Coordinate genetic control of yeast fatty acid synthase genes FAS1 and FAS2 by an upstream activation site common to genes involved in membrane lipid biosynthesis.

A systematic search for upstream controlling elements necessary for efficient expression of the yeast fatty acid synthase genes FAS1 and FAS2 revealed identical activation sites, UASFAS, in front of both FAS genes. The individual element confers, in a heterologous yeast test system, an approximately 40-fold stimulation of basal gene expression. The UASFAS motifs identified have the consensus sequence TYTTCACATGY and function in either orientation. The same sequence motif is found in the upstream regions of all so far characterized yeast genes encoding enzymes of phospholipid biosynthesis. In gel retardation assays, a protein factor, Fbf1 (FAS binding factor), was identified which interacted with UASFAS. The UASFAS motif proved to be an inositol/choline responsive element (ICRE) conferring strict repression by exogenous inositol and choline on a heterologous reporter gene. Its core sequence perfectly matches the CANNTG motif typical of basic helix-loop-helix DNA-binding proteins. In contrast to the individual UASFAS element, the intact yeast FAS promoters are not significantly influenced by inositol and choline, and thus allow nearly constitutive fatty acid synthase production. Available evidence suggests that additional cis- and trans-acting elements, other than UASFAS and Fbf1, are involved in this constitutive FAS gene expression.     

Regulation of the yeast INO1 gene. The products of the INO2, INO4 and OPI1 regulatory genes are not required for repression in response to inositol

The ino2Delta, ino4Delta, opi1Delta, and sin3Delta mutations all affect expression of INO1, a structural gene for inositol-1-phosphate synthase. These same mutations affect other genes of phospholipid biosynthesis that, like INO1, contain the repeated element UAS(INO) (consensus 5' CATGTGAAAT 3'). In this study, we evaluated the effects of these four mutations, singly and in all possible combinations, on growth and expression of INO1. All strains carrying an ino2Delta or ino4Delta mutation, or both, failed to grow in medium lacking inositol. However, when grown in liquid culture in medium containing limiting amounts of inositol, the opi1Delta ino4Delta strain exhibited a level of INO1 expression comparable to, or higher than, the wild-type strain growing under the same conditions. Furthermore, INO1 expression in the opi1Delta ino4Delta strain was repressed in cells grown in medium fully supplemented with both inositol and choline. Similar results were obtained using the opi1Delta ino2Delta ino4Delta strain. Regulation of INO1 was also observed in the absence of the SIN3 gene product. Therefore, while Opi1p, Sin3p, and the Ino2p/Ino4p complex all affect the overall level of INO1 expression in an antagonistic manner, they do not appear to be responsible for transmitting the signal that leads to repression of INO1 in response to inositol. Various models for Opi1p function were tested and no evidence for binding of Opi1p to UAS(INO), or to Ino2p or Ino4p, was obtained.     

The INO2 and INO4 loci of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are pleiotropic regulatory genes.

We isolated a mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae defective in the formation of phosphatidylcholine via methylation of phosphatidylethanolamine. The mutant synthesized phosphatidylcholine at a reduced rate and accumulated increased amounts of methylated phospholipid intermediates. It was also found to be auxotrophic for inositol and allelic to an existing series of ino4 mutants. The ino2 and ino4 mutants, originally isolated on the basis of an inositol requirement, are unable to derepress the cytoplasmic enzyme inositol-1-phosphate synthase (myo-inositol-1-phosphate synthase; EC 5.5.1.4). The INO4 and INO2 genes were, thus, previously identified as regulatory genes whose wild-type product is required for expression of the INO1 gene product inositol-1-phosphate synthase (T. Donahue and S. Henry, J. Biol. Chem. 256:7077-7085, 1981). In addition to the identification of a new ino4-allele, further characterization of the existing series of ino4 and ino2 mutants, reported here, demonstrated that they all have a reduced capacity to convert phosphatidylethanolamine to phosphatidylcholine. The pleiotropic phenotype of the ino2 and ino4 mutants described in this paper suggests that the INO2 and INO4 loci are involved in the regulation of phospholipid methylation in the membrane as well as inositol biosynthesis in the cytoplasm.     

The yeast inositol-sensitive upstream activating sequence, UASINO, responds to nitrogen availability

The INO1 gene of yeast is expressed in logarithmically growing, wild-type cells when inositol is absent from the medium. However, the INO1 gene is repressed when inositol is present during logarithmic growth and it is also repressed as cells enter stationary phase whether inositol is present or not. In this report, we demonstrate that transient nitrogen limitation also causes INO1 repression. The repression of INO1 in response to nitrogen limitation shares many features in common with repression in response to the presence of inositol. Specifically, the response to nitrogen limitation is dependent upon the presence of a functional OPI1 gene product, it requires ongoing phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis and it is mediated by the repeated element, UASINO, found in the promoter of INO1 and other co-regulated genes of phospholipid biosynthesis. Thus, we propose that repression of INO1 in response to inositol and in response to nitrogen limitation occurs via a common mechanism that is sensitive to the status of ongoing phospholipid metabolism.     

Inositol regulates phosphatidylglycerolphosphate synthase expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The enzyme phosphatidylglycerolphosphate synthase (PGPS; CDPdiacylglycerol-glycerol-3-phosphate 3-phosphatidyltransferase; EC 2.7.8.5) catalyzes the committed step in the synthesis of cardiolipin, a phospholipid found predominantly in the mitochondrial inner membrane. To determine whether PGPS is regulated by cross-pathway control, we analyzed PGPS expression under conditions in which the regulation of general phospholipid synthesis could be examined. The addition of inositol resulted in a three- to fivefold reduction in PGPS expression in wild-type cells in the presence or absence of exogenous choline. The reduction in enzyme activity in response to inositol was seen in minutes, suggesting that inactivation or degradation of the enzyme plays an important role in inositol-mediated repression of PGPS. In cho2 and opi3 mutants, which are blocked in phosphatidylcholine synthesis, inositol-mediated repression of PGPS did not occur unless choline was added to the media. Three previously identified genes that regulate general phospholipid synthesis, INO2, INO4, and OP11, did not affect PGPS expression. Thus, ino2 and ino4 mutants, which are unable to derepress biosynthetic enzymes involved in general phospholipid synthesis, expressed wild-type levels of PGPS activity under derepressing conditions. PGPS expression in the opi1 mutant, which exhibits constitutive synthesis of general phospholipid biosynthetic enzymes, was fully repressed in the presence of inositol and partially repressed even in the absence of inositol. These results demonstrate for the first time that an enzymatic step in cardiolipin synthesis is coordinately controlled with general phospholipid synthesis but that this control is not mediated by the same genetic regulatory circuit.