The PDZ and band 4.1 containing protein Frmpd1 regulates the subcellular location of activator of G-protein signaling 3 and its interaction with G-proteins

Activator of G-protein signaling 3 (AGS3) is one of nine mammalian proteins containing one or more G-protein regulatory (GPR) motifs that stabilize the GDP-bound conformation of Galpha(i). Such proteins have revealed unexpected functional diversity for the "G-switch" in the control of events within the cell independent of the role of heterotrimeric G-proteins as transducers for G-protein-coupled receptors at the cell surface. A key question regarding this class of proteins is what controls their subcellular positioning and interaction with G-proteins. We conducted a series of yeast two-hybrid screens to identify proteins interacting with the tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) of AGS3, which plays an important role in subcellular positioning of the protein. We report the identification of Frmpd1 (FERM and PDZ domain containing 1) as a regulatory binding partner of AGS3. Frmpd1 binds to the TPR domain of AGS3 and coimmunoprecipitates with AGS3 from cell lysates. Cell fractionation indicated that Frmpd1 stabilizes AGS3 in a membrane fraction. Upon cotransfection of COS7 cells with Frmpd1-GFP and AGS3-mRFP, AGS3-mRFP is observed in regions of the cell cortex and also in membrane extensions or processes where it appears to be colocalized with Frmpd1-GFP based upon the merged fluorescent signals. Frmpd1 knockdown (siRNA) in Cath.a-differentiated neuronal cells decreased the level of endogenous AGS3 in membrane fractions by approximately 50% and enhanced the alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor-mediated inhibition of forskolin-induced increases in cAMP. The coimmunoprecipitation of Frmpd1 with AGS3 is lost as the amount of Galpha(i3) in the cell is increased and AGS3 apparently switches its binding partner from Frmpd1 to Galpha(i3) indicating that the interaction of AGS3 with Frmpd1 and Galpha(i3) is mutually exclusive. Mechanistically, Frmpd1 may position AGS3 in a membrane environment where it then interacts with Galpha(i) in a regulated manner.     

A direct interaction between oncogenic Ha-Ras and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is not required for Ha-Ras-dependent transformation of epithelial cells

Cells expressing oncogenic Ras proteins transmit a complex set of signals that ultimately result in constitutive activation of signaling molecules, culminating in unregulated cellular function. Although the role of oncogenic Ras in a variety of cellular responses including transformation, cell survival, differentiation, and migration is well documented, the direct Ras/effector interactions that contribute to the different Ras biological end points have not been as clearly defined. Observations by other groups in which Ras-dependent transformation can be blocked by expression of either dominant negative forms of Phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase or PTEN, a 3-phosphoinositide-specific phosphatase, support an essential role for PI 3-kinase and its lipid products in the transformation process. These observations coupled with the in vitro observations that the catalytic subunits of PI 3-kinase, the p110 isoforms, bind directly to Ras-GTP foster the implication that a direct interaction between an oncogenic Ras protein and PI 3-kinase are causal in the oncogenicity of mutant Ras proteins. Using an activated Ha-Ras protein (Y64G/Y71G/F156L) that fails to interact with PI 3-kinase, we demonstrate that oncogenic Ha-Ras does not require a direct interaction with PI 3-kinase to support anchorage-independent growth of IEC-6 epithelial cells. We do find, however, that IEC-6 cells expressing an oncogenic Ha-Ras protein that no longer binds PI 3-kinase are greatly impaired in their ability to migrate toward fibronectin.     

Prenylated Rab acceptor protein is a receptor for prenylated small GTPases

Localization of Ras and Ras-like proteins to the correct subcellular compartment is essential for these proteins to mediate their biological effects. Many members of the Ras superfamily (Ha-Ras, N-Ras, TC21, and RhoA) are prenylated in the cytoplasm and then transit through the endomembrane system on their way to the plasma membrane. The proteins that aid in the trafficking of the small GTPases have not been well characterized. We report here that prenylated Rab acceptor protein (PRA1), which others previously identified as a prenylation-dependent receptor for Rab proteins, also interacts with Ha-Ras, RhoA, TC21, and Rap1a. The interaction of these small GTPases with PRA1 requires their post-translational modification by prenylation. The prenylation-dependent association of PRA1 with multiple GTPases is conserved in evolution; the yeast PRA1 protein associates with both Ha-Ras and RhoA. Earlier studies reported the presence of PRA1 in the Golgi, and we show here that PRA1 co-localizes with Ha-Ras and RhoA in the Golgi compartment. We suggest that PRA1 acts as an escort protein for small GTPases by binding to the hydrophobic isoprenoid moieties of the small GTPases and facilitates their trafficking through the endomembrane system.     

Agonist-dependent traffic of raft-associated Ras and Raf-1 is required for activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade

Stimulation of HIRcB fibroblasts with insulin leads to accumulation of active components of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade in endocytic compartments. However, the factors that regulate the mobilization of these components through the endocytic pathway and the relevance of this event to cellular signaling remain unclear. Here we report that Ras proteins are associated with lipid rafts in resting HIRcB fibroblasts. Ras is rapidly internalized into the endocytic compartment following stimulation with insulin. The redistribution of Ras is independent of its activation. Attachment of the C-terminal 20 amino acids of Ha-Ras to green fluorescent protein was sufficient to target this construct to the same loci as the endogenous Ras protein, indicating that Ras distribution is a consequence of the association of its lipid modified C terminus with membranes. Depletion of plasma membrane cholesterol delocalized Ras and blocked insulin-dependent Ras traffic. Cholesterol depletion also blocked insulin-dependent phosphorylation of MEK and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) but had no effects on the translocation and activation of Raf-1. A second inhibitor of endocytosis, cytochalasin D, also blocked insulin-dependent MAPK phosphorylation. Taken together, these results suggest that mobilization of active Raf-1 through the endocytic compartment is required for completion of the MAPK cascade.     

G alpha selectivity and inhibitor function of the multiple GoLoco motif protein GPSM2/LGN

GPSM2 (G-protein signalling modulator 2; also known as LGN or mammalian Pins) is a protein that regulates mitotic spindle organization and cell division. GPSM2 contains seven tetratricopeptide repeats (TPR) and four Galpha(i/o)-Loco (GoLoco) motifs. GPSM2 has guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI) activity towards both Galpha(o)- and Galpha(i)-subunits; however, a systematic analysis of its individual GoLoco motifs has not been described. We analyzed each of the four individual GoLoco motifs from GPSM2, assessing their relative binding affinities and GDI potencies for Galpha(i1), Galpha(i2), and Galpha(i3) and Galpha(o). Each of the four GPSM2 GoLoco motifs (36-43 amino acids in length) was expressed in bacteria as a GST-fusion protein and purified to homogeneity. The binding of each of the four GST-GoLoco motifs to Galpha(i1)-, Galpha(o)-, and Galpha(s)-subunits was assessed by surface plasmon resonance; all of the motifs bound Galpha(i1), but exhibited low affinity towards Galpha(o). GDI activity was assessed by a fluorescence-based nucleotide-binding assay, revealing that all four GoLoco motifs are functional as GDIs for Galpha(i1), Galpha(i2), and Galpha(i3). Consistent with our binding studies, the GDI activity of GPSM2 GoLoco motifs on Galpha(o) was significantly lower than that toward Galpha(i1), suggesting that the in vivo targets of GPSM2 are most likely to be Galpha(i)-subunits.     

Interaction of alpha1-syntrophin with multiple isoforms of heterotrimeric G protein alpha subunits

Syntrophins are components of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex of the plasma membrane in muscular and neuronal cells, and recruit signaling proteins such as neuronal nitric oxide synthase via their multiple protein-protein interaction motifs. In this study, we found that alpha1-syntrophin binds to various subtypes of guanine nucleotide-binding protein alpha subunits (Galpha). A pull-down analysis using full-length recombinant alpha1-syntrophin and MS analysis showed that alpha1-syntrophin was coprecipitated with several isoforms of Galpha proteins in addition to known binding partners such as dystrobrevin and neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Further analysis using recombinant Galpha isoforms showed that alpha1-syntrophin associates with at least Galphai, Galphao, Galphas and Galphaq subtypes. The region of alpha1-syntrophin required for its interaction with Galphas was determined as the N-terminal half of the first pleckstrin homology domain. In addition, the syntrophin unique domain of alpha1-syntrophin was suggested to contribute to this interaction. In COS-7 cells, downregulation of alpha1-syntrophin by RNAi resulted in enhanced cAMP production and cAMP response element-binding protein phosphorylation induced by isoproterenol treatment. These results suggest that alpha1-syntrophin provides a scaffold for the Galpha family of heterotrimeric G proteins in the brain to regulate the efficiency of signal transduction evoked by G-protein-coupled receptors.     

Basis for signaling specificity difference between Sos and Ras-GRF guanine nucleotide exchange factors

Sos and Ras-GRF are two families of guanine nucleotide exchange factors that activate Ras proteins in cells. Sos proteins are ubiquitously expressed and are activated in response to cell-surface tyrosine kinase stimulation. In contrast, Ras-GRF proteins are expressed primarily in central nervous system neurons and are activated by calcium/calmodulin binding and by phosphorylation. Although both Sos1 and Ras-GRF1 activate the Ras proteins Ha-Ras, N-Ras, and Ki-Ras, only Ras-GRF1 also activates the functionally distinct R-Ras GTPase. In this study, we determined which amino acid sequences in these exchange factors and their target GTPases are responsible for this signaling specificity difference. Analysis of chimeras and individual amino acid exchanges between Sos1 and Ras-GRF1 revealed that the critical amino acids reside within an 11-amino acid segment of their catalytic domains between the second and third structurally conserved regions (amino acids (aa) 828-838 in Sos1 and 1057-1067 in Ras-GRF1) of Ras guanine nucleotide exchange factors. In Sos1, this segment is in helix B, which is known to interact with the switch 2 region of Ha-Ras. Interestingly, a similar analysis of Ha-Ras and R-Ras chimeras did not identify the switch 2 region of Ha-Ras as encoding specificity. Instead, we found a more distal protein segment, helix 3 (aa 91-103 in Ha-Ras and 117-129 in R-Ras), which interacts instead primarily with helix K (aa 1002-1016) of Sos1. These findings suggest that specificity derives from the fact that R-Ras-specific amino acids in the region analogous to Ha-Ras helix 3 prevent a functional interaction with Sos1 indirectly, possibly by preventing an appropriate association of its switch 2 region with helix B of Sos1. Although previous studies have shown that helix B of Sos1 and helix 3 of Ha-Ras are involved in promoting nucleotide exchange on Ras proteins, this study highlights the importance of these regions in establishing signaling specificity.     

Interaction of activator of G-protein signaling 3 (AGS3) with LKB1, a serine/threonine kinase involved in cell polarity and cell cycle progression: phosphorylation of the G-protein regulatory (GPR) motif as a regulatory mechanism for the interaction of GPR motifs with Gi alpha

Activator of G-protein signaling 3 (AGS3) has a modular domain structure consisting of seven tetratricopeptide repeats (TPRs) and four G-protein regulatory (GPR) motifs. Each GPR motif binds to the alpha subunit of Gi/Go (Gialpha > Goalpha) stabilizing the GDP-bound conformation of Galpha and apparently competing with Gbetagamma for GalphaGDP binding. As an initial approach to identify regulatory mechanisms for AGS3-G-protein interactions, a yeast two-hybrid screen was initiated using the TPR and linker region of AGS3 as bait. This screen identified the serine/threonine kinase LKB1, which is involved in the regulation of cell cycle progression and polarity. Protein interaction assays in mammalian systems using transfected cells or brain lysate indicated the regulated formation of a protein complex consisting of LKB1, AGS3, and G-proteins. The interaction between AGS3 and LKB1 was also observed with orthologous proteins in Drosophila where both proteins are involved in cell polarity. LKB1 immunoprecipitates from COS7 cells transfected with LKB1 phosphorylated the GPR domains of AGS3 and the related protein LGN but not the AGS3-TPR domain. GPR domain phosphorylation was completely blocked by a consensus GPR motif peptide, and placement of a phosphate moiety within a consensus GPR motif reduced the ability of the peptide to interact with G-proteins. These data suggest that phosphorylation of GPR domains may be a general mechanism regulating the interaction of GPR-containing proteins with G-proteins. Such a mechanism may be of particular note in regard to localized signal processing in the plasma membrane involving G-protein subunits and/or intracellular functions regulated by heterotrimeric G-proteins that occur independently of a typical G-protein-coupled receptor.     

The arginine finger loop of yeast and human GAP is a determinant for the specificity toward Ras GTPase.

In this work, we have studied the role of the arginine finger region in determining the specificity of the GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ira2p and human p120-GAP toward yeast Ras2p and human Ha-Ras p21. It is known that p120-GAP can enhance both Ras2p and Ha-Ras GTPase activities, whereas Ira2p is strictly specific for Ras2p and fails to activate Ha-Ras GTPase. Substitution in Ira2p of the arginine following the arginine finger with alanine, the residue found in the corresponding position of p120-GAP, or by glycine as found in neurofibromin, evokes a low but significant stimulation of Ha-Ras GTPase. The stimulatory activity of Ira2p on Ha-Ras increased by substituting segments of the finger loop region with p120-GAP residues, especially with the six residues forming the tip of the arginine loop. In p120-GAP, substitution of the entire finger loop with the corresponding region of Ira2p led to a construct completely inactive on Ha-Ras GTPase but active on yeast Ras2p GTPase. Analysis of these results and modeling of Ira2p.Ras complexes emphasize the importance of the finger loop region not only for the catalytic activity but also as a structural determinant involved in the specificity of GAPs toward Ras proteins from different organisms.     

Galpha(12) and Galpha(13) interact with Ser/Thr protein phosphatase type 5 and stimulate its phosphatase activity

The Galpha subunits of the G(12) family of heterotrimeric G proteins, defined by Galpha(12) and Galpha(13), are involved in many signaling pathways and diverse cellular functions. In an attempt to elucidate downstream effectors of Galpha(12) for cellular functions, we have performed a yeast two-hybrid screening of a rat brain cDNA library and revealed that Ser/Thr protein phosphatase type 5 (PP5) is a novel effector of Galpha(12) and Galpha(13). PP5 is a newly identified phosphatase and consists of a C-terminal catalytic domain and an N-terminal regulatory tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain [2]. Arachidonic acid was recently shown to activate PP5 phosphatase activity by binding to its TPR domain, however the precise regulatory mechanism of PP5 phosphatase activity is not fully determined. In this study, we show that active forms of Galpha(12) and Galpha(13) specifically interact with PP5 through its TPR domain and activate its phosphatase activity about 2.5-fold. Active forms of Galpha(12) and Galpha(13) also enhance the arachidonic acid-stimulated PP5 phosphatase activity about 2.5-fold. Moreover, we demonstrate that the active form of Galpha(12) translocates PP5 to the cell periphery and colocalizes with PP5. These results propose a new signaling pathway of G(12) family G proteins.     

Four human ras homologs differ in their abilities to activate Raf-1, induce transformation, and stimulate cell motility.

Human cells contain four homologous Ras proteins, but it is unknown whether each of these Ras proteins participates in distinct signal transduction cascades or has different biological functions. To directly address these issues, we assessed the relative ability of constitutively active (G12V) versions of each of the four Ras homologs to activate the effector protein Raf-1 in vivo. In addition, we compared their relative abilities to induce transformed foci, enable anchorage-independent growth, and stimulate cell migration. We found a distinct hierarchy between the four Ras homologs in each of the parameters studied. The hierarchies were as follows: for Raf-1 activation, Ki-Ras 4B > Ki-Ras 4A > N-Ras > Ha-Ras; for focus formation, Ha-Ras >/= Ki-Ras 4A > N-Ras = Ki-Ras 4B; for anchorage-independent growth, Ki-Ras 4A >/= N-Ras > Ki-Ras 4B = Ha-Ras = no growth; and for cell migration, Ki-Ras 4B > Ha-Ras > N-Ras = Ki-Ras 4A = no migration. Our results indicate that the four Ras homologs significantly differ in their abilities to activate Raf-1 and induce distinctly different biological responses. These studies, in conjunction with our previous report that demonstrated that the Ras homologs can be differentially activated by upstream guanine nucleotide exchange factors (Jones, M. K., and Jackson, J. H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1782-1787), indicate that each of the four Ras proteins may qualitatively or quantitatively participate in distinct signaling cascades and have significantly different biological roles in vivo. Importantly, these studies also suggest for the first time that the distinct and likely cooperative biological functions of the Ki-ras-encoded Ki-Ras 4A and Ki-Ras 4B proteins may help explain why constitutively activating mutations of Ki-ras, but not N-ras or Ha-ras, are frequently detected in human carcinomas.     

Co-operative versus independent transport of different cargoes by Kinesin-1

Kinesin motors drive the intracellular transport of multiple cargoes along microtubule tracks; yet, how kinesins discriminate among their many potential cargoes is unknown. We tested whether Kinesin-1 cargoes compete, co-operate or are transported independently of each other. We focused on Kinesin-1 cargoes that bind directly to the kinesin light chain (KLC) subunit, namely the c-Jun NH₂-terminal kinase-interacting proteins (JIPs) 1 and 3, Kidins220/ARMS and PAT1. Overexpression of individual cargo proteins in differentiated CAD cells resulted in mislocalization of the endogenous protein but had no effect on localization of other cargo proteins to neurite tips. Thus, while transport of distinct cargoes is saturable, they do not compete with each other. Interestingly, we found that low expression of JIP1 or JIP3 enhanced the transport of the other JIP to neurite tips. Moreover, JIP1 and JIP3 require each other for transport. Co-operative transport is due to an interaction between JIP1 and JIP3 as well as distinct binding sites on the KLC tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) bundle: the TPR groove binds to C-terminal residues of JIP1, whereas the TPR surface binds to internal residues in JIP3. Formation of a JIP1/JIP3/KLC complex is necessary for efficient JIP1 or JIP3 transport in neuronal cells. Thus, JIP scaffolding proteins are transported in a co-operative manner, despite the independent transport of other Kinesin-1 cargoes.