Sensory function above lesion level in spinal cord injury patients with and without pain

Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) may or may not develop central neuropathic pain despite having cord lesions of apparently the same site, extension and nature. The consequences of the cord lesion in the central nervous system and the mechanisms underlying pain are unclear. In this study, we examined sensory detection and pain thresholds above injury level in 17 SCI patients with central neuropathic pain, in 18 SCI patients without neuropathic pain, and in 20 control subjects without injury and pain. The SCI pain group had significantly higher cold and warm detection thresholds compared with the SCI pain free group and controls and higher tactile detection thresholds compared with the SCI pain free group. No difference in pain or pain tolerance thresholds was seen among pain and pain free SCI patients. These data suggest changes in somatosensory function in dermatomes rostral to the segmental injury level linked to the presence of central neuropathic pain in SCI patients. The results are discussed in relation to current concepts of pain inhibitory and facilitating systems.     

Single session exercises and concurrent functional electrical stimulation are more effective on muscles’ force generation than only exercises in spinal cord injured persons: a feasibility study

Objectives:To evaluate impact of first therapy session, containing functional electrical stimulation (FES) and therapeutic exercises (TE) on erector spinae (ES) and rectus abdominis (RA) force generation in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).Methods:Five men with SCI were divided in two groups - FES+TE received concurrent FES on ES and RA and TE, TE only TE. Participants performed exercises for improving sitting balance and posture. Muscles’ electrical activity was evaluated by electromyography; amplitude (AEMG) and median frequency (MF) were used for analysis.Results:AEMG of ES left (L) increased 292.9% (g=-0.92), right (R) 175% (g=-1.01), RA L 314.3% (g=-0,81, P<0.05), R 266.7% (g=-0.08) in FES+TE. AEMG of ES L increased 47.6% (g=-0.46), R 96.4% (g=-0.95); RA L 7.1% (g=-0.97), but R decreased 6.7% (g=0.12) in TE. MF of ES L increased 108.5% (g=-0.74), R 184% (g=-1.25); RA L 886.7% (g=3-05, P<0.05), R 817.6% (g=-2.55, P<0.05) in FES+TE. MF of ES L increased 95.2% (g=-1.02), R 161.4% (g=-1.64); RA L 3,2% (g=-0.06), R 30.8% (g=-0.46) in TE.Conclusions:In SCI persons, single session exercises and concurrent functional electrical stimulation may be more effective on muscles` force generation than only exercises. However, replication of the results is needed before clinical implementation.     

Evaluation of Respiratory Muscle Activation Using Respiratory Motor Control Assessment (RMCA) in Individuals with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

During breathing, activation of respiratory muscles is coordinated by integrated input from the brain, brainstem, and spinal cord. When this coordination is disrupted by spinal cord injury (SCI), control of respiratory muscles innervated below the injury level is compromised^1,2 leading to respiratory muscle dysfunction and pulmonary complications. These conditions are among the leading causes of death in patients with SCI³. Standard pulmonary function tests that assess respiratory motor function include spirometrical and maximum airway pressure outcomes: Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV₁), Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (PI_max) and Maximal Expiratory Pressure (PE_max)^4,5. These values provide indirect measurements of respiratory muscle performance⁶. In clinical practice and research, a surface electromyography (sEMG) recorded from respiratory muscles can be used to assess respiratory motor function and help to diagnose neuromuscular pathology. However, variability in the sEMG amplitude inhibits efforts to develop objective and direct measures of respiratory motor function⁶. Based on a multi-muscle sEMG approach to characterize motor control of limb muscles⁷, known as the voluntary response index (VRI)⁸, we developed an analytical tool to characterize respiratory motor control directly from sEMG data recorded from multiple respiratory muscles during the voluntary respiratory tasks. We have termed this the Respiratory Motor Control Assessment (RMCA)⁹. This vector analysis method quantifies the amount and distribution of activity across muscles and presents it in the form of an index that relates the degree to which sEMG output within a test-subject resembles that from a group of healthy (non-injured) controls. The resulting index value has been shown to have high face validity, sensitivity and specificity^9-11. We showed previously⁹ that the RMCA outcomes significantly correlate with levels of SCI and pulmonary function measures. We are presenting here the method to quantitatively compare post-spinal cord injury respiratory multi-muscle activation patterns to those of healthy individuals.