are <1 Å). However, a clear difference was observed between single‐ and multiple‐domain proteins. For the latter, RMSD changes greater than 1 Å and sometimes larger were found for almost 1/3 of the cases; these are mainly associated with large‐scale hinge‐bending movements of entire domains. The changes in the mutual orientation of individual domains in multiple‐domain proteins upon ligand binding were investigated using a mechanistic model based on mass‐weighted principal axes as well as interface buried surface calculations. Some preferences toward the anticipated mechanism of protein domain movements are predictable based on the examination of just the ligand‐free structural form. These results have applications to protein structure prediction, particularly in the context of protein domain assembly, if additional information concerning ligand binding is exploited. Proteins 2008. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Protein function annotation by local binding site surface similarity

Hundreds of protein crystal structures exist for proteins whose function cannot be confidently determined from sequence similarity. Surflex‐PSIM, a previously reported surface‐based protein similarity algorithm, provides an alternative method for hypothesizing function for such proteins. The method now supports fully automatic binding site detection and is fast enough to screen comprehensive databases of protein binding sites. The binding site detection methodology was validated on apo/holo cognate protein pairs, correctly identifying 91% of ligand binding sites in holo structures and 88% in apo structures where corresponding sites existed. For correctly detected apo binding sites, the cognate holo site was the most similar binding site 87% of the time. PSIM was used to screen a set of proteins that had poorly characterized functions at the time of crystallization, but were later biochemically annotated. Using a fully automated protocol, this set of 8 proteins was screened against ～60,000 ligand binding sites from the PDB. PSIM correctly identified functional matches that predated query protein biochemical annotation for five out of the eight query proteins. A panel of 12 currently unannotated proteins was also screened, resulting in a large number of statistically significant binding site matches, some of which suggest likely functions for the podorly characterized proteins. Proteins 2014; 82:679–694. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Exploring new strategies for grafting binding peptides onto protein loops using a consensus‐designed tetratricopeptide repeat scaffold

Peptide display approaches, in which peptide epitopes of known binding activities are grafted onto stable protein scaffolds, have been developed to constrain the peptide in its bioactive conformation and to enhance its stability. However, peptide grafting can be a lengthy process requiring extensive computational modeling and/or optimisation by directed evolution techniques. In this study, we show that ultra‐stable consensus‐designed tetratricopeptide repeat (CTPR) proteins are amenable to the grafting of peptides that bind the Kelch‐like ECH‐associated protein 1 (Keap1) onto the loop between adjacent repeats. We explore simple strategies to optimize the grafting process and show that modest improvements in Keap1‐binding affinity can be obtained by changing the composition of the linker sequence flanking either side of the binding peptide.     

Transport capabilities of environmental Pseudomonads for sulfur compounds

Sulfur is an essential element in plant rhizospheres and microbial activity plays a key role in increasing the biological availability of sulfur in soil environments. To better understand the mechanisms facilitating the exchange of sulfur‐containing molecules in soil, we profiled the binding specificities of eight previously uncharacterized ABC transporter solute‐binding proteins from plant‐associated Pseudomonads. A high‐throughput screening procedure indicated eighteen significant organosulfur binding ligands, with at least one high‐quality screening hit for each protein target. Calorimetric and spectroscopic methods were used to validate the best ligand assignments and catalog the thermodynamic properties of the protein‐ligand interactions. Two novel high‐affinity ligand‐binding activities were identified and quantified in this set of solute‐binding proteins. Bacteria were cultured in minimal media with screening library components supplied as the sole sulfur sources, demonstrating that these organosulfur compounds can be metabolized and confirming the relevance of ligand assignments. These results expand the set of experimentally validated ligands amenable to transport by this ABC transporter family and demonstrate the complex range of protein‐ligand interactions that can be accomplished by solute‐binding proteins. Characterizing new nutrient import pathways provides insight into Pseudomonad metabolic capabilities which can be used to further interrogate bacterial survival and participation in soil and rhizosphere communities.     

Autoinhibited proteins as promising drug targets

Current drug discovery efforts generally focus on a limited number of protein classes, typically including proteins with well-defined catalytic active sites (e.g., kinases) or ligand binding sites (e.g., G protein-coupled receptors). Nevertheless, many clinically important pathways are mediated by proteins with no such obvious targets for small molecule inhibitors. Allosteric inhibitors offer an alternative approach to inhibition of protein activities, particularly for proteins that undergo conformational changes as part of their activity cycle. Proteins regulated by autoinhibitory domains represent one broad class of proteins that meets this criterion. In this article, we discuss the potential of autoinhibited proteins as targets for allosteric inhibitors and describe two examples of small molecules that act by stabilizing native autoinhibited conformations of their targets. We propose that proteins regulated by autoinhibition may be generally amenable to allosteric inhibition by small molecules that stabilize the native, autoinhibited fold.     

Generation of targeted mutant rice using a CRISPR‐Cpf1 system

CRISPR‐Cpf1 is a newly identified CRISPR‐Cas system, and Cpf1 was recently engineered as a molecular tool for targeted genome editing in mammalian cells. To test whether the engineered CRISPR‐Cpf1 system could induce the production of rice mutants, we selected two genome targets in the OsPDS and OsBEL genes. Our results show that both targets could be efficiently mutated in transgenic rice plants using CRISPR‐Cpf1. We found that pre‐crRNAs with a full‐length direct repeat sequence exhibited considerably increased efficiencies compared with mature crRNAs. In addition, the specificity and transmission of the mutation were investigated, and the behaviours of crRNA‐Cpf1‐induced plant targeted genome mutagenesis were assessed. Taken together, our results indicate that CRISPR‐Cpf1 expression via stable transformation can efficiently generate specific and heritable targeted mutations in rice and thereby constitutes a novel and important approach to specific and precise plant genome editing.     

Structures of designed armadillo repeat proteins binding to peptides fused to globular domains

Designed armadillo repeat proteins (dArmRP) are α‐helical solenoid repeat proteins with an extended peptide binding groove that were engineered to develop a generic modular technology for peptide recognition. In this context, the term “peptide” not only denotes a short unstructured chain of amino acids, but also an unstructured region of a protein, as they occur in termini, loops, or linkers between folded domains. Here we report two crystal structures of dArmRPs, in complex with peptides fused either to the N‐terminus of Green Fluorescent Protein or to the C‐terminus of a phage lambda protein D. These structures demonstrate that dArmRPs bind unfolded peptides in the intended conformation also when they constitute unstructured parts of folded proteins, which greatly expands possible applications of the dArmRP technology. Nonetheless, the structures do not fully reflect the binding behavior in solution, that is, some binding sites remain unoccupied in the crystal and even unexpected peptide residues appear to be bound. We show how these differences can be explained by restrictions of the crystal lattice or the composition of the crystallization solution. This illustrates that crystal structures have to be interpreted with caution when protein–peptide interactions are characterized, and should always be correlated with measurements in solution.     

Modifying ligand specificity of gene regulatory proteins

Nuclear receptors contain a conserved hydrophobic ligand binding pocket that is particularly amenable to structure-based protein engineering. Thus, site-directed mutagenesis of the ligand binding pocket has resulted in the creation of nuclear receptors with novel ligand specificities. Such proteins are now being used to control gene expression in vivo in a ligand-dependent manner.     

Cell adhesion regulates the interaction between the docking protein p130(Cas) and the 14-3-3 proteins

Integrin ligand binding induces a signaling complex formation via the direct association of the docking protein p130(Cas) (Cas) with diverse molecules. We report here that the 14-3-3zeta protein interacts with Cas in the yeast two-hybrid assay. We also found that the two proteins associate in mammalian cells and that this interaction takes place in a phosphoserine-dependent manner, because treatment of Cas with a serine phosphatase greatly reduced its ability to bind 14-3-3zeta. Furthermore, the Cas-14-3-3zeta interaction was found to be regulated by integrin-mediated cell adhesion. Thus, when cells are detached from the extracellular matrix, the binding of Cas to 14-3-3zeta is greatly diminished, whereas replating the cells onto fibronectin rapidly induces the association. Consistent with these results, we found that the subcellular localization of Cas and 14-3-3 is also regulated by integrin ligand binding and that the two proteins display a significant co-localization during cell attachment to the extracellular matrix. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that 14-3-3 proteins participate in integrin-activated signaling pathways through their interaction with Cas, which, in turn, may contribute to important biological responses regulated by cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix.     

Linkers in the structural biology of protein–protein interactions

Linkers or spacers are short amino acid sequences created in nature to separate multiple domains in a single protein. Most of them are rigid and function to prohibit unwanted interactions between the discrete domains. However, Gly‐rich linkers are flexible, connecting various domains in a single protein without interfering with the function of each domain. The advent of recombinant DNA technology made it possible to fuse two interacting partners with the introduction of artificial linkers. Often, independent proteins may not exist as stable or structured proteins until they interact with their binding partner, following which they gain stability and the essential structural elements. Gly‐rich linkers have been proven useful for these types of unstable interactions, particularly where the interaction is weak and transient, by creating a covalent link between the proteins to form a stable protein–protein complex. Gly‐rich linkers are also employed to form stable covalently linked dimers, and to connect two independent domains that create a ligand‐binding site or recognition sequence. The lengths of linkers vary from 2 to 31 amino acids, optimized for each condition so that the linker does not impose any constraints on the conformation or interactions of the linked partners. Various structures of covalently linked protein complexes have been described using X‐ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance and cryo‐electron microscopy techniques. In this review, we evaluate several structural studies where linkers have been used to improve protein quality, to produce stable protein–protein complexes, and to obtain protein dimers.     

Comparison analysis of primary ligand‐binding sites in seven‐helix membrane proteins

Seven‐helix transmembrane proteins, including the G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs), mediate a broad range of fundamental cellular activities through binding to a wide range of ligands. Understanding the structural basis for the ligand‐binding selectivity of these proteins is of significance to their structure‐based drug design. Comparison analysis of proteins' ligand‐binding sites provides a useful way to study their structure‐activity relationships. Various computational methods have been developed for the binding‐site comparison of soluble proteins. In this work, we applied this approach to the analysis of the primary ligand‐binding sites of 92 seven‐helix transmembrane proteins. Results of the studies confirmed that the binding site of bacterial rhodopsins is indeed different from all GPCRs. In the latter group, further comparison of the binding sites indicated a group of residues that could be responsible for ligand‐binding selectivity and important for structure‐based drug design. Furthermore, unexpected binding‐site dissimilarities were observed among adrenergic and adenosine receptors, suggesting that the percentage of the overall sequence identity between a target protein and a template protein alone is not sufficient for selecting the best template for homology modeling of seven‐helix membrane proteins. These results provided novel insight into the structural basis of ligand‐binding selectivity of seven‐helix membrane proteins and are of practical use to the computational modeling of these proteins. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 95: 31–38, 2011.     

An automatic method involving cluster analysis of secondary structures for the identification of domains in proteins.

With a growing number of structures available in the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank, automatic methods for domain identification are required for the construction of databases. Domains are considered to be clusters of secondary structure elements. Thus, helices and strands are first clustered using intersecondary structural distances between C alpha positions, and dendrograms based on this distance measure are used to identify domains. Individual domains are recognized by a disjoint factor, which enables the automatic identification and classification into disjoint, interacting, and conjoint domains. Application to a database of 83 protein families and 18 unique structures shows that the approach provides an effective delineation of boundaries and identifies those proteins that can be considered as a single domain. A quantitative estimate of the interaction between domains has been proposed. The database of protein domains is a useful tool for understanding protein folding, for recognizing protein folds, and for understanding structure-activity relationships.     

Identification of Semaphorin 5A Interacting Protein by Applying Apriori Knowledge and Peptide Complementarity Related to Protein Evolution and Structure

In the post-genomic era, various computational methods that predict proteinprotein interactions at the genome level are available; however, each method has its own advantages and disadvantages, resulting in false predictions. Here we developed a unique integrated approach to identify interacting partner（s） of Semaphorin 5A （SEMA5A）, beginning with seven proteins sharing similar ligand interacting residues as putative binding partners. The methods include Dwyer and Root- Bernstein/Dillon theories of protein evolution, hydropathic complementarity of protein structure, pattern of protein functions among molecules, information on domain-domain interactions, co-expression of genes and protein evolution. Among the set of seven proteins selected as putative SEMA5A interacting partners, we found the functions of Plexin B3 and Neuropilin-2 to be associated with SEMA5A. We modeled the semaphorin domain structure of Plexin B3 and found that it shares similarity with SEMA5A. Moreover, a virtual expression database search and RT-PCR analysis showed co-expression of SEMA5A and Plexin B3 and these proteins were found to have co-evolved. In addition, we confirmed the interaction of SEMA5A with Plexin B3 in co-immunoprecipitation studies. Overall, these studies demonstrate that an integrated method of prediction can be used at the genome level for discovering many unknown protein binding partners with known ligand binding domains.