Structure of the Tyrosine-sulfated C5a Receptor N Terminus in Complex with Chemotaxis Inhibitory Protein of Staphylococcus aureus

Complement component C5a is a potent pro-inflammatory agent inducing chemotaxis of leukocytes toward sites of infection and injury. C5a mediates its effects via its G protein-coupled C5a receptor (C5aR). Although under normal conditions highly beneficial, excessive levels of C5a can be deleterious to the host and have been related to numerous inflammatory diseases. A natural inhibitor of the C5aR is chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus (CHIPS). CHIPS is a 121-residue protein excreted by S. aureus. It binds the N terminus of the C5aR (residues 1-35) with nanomolar affinity and thereby potently inhibits C5a-mediated responses in human leukocytes. Therefore, CHIPS provides a starting point for the development of new anti-inflammatory agents. Two O-sulfated tyrosine residues located at positions 11 and 14 within the C5aR N terminus play a critical role in recognition of C5a, but their role in CHIPS binding has not been established so far. By isothermal titration calorimetry, using synthetic Tyr-11- and Tyr-14-sulfated and non-sulfated C5aR N-terminal peptides, we demonstrate that the sulfate groups are essential for tight binding between the C5aR and CHIPS. In addition, the NMR structure of the complex of CHIPS and a sulfated C5aR N-terminal peptide reveals the precise binding motif as well as the distinct roles of sulfated tyrosine residues sY11 and sY14. These results provide a molecular framework for the design of novel CHIPS-based C5aR inhibitors.The human complement system is a key component of the innate host defense directed against invading pathogens. Complement component C5a is a 74-residue glycoprotein generated via complement activation by cleavage of the α-chain of its precursor C5. C5a is a strong chemoattractant involved in the recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes, activation of phagocytes, release of granule-based enzymes, and in the generation of oxidants (1, 2). C5a exerts its effect by activating the C5a receptor (C5aR).³ Although this is a highly efficient process, excessive or erroneous activation of the C5aR can have deleterious effects on host tissues. C5a has been implicated in the pathogenesis of many inflammatory and immunological diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, immune complex disease, and reperfusion injury (3, 4). Consequently, there is an active ongoing search for compounds that suppress C5a-mediated inflammatory responses.Chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus (CHIPS) is a 121-residue protein excreted by S. aureus, which efficiently inhibits the activation of neutrophils and monocytes by formylated peptides and C5a (5, 6). CHIPS specifically binds to the formylated peptide receptor (FPR) and the C5aR with nanomolar affinity (K_d = 35.4 ± 7.7 nm and 1.1 ± 0.2 nm, respectively) (7), thereby suppressing the inflammatory response of the host. A CHIPS fragment lacking residues 1-30 (designated CHIPS_31-121) has the same activity in blocking the C5aR compared with wild-type CHIPS (8). CHIPS_31-121 is a compact protein comprising an α-helix packed onto a four-stranded anti-parallel β-sheet (8). C5a has an entirely different fold (PDB ID code 1KJS) and is comprised of an anti-parallel bundle of four α-helices stabilized by three disulfide bonds (9, 10). Preliminary experiments indicated that CHIPS binds exclusively to the extracellular N-terminal portion of the C5aR (7). In contrast, the binding of C5a by its receptor involves two separate binding sites: C5a residues located in the region between 12-46 (11, 12) bind to a primary binding site partly coinciding with the binding site of CHIPS, while the C terminus of C5a (residues 69-74) binds to the activation domain of the C5aR located in the receptor core (13). Because of their dissimilarity in sequence and structure, the binding sites of CHIPS and C5a are not identical (11). The present working model is that CHIPS interferes with the primary binding site of C5a located at the N terminus of the C5aR, thereby preventing the C-terminal tail of C5a from contacting the activation domain of the C5aR and blocking downstream signaling. Currently, the development of C5aR inhibitors has been focused primarily on mimicking C5a in order to directly interrupt C5a-mediated C5aR signaling (3, 4, 14). Understanding the interactions between CHIPS and the C5aR may provide valuable insights toward the development of new C5aR antagonists.Postma et al. (15) proposed that residues involved in CHIPS binding are located between residues 10-18 of the C5aR. Specifically, the acidic residues Asp-10, Asp-15, and Asp-18 and residue Gly-12 appear to be critical for binding. High affinity binding was observed between ¹²⁵I-labeled CHIPS and the N-terminal portion of the C5aR (residues 1-38) expressed on the cell surface of HEK293 cells (K_d = 29.7 ± 4.4 nm). In contrast, very moderate affinity between CHIPS and a synthetic C5aR N-terminal peptide (residues 1-37; K_d = 40 ± 19 μm), measured by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), was recently reported by Wright et al. (16). The discrepancy in the magnitude of these dissociation constants may be explained by the presence of two sulfate groups on tyrosine 11 and 14 of the C5aR N terminus expressed on the cell surface of HEK293 cells, which are absent in the synthetic C5aR peptide utilized by Wright et al. (16). Farzan et al. (17) stressed the critical role of these sulfate groups in activation of the C5aR by C5a. Previous mutational studies employing FITC-labeled CHIPS, however, suggested that the sulfate groups had only a limited effect on the binding affinity (15).To resolve these discrepancies, we set out to chemically synthesize several sulfated and unsulfated peptides representing the N terminus of the human C5aR. We have measured the binding affinities of these peptides to CHIPS_31-121 by ITC and used the C5aR peptide with the highest affinity to determine the structure of the complex between CHIPS_31-121 and the C5aR N terminus by NMR spectroscopy.     

Residues 10-18 within the C5a receptor N terminus compose a binding domain for chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus

Chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus (CHIPS) is excreted by the majority of S. aureus strains and is a potent inhibitor of C5a- and formylated peptide-mediated chemotaxis of neutrophils and monocytes. Recently, we reported that CHIPS binds to the C5a receptor (C5aR) and the formylated peptide receptor, thereby blocking activation by C5a and formylated peptides, respectively. The anaphylatoxin C5a plays an important role in host immunity and pathological inflammatory processes. For C5a a two-site binding model is proposed in which C5a initially binds the C5aR N terminus, followed by interaction of the C5a C-terminal tail with an effector domain on the receptor. We have shown here that CHIPS does not affect activation of the C5aR by a peptide mimic of the C5a C terminus. Moreover, CHIPS was found to bind human embryonic kidney 293 cells expressing only the C5aR N terminus. Deletion and mutation experiments within this C5aR N-terminal expression system revealed that the binding site of CHIPS is contained in a short stretch of 9 amino acids (amino acids 10-18), of which the aspartic acid residues at positions 10, 15, and 18 plus the glycine at position 12 are crucial. Binding studies with C5aR/C3aR and C5aR/IL8RA chimeras confirmed that CHIPS binds only to the C5aR N terminus without involvement of its extracellular loops. CHIPS may provide new strategies to block the C5aR, which may lead to the development of new C5aR antagonists.     

Structural models for the complex of chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus with the C5a receptor

The study presents structural models for the complex of the chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus, CHIPS, and receptor for anaphylotoxin C5a, C5aR. The models are based on the recently found NMR structure of the complex between CHIPS fragment 31-121 and C5aR fragment 7-28, as well as on previous results of molecular modeling of C5aR. Simple and straightforward modeling procedure selected low-energy conformations of the C5aR fragment 8-41 that simultaneously fit the NMR structure of the C5aR 10-18 fragment and properly orient the NMR structure of CHIPS_31-121 relative to C5aR. Extensive repacking of the side chains of CHIPS_31-121 and C5aR_8-41 predicted specific residue-residue interactions on the interface between CHIPS and C5aR. Many of these interactions were rationalized with experimental data obtained by site-directed mutagenesis of CHIPS and C5aR. The models correctly showed that CHIPS binds only to the first binding site of C5a to C5aR not competing with C5a fragment 59-74, which binds the second binding site of C5aR. The models also predict that two elements of CHIPS, fragments 48-58 and 97-111, may be used as structural templates for potential inhibitors of C5a.     

Chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus binds specifically to the C5a and formylated peptide receptor

Chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus (CHIPS) is an exoprotein produced by several strains of S. aureus, and a potent inhibitor of neutrophil and monocyte chemotaxis toward C5a and formylated peptides like fMLP. These chemoattractants act on their target cells by binding and activating the C5aR and formylated peptide receptor (FPR), respectively. In the present report, we examined the mechanism by which CHIPS affects both of these receptors. We showed that CHIPS blocked binding of anti-C5aR mAb and formylated peptide to human neutrophils as efficiently at temperatures of 0 and 37 degrees C, implying that it is independent of signal transducing systems. This was confirmed by showing that CHIPS acts completely independently of ATP. Additionally, CHIPS was not internalized upon binding to neutrophils. Furthermore, we showed that CHIPS binds specifically to the C5aR and FPR expressed on U937 cells. This binding was functional in blocking C5a- and fMLP-induced calcium mobilization in these cell lines. These results suggest that CHIPS binds directly to the C5aR and FPR, thereby preventing the natural ligands from activating these receptors. The apparent K(d) values of CHIPS for the C5aR and FPR were 1.1 +/- 0.2 nM and 35.4 +/- 7.7 nM, respectively. Moreover, after screening a wide variety of other G protein-coupled receptors, CHIPS was found to affect exclusively the C5aR and FPR. This selectivity and high-affinity binding with potent antagonistic effects makes CHIPS a promising lead for the development of new anti-inflammatory compounds for diseases in which damage by neutrophils plays a key role.     

Random mutagenesis of the complement factor 5a (C5a) receptor N terminus provides a structural constraint for C5a docking

The N terminus of G protein-coupled receptors has been implicated in binding to peptide hormones. We have used random saturation mutagenesis to identify essential residues in the N terminus of the human complement factor 5a receptor (C5aR). In a library of N-terminal mutant C5aR molecules screened for activation by C5a, residues 24-30 of the C5aR showed a marked propensity to mutate to cysteine, most likely indicating that sulfhydryl groups at these positions are appropriately situated to form disulfide interactions with the unpaired Cys(27) of human C5a. This presumptive spatial constraint allowed the ligand to be computationally docked to the receptor to form a model of the C5a/C5aR interaction. When the N-terminal mutant C5aR library was rescreened with C5a C27R, a ligand incapable of disulfide interactions, no individual position in the N terminus was essential for receptor signaling. However, the region 19-29 was relatively highly conserved in the functional mutants, further demonstrating that this region of the C5aR makes a productive physiologic interaction with the C5a ligand.     

The structure of the C5a receptor-blocking domain of chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus is related to a group of immune evasive molecules

The chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus (CHIPS) is a 121 residue excreted virulence factor. It acts by binding the C5a- (C5aR) and formylated peptide receptor (FPR) and thereby blocks specific phagocyte responses. Here, we report the solution structure of a CHIPS fragment consisting of residues 31-121 (CHIPS31-121). CHIPS31-121 has the same activity in blocking the C5aR compared to full-length CHIPS, but completely lacks FPR antagonism. CHIPS31-121 has a compact fold comprising an alpha-helix (residues 38-51) packed onto a four-stranded anti-parallel beta-sheet. Strands beta2 and beta3 are joined by a long loop with a relatively well-defined conformation. Comparison of CHIPS31-121 with known structures reveals striking homology with the C-terminal domain of staphylococcal superantigen-like proteins (SSLs) 5 and 7, and the staphyloccocal and streptococcal superantigens TSST-1 and SPE-C. Also, the recently reported structures of several domains of the staphylococcal extracellullar adherence protein (EAP) show a high degree of structural similarity with CHIPS. Most of the conserved residues in CHIPS and its structural homologues are present in the alpha-helix. A conserved arginine residue (R46 in CHIPS) appears to be involved in preservation of the structure. Site-directed mutagenesis of all positively charged residues in CHIPS31-121 reveals a major involvement of arginine 44 and lysine 95 in C5aR antagonism. The structure of CHIPS31-121 will be vital in the further unraveling of its precise mechanism of action. Its structural homology to S.aureus SSLs, superantigens, and EAP might help the design of future experiments towards an understanding of the relationship between structure and function of these proteins.     

Chimeric receptors of the human C3a receptor and C5a receptor (CD88)

Chimeras were generated between the human anaphylatoxin C3a and C5a receptors (C3aR and C5aR, respectively) to define the structural requirements for ligand binding and discrimination. Chimeric receptors were generated by systematically exchanging between the two receptors four receptor modules (the N terminus, transmembrane regions 1 to 4, the second extracellular loop, and transmembrane region 5 to the C terminus). The mutants were transiently expressed in HEK-293 cells (with or without Galpha-16) and analyzed for cell surface expression, binding of C3a and C5a, and functional responsiveness (calcium mobilization) toward C3a, C5a, and a C3a as well as a C5a analogue peptide. The data indicate that in both anaphylatoxin receptors the transmembrane regions and the second extracellular loop act as a functional unit that is disrupted by any reciprocal exchange. N-terminal substitution confirmed the two-binding site model for the human C5aR, in which the receptor N terminus is required for high affinity binding of the native ligand but not a C5a analogue peptide. In contrast, the human C3a receptor did not require the original N terminus for high affinity binding of and activation by C3a, a result that was confirmed by N-terminal deletion mutants. This indicates a completely different binding mode of the anaphylatoxins to their corresponding receptors. The C5a analogue peptide, but not C5a, was an agonist of the C3aR. Replacement of the C3aR N terminus by the C5aR sequence, however, lead to the generation of a true hybrid C3a/C5a receptor, which bound and functionally responded to both ligands, C3a and C5a.     

The role of the N-terminal domain of the complement fragment receptor C5L2 in ligand binding

C5L2 is a new cellular receptor found to interact with the human anaphylatoxins complement factor C5a and its C-terminal cleavage product C5a des Arg. The classical human C5a receptor (C5aR) preferentially binds C5a, with a 10-100-fold lower affinity for C5a des Arg. In contrast, C5L2 binds both ligands with nearly equal affinity. C5aR presents acidic and tyrosine residues in its N terminus that interact with the core of C5a while a hydrophobic pocket formed by the transmembrane helices interacts with residues in the C terminus of C5a. Here, we have investigated the molecular basis for the increased affinity of C5L2 for C5a des Arg. Rat and mouse C5L2 preferentially bound C5a des Arg, whereas rodent C5aR showed much higher affinity for intact C5a. Effective peptidic and non-peptidic ligands for the transmembrane hydrophobic pocket of C5aR were poor inhibitors of ligand binding to C5L2. An antibody raised against the N terminus of human C5L2 did not affect the binding of C5a to C5L2 but did inhibit C5a des Arg binding. A chimeric C5L2, containing the N terminus of C5aR, had little effect on the affinity for C5a des Arg. Mutation of acidic and tyrosine residues in the N terminus of human C5L2 revealed that 3 residues were critical for C5a des Arg binding but had little involvement in C5a binding. C5L2 thus appears to bind C5a and C5a des Arg by different mechanisms, and, unlike C5aR, C5L2 uses critical residues in its N-terminal domain for binding only to C5a des Arg.     

Calorimetric and spectroscopic examination of the solution phase structures of prekallikrein binding domain peptides of high molecular weight kininogen

Unique sequence-binding sites are exposed on the surface of high molecular weight kininogen which complex prekallikrein or factor XI with high affinity and specificity. A sequence comprising 31 residues of the mature kininogen molecule (Asp565-Lys595) retains full binding activity for prekallikrein (K _D =20 nM) and assumes a complex folded structure in solution which is stabilized by long-range interactions between N- and C-terminal residues. The sequence Trp569-Lys595 (27 residues) shows only 28% of this binding affinity and lacks the key structural features required for protein recognition (Scarsale, J. N., and Harris, R. B.,J. Prot. Chem. 9, 647–659, 1990). We were thus able to predict that N- or C-terminal truncations of the binding-site sequence would disrupt the conformational integrity required for binding. Two new peptides of 20- and 22- residues have now been synthesized and their solution phase structures examined. These peptides are N- and C-terminal truncations, respectively, of the 27-residue sequence and correspond to the sequences Asp576-Lys595 and Trp569-Asp590 of high molecular weight kininogen. The results of fluorescence emission and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopies in the range 25–90°C and from differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) all substantiate the idea that the C-terminal truncation peptide binds prekallikrein 35-fold poorer than the 31-residue peptide because it is relatively unoredered and possesses a less stable structure. Surprisingly, the N-terminal truncation peptide (20-mer) shows structural stability even at elevated temperatures and, like the 31-residue peptide, undergoes cold-induced denaturation observable in the DSC. 2D-NMR analysis of the 20-residue peptide revealed two distinct structures; one conformer possesses a more compact, folded structure than the other. However, the predicted structures assumed by either conformer are very different from those of either the 31- or 27-residue peptides. Hence, the binding affinity of the 20-residue peptide is 60-fold poorer than that for the 31-residue peptide because it assumes a nonproductive binding conformation(s).     

N-terminal residues of the chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus are essential for blocking formylated peptide receptor but not C5a receptor

Staphylococcus aureus excretes a factor that specifically and simultaneously acts on the C5aR and the formylated peptide receptor (FPR). This chemotaxis inhibitory protein of S. aureus (CHIPS) blocks C5a- and fMLP-induced phagocyte activation and chemotaxis. Monoclonal anti-CHIPS Abs inhibit CHIPS activity against one receptor completely without affecting the other receptor, indicating that two distinct sites are responsible for both actions. A CHIPS-derived N-terminal 6 aa peptide is capable of mimicking the anti-FPR properties of CHIPS but has no effect on the C5aR. Synthetic peptides in which the first 6 aa are substituted individually for all other naturally occurring amino acids show that the first and third residue play an important role in blocking the FPR. Using an Escherichia coli expression system, we created mutant CHIPS proteins in which these amino acids are substituted. These mutant proteins have impaired or absent FPR- but still an intact C5aR-blocking activity, indicating that the loss of the FPR-blocking activity is not caused by any structural impairment. This identifies the first and third amino acid, both a phenylalanine, to be essential for CHIPS blocking the fMLP-induced activation of phagocytes. The unique properties of CHIPS to specifically inhibit the FPR with high affinity (kd=35.4 +/- 7.7 nM) could be an important new tool to further stimulate the fundamental research on the mechanisms underlying the FPR and its role in disease processes.     

Micelle bound structure and DNA interaction of brevinin‐2‐related peptide,an antimicrobial peptide derived from frog skin

Brevinin‐2‐related peptide (BR‐II), a novel antimicrobial peptide isolated from the skin of frog, Rana septentrionalis, shows a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity with low haemolytic activity. It has also been shown to have antiviral activity, specifically to protect cells from infection by HIV‐1. To understand the active conformation of the BR‐II peptide in membranes, we have investigated the interaction of BR‐II with the prokaryotic and eukaryotic membrane‐mimetic micelles such as sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) and dodecylphosphocholine (DPC), respectively. The interactions were studied using fluorescence and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. Fluorescence experiments revealed that the N‐terminus tryptophan residue of BR‐II interacts with the hydrophobic core of the membrane mimicking micelles. The CD results suggest that interactions with membrane‐mimetic micelles induce an α‐helix conformation in BR‐II. We have also determined the solution structures of BR‐II in DPC and SDS micelles using NMR spectroscopy. The structural comparison of BR‐II in the presence of SDS and DPC micelles showed significant conformational changes in the residues connecting the N‐terminus and C‐terminus helices. The ability of BR‐II to bind DNA was elucidated by agarose gel retardation and fluorescence experiments. The structural differences of BR‐II in zwitterionic versus anionic membrane mimics and the DNA binding ability of BR‐II collectively contribute to the general understanding of the pharmacological specificity of this peptide towards prokaryotic and eukaryotic membranes and provide insights into its overall antimicrobial mechanism. Copyright © 2014 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Structural analysis of the human cannabinoid receptor one carboxyl‐terminus identifies two amphipathic helices

Recent research has implicated the C‐terminus of G‐protein coupled receptors in key events such as receptor activation and subsequent intracellular sorting, yet obtaining structural information of the entire C‐tail has proven a formidable task. Here, a peptide corresponding to the full‐length C‐tail of the human CB1 receptor (residues 400–472) was expressed in E.coli and purified in a soluble form. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy revealed that the peptide adopts an α‐helical conformation in negatively charged and zwitterionic detergents (48–51% and 36–38%, respectively), whereas it exhibited the CD signature of unordered structure at low concentration in aqueous solution. Interestingly, 27% helicity was displayed at high peptide concentration suggesting that self‐association induces helix formation in the absence of a membrane mimetic. NMR spectroscopy of the doubly labeled (¹⁵N‐ and ¹³C‐) C‐terminus in dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) identified two amphipathic α‐helical domains. The first domain, S401‐F412, corresponds to the helix 8 common to G protein‐coupled receptors while the second domain, A440‐M461, is a newly identified structural motif in the distal region of the carboxyl‐terminus of the receptor. Molecular modeling of the C‐tail in DPC indicates that both helices lie parallel to the plane of the membrane with their hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces poised for critical interactions. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 91: 565–573, 2009. This article was originally published online as an accepted preprint. The “Published Online” date corresponds to the preprint version. You can request a copy of the preprint by emailing the Biopolymers editorial office at biopolymers@wiley.com     

Third Extracellular Loop (EC3)-N Terminus Interaction Is Important for Seven-transmembrane Domain Receptor Function: IMPLICATIONS FOR AN ACTIVATION MICROSWITCH REGION*

The canonical heptahelical bundle architecture of seven-transmembrane domain (7TM) receptors is intertwined by three intra- and three extracellular loops, whose local conformations are important in receptor signaling. Many 7TM receptors contain a cysteine residue in the third extracellular loop (EC3) and a complementary cysteine residue on the N terminus. The functional role of such EC3-N terminus conserved cysteine pairs remains unclear. This study explores the role of the EC3-N terminus cysteine pairs on receptor conformation and G protein activation by disrupting them in the chemokine receptor CXCR4, while engineering a novel EC3-N terminus cysteine pair into the complement factor 5a receptor (C5aR), a chemo attractant receptor that lacks it. Mutated CXCR4 and C5aRs were expressed in engineered yeast. Mutation of the cysteine pair with the serine pair (C28S/C274S) in constitutively active mutant CXCR4 abrogated the receptor activation, whereas mutation with the aromatic pair (C28F–C274F) or the salt bridge pair (C28R/C274E), respectively, rescued or retained the receptor activation in response to CXCL12. In this context, the cysteine pair (Cys³⁰ and Cys²⁷²) engineered into the EC3-N terminus (Ser³⁰ and Ser²⁷²) of a novel constitutively active mutant of C5aR restrained the constitutive signaling without affecting the C5a-induced activation. Further mutational studies demonstrated a previously unappreciated role for Ser²⁷² on EC3 of C5aR and its interaction with the N terminus, thus defining a new microswitch region within the C5aR. Similar results were obtained with mutated CXCR4 and C5aRs expressed in COS-7 cells. These studies demonstrate a novel role of the EC3-N terminus cysteine pairs in G protein-coupled receptor activation and signaling.     

Structure and interactions of the carboxyl terminus of striated muscle alpha-tropomyosin: it is important to be flexible

Tropomyosin (TM) binds to and regulates the actin filament. We used circular dichroism and heteronuclear NMR to investigate the secondary structure and interactions of the C terminus of striated muscle alpha-TM, a major functional determinant, using a model peptide, TM9a(251-284). The (1)H(alpha) and (13)C(alpha) chemical shift displacements show that residues 252 to 277 are alpha-helical but residues 278 to 284 are nonhelical and mobile. The (1)H(N) and (13)C' displacements suggest that residues 257 to 269 form a coiled coil. Formation of an "overlap" binary complex with a 33-residue N-terminal chimeric peptide containing residues 1 to 14 of alpha-TM perturbs the (1)H(N) and (15)N resonances of residues 274 to 284. Addition of a fragment of troponin T, TnT(70-170), to the binary complex perturbs most of the (1)H(N)-(15)N cross-peaks. In addition, there are many new cross-peaks, showing that the binding is asymmetric. Q263, in a proposed troponin T binding site, shows two sets of side-chain (15)N-(1)H cross-peaks, indicating conformational flexibility. The conformational equilibrium of the side chain changes upon formation of the binary and ternary complexes. Replacing Q263 with leucine greatly increases the stability of TM9a(251-284) and reduces its ability to form the binary and ternary complexes, showing that conformational flexibility is crucial for the binding functions of the C terminus.     

Comparative agonist/antagonist responses in mutant human C5a receptors define the ligand binding site

The C terminus is responsible for all of the agonist activity of C5a at human C5a receptors (C5aRs). In this report we have mapped the ligand binding site on the C5aR using a series of agonist and antagonist peptide mimics of the C terminus of C5a as well as receptors mutated at putative interaction sites (Ile(116), Arg(175,) Arg(206), Glu(199), Asp(282), and Val(286)). Agonist peptide 1 (Phe-Lys-Pro-d-cyclohexylalanine-cyclohexylalanine-d-Arg) can be converted to an antagonist by substituting the bulkier Trp for cyclohexylalanine at position 5 (peptide 2). Conversely, mutation of C5aR transmembrane residue Ile(116) to the smaller Ala (I116A) makes the receptor respond to peptide 2 as an agonist (Gerber, B. O., Meng, E. C., Dotsch, V., Baranski, T. J., and Bourne, H. R. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 3394-3400). However, a potent cyclic hexapeptide antagonist, Phe-cyclo-[Orn-Pro-d-cyclohexylalanine-Trp-Arg] (peptide 3), derived from peptide 2 and which binds to the same receptor site, remains a full antagonist at I116AC5aR. This suggests that although the residue at position 5 might bind near to Ile(116), the latter is not essential for either activation or antagonism. Arg(206) and Arg(175) both appear to interact with the C-terminal carboxylate of C5a agonist peptides, suggesting a dynamic binding mechanism that may be a part of a receptor activation switch. Asp(282) has been previously shown to interact with the side chain of the C-terminal Arg residue, and Glu(199) may also interact with this side chain in both C5a and peptide mimics. Using these interactions to orient NMR-derived ligand structures in the binding site of C5aR, a new model of the interaction between peptide antagonists and the C5aR is presented.     

Site-specific disulfide capture of agonist and antagonist peptides on the C5a receptor

The manner by which peptidic ligands bind and activate their corresponding G-protein-coupled receptors is not well understood. One of the better characterized peptidic ligands is the chemotactic cytokine complement factor 5a (C5a), a 74-amino acid helical bundle. Previous studies showed 6-mer peptide analogs derived from the C terminus of the C5a ligand can bind to C5aR (Kd values approximately 0.1-1 microm) and either agonize or antagonize the receptor (Gerber, B. O., Meng, E. C., Dotsch, V., Baranski, T. J., and Bourne, H. R. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 3394-3400). Here, we provide direct biochemical data using disulfide trapping to support a model that these peptides bind within a transmembrane helical triad formed by alpha-helices III, VI, and VII. We show that the three amino acids on the C terminus of the peptide analogs bind too weakly to exert a functional effect themselves. However, when a cysteine residue is placed on their N terminus they can be trapped by disulfide interchange to specific cysteines in helix III and VI and not to other cysteines, engineered into the C5aR. The trapped peptides function as agonists or partial antagonists, similar to the non-covalent parents from which they were derived. These data help to further refine the binding mode for C5a to the C5aR and suggest an approach and a binding site that may be applicable to studying other peptide binding receptors.     

Synthetic α-helical peptides incorporating intercalators for DNA recognition

The design and synthesis of a water-soluble 14-residue peptide, in which a quinoline intercalator is attached to the peptide backbone via alkylation of a central cysteine residue, is reported. 600 MHz ¹H NMR spectroscopy and circular dichroism indicate that the peptide forms a nascent helix in aqueous solution, ie. an ensemble of turn-like structures over several adjacent residues in the peptide. A large number of sequential d_NN(i, i+1) connectivities were observed in NOESY spectra, and titration of trifluoroethanol into a solution of the peptide resulted in the characteristic CD spectrum expected for an α-helix. At low DNA concentrations, CD spectroscopy indicates that this helical conformation is stabilized, presumably due to folding of the peptide in the major groove of DNA.     

Purification of truncated and mutated Chemotaxis Inhibitory Protein of Staphylococcus aureus--an anti-inflammatory protein

The Chemotaxis Inhibitory Protein of Staphylococcus aureus (CHIPS) binds and blocks the C5a receptor (C5aR) and formyl-peptide receptor (FPR). This way, CHIPS is a potent inhibitor of the immune cell recruitment associated with inflammation. Truncation of the protein and the introduction of mutations, shifts the expression towards the insoluble fraction of Escherichia coli, whereas the wild-type protein can be solubly expressed. A protocol for expression and tag independent purification of biologically active CHIPS variants has been established to enable further characterization of an improved CHIPS variant, called ADC-1004. The CHIPS variants were purified by washing of E. coli inclusion bodies followed by refolding and gel filtration. New techniques were utilized to optimize the purification process. Expression in inclusion bodies was increased by the use of Ultra Yield^™ flasks and optimal refolding conditions were determined by the use of the iFOLD Refolding System 2^™.The folding and biological activity of the purified proteins were analyzed by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and flow cytometry, respectively, and compared to solubly produced CHIPS_31–113 and wild-type CHIPS_1–121. We show that the CHIPS variants produced in inclusion bodies can be refolded and purified to achieve equal biological activity as solubly produced CHIPS_31–113 and wild-type CHIPS_1–121. The truncation causes minor structural changes while purification from inclusion bodies or the soluble fraction does not further affect the structure.     

The role of the ribosomal protein S19 C-terminus in Gi protein-dependent alternative activation of p38 MAP kinase via the C5a receptor in HMC-1 cells

We have demonstrated that an alternative C5a receptor (C5aR) ligand, the homodimer of ribosomal protein S19 (RP S19), contains a unique C-terminus (I₁₃₄–H₁₄₅) that is distinct from the moieties involved in the C5a–C5aR interaction. To examine the role of I₁₃₄–H₁₄₅ in the ligand–C5aR interaction, we connected this peptide to the C-terminus of C5a (C5a/RP S19) and found that it endowed the second binding moiety of RP S19 (L₁₃₁DR) with a relatively higher binding affinity to the C5aR on a human mast cell line, HMC-1. In contrast to the C5aR, the second C5aR C5L2 worked as a decoy receptor. As a result, the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) downstream of the Gi protein exchanged extracellular-signal regulated kinase for p38MAPK. This alternative p38MAPK activation could be pharmacologically suppressed not only by the downregulation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) by LY294002, but also by the over-activation of protein kinase C by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate. The activation was reproduced upon C5a–C5aR interaction by a simultaneous suppression of PI3K and phospholipase C with LY294002 and U73122 at low concentrations. Moreover, p38MAPK phosphorylation upstream of the pertussis toxin-dependent extracellular Ca²⁺ entry was also suppressed by high concentrations of MgCl₂, which blocks melastatin-type transient receptor potential Ca²⁺ channels (TRPMs). The active conformation of C5aR upon the ligation by C5a, at least on HMC-1 cells, is changed by the additional interaction of the I₁₃₄–H₁₄₅ peptide, which seems to guide the alternative activation of p38MAPK. This activation is then amplified by a novel positive feedback loop between p38MAPK and TRPM.     

Mapping interactions of gastric inhibitory polypeptide with GIPR N‐terminus using NMR and molecular dynamics simulations

Glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (gastric inhibitory polypeptide, or GIP), a 42‐amino acid incretin hormone, modulates insulin secretion in a glucose‐concentration‐dependent manner. Its insulinotropic action is highly dependent on glucose concentration that surmounts the hypoglycemia side effects associated with current therapy. In order to develop a GIP‐based anti‐diabetic therapy, it is essential to establish the 3D structure of the peptide and study its interaction with the GIP receptor (GIPR) in detail. This will give an insight into the GIP‐mediated insulin release process. In this article, we report the solution structure of GIP(1–42, human)NH₂ deduced by NMR and the interaction of the peptide with the N‐terminus of GIPR using molecular modelling methods. The structure of GIP(1–42, human)NH₂ in H₂O has been investigated using 2D‐NMR (DQF‐COSY, TOCSY, NOESY, ¹H‐¹³C HSQC) experiments, and its conformation was built by constrained MD simulations with the NMR data as constraints. The peptide in H₂O exhibits an α‐helical structure between residues Ser8 and Asn39 with some discontinuity at residues Gln29 to Asp35; the helix is bent at Gln29. This bent gives the peptide an ‘L’ shape that becomes more pronounced upon binding to the receptor. The interaction of GIP with the N‐terminus of GIPR was modelled by allowing GIP to interact with the N‐terminus of GIPR under a series of decreasing constraints in a molecular dynamics simulation, culminating with energy minimization without application of any constraints on the system. The canonical ensemble obtained from the simulation was subjected to a detailed energy analysis to identify the peptide–protein interaction patterns at the individual residue level. These interaction energies shed some light on the binding of GIP with the GIPR N‐terminus in a quantitative manner. Copyright © 2010 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.