Specific recognition of rpsO mRNA and 16S rRNA by Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S15 relies on both mimicry and site differentiation

The ribosomal protein S15 binds to 16S rRNA, during ribosome assembly, and to its own mRNA (rpsO mRNA), affecting autocontrol of its expression. In both cases, the RNA binding site is bipartite with a common subsite consisting of a G*U/G-C motif. The second subsite is located in a three-way junction in 16S rRNA and in the distal part of a stem forming a pseudoknot in Escherichia coli rpsO mRNA. To determine the extent of mimicry between these two RNA targets, we determined which amino acids interact with rpsO mRNA. A plasmid carrying rpsO (the S15 gene) was mutagenized and introduced into a strain lacking S15 and harbouring an rpsO-lacZ translational fusion. Analysis of deregulated mutants shows that each subsite of rpsO mRNA is recognized by a set of amino acids known to interact with 16S rRNA. In addition to the G*U/G-C motif, which is recognized by the same amino acids in both targets, the other subsite interacts with amino acids also involved in contacts with helix H22 of 16S rRNA, in the region adjacent to the three-way junction. However, specific S15-rpsO mRNA interactions can also be found, probably with A(-46) in loop L1 of the pseudoknot, demonstrating that mimicry between the two targets is limited.     

A competition mechanism regulates the translation of the Escherichia coli operon encoding ribosomal proteins L35 and L20

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein (r-protein) L20 is essential for the assembly of the 50S ribosomal subunit and is also a translational regulator of its own rpmI-rplT operon, encoding r-proteins L35 and L20 in that order. L20 directly represses the translation of the first cistron and, through translational coupling, that of its own gene. The translational operator of the operon is 450 nt in length and includes a long-range pseudoknot interaction between two RNA sequences separated by 280 nt. L20 has the potential to bind both to this pseudoknot and to an irregular hairpin, although only one site is occupied at a time during regulation. This work shows that the rpmI-rplT operon is regulated by competition between L20 and the ribosome for binding to mRNA in vitro and in vivo. Detailed studies on the regulatory mechanisms of r-protein synthesis have only been performed on the rpsO gene, regulated by r-protein S15, and on the alpha operon, regulated by S4. Both are thought to be controlled by a trapping mechanism, whereby the 30S ribosomal subunit, the mRNA, and the initiator tRNA are blocked as a nonfunctional preternary complex. This alternative mode of regulation of the rpmI-rplT operon raises the possibility that control is kinetically and not thermodynamically limited in this case. We show that the pseudoknot, which is known to be essential for L20 binding and regulation, also enhances 30S binding to mRNA as if this structure is specifically recognised by the ribosome.     

Molecular dissection of the pseudoknot governing the translational regulation of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S15.

The ribosomal protein S15 controls its own translation by binding to a mRNA region overlapping the ribosome binding site. That region of the mRNA can fold in two mutually exclusive conformations that are in dynamic equilibrium: a structure with two hairpins and a pseudoknot. A mutational analysis provided evidence for the existence and requirement of the pseudoknot for translational control in vivo and S15 recognition in vitro. In this study, we used chemical probing to analyze the structural consequences of mutations and their effect on the stem-loop/pseudoknot equilibrium. Interactions between S15 and the pseudoknot structure were further investigated by footprinting experiments. These data, combined with computer modelling and the previously published data on S15 binding and in vivo control, provide important clues on pseudoknot formation and S15 recognition. An unexpected result is that the relevant control element, here the pseudoknot form, can exist in a variety of topologically equivalent structures recognizable and shapable by S15. S15 sits on the deep groove of the co-axial stack and makes contacts with both stems, shielding the bridging adenine. The only specific sequence determinants are found in the helix common to the pseudoknot and the hairpin structures.     

Conformity of RNAs that interact with tetranucleotide loop binding proteins.

A group of RNA binding proteins, termed tetraloop binding proteins, includes ribosomal protein S15 and protein SRP19 of signal recognition particle. They are primary RNA binding proteins, recognize RNA tetranucleotide loops with a GNAR consensus motif, and require a helical region located adjacent to the tetraloop. Closely related RNA structures that fit these criteria appear in helix 6 of SRP RNA, in helices 22 and 23A of 16 S ribosomal RNA, and, as a pseudoknot, in the regulatory region of the rpsO gene.     

Ribosomes inhibit an RNase E cleavage which induces the decay of the rpsO mRNA of Escherichia coli.

The hypothesis generally proposed to explain the stabilizing effect of translation on many bacterial mRNAs is that ribosomes mask endoribonuclease sites which control the mRNA decay rate. We present the first demonstration that ribosomes interfere with a particular RNase E processing event responsible for mRNA decay. These experiments used an rpsO mRNA deleted of the translational operator where ribosomal protein S15 autoregulates its synthesis. We demonstrate that ribosomes inhibit the RNase E cleavage, 10 nucleotides downstream of the rpsO coding sequence, responsible for triggering the exonucleolytic decay of the message mediated by polynucleotide phosphorylase. Early termination codons and insertions which increase the length of ribosome-free mRNA between the UAA termination codon and this RNase E site destabilize the translated mRNA and facilitate RNase E cleavage, suggesting that ribosomes sterically inhibit RNase E access to the processing site. Accordingly, a mutation which reduces the distance between these two sites stabilizes the mRNA. Moreover, an experiment showing that a 10 nucleotide insertion which destabilizes the untranslated mRNA does not affect mRNA stability when it is inserted in the coding sequence of a translated mRNA demonstrates that ribosomes can mask an RNA feature, 10-20 nucleotides upstream of the processing site, which contributes to the RNase E cleavage efficiency.     

Expression of the rpsO and pnp genes: structural analysis of a DNA fragment carrying their control regions.

Precise physical mapping of the genes rpsO and pnp coding respectively for ribosomal protein S15 and polynucleotide phosphorylase together with regions involved in the regulation of their expression has been obtained by the analysis of in vitro deletion mutants. The results suggest that each gene has its own promotor, but that there is coexpression of rpsO and pnp. The nucleotide sequence of rpsO and of the beginning of pnp is presented and includes the presumed regulatory regions of these genes. Several features of the sequence support the mapping experiments and are discussed in relation to the expression of the ribosomal and pnp genes.     

Structural elements of rps0 mRNA involved in the modulation of translational initiation and regulation of E. coli ribosomal protein S15.

Previous experiments showed that S15 inhibits its own translation by binding to its mRNA in a region overlapping the ribosome loading site. This binding was postulated to stabilize a pseudoknot structure that exists in equilibrium with two stem-loops and to trap the ribosome on its mRNA loading site in a transitory state. In this study, we investigated the effect of mutations in the translational operator on: the binding of protein S15, the formation of the 30S/mRNA/tRNA(fMet) ternary initiation complex, the ability of S15 to inhibit the formation of this ternary complex. The results were compared to in vivo expression and repression rates. The results show that (1) the pseudoknot is required for S15 recognition and translational control; (2) mRNA and 16S rRNA efficiently compete for S15 binding and 16S rRNA suppresses the ability of S15 to inhibit the formation of the active ternary complex; (3) the ribosome binds more efficiently to the pseudoknot than to the stem-loop; (4) sequences located between nucleotides 12 to 47 of the S15 coding phase enhances the efficiency of ribosome binding in vitro; this is correlated with enhanced in vivo expression and regulation rates.     

Do mRNA and rRNA binding sites of E.coli ribosomal protein S15 share common structural determinants?

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S15 recognizes two RNA targets: a three-way junction in 16S rRNA and a pseudoknot structure on its own mRNA. Binding to mRNA occurs when S15 is expressed in excess over its rRNA target, resulting in an inhibition of translation start. The sole apparent similarity between the rRNA and mRNA targets is the presence of a G-U/G-C motif that contributes only modestly to rRNA binding but is essential for mRNA. To get more information on the structural determinants used by S15 to bind its mRNA target as compared to its rRNA site, we used site-directed mutagenesis, substitution by nucleotide analogs, footprinting experiments on both RNA and protein, and graphic modeling. The size of the mRNA-binding site could be reduced to 45 nucleotides, without loss of affinity. This short RNA preferentially folds into a pseudoknot, the formation of which depends on magnesium concentration and temperature. The size of the loop L2 that bridges the two stems of the pseudoknot through the minor groove could not be reduced below nine nucleotides. Then we showed that the pseudoknot recognizes the same side of S15 as 16S rRNA, although shielding a smaller surface area. It turned out that the G-U/G-C motif is recognized from the minor groove in both cases, and that the G-C pair is recognized in a very similar manner. However, the wobble G-U pair of the mRNA is not directly contacted by S15, as in rRNA, but is most likely involved in building a precise conformation of the RNA, essential for binding. Otherwise, unique specific features are utilized, such as the three-way junction in the case of 16S rRNA and the looped out A(-46) for the mRNA pseudoknot.     

Translational autocontrol of the Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S15

When rpsO, the gene encoding the ribosomal protein S15 in Escherichia coli, is carried by a multicopy plasmid, the mRNA synthesis rate of S15 increases with the gene dosage but the rate of synthesis of S15 does not rise. A translational fusion between S15 and beta-galactosidase was introduced on the chromosome in a delta lac strain and the expression of beta-galactosidase studied under different conditions. The presence of S15 in trans represses the beta-galactosidase level five- to sixfold, while the synthesis rate of the S15-beta-galactosidase mRNA decreases by only 30 to 50%. These data indicate that S15 is subject to autogenous translational control. Derepressed mutants were isolated and sequenced. All the point mutations map in the second codon of S15, suggesting a location for the operator site that is very near to the translation initiation codon. However, the creation of deletion mutations shows that the operator extends into the 5' non-coding part of the message, thus overlapping the ribosome loading site.     

Mutational analysis of the pseudoknot structure of the S15 translational operator from Escherichia coli

Expression of rpsO, the gene encoding the small ribosomal protein S15, is autoregulated at the translational level by S15, which binds to its mRNA in a region overlapping the ribosome-binding site. By measuring the effect of mutations on the expression of a translational rpsO-lacZ fusion and the S15 binding affinity for the translational operator, the formation of a pseudoknot in the operator site in vivo is fully demonstrated and appears to be a prerequisite for S15 binding. The mutational analysis suggests also that specific determinants for S15 binding are located in very limited regions of the structure formed by the pseudoknot. It is deduced that a specific pseudoknot conformation is a key element for autoregulation.     

Ribosomal protein S15 represses its own translation via adaptation of an rRNA-like fold within its mRNA

The 16S rRNA-binding ribosomal protein S15 is a key component in the assembly of the small ribosomal subunit in bacteria. We have shown that S15 from the extreme thermophile Thermus thermophilus represses the translation of its own mRNA in vitro, by interacting with the leader segment of its mRNA. The S15 mRNA-binding site was characterized by footprinting experiments, deletion analysis and site-directed mutagenesis. S15 binding triggers a conformational rearrangement of its mRNA into a fold that mimics the conserved three-way junction of the S15 rRNA-binding site. This conformational change masks the ribosome entry site, as demonstrated by direct competition between the ribosomal subunit and S15 for mRNA binding. A comparison of the T.thermophilus and Escherichia coli regulation systems reveals that the two regulatory mRNA targets do not share any similarity and that the mechanisms of translational inhibition are different. Our results highlight an astonishing plasticity of mRNA in its ability to adapt to evolutionary constraints, that contrasts with the extreme conservation of the rRNA-binding site.     

Evidence for allosteric coupling between the ribosome and repressor binding sites of a translationally regulated mRNA

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S4 is a translational repressor regulating the expression of four ribosomal genes in the alpha operon. In vitro studies have shown that the protein specifically recognizes an unusual mRNA pseudoknot secondary structure which links sequences upstream and downstream of the ribosome binding site for rpsM (S13) [Tang, C. K., & Draper, D. E. (1989) Cell 57, 531]. We have prepared fusions of the rpsM translational initiation site and lacZ that allows us to detect repression in cells in which overproduction of S4 repressor can be induced. Twenty-five mRNA sequence variants have been introduced into the S13-lacZ fusions and the levels of translational repression measured. Sets of compensating base changes confirm the importance of the pseudoknot secondary structure for translational repression. An A residue in a looped, single-stranded sequence is also required for S4 recognition and may contact S4 directly. Comparison of translational repression levels and S4 binding constants for the set of mRNA mutations show that nine mutants are repressed much more weakly than predicted from their affinity for S4; in extreme cases no repression can be detected for variants with unchanged S4 binding. We suggest that the mRNA contains functionally distinct ribosome and repressor binding sites that are allosterically coupled. Mutations can relieve translational repression by disrupting the linkage between the two sites without altering S4 binding. This proposal assigns to the mRNA a more active role in mediating translational repression than found in other translational repression systems.     

A novel screening system for self-mRNA targeting proteins

Here we describe the application of an in vitro translation system for genetic screening, to identify RNA-binding proteins that bind to their own mRNAs. It is a relatively novel system designed using an advanced cell-free translation system reconstructed with purified translational components. Due to the absence of nucleases and proteases, the complex of mRNA and nascent polypeptide synthesized in this system is expected to exhibit high stability ensuring the following efficient selection toward the protein. Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S15, which is known to bind to its own mRNA, was employed as a model molecule to evaluate the system. Wild-type S15 mRNA specifically isolated from a mutant mRNA lacking the secondary structure responsible for binding the S15 protein accumulated markedly after several rounds of selection-amplification. The success of this selection demonstrates the potentiality of the systematic screening of self-mRNA targeting proteins through direct and functional selection. This strategy as a method to identify peptides or proteins that bind to their own mRNAs, is of general interest and has different potential applications, such as, the identification of new regulatory proteins or peptide motifs for RNA recognition, the study of self-mRNA-protein interactions, etc.     

A pseudoknot improves selection efficiency in ribosome display

The size and diversity of ribosome display libraries depends upon stability of the complex formed between the ribosome, mRNA and translated protein. To investigate if mRNA secondary structure improves stability of the complex, we tested a pseudoknot, originating from the genomic RNA of infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), a member of the positive-stranded coronavirus group. We used the previously-isolated anti-DNA scFv, 3D8, as a target protein. During in vitro translation in rabbit reticulocyte lysate, we observed that incorporation of the pseudoknot into the mRNA resulted in production of a translational intermediate that corresponded to the expected size for ribosomal arrest at the pseudoknot. Complexes containing the mRNA pseudoknot exhibited a higher efficiency of affinity selection than that those without, indicating that the pseudoknot improves stability of the mRNA-ribosome-antibody complex in a eukaryotic translation system. Thus, in order to improve the efficiency of selection, this relatively short pseudoknot sequence could be incorporated into ribosome display.     

Translational repression of the Escherichia coli alpha operon mRNA: importance of an mRNA conformational switch and a ternary entrapment complex

Ribosomal protein S4 represses synthesis of the four ribosomal proteins (including itself) in the Escherichia coli alpha operon by binding to a nested pseudoknot structure that spans the ribosome binding site. A model for the repression mechanism previously proposed two unusual features: (i) the mRNA switches between conformations that are "active" or "inactive" in translation, with S4 as an allosteric effector of the inactive form, and (ii) S4 holds the 30 S subunit in an unproductive complex on the mRNA ("entrapment"), in contrast to direct competition between repressor and ribosome binding ("displacement"). These two key points have been experimentally tested. First, it is found that the mRNA pseudoknot exists in an equilibrium between two conformers with different electrophoretic mobilities. S4 selectively binds to one form of the RNA, as predicted for an allosteric effector; binding of ribosomal 30 S subunits is nearly equal in the two forms. Second, we have used S4 labeled at a unique cysteine with either of two fluorophores to characterize its interactions with mRNA and 30 S subunits. Equilibrium experiments detect the formation of a specific ternary complex of S4, mRNA pseudoknot, and 30 S subunits. The existence of this ternary complex is unambiguous evidence for translational repression of the alpha operon by an entrapment mechanism.     

Halting a cellular production line: responses to ribosomal pausing during translation

Cellular protein synthesis is a complex polymerization process carried out by multiple ribosomes translating individual mRNAs. The process must be responsive to rapidly changing conditions in the cell that could cause ribosomal pausing and queuing. In some circumstances, pausing of a bacterial ribosome can trigger translational abandonment via the process of trans-translation, mediated by tmRNA (transfer-messenger RNA) and endonucleases. Together, these factors release the ribosome from the mRNA and target the incomplete polypeptide for destruction. In eukaryotes, ribosomal pausing can initiate an analogous process carried out by the Dom34p and Hbs1p proteins, which trigger endonucleolytic attack of the mRNA, a process termed mRNA no-go decay. However, ribosomal pausing can also be employed for regulatory purposes, and controlled translational delays are used to help co-translational folding of the nascent polypeptide on the ribosome, as well as a tactic to delay translation of a protein while its encoding mRNA is being localized within the cell. However, other responses to pausing trigger ribosomal frameshift events. Recent discoveries are thus revealing a wide variety of mechanisms used to respond to translational pausing and thus regulate the flow of ribosomal traffic on the mRNA population.     

Translational control of ribosomal protein S15

The expression of ribosomal protein S15 is shown to be translationally and negatively autocontrolled using a fusion within a reporter gene. Isolation and characterization of several deregulated mutants indicate that the regulatory site (the translational operator site) overlaps the ribosome loading site of the S15 messenger. In this region, three domains, each exhibiting a stem-loop structure, were determined using chemical and enzymatic probes. The most downstream hairpin carries the Shine-Dalgarno sequence and the initiation codon. Genetic and structural data derived from mutants constructed by site-directed mutagenesis show that the operator is a dynamic structure, two domains of which can form a pseudoknot. Binding of S15 to these two domains suggests that the pseudoknot could be stabilized by S15. A model is presented in which two alternative structures would explain the molecular basis of the S15 autocontrol.     

A new plant protein interacts with eIF3 and 60S to enhance virus‐activated translation re‐initiation

The plant viral re‐initiation factor transactivator viroplasmin (TAV) activates translation of polycistronic mRNA by a re‐initiation mechanism involving translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) and the 60S ribosomal subunit (60S). QJ;Here, we report a new plant factor—re‐initiation supporting protein (RISP)—that enhances TAV function in re‐initiation. RISP interacts physically with TAV in vitro and in vivo. Mutants defective in interaction are less active, or inactive, in transactivation and viral amplification. RISP alone can serve as a scaffold protein, which is able to interact with eIF3 subunits a/c and 60S, apparently through the C‐terminus of ribosomal protein L24. RISP pre‐bound to eIF3 binds 40S, suggesting that RISP enters the translational machinery at the 43S formation step. RISP, TAV and 60S co‐localize in epidermal cells of infected plants, and eIF3–TAV–RISP–L24 complex formation can be shown in vitro. These results suggest that RISP and TAV bridge interactions between eIF3‐bound 40S and L24 of 60S after translation termination to ensure 60S recruitment during repetitive initiation events on polycistronic mRNA; RISP can thus be considered as a new component of the cell translation machinery.